<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/thinking-makes-it-so-debe58c9-619a-4a1c-b867-8ee07330cea9" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>Thinking Makes It So</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/thinking-makes-it-so-debe58c9-619a-4a1c-b867-8ee07330cea9</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Artificial intelligence patent law, from a registered patent attorney. Every Monday, the week's developments: Federal Circuit decisions, Patent Office guidance, and what the largest AI companies are filing. Every Friday, original data computed from Patent Office records. On Wednesdays, a longer episode on the Supreme Court, the inventions that changed things, and what Shakespeare can teach a lawyer. On Saturdays, one granted artificial intelligence patent, explained from what the technology does to what the patent lets its owner stop others from doing. And a short episode on each new Federal Circuit decision on artificial intelligence patents. From Jon Burbage of Burbage Law, PC, in Salt Lake City. Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</description>
    <copyright>© 2026 Burbage Law, PC</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>4eb452c3-8c6e-534c-9f3e-dad28e4ebb6f</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 08:09:36 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 08:10:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://burbagelaw.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Technology"/>
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/OHIDIrTGCV9UKjO-k3jh8BEHVq1GcdVfGEqnygiFx60/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83Zjc5/Mzc0OTRmYmFiNjNh/YTJkYTBiZmI3YWJh/MDcyZS5qcGc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Artificial intelligence patent law, from a registered patent attorney. Every Monday, the week's developments: Federal Circuit decisions, Patent Office guidance, and what the largest AI companies are filing. Every Friday, original data computed from Patent Office records. On Wednesdays, a longer episode on the Supreme Court, the inventions that changed things, and what Shakespeare can teach a lawyer. On Saturdays, one granted artificial intelligence patent, explained from what the technology does to what the patent lets its owner stop others from doing. And a short episode on each new Federal Circuit decision on artificial intelligence patents. From Jon Burbage of Burbage Law, PC, in Salt Lake City. Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Artificial intelligence patent law, from a registered patent attorney.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Jon Burbage</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>jon@burbagelaw.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>October 28: Diamond v. Diehr and the rubber press</title>
      <itunes:title>October 28: Diamond v. Diehr and the rubber press</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca2ca544-4f69-45bf-8802-efd6f6fec53f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a9cb200f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In 1981 the Supreme Court held, five to four, that a rubber-curing process run by a computer could be patented. Jon and Catie on Diamond v. Diehr, the two cases before it that said no, how Alice read it in 2014, and what it means for anyone patenting artificial intelligence today.

Sources:
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/450/175/
Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/437/584/
Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/409/63/
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/208/
US Patent 4,344,142: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4344142A/en

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In 1981 the Supreme Court held, five to four, that a rubber-curing process run by a computer could be patented. Jon and Catie on Diamond v. Diehr, the two cases before it that said no, how Alice read it in 2014, and what it means for anyone patenting artificial intelligence today.

Sources:
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/450/175/
Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/437/584/
Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/409/63/
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/208/
US Patent 4,344,142: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4344142A/en

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 06:13:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Jon Burbage</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a9cb200f/d0bb9c3c.mp3" length="8556620" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/gZEazfJS5_8tygGVQnCDVs0EGdCTUFvTqLySRIngtc8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9kZTZl/MzJhOWZkNGRkY2U1/OGQ3NGY0NjhhZjlh/NmIwNS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>535</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1981 the Supreme Court held, five to four, that a rubber-curing process run by a computer could be patented. Jon and Catie on Diamond v. Diehr, the two cases before it that said no, how Alice read it in 2014, and what it means for anyone patenting artificial intelligence today.

Sources:
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/450/175/
Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/437/584/
Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/409/63/
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/208/
US Patent 4,344,142: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4344142A/en

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1981 the Supreme Court held, five to four, that a rubber-curing process run by a computer could be patented. Jon and Catie on Diamond v. Diehr, the two cases before it that said no, how Alice read it in 2014, and what it means for anyone patenting arti</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October 26: File before you publish, older patents at the Board, and China's export catalogue</title>
      <itunes:title>October 26: File before you publish, older patents at the Board, and China's export catalogue</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d193003-0465-4ae5-9bab-d708c0c16e52</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a74a5686</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[OpenAI's published applications on reasoning summaries (Pub. Nos. 2026/0330193 and 2026/0330194) and Google's on generalized residual attention blocks (Pub. No. 2026/0330219), and why a patent program files before anything is published; Google LLC v. VirtaMove, Corp., No. 25-1230 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2026) (certiorari denied) and the Patent Office's institution figures for fiscal year 2026; and China's draft revision of its catalogue of technologies prohibited or restricted from export (Announcement No. 48 of 2026).

The entries:
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-22-openai-claims-buffer-turns-reasoning-model-s-hidden.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-22-google-claims-residual-block-lets-layer-attend-over.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-supreme-court-declines-review-office-s-settled-expec.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-16-china-s-draft-export-catalogue-would-restrict-ban-ex.html

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/updates.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[OpenAI's published applications on reasoning summaries (Pub. Nos. 2026/0330193 and 2026/0330194) and Google's on generalized residual attention blocks (Pub. No. 2026/0330219), and why a patent program files before anything is published; Google LLC v. VirtaMove, Corp., No. 25-1230 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2026) (certiorari denied) and the Patent Office's institution figures for fiscal year 2026; and China's draft revision of its catalogue of technologies prohibited or restricted from export (Announcement No. 48 of 2026).

The entries:
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-22-openai-claims-buffer-turns-reasoning-model-s-hidden.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-22-google-claims-residual-block-lets-layer-attend-over.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-supreme-court-declines-review-office-s-settled-expec.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-16-china-s-draft-export-catalogue-would-restrict-ban-ex.html

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/updates.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:40:03 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Jon Burbage</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a74a5686/5fbea4b0.mp3" length="9449007" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/2fvfAovpNkArZNt3rxjPWS4me11dEuIlVAyqjIzUJSM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mZTAy/NTJlODIxYWQzYzgx/NjhjOGFkYzUyMTQy/ZGIyZS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>591</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>OpenAI's published applications on reasoning summaries (Pub. Nos. 2026/0330193 and 2026/0330194) and Google's on generalized residual attention blocks (Pub. No. 2026/0330219), and why a patent program files before anything is published; Google LLC v. VirtaMove, Corp., No. 25-1230 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2026) (certiorari denied) and the Patent Office's institution figures for fiscal year 2026; and China's draft revision of its catalogue of technologies prohibited or restricted from export (Announcement No. 48 of 2026).

The entries:
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-22-openai-claims-buffer-turns-reasoning-model-s-hidden.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-22-google-claims-residual-block-lets-layer-attend-over.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-supreme-court-declines-review-office-s-settled-expec.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-16-china-s-draft-export-catalogue-would-restrict-ban-ex.html

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/updates.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>OpenAI's published applications on reasoning summaries (Pub. Nos. 2026/0330193 and 2026/0330194) and Google's on generalized residual attention blocks (Pub. No. 2026/0330219), and why a patent program files before anything is published; Google LLC v. Virt</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October 24: The patent behind the T in GPT</title>
      <itunes:title>October 24: The patent behind the T in GPT</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36f3be01-ed53-4878-993f-a6bd2a9f0f6f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/35276ba0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Jon and Catie walk through US Patent 10,452,978, Google's patent on the transformer, the design behind the T in GPT. Starting from what a neural network is, they build up to what claim one covers, what the dependent claims add, and four drafting lessons for anyone patenting artificial intelligence.

Sources:
US 10,452,978 B2, Attention-based sequence transduction neural networks: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10452978B2/en
Claims of US 10,452,978: https://patents.justia.com/patent/10452978
US 12,217,173 B2: https://patents.google.com/patent/US12217173B2/en
Attention Is All You Need (arXiv, version 1): https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762v1
Generative pre-trained transformer (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_pre-trained_transformer

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Jon and Catie walk through US Patent 10,452,978, Google's patent on the transformer, the design behind the T in GPT. Starting from what a neural network is, they build up to what claim one covers, what the dependent claims add, and four drafting lessons for anyone patenting artificial intelligence.

Sources:
US 10,452,978 B2, Attention-based sequence transduction neural networks: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10452978B2/en
Claims of US 10,452,978: https://patents.justia.com/patent/10452978
US 12,217,173 B2: https://patents.google.com/patent/US12217173B2/en
Attention Is All You Need (arXiv, version 1): https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762v1
Generative pre-trained transformer (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_pre-trained_transformer

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:13:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Jon Burbage</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/35276ba0/566b31b3.mp3" length="12429005" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/3a36pTT9iey-8QDTIQpNhyaPJYeeOCEiZiMjH6DtC-s/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xNDFk/ODFmYjNmMGJkMTYx/ZjRmNjAyZDA2NzQ5/NGZjOC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>777</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Jon and Catie walk through US Patent 10,452,978, Google's patent on the transformer, the design behind the T in GPT. Starting from what a neural network is, they build up to what claim one covers, what the dependent claims add, and four drafting lessons for anyone patenting artificial intelligence.

Sources:
US 10,452,978 B2, Attention-based sequence transduction neural networks: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10452978B2/en
Claims of US 10,452,978: https://patents.justia.com/patent/10452978
US 12,217,173 B2: https://patents.google.com/patent/US12217173B2/en
Attention Is All You Need (arXiv, version 1): https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762v1
Generative pre-trained transformer (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_pre-trained_transformer

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jon and Catie walk through US Patent 10,452,978, Google's patent on the transformer, the design behind the T in GPT. Starting from what a neural network is, they build up to what claim one covers, what the dependent claims add, and four drafting lessons f</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October 23: The agent applications of early 2025 publish</title>
      <itunes:title>October 23: The agent applications of early 2025 publish</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54a63db9-bbdc-47df-8fc4-bbf080aa1022</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/939099e0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Patent applications with “agent” in the title from eight large AI companies went from 15 to 47 in the 13 weeks ending October 22, 2026, compared with the same weeks of 2025, and 42 of the 47 have priority dates in February to April 2025. Neural-network classes now appear on 45% of these companies’ AI-related publications, up from 35%.

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/data/2026-10-23-what-big-ai-filers-are-claiming.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Patent applications with “agent” in the title from eight large AI companies went from 15 to 47 in the 13 weeks ending October 22, 2026, compared with the same weeks of 2025, and 42 of the 47 have priority dates in February to April 2025. Neural-network classes now appear on 45% of these companies’ AI-related publications, up from 35%.

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/data/2026-10-23-what-big-ai-filers-are-claiming.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:09:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Jon Burbage</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/939099e0/65d343e2.mp3" length="6301737" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/BQsFSA1eWCYzIcPzoKU8dxyepUg0877B71K5NSyxE9I/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS85MTJj/ZTBmMDZmOGVmMTk4/MDU5ZGNlMDhmNDg3/YWE5Ni5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>394</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Patent applications with “agent” in the title from eight large AI companies went from 15 to 47 in the 13 weeks ending October 22, 2026, compared with the same weeks of 2025, and 42 of the 47 have priority dates in February to April 2025. Neural-network classes now appear on 45% of these companies’ AI-related publications, up from 35%.

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/data/2026-10-23-what-big-ai-filers-are-claiming.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Patent applications with “agent” in the title from eight large AI companies went from 15 to 47 in the 13 weeks ending October 22, 2026, compared with the same weeks of 2025, and 42 of the 47 have priority dates in February to April 2025. Neural-network cl</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October 21: The lease clause that built the Globe</title>
      <itunes:title>October 21: The lease clause that built the Globe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9f7016e-d365-4399-b4cb-383a0b889d77</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4b54355e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In December 1598 the Burbage brothers took apart the Theatre, London's early playhouse, and used its timber to build the Globe. Their landlord, Giles Allen, sued for years over a lease that let them remove the building only before its term ended. Jon and Catie on the clause, the deadline, and what it means for every contract right that expires on a date.

Sources:
Shakespeare and the London Theatre (SHaLT), De Montfort University, The Theatre, 1576-98: https://shalt.dmu.ac.uk/locations/theatre-1576-98/indepth.html
Folger Shakespeare Library, Shakespeare Documented, Allen v. Burbage: https://shakespearedocumented.folger.edu/resource/document/allen-v-burbage
Folger Shakespeare Library, Shakespeare &amp; Beyond, Razing the Theatre, raising the Globe: https://www.folger.edu/blogs/shakespeare-and-beyond/raising-globe-theatre/
Joseph Quincy Adams, Shakespearean Playhouses (1917): https://www.gutenberg.org/files/22397/22397-h/22397-h.htm
Wikipedia, Peter Street (carpenter): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Street_(carpenter)

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In December 1598 the Burbage brothers took apart the Theatre, London's early playhouse, and used its timber to build the Globe. Their landlord, Giles Allen, sued for years over a lease that let them remove the building only before its term ended. Jon and Catie on the clause, the deadline, and what it means for every contract right that expires on a date.

Sources:
Shakespeare and the London Theatre (SHaLT), De Montfort University, The Theatre, 1576-98: https://shalt.dmu.ac.uk/locations/theatre-1576-98/indepth.html
Folger Shakespeare Library, Shakespeare Documented, Allen v. Burbage: https://shakespearedocumented.folger.edu/resource/document/allen-v-burbage
Folger Shakespeare Library, Shakespeare &amp; Beyond, Razing the Theatre, raising the Globe: https://www.folger.edu/blogs/shakespeare-and-beyond/raising-globe-theatre/
Joseph Quincy Adams, Shakespearean Playhouses (1917): https://www.gutenberg.org/files/22397/22397-h/22397-h.htm
Wikipedia, Peter Street (carpenter): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Street_(carpenter)

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:24:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Jon Burbage</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4b54355e/b20004d1.mp3" length="8779810" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/cUTga4OqS8LWYtgUctbyERE4G0--V8mc7BwwxFlvP74/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yZmY5/NjU4YjM3ZTc5MTY3/ZjZiMzZmY2E4NTIw/YTIxYS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>549</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In December 1598 the Burbage brothers took apart the Theatre, London's early playhouse, and used its timber to build the Globe. Their landlord, Giles Allen, sued for years over a lease that let them remove the building only before its term ended. Jon and Catie on the clause, the deadline, and what it means for every contract right that expires on a date.

Sources:
Shakespeare and the London Theatre (SHaLT), De Montfort University, The Theatre, 1576-98: https://shalt.dmu.ac.uk/locations/theatre-1576-98/indepth.html
Folger Shakespeare Library, Shakespeare Documented, Allen v. Burbage: https://shakespearedocumented.folger.edu/resource/document/allen-v-burbage
Folger Shakespeare Library, Shakespeare &amp;amp; Beyond, Razing the Theatre, raising the Globe: https://www.folger.edu/blogs/shakespeare-and-beyond/raising-globe-theatre/
Joseph Quincy Adams, Shakespearean Playhouses (1917): https://www.gutenberg.org/files/22397/22397-h/22397-h.htm
Wikipedia, Peter Street (carpenter): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Street_(carpenter)

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/podcast.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In December 1598 the Burbage brothers took apart the Theatre, London's early playhouse, and used its timber to build the Globe. Their landlord, Giles Allen, sued for years over a lease that let them remove the building only before its term ended. Jon and </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October 19: The Board's appeal odds, invention records, and two AI filings</title>
      <itunes:title>October 19: The Board's appeal odds, invention records, and two AI filings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24ac0c76-9fae-4c99-92c9-aea1cb43c8aa</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8996a54e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's fiscal year 2026 appeal numbers and what they mean for artificial intelligence applications; Google v. Valtrus Innovations (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2026) and why invention records should stay in their native files; OpenAI's application on the prompt-box control that sets a token budget; and Google's application on sizing a model to a compute budget.

The entries:
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-board-closed-fiscal-year-2026-smallest-appeal-invent.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-invention-record-survives-priority-fight-native-file.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-15-openai-claims-control-prompt-box-sets-how-many-token.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-15-google-claims-procedure-sizing-model-s-depth-width-c.html

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/updates.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's fiscal year 2026 appeal numbers and what they mean for artificial intelligence applications; Google v. Valtrus Innovations (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2026) and why invention records should stay in their native files; OpenAI's application on the prompt-box control that sets a token budget; and Google's application on sizing a model to a compute budget.

The entries:
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-board-closed-fiscal-year-2026-smallest-appeal-invent.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-invention-record-survives-priority-fight-native-file.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-15-openai-claims-control-prompt-box-sets-how-many-token.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-15-google-claims-procedure-sizing-model-s-depth-width-c.html

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/updates.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:32:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Jon Burbage</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8996a54e/d33d8978.mp3" length="6786170" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jon Burbage</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/2j5yb7YEoYWB8Q67sA0lZcBuHqacSG6bc_3H5V2j2GA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jOGQx/OTNmZTBlYzYwOWE0/ZjE3NTAxYjY1Y2Y4/Y2U1OC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>425</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's fiscal year 2026 appeal numbers and what they mean for artificial intelligence applications; Google v. Valtrus Innovations (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2026) and why invention records should stay in their native files; OpenAI's application on the prompt-box control that sets a token budget; and Google's application on sizing a model to a compute budget.

The entries:
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-board-closed-fiscal-year-2026-smallest-appeal-invent.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-19-invention-record-survives-priority-fight-native-file.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-15-openai-claims-control-prompt-box-sets-how-many-token.html
https://burbagelaw.com/entries/2026-10-15-google-claims-procedure-sizing-model-s-depth-width-c.html

Read the article: https://burbagelaw.com/updates.html

Nothing in this podcast is legal advice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's fiscal year 2026 appeal numbers and what they mean for artificial intelligence applications; Google v. Valtrus Innovations (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2026) and why invention records should stay in their native files; OpenAI's </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patent law, artificial intelligence, AI patents, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, USPTO, intellectual property, machine learning, Shakespeare</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
