<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.css" type="text/css"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="data:text/css,%3Aroot%7B--art%3Aurl%28%22https%3A%2F%2Fimg.transistorcdn.com%2FndgK904vCLjar6n8-r12SIt3LO2FJPByE17Nq1hUR2Y%2Frs%3Afill%3A0%3A0%3A1%2Fw%3A400%2Fh%3A400%2Fq%3A60%2Fmb%3A500000%2FaHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct%2FdXBsb2FkLXByb2R1%2FY3Rpb24udHJhbnNp%2Fc3Rvci5mbS83OTQ5%2FY2Y1ZmM3YTU2ZTk5%2FYTRkODcxMDdiYjM5%2FMGU2NC5wbmc.webp%22%29%3B--art-scale%3A1%7D" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-operators-canon" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The 10-Minute Marketing Fix</title>
    <link>https://mmsvegas.com/operators-canon/</link>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-operators-canon</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>The greatest marketing ideas of all time, explained in ten minutes, with one thing you can do Monday morning.

Each episode takes one real business problem, pulls out the principle that actually solves it, and hands you the move. Brian Kasday and his co-host work an enduring marketing principle out of the seminar and into a business you would actually recognise. No hype, no jargon, nothing you need a whiteboard for.

Part of The Operator's Canon, from MMS Vegas and The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</description>
    <copyright>© 2026 Multimedia Marketing Solutions</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>97309598-b6c2-578c-b8f9-cac5a8402cf4</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 04:00:19 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 04:04:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Marketing"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/lWr8-6ff9myEPCARabGf5-hH8OrW4gGCwOE0taJH9L8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83OTQ5/Y2Y1ZmM3YTU2ZTk5/YTRkODcxMDdiYjM5/MGU2NC5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>The greatest marketing ideas of all time, explained in ten minutes, with one thing you can do Monday morning.

Each episode takes one real business problem, pulls out the principle that actually solves it, and hands you the move. Brian Kasday and his co-host work an enduring marketing principle out of the seminar and into a business you would actually recognise. No hype, no jargon, nothing you need a whiteboard for.

Part of The Operator's Canon, from MMS Vegas and The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>The greatest marketing ideas of all time, explained in ten minutes, with one thing you can do Monday morning.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>marketing, small business, direct response, positioning, customer acquisition, pricing strategy, lifetime value, jobs to be done, marketing strategy, business growth, entrepreneurship, copywriting</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Brian Kasday</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>brian@mmsvegas.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>My Leads Ghost After the First Call, Commitment &amp; Consistency</title>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>My Leads Ghost After the First Call, Commitment &amp; Consistency</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf66e80b-5148-4558-9dcc-cc61b22fa56e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/930d0d73</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A B2B consultant keeps having great first calls that go silent before anyone signs, and the usual fix, chase harder, send more follow-up, never moves the number. This episode reframes the disappearing act: an hour of warm agreement is not evidence of intent, so when a prospect has done nothing before the big ask, ghosting costs them nothing. We untangle two related ideas people constantly blur, Cialdini's commitment and consistency (real, voluntary commitments make consistency matter) and its cousin, the foot-in-the-door technique from Freedman and Fraser (1966), and land on the honest operator lesson: a small, real next step is both a gentle nudge and, more usefully, a qualification signal, better than warm words, but not proof. The prospect who won't do the small thing gives you a signal that might otherwise take weeks of follow-up to surface, while a genuine buyer can still whiff it and an unserious one can breeze through it. Plus the boundary where it collapses, a warm contact with no authority to commit. The Monday Move: on your next first call, before you hang up, ask the prospect to send one redacted example of where their process actually breaks, before you talk again.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A B2B consultant keeps having great first calls that go silent before anyone signs, and the usual fix, chase harder, send more follow-up, never moves the number. This episode reframes the disappearing act: an hour of warm agreement is not evidence of intent, so when a prospect has done nothing before the big ask, ghosting costs them nothing. We untangle two related ideas people constantly blur, Cialdini's commitment and consistency (real, voluntary commitments make consistency matter) and its cousin, the foot-in-the-door technique from Freedman and Fraser (1966), and land on the honest operator lesson: a small, real next step is both a gentle nudge and, more usefully, a qualification signal, better than warm words, but not proof. The prospect who won't do the small thing gives you a signal that might otherwise take weeks of follow-up to surface, while a genuine buyer can still whiff it and an unserious one can breeze through it. Plus the boundary where it collapses, a warm contact with no authority to commit. The Monday Move: on your next first call, before you hang up, ask the prospect to send one redacted example of where their process actually breaks, before you talk again.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 04:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/930d0d73/7d75d042.mp3" length="11625537" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>580</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A B2B consultant keeps having great first calls that go silent before anyone signs, and the usual fix, chase harder, send more follow-up, never moves the number. This episode reframes the disappearing act: an hour of warm agreement is not evidence of intent, so when a prospect has done nothing before the big ask, ghosting costs them nothing. We untangle two related ideas people constantly blur, Cialdini's commitment and consistency (real, voluntary commitments make consistency matter) and its cousin, the foot-in-the-door technique from Freedman and Fraser (1966), and land on the honest operator lesson: a small, real next step is both a gentle nudge and, more usefully, a qualification signal, better than warm words, but not proof. The prospect who won't do the small thing gives you a signal that might otherwise take weeks of follow-up to surface, while a genuine buyer can still whiff it and an unserious one can breeze through it. Plus the boundary where it collapses, a warm contact with no authority to commit. The Monday Move: on your next first call, before you hang up, ask the prospect to send one redacted example of where their process actually breaks, before you talk again.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>commitment and consistency, Robert Cialdini, foot-in-the-door, Freedman and Fraser, B2B consulting sales, prospects ghosting, sales follow-up, qualifying prospects, discovery call, direct response marketing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Give Away Tons of Value and Get Nothing Back, Reciprocity</title>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I Give Away Tons of Value and Get Nothing Back, Reciprocity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2802a1a9-32fa-4cc8-bd99-fc54a47db469</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4dc54ad2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A business coach publishes great free guides, runs free discovery calls, and gives away real advice, and almost none of it turns into paid work. It looks like a generosity problem, but it's an ask problem. This episode works through reciprocity, the principle Robert Cialdini put on the map, that receiving something from someone makes us want to give back, and it keeps two things separate: what the psychology actually does (earns you goodwill, a real tendency to reciprocate) and what it doesn't (run your sales process for you). Give freely, but at some point make a clear, specific offer, name the next step, name the price, and ask. Plus where it stops working: reciprocity can't rescue a bad-fit prospect, and free value can't create demand for a paid offer that adds nothing. The Monday Move: on your very next discovery call, before you hang up, say one sentence that names the next step, names the price, and asks if they want the details, then stop talking and let them answer.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A business coach publishes great free guides, runs free discovery calls, and gives away real advice, and almost none of it turns into paid work. It looks like a generosity problem, but it's an ask problem. This episode works through reciprocity, the principle Robert Cialdini put on the map, that receiving something from someone makes us want to give back, and it keeps two things separate: what the psychology actually does (earns you goodwill, a real tendency to reciprocate) and what it doesn't (run your sales process for you). Give freely, but at some point make a clear, specific offer, name the next step, name the price, and ask. Plus where it stops working: reciprocity can't rescue a bad-fit prospect, and free value can't create demand for a paid offer that adds nothing. The Monday Move: on your very next discovery call, before you hang up, say one sentence that names the next step, names the price, and asks if they want the details, then stop talking and let them answer.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 04:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4dc54ad2/7722c6f0.mp3" length="10820439" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>540</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A business coach publishes great free guides, runs free discovery calls, and gives away real advice, and almost none of it turns into paid work. It looks like a generosity problem, but it's an ask problem. This episode works through reciprocity, the principle Robert Cialdini put on the map, that receiving something from someone makes us want to give back, and it keeps two things separate: what the psychology actually does (earns you goodwill, a real tendency to reciprocate) and what it doesn't (run your sales process for you). Give freely, but at some point make a clear, specific offer, name the next step, name the price, and ask. Plus where it stops working: reciprocity can't rescue a bad-fit prospect, and free value can't create demand for a paid offer that adds nothing. The Monday Move: on your very next discovery call, before you hang up, say one sentence that names the next step, names the price, and asks if they want the details, then stop talking and let them answer.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>reciprocity, Robert Cialdini, business coaching, lead generation, discovery calls, converting free to paid, sales asks, direct response marketing, offer strategy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Have Three Tiers and Everyone Picks the Cheapest, the Decoy Effect (and Why I Won’t Build You One)</title>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I Have Three Tiers and Everyone Picks the Cheapest, the Decoy Effect (and Why I Won’t Build You One)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3b332939-4e7a-4d10-8b81-4ec211172c54</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/99664d05</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>You built three pricing tiers, and nearly every customer picks the cheapest one instead of the plan you actually want them on. This episode starts where most decoy-effect advice does, reframing it as a choice-architecture problem, not a discounting one, and then does the thing most tellings skip: it gets the mechanism right and then refuses to sell it. Host Brian Kasday and operator Dave work through asymmetric dominance, demonstrated by Huber, Payne and Puto and popularized by Dan Ariely with the Economist subscription example. The common mislearning is that a decoy has to cost the same as your target, it doesn’t. What matters is that your target beats the decoy on the attributes buyers compare, while the competing option doesn’t, and price is only sometimes one of those attributes. Then the twist: to build a true decoy on Dave’s page, Brian would have to add a plan deliberately worse, one built only to lose to Growth, and Dave wins the ethical point cleanly. Deliberately adding an option designed to lose is just manufacturing a loser, and Brian stops wanting to rescue the tactic. The research is messier than the classroom version, too: the effect is real, but how reliably it transfers into real, messy buying environments is much less tidy, with some realistic and field studies finding weak or null effects. What survives is the true part: people judge options against what’s next to them, a good reason to inspect your pricing comparison before assuming price is the problem. The Monday Move: look at your real tiers on the attributes customers actually care about, check whether one genuinely dominates another, if not, you have tradeoffs, not a decoy, and make those tradeoffs easier to see instead of inventing a loser.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week’s Monday Move: The Operator’s Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>You built three pricing tiers, and nearly every customer picks the cheapest one instead of the plan you actually want them on. This episode starts where most decoy-effect advice does, reframing it as a choice-architecture problem, not a discounting one, and then does the thing most tellings skip: it gets the mechanism right and then refuses to sell it. Host Brian Kasday and operator Dave work through asymmetric dominance, demonstrated by Huber, Payne and Puto and popularized by Dan Ariely with the Economist subscription example. The common mislearning is that a decoy has to cost the same as your target, it doesn’t. What matters is that your target beats the decoy on the attributes buyers compare, while the competing option doesn’t, and price is only sometimes one of those attributes. Then the twist: to build a true decoy on Dave’s page, Brian would have to add a plan deliberately worse, one built only to lose to Growth, and Dave wins the ethical point cleanly. Deliberately adding an option designed to lose is just manufacturing a loser, and Brian stops wanting to rescue the tactic. The research is messier than the classroom version, too: the effect is real, but how reliably it transfers into real, messy buying environments is much less tidy, with some realistic and field studies finding weak or null effects. What survives is the true part: people judge options against what’s next to them, a good reason to inspect your pricing comparison before assuming price is the problem. The Monday Move: look at your real tiers on the attributes customers actually care about, check whether one genuinely dominates another, if not, you have tradeoffs, not a decoy, and make those tradeoffs easier to see instead of inventing a loser.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week’s Monday Move: The Operator’s Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/99664d05/f16d3f21.mp3" length="11015917" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>550</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>You built three pricing tiers, and nearly every customer picks the cheapest one instead of the plan you actually want them on. This episode starts where most decoy-effect advice does, reframing it as a choice-architecture problem, not a discounting one, and then does the thing most tellings skip: it gets the mechanism right and then refuses to sell it. Host Brian Kasday and operator Dave work through asymmetric dominance, demonstrated by Huber, Payne and Puto and popularized by Dan Ariely with the Economist subscription example. The common mislearning is that a decoy has to cost the same as your target, it doesn’t. What matters is that your target beats the decoy on the attributes buyers compare, while the competing option doesn’t, and price is only sometimes one of those attributes. Then the twist: to build a true decoy on Dave’s page, Brian would have to add a plan deliberately worse, one built only to lose to Growth, and Dave wins the ethical point cleanly. Deliberately adding an option designed to lose is just manufacturing a loser, and Brian stops wanting to rescue the tactic. The research is messier than the classroom version, too: the effect is real, but how reliably it transfers into real, messy buying environments is much less tidy, with some realistic and field studies finding weak or null effects. What survives is the true part: people judge options against what’s next to them, a good reason to inspect your pricing comparison before assuming price is the problem. The Monday Move: look at your real tiers on the attributes customers actually care about, check whether one genuinely dominates another, if not, you have tradeoffs, not a decoy, and make those tradeoffs easier to see instead of inventing a loser.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week’s Monday Move: The Operator’s Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>decoy effect, asymmetric dominance, attraction effect, Huber Payne Puto, Dan Ariely, Economist subscription example, pricing tiers, pricing page optimization, choice architecture, behavioral economics, honest pricing, ethical pricing, conversion strategy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Every Client Says I'm Too Expensive, Anchoring</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Every Client Says I'm Too Expensive, Anchoring</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7badc327-4612-4abb-9ddd-c7cd364c73c7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5ee4e4cd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A wedding photographer whose prospects keep flinching at the quote and calling him too expensive doesn't actually have a price problem, he has a first-number problem. Many buyers walk into the consultation with some kind of reference point already in their head, a friend with a camera, a midnight article, a round figure their mom named, and that number quietly becomes the reference point your quote gets judged against. This episode works through anchoring, popularized by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, and pushed into pricing research by Dan Ariely, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec, the tendency for an initial number to become a reference point that can pull later judgments toward it, especially when value is ambiguous. We get into why leading with your cheapest package can create an unfavorable reference point for everything above it, why the premium tier has to be a real offer and not a decoy that eats your credibility, and where the whole thing stops working, it bends the undecided middle, but it can't conjure money that isn't there. Monday's move: reorder your pricing so the first number a prospect sees is your highest real collection, not your cheapest.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A wedding photographer whose prospects keep flinching at the quote and calling him too expensive doesn't actually have a price problem, he has a first-number problem. Many buyers walk into the consultation with some kind of reference point already in their head, a friend with a camera, a midnight article, a round figure their mom named, and that number quietly becomes the reference point your quote gets judged against. This episode works through anchoring, popularized by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, and pushed into pricing research by Dan Ariely, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec, the tendency for an initial number to become a reference point that can pull later judgments toward it, especially when value is ambiguous. We get into why leading with your cheapest package can create an unfavorable reference point for everything above it, why the premium tier has to be a real offer and not a decoy that eats your credibility, and where the whole thing stops working, it bends the undecided middle, but it can't conjure money that isn't there. Monday's move: reorder your pricing so the first number a prospect sees is your highest real collection, not your cheapest.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5ee4e4cd/b6d8a895.mp3" length="11068577" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>552</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A wedding photographer whose prospects keep flinching at the quote and calling him too expensive doesn't actually have a price problem, he has a first-number problem. Many buyers walk into the consultation with some kind of reference point already in their head, a friend with a camera, a midnight article, a round figure their mom named, and that number quietly becomes the reference point your quote gets judged against. This episode works through anchoring, popularized by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, and pushed into pricing research by Dan Ariely, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec, the tendency for an initial number to become a reference point that can pull later judgments toward it, especially when value is ambiguous. We get into why leading with your cheapest package can create an unfavorable reference point for everything above it, why the premium tier has to be a real offer and not a decoy that eats your credibility, and where the whole thing stops working, it bends the undecided middle, but it can't conjure money that isn't there. Monday's move: reorder your pricing so the first number a prospect sees is your highest real collection, not your cheapest.</p>
<p>Written versionand this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>anchoring, pricing psychology, wedding photographer pricing, Dan Ariely, Kahneman and Tversky, price objections, value framing, premium pricing, direct response marketing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm Doing Every Channel and None Is Working, the Bullseye Framework</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I'm Doing Every Channel and None Is Working, the Bullseye Framework</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea8c1f7c-3bf1-41fe-8bf3-b6117caba855</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a0691a9b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>An app founder is doing a little of every marketing channel, exhausted, and nothing is moving. Brian and Dave diagnose the real problem — everything running at ten percent — and get into the Bullseye Framework popularized by Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares in "Traction": brainstorm all nineteen channels, test the best two or three cheaply, then focus on the one that shows traction and line up the next before it fades. They cover why founders overweight the channels they already know, why a solo operator tests sequentially, and the hard limit — no channel fixes a leaky product. Monday Move: for the next two weeks, pause every acquisition channel except the one showing the clearest real signal, and put all your effort there.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>An app founder is doing a little of every marketing channel, exhausted, and nothing is moving. Brian and Dave diagnose the real problem — everything running at ten percent — and get into the Bullseye Framework popularized by Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares in "Traction": brainstorm all nineteen channels, test the best two or three cheaply, then focus on the one that shows traction and line up the next before it fades. They cover why founders overweight the channels they already know, why a solo operator tests sequentially, and the hard limit — no channel fixes a leaky product. Monday Move: for the next two weeks, pause every acquisition channel except the one showing the clearest real signal, and put all your effort there.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a0691a9b/f28ba294.mp3" length="10017535" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/11HHBzrdg9u3DWq_j_Ucy9VRO_JH674vogKMww2_Icg/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8wZDE4/MzFlMWZjNjIyNGE3/NDNjZDJjZDk4ZDk1/MTVjNC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>500</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>An app founder is doing a little of every marketing channel, exhausted, and nothing is moving. Brian and Dave diagnose the real problem — everything running at ten percent — and get into the Bullseye Framework popularized by Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares in "Traction": brainstorm all nineteen channels, test the best two or three cheaply, then focus on the one that shows traction and line up the next before it fades. They cover why founders overweight the channels they already know, why a solo operator tests sequentially, and the hard limit — no channel fixes a leaky product. Monday Move: for the next two weeks, pause every acquisition channel except the one showing the clearest real signal, and put all your effort there.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>bullseye framework, Traction, Gabriel Weinberg, Justin Mares, traction channels, customer acquisition, marketing channels, focus, startup, testing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Half My Ad Money Is Wasted, Scientific Advertising</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Half My Ad Money Is Wasted, Scientific Advertising</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2fb828e9-06be-47b3-b3da-6cfe01ed5a94</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6884ed32</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A retail owner spends real money across Facebook, radio, print, and Google, and can't say which channel brought in her last twenty customers. Brian and Dave reframe "how do I spend smarter" as "you can't see," and get into the measurement-and-testing discipline Claude Hopkins formalized in "Scientific Advertising" in 1923 — making every channel raise its hand, testing one variable at a time, setting the sample size before you start, and reason-why copy. They also cover the honest limits: testing needs volume, and it optimizes the choice in front of you, not the choice you never thought to make. Monday Move: pick your single most expensive channel and give it one way to prove itself — a unique code, a dedicated number, or a landing page only it points to.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A retail owner spends real money across Facebook, radio, print, and Google, and can't say which channel brought in her last twenty customers. Brian and Dave reframe "how do I spend smarter" as "you can't see," and get into the measurement-and-testing discipline Claude Hopkins formalized in "Scientific Advertising" in 1923 — making every channel raise its hand, testing one variable at a time, setting the sample size before you start, and reason-why copy. They also cover the honest limits: testing needs volume, and it optimizes the choice in front of you, not the choice you never thought to make. Monday Move: pick your single most expensive channel and give it one way to prove itself — a unique code, a dedicated number, or a landing page only it points to.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6884ed32/1ea4b7e1.mp3" length="10588537" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/FGPfPVJXtdGlalJcY-KhojVhVdbXzQEmzAQpH2XrZGQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mNjAz/MWY1MzhlMDNmNWRj/YjZiZTc3N2I2NDJi/MzY1MC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>528</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A retail owner spends real money across Facebook, radio, print, and Google, and can't say which channel brought in her last twenty customers. Brian and Dave reframe "how do I spend smarter" as "you can't see," and get into the measurement-and-testing discipline Claude Hopkins formalized in "Scientific Advertising" in 1923 — making every channel raise its hand, testing one variable at a time, setting the sample size before you start, and reason-why copy. They also cover the honest limits: testing needs volume, and it optimizes the choice in front of you, not the choice you never thought to make. Monday Move: pick your single most expensive channel and give it one way to prove itself — a unique code, a dedicated number, or a landing page only it points to.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>scientific advertising, Claude Hopkins, testing, tracking, attribution, split testing, direct response, measurement, reason-why copy, small business</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Meeting Goes Great but the Proposal Dies, the Principles of Persuasion</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Meeting Goes Great but the Proposal Dies, the Principles of Persuasion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71232753-dcde-4838-a12b-f447f254485e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d4218df2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A financial advisor has great first meetings and then watches clean proposals die on "let me think about it." Brian and Dave find what the ones who do sign show up already carrying — proof and trust from other people — and walk all seven of the principles of persuasion popularized by Robert Cialdini in "Influence," with unity added later in "Pre-Suasion." They get into using only the signals that are actually true, the ethical line between persuasion and manipulation, and — because this is a regulated business — why a client's permission is not the compliance standard for a testimonial. Monday Move: choose one real client story and put it through whatever advertising-compliance review governs your practice; if it clears, it becomes your proposal's social proof.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A financial advisor has great first meetings and then watches clean proposals die on "let me think about it." Brian and Dave find what the ones who do sign show up already carrying — proof and trust from other people — and walk all seven of the principles of persuasion popularized by Robert Cialdini in "Influence," with unity added later in "Pre-Suasion." They get into using only the signals that are actually true, the ethical line between persuasion and manipulation, and — because this is a regulated business — why a client's permission is not the compliance standard for a testimonial. Monday Move: choose one real client story and put it through whatever advertising-compliance review governs your practice; if it clears, it becomes your proposal's social proof.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d4218df2/7c8fe1f8.mp3" length="11406062" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/tFG38ioyVm9G5YYoNOcVQjLD0_Ln4-4QTcAVsdRL9as/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xMGFj/NDY5NjgyNmUyODYy/ZWNjMjdhZjkzZTQ1/MzAyZS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>569</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A financial advisor has great first meetings and then watches clean proposals die on "let me think about it." Brian and Dave find what the ones who do sign show up already carrying — proof and trust from other people — and walk all seven of the principles of persuasion popularized by Robert Cialdini in "Influence," with unity added later in "Pre-Suasion." They get into using only the signals that are actually true, the ethical line between persuasion and manipulation, and — because this is a regulated business — why a client's permission is not the compliance standard for a testimonial. Monday Move: choose one real client story and put it through whatever advertising-compliance review governs your practice; if it clears, it becomes your proposal's social proof.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>persuasion, Robert Cialdini, Influence, social proof, reciprocity, authority, scarcity, financial advisor, proposals, ethics</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Every New Customer Costs Me More, the Marketing Hourglass</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Every New Customer Costs Me More, the Marketing Hourglass</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49f72391-bc4d-4519-9534-42d777127eb4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1b7c3a70</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A dental practice is on an acquisition treadmill — every new patient comes from ads that cost more each year, and nothing is built for the patients they already have. Brian and Dave move the problem from "buy more patients" to the back half of the marketing hourglass, the seven-stage model popularized by John Jantsch in Duct Tape Marketing: Know, Like, Trust, Try, Buy — and then Repeat and Refer, where much of the profit hides. They walk each stage for the practice, the usually-skipped "Try," how to invite referrals without being pushy, and why it has to be a system instead of a mood. Monday Move: write the one sequence that fires after a patient's first visit — a check-in, a genuinely useful note, and one referral invitation, with timing — on a single page.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A dental practice is on an acquisition treadmill — every new patient comes from ads that cost more each year, and nothing is built for the patients they already have. Brian and Dave move the problem from "buy more patients" to the back half of the marketing hourglass, the seven-stage model popularized by John Jantsch in Duct Tape Marketing: Know, Like, Trust, Try, Buy — and then Repeat and Refer, where much of the profit hides. They walk each stage for the practice, the usually-skipped "Try," how to invite referrals without being pushy, and why it has to be a system instead of a mood. Monday Move: write the one sequence that fires after a patient's first visit — a check-in, a genuinely useful note, and one referral invitation, with timing — on a single page.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1b7c3a70/425cefae.mp3" length="11229969" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_LIUh7dtS080AeEImoCiccc9_3dfFE8AuZP46bMxRqc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80MDdk/MGY1NDRjMjMwN2Y2/YWVlZThlNTI5YmU0/YzE0Yy5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>561</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A dental practice is on an acquisition treadmill — every new patient comes from ads that cost more each year, and nothing is built for the patients they already have. Brian and Dave move the problem from "buy more patients" to the back half of the marketing hourglass, the seven-stage model popularized by John Jantsch in Duct Tape Marketing: Know, Like, Trust, Try, Buy — and then Repeat and Refer, where much of the profit hides. They walk each stage for the practice, the usually-skipped "Try," how to invite referrals without being pushy, and why it has to be a system instead of a mood. Monday Move: write the one sequence that fires after a patient's first visit — a check-in, a genuinely useful note, and one referral invitation, with timing — on a single page.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>marketing hourglass, John Jantsch, Duct Tape Marketing, referrals, retention, repeat business, customer journey, know like trust, dental practice, small business</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We Were Flying, Then We Stalled, Crossing the Chasm</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>We Were Flying, Then We Stalled, Crossing the Chasm</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c86f90a-6bb7-4ce3-be53-ae47382cfc3b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8157eea2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A B2B software founder rode a wave of scrappy early customers, then watched growth stall as pragmatic buyers keep asking "who else like us is using this?" Brian and Dave name the wall — the chasm, from the playbook Geoffrey Moore popularized in "Crossing the Chasm," building on the older technology-adoption lifecycle. They get into why the vision pitch that won early adopters is noise to the mainstream, why references carry the most weight inside a segment, and the two-move fix — a narrow beachhead plus the "whole product" — along with where the model doesn't apply. Monday Move: write one sentence — "We are the obvious choice for ______" — and fill the blank with a single narrow segment. No "and," no second market.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A B2B software founder rode a wave of scrappy early customers, then watched growth stall as pragmatic buyers keep asking "who else like us is using this?" Brian and Dave name the wall — the chasm, from the playbook Geoffrey Moore popularized in "Crossing the Chasm," building on the older technology-adoption lifecycle. They get into why the vision pitch that won early adopters is noise to the mainstream, why references carry the most weight inside a segment, and the two-move fix — a narrow beachhead plus the "whole product" — along with where the model doesn't apply. Monday Move: write one sentence — "We are the obvious choice for ______" — and fill the blank with a single narrow segment. No "and," no second market.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8157eea2/5261de4d.mp3" length="11170920" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/WAIspoaDf5OcN8J5GsUEM_kJ_MEtRqEIhhuwHtprCFU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yZWMx/NjhlMzA0N2YwNmM2/ODcxNjVlOWI4OWZj/ZTZiZi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>558</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A B2B software founder rode a wave of scrappy early customers, then watched growth stall as pragmatic buyers keep asking "who else like us is using this?" Brian and Dave name the wall — the chasm, from the playbook Geoffrey Moore popularized in "Crossing the Chasm," building on the older technology-adoption lifecycle. They get into why the vision pitch that won early adopters is noise to the mainstream, why references carry the most weight inside a segment, and the two-move fix — a narrow beachhead plus the "whole product" — along with where the model doesn't apply. Monday Move: write one sentence — "We are the obvious choice for ______" — and fill the blank with a single narrow segment. No "and," no second market.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>crossing the chasm, Geoffrey Moore, technology adoption, early adopters, pragmatists, beachhead, whole product, B2B, SaaS, go-to-market</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Can't Afford to Buy a Customer, Customer Lifetime Value</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I Can't Afford to Buy a Customer, Customer Lifetime Value</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35dbab9b-7b80-443d-8014-4d8f2f1096ab</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a31c6ded</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A coffee subscription-box founder caps acquisition at fifteen dollars — the price of the first box — and every channel looks tapped out. Brian and Dave reframe the cap as the ceiling he built himself and get into customer lifetime value: developed by database marketers Robert and Kate Kestnbaum, put in print by Shaw and Stone, and later made practical for small operators by Jay Abraham and Dan Kennedy. They cover the four-part math in gross profit, why payback period and cash can bankrupt a "profitable" business, how the three-to-one ratio came out of SaaS, and the quieter game of raising lifetime value itself. Monday Move: do the LTV math once — order value, frequency, margin, and honest average lifespan, in gross profit — set it next to what you spend to acquire a customer, and just look at the gap.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A coffee subscription-box founder caps acquisition at fifteen dollars — the price of the first box — and every channel looks tapped out. Brian and Dave reframe the cap as the ceiling he built himself and get into customer lifetime value: developed by database marketers Robert and Kate Kestnbaum, put in print by Shaw and Stone, and later made practical for small operators by Jay Abraham and Dan Kennedy. They cover the four-part math in gross profit, why payback period and cash can bankrupt a "profitable" business, how the three-to-one ratio came out of SaaS, and the quieter game of raising lifetime value itself. Monday Move: do the LTV math once — order value, frequency, margin, and honest average lifespan, in gross profit — set it next to what you spend to acquire a customer, and just look at the gap.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a31c6ded/e5ccd35c.mp3" length="11234671" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/0fC_iIN2wZYI1doDb7pAxadzEfP-C86ewYh9BC_tE_s/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS85Y2U0/MzQzOGZjY2YyMmZh/OTYzNTBhNjliYzUy/MTE4MC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>561</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A coffee subscription-box founder caps acquisition at fifteen dollars — the price of the first box — and every channel looks tapped out. Brian and Dave reframe the cap as the ceiling he built himself and get into customer lifetime value: developed by database marketers Robert and Kate Kestnbaum, put in print by Shaw and Stone, and later made practical for small operators by Jay Abraham and Dan Kennedy. They cover the four-part math in gross profit, why payback period and cash can bankrupt a "profitable" business, how the three-to-one ratio came out of SaaS, and the quieter game of raising lifetime value itself. Monday Move: do the LTV math once — order value, frequency, margin, and honest average lifespan, in gross profit — set it next to what you spend to acquire a customer, and just look at the gap.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>customer lifetime value, LTV, CLV, unit economics, payback period, CAC, retention, subscription, Kestnbaum, ad spend</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm Underpriced and Scared to Fix It, Price Elasticity</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I'm Underpriced and Scared to Fix It, Price Elasticity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ab78c327-8bc5-4faa-82b6-123efd2e583d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0002c0f8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A bookkeeper has held her rates flat for five years because she's sure raising them means everybody walks. Brian and Dave separate the fear from the number and get into price elasticity of demand — the measure, formalized by Alfred Marshall in "Principles of Economics," of how much volume actually moves when price moves — and why specialized, high-trust, high-switching-cost work is a strong candidate for inelastic demand, though a candidate isn't proof. They walk the napkin math, why you test on new proposals before touching your existing book, how to segment by client, and where the whole idea flips. Monday Move: on the very next proposal you send, quote it fifteen percent higher — no apology, no preemptive discount — and watch what happens. One data point, not proof.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A bookkeeper has held her rates flat for five years because she's sure raising them means everybody walks. Brian and Dave separate the fear from the number and get into price elasticity of demand — the measure, formalized by Alfred Marshall in "Principles of Economics," of how much volume actually moves when price moves — and why specialized, high-trust, high-switching-cost work is a strong candidate for inelastic demand, though a candidate isn't proof. They walk the napkin math, why you test on new proposals before touching your existing book, how to segment by client, and where the whole idea flips. Monday Move: on the very next proposal you send, quote it fifteen percent higher — no apology, no preemptive discount — and watch what happens. One data point, not proof.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0002c0f8/d5cb8297.mp3" length="11234664" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/b9_vznUVz5lQptNAS_NAm74YnSkqN3q6Cf0fjW01JN0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8wODQw/YmMwZWE2MjkyNTI5/MzNkMzcxMjA3ZDMy/NDAyZi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>561</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A bookkeeper has held her rates flat for five years because she's sure raising them means everybody walks. Brian and Dave separate the fear from the number and get into price elasticity of demand — the measure, formalized by Alfred Marshall in "Principles of Economics," of how much volume actually moves when price moves — and why specialized, high-trust, high-switching-cost work is a strong candidate for inelastic demand, though a candidate isn't proof. They walk the napkin math, why you test on new proposals before touching your existing book, how to segment by client, and where the whole idea flips. Monday Move: on the very next proposal you send, quote it fifteen percent higher — no apology, no preemptive discount — and watch what happens. One data point, not proof.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>price elasticity, pricing, raising prices, Alfred Marshall, inelastic demand, switching costs, value-based pricing, service business, close rate, small business</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My Cold Ads Get Clicks and No Sales, Market Awareness</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>My Cold Ads Get Clicks and No Sales, Market Awareness</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1abb0aad-4138-491b-b43a-52d4fa31a796</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/11789ff1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A skincare brand is running cold "shop now, twenty percent off" ads to broad audiences and burning money, sure the fix is flashier creative. Brian and Dave reframe it as a message-to-audience mismatch and get into the five awareness stages and the market-sophistication ladder popularized by Eugene Schwartz in "Breakthrough Advertising" — why a closing line falls flat on people who haven't decided they have the problem yet, and how to match the message to what the buyer actually knows. They cover diagnosing awareness and sophistication from real evidence instead of guessing, and the trap of over-engineering a market that's still fresh. Monday Move: take your best cold ad and write one alternate that doesn't mention the product at all — just names the problem in the customer's words — and run the two against each other on the same audience.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A skincare brand is running cold "shop now, twenty percent off" ads to broad audiences and burning money, sure the fix is flashier creative. Brian and Dave reframe it as a message-to-audience mismatch and get into the five awareness stages and the market-sophistication ladder popularized by Eugene Schwartz in "Breakthrough Advertising" — why a closing line falls flat on people who haven't decided they have the problem yet, and how to match the message to what the buyer actually knows. They cover diagnosing awareness and sophistication from real evidence instead of guessing, and the trap of over-engineering a market that's still fresh. Monday Move: take your best cold ad and write one alternate that doesn't mention the product at all — just names the problem in the customer's words — and run the two against each other on the same audience.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/11789ff1/15d5fa14.mp3" length="11610825" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Rr5V4-5CHFffwjD5VfmtbDpcceKAtxMruvLsXsV4M1o/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yNWJl/YmM3M2UxNmI3M2Ux/NjBjYzE5OGEwN2Q1/YmUzNi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>580</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A skincare brand is running cold "shop now, twenty percent off" ads to broad audiences and burning money, sure the fix is flashier creative. Brian and Dave reframe it as a message-to-audience mismatch and get into the five awareness stages and the market-sophistication ladder popularized by Eugene Schwartz in "Breakthrough Advertising" — why a closing line falls flat on people who haven't decided they have the problem yet, and how to match the message to what the buyer actually knows. They cover diagnosing awareness and sophistication from real evidence instead of guessing, and the trap of over-engineering a market that's still fresh. Monday Move: take your best cold ad and write one alternate that doesn't mention the product at all — just names the problem in the customer's words — and run the two against each other on the same audience.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>market awareness, Eugene Schwartz, Breakthrough Advertising, awareness stages, market sophistication, cold traffic, DTC, Facebook ads, ad copy, messaging</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>They Love My Free Stuff and Won't Buy, Voice of Customer</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>They Love My Free Stuff and Won't Buy, Voice of Customer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac87d3d1-3312-4f1c-8d7f-eeae0ba3fd59</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ea4f3fb1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>An online course creator has a beloved free following and a sales page that gets traffic and almost no buyers — and keeps rewriting it in her own words instead of her customers'. Brian and Dave get into Voice of Customer: the discipline — the formal term traces to Griffin and Hauser in 1993, and conversion copywriters like Joanna Wiebe later turned it into review mining — of building your copy out of the exact language customers already use for the problem, before they ever met you. They cover how to mine DMs, reviews, and a few real conversations, how to sort what you hear into the headline, the promise, and the objection, and where Voice of Customer can't help. Monday Move: message five buyers and five people who signed up but never bought, and ask them one question — "What was going on for you right before you looked for help with this?" — then collect the sentences.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>An online course creator has a beloved free following and a sales page that gets traffic and almost no buyers — and keeps rewriting it in her own words instead of her customers'. Brian and Dave get into Voice of Customer: the discipline — the formal term traces to Griffin and Hauser in 1993, and conversion copywriters like Joanna Wiebe later turned it into review mining — of building your copy out of the exact language customers already use for the problem, before they ever met you. They cover how to mine DMs, reviews, and a few real conversations, how to sort what you hear into the headline, the promise, and the objection, and where Voice of Customer can't help. Monday Move: message five buyers and five people who signed up but never bought, and ask them one question — "What was going on for you right before you looked for help with this?" — then collect the sentences.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ea4f3fb1/11e5fb0b.mp3" length="9860627" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/pKF9QO7s3XxMCO8u6RKAjtQQrYe-nStzH0ZaIa65Qs8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83Yzhl/YTEyMzFhNWIxOGNm/ODU2OTQyMzExYjQw/YTE4ZS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>492</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>An online course creator has a beloved free following and a sales page that gets traffic and almost no buyers — and keeps rewriting it in her own words instead of her customers'. Brian and Dave get into Voice of Customer: the discipline — the formal term traces to Griffin and Hauser in 1993, and conversion copywriters like Joanna Wiebe later turned it into review mining — of building your copy out of the exact language customers already use for the problem, before they ever met you. They cover how to mine DMs, reviews, and a few real conversations, how to sort what you hear into the headline, the promise, and the objection, and where Voice of Customer can't help. Monday Move: message five buyers and five people who signed up but never bought, and ask them one question — "What was going on for you right before you looked for help with this?" — then collect the sentences.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Voice of Customer, VoC, conversion copywriting, review mining, sales page, messaging, copywriting, customer research, Joanna Wiebe, small business</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Blast Thousands and Nobody Bites, the Dream 100</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I Blast Thousands and Nobody Bites, the Dream 100</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f50eaf22-8309-400f-b8e0-a8b0dc5d7c19</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d3b1c22</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A commercial landscaping company is buying lead lists and cold-emailing and cold-calling thousands of businesses across a fifty-mile radius — and getting near silence. The usual advice is a bigger list and more volume. Brian and Dave get into why that's a concentration problem, not a volume one: the idea, popularized by Chet Holmes in "The Ultimate Sales Machine," that you win by working a finite, named list of your best-fit "dream" accounts — repeatedly, for months — instead of spraying the whole market. They cover why the same effort aimed at fewer, higher-value accounts (or the referral partners who serve them) beats blasting everyone, what it actually costs in ego and patience, where the four-month drought in Holmes's own campaign fits, and where the Dream 100 doesn't apply. Monday Move: pick the single account you most wish you had, spend fifteen minutes learning their business, and send one genuinely useful note — no pitch, no ask.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A commercial landscaping company is buying lead lists and cold-emailing and cold-calling thousands of businesses across a fifty-mile radius — and getting near silence. The usual advice is a bigger list and more volume. Brian and Dave get into why that's a concentration problem, not a volume one: the idea, popularized by Chet Holmes in "The Ultimate Sales Machine," that you win by working a finite, named list of your best-fit "dream" accounts — repeatedly, for months — instead of spraying the whole market. They cover why the same effort aimed at fewer, higher-value accounts (or the referral partners who serve them) beats blasting everyone, what it actually costs in ego and patience, where the four-month drought in Holmes's own campaign fits, and where the Dream 100 doesn't apply. Monday Move: pick the single account you most wish you had, spend fifteen minutes learning their business, and send one genuinely useful note — no pitch, no ask.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 21:52:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2d3b1c22/ef00a449.mp3" length="11188156" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/tNjcG8Jzb--yKoWZqrEkIMEvSoadXJHxkIk4lBiG34U/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lNmFl/NTgzMDgyYmMxZTVi/OWQ4ZTgwMGY4NTQz/YjAzMC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>558</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A commercial landscaping company is buying lead lists and cold-emailing and cold-calling thousands of businesses across a fifty-mile radius — and getting near silence. The usual advice is a bigger list and more volume. Brian and Dave get into why that's a concentration problem, not a volume one: the idea, popularized by Chet Holmes in "The Ultimate Sales Machine," that you win by working a finite, named list of your best-fit "dream" accounts — repeatedly, for months — instead of spraying the whole market. They cover why the same effort aimed at fewer, higher-value accounts (or the referral partners who serve them) beats blasting everyone, what it actually costs in ego and patience, where the four-month drought in Holmes's own campaign fits, and where the Dream 100 doesn't apply. Monday Move: pick the single account you most wish you had, spend fifteen minutes learning their business, and send one genuinely useful note — no pitch, no ask.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Dream 100, Chet Holmes, The Ultimate Sales Machine, B2B sales, lead generation, cold outreach, prospecting, referral partners, sales strategy, small business</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>They Admit It's Better and Still Won't Switch, Loss Aversion</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>They Admit It's Better and Still Won't Switch, Loss Aversion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">541fd81b-86da-4f9d-8a1c-6d8c1189265a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0597f67c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A SaaS founder built a genuinely better tool — faster, cleaner, does things the incumbent can't — and prospects agree it's better and still won't switch. Brian and Dave get into why "better" often isn't the whole thing standing in the way: buyers aren't only comparing your product to the incumbent's, they're weighing the pain of switching against the pain of staying — and, as Kahneman and Tversky's work on loss aversion suggests, a loss can weigh more heavily than an equal-sized gain. They cover how to shrink the real cost of switching, how to make the quiet cost of staying visible, and the honest limit — sometimes staying put is the rational call. Monday Move: call one prospect who told you the product was better and still didn't switch, and ask one question — "What, specifically, felt risky about moving?"</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A SaaS founder built a genuinely better tool — faster, cleaner, does things the incumbent can't — and prospects agree it's better and still won't switch. Brian and Dave get into why "better" often isn't the whole thing standing in the way: buyers aren't only comparing your product to the incumbent's, they're weighing the pain of switching against the pain of staying — and, as Kahneman and Tversky's work on loss aversion suggests, a loss can weigh more heavily than an equal-sized gain. They cover how to shrink the real cost of switching, how to make the quiet cost of staying visible, and the honest limit — sometimes staying put is the rational call. Monday Move: call one prospect who told you the product was better and still didn't switch, and ask one question — "What, specifically, felt risky about moving?"</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:57:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0597f67c/afbb2edb.mp3" length="9814137" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/kK4xd6QWoUYjnyME5UaYEeiKJAPNgeXxe1oXlFWlxQY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yNTc4/NzUwYTNjMzdiZTIz/MjYxZDEyYmJhZWFl/ZTc1Zi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>490</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A SaaS founder built a genuinely better tool — faster, cleaner, does things the incumbent can't — and prospects agree it's better and still won't switch. Brian and Dave get into why "better" often isn't the whole thing standing in the way: buyers aren't only comparing your product to the incumbent's, they're weighing the pain of switching against the pain of staying — and, as Kahneman and Tversky's work on loss aversion suggests, a loss can weigh more heavily than an equal-sized gain. They cover how to shrink the real cost of switching, how to make the quiet cost of staying visible, and the honest limit — sometimes staying put is the rational call. Monday Move: call one prospect who told you the product was better and still didn't switch, and ask one question — "What, specifically, felt risky about moving?"</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>loss aversion, Kahneman, Tversky, prospect theory, SaaS, switching costs, churn, sales, behavioral economics, customer retention</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Logo Was Never the Problem, Positioning</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Logo Was Never the Problem, Positioning</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">01ad4942-f6bb-404b-bd1c-926240b23bb0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/01a4cfcf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A life coach who gets real results is drowning in a market where everyone sounds exactly like her — and the usual advice (better logo, better colors, post more) misses what's actually wrong. Brian and Dave get into why that's a positioning problem, not a branding one: the idea, popularized by Al Ries and Jack Trout, that being better isn't enough if people can't quickly tell why you're different — or file you somewhere specific in their head. They work through the four questions that force a real position, why narrowing your audience feels like turning away money (and usually isn't), and where a sharp position stops working. Monday Move: replace your bio with one sentence — "I help [this specific person] get [this specific outcome] without [the thing they hate about the usual path]" — and let the right people find themselves in it.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A life coach who gets real results is drowning in a market where everyone sounds exactly like her — and the usual advice (better logo, better colors, post more) misses what's actually wrong. Brian and Dave get into why that's a positioning problem, not a branding one: the idea, popularized by Al Ries and Jack Trout, that being better isn't enough if people can't quickly tell why you're different — or file you somewhere specific in their head. They work through the four questions that force a real position, why narrowing your audience feels like turning away money (and usually isn't), and where a sharp position stops working. Monday Move: replace your bio with one sentence — "I help [this specific person] get [this specific outcome] without [the thing they hate about the usual path]" — and let the right people find themselves in it.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:55:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/01a4cfcf/a89c2207.mp3" length="7994936" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/5f-6YCAZMk82h5s6_cEBQInPY8A2XqbSGA4_3uezZYk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lNmZh/YWQ2NzkzZWM1NWI2/M2MwYjA0ZGQxNmY4/ZTNkMS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>399</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A life coach who gets real results is drowning in a market where everyone sounds exactly like her — and the usual advice (better logo, better colors, post more) misses what's actually wrong. Brian and Dave get into why that's a positioning problem, not a branding one: the idea, popularized by Al Ries and Jack Trout, that being better isn't enough if people can't quickly tell why you're different — or file you somewhere specific in their head. They work through the four questions that force a real position, why narrowing your audience feels like turning away money (and usually isn't), and where a sharp position stops working. Monday Move: replace your bio with one sentence — "I help [this specific person] get [this specific outcome] without [the thing they hate about the usual path]" — and let the right people find themselves in it.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>positioning, Al Ries, Jack Trout, marketing strategy, differentiation, niche, small business, life coach, branding, standing out</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>They Cancel and Say the Food Was Great, Jobs to Be Done</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>They Cancel and Say the Food Was Great, Jobs to Be Done</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f3e59359-f284-4ca8-ba52-bec0d5b3687b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2ad0c429</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave's meal-prep customers churn after a month or two — and rate the food five stars on the way out. Everyone says add menu variety. Brian says the food was never the job. Using Clayton Christensen's Jobs to Be Done, we dig for what customers actually hired the service to do, why the real competitor is the drive-thru and not the other meal box, and the five-customer phone call that surfaces the real job. Plus a Monday Move you can run tomorrow.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave's meal-prep customers churn after a month or two — and rate the food five stars on the way out. Everyone says add menu variety. Brian says the food was never the job. Using Clayton Christensen's Jobs to Be Done, we dig for what customers actually hired the service to do, why the real competitor is the drive-thru and not the other meal box, and the five-customer phone call that surfaces the real job. Plus a Monday Move you can run tomorrow.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:42:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2ad0c429/7f22a24c.mp3" length="9294813" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/GvBOPOJx6nbVPFSwtzrKqhnBxFSrS1-kiPxtB6l-NzE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jN2Rk/Y2IyMjhiOTdjMWQz/YjhiMjdiOTFmNjA5/OTgwZS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>464</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave's meal-prep customers churn after a month or two — and rate the food five stars on the way out. Everyone says add menu variety. Brian says the food was never the job. Using Clayton Christensen's Jobs to Be Done, we dig for what customers actually hired the service to do, why the real competitor is the drive-thru and not the other meal box, and the five-customer phone call that surfaces the real job. Plus a Monday Move you can run tomorrow.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>jobs to be done, Clayton Christensen, customer retention, churn, meal prep, positioning, product market fit, small business marketing, MMS Vegas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My Free Trial Is Packed and Nobody Buys, the Value Equation</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>My Free Trial Is Packed and Nobody Buys, the Value Equation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1864e6ec-a119-44fe-942f-2d2e89a4c459</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ac0523cd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave's gym runs a free week that packs the room and converts almost nobody. Everyone says drop the price, extend the trial, or hire a closer. Brian says the free trial itself is quietly destroying value — and reframes the whole thing with Alex Hormozi's Value Equation: the outcome people want, the odds they give themselves, the time it takes, and the effort it costs. What your first week actually proves, how to make it prove the thing that sells, and the Monday Move that tests it without touching your price.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave's gym runs a free week that packs the room and converts almost nobody. Everyone says drop the price, extend the trial, or hire a closer. Brian says the free trial itself is quietly destroying value — and reframes the whole thing with Alex Hormozi's Value Equation: the outcome people want, the odds they give themselves, the time it takes, and the effort it costs. What your first week actually proves, how to make it prove the thing that sells, and the Monday Move that tests it without touching your price.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:38:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ac0523cd/f53d7c0d.mp3" length="9688225" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/q7SvzTYD4pufsg7yqTTW-_lIvFtHqIK3UdQqqABLt8g/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jYTJh/OGNmMjgxODM0ODk1/YTUxNjM5ZGE3MmJi/ODU2Yi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>483</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave's gym runs a free week that packs the room and converts almost nobody. Everyone says drop the price, extend the trial, or hire a closer. Brian says the free trial itself is quietly destroying value — and reframes the whole thing with Alex Hormozi's Value Equation: the outcome people want, the odds they give themselves, the time it takes, and the effort it costs. What your first week actually proves, how to make it prove the thing that sells, and the Monday Move that tests it without touching your price.</p><p>Written version and this week's Monday Move: The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>value equation, Alex Hormozi, 100M offers, gym marketing, free trial conversion, onboarding, membership sales, small business marketing, MMS Vegas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cheapest Quote That Still Lost, the Strategy of Preeminence</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Cheapest Quote That Still Lost, the Strategy of Preeminence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b2d2665-938e-447e-8d3f-65f91b1eba82</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f9a7176b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave runs a three-truck HVAC shop and just lost a furnace job he'd underbid by six hundred bucks — and everyone's telling him he needs better marketing. Brian says it isn't a marketing problem at all. We take Jay Abraham's Strategy of Preeminence out of the seminar and into a customer's basement: the honest recommendation that costs you the sale, the one useful message a week, the referral it earns, and why "just Dave" beats the big regional outfit right now. One idea, worked all the way through — plus a Monday Move you can run this week. </p><p>The written version and this week's Monday Move live in The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave runs a three-truck HVAC shop and just lost a furnace job he'd underbid by six hundred bucks — and everyone's telling him he needs better marketing. Brian says it isn't a marketing problem at all. We take Jay Abraham's Strategy of Preeminence out of the seminar and into a customer's basement: the honest recommendation that costs you the sale, the one useful message a week, the referral it earns, and why "just Dave" beats the big regional outfit right now. One idea, worked all the way through — plus a Monday Move you can run this week. </p><p>The written version and this week's Monday Move live in The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:37:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Kasday</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f9a7176b/3a1ae8cd.mp3" length="13251335" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian Kasday</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/wOCy3hBbgo2XlGAnkpY0kygprNquPcrzoCDFtga1tzo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83MjU2/OGRkZDJkYTE3ZTdl/MDE3ZGFhMGIyNTZj/YTg2YS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>662</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dave runs a three-truck HVAC shop and just lost a furnace job he'd underbid by six hundred bucks — and everyone's telling him he needs better marketing. Brian says it isn't a marketing problem at all. We take Jay Abraham's Strategy of Preeminence out of the seminar and into a customer's basement: the honest recommendation that costs you the sale, the one useful message a week, the referral it earns, and why "just Dave" beats the big regional outfit right now. One idea, worked all the way through — plus a Monday Move you can run this week. </p><p>The written version and this week's Monday Move live in The Operator's Library at mmsvegas.com.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>strategy of preeminence, Jay Abraham, small business marketing, customer trust, trusted advisor, referrals, word of mouth, HVAC, pricing, MMS Vegas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
