<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-ems-lighthouse-project" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The EMS Lighthouse Project</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-ems-lighthouse-project</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street. Join Mike Verkest and Dr. Jeff Jarvis as they shine the bright light of science on EMS practice in an informative and fun way.</description>
    <copyright>2025 Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED, LLC.</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>e692f036-148c-59aa-929b-40fae355196c</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <link>http://www.flightbridgeed.com/</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Health &amp; Fitness">
      <itunes:category text="Medicine"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/l7WmFIcxDn7ooHMwAZwk1NfaWcSsDWlqtIUqAK6p7mo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQzNDgyLzE2OTAx/MjYwMTYtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street. Join Mike Verkest and Dr. Jeff Jarvis as they shine the bright light of science on EMS practice in an informative and fun way.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Evan Claunch</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>evan.claunch@flightbridgeed.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Ep110 - Smida Defends Resuscitation, Part II</title>
      <itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>110</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep110 - Smida Defends Resuscitation, Part II</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06c36e67-3b6e-48bb-a074-d8590dd543e2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9b8d1a26</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join Dr. Jeff Jarvis for part II of his interview with podcase friend and frequent contributor, now-Dr Tanner Smida where we discuss his defense of his PhD. Dr Smida discusses four papers that inform cardiac arrest resuscitation, as well as lessons he learned about conducting well-designed observational studies. </p><p>Although his dissertation was built around only 4 papers, here is Dr Smida’s entire bibliography:</p><p>1.        Smida T, Willson C, Salerno J, Weiss L, Salcido DD. Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches. Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. </p><p>2.        Patterson PD, Weiss LS, Weaver MD, Salcido DD, Opitz SE, Okerman TS, Smida TT, Martin SE, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW. Napping on the night shift and its impact on blood pressure and heart rate variability among emergency medical services workers: study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):212. </p><p>3.        Smida T, Koller AC, Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD. Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study. Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 28;6:100125. </p><p>4.        Smida T, Salerno J, Weiss L, Martin-Gill C, Salcido DD. PulsePoint dispatch associated patient characteristics and prehospital outcomes in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:36-43. </p><p>5.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Weiss LS, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital hypotension depth and dose with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep 30;180:99-107. </p><p>6.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Bardes J, Scheidler JF, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital post-resuscitation peripheral oxygen saturation with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:28-36. </p><p>7.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 13:1-7. </p><p>8.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J; CARES Surveillance Group. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: A study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 28:109812. </p><p>9.        Smida T, Price BS, Scheidler J, Crowe R, Wilson A, Bardes J. Stay and play or load and go? The association of on-scene advanced life support interventions with return of spontaneous circulation following traumatic cardiac arrest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 May 10. </p><p>10.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido D, Martin PS, Scheidler J, James Bardes. The Association of Combined Prehospital Hypotension and Hypoxia With Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jul 26:1-9. </p><p>11.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B. The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Sep 26:1-7. </p><p>12.  Smida T, Bonasso P, Bardes J, Price BS, Seifarth F, Gurien L, Maxson R, Letton R. Reverse shock index multiplied by the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale predicts mortality and need for intervention in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 26. </p><p>13.  Suchko S, Smida T, Crowe RP, Menegazzi JJ, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes JM, Salcido DD. The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset. Resuscitation. 2024 Mar;196:110135. </p><p>14.  Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M. A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 28:1-23. </p><p>15.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Martin PS, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Price BS, Bardes JM. A retrospective, multi-agency ‘target trial emulation’ for the comparison of post-resuscitation epinephrine to norepinephrine.  Resuscitation.  2024 April</p><p>16.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Merrill PW, Scheidler JF. A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data. Air Med J. 2024 May-Jun;43(3):259-261. </p><p>17.  Niemann B, Zarfoss E, Victory J, Smida T, Petros K, Sestito M, Bardes J. Evaluation of Oral Vasoactive Medications to Maintain Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury. J Surg Res. 2024 Aug 12;302:339-346. </p><p>18.  Smida T, Price BS, Mizener A, Crowe RP, Bardes JM. Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 15:1-8. </p><p>19.  Smida T, Voges L, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Prehospital Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing in the United States: Treatment Epidemiology, Predictors of Treatment Failure, and Associated Outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Sep 4:1-8. </p><p>20.  Smida T, Dayal S, Bardes J, Scheidler J. Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 18:1-9. </p><p>21.  Smida T, Cheskes S, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes J. The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110507. </p><p>22.  Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110515. </p><p>23.  Nordstrom NK, Smida T, Bardes JM, Brown C, Wilson A. A contemporary analysis of prehospital crystalloid resuscitation after trauma. Injury. 2025 Jul 15:112614.</p><p>24.  Kimbrell JM, Kreinbrook JA, Stebel J, Smida T, Shekhar AC, Rodriguez D, Mara A, Mullen J, Miele A, Vega J. Delays to chest compressions and defibrillation after prehospital rearrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Dec;98:118-123. </p><p>25.  Smida T, Kimbrell JM, Kreinbrook JA, Gan GH, Odom W, Bouthillet T, Walsh B, Shukis M, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Moskowitz A, Counts CR, Bardes J. The prevalence of sustained electrical capture during prehospital transcutaneous pacing: a multicenter observational study. Resuscitation. 2025 Dec 22:110934. </p><p>26.  Smida T, Harvey W, Bonasso P, Price BS, Martin PS, Bardes J. The ability of statewide prehospital pediatric blood transfusion protocols to predict early in-hospital blood product administration: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2026 Jan 20. </p><p>27.  Smida T, Handyside R, Crowe R, McDonald A, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Factors associated with successful intravenous access in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2026 Feb 25:1-12.</p><p>28.  Smida T, Handyside R, Crowe R, Merrill PW, Scheidler J, Bardes J. A retrospective comparison of plunger-type and band-type mechanical chest compression devices for prehospital resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2026 Feb 25:1-12. </p><p>29.  Kreinbrook JA, Kimbrell JM, Gan GH, Odom W, Shukis M, Bardes J, Smida ...</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join Dr. Jeff Jarvis for part II of his interview with podcase friend and frequent contributor, now-Dr Tanner Smida where we discuss his defense of his PhD. Dr Smida discusses four papers that inform cardiac arrest resuscitation, as well as lessons he learned about conducting well-designed observational studies. </p><p>Although his dissertation was built around only 4 papers, here is Dr Smida’s entire bibliography:</p><p>1.        Smida T, Willson C, Salerno J, Weiss L, Salcido DD. Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches. Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. </p><p>2.        Patterson PD, Weiss LS, Weaver MD, Salcido DD, Opitz SE, Okerman TS, Smida TT, Martin SE, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW. Napping on the night shift and its impact on blood pressure and heart rate variability among emergency medical services workers: study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):212. </p><p>3.        Smida T, Koller AC, Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD. Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study. Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 28;6:100125. </p><p>4.        Smida T, Salerno J, Weiss L, Martin-Gill C, Salcido DD. PulsePoint dispatch associated patient characteristics and prehospital outcomes in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:36-43. </p><p>5.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Weiss LS, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital hypotension depth and dose with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep 30;180:99-107. </p><p>6.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Bardes J, Scheidler JF, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital post-resuscitation peripheral oxygen saturation with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:28-36. </p><p>7.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 13:1-7. </p><p>8.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J; CARES Surveillance Group. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: A study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 28:109812. </p><p>9.        Smida T, Price BS, Scheidler J, Crowe R, Wilson A, Bardes J. Stay and play or load and go? The association of on-scene advanced life support interventions with return of spontaneous circulation following traumatic cardiac arrest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 May 10. </p><p>10.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido D, Martin PS, Scheidler J, James Bardes. The Association of Combined Prehospital Hypotension and Hypoxia With Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jul 26:1-9. </p><p>11.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B. The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Sep 26:1-7. </p><p>12.  Smida T, Bonasso P, Bardes J, Price BS, Seifarth F, Gurien L, Maxson R, Letton R. Reverse shock index multiplied by the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale predicts mortality and need for intervention in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 26. </p><p>13.  Suchko S, Smida T, Crowe RP, Menegazzi JJ, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes JM, Salcido DD. The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset. Resuscitation. 2024 Mar;196:110135. </p><p>14.  Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M. A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 28:1-23. </p><p>15.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Martin PS, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Price BS, Bardes JM. A retrospective, multi-agency ‘target trial emulation’ for the comparison of post-resuscitation epinephrine to norepinephrine.  Resuscitation.  2024 April</p><p>16.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Merrill PW, Scheidler JF. A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data. Air Med J. 2024 May-Jun;43(3):259-261. </p><p>17.  Niemann B, Zarfoss E, Victory J, Smida T, Petros K, Sestito M, Bardes J. Evaluation of Oral Vasoactive Medications to Maintain Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury. J Surg Res. 2024 Aug 12;302:339-346. </p><p>18.  Smida T, Price BS, Mizener A, Crowe RP, Bardes JM. Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 15:1-8. </p><p>19.  Smida T, Voges L, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Prehospital Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing in the United States: Treatment Epidemiology, Predictors of Treatment Failure, and Associated Outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Sep 4:1-8. </p><p>20.  Smida T, Dayal S, Bardes J, Scheidler J. Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 18:1-9. </p><p>21.  Smida T, Cheskes S, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes J. The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110507. </p><p>22.  Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110515. </p><p>23.  Nordstrom NK, Smida T, Bardes JM, Brown C, Wilson A. A contemporary analysis of prehospital crystalloid resuscitation after trauma. Injury. 2025 Jul 15:112614.</p><p>24.  Kimbrell JM, Kreinbrook JA, Stebel J, Smida T, Shekhar AC, Rodriguez D, Mara A, Mullen J, Miele A, Vega J. Delays to chest compressions and defibrillation after prehospital rearrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Dec;98:118-123. </p><p>25.  Smida T, Kimbrell JM, Kreinbrook JA, Gan GH, Odom W, Bouthillet T, Walsh B, Shukis M, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Moskowitz A, Counts CR, Bardes J. The prevalence of sustained electrical capture during prehospital transcutaneous pacing: a multicenter observational study. Resuscitation. 2025 Dec 22:110934. </p><p>26.  Smida T, Harvey W, Bonasso P, Price BS, Martin PS, Bardes J. The ability of statewide prehospital pediatric blood transfusion protocols to predict early in-hospital blood product administration: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2026 Jan 20. </p><p>27.  Smida T, Handyside R, Crowe R, McDonald A, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Factors associated with successful intravenous access in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2026 Feb 25:1-12.</p><p>28.  Smida T, Handyside R, Crowe R, Merrill PW, Scheidler J, Bardes J. A retrospective comparison of plunger-type and band-type mechanical chest compression devices for prehospital resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2026 Feb 25:1-12. </p><p>29.  Kreinbrook JA, Kimbrell JM, Gan GH, Odom W, Shukis M, Bardes J, Smida ...</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/9b8d1a26/29c55af4.mp3" length="100404919" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/gBWCcV9L4YfchWC4NjeJox8YY_4ijSAtKJ6be-wodRk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81NmFj/YTI2NWNiZTQxYTBk/ZjNiNjNlMDQ0NWY4/Yjc1ZC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3063</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join Dr. Jeff Jarvis for part II of his interview with podcase friend and frequent contributor, now-Dr Tanner Smida where we discuss his defense of his PhD. Dr Smida discusses four papers that inform cardiac arrest resuscitation, as well as lessons he learned about conducting well-designed observational studies. </p><p>Although his dissertation was built around only 4 papers, here is Dr Smida’s entire bibliography:</p><p>1.        Smida T, Willson C, Salerno J, Weiss L, Salcido DD. Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches. Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. </p><p>2.        Patterson PD, Weiss LS, Weaver MD, Salcido DD, Opitz SE, Okerman TS, Smida TT, Martin SE, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW. Napping on the night shift and its impact on blood pressure and heart rate variability among emergency medical services workers: study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):212. </p><p>3.        Smida T, Koller AC, Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD. Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study. Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 28;6:100125. </p><p>4.        Smida T, Salerno J, Weiss L, Martin-Gill C, Salcido DD. PulsePoint dispatch associated patient characteristics and prehospital outcomes in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:36-43. </p><p>5.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Weiss LS, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital hypotension depth and dose with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep 30;180:99-107. </p><p>6.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Bardes J, Scheidler JF, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital post-resuscitation peripheral oxygen saturation with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:28-36. </p><p>7.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 13:1-7. </p><p>8.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J; CARES Surveillance Group. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: A study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 28:109812. </p><p>9.        Smida T, Price BS, Scheidler J, Crowe R, Wilson A, Bardes J. Stay and play or load and go? The association of on-scene advanced life support interventions with return of spontaneous circulation following traumatic cardiac arrest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 May 10. </p><p>10.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido D, Martin PS, Scheidler J, James Bardes. The Association of Combined Prehospital Hypotension and Hypoxia With Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jul 26:1-9. </p><p>11.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B. The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Sep 26:1-7. </p><p>12.  Smida T, Bonasso P, Bardes J, Price BS, Seifarth F, Gurien L, Maxson R, Letton R. Reverse shock index multiplied by the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale predicts mortality and need for intervention in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 26. </p><p>13.  Suchko S, Smida T, Crowe RP, Menegazzi JJ, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes JM, Salcido DD. The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset. Resuscitation. 2024 Mar;196:110135. </p><p>14.  Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M. A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 28:1-23. </p><p>15.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Martin PS, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Price BS, Bardes JM. A retrospective, multi-agency ‘target trial emulation’ for the comparison of post-resuscitation epinephrine to norepinephrine.  Resuscitation.  2024 April</p><p>16.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Merrill PW, Scheidler JF. A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data. Air Med J. 2024 May-Jun;43(3):259-261. </p><p>17.  Niemann B, Zarfoss E, Victory J, Smida T, Petros K, Sestito M, Bardes J. Evaluation of Oral Vasoactive Medications to Maintain Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury. J Surg Res. 2024 Aug 12;302:339-346. </p><p>18.  Smida T, Price BS, Mizener A, Crowe RP, Bardes JM. Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 15:1-8. </p><p>19.  Smida T, Voges L, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Prehospital Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing in the United States: Treatment Epidemiology, Predictors of Treatment Failure, and Associated Outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Sep 4:1-8. </p><p>20.  Smida T, Dayal S, Bardes J, Scheidler J. Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 18:1-9. </p><p>21.  Smida T, Cheskes S, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes J. The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110507. </p><p>22.  Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110515. </p><p>23.  Nordstrom NK, Smida T, Bardes JM, Brown C, Wilson A. A contemporary analysis of prehospital crystalloid resuscitation after trauma. Injury. 2025 Jul 15:112614.</p><p>24.  Kimbrell JM, Kreinbrook JA, Stebel J, Smida T, Shekhar AC, Rodriguez D, Mara A, Mullen J, Miele A, Vega J. Delays to chest compressions and defibrillation after prehospital rearrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Dec;98:118-123. </p><p>25.  Smida T, Kimbrell JM, Kreinbrook JA, Gan GH, Odom W, Bouthillet T, Walsh B, Shukis M, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Moskowitz A, Counts CR, Bardes J. The prevalence of sustained electrical capture during prehospital transcutaneous pacing: a multicenter observational study. Resuscitation. 2025 Dec 22:110934. </p><p>26.  Smida T, Harvey W, Bonasso P, Price BS, Martin PS, Bardes J. The ability of statewide prehospital pediatric blood transfusion protocols to predict early in-hospital blood product administration: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2026 Jan 20. </p><p>27.  Smida T, Handyside R, Crowe R, McDonald A, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Factors associated with successful intravenous access in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2026 Feb 25:1-12.</p><p>28.  Smida T, Handyside R, Crowe R, Merrill PW, Scheidler J, Bardes J. A retrospective comparison of plunger-type and band-type mechanical chest compression devices for prehospital resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2026 Feb 25:1-12. </p><p>29.  Kreinbrook JA, Kimbrell JM, Gan GH, Odom W, Shukis M, Bardes J, Smida ...</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Evidence, Cardiac Arrest, Science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep109 - Smida Defends Resuscitation, Part I</title>
      <itunes:episode>109</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>109</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep109 - Smida Defends Resuscitation, Part I</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e1e57ed-4b01-4d39-9d70-179a16b74807</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/459b0f4f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join Dr. Jeff Jarvis as he interviews podcase friend and frequent contributor, now-Dr Tanner Smida for the first of a two-part interview where we discuss his defense of his PhD. Dr Smida discusses four papers that inform cardiac arrest resuscitation, as well as lessons he learned about conducting well-designed observational studies. </p><p>Although his dissertation was built around only 4 papers, here is Dr Smida’s entire bibliography:</p><p>1.        Smida T, Willson C, Salerno J, Weiss L, Salcido DD. Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches. Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 18. PMID: 31962177.</p><p>2.        Patterson PD, Weiss LS, Weaver MD, Salcido DD, Opitz SE, Okerman TS, Smida TT, Martin SE, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW. Napping on the night shift and its impact on blood pressure and heart rate variability among emergency medical services workers: study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05161-4. PMID: 33726840; PMCID: PMC7962082.</p><p>3.        Smida T, Koller AC, Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD. Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study. Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 28;6:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100125. PMID: 34223383; PMCID: PMC8244478.</p><p>4.        Smida T, Salerno J, Weiss L, Martin-Gill C, Salcido DD. PulsePoint dispatch associated patient characteristics and prehospital outcomes in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11. PMID: 34774964.</p><p>5.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Weiss LS, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital hypotension depth and dose with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep 30;180:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.09.018. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36191809.</p><p>6.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Bardes J, Scheidler JF, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital post-resuscitation peripheral oxygen saturation with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PMID: 36272616.</p><p>7.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 13:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2169422. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36652451.</p><p>8.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J; CARES Surveillance Group. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: A study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 28:109812. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109812. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37120129.</p><p>9.        Smida T, Price BS, Scheidler J, Crowe R, Wilson A, Bardes J. Stay and play or load and go? The association of on-scene advanced life support interventions with return of spontaneous circulation following traumatic cardiac arrest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02279-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37162554.</p><p>10.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido D, Martin PS, Scheidler J, James Bardes. The Association of Combined Prehospital Hypotension and Hypoxia With Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jul 26:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2238820. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37494278.</p><p>11.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B. The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Sep 26:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2262566. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37751228.</p><p>12.  Smida T, Bonasso P, Bardes J, Price BS, Seifarth F, Gurien L, Maxson R, Letton R. Reverse shock index multiplied by the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale predicts mortality and need for intervention in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004258. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38273438.</p><p>13.  Suchko S, Smida T, Crowe RP, Menegazzi JJ, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes JM, Salcido DD. The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset. Resuscitation. 2024 Mar;196:110135. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110135. Epub 2024 Feb 7. PMID: 38331343.</p><p>14.  Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M. A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 28:1-23. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2321285. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38416867.</p><p>15.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Martin PS, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Price BS, Bardes JM. A retrospective, multi-agency ‘target trial emulation’ for the comparison of post-resuscitation epinephrine to norepinephrine.  Resuscitation.  2024 April; doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110201. Epub ahead of print.</p><p>16.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Merrill PW, Scheidler JF. A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data. Air Med J. 2024 May-Jun;43(3):259-261. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Apr 5. PMID: 38821710.</p><p>17.  Niemann B, Zarfoss E, Victory J, Smida T, Petros K, Sestito M, Bardes J. Evaluation of Oral Vasoactive Medications to Maintain Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury. J Surg Res. 2024 Aug 12;302:339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.059. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39137515.</p><p>18.  Smida T, Price BS, Mizener A, Crowe RP, Bardes JM. Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 15:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39088816.</p><p>19.  Smida T, Voges L, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Prehospital Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing in the United States: Treatment Epidemiology, Predictors of Treatment Failure, and Associated Outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Sep 4:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2393768. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39150824.</p><p>20.  Smida T, Dayal S, Bardes J, Scheidler J. Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 18:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2408628. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39321386.</p><p>21.  Smida T, Cheskes S, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes J. The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110507. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110507. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39855423.</p><p>22.  Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110515. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110515. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39863130.</p><p>23.  Nordstrom NK, Smida T, Bardes JM, Brown C, Wilson A. A contemporary analysis of pr...</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join Dr. Jeff Jarvis as he interviews podcase friend and frequent contributor, now-Dr Tanner Smida for the first of a two-part interview where we discuss his defense of his PhD. Dr Smida discusses four papers that inform cardiac arrest resuscitation, as well as lessons he learned about conducting well-designed observational studies. </p><p>Although his dissertation was built around only 4 papers, here is Dr Smida’s entire bibliography:</p><p>1.        Smida T, Willson C, Salerno J, Weiss L, Salcido DD. Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches. Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 18. PMID: 31962177.</p><p>2.        Patterson PD, Weiss LS, Weaver MD, Salcido DD, Opitz SE, Okerman TS, Smida TT, Martin SE, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW. Napping on the night shift and its impact on blood pressure and heart rate variability among emergency medical services workers: study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05161-4. PMID: 33726840; PMCID: PMC7962082.</p><p>3.        Smida T, Koller AC, Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD. Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study. Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 28;6:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100125. PMID: 34223383; PMCID: PMC8244478.</p><p>4.        Smida T, Salerno J, Weiss L, Martin-Gill C, Salcido DD. PulsePoint dispatch associated patient characteristics and prehospital outcomes in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11. PMID: 34774964.</p><p>5.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Weiss LS, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital hypotension depth and dose with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep 30;180:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.09.018. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36191809.</p><p>6.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Bardes J, Scheidler JF, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital post-resuscitation peripheral oxygen saturation with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PMID: 36272616.</p><p>7.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 13:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2169422. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36652451.</p><p>8.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J; CARES Surveillance Group. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: A study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 28:109812. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109812. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37120129.</p><p>9.        Smida T, Price BS, Scheidler J, Crowe R, Wilson A, Bardes J. Stay and play or load and go? The association of on-scene advanced life support interventions with return of spontaneous circulation following traumatic cardiac arrest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02279-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37162554.</p><p>10.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido D, Martin PS, Scheidler J, James Bardes. The Association of Combined Prehospital Hypotension and Hypoxia With Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jul 26:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2238820. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37494278.</p><p>11.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B. The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Sep 26:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2262566. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37751228.</p><p>12.  Smida T, Bonasso P, Bardes J, Price BS, Seifarth F, Gurien L, Maxson R, Letton R. Reverse shock index multiplied by the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale predicts mortality and need for intervention in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004258. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38273438.</p><p>13.  Suchko S, Smida T, Crowe RP, Menegazzi JJ, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes JM, Salcido DD. The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset. Resuscitation. 2024 Mar;196:110135. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110135. Epub 2024 Feb 7. PMID: 38331343.</p><p>14.  Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M. A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 28:1-23. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2321285. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38416867.</p><p>15.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Martin PS, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Price BS, Bardes JM. A retrospective, multi-agency ‘target trial emulation’ for the comparison of post-resuscitation epinephrine to norepinephrine.  Resuscitation.  2024 April; doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110201. Epub ahead of print.</p><p>16.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Merrill PW, Scheidler JF. A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data. Air Med J. 2024 May-Jun;43(3):259-261. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Apr 5. PMID: 38821710.</p><p>17.  Niemann B, Zarfoss E, Victory J, Smida T, Petros K, Sestito M, Bardes J. Evaluation of Oral Vasoactive Medications to Maintain Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury. J Surg Res. 2024 Aug 12;302:339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.059. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39137515.</p><p>18.  Smida T, Price BS, Mizener A, Crowe RP, Bardes JM. Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 15:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39088816.</p><p>19.  Smida T, Voges L, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Prehospital Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing in the United States: Treatment Epidemiology, Predictors of Treatment Failure, and Associated Outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Sep 4:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2393768. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39150824.</p><p>20.  Smida T, Dayal S, Bardes J, Scheidler J. Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 18:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2408628. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39321386.</p><p>21.  Smida T, Cheskes S, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes J. The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110507. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110507. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39855423.</p><p>22.  Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110515. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110515. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39863130.</p><p>23.  Nordstrom NK, Smida T, Bardes JM, Brown C, Wilson A. A contemporary analysis of pr...</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 21:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/459b0f4f/dbc67b61.mp3" length="115070234" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/hFsu4d4PlmpBBWEw8QGuPxFrObsFxHmRKsq5T2SbLGI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hYjZl/MzJlZDEyZDU4ZjM1/YjBhMGZhMmNiNGVj/OWI4Ny5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3519</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join Dr. Jeff Jarvis as he interviews podcase friend and frequent contributor, now-Dr Tanner Smida for the first of a two-part interview where we discuss his defense of his PhD. Dr Smida discusses four papers that inform cardiac arrest resuscitation, as well as lessons he learned about conducting well-designed observational studies. </p><p>Although his dissertation was built around only 4 papers, here is Dr Smida’s entire bibliography:</p><p>1.        Smida T, Willson C, Salerno J, Weiss L, Salcido DD. Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches. Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 18. PMID: 31962177.</p><p>2.        Patterson PD, Weiss LS, Weaver MD, Salcido DD, Opitz SE, Okerman TS, Smida TT, Martin SE, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW. Napping on the night shift and its impact on blood pressure and heart rate variability among emergency medical services workers: study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05161-4. PMID: 33726840; PMCID: PMC7962082.</p><p>3.        Smida T, Koller AC, Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD. Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study. Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 28;6:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100125. PMID: 34223383; PMCID: PMC8244478.</p><p>4.        Smida T, Salerno J, Weiss L, Martin-Gill C, Salcido DD. PulsePoint dispatch associated patient characteristics and prehospital outcomes in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11. PMID: 34774964.</p><p>5.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Weiss LS, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital hypotension depth and dose with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep 30;180:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.09.018. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36191809.</p><p>6.        Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Bardes J, Scheidler JF, Salcido DD. Association of prehospital post-resuscitation peripheral oxygen saturation with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PMID: 36272616.</p><p>7.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 13:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2169422. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36652451.</p><p>8.        Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J; CARES Surveillance Group. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: A study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 28:109812. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109812. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37120129.</p><p>9.        Smida T, Price BS, Scheidler J, Crowe R, Wilson A, Bardes J. Stay and play or load and go? The association of on-scene advanced life support interventions with return of spontaneous circulation following traumatic cardiac arrest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02279-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37162554.</p><p>10.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido D, Martin PS, Scheidler J, James Bardes. The Association of Combined Prehospital Hypotension and Hypoxia With Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jul 26:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2238820. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37494278.</p><p>11.  Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B. The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Sep 26:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2262566. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37751228.</p><p>12.  Smida T, Bonasso P, Bardes J, Price BS, Seifarth F, Gurien L, Maxson R, Letton R. Reverse shock index multiplied by the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale predicts mortality and need for intervention in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004258. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38273438.</p><p>13.  Suchko S, Smida T, Crowe RP, Menegazzi JJ, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes JM, Salcido DD. The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset. Resuscitation. 2024 Mar;196:110135. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110135. Epub 2024 Feb 7. PMID: 38331343.</p><p>14.  Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M. A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 28:1-23. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2321285. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38416867.</p><p>15.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Martin PS, Scheidler JF, Shukis M, Price BS, Bardes JM. A retrospective, multi-agency ‘target trial emulation’ for the comparison of post-resuscitation epinephrine to norepinephrine.  Resuscitation.  2024 April; doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110201. Epub ahead of print.</p><p>16.  Smida T, Crowe RP, Merrill PW, Scheidler JF. A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data. Air Med J. 2024 May-Jun;43(3):259-261. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Apr 5. PMID: 38821710.</p><p>17.  Niemann B, Zarfoss E, Victory J, Smida T, Petros K, Sestito M, Bardes J. Evaluation of Oral Vasoactive Medications to Maintain Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury. J Surg Res. 2024 Aug 12;302:339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.059. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39137515.</p><p>18.  Smida T, Price BS, Mizener A, Crowe RP, Bardes JM. Prehospital Post-Resuscitation Vital Sign Phenotypes are Associated with Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Aug 15:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39088816.</p><p>19.  Smida T, Voges L, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Bardes J. Prehospital Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing in the United States: Treatment Epidemiology, Predictors of Treatment Failure, and Associated Outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Sep 4:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2393768. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39150824.</p><p>20.  Smida T, Dayal S, Bardes J, Scheidler J. Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 18:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2408628. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39321386.</p><p>21.  Smida T, Cheskes S, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Shukis M, Martin PS, Bardes J. The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110507. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110507. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39855423.</p><p>22.  Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025 Jan 23:110515. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110515. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39863130.</p><p>23.  Nordstrom NK, Smida T, Bardes JM, Brown C, Wilson A. A contemporary analysis of pr...</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Literature, Science, Cardiac Arrest, Evidence</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep108 - 3 Pods In 1</title>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>108</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep108 - 3 Pods In 1</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b664f088-11e8-4eb1-b002-330dfcba6927</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/87a27e23</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a special version of the EMS Lighthouse, live from Ashland, OR. We are joined by Mike Verkest and Dr Ritu Sahni from The EMS Show, and Jimmy Apple from The EMS Avenger at the State of Jefferson Conference in Southern Oregon. We had a blast and covered a to of ground. I hope y'all enjoy!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a special version of the EMS Lighthouse, live from Ashland, OR. We are joined by Mike Verkest and Dr Ritu Sahni from The EMS Show, and Jimmy Apple from The EMS Avenger at the State of Jefferson Conference in Southern Oregon. We had a blast and covered a to of ground. I hope y'all enjoy!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/87a27e23/4414abe4.mp3" length="100515147" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/L14s4eYaoI5FFhVndmnN6UPPj-ypJBOCMPBdZykWA_A/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83MGEw/YmI5ODZiZmE5NmFi/MjgzMmIwMTZmNzQ4/MDI5ZC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3068</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a special version of the EMS Lighthouse, live from Ashland, OR. We are joined by Mike Verkest and Dr Ritu Sahni from The EMS Show, and Jimmy Apple from The EMS Avenger at the State of Jefferson Conference in Southern Oregon. We had a blast and covered a to of ground. I hope y'all enjoy!</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, EMS Show, EMS Avenger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep107 - 3 Papers With Dr Crowe</title>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>107</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep107 - 3 Papers With Dr Crowe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64ca1c21-b556-4486-85dd-2fc5e1d0f5ab</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9ab7f957</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr Remle Crowe returns to the podcast to discuss three new papers with Dr Jarvis: Two papers on epinephrine in cardiact arrest (including one on trauma!) and one on pulse oximetry in hypoxemic patients with darker skin. We might nerd out a bit on methodology, tacos, and have a few book recommendations.</p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><ol><li> Martin DS, Doidge JC, Gould D, et al.: The impact of skin tone on performance of pulse oximeters used by NHS England COVID Oximetry @home scheme: measurement and diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2026;January 14;392</li><li>Witt CE, Shatz DV, Robinson BRH, et al.: Epinephrine in Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest—Life Saving or False Hope? Prehospital Emergency Care. 2026;January 2;30(1):153–61.</li><li>Lilien EJ, Ashburn NP, George TS, et al.: Single Dose Epinephrine Protocol Is Associated With Improved Survival of Older Adults With Out‐Of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025</li><li>Perez CP: Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York, NY, Abrams Press, 2019.</li><li>O’Neil C: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY, Crown Publishing Group, 2017.</li></ol><p>	•		6.	Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al.: A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;August 23;379(8):711–21.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr Remle Crowe returns to the podcast to discuss three new papers with Dr Jarvis: Two papers on epinephrine in cardiact arrest (including one on trauma!) and one on pulse oximetry in hypoxemic patients with darker skin. We might nerd out a bit on methodology, tacos, and have a few book recommendations.</p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><ol><li> Martin DS, Doidge JC, Gould D, et al.: The impact of skin tone on performance of pulse oximeters used by NHS England COVID Oximetry @home scheme: measurement and diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2026;January 14;392</li><li>Witt CE, Shatz DV, Robinson BRH, et al.: Epinephrine in Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest—Life Saving or False Hope? Prehospital Emergency Care. 2026;January 2;30(1):153–61.</li><li>Lilien EJ, Ashburn NP, George TS, et al.: Single Dose Epinephrine Protocol Is Associated With Improved Survival of Older Adults With Out‐Of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025</li><li>Perez CP: Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York, NY, Abrams Press, 2019.</li><li>O’Neil C: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY, Crown Publishing Group, 2017.</li></ol><p>	•		6.	Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al.: A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;August 23;379(8):711–21.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 03:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/9ab7f957/3b7af006.mp3" length="112289091" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/ltQjBwZGxq67rAGrQcc4J5SQL00gxGqN2EOJU4Kj7tg/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81ODQw/MTQ1N2JlOGU0MjQ5/YThlOWFhNmFjY2Vm/YjkxYi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3425</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr Remle Crowe returns to the podcast to discuss three new papers with Dr Jarvis: Two papers on epinephrine in cardiact arrest (including one on trauma!) and one on pulse oximetry in hypoxemic patients with darker skin. We might nerd out a bit on methodology, tacos, and have a few book recommendations.</p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><ol><li> Martin DS, Doidge JC, Gould D, et al.: The impact of skin tone on performance of pulse oximeters used by NHS England COVID Oximetry @home scheme: measurement and diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2026;January 14;392</li><li>Witt CE, Shatz DV, Robinson BRH, et al.: Epinephrine in Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest—Life Saving or False Hope? Prehospital Emergency Care. 2026;January 2;30(1):153–61.</li><li>Lilien EJ, Ashburn NP, George TS, et al.: Single Dose Epinephrine Protocol Is Associated With Improved Survival of Older Adults With Out‐Of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025</li><li>Perez CP: Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York, NY, Abrams Press, 2019.</li><li>O’Neil C: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY, Crown Publishing Group, 2017.</li></ol><p>	•		6.	Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al.: A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;August 23;379(8):711–21.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, Epinephrine, Cardiac Arrest, Pulse Oximetry, Racial Disparities</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 106 - Succ vs Roc in Hyperkalemia</title>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>106</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 106 - Succ vs Roc in Hyperkalemia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cb62f473-4ab8-409f-89e6-041574b178ca</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7e194c4b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were all taught succinylcholine is contraindicated in hyperkalemia because it can cause potassium release, exacerbating the problem. But does it? Does it really?</p><p>Dr. Jarvis discusses a recent paper that seems to compare mortality within 24 hours of RSI in hyperkalemic patients between those intubated with succ or rocuronium. And then we discuss methods.. including the Table 1 Fallacy. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Simmer PE, Perza M, Cho YD, et al.: Hyperkalemic emergency department patients intubated with rocuronium or succinylcholine: Retrospective study of clinical outcomes. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; February;100:154–64.</p><p>2.     Cole JB, Knack SKS, Driver BE: The value of P-values in “Table 1.” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; February;100:182–6.</p><p>3.     Pappal RD, Roberts BW, Mohr NM, et al.: The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(5):532–44.</p><p>4.     ‘Rick &amp; Jerry’ Pass the Baton | Emergency Physicians Monthly. Available at <a href="https://epmonthly.com/article/rick-jerry-pass-the-baton/">https://epmonthly.com/article/rick-jerry-pass-the-baton/</a>. Accessed January 25, 2026.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were all taught succinylcholine is contraindicated in hyperkalemia because it can cause potassium release, exacerbating the problem. But does it? Does it really?</p><p>Dr. Jarvis discusses a recent paper that seems to compare mortality within 24 hours of RSI in hyperkalemic patients between those intubated with succ or rocuronium. And then we discuss methods.. including the Table 1 Fallacy. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Simmer PE, Perza M, Cho YD, et al.: Hyperkalemic emergency department patients intubated with rocuronium or succinylcholine: Retrospective study of clinical outcomes. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; February;100:154–64.</p><p>2.     Cole JB, Knack SKS, Driver BE: The value of P-values in “Table 1.” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; February;100:182–6.</p><p>3.     Pappal RD, Roberts BW, Mohr NM, et al.: The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(5):532–44.</p><p>4.     ‘Rick &amp; Jerry’ Pass the Baton | Emergency Physicians Monthly. Available at <a href="https://epmonthly.com/article/rick-jerry-pass-the-baton/">https://epmonthly.com/article/rick-jerry-pass-the-baton/</a>. Accessed January 25, 2026.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 01:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/7e194c4b/dd74c7cf.mp3" length="59636943" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/IoJwCUnQQ7GA03Ry0oPpOTeN9ACK8ThHSygKjp2-sh8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lMTUw/MGZlNjY2OTAyZmYz/ZTBiMmIwMmFkMTY3/YWNlNi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1802</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were all taught succinylcholine is contraindicated in hyperkalemia because it can cause potassium release, exacerbating the problem. But does it? Does it really?</p><p>Dr. Jarvis discusses a recent paper that seems to compare mortality within 24 hours of RSI in hyperkalemic patients between those intubated with succ or rocuronium. And then we discuss methods.. including the Table 1 Fallacy. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Simmer PE, Perza M, Cho YD, et al.: Hyperkalemic emergency department patients intubated with rocuronium or succinylcholine: Retrospective study of clinical outcomes. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; February;100:154–64.</p><p>2.     Cole JB, Knack SKS, Driver BE: The value of P-values in “Table 1.” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; February;100:182–6.</p><p>3.     Pappal RD, Roberts BW, Mohr NM, et al.: The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(5):532–44.</p><p>4.     ‘Rick &amp; Jerry’ Pass the Baton | Emergency Physicians Monthly. Available at <a href="https://epmonthly.com/article/rick-jerry-pass-the-baton/">https://epmonthly.com/article/rick-jerry-pass-the-baton/</a>. Accessed January 25, 2026.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, RSI, Intubation, Succinylcholine, Rocuronium, Hyperkalemia, Evidence Based Medicine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 105 - The RSI Trial</title>
      <itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>105</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 105 - The RSI Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bdf092df-40f8-4e26-ba42-fe04177e133e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5586c474</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>You've read about how this groundbreaking trial on ketamine vs etomidate for RSI "Changes Everything!" on the socials. Or perhaps "it's horribly biased and unnecessary... we're already knew all this!". </p><p>Why? Well.. social media. Listen in as Dr Jarvis discusses not just this trial, but what the evidence landscape was before it was released. Why was it done, how was it done, what does it show, and how can we integrate it into our practice?</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Casey JD, Seitz KP, Driver BE, et al. Ketamine or Etomidate for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. Published online December 9, 2025.<br>2. Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9686):293-300. <br>3. Matchett G, Gasanova I, Riccio CA, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(1):78-91. <br>4. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, et al. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):48. <br>5. Yeh RW, Valsdottir LR, Yeh MW, et al. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k5094. doi:10.1136/bmj.k5094</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>You've read about how this groundbreaking trial on ketamine vs etomidate for RSI "Changes Everything!" on the socials. Or perhaps "it's horribly biased and unnecessary... we're already knew all this!". </p><p>Why? Well.. social media. Listen in as Dr Jarvis discusses not just this trial, but what the evidence landscape was before it was released. Why was it done, how was it done, what does it show, and how can we integrate it into our practice?</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Casey JD, Seitz KP, Driver BE, et al. Ketamine or Etomidate for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. Published online December 9, 2025.<br>2. Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9686):293-300. <br>3. Matchett G, Gasanova I, Riccio CA, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(1):78-91. <br>4. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, et al. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):48. <br>5. Yeh RW, Valsdottir LR, Yeh MW, et al. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k5094. doi:10.1136/bmj.k5094</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2025 19:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeff Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/5586c474/2d904e04.mp3" length="79296696" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeff Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/oFVXsUehrY5pwvV5RWKLw_TOgFNnEK7-6Kfm3Ohejh0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jNzk4/YTkzYWRiMGRiYjFh/NGYxYTFlZTcxMTA4/YmI3OS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2412</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>You've read about how this groundbreaking trial on ketamine vs etomidate for RSI "Changes Everything!" on the socials. Or perhaps "it's horribly biased and unnecessary... we're already knew all this!". </p><p>Why? Well.. social media. Listen in as Dr Jarvis discusses not just this trial, but what the evidence landscape was before it was released. Why was it done, how was it done, what does it show, and how can we integrate it into our practice?</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Casey JD, Seitz KP, Driver BE, et al. Ketamine or Etomidate for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. Published online December 9, 2025.<br>2. Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9686):293-300. <br>3. Matchett G, Gasanova I, Riccio CA, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(1):78-91. <br>4. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, et al. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):48. <br>5. Yeh RW, Valsdottir LR, Yeh MW, et al. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k5094. doi:10.1136/bmj.k5094</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Ketamine, Etomidate, RSI, Intubation, Science, Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Evidence Based Practice</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 104 - The IV vs IO Trials</title>
      <itunes:episode>104</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>104</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 104 - The IV vs IO Trials</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89df6952-5891-42a2-a385-7a5cbc9dd64d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7dde993b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Right on the heels of the release of the 2025 AHA guidelines, including one on preferentially using IVs over IOs, comes two RCTs in the same edition of NEJM that compare intial attempts with IVs to IOs in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Dr Jarvis discusses these two papers while answer a listeners question, and tries to put this, and early epinephrine, into context. And he might throw in some commentary about the AHA's recommendations on mCPR and Heads Up CPR.</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Couper K, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al. A Randomized Trial of Drug Route in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):336-348. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2407780<br>2. Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, et al. Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):349-360. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2407616<br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Right on the heels of the release of the 2025 AHA guidelines, including one on preferentially using IVs over IOs, comes two RCTs in the same edition of NEJM that compare intial attempts with IVs to IOs in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Dr Jarvis discusses these two papers while answer a listeners question, and tries to put this, and early epinephrine, into context. And he might throw in some commentary about the AHA's recommendations on mCPR and Heads Up CPR.</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Couper K, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al. A Randomized Trial of Drug Route in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):336-348. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2407780<br>2. Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, et al. Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):349-360. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2407616<br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMTP</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/7dde993b/bbbb1ee9.mp3" length="52382955" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMTP</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/QiVTIP843vKBoQnlDysY_-lYL2O-lWI9QyQFH52agBE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hYzM3/MjVmZjNmYmRhZjEw/ODE0YmNkODI1YWQ5/OTA2MC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1589</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Right on the heels of the release of the 2025 AHA guidelines, including one on preferentially using IVs over IOs, comes two RCTs in the same edition of NEJM that compare intial attempts with IVs to IOs in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Dr Jarvis discusses these two papers while answer a listeners question, and tries to put this, and early epinephrine, into context. And he might throw in some commentary about the AHA's recommendations on mCPR and Heads Up CPR.</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Couper K, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al. A Randomized Trial of Drug Route in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):336-348. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2407780<br>2. Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, et al. Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):349-360. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2407616<br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Medicine, Evidence Based Medicine, Science, Cardiac Arrest, IV, IO</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 103 - Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, and Postpartum Hemorrhage</title>
      <itunes:episode>103</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>103</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 103 - Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, and Postpartum Hemorrhage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">efc5bb2f-b0d6-4eca-9d95-bbb98a46988b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/82055e8e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>ACOG, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, recently published EMS guidelines for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage. Drs. Jenna White and Christopher Zahn join Dr Jarvis to discuss the science behind these recommendations as well as how to implement them into our practice. </p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. https://www.acog.org/programs/obstetric-emergencies-in-nonobstetric-settings</p><p>2. Vuncannon, D. M.; Platner, M. H.; Boulet, S. L. Timely Treatment of Severe Hypertension and Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity at an Urban Hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology MFM 2023, 5 (2), 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100809.</p><p>3. Gupta, M.; Greene, N.; Kilpatrick, S. J. Timely Treatment of Severe Maternal Hypertension and Reduction in Severe Maternal Morbidity. Pregnancy Hypertension 2018, 14, 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.07.010.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>ACOG, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, recently published EMS guidelines for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage. Drs. Jenna White and Christopher Zahn join Dr Jarvis to discuss the science behind these recommendations as well as how to implement them into our practice. </p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. https://www.acog.org/programs/obstetric-emergencies-in-nonobstetric-settings</p><p>2. Vuncannon, D. M.; Platner, M. H.; Boulet, S. L. Timely Treatment of Severe Hypertension and Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity at an Urban Hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology MFM 2023, 5 (2), 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100809.</p><p>3. Gupta, M.; Greene, N.; Kilpatrick, S. J. Timely Treatment of Severe Maternal Hypertension and Reduction in Severe Maternal Morbidity. Pregnancy Hypertension 2018, 14, 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.07.010.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 02:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L Jarvis, MD, MS, EMTP</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/82055e8e/e9c888b0.mp3" length="42304767" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L Jarvis, MD, MS, EMTP</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/4lDBmBsz_AFx7-wogoPgIGzqlxBp__DF-o3S9BnJwH0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8zYjFj/MzIyM2Q5MTViYjFj/NzI2OWQzNDg3MjFj/NjllNi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2988</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>ACOG, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, recently published EMS guidelines for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage. Drs. Jenna White and Christopher Zahn join Dr Jarvis to discuss the science behind these recommendations as well as how to implement them into our practice. </p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. https://www.acog.org/programs/obstetric-emergencies-in-nonobstetric-settings</p><p>2. Vuncannon, D. M.; Platner, M. H.; Boulet, S. L. Timely Treatment of Severe Hypertension and Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity at an Urban Hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology MFM 2023, 5 (2), 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100809.</p><p>3. Gupta, M.; Greene, N.; Kilpatrick, S. J. Timely Treatment of Severe Maternal Hypertension and Reduction in Severe Maternal Morbidity. Pregnancy Hypertension 2018, 14, 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.07.010.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Pregnancy, Hypertension, Hemorrhage, Seizure, Eclampsia</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 102 - Ketamine for Agitation with Dr Crowe</title>
      <itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>102</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 102 - Ketamine for Agitation with Dr Crowe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06c83300-f7d8-4dd1-9dc7-623f9ddddb22</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e4fe35cc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>You use ketamine. I use ketamine. We all use ketamine. But… how safe it is, really? A new study out of Toronto suggests 30% of patients who receive ketamine have adverse events, a rate higher than seen in the ED. What are we to make of this? I bring Dr Remle Crowe on to discuss…</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Kwong JL, Verbeek PR, Leong YC, Turner L, Huiskamp M, Drennan IR, Francom S, Ropp S, Cheskes S: Paramedic use of ketamine for severe agitation and violence. Can J Emerg Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00963-w">10.1007/s43678-025-00963-w</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>2.     Fernandez AR, Bourn SS, Crowe RP, Bronsky ES, Scheppke KA, Antevy P, Myers JB: Out-of-Hospital Ketamine: Indications for Use, Patient Outcomes, and Associated Mortality. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021;78(1):123–31.</p><p>3.     Brown LH, Crowe RP, Pepe PE, Miller ML, Watanabe BL, Kordik SS, Wampler DA, Page DI, Fernandez AR, Bourn SS, et al.: Adverse events following emergent prehospital sedation of patients with behavioral emergencies: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas. 2022;May;9:100183.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>You use ketamine. I use ketamine. We all use ketamine. But… how safe it is, really? A new study out of Toronto suggests 30% of patients who receive ketamine have adverse events, a rate higher than seen in the ED. What are we to make of this? I bring Dr Remle Crowe on to discuss…</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Kwong JL, Verbeek PR, Leong YC, Turner L, Huiskamp M, Drennan IR, Francom S, Ropp S, Cheskes S: Paramedic use of ketamine for severe agitation and violence. Can J Emerg Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00963-w">10.1007/s43678-025-00963-w</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>2.     Fernandez AR, Bourn SS, Crowe RP, Bronsky ES, Scheppke KA, Antevy P, Myers JB: Out-of-Hospital Ketamine: Indications for Use, Patient Outcomes, and Associated Mortality. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021;78(1):123–31.</p><p>3.     Brown LH, Crowe RP, Pepe PE, Miller ML, Watanabe BL, Kordik SS, Wampler DA, Page DI, Fernandez AR, Bourn SS, et al.: Adverse events following emergent prehospital sedation of patients with behavioral emergencies: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas. 2022;May;9:100183.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 21:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/e4fe35cc/07977565.mp3" length="79568897" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Cca8yIIbPj_YfTkSa12rQgF8YuzF69lxTucRFrz3z7A/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lZmI3/NzEwYzg1ODQzOGQw/MzFiOTAxZTFmYTc1/MjEzNC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2410</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>You use ketamine. I use ketamine. We all use ketamine. But… how safe it is, really? A new study out of Toronto suggests 30% of patients who receive ketamine have adverse events, a rate higher than seen in the ED. What are we to make of this? I bring Dr Remle Crowe on to discuss…</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Kwong JL, Verbeek PR, Leong YC, Turner L, Huiskamp M, Drennan IR, Francom S, Ropp S, Cheskes S: Paramedic use of ketamine for severe agitation and violence. Can J Emerg Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00963-w">10.1007/s43678-025-00963-w</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>2.     Fernandez AR, Bourn SS, Crowe RP, Bronsky ES, Scheppke KA, Antevy P, Myers JB: Out-of-Hospital Ketamine: Indications for Use, Patient Outcomes, and Associated Mortality. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021;78(1):123–31.</p><p>3.     Brown LH, Crowe RP, Pepe PE, Miller ML, Watanabe BL, Kordik SS, Wampler DA, Page DI, Fernandez AR, Bourn SS, et al.: Adverse events following emergent prehospital sedation of patients with behavioral emergencies: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas. 2022;May;9:100183.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Evidence, Ketamine, Agitation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 101 - PreOxygenation and Why Words Matter</title>
      <itunes:episode>101</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>101</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 101 - PreOxygenation and Why Words Matter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d8e5df84-a3ac-41fc-a854-437935c9150e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ef61ead</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We've covered pre-oxygenation strategies and intubation alot on this podcast, mayber more than anyting else. We covered the definition of FPS in E74, the DEVICE trial on DL vs VL in E75, and the PREOXI trial of NIV vs Mask Pre-oxygenation in E86. Now we have another Preoxygenation paper, this one that reports no difference between preoxygenation with BVM and face mask. WTAF? Better listen, because it turns out words matter, definitions are... definitional, and we absolutely MUST read more than just the abstract.  </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Gottlieb M, Alexander R, Love AK: Comparison of Preoxygenation Strategies for Intubation of Critically Ill Patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.621">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.621</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>2.     Chou CD, Palakshappa JA, Haynie H, Garcia K, Long D, Gibbs KW, White HD, Ghamande S, Dagan A, Stempek S, et al.: Association of Two Preoxygenation Approaches With Hypoxemia During Tracheal Intubation: A Secondary Analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.003">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.003</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>3.     Pitre T, Liu W, Zeraatkar D, Casey JD, Dionne JC, Gibbs KW, Ginde AA, Needham-Nethercott N, Rice TW, Semler MW, et al.: Preoxygenation strategies for intubation of patients who are critically ill: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2025;July;13(7):585–96.</p><p>4.     Gibbs KW, Semler MW, Driver BE, Seitz KP, Stempek SB, Taylor C, Resnick-Ault D, White HD, Gandotra S, Doerschug KC, et al.: Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation. N Engl J Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313680">10.1056/NEJMoa2313680</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>5.     Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, Resnick-Ault D, Seitz KP, Russell DW, Gaillard JP, Latimer AJ, Ghamande SA, Gibbs KW, et al.: Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;June 16;389(5):418–29.</p><p>6.     Trent SA, Kaji AH, Carlson JN, McCormick T, Haukoos JS, Brown CA, National EARI: Video Laryngoscopy is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann Emerg Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We've covered pre-oxygenation strategies and intubation alot on this podcast, mayber more than anyting else. We covered the definition of FPS in E74, the DEVICE trial on DL vs VL in E75, and the PREOXI trial of NIV vs Mask Pre-oxygenation in E86. Now we have another Preoxygenation paper, this one that reports no difference between preoxygenation with BVM and face mask. WTAF? Better listen, because it turns out words matter, definitions are... definitional, and we absolutely MUST read more than just the abstract.  </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Gottlieb M, Alexander R, Love AK: Comparison of Preoxygenation Strategies for Intubation of Critically Ill Patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.621">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.621</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>2.     Chou CD, Palakshappa JA, Haynie H, Garcia K, Long D, Gibbs KW, White HD, Ghamande S, Dagan A, Stempek S, et al.: Association of Two Preoxygenation Approaches With Hypoxemia During Tracheal Intubation: A Secondary Analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.003">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.003</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>3.     Pitre T, Liu W, Zeraatkar D, Casey JD, Dionne JC, Gibbs KW, Ginde AA, Needham-Nethercott N, Rice TW, Semler MW, et al.: Preoxygenation strategies for intubation of patients who are critically ill: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2025;July;13(7):585–96.</p><p>4.     Gibbs KW, Semler MW, Driver BE, Seitz KP, Stempek SB, Taylor C, Resnick-Ault D, White HD, Gandotra S, Doerschug KC, et al.: Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation. N Engl J Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313680">10.1056/NEJMoa2313680</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>5.     Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, Resnick-Ault D, Seitz KP, Russell DW, Gaillard JP, Latimer AJ, Ghamande SA, Gibbs KW, et al.: Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;June 16;389(5):418–29.</p><p>6.     Trent SA, Kaji AH, Carlson JN, McCormick T, Haukoos JS, Brown CA, National EARI: Video Laryngoscopy is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann Emerg Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/6ef61ead/ba8feab0.mp3" length="69002517" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/sCQ_-HpA8yqfwFLObJ-pNVsaNhQ3A-kAIqmchmAp6dY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yZjc3/OWM1MzZhY2IzZDE1/M2Y3NTBiZmNmMjg0/OWU3NS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2095</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We've covered pre-oxygenation strategies and intubation alot on this podcast, mayber more than anyting else. We covered the definition of FPS in E74, the DEVICE trial on DL vs VL in E75, and the PREOXI trial of NIV vs Mask Pre-oxygenation in E86. Now we have another Preoxygenation paper, this one that reports no difference between preoxygenation with BVM and face mask. WTAF? Better listen, because it turns out words matter, definitions are... definitional, and we absolutely MUST read more than just the abstract.  </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Gottlieb M, Alexander R, Love AK: Comparison of Preoxygenation Strategies for Intubation of Critically Ill Patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.621">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.621</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>2.     Chou CD, Palakshappa JA, Haynie H, Garcia K, Long D, Gibbs KW, White HD, Ghamande S, Dagan A, Stempek S, et al.: Association of Two Preoxygenation Approaches With Hypoxemia During Tracheal Intubation: A Secondary Analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.003">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.003</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>3.     Pitre T, Liu W, Zeraatkar D, Casey JD, Dionne JC, Gibbs KW, Ginde AA, Needham-Nethercott N, Rice TW, Semler MW, et al.: Preoxygenation strategies for intubation of patients who are critically ill: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2025;July;13(7):585–96.</p><p>4.     Gibbs KW, Semler MW, Driver BE, Seitz KP, Stempek SB, Taylor C, Resnick-Ault D, White HD, Gandotra S, Doerschug KC, et al.: Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation. N Engl J Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313680">10.1056/NEJMoa2313680</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>5.     Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, Resnick-Ault D, Seitz KP, Russell DW, Gaillard JP, Latimer AJ, Ghamande SA, Gibbs KW, et al.: Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;June 16;389(5):418–29.</p><p>6.     Trent SA, Kaji AH, Carlson JN, McCormick T, Haukoos JS, Brown CA, National EARI: Video Laryngoscopy is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann Emerg Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.115</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Evidence Based Medicine, Intubation, Preoyxgenation, RSI</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 100 - Amio v Lido in OHCA w Tanner Smida</title>
      <itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>100</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 100 - Amio v Lido in OHCA w Tanner Smida</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88ed817b-75b8-4fb9-b6de-3c8871f1d20a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/55433be9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The 2017 NEJM study, ALPS, compared amiodarone, lidocaine, and placebo for refractory shockable rhythms in adults with out of hospital cardiac arrest. They found no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge or functional survival between any of the arms. If that study has left you confused, you’re not alone. </p><p>And you’re in luck. Tanner Smida joins us again to discuss his latest paper using something called <em>target trial emulation</em> to assess the difference in ROSC and survival to discharge between amiodarone and lidocaine. This is a great discussion of his paper, the methodology, and how we can put his results into the context of ALPS.</p><p><strong>Citations:<br></strong><br></p><p>1.Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J: A retrospective ‘target trial emulation’ comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025;March;208:110515.</p><p>2. Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, Rea T, Nichol G, Morrison LJ, Leroux B, Vaillancourt C, Wittwer L, Callaway CW, et al.: Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;May 5;374(18):1711–22.</p><p>3.Hernán MA, Robins JM: Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available: Table 1. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;April 15;183(8):758–64.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The 2017 NEJM study, ALPS, compared amiodarone, lidocaine, and placebo for refractory shockable rhythms in adults with out of hospital cardiac arrest. They found no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge or functional survival between any of the arms. If that study has left you confused, you’re not alone. </p><p>And you’re in luck. Tanner Smida joins us again to discuss his latest paper using something called <em>target trial emulation</em> to assess the difference in ROSC and survival to discharge between amiodarone and lidocaine. This is a great discussion of his paper, the methodology, and how we can put his results into the context of ALPS.</p><p><strong>Citations:<br></strong><br></p><p>1.Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J: A retrospective ‘target trial emulation’ comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025;March;208:110515.</p><p>2. Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, Rea T, Nichol G, Morrison LJ, Leroux B, Vaillancourt C, Wittwer L, Callaway CW, et al.: Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;May 5;374(18):1711–22.</p><p>3.Hernán MA, Robins JM: Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available: Table 1. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;April 15;183(8):758–64.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/55433be9/26fa6389.mp3" length="83677695" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Hb0pD5Am927Be3_q5NnFB2bkci5oZCxz_wZAXVlBh20/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80NTE4/Y2Q3ZTViZjUxOTcy/NzUyNWU3MDJmNDk4/NGRlZS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2551</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>The 2017 NEJM study, ALPS, compared amiodarone, lidocaine, and placebo for refractory shockable rhythms in adults with out of hospital cardiac arrest. They found no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge or functional survival between any of the arms. If that study has left you confused, you’re not alone. </p><p>And you’re in luck. Tanner Smida joins us again to discuss his latest paper using something called <em>target trial emulation</em> to assess the difference in ROSC and survival to discharge between amiodarone and lidocaine. This is a great discussion of his paper, the methodology, and how we can put his results into the context of ALPS.</p><p><strong>Citations:<br></strong><br></p><p>1.Smida T, Crowe R, Price BS, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Shukis M, Bardes J: A retrospective ‘target trial emulation’ comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2025;March;208:110515.</p><p>2. Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, Rea T, Nichol G, Morrison LJ, Leroux B, Vaillancourt C, Wittwer L, Callaway CW, et al.: Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;May 5;374(18):1711–22.</p><p>3.Hernán MA, Robins JM: Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available: Table 1. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;April 15;183(8):758–64.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Cardiac Arrest, Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Science, Emergency Medicine, EBM, Target Trial Emulation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 99 - Adenosine or Diltiazem for SVT?</title>
      <itunes:episode>99</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>99</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 99 - Adenosine or Diltiazem for SVT?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea744e3d-40c6-46d1-b0d6-5c3052f697a6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2e25d939</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We just got a new paper that compares initial treatment with adenosine compared with diltiazem for the treatment of adults with SVT in the ED. Wouldn’t it be great if it turned out that diltiazem was just as effective, if not more effective, as adenosine without the crappy feeling? </p><p>Yeah, that’d be great, but what do we do with statistically insignificant results. Is there, perhaps, a way to save this “insignificant” paper? Fear not, Bayes is here! </p><p>Yes, that’s right, Dr. Jarvis is grabbing this new paper and diving straight back into that deep dark rabbit hole of Bayesian analysis. </p><p><strong>Citation:<br></strong><br></p><p>1.     Lee CA, Morrissey B, Chao K, Healy J, Ku K, Khan M, Kinteh E, Shedd A, Garrett J, Chou EH: Adenosine Versus Fixed-Dose Intravenous Bolus Diltiazem on Reversing Supraventricular Tachycardia in The Emergency Department: A Multi-Center Cohort Study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025;August 1;75:55–64.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We just got a new paper that compares initial treatment with adenosine compared with diltiazem for the treatment of adults with SVT in the ED. Wouldn’t it be great if it turned out that diltiazem was just as effective, if not more effective, as adenosine without the crappy feeling? </p><p>Yeah, that’d be great, but what do we do with statistically insignificant results. Is there, perhaps, a way to save this “insignificant” paper? Fear not, Bayes is here! </p><p>Yes, that’s right, Dr. Jarvis is grabbing this new paper and diving straight back into that deep dark rabbit hole of Bayesian analysis. </p><p><strong>Citation:<br></strong><br></p><p>1.     Lee CA, Morrissey B, Chao K, Healy J, Ku K, Khan M, Kinteh E, Shedd A, Garrett J, Chou EH: Adenosine Versus Fixed-Dose Intravenous Bolus Diltiazem on Reversing Supraventricular Tachycardia in The Emergency Department: A Multi-Center Cohort Study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025;August 1;75:55–64.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 04:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2e25d939/1b730ec8.mp3" length="66960283" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/YnQF2PVvMYvbh-vMTRzANH1lyLGFrRChKtzY5tdQhfY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8zMzYz/ODQ1MTQzZjMwZTU4/ODM0MmEzMzMwNTM4/ZmNiMi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2048</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We just got a new paper that compares initial treatment with adenosine compared with diltiazem for the treatment of adults with SVT in the ED. Wouldn’t it be great if it turned out that diltiazem was just as effective, if not more effective, as adenosine without the crappy feeling? </p><p>Yeah, that’d be great, but what do we do with statistically insignificant results. Is there, perhaps, a way to save this “insignificant” paper? Fear not, Bayes is here! </p><p>Yes, that’s right, Dr. Jarvis is grabbing this new paper and diving straight back into that deep dark rabbit hole of Bayesian analysis. </p><p><strong>Citation:<br></strong><br></p><p>1.     Lee CA, Morrissey B, Chao K, Healy J, Ku K, Khan M, Kinteh E, Shedd A, Garrett J, Chou EH: Adenosine Versus Fixed-Dose Intravenous Bolus Diltiazem on Reversing Supraventricular Tachycardia in The Emergency Department: A Multi-Center Cohort Study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025;August 1;75:55–64.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, SVT, Tachycardia, Adenosine, Diltiazem, Bayesian</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 98 - Does the Sequence of RSI Medications Matter</title>
      <itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>98</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 98 - Does the Sequence of RSI Medications Matter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6eb9ab4-db00-41f9-afcd-7d95777bbd42</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d7af0cd6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The next time you go to intubate a patient, should you give the sedation before the paralytic or the paralytic before the sedative? Does it matter? And what the hell does Bayes have to do with any of this? Dr Jarvis reviews a paper that uses Bayesian statistics to calculate the association between drug sequence and first attempt failure. Then he returns to Nerd Valley to talk about how to interpret 95% confidence intervals derived from frequentists statistics compared to 95% credible intervals that come from Bayesian statistics. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Catoire P, Driver B, Prekker ME, Freund Y: Effect of administration sequence of induction agents on first‐attempt failure during emergency intubation: A Bayesian analysis of a prospective cohort. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025;February;32(2):123–9. </p><p>2.     Casey JD, Janz DR, Russell DW, Vonderhaar DJ, Joffe AM, Dischert KM, Brown RM, Zouk AN, Gulati S, Heideman BE, et al.: Bag-Mask Ventilation during Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2019;February 28;380(9):811–21.</p><p>3.     Greer A, Hewitt M, Khazaneh PT, Ergan B, Burry L, Semler MW, Rochwerg B, Sharif S: Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Critical Care Medicine. 2025;February;53(2):e374–83.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The next time you go to intubate a patient, should you give the sedation before the paralytic or the paralytic before the sedative? Does it matter? And what the hell does Bayes have to do with any of this? Dr Jarvis reviews a paper that uses Bayesian statistics to calculate the association between drug sequence and first attempt failure. Then he returns to Nerd Valley to talk about how to interpret 95% confidence intervals derived from frequentists statistics compared to 95% credible intervals that come from Bayesian statistics. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Catoire P, Driver B, Prekker ME, Freund Y: Effect of administration sequence of induction agents on first‐attempt failure during emergency intubation: A Bayesian analysis of a prospective cohort. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025;February;32(2):123–9. </p><p>2.     Casey JD, Janz DR, Russell DW, Vonderhaar DJ, Joffe AM, Dischert KM, Brown RM, Zouk AN, Gulati S, Heideman BE, et al.: Bag-Mask Ventilation during Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2019;February 28;380(9):811–21.</p><p>3.     Greer A, Hewitt M, Khazaneh PT, Ergan B, Burry L, Semler MW, Rochwerg B, Sharif S: Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Critical Care Medicine. 2025;February;53(2):e374–83.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2025 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/d7af0cd6/fe0af021.mp3" length="63600269" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/s_rXLni_tqjI6ToawZj2Wm5YqCUNkXFs5y-PpQ9SYoM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yMTM2/NzAwOGY5ZDI1ZWQ0/OTgzMTQxYTZhMjBi/YjVjNi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1940</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>The next time you go to intubate a patient, should you give the sedation before the paralytic or the paralytic before the sedative? Does it matter? And what the hell does Bayes have to do with any of this? Dr Jarvis reviews a paper that uses Bayesian statistics to calculate the association between drug sequence and first attempt failure. Then he returns to Nerd Valley to talk about how to interpret 95% confidence intervals derived from frequentists statistics compared to 95% credible intervals that come from Bayesian statistics. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Catoire P, Driver B, Prekker ME, Freund Y: Effect of administration sequence of induction agents on first‐attempt failure during emergency intubation: A Bayesian analysis of a prospective cohort. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025;February;32(2):123–9. </p><p>2.     Casey JD, Janz DR, Russell DW, Vonderhaar DJ, Joffe AM, Dischert KM, Brown RM, Zouk AN, Gulati S, Heideman BE, et al.: Bag-Mask Ventilation during Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2019;February 28;380(9):811–21.</p><p>3.     Greer A, Hewitt M, Khazaneh PT, Ergan B, Burry L, Semler MW, Rochwerg B, Sharif S: Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Critical Care Medicine. 2025;February;53(2):e374–83.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Intubation, RSI, Bayes, Bayesian, Science, Evidence Based Medicine, Emergency Medicine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E97 - Bayes and Calcium Before Diltiazem in Atrial Fibrillation</title>
      <itunes:episode>97</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>97</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E97 - Bayes and Calcium Before Diltiazem in Atrial Fibrillation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6247916-3cba-4a92-aa95-af71e3f1921c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d8f7aabf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We covered a paper in episode 81 that suggested treating atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in the field could lower mortality. But it also drops BP a bit. Could pretreating these patients with calcium lower the risk of hypotension? Dr Jarvis puts on his nerd hat and uses Bayesian analysis to assess a new randomized, placebo-controlled study that looked at just this thing. Why is he going off on this Bayes thing? Because he’s been reading a couple of book on it and wanted to take it for a spin. </p><p> </p><p>Tables:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Charts:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Bayesian Distributions:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p> </p><p>1.     Az A, Sogut O, Dogan Y, Akdemir T, Ergenc H, Umit TB, Celik AF, Armagan BN, Bilici E, Cakmak S: Reducing diltiazem-related hypotension in atrial fibrillation: Role of pretreatment intravenous calcium. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025;February;88:23–8.</p><p>2.     Fornage LB, O’Neil C, Dowker SR, Wanta ER, Lewis RS, Brown LH: Prehospital Intervention Improves Outcomes for Patients Presenting in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885">10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>3.     Kolkebeck T, Abbrescia K, Pfaff J, Glynn T, Ward JA: Calcium chloride before i.v. diltiazem in the management of atrial fibrillation. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004;May 1;26(4):395–400.</p><p>4.     Chivers T: Everything Is Predictable: How Bayes’ Remarkable Theorem Explains the World. Weidenfeld &amp; Nicolson, 2024.</p><p>5.     McGrayne SB: The Theory That Would Not Die. how Bayes’ Rule Cracked The Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines &amp; Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2011.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We covered a paper in episode 81 that suggested treating atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in the field could lower mortality. But it also drops BP a bit. Could pretreating these patients with calcium lower the risk of hypotension? Dr Jarvis puts on his nerd hat and uses Bayesian analysis to assess a new randomized, placebo-controlled study that looked at just this thing. Why is he going off on this Bayes thing? Because he’s been reading a couple of book on it and wanted to take it for a spin. </p><p> </p><p>Tables:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Charts:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Bayesian Distributions:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p> </p><p>1.     Az A, Sogut O, Dogan Y, Akdemir T, Ergenc H, Umit TB, Celik AF, Armagan BN, Bilici E, Cakmak S: Reducing diltiazem-related hypotension in atrial fibrillation: Role of pretreatment intravenous calcium. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025;February;88:23–8.</p><p>2.     Fornage LB, O’Neil C, Dowker SR, Wanta ER, Lewis RS, Brown LH: Prehospital Intervention Improves Outcomes for Patients Presenting in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885">10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>3.     Kolkebeck T, Abbrescia K, Pfaff J, Glynn T, Ward JA: Calcium chloride before i.v. diltiazem in the management of atrial fibrillation. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004;May 1;26(4):395–400.</p><p>4.     Chivers T: Everything Is Predictable: How Bayes’ Remarkable Theorem Explains the World. Weidenfeld &amp; Nicolson, 2024.</p><p>5.     McGrayne SB: The Theory That Would Not Die. how Bayes’ Rule Cracked The Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines &amp; Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2011.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 01:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/d8f7aabf/82d943f2.mp3" length="75630984" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/q4ORtgS7yxH7EXTlh6Dn56gcshP4aoXgm5acWK8nNQY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8wMTE4/MmM5ODI0Mzg2M2Nh/NTUwZmMzN2MzNGIz/MzA4Mi5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2300</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We covered a paper in episode 81 that suggested treating atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in the field could lower mortality. But it also drops BP a bit. Could pretreating these patients with calcium lower the risk of hypotension? Dr Jarvis puts on his nerd hat and uses Bayesian analysis to assess a new randomized, placebo-controlled study that looked at just this thing. Why is he going off on this Bayes thing? Because he’s been reading a couple of book on it and wanted to take it for a spin. </p><p> </p><p>Tables:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Charts:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Bayesian Distributions:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p> </p><p>1.     Az A, Sogut O, Dogan Y, Akdemir T, Ergenc H, Umit TB, Celik AF, Armagan BN, Bilici E, Cakmak S: Reducing diltiazem-related hypotension in atrial fibrillation: Role of pretreatment intravenous calcium. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025;February;88:23–8.</p><p>2.     Fornage LB, O’Neil C, Dowker SR, Wanta ER, Lewis RS, Brown LH: Prehospital Intervention Improves Outcomes for Patients Presenting in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885">10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>3.     Kolkebeck T, Abbrescia K, Pfaff J, Glynn T, Ward JA: Calcium chloride before i.v. diltiazem in the management of atrial fibrillation. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004;May 1;26(4):395–400.</p><p>4.     Chivers T: Everything Is Predictable: How Bayes’ Remarkable Theorem Explains the World. Weidenfeld &amp; Nicolson, 2024.</p><p>5.     McGrayne SB: The Theory That Would Not Die. how Bayes’ Rule Cracked The Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines &amp; Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2011.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, AFib, Atrial Fibrillation, Bayes, Bayesian Analysis, Statistics, EBG, Evidence Based Medicine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E96 - MCD Wrap Up</title>
      <itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>96</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E96 - MCD Wrap Up</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">755053e1-6ca1-45df-ae3f-b9edaf1b77dd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/35df1694</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Wrapping up a series of 5 episodes, Dr Jarvis finishes his discussion of mechanical CPR devices (MCDs) talking about papers from Utah, Vienna, Anchorage, and Cincinnati and then gives his take on how to interpret the literature and put it into practice.</p><p>Papers discussed:</p><p>1)    Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.</p><p>2)    Zeiner S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5.</p><p>3)    Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.</p><p>4)    Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;March 9;28(1):114–7.</p><p>5)    Grunau B, Reynolds J, Scheuermeyer F, Stenstom R, Stub D, Pennington S, Cheskes S, Ramanathan K, Christenson J: Relationship between Time-to-ROSC and Survival in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest ECPR Candidates: When is the Best Time to Consider Transport to Hospital? Prehospital Emergency Care. 2016;September 2;20(5):615–22.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Wrapping up a series of 5 episodes, Dr Jarvis finishes his discussion of mechanical CPR devices (MCDs) talking about papers from Utah, Vienna, Anchorage, and Cincinnati and then gives his take on how to interpret the literature and put it into practice.</p><p>Papers discussed:</p><p>1)    Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.</p><p>2)    Zeiner S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5.</p><p>3)    Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.</p><p>4)    Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;March 9;28(1):114–7.</p><p>5)    Grunau B, Reynolds J, Scheuermeyer F, Stenstom R, Stub D, Pennington S, Cheskes S, Ramanathan K, Christenson J: Relationship between Time-to-ROSC and Survival in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest ECPR Candidates: When is the Best Time to Consider Transport to Hospital? Prehospital Emergency Care. 2016;September 2;20(5):615–22.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/35df1694/70386e7b.mp3" length="64526269" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/TnFtBAh0_hBui8PB_nsi9h6kLwGYi0A6RDga3kcvEl4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hYmI4/MGFjMDY5ZTk1OGRh/YzU1NjBlNDdlNGQ2/N2M0NC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1962</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Wrapping up a series of 5 episodes, Dr Jarvis finishes his discussion of mechanical CPR devices (MCDs) talking about papers from Utah, Vienna, Anchorage, and Cincinnati and then gives his take on how to interpret the literature and put it into practice.</p><p>Papers discussed:</p><p>1)    Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.</p><p>2)    Zeiner S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5.</p><p>3)    Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.</p><p>4)    Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;March 9;28(1):114–7.</p><p>5)    Grunau B, Reynolds J, Scheuermeyer F, Stenstom R, Stub D, Pennington S, Cheskes S, Ramanathan K, Christenson J: Relationship between Time-to-ROSC and Survival in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest ECPR Candidates: When is the Best Time to Consider Transport to Hospital? Prehospital Emergency Care. 2016;September 2;20(5):615–22.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Mechanical CPR, LUCAS, AutoPulse</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E95 - LUCAS Literature</title>
      <itunes:episode>95</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>95</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E95 - LUCAS Literature</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">440eee8e-a4e7-431d-ad5d-e175af30124e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/10da37f5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last episode we described the literature showing no survival benefit to patients with the AutoPulse device. Fear not, I wasn’t ignoring the LUCAS, I just felt it deserved it’s own episode. We’ll cover the LINC and PARAMEDIC randomized controlled trials and the secondary analysis of LINC in shockable rhythms. </p><p>I switched to a new production process using a new mic (Rode NT1) and started using ecamm to record. Yes, I know there is a bit of AV dysynchrony.. I’m working on it. I still have a lot to learn about ecamm but am optimistic about it. </p><p>Citations on LUCAS device:</p><p>1. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–61.</p><p>2. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.</p><p>3. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.</p><p> </p><p>Citations on Jeff’s Tamiflu Rant</p><p>1. Jefferson T, Jones M, Doshi P, Spencer EA, Onakpoya I, Heneghan CJ: Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments. BMJ. 2014;348:g2545.</p><p>2. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Hama R, Thompson MJ, Onakpoya I, Heneghan CJ: Risk of bias in industry-funded oseltamivir trials: comparison of core reports versus full clinical study reports. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005253.</p><p>3. Jefferson T: The Tamiflu Story: Why We Need Access To All Data From Clinical Trials. Open Knowledge Foundation Blog.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last episode we described the literature showing no survival benefit to patients with the AutoPulse device. Fear not, I wasn’t ignoring the LUCAS, I just felt it deserved it’s own episode. We’ll cover the LINC and PARAMEDIC randomized controlled trials and the secondary analysis of LINC in shockable rhythms. </p><p>I switched to a new production process using a new mic (Rode NT1) and started using ecamm to record. Yes, I know there is a bit of AV dysynchrony.. I’m working on it. I still have a lot to learn about ecamm but am optimistic about it. </p><p>Citations on LUCAS device:</p><p>1. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–61.</p><p>2. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.</p><p>3. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.</p><p> </p><p>Citations on Jeff’s Tamiflu Rant</p><p>1. Jefferson T, Jones M, Doshi P, Spencer EA, Onakpoya I, Heneghan CJ: Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments. BMJ. 2014;348:g2545.</p><p>2. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Hama R, Thompson MJ, Onakpoya I, Heneghan CJ: Risk of bias in industry-funded oseltamivir trials: comparison of core reports versus full clinical study reports. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005253.</p><p>3. Jefferson T: The Tamiflu Story: Why We Need Access To All Data From Clinical Trials. Open Knowledge Foundation Blog.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 02:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/10da37f5/7d12e5b8.mp3" length="65110556" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/L681h2w3tzWOXiggRUfLQnI6Egg9yL8l1CS2qIsUrFw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mMmQ2/Nzc1OTc2OWVjNmM4/MzE0NmViYzhjZTQw/NDQ3MS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1978</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last episode we described the literature showing no survival benefit to patients with the AutoPulse device. Fear not, I wasn’t ignoring the LUCAS, I just felt it deserved it’s own episode. We’ll cover the LINC and PARAMEDIC randomized controlled trials and the secondary analysis of LINC in shockable rhythms. </p><p>I switched to a new production process using a new mic (Rode NT1) and started using ecamm to record. Yes, I know there is a bit of AV dysynchrony.. I’m working on it. I still have a lot to learn about ecamm but am optimistic about it. </p><p>Citations on LUCAS device:</p><p>1. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–61.</p><p>2. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.</p><p>3. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.</p><p> </p><p>Citations on Jeff’s Tamiflu Rant</p><p>1. Jefferson T, Jones M, Doshi P, Spencer EA, Onakpoya I, Heneghan CJ: Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments. BMJ. 2014;348:g2545.</p><p>2. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Hama R, Thompson MJ, Onakpoya I, Heneghan CJ: Risk of bias in industry-funded oseltamivir trials: comparison of core reports versus full clinical study reports. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005253.</p><p>3. Jefferson T: The Tamiflu Story: Why We Need Access To All Data From Clinical Trials. Open Knowledge Foundation Blog.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Literature, Science, Cardiac Arrest, LUCAS, Mechanical Compressions, CPR</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E94 - AutoPulse Literature</title>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>94</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E94 - AutoPulse Literature</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c41827a-4ae1-4d9b-83fc-a4b01a22cd55</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6a5d951b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our story so far.. episode 92 looked at a study showing lower survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients treated with mechanical compression devices. Episode 93 discussed an implementation study of implementing LUCAS devices in a system with high quality pit crew CPR also showing lower survival, despite spending lots of time in training on how to optimally apply the LUCAS to avoid prolonged compression interruptions and movement. </p><p>Now we’re diving into the literature around AutoPulse, the load-distributing band device. We’ll cover two randomized controlled trials and one well-done observational study comparing AutoPulse to manual CPR. Don’t worry, LUCAS studies will be in the next episode.</p><p>Citations<br>1.	Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Christenson J, Anton AR, Mosesso VN, Van Ottingham L, Olsufka M, Pennington S, White LJ, et al.: Manual Chest Compression vs Use of an Automated Chest Compression Device During Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).<br>2.	Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, Dhindsa HS, Best AM, Ines CS, Hickey S, Clark B, Williams DC, Powell RG, et al.: Use of an Automated, Load-Distributing Band Chest Compression Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).<br>3.	Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our story so far.. episode 92 looked at a study showing lower survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients treated with mechanical compression devices. Episode 93 discussed an implementation study of implementing LUCAS devices in a system with high quality pit crew CPR also showing lower survival, despite spending lots of time in training on how to optimally apply the LUCAS to avoid prolonged compression interruptions and movement. </p><p>Now we’re diving into the literature around AutoPulse, the load-distributing band device. We’ll cover two randomized controlled trials and one well-done observational study comparing AutoPulse to manual CPR. Don’t worry, LUCAS studies will be in the next episode.</p><p>Citations<br>1.	Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Christenson J, Anton AR, Mosesso VN, Van Ottingham L, Olsufka M, Pennington S, White LJ, et al.: Manual Chest Compression vs Use of an Automated Chest Compression Device During Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).<br>2.	Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, Dhindsa HS, Best AM, Ines CS, Hickey S, Clark B, Williams DC, Powell RG, et al.: Use of an Automated, Load-Distributing Band Chest Compression Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).<br>3.	Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/6a5d951b/a32d2b4c.mp3" length="72527037" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/lln71mM_4-WDlGDLZCX_4Qe5G7FadRV5RQpkH3FxqR4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9kM2Rm/OGFlZGJlZTZjYzJj/YjE0MDllZmM2Y2Ux/YTdlOC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2204</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our story so far.. episode 92 looked at a study showing lower survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients treated with mechanical compression devices. Episode 93 discussed an implementation study of implementing LUCAS devices in a system with high quality pit crew CPR also showing lower survival, despite spending lots of time in training on how to optimally apply the LUCAS to avoid prolonged compression interruptions and movement. </p><p>Now we’re diving into the literature around AutoPulse, the load-distributing band device. We’ll cover two randomized controlled trials and one well-done observational study comparing AutoPulse to manual CPR. Don’t worry, LUCAS studies will be in the next episode.</p><p>Citations<br>1.	Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Christenson J, Anton AR, Mosesso VN, Van Ottingham L, Olsufka M, Pennington S, White LJ, et al.: Manual Chest Compression vs Use of an Automated Chest Compression Device During Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).<br>2.	Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, Dhindsa HS, Best AM, Ines CS, Hickey S, Clark B, Williams DC, Powell RG, et al.: Use of an Automated, Load-Distributing Band Chest Compression Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).<br>3.	Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, Cardiac Arrest, AutoPulse, Mechanical Compression Devices, Evidence Based Medicine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E93 - LUCAS: The Austin Experience</title>
      <itunes:episode>93</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>93</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E93 - LUCAS: The Austin Experience</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e17e2c1b-b99c-4143-ae79-79435ce6a556</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5f00f172</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder what would happen to cardiac arrest survival after a system implements LUCAS devices and trains really hard to deploy them appropriately? Wonder no more. Dr Jarvis reviews a paper from the Austin/Travis County EMS System that will shed some light on the question. This is the second episode in a series on mechanical compression devices.  </p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.</p><p>2.     Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder what would happen to cardiac arrest survival after a system implements LUCAS devices and trains really hard to deploy them appropriately? Wonder no more. Dr Jarvis reviews a paper from the Austin/Travis County EMS System that will shed some light on the question. This is the second episode in a series on mechanical compression devices.  </p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.</p><p>2.     Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 02:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/5f00f172/03f5162c.mp3" length="44461065" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/iLzy4ehGAoUa33OU5a_0vYW3zIUtfV0FsPvUqUIcLCs/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83MDZh/M2Y4NTdiNzM1ZTU5/MzFkOWE1N2YxNzNm/Mzk5Zi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder what would happen to cardiac arrest survival after a system implements LUCAS devices and trains really hard to deploy them appropriately? Wonder no more. Dr Jarvis reviews a paper from the Austin/Travis County EMS System that will shed some light on the question. This is the second episode in a series on mechanical compression devices.  </p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Citations:</p><p>1.     Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.</p><p>2.     Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, Evidence, Literature, Cardiac Arrest, Mechanical Compression, LUCAS</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 92 - Mechanical CPR in InHospital Arrest</title>
      <itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>92</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 92 - Mechanical CPR in InHospital Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ecbe87ee-0ffc-48b8-925d-30108e32d742</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/82ef819a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We know the literature on mechanical CPR devices on mortality in out of hospital cardiac arrest (we DO know this literature, right?), but what about in-hospital arrest? Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper that uses the AHA Get With The Guidelines - Resuscitation registry to assess the association between MCDs and mortality. </p><p>Citations<br>1. Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.<br>2. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–61<br>3. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.<br>4.  Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.<br>5.  Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.<br>6. Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DVM, Verheugt FWA, Smeets JLRM, Boer M-J de: Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med Annals of emergency medicine. 2016;67(3):349-360.e3.<br>7. Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.<br>8. Koster RW, Beenen LF, Van Der Boom EB, Spijkerboer AM, Tepaske R, Van Der Wal AC, Beesems SG, Tijssen JG: Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. European Heart Journal. 2017;October 21;38(40):3006–13.<br>9. Primi R, Bendotti S, Currao A, Sechi GM, Marconi G, Pamploni G, Panni G, Sgotti D, Zorzi E, Cazzaniga M, et al.: Use of Mechanical Chest Compression for Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—Device Matters: A Propensity-Score-Based Match Analysis. JCM. 2023;June 30;12(13):4429.<br>10. Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.<br>11.  S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5. <br>12. Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2183294 (Epub ahead of print).<br>13.  Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.<br>14.  Li H, Wang D, Yu Y, Zhao X, Jing X: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;December;24(1):10.<br>15.  Sheraton M, Columbus J, Surani S, Chopra R, Kashyap R: Effectiveness of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices over Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. WestJEM. 2021;July 19;22(4):810–9.<br>16.  Wang PL, Brooks SC: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;20;8:CD007260.<br>17.  Zhu N, Chen Q, Jiang Z, Liao F, Kou B, Tang H, Zhou M: A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Crit Care. 2019;December;23(1):100.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We know the literature on mechanical CPR devices on mortality in out of hospital cardiac arrest (we DO know this literature, right?), but what about in-hospital arrest? Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper that uses the AHA Get With The Guidelines - Resuscitation registry to assess the association between MCDs and mortality. </p><p>Citations<br>1. Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.<br>2. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–61<br>3. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.<br>4.  Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.<br>5.  Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.<br>6. Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DVM, Verheugt FWA, Smeets JLRM, Boer M-J de: Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med Annals of emergency medicine. 2016;67(3):349-360.e3.<br>7. Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.<br>8. Koster RW, Beenen LF, Van Der Boom EB, Spijkerboer AM, Tepaske R, Van Der Wal AC, Beesems SG, Tijssen JG: Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. European Heart Journal. 2017;October 21;38(40):3006–13.<br>9. Primi R, Bendotti S, Currao A, Sechi GM, Marconi G, Pamploni G, Panni G, Sgotti D, Zorzi E, Cazzaniga M, et al.: Use of Mechanical Chest Compression for Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—Device Matters: A Propensity-Score-Based Match Analysis. JCM. 2023;June 30;12(13):4429.<br>10. Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.<br>11.  S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5. <br>12. Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2183294 (Epub ahead of print).<br>13.  Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.<br>14.  Li H, Wang D, Yu Y, Zhao X, Jing X: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;December;24(1):10.<br>15.  Sheraton M, Columbus J, Surani S, Chopra R, Kashyap R: Effectiveness of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices over Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. WestJEM. 2021;July 19;22(4):810–9.<br>16.  Wang PL, Brooks SC: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;20;8:CD007260.<br>17.  Zhu N, Chen Q, Jiang Z, Liao F, Kou B, Tang H, Zhou M: A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Crit Care. 2019;December;23(1):100.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 06:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/82ef819a/ecdaad52.mp3" length="22799438" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/5qoPAtOBxfgDus2nR9SusvGDBL__ebctlPxif9Mbwrk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS85MDgz/Mjg4ZjExMjc3Mzc0/ZGMzYWQ5ZDA4YmUx/NDllOC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1609</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We know the literature on mechanical CPR devices on mortality in out of hospital cardiac arrest (we DO know this literature, right?), but what about in-hospital arrest? Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper that uses the AHA Get With The Guidelines - Resuscitation registry to assess the association between MCDs and mortality. </p><p>Citations<br>1. Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.<br>2. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–61<br>3. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.<br>4.  Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.<br>5.  Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.<br>6. Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DVM, Verheugt FWA, Smeets JLRM, Boer M-J de: Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med Annals of emergency medicine. 2016;67(3):349-360.e3.<br>7. Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.<br>8. Koster RW, Beenen LF, Van Der Boom EB, Spijkerboer AM, Tepaske R, Van Der Wal AC, Beesems SG, Tijssen JG: Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. European Heart Journal. 2017;October 21;38(40):3006–13.<br>9. Primi R, Bendotti S, Currao A, Sechi GM, Marconi G, Pamploni G, Panni G, Sgotti D, Zorzi E, Cazzaniga M, et al.: Use of Mechanical Chest Compression for Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—Device Matters: A Propensity-Score-Based Match Analysis. JCM. 2023;June 30;12(13):4429.<br>10. Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.<br>11.  S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5. <br>12. Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2183294 (Epub ahead of print).<br>13.  Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.<br>14.  Li H, Wang D, Yu Y, Zhao X, Jing X: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;December;24(1):10.<br>15.  Sheraton M, Columbus J, Surani S, Chopra R, Kashyap R: Effectiveness of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices over Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. WestJEM. 2021;July 19;22(4):810–9.<br>16.  Wang PL, Brooks SC: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;20;8:CD007260.<br>17.  Zhu N, Chen Q, Jiang Z, Liao F, Kou B, Tang H, Zhou M: A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Crit Care. 2019;December;23(1):100.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, Cardiac Arrest, Mechanical CPR</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 91 - The Bloody Details</title>
      <itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>91</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 91 - The Bloody Details</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5581887c-6b0d-4762-8f72-ca9fabc37f3b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2b577d8c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>New Orleans implemented a blood program and assessed the impact of the program on mortality. Dr Jarvis dives into the details of the paper and then Dr Remle Crowe joins in for a discussion on why studying blood in the field is so difficult. </p><p>Citation: <br>Broome JM, Nordham KD, Piehl M, Tatum D, Caputo S, Belding C, De Maio VJ, Taghavi S, Jackson-Weaver O, Harris C, et al.: Faster refill in an urban emergency medical services system saves lives: A prospective preliminary evaluation of a prehospital advanced resuscitative care bundle. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;May;96(5):702–7.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>New Orleans implemented a blood program and assessed the impact of the program on mortality. Dr Jarvis dives into the details of the paper and then Dr Remle Crowe joins in for a discussion on why studying blood in the field is so difficult. </p><p>Citation: <br>Broome JM, Nordham KD, Piehl M, Tatum D, Caputo S, Belding C, De Maio VJ, Taghavi S, Jackson-Weaver O, Harris C, et al.: Faster refill in an urban emergency medical services system saves lives: A prospective preliminary evaluation of a prehospital advanced resuscitative care bundle. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;May;96(5):702–7.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2b577d8c/b608ff76.mp3" length="33088016" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/YyCOQS95yggtOE6c_QIalFG8Ogmuz4C6G0uv0YStVYs/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80Nzk1/M2ExNjhkZTkzM2Ez/YjMyNWE0YzM5Njgz/YWQ4ZC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2346</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>New Orleans implemented a blood program and assessed the impact of the program on mortality. Dr Jarvis dives into the details of the paper and then Dr Remle Crowe joins in for a discussion on why studying blood in the field is so difficult. </p><p>Citation: <br>Broome JM, Nordham KD, Piehl M, Tatum D, Caputo S, Belding C, De Maio VJ, Taghavi S, Jackson-Weaver O, Harris C, et al.: Faster refill in an urban emergency medical services system saves lives: A prospective preliminary evaluation of a prehospital advanced resuscitative care bundle. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;May;96(5):702–7.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Science, Literature, Blood, Methodology, Research</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep90 - IV vs IO in OHCA</title>
      <itunes:episode>90</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>90</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep90 - IV vs IO in OHCA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">501048ca-52ae-43b7-ac4f-533090f10a01</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/497aac8e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We've reviewed several papers in the past that suggest there might be an advantage to using IV access compared to IO access for medications in cardiac arrest. Is that really a thing? Wouldn't it be great if we had some randomized controlled trials to help answer the questions?  </p><p>Funny you should mention RCTs. Dr Jarvis reviews three (THREE!) new RCTs that compare IV to IO access in out of hospital cardiac arrest to try to shed some of that bright light of science on this question!</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, Mikkelsen S, Folke F, Christensen HC, Povlsen AL, Petersen AH, Winther S, Frilund LW, et al.: Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med.</p><p>2. Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M: A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;28(6):1–23.</p><p>3. Nielsen N: The Way to a Patient’s Heart — Vascular Access in Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2412901">10.1056/NEJMe2412901</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>4. Ko Y-C, Lin H-Y, Huang EP-C, Lee A-F, Hsieh M-J, Yang C-W, Lee B-C, Wang Y-C, Yang W-S, Chien Y-C, et al.: Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in upper extremity among adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: cluster randomised clinical trial (VICTOR trial). BMJ. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079878">10.1136/bmj-2024-079878</a> (Epub ahead of print).<br>5. Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, Rea T, Nichol G, Morrison LJ, Leroux B, Vaillancourt C, Wittwer L, Callaway CW, et al.: Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;May 5;374(18):1711–22.</p><p>6.Daya MR, Leroux BG, Dorian P, Rea TD, Newgard CD, Morrison LJ, Lupton JR, Menegazzi JJ, Ornato JP, Sopko G, et al.: Survival After Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Shock-Refractory Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2020;January 21;141(3):188–98.</p><p>7. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Ji C, Gates S, Rosser A, Lall R, Perkins GD: Intraosseous versus intravenous administration of adrenaline in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC2 placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7">10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We've reviewed several papers in the past that suggest there might be an advantage to using IV access compared to IO access for medications in cardiac arrest. Is that really a thing? Wouldn't it be great if we had some randomized controlled trials to help answer the questions?  </p><p>Funny you should mention RCTs. Dr Jarvis reviews three (THREE!) new RCTs that compare IV to IO access in out of hospital cardiac arrest to try to shed some of that bright light of science on this question!</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, Mikkelsen S, Folke F, Christensen HC, Povlsen AL, Petersen AH, Winther S, Frilund LW, et al.: Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med.</p><p>2. Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M: A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;28(6):1–23.</p><p>3. Nielsen N: The Way to a Patient’s Heart — Vascular Access in Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2412901">10.1056/NEJMe2412901</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>4. Ko Y-C, Lin H-Y, Huang EP-C, Lee A-F, Hsieh M-J, Yang C-W, Lee B-C, Wang Y-C, Yang W-S, Chien Y-C, et al.: Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in upper extremity among adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: cluster randomised clinical trial (VICTOR trial). BMJ. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079878">10.1136/bmj-2024-079878</a> (Epub ahead of print).<br>5. Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, Rea T, Nichol G, Morrison LJ, Leroux B, Vaillancourt C, Wittwer L, Callaway CW, et al.: Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;May 5;374(18):1711–22.</p><p>6.Daya MR, Leroux BG, Dorian P, Rea TD, Newgard CD, Morrison LJ, Lupton JR, Menegazzi JJ, Ornato JP, Sopko G, et al.: Survival After Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Shock-Refractory Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2020;January 21;141(3):188–98.</p><p>7. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Ji C, Gates S, Rosser A, Lall R, Perkins GD: Intraosseous versus intravenous administration of adrenaline in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC2 placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7">10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 02:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/497aac8e/ef901a82.mp3" length="63149676" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_KEwy3AmUnaXoUoGkyYo20lBYC0Apf9JFOS-ei8iEkY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jYWU2/NWJmNmIwMTM1ZTc2/ZDVhYWZlZGRiYzQz/ZGRjMS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1937</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We've reviewed several papers in the past that suggest there might be an advantage to using IV access compared to IO access for medications in cardiac arrest. Is that really a thing? Wouldn't it be great if we had some randomized controlled trials to help answer the questions?  </p><p>Funny you should mention RCTs. Dr Jarvis reviews three (THREE!) new RCTs that compare IV to IO access in out of hospital cardiac arrest to try to shed some of that bright light of science on this question!</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Vallentin MF, Granfeldt A, Klitgaard TL, Mikkelsen S, Folke F, Christensen HC, Povlsen AL, Petersen AH, Winther S, Frilund LW, et al.: Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med.</p><p>2. Smida T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff T, Goebel M: A retrospective comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;28(6):1–23.</p><p>3. Nielsen N: The Way to a Patient’s Heart — Vascular Access in Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2412901">10.1056/NEJMe2412901</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>4. Ko Y-C, Lin H-Y, Huang EP-C, Lee A-F, Hsieh M-J, Yang C-W, Lee B-C, Wang Y-C, Yang W-S, Chien Y-C, et al.: Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in upper extremity among adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: cluster randomised clinical trial (VICTOR trial). BMJ. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079878">10.1136/bmj-2024-079878</a> (Epub ahead of print).<br>5. Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, Rea T, Nichol G, Morrison LJ, Leroux B, Vaillancourt C, Wittwer L, Callaway CW, et al.: Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;May 5;374(18):1711–22.</p><p>6.Daya MR, Leroux BG, Dorian P, Rea TD, Newgard CD, Morrison LJ, Lupton JR, Menegazzi JJ, Ornato JP, Sopko G, et al.: Survival After Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Shock-Refractory Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2020;January 21;141(3):188–98.</p><p>7. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Ji C, Gates S, Rosser A, Lall R, Perkins GD: Intraosseous versus intravenous administration of adrenaline in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC2 placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7">10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Science, Literature, Cardiac Arrest, Vascular Access, Evidence Based Medicine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/497aac8e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 89 - IM Epi in OHCA, Part II</title>
      <itunes:episode>89</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>89</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 89 - IM Epi in OHCA, Part II</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2af3c805-fb6b-4ab7-9dfc-8626d056622b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/69292fac</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in episode 80 we discussed a feasibility study out of Salt Lake City that showed IM epi resulted in 3-minute faster administration in cardiac arrest. It was underpowered to show survival, however. Fortunately, the great folks in Salt Lake City is back with a larger bite at the statistical apple. Dr Jarvis discusses the background around what we know about epinephrine in cardiac arrest (briefly, for once), walks us through this new study, and puts it in context of modern clinical practice. </p><p>Citations.</p><p>1. Palatinus HN, Johnson MA, Wang HE, Hoareau GL, Youngquist ST: Early intramuscular adrenaline administration is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2024;August;201:110266.</p><p>2. Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, Quinn T, Nolan JP, Scomparin C, Regan S, Long J, Slowther A, Pocock H, et al.: A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;August 23;379(8):711–21.</p><p>3. Okubo M, Komukai S, Callaway CW, Izawa J: Association of Timing of Epinephrine Administration With Outcomes in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;August 10;4(8):e2120176.</p><p>4. Hubble MW, Tyson C: Impact of Early Vasopressor Administration on Neurological Outcomes after Prolonged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;June;32(3):297–304.</p><p>5.  Pugh AE, Stoecklein HH, Tonna JE, Hoareau GL, Johnson MA, Youngquist ST: Intramuscular adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with faster drug delivery: A feasibility study. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;September;7:100142.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in episode 80 we discussed a feasibility study out of Salt Lake City that showed IM epi resulted in 3-minute faster administration in cardiac arrest. It was underpowered to show survival, however. Fortunately, the great folks in Salt Lake City is back with a larger bite at the statistical apple. Dr Jarvis discusses the background around what we know about epinephrine in cardiac arrest (briefly, for once), walks us through this new study, and puts it in context of modern clinical practice. </p><p>Citations.</p><p>1. Palatinus HN, Johnson MA, Wang HE, Hoareau GL, Youngquist ST: Early intramuscular adrenaline administration is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2024;August;201:110266.</p><p>2. Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, Quinn T, Nolan JP, Scomparin C, Regan S, Long J, Slowther A, Pocock H, et al.: A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;August 23;379(8):711–21.</p><p>3. Okubo M, Komukai S, Callaway CW, Izawa J: Association of Timing of Epinephrine Administration With Outcomes in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;August 10;4(8):e2120176.</p><p>4. Hubble MW, Tyson C: Impact of Early Vasopressor Administration on Neurological Outcomes after Prolonged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;June;32(3):297–304.</p><p>5.  Pugh AE, Stoecklein HH, Tonna JE, Hoareau GL, Johnson MA, Youngquist ST: Intramuscular adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with faster drug delivery: A feasibility study. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;September;7:100142.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/69292fac/28c8a7c9.mp3" length="16632905" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/d5fLWWcX686ftIgY0FtURoY5P4RFwMQVo2BwrRmsVzc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jODRh/Y2QyOGU0NzFmMmVi/MTNiZDRhNjNmMDc5/ZDgxZS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1170</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in episode 80 we discussed a feasibility study out of Salt Lake City that showed IM epi resulted in 3-minute faster administration in cardiac arrest. It was underpowered to show survival, however. Fortunately, the great folks in Salt Lake City is back with a larger bite at the statistical apple. Dr Jarvis discusses the background around what we know about epinephrine in cardiac arrest (briefly, for once), walks us through this new study, and puts it in context of modern clinical practice. </p><p>Citations.</p><p>1. Palatinus HN, Johnson MA, Wang HE, Hoareau GL, Youngquist ST: Early intramuscular adrenaline administration is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2024;August;201:110266.</p><p>2. Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, Quinn T, Nolan JP, Scomparin C, Regan S, Long J, Slowther A, Pocock H, et al.: A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;August 23;379(8):711–21.</p><p>3. Okubo M, Komukai S, Callaway CW, Izawa J: Association of Timing of Epinephrine Administration With Outcomes in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;August 10;4(8):e2120176.</p><p>4. Hubble MW, Tyson C: Impact of Early Vasopressor Administration on Neurological Outcomes after Prolonged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;June;32(3):297–304.</p><p>5.  Pugh AE, Stoecklein HH, Tonna JE, Hoareau GL, Johnson MA, Youngquist ST: Intramuscular adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with faster drug delivery: A feasibility study. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;September;7:100142.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Epinephrine, Cardiac Arrest, Emergency Medicine, Science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/69292fac/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep88 - Naloxone in Cardiac Arrest?</title>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>88</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep88 - Naloxone in Cardiac Arrest?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66877fda-00fd-4121-8ace-2382650a5ea0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/24d0683c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you give naloxone to patients who are in cardiac arrest? Should you? Can it possibly provide any benefit at all once you are already providing effective ventilations? Well, Dr. Jarvis certainly thought not. He might have even thought it out loud. Like, loudly out loud.  </p><p>Based on two recent papers looking directly at this question, perhaps he needs to eat some crow and shine the bright light of science on his own damn practice. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Strong NH, Daya MR, Neth MR, Noble M, Sahni R, Jui J, Lupton JR: The association of early naloxone use with outcomes in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2024;August;201:110263.</p><p>2. Dillon DG, Montoy JCC, Nishijima DK, Niederberger S, Menegazzi JJ, Lacocque J, Rodriguez RM, Wang RC: Naloxone and Patient Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in California. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;August 1;7(8):e2429154.</p><p>3. Niederberger SM, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Menegazzi JJ: Sodium bicarbonate administration is associated with improved survival in asystolic and PEA Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.007">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.007</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>4. Wampler DA: Naloxone in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—More Than </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you give naloxone to patients who are in cardiac arrest? Should you? Can it possibly provide any benefit at all once you are already providing effective ventilations? Well, Dr. Jarvis certainly thought not. He might have even thought it out loud. Like, loudly out loud.  </p><p>Based on two recent papers looking directly at this question, perhaps he needs to eat some crow and shine the bright light of science on his own damn practice. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Strong NH, Daya MR, Neth MR, Noble M, Sahni R, Jui J, Lupton JR: The association of early naloxone use with outcomes in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2024;August;201:110263.</p><p>2. Dillon DG, Montoy JCC, Nishijima DK, Niederberger S, Menegazzi JJ, Lacocque J, Rodriguez RM, Wang RC: Naloxone and Patient Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in California. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;August 1;7(8):e2429154.</p><p>3. Niederberger SM, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Menegazzi JJ: Sodium bicarbonate administration is associated with improved survival in asystolic and PEA Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.007">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.007</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>4. Wampler DA: Naloxone in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—More Than </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 23:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/24d0683c/63f908b6.mp3" length="26041827" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/WavjIKDbCYylHP5PfY1A6X8S8aZoeZiYyNYEn7-oM_I/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xYjQ3/MWVlNzVlZWQxMzkz/OGZlM2MzYWJjNzZk/NGUxYS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1842</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you give naloxone to patients who are in cardiac arrest? Should you? Can it possibly provide any benefit at all once you are already providing effective ventilations? Well, Dr. Jarvis certainly thought not. He might have even thought it out loud. Like, loudly out loud.  </p><p>Based on two recent papers looking directly at this question, perhaps he needs to eat some crow and shine the bright light of science on his own damn practice. </p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Strong NH, Daya MR, Neth MR, Noble M, Sahni R, Jui J, Lupton JR: The association of early naloxone use with outcomes in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2024;August;201:110263.</p><p>2. Dillon DG, Montoy JCC, Nishijima DK, Niederberger S, Menegazzi JJ, Lacocque J, Rodriguez RM, Wang RC: Naloxone and Patient Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in California. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;August 1;7(8):e2429154.</p><p>3. Niederberger SM, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Menegazzi JJ: Sodium bicarbonate administration is associated with improved survival in asystolic and PEA Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.007">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.007</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>4. Wampler DA: Naloxone in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—More Than </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Cardiac Arrest, Naloxone, Science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/24d0683c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep87 - Those CPR Pauses, Though...</title>
      <itunes:episode>87</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>87</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep87 - Those CPR Pauses, Though...</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e48ed331-35a9-41ad-84d8-950f9f529b6f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/80c97c39</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember when we learned interruptions in compressions take a long time to recover blood pressure from? And how, to avoid these, we should do continuous compressions to avoid them. And ventilations aren’t all that important. Right? Right? Well, about that. Maybe the stories of the importance of continuous compressions were greatly exaggerated. Join Dr. Jarvis as he discusses the literature that led us to this point and some evidence that has led him to reconsider how his system approaches cardiac arrest. He’ll eventually get around to discussion a recent paper by Dr. Rose Yin that analyzes arterial pressures during cardiac arrest that was a catalyst for him to make changes in his arrest protocols. </p><p><strong>Citations:<br></strong><br></p><p>1. Yin RT, Berve PO, Skaalhegg T, et al. Recovery of arterial blood pressure after chest compression pauses in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 2024;201:110311. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110311">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110311</a></p><p> </p><p>2. Azcarate I, Urigüen JA, Leturiondo M, et al. The Role of Chest Compressions on Ventilation during Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. <em>JCM</em>. 2023;12(21):6918. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216918">10.3390/jcm12216918<br></a><br></p><p>3. Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse Hemodynamic Effects of Interrupting Chest Compressions for Rescue Breathing During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest. <em>Circulation</em>. 2001;104(20):2465-2470. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4501.098926">10.1161/hc4501.098926<br></a><br></p><p>4.Kern KB, Hilwig RonaldW, Berg RA, Ewy GA. Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 1998;39(3):179-188. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00141-5">10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00141-5<br></a><br></p><p>5. Bobrow BJ, Clark LL, Ewy GA, et al. Minimally Interrupted Cardiac Resuscitation by Emergency Medical Services for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. <em>JAMA</em>. 2008;299(10):1158-1165.</p><p>6. Idris AH, Aramendi Ecenarro E, Leroux B, et al. Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study. <em>Circulation</em>. 2023;148(23):1847-1856. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561">10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561<br></a><br></p><p>7. Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H, et al. Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR. <em>N Engl J Med</em>. 2015;373(23):2203-2214. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1509139">10.1056/NEJMoa1509139</a></p><p> </p><p>8. Schmicker RH, Nichol G, Kudenchuk P, et al. CPR compression strategy 30:2 is difficult to adhere to, but has better survival than continuous chest compressions when done correctly. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 2021;165:31-37. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027</a></p><p> </p><p>9. Zhan L, Yang LJ, Huang Y, He Q, Liu GJ. Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Anaesthesia C and ECG, ed. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</em>. Published online 2017. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010134.pub2">10.1002/14651858.cd010134.pub2</a></p><p> </p><p>10. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al. Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. <em>Circulation</em>. 2004;109(16):1960-1965. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61">10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61<br></a><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember when we learned interruptions in compressions take a long time to recover blood pressure from? And how, to avoid these, we should do continuous compressions to avoid them. And ventilations aren’t all that important. Right? Right? Well, about that. Maybe the stories of the importance of continuous compressions were greatly exaggerated. Join Dr. Jarvis as he discusses the literature that led us to this point and some evidence that has led him to reconsider how his system approaches cardiac arrest. He’ll eventually get around to discussion a recent paper by Dr. Rose Yin that analyzes arterial pressures during cardiac arrest that was a catalyst for him to make changes in his arrest protocols. </p><p><strong>Citations:<br></strong><br></p><p>1. Yin RT, Berve PO, Skaalhegg T, et al. Recovery of arterial blood pressure after chest compression pauses in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 2024;201:110311. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110311">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110311</a></p><p> </p><p>2. Azcarate I, Urigüen JA, Leturiondo M, et al. The Role of Chest Compressions on Ventilation during Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. <em>JCM</em>. 2023;12(21):6918. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216918">10.3390/jcm12216918<br></a><br></p><p>3. Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse Hemodynamic Effects of Interrupting Chest Compressions for Rescue Breathing During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest. <em>Circulation</em>. 2001;104(20):2465-2470. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4501.098926">10.1161/hc4501.098926<br></a><br></p><p>4.Kern KB, Hilwig RonaldW, Berg RA, Ewy GA. Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 1998;39(3):179-188. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00141-5">10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00141-5<br></a><br></p><p>5. Bobrow BJ, Clark LL, Ewy GA, et al. Minimally Interrupted Cardiac Resuscitation by Emergency Medical Services for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. <em>JAMA</em>. 2008;299(10):1158-1165.</p><p>6. Idris AH, Aramendi Ecenarro E, Leroux B, et al. Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study. <em>Circulation</em>. 2023;148(23):1847-1856. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561">10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561<br></a><br></p><p>7. Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H, et al. Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR. <em>N Engl J Med</em>. 2015;373(23):2203-2214. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1509139">10.1056/NEJMoa1509139</a></p><p> </p><p>8. Schmicker RH, Nichol G, Kudenchuk P, et al. CPR compression strategy 30:2 is difficult to adhere to, but has better survival than continuous chest compressions when done correctly. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 2021;165:31-37. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027</a></p><p> </p><p>9. Zhan L, Yang LJ, Huang Y, He Q, Liu GJ. Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Anaesthesia C and ECG, ed. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</em>. Published online 2017. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010134.pub2">10.1002/14651858.cd010134.pub2</a></p><p> </p><p>10. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al. Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. <em>Circulation</em>. 2004;109(16):1960-1965. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61">10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61<br></a><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/80c97c39/ec762471.mp3" length="22405658" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/76SOiy2DLUw95dH1WNqNhjjQASDY_EApQ2UL-oNIAUE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8zZjdm/ZmNkYjQyZDE5Yjgy/YmZmOTI4OTZkOTFh/ZmQxNS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1582</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember when we learned interruptions in compressions take a long time to recover blood pressure from? And how, to avoid these, we should do continuous compressions to avoid them. And ventilations aren’t all that important. Right? Right? Well, about that. Maybe the stories of the importance of continuous compressions were greatly exaggerated. Join Dr. Jarvis as he discusses the literature that led us to this point and some evidence that has led him to reconsider how his system approaches cardiac arrest. He’ll eventually get around to discussion a recent paper by Dr. Rose Yin that analyzes arterial pressures during cardiac arrest that was a catalyst for him to make changes in his arrest protocols. </p><p><strong>Citations:<br></strong><br></p><p>1. Yin RT, Berve PO, Skaalhegg T, et al. Recovery of arterial blood pressure after chest compression pauses in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 2024;201:110311. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110311">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110311</a></p><p> </p><p>2. Azcarate I, Urigüen JA, Leturiondo M, et al. The Role of Chest Compressions on Ventilation during Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. <em>JCM</em>. 2023;12(21):6918. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216918">10.3390/jcm12216918<br></a><br></p><p>3. Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse Hemodynamic Effects of Interrupting Chest Compressions for Rescue Breathing During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest. <em>Circulation</em>. 2001;104(20):2465-2470. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4501.098926">10.1161/hc4501.098926<br></a><br></p><p>4.Kern KB, Hilwig RonaldW, Berg RA, Ewy GA. Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 1998;39(3):179-188. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00141-5">10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00141-5<br></a><br></p><p>5. Bobrow BJ, Clark LL, Ewy GA, et al. Minimally Interrupted Cardiac Resuscitation by Emergency Medical Services for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. <em>JAMA</em>. 2008;299(10):1158-1165.</p><p>6. Idris AH, Aramendi Ecenarro E, Leroux B, et al. Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study. <em>Circulation</em>. 2023;148(23):1847-1856. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561">10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561<br></a><br></p><p>7. Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H, et al. Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR. <em>N Engl J Med</em>. 2015;373(23):2203-2214. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1509139">10.1056/NEJMoa1509139</a></p><p> </p><p>8. Schmicker RH, Nichol G, Kudenchuk P, et al. CPR compression strategy 30:2 is difficult to adhere to, but has better survival than continuous chest compressions when done correctly. <em>Resuscitation</em>. 2021;165:31-37. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027</a></p><p> </p><p>9. Zhan L, Yang LJ, Huang Y, He Q, Liu GJ. Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Anaesthesia C and ECG, ed. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</em>. Published online 2017. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010134.pub2">10.1002/14651858.cd010134.pub2</a></p><p> </p><p>10. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al. Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. <em>Circulation</em>. 2004;109(16):1960-1965. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61">10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61<br></a><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Literature, Science, Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitation, CPR</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep86 - The PREOXI Trial</title>
      <itunes:episode>86</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>86</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep86 - The PREOXI Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41234906-08b9-434b-a421-d18a63429bc3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ae9bd9b2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What’s the best way to pre-oxygenate our patients prior to intubation? The evidence for this question has been mixed for some time. Dr Jarvis discusses the PREOXI Trial, which directly compares preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation compared to a face mask to see which provides the best protection against peri-intubation hypoxia. This is an important trial that sheds light on a key component of our bundle of care to make intubation safer.</p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><ol><li>Gibbs KW, Semler MW, Driver BE, Seitz KP, Stempek SB, Taylor C, Resnick-Ault D, White HD, Gandotra S, Doerschug KC, et al.: Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation. N Engl J Med. (2024)</li><li>Jarvis JL, Gonzales J, Johns D, Sager L: Implementation of a Clinical Bundle to Reduce Out-of-Hospital Peri-intubation Hypoxia. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018;72:272–9.</li><li>Groombridge C, et al: A prospective, randomised trial of pre-oxygenation strategies available in the pre-hospital environment. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:580–4.</li><li>Groombridge C, et al: Assessment of Common Preoxygenation Strategies Outside of the Operating Room Environment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;March;23(3):342–6.</li><li>Baillard C, et al: Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;July 15;174(2):171–7.</li><li>Ramkumar V, et al: Preoxygenation with 20-degree head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth. 2011;25:189–94.</li><li>Pourmand A, et al: Pre-oxygenation: Implications in emergency airway management. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.006">10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.006</a></li><li>Solis A, Baillard C: Effectiveness of preoxygenation using the head-up position and noninvasive ventilation to reduce hypoxaemia during intubation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;June;27(6):490–4.</li><li>April MD, Arana A, Reynolds JC, Carlson JN, Davis WT, Schauer SG, Oliver JJ, Summers SM, Long B, Walls RM, et al.: Peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study. Resuscitation. 2021;May;162:403–11.</li><li>Trent SA, Driver BE, Prekker ME, Barnes CR, Brewer JM, Doerschug KC, Gaillard JP, Gibbs KW, Ghamande S, Hughes CG, et al.: Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt</li><li>Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023;82(4):S0196064423002135.</li><li>Pavlov I, Medrano S, Weingart S: Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJEM. 2017;35(8):1184–9.</li></ol><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What’s the best way to pre-oxygenate our patients prior to intubation? The evidence for this question has been mixed for some time. Dr Jarvis discusses the PREOXI Trial, which directly compares preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation compared to a face mask to see which provides the best protection against peri-intubation hypoxia. This is an important trial that sheds light on a key component of our bundle of care to make intubation safer.</p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><ol><li>Gibbs KW, Semler MW, Driver BE, Seitz KP, Stempek SB, Taylor C, Resnick-Ault D, White HD, Gandotra S, Doerschug KC, et al.: Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation. N Engl J Med. (2024)</li><li>Jarvis JL, Gonzales J, Johns D, Sager L: Implementation of a Clinical Bundle to Reduce Out-of-Hospital Peri-intubation Hypoxia. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018;72:272–9.</li><li>Groombridge C, et al: A prospective, randomised trial of pre-oxygenation strategies available in the pre-hospital environment. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:580–4.</li><li>Groombridge C, et al: Assessment of Common Preoxygenation Strategies Outside of the Operating Room Environment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;March;23(3):342–6.</li><li>Baillard C, et al: Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;July 15;174(2):171–7.</li><li>Ramkumar V, et al: Preoxygenation with 20-degree head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth. 2011;25:189–94.</li><li>Pourmand A, et al: Pre-oxygenation: Implications in emergency airway management. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.006">10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.006</a></li><li>Solis A, Baillard C: Effectiveness of preoxygenation using the head-up position and noninvasive ventilation to reduce hypoxaemia during intubation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;June;27(6):490–4.</li><li>April MD, Arana A, Reynolds JC, Carlson JN, Davis WT, Schauer SG, Oliver JJ, Summers SM, Long B, Walls RM, et al.: Peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study. Resuscitation. 2021;May;162:403–11.</li><li>Trent SA, Driver BE, Prekker ME, Barnes CR, Brewer JM, Doerschug KC, Gaillard JP, Gibbs KW, Ghamande S, Hughes CG, et al.: Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt</li><li>Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023;82(4):S0196064423002135.</li><li>Pavlov I, Medrano S, Weingart S: Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJEM. 2017;35(8):1184–9.</li></ol><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/ae9bd9b2/a5b3b337.mp3" length="24857735" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/W_h0jHx-9IowwQMFGKtsRIqdrnpJ_n5u_QW0ttYhzF0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mNGVi/NjZjYzY2MDU2ZGEz/YjM4YTFhNTgzMGIy/YmJmYS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1757</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>What’s the best way to pre-oxygenate our patients prior to intubation? The evidence for this question has been mixed for some time. Dr Jarvis discusses the PREOXI Trial, which directly compares preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation compared to a face mask to see which provides the best protection against peri-intubation hypoxia. This is an important trial that sheds light on a key component of our bundle of care to make intubation safer.</p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><ol><li>Gibbs KW, Semler MW, Driver BE, Seitz KP, Stempek SB, Taylor C, Resnick-Ault D, White HD, Gandotra S, Doerschug KC, et al.: Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation. N Engl J Med. (2024)</li><li>Jarvis JL, Gonzales J, Johns D, Sager L: Implementation of a Clinical Bundle to Reduce Out-of-Hospital Peri-intubation Hypoxia. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018;72:272–9.</li><li>Groombridge C, et al: A prospective, randomised trial of pre-oxygenation strategies available in the pre-hospital environment. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:580–4.</li><li>Groombridge C, et al: Assessment of Common Preoxygenation Strategies Outside of the Operating Room Environment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;March;23(3):342–6.</li><li>Baillard C, et al: Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;July 15;174(2):171–7.</li><li>Ramkumar V, et al: Preoxygenation with 20-degree head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth. 2011;25:189–94.</li><li>Pourmand A, et al: Pre-oxygenation: Implications in emergency airway management. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.006">10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.006</a></li><li>Solis A, Baillard C: Effectiveness of preoxygenation using the head-up position and noninvasive ventilation to reduce hypoxaemia during intubation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;June;27(6):490–4.</li><li>April MD, Arana A, Reynolds JC, Carlson JN, Davis WT, Schauer SG, Oliver JJ, Summers SM, Long B, Walls RM, et al.: Peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study. Resuscitation. 2021;May;162:403–11.</li><li>Trent SA, Driver BE, Prekker ME, Barnes CR, Brewer JM, Doerschug KC, Gaillard JP, Gibbs KW, Ghamande S, Hughes CG, et al.: Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt</li><li>Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023;82(4):S0196064423002135.</li><li>Pavlov I, Medrano S, Weingart S: Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJEM. 2017;35(8):1184–9.</li></ol><p><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Medicine, Intubation, Pre-Oxygenation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep85 - Intubation: Is More Better?</title>
      <itunes:episode>85</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>85</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep85 - Intubation: Is More Better?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65e23975-684d-49e1-804a-27fec00ca143</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0c367a35</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>There is evidence that clinician experience with intubation is associated with improved success rates and evidence that missed intubation attempts are associated with worse survival, at least in cardiac arrest. The recent Airway EBG paper recommends EMS agencies with low intubation proficiency should use SGAs instead of intubation in cardiac arrest. This all begs the question of whether agencies who intubate more often have higher success rates than those who do not. That’s precisely the question a new paper from Annals of Emergency Medicine attempts to answer. Join Dr. Jarvis to discuss the paper and his thoughts on integrating its findings into practice.</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Jarvis JL, Panchal AR, Lyng JW, Bosson N, Donofrio-Odmann JJ, Braude DA, Browne LR, Arinder M, Bolleter S, Gross T, et al.: Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;28(4):545–57.</p><p>2. Murphy DL, Bulger NE, Harrington BM, Skerchak JA, Counts CR, Latimer AJ, Yang BY, Maynard C, Rea TD, Sayre MR: Fewer Tracheal Intubation Attempts are Associated with Improved Neurologically Intact Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation. 2021;July 13;167(Oct 2021):289–96.</p><p>3. Crewdson K, Lockey DJ, Røislien J, Lossius HM, Rehn M: The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;December;21(1):31.</p><p>4. Thomas J, Crowe R, Schulz K, Wang HE, De Oliveira Otto MC, Karfunkle B, Boerwinkle E, Huebinger R: Association Between Emergency Medical Service Agency Intubation Rate and Intubation Success. Ann Emerg Med. Published online: January 2024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.005">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.005</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>5. Carlson JN, De Lorenzo R: Does Practice Make Perfect, or Is There More to Consider? Ann Emerg Med. Published online: January 2024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.019">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.019</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There is evidence that clinician experience with intubation is associated with improved success rates and evidence that missed intubation attempts are associated with worse survival, at least in cardiac arrest. The recent Airway EBG paper recommends EMS agencies with low intubation proficiency should use SGAs instead of intubation in cardiac arrest. This all begs the question of whether agencies who intubate more often have higher success rates than those who do not. That’s precisely the question a new paper from Annals of Emergency Medicine attempts to answer. Join Dr. Jarvis to discuss the paper and his thoughts on integrating its findings into practice.</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Jarvis JL, Panchal AR, Lyng JW, Bosson N, Donofrio-Odmann JJ, Braude DA, Browne LR, Arinder M, Bolleter S, Gross T, et al.: Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;28(4):545–57.</p><p>2. Murphy DL, Bulger NE, Harrington BM, Skerchak JA, Counts CR, Latimer AJ, Yang BY, Maynard C, Rea TD, Sayre MR: Fewer Tracheal Intubation Attempts are Associated with Improved Neurologically Intact Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation. 2021;July 13;167(Oct 2021):289–96.</p><p>3. Crewdson K, Lockey DJ, Røislien J, Lossius HM, Rehn M: The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;December;21(1):31.</p><p>4. Thomas J, Crowe R, Schulz K, Wang HE, De Oliveira Otto MC, Karfunkle B, Boerwinkle E, Huebinger R: Association Between Emergency Medical Service Agency Intubation Rate and Intubation Success. Ann Emerg Med. Published online: January 2024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.005">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.005</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>5. Carlson JN, De Lorenzo R: Does Practice Make Perfect, or Is There More to Consider? Ann Emerg Med. Published online: January 2024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.019">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.019</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/0c367a35/dde82451.mp3" length="17492473" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/zK7Pu-eQ0TWGJ_kXMXkga9s0eH9JOJCUSJ3fBrntSI0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mMzYy/Mjk0NDE2ZDAwYWYy/YzAyZjYwM2EzMGI4/MDM0MC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1232</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>There is evidence that clinician experience with intubation is associated with improved success rates and evidence that missed intubation attempts are associated with worse survival, at least in cardiac arrest. The recent Airway EBG paper recommends EMS agencies with low intubation proficiency should use SGAs instead of intubation in cardiac arrest. This all begs the question of whether agencies who intubate more often have higher success rates than those who do not. That’s precisely the question a new paper from Annals of Emergency Medicine attempts to answer. Join Dr. Jarvis to discuss the paper and his thoughts on integrating its findings into practice.</p><p>Citations:</p><p>1. Jarvis JL, Panchal AR, Lyng JW, Bosson N, Donofrio-Odmann JJ, Braude DA, Browne LR, Arinder M, Bolleter S, Gross T, et al.: Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;28(4):545–57.</p><p>2. Murphy DL, Bulger NE, Harrington BM, Skerchak JA, Counts CR, Latimer AJ, Yang BY, Maynard C, Rea TD, Sayre MR: Fewer Tracheal Intubation Attempts are Associated with Improved Neurologically Intact Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation. 2021;July 13;167(Oct 2021):289–96.</p><p>3. Crewdson K, Lockey DJ, Røislien J, Lossius HM, Rehn M: The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;December;21(1):31.</p><p>4. Thomas J, Crowe R, Schulz K, Wang HE, De Oliveira Otto MC, Karfunkle B, Boerwinkle E, Huebinger R: Association Between Emergency Medical Service Agency Intubation Rate and Intubation Success. Ann Emerg Med. Published online: January 2024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.005">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.005</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p><p>5. Carlson JN, De Lorenzo R: Does Practice Make Perfect, or Is There More to Consider? Ann Emerg Med. Published online: January 2024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.019">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.019</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Medicine, Intubation, Airway Management, Science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep84 - Nebulized Ketamine?</title>
      <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>84</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep84 - Nebulized Ketamine?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e44af7c-3740-4872-929f-61dea300e389</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e86136d1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Description: </strong></p><p>Let’s say you were looking for a safe and effective BLS option for analgesia. Something other than oral acetaminophen or ibuprofen. You want the Green Whistle (methoxyflurane), but you can’t get the Green Whistle (thanks, FDA!). How about sub-dissociative ketamine by nebulizer? Sounds great, but you’re worried about your colleagues getting stoned, right? Admit it, you are. Fortunately, there are breath-actuated nebulizers. Maybe those things will work?</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper comparing the effectiveness of nebulized ketamine with IV ketamine and gives a quick review of some other papers that paved the way for this one.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><p>1. Nguyen T, Mai M, Choudhary A, Gitelman S, Drapkin J, Likourezos A, Kabariti S, Hossain R, Kun K, Gohel A, et al.: Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine to Intravenous Subdissociative Dose Ketamine for Treating Acute Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Controlled Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. (2024) May 2.</p><p>2. Motov S, Mai M, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, Drapkin J, Yasavolian M, Brady J, Homel P, Fromm C: A prospective randomized, double-dummy trial comparing IV push low dose ketamine to short infusion of low dose ketamine for treatment of pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;August;35(8):1095–100.</p><p>3. Motov S, Rockoff B, Cohen V, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, McKay C, Soleyman-Zomalan E, Homel P, Terentiev V, Fromm C: Intravenous Subdissociative-Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;September;66(3):222-229.e1.</p><p>4. Motov S, Yasavolian M, Likourezos A, Pushkar I, Hossain R, Drapkin J, Cohen V, Filk N, Smith A, Huang F, et al.: Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;August;70(2):177–84.</p><p>5.Dove D, Fassassi C, Davis A, Drapkin J, Butt M, Hossain R, Kabariti S, Likourezos A, Gohel A, Favale P, et al.: Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine at Three Different Dosing Regimens for Treating Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021;December;78(6):779–87.</p><p>6.Patrick C, Smith M, Rafique Z, Rogers Keene K, De La Rosa X: Nebulized Ketamine for Analgesia in the Prehospital Setting: A Case Series. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;February 17;27(2):269–74.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Description: </strong></p><p>Let’s say you were looking for a safe and effective BLS option for analgesia. Something other than oral acetaminophen or ibuprofen. You want the Green Whistle (methoxyflurane), but you can’t get the Green Whistle (thanks, FDA!). How about sub-dissociative ketamine by nebulizer? Sounds great, but you’re worried about your colleagues getting stoned, right? Admit it, you are. Fortunately, there are breath-actuated nebulizers. Maybe those things will work?</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper comparing the effectiveness of nebulized ketamine with IV ketamine and gives a quick review of some other papers that paved the way for this one.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><p>1. Nguyen T, Mai M, Choudhary A, Gitelman S, Drapkin J, Likourezos A, Kabariti S, Hossain R, Kun K, Gohel A, et al.: Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine to Intravenous Subdissociative Dose Ketamine for Treating Acute Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Controlled Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. (2024) May 2.</p><p>2. Motov S, Mai M, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, Drapkin J, Yasavolian M, Brady J, Homel P, Fromm C: A prospective randomized, double-dummy trial comparing IV push low dose ketamine to short infusion of low dose ketamine for treatment of pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;August;35(8):1095–100.</p><p>3. Motov S, Rockoff B, Cohen V, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, McKay C, Soleyman-Zomalan E, Homel P, Terentiev V, Fromm C: Intravenous Subdissociative-Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;September;66(3):222-229.e1.</p><p>4. Motov S, Yasavolian M, Likourezos A, Pushkar I, Hossain R, Drapkin J, Cohen V, Filk N, Smith A, Huang F, et al.: Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;August;70(2):177–84.</p><p>5.Dove D, Fassassi C, Davis A, Drapkin J, Butt M, Hossain R, Kabariti S, Likourezos A, Gohel A, Favale P, et al.: Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine at Three Different Dosing Regimens for Treating Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021;December;78(6):779–87.</p><p>6.Patrick C, Smith M, Rafique Z, Rogers Keene K, De La Rosa X: Nebulized Ketamine for Analgesia in the Prehospital Setting: A Case Series. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;February 17;27(2):269–74.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 01:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMTP</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/e86136d1/e5c3c19f.mp3" length="25415265" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMTP</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/wfjJvk7IwYyP_A-xyKpJkZKHoDh0ZLHEq8e7mAbQ1Rg/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80ZWNh/OGQzMTA3OTljNWQw/MjUwODhjYWNiYWRi/YjUwYy5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1797</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Description: </strong></p><p>Let’s say you were looking for a safe and effective BLS option for analgesia. Something other than oral acetaminophen or ibuprofen. You want the Green Whistle (methoxyflurane), but you can’t get the Green Whistle (thanks, FDA!). How about sub-dissociative ketamine by nebulizer? Sounds great, but you’re worried about your colleagues getting stoned, right? Admit it, you are. Fortunately, there are breath-actuated nebulizers. Maybe those things will work?</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper comparing the effectiveness of nebulized ketamine with IV ketamine and gives a quick review of some other papers that paved the way for this one.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><p>1. Nguyen T, Mai M, Choudhary A, Gitelman S, Drapkin J, Likourezos A, Kabariti S, Hossain R, Kun K, Gohel A, et al.: Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine to Intravenous Subdissociative Dose Ketamine for Treating Acute Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Controlled Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. (2024) May 2.</p><p>2. Motov S, Mai M, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, Drapkin J, Yasavolian M, Brady J, Homel P, Fromm C: A prospective randomized, double-dummy trial comparing IV push low dose ketamine to short infusion of low dose ketamine for treatment of pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;August;35(8):1095–100.</p><p>3. Motov S, Rockoff B, Cohen V, Pushkar I, Likourezos A, McKay C, Soleyman-Zomalan E, Homel P, Terentiev V, Fromm C: Intravenous Subdissociative-Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;September;66(3):222-229.e1.</p><p>4. Motov S, Yasavolian M, Likourezos A, Pushkar I, Hossain R, Drapkin J, Cohen V, Filk N, Smith A, Huang F, et al.: Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;August;70(2):177–84.</p><p>5.Dove D, Fassassi C, Davis A, Drapkin J, Butt M, Hossain R, Kabariti S, Likourezos A, Gohel A, Favale P, et al.: Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine at Three Different Dosing Regimens for Treating Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021;December;78(6):779–87.</p><p>6.Patrick C, Smith M, Rafique Z, Rogers Keene K, De La Rosa X: Nebulized Ketamine for Analgesia in the Prehospital Setting: A Case Series. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023;February 17;27(2):269–74.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Emergency Medicine, Analgesia, Ketamine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e86136d1/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 83 - EtCO2 in Cardiac Arrest</title>
      <itunes:episode>83</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>83</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 83 - EtCO2 in Cardiac Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22bc856f-8417-4778-a167-aa6ad1212a5d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4685ca69</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What value does EtCO2 have when predicting survival from cardiac arrest? We all know a sharp spike in EtCO2 is associated with ROSC, but what about persistently elevated levels? What does this mean for decision-making regarding the termination of resuscitation?</p><p> </p><p>Join Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Remle Crowe, and Heidi Abraham for the first episode of “Between Two Nerds,” a subgenre of the EMS Lighthouse Project podcast suggested in episode 82 by Dr. CJ Winckler, as they run through a new paper that may shed some light on this question.</p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p>1. Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B: The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;April 2;28(3):478–84.</p><p>2. Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller C: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:301–6.</p><p>3. Page, J. <em>The Magic of 3 AM</em>. PennWell Books. Tulsa, OK. 2017</p><p> </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What value does EtCO2 have when predicting survival from cardiac arrest? We all know a sharp spike in EtCO2 is associated with ROSC, but what about persistently elevated levels? What does this mean for decision-making regarding the termination of resuscitation?</p><p> </p><p>Join Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Remle Crowe, and Heidi Abraham for the first episode of “Between Two Nerds,” a subgenre of the EMS Lighthouse Project podcast suggested in episode 82 by Dr. CJ Winckler, as they run through a new paper that may shed some light on this question.</p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p>1. Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B: The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;April 2;28(3):478–84.</p><p>2. Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller C: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:301–6.</p><p>3. Page, J. <em>The Magic of 3 AM</em>. PennWell Books. Tulsa, OK. 2017</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4685ca69/0fb7dcd0.mp3" length="28806968" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/8dZDi2f87fIdKhReDKdEcxxnmQUIMhjs3T37m7TA2zM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yOGZm/ZGZjNTlmNjY0MjBi/ZTAwYmFjM2VkN2I5/Mjk2OC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2039</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>What value does EtCO2 have when predicting survival from cardiac arrest? We all know a sharp spike in EtCO2 is associated with ROSC, but what about persistently elevated levels? What does this mean for decision-making regarding the termination of resuscitation?</p><p> </p><p>Join Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Remle Crowe, and Heidi Abraham for the first episode of “Between Two Nerds,” a subgenre of the EMS Lighthouse Project podcast suggested in episode 82 by Dr. CJ Winckler, as they run through a new paper that may shed some light on this question.</p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p>1. Smida T, Menegazzi JJ, Crowe RP, Salcido DD, Bardes J, Myers B: The Association of Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2024;April 2;28(3):478–84.</p><p>2. Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller C: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:301–6.</p><p>3. Page, J. <em>The Magic of 3 AM</em>. PennWell Books. Tulsa, OK. 2017</p><p> </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Medicine, Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitation, EtCO2</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E82 - Ketamine v Etomidate for RSI: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis</title>
      <itunes:episode>82</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>82</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E82 - Ketamine v Etomidate for RSI: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a5f1b66-7a8c-4256-9dcf-b270faca6ad5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0112ac55</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debate about which drug to use for sedation before RSI will... not… die. Advocates for both ketamine and etomidate approach the argument with near-religious zeal. There have been studies. We’ve even covered some here. We need a systematic review and meta-analysis, preferably using an analysis that recognizes this likely isn’t a black-and-white question. That’s where our friend Bayes comes in. Dr. Jarvis is joined by Drs Remle Crowe and CJ Winkler to discuss this paper and what in the hell Bayesian analysis actually is. We get some nice book recommendations in the process. Plus, we check in with ChatGPT for answers.</p><p>Oh, BTW... don't take zoological advice from Dr. Winkler. Contrary to his thoughts, Giraffe's do NOT, in fact, have larger hearts than elephants. </p><p>Citations:<br>1. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, Shibata T, Fujii M, Fresilli S, Tonai M, Karumai T, Lee TC, Landoni G, Hayashi Y. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024 Feb 17;28(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04831-4. PMID: 38368326; PMCID: PMC10874027.<br>2. Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, et al. Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries. JAMA. 2021;325(12):1164-1172.</p><p>Bonus book recommendations<br>3. Heller J. Catch-22. New York, NY: Simon &amp; Schuster; 1961.<br>4. McGrayne SB. The Theory That Would Not Die. How Bayes’ Rule Cracked The Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines &amp; Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. Yale University Press; 2011.<br>5. Salsburg D. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science In The Twentieth Century. Henry Holt &amp; Company; 2001.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debate about which drug to use for sedation before RSI will... not… die. Advocates for both ketamine and etomidate approach the argument with near-religious zeal. There have been studies. We’ve even covered some here. We need a systematic review and meta-analysis, preferably using an analysis that recognizes this likely isn’t a black-and-white question. That’s where our friend Bayes comes in. Dr. Jarvis is joined by Drs Remle Crowe and CJ Winkler to discuss this paper and what in the hell Bayesian analysis actually is. We get some nice book recommendations in the process. Plus, we check in with ChatGPT for answers.</p><p>Oh, BTW... don't take zoological advice from Dr. Winkler. Contrary to his thoughts, Giraffe's do NOT, in fact, have larger hearts than elephants. </p><p>Citations:<br>1. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, Shibata T, Fujii M, Fresilli S, Tonai M, Karumai T, Lee TC, Landoni G, Hayashi Y. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024 Feb 17;28(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04831-4. PMID: 38368326; PMCID: PMC10874027.<br>2. Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, et al. Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries. JAMA. 2021;325(12):1164-1172.</p><p>Bonus book recommendations<br>3. Heller J. Catch-22. New York, NY: Simon &amp; Schuster; 1961.<br>4. McGrayne SB. The Theory That Would Not Die. How Bayes’ Rule Cracked The Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines &amp; Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. Yale University Press; 2011.<br>5. Salsburg D. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science In The Twentieth Century. Henry Holt &amp; Company; 2001.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/0112ac55/0a1d3d82.mp3" length="38911519" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD, MS, EMT-P</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/e1okLi4nCSWWcQLFcxdeqk7cnVx31CbqTNTqW4FxwVk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE4MjYzMTkv/MTcxMjAxMTMwNy1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2759</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debate about which drug to use for sedation before RSI will... not… die. Advocates for both ketamine and etomidate approach the argument with near-religious zeal. There have been studies. We’ve even covered some here. We need a systematic review and meta-analysis, preferably using an analysis that recognizes this likely isn’t a black-and-white question. That’s where our friend Bayes comes in. Dr. Jarvis is joined by Drs Remle Crowe and CJ Winkler to discuss this paper and what in the hell Bayesian analysis actually is. We get some nice book recommendations in the process. Plus, we check in with ChatGPT for answers.</p><p>Oh, BTW... don't take zoological advice from Dr. Winkler. Contrary to his thoughts, Giraffe's do NOT, in fact, have larger hearts than elephants. </p><p>Citations:<br>1. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, Shibata T, Fujii M, Fresilli S, Tonai M, Karumai T, Lee TC, Landoni G, Hayashi Y. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024 Feb 17;28(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04831-4. PMID: 38368326; PMCID: PMC10874027.<br>2. Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, et al. Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries. JAMA. 2021;325(12):1164-1172.</p><p>Bonus book recommendations<br>3. Heller J. Catch-22. New York, NY: Simon &amp; Schuster; 1961.<br>4. McGrayne SB. The Theory That Would Not Die. How Bayes’ Rule Cracked The Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines &amp; Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. Yale University Press; 2011.<br>5. Salsburg D. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science In The Twentieth Century. Henry Holt &amp; Company; 2001.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Intubation, Ketamine, Etomidate, Bayesian Analysis, Research</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep81 - Treatment of Atrial Fib with RVR</title>
      <itunes:episode>81</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>81</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep81 - Treatment of Atrial Fib with RVR</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">056931ed-8c0a-461c-be30-353b378f196e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/97acdd48</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Atrial Fibrillation with rapid ventricular response is a common cause of EMS activations and ED visits. It is associated with chest discomfort, palpitations, and hypotension. Treatment is aimed at either rhythm or rate control, with rate control being the most common first-line approach. EMS has the potential to treat this condition with medications such as diltiazem, metoprolol, or amiodarone. For those patients with hemodynamic instability, EMS can provide synchronized cardioversion. However, the question for this podcast is whether it matters if EMS treats A Fib or not. Dr. Jarvis recorded this episode in front of a live audience at the State of Jefferson conference in beautiful Ashland, Oregon, with Mike Verkest and special guest Dr Maia Dorsett. </p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p>Fornage LB, O’Neil C, Dowker SR, Wanta ER, Lewis RS, Brown LH: Prehospital Intervention Improves Outcomes for Patients Presenting in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885">10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Atrial Fibrillation with rapid ventricular response is a common cause of EMS activations and ED visits. It is associated with chest discomfort, palpitations, and hypotension. Treatment is aimed at either rhythm or rate control, with rate control being the most common first-line approach. EMS has the potential to treat this condition with medications such as diltiazem, metoprolol, or amiodarone. For those patients with hemodynamic instability, EMS can provide synchronized cardioversion. However, the question for this podcast is whether it matters if EMS treats A Fib or not. Dr. Jarvis recorded this episode in front of a live audience at the State of Jefferson conference in beautiful Ashland, Oregon, with Mike Verkest and special guest Dr Maia Dorsett. </p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p>Fornage LB, O’Neil C, Dowker SR, Wanta ER, Lewis RS, Brown LH: Prehospital Intervention Improves Outcomes for Patients Presenting in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885">10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 02:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/97acdd48/12ea6e32.mp3" length="41299073" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey L. Jarvis, MD</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/a8o8PNf23q4xa-IenEUf_bNZD7aV1jVoB0dQT0lX06Q/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE3ODM5ODkv/MTcxMDEyNDg5Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2930</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Atrial Fibrillation with rapid ventricular response is a common cause of EMS activations and ED visits. It is associated with chest discomfort, palpitations, and hypotension. Treatment is aimed at either rhythm or rate control, with rate control being the most common first-line approach. EMS has the potential to treat this condition with medications such as diltiazem, metoprolol, or amiodarone. For those patients with hemodynamic instability, EMS can provide synchronized cardioversion. However, the question for this podcast is whether it matters if EMS treats A Fib or not. Dr. Jarvis recorded this episode in front of a live audience at the State of Jefferson conference in beautiful Ashland, Oregon, with Mike Verkest and special guest Dr Maia Dorsett. </p><p> </p><p>Citation:</p><p>Fornage LB, O’Neil C, Dowker SR, Wanta ER, Lewis RS, Brown LH: Prehospital Intervention Improves Outcomes for Patients Presenting in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885">10.1080/10903127.2023.2283885</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>EMS, Medicine, Atrial Fibrillation, AFib, Science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/97acdd48/transcription.vtt" type="text/vtt" rel="captions"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/97acdd48/transcription.srt" type="application/x-subrip" rel="captions"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/97acdd48/transcription.json" type="application/json" rel="captions"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/97acdd48/transcription.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/97acdd48/transcription" type="text/html"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP E80 – IM Epi in Cardiac Arrest</title>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>80</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP E80 – IM Epi in Cardiac Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92be53ec-64cf-4264-81e7-03c9a422dabf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9407efc9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis is joined by OG co-host Mike Verkest and Dr. Brent Myers from NAEMSP 2024. We discuss an intriguing concept in cardiac arrest… giving the initial dose of epinephrine IM instead of starting an IV or IO. They discuss a 2021 paper that compared this approach to standard dosing in a feasibility study done in Salt Lake City. Those authors released some additional data from this study… this time about survival. We talk about the potential ramifications.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><p>Pugh AE, Stoecklein HH, Tonna JE, Hoareau GL, Johnson MA, Youngquist ST: Intramuscular adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with faster drug delivery: A feasibility study. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;September;7:100142.</p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis is joined by OG co-host Mike Verkest and Dr. Brent Myers from NAEMSP 2024. We discuss an intriguing concept in cardiac arrest… giving the initial dose of epinephrine IM instead of starting an IV or IO. They discuss a 2021 paper that compared this approach to standard dosing in a feasibility study done in Salt Lake City. Those authors released some additional data from this study… this time about survival. We talk about the potential ramifications.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><p>Pugh AE, Stoecklein HH, Tonna JE, Hoareau GL, Johnson MA, Youngquist ST: Intramuscular adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with faster drug delivery: A feasibility study. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;September;7:100142.</p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/9407efc9/814caabc.mp3" length="22354948" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/hYZAwjyv6kPFrs_pyNZxE9kph_LGpFSTfV5bTIHrCP8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE2OTcxMzcv/MTcwNTc4MjA5Ni1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1578</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis is joined by OG co-host Mike Verkest and Dr. Brent Myers from NAEMSP 2024. We discuss an intriguing concept in cardiac arrest… giving the initial dose of epinephrine IM instead of starting an IV or IO. They discuss a 2021 paper that compared this approach to standard dosing in a feasibility study done in Salt Lake City. Those authors released some additional data from this study… this time about survival. We talk about the potential ramifications.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Citations:</strong></p><p>Pugh AE, Stoecklein HH, Tonna JE, Hoareau GL, Johnson MA, Youngquist ST: Intramuscular adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with faster drug delivery: A feasibility study. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;September;7:100142.</p><p><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP E79 - Head Up CPR – Not So FAST</title>
      <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>79</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP E79 - Head Up CPR – Not So FAST</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ff38f8c-c7f7-4d2f-af1b-ffa19215bc97</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5a2db60d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>EMS History is full of interventions we've rapidly adopted, often at great expense and with disruption of existing processes, that later turned out to, how should I say this..... not work. Want examples? MAST and high-volume crystalloids in trauma. Mechanical compression devices, high-dose epinephrine, indiscriminate calcium administration in cardiac arrest. Do I even need to mention backboards? The next bright, shiny thing promising to revolutionize cardiac arrest resuscitation is Head-Up CPR. It's certainly expensive and disruptive, but does it improve outcomes? What is the evidence?</p><p>Dr. Jarvis has thoughts. He goes deep on this topic, using a recent paper on Head-Up CPR to discuss how he evaluates new interventions for adoption. Oh, and he has thoughts on science in general.</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Moore JC, Pepe PE, Scheppke KA, Lick C, Duval S, Holley J, Salverda B, Jacobs M, Nystrom P, Quinn R, et al.: Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival. Resuscitation. 2022;October;179:9–17.<br>2. Swaminathan A: Heads Up! There is No Association with Improved Outcomes for Head Up CPR: Why We Must Read Past the Abstract.RebelEM. Available at https://rebelem.com/heads- up-there-is-no-association-with-improved-outcomes-for-head-up-cpr-why-we-must-read-past-the-abstract/.<br>3. Mohan M, Swaminathan AK: Heads Up! Data Dredging Coming Through: Heads Up Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Does Not Improve Outcomes. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023;February;81(2):244–5.<br>4. Jarvis J: Not so fast: More evidence needed in head-up CPR.ems1.com. Available at https://www.ems1.com/ems-products/cpr-resuscitaCon/arCcles/not-so-fast-more-evidence- needed-in-head-up-cpr-ZK2O7yt5eb8jryYm/. Accessed December 9, 2023.<br>5. Moore JC: Faster Cme to automated elevation of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the probability of return of spontaneous circulation. ResuscitaCon. 2022;Jan(170):62–9.<br>6. Pepe PE, Scheppke KA, Antevy PM, Crowe RP, Millstone D, Coyle C, Prusansky C, Garay S, Ellis R, Fowler RL, et al.: Conﬁrming the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of a Bundled Methodology to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving a Head-Up/Torso-Up Chest Compression<br>Technique. Crit Care Med. 2019;March;47(3):449–55.<br>7. Metro Fire Chiefs: First-In Responders Providing Neuroprotective (“Heads-Up”) CPR as the Standard of Care for Emergency Medical Services Systems.NFPA. Available at https://www.nfpa.org/-/media/Files/Membership/member-secCons/Metro-Chiefs/Urban-FireForum/2023/UFF23_NPCPR-PosiCon-Statement.ashx. Accessed November 4, 2023.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>EMS History is full of interventions we've rapidly adopted, often at great expense and with disruption of existing processes, that later turned out to, how should I say this..... not work. Want examples? MAST and high-volume crystalloids in trauma. Mechanical compression devices, high-dose epinephrine, indiscriminate calcium administration in cardiac arrest. Do I even need to mention backboards? The next bright, shiny thing promising to revolutionize cardiac arrest resuscitation is Head-Up CPR. It's certainly expensive and disruptive, but does it improve outcomes? What is the evidence?</p><p>Dr. Jarvis has thoughts. He goes deep on this topic, using a recent paper on Head-Up CPR to discuss how he evaluates new interventions for adoption. Oh, and he has thoughts on science in general.</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Moore JC, Pepe PE, Scheppke KA, Lick C, Duval S, Holley J, Salverda B, Jacobs M, Nystrom P, Quinn R, et al.: Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival. Resuscitation. 2022;October;179:9–17.<br>2. Swaminathan A: Heads Up! There is No Association with Improved Outcomes for Head Up CPR: Why We Must Read Past the Abstract.RebelEM. Available at https://rebelem.com/heads- up-there-is-no-association-with-improved-outcomes-for-head-up-cpr-why-we-must-read-past-the-abstract/.<br>3. Mohan M, Swaminathan AK: Heads Up! Data Dredging Coming Through: Heads Up Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Does Not Improve Outcomes. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023;February;81(2):244–5.<br>4. Jarvis J: Not so fast: More evidence needed in head-up CPR.ems1.com. Available at https://www.ems1.com/ems-products/cpr-resuscitaCon/arCcles/not-so-fast-more-evidence- needed-in-head-up-cpr-ZK2O7yt5eb8jryYm/. Accessed December 9, 2023.<br>5. Moore JC: Faster Cme to automated elevation of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the probability of return of spontaneous circulation. ResuscitaCon. 2022;Jan(170):62–9.<br>6. Pepe PE, Scheppke KA, Antevy PM, Crowe RP, Millstone D, Coyle C, Prusansky C, Garay S, Ellis R, Fowler RL, et al.: Conﬁrming the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of a Bundled Methodology to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving a Head-Up/Torso-Up Chest Compression<br>Technique. Crit Care Med. 2019;March;47(3):449–55.<br>7. Metro Fire Chiefs: First-In Responders Providing Neuroprotective (“Heads-Up”) CPR as the Standard of Care for Emergency Medical Services Systems.NFPA. Available at https://www.nfpa.org/-/media/Files/Membership/member-secCons/Metro-Chiefs/Urban-FireForum/2023/UFF23_NPCPR-PosiCon-Statement.ashx. Accessed November 4, 2023.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/5a2db60d/856bce11.mp3" length="32725962" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/z_n51jw9JcDBCEC1uSIkzRvNZWsOHV1jgP1lwKJbt3k/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE2Mzk5MzEv/MTcwMjMwMzc1Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2288</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>EMS History is full of interventions we've rapidly adopted, often at great expense and with disruption of existing processes, that later turned out to, how should I say this..... not work. Want examples? MAST and high-volume crystalloids in trauma. Mechanical compression devices, high-dose epinephrine, indiscriminate calcium administration in cardiac arrest. Do I even need to mention backboards? The next bright, shiny thing promising to revolutionize cardiac arrest resuscitation is Head-Up CPR. It's certainly expensive and disruptive, but does it improve outcomes? What is the evidence?</p><p>Dr. Jarvis has thoughts. He goes deep on this topic, using a recent paper on Head-Up CPR to discuss how he evaluates new interventions for adoption. Oh, and he has thoughts on science in general.</p><p>Citations:<br>1. Moore JC, Pepe PE, Scheppke KA, Lick C, Duval S, Holley J, Salverda B, Jacobs M, Nystrom P, Quinn R, et al.: Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival. Resuscitation. 2022;October;179:9–17.<br>2. Swaminathan A: Heads Up! There is No Association with Improved Outcomes for Head Up CPR: Why We Must Read Past the Abstract.RebelEM. Available at https://rebelem.com/heads- up-there-is-no-association-with-improved-outcomes-for-head-up-cpr-why-we-must-read-past-the-abstract/.<br>3. Mohan M, Swaminathan AK: Heads Up! Data Dredging Coming Through: Heads Up Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Does Not Improve Outcomes. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023;February;81(2):244–5.<br>4. Jarvis J: Not so fast: More evidence needed in head-up CPR.ems1.com. Available at https://www.ems1.com/ems-products/cpr-resuscitaCon/arCcles/not-so-fast-more-evidence- needed-in-head-up-cpr-ZK2O7yt5eb8jryYm/. Accessed December 9, 2023.<br>5. Moore JC: Faster Cme to automated elevation of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the probability of return of spontaneous circulation. ResuscitaCon. 2022;Jan(170):62–9.<br>6. Pepe PE, Scheppke KA, Antevy PM, Crowe RP, Millstone D, Coyle C, Prusansky C, Garay S, Ellis R, Fowler RL, et al.: Conﬁrming the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of a Bundled Methodology to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving a Head-Up/Torso-Up Chest Compression<br>Technique. Crit Care Med. 2019;March;47(3):449–55.<br>7. Metro Fire Chiefs: First-In Responders Providing Neuroprotective (“Heads-Up”) CPR as the Standard of Care for Emergency Medical Services Systems.NFPA. Available at https://www.nfpa.org/-/media/Files/Membership/member-secCons/Metro-Chiefs/Urban-FireForum/2023/UFF23_NPCPR-PosiCon-Statement.ashx. Accessed November 4, 2023.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP E78 – Racial Disparities in EMS Analgesia </title>
      <itunes:episode>78</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>78</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP E78 – Racial Disparities in EMS Analgesia </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd8dabaa-f4ff-4bdb-ad67-b9e5b6fac17b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d43f1b26</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What would you say if I told you that Black patients were less likely to receive pain medication compared with white patients? My guess is you’d either question the methods, assume it isn’t possible, or ask why. Regardless of what your answer is, you’re going to want to listen to this episode. Mikey V returns to co-host a live episode from the ESO PCRF research forum, where we interview Drs. Remle Crowe and Jamie Kennel about their new research on this subject. I learned some things, and I think you will, too. </p><p> </p><p>Here's a link to future ESO PCRF research forums:</p><p><a href="https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/">https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Citation:</strong></p><p>Crowe RP, Kennel J, Fernandez AR, Burton BA, Wang HE, Van Vleet L, Bourn SS, Myers JB: Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Pain Management for Patients With Long Bone Fractures. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.035">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.035</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What would you say if I told you that Black patients were less likely to receive pain medication compared with white patients? My guess is you’d either question the methods, assume it isn’t possible, or ask why. Regardless of what your answer is, you’re going to want to listen to this episode. Mikey V returns to co-host a live episode from the ESO PCRF research forum, where we interview Drs. Remle Crowe and Jamie Kennel about their new research on this subject. I learned some things, and I think you will, too. </p><p> </p><p>Here's a link to future ESO PCRF research forums:</p><p><a href="https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/">https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Citation:</strong></p><p>Crowe RP, Kennel J, Fernandez AR, Burton BA, Wang HE, Van Vleet L, Bourn SS, Myers JB: Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Pain Management for Patients With Long Bone Fractures. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.035">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.035</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 23:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/d43f1b26/ce9e33ac.mp3" length="47414067" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/57ojzjuDmS68W2-8fz-2sweE_sHuYt15b2i9oR0keoU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE1Mzg5MTQv/MTY5NjgwODA0Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>What would you say if I told you that Black patients were less likely to receive pain medication compared with white patients? My guess is you’d either question the methods, assume it isn’t possible, or ask why. Regardless of what your answer is, you’re going to want to listen to this episode. Mikey V returns to co-host a live episode from the ESO PCRF research forum, where we interview Drs. Remle Crowe and Jamie Kennel about their new research on this subject. I learned some things, and I think you will, too. </p><p> </p><p>Here's a link to future ESO PCRF research forums:</p><p><a href="https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/">https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Citation:</strong></p><p>Crowe RP, Kennel J, Fernandez AR, Burton BA, Wang HE, Van Vleet L, Bourn SS, Myers JB: Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Pain Management for Patients With Long Bone Fractures. Annals of Emergency Medicine. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.035">10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.035</a> (Epub ahead of print).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP E77 – Should We Reduce Sedative Dosing In RSI Of Hypotensive Patients?</title>
      <itunes:episode>77</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>77</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP E77 – Should We Reduce Sedative Dosing In RSI Of Hypotensive Patients?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef1f8be5-f331-47b1-8055-a90adf34ec1e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b55e85d6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you heard that you’re supposed to decrease the dose of your sedative when performing RSI on hypotensive patients? First, avoid asking why you haven’t addressed the hypotension before intubating.. maybe there’s a reason. Maybe. But, regardless of why, intubate you will. What about those doses? I’ve been hearing for years that I should be dropping the dose of sedation before RSI. But what evidence are these recommendations based on?</p><p> </p><p>Today, we reviewed a paper aimed at providing some evidence on this question. Oh, and I offer a gratuitous plug for the ESO/PCRF Research Forum nerdvanna. Here’s the URL for more information:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/">https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Citation:</strong></p><p>Driver BE, Trent SA, Prekker ME, Reardon RF, Brown CA: Sedative Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation and Postintubation Hypotension: Is There an Association? Annals of Emergency Medicine. June 2023 (Epub Ahead of Print)</p><p> </p><p><strong>Also discussed:</strong></p><p>Pappal RD, Roberts BW, Mohr NM, Ablordeppey E, Wessman BT, Drewry AM, Winkler W, Yan Y, Kollef MH, Avidan MS, et al.: The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(5):532–44.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you heard that you’re supposed to decrease the dose of your sedative when performing RSI on hypotensive patients? First, avoid asking why you haven’t addressed the hypotension before intubating.. maybe there’s a reason. Maybe. But, regardless of why, intubate you will. What about those doses? I’ve been hearing for years that I should be dropping the dose of sedation before RSI. But what evidence are these recommendations based on?</p><p> </p><p>Today, we reviewed a paper aimed at providing some evidence on this question. Oh, and I offer a gratuitous plug for the ESO/PCRF Research Forum nerdvanna. Here’s the URL for more information:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/">https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Citation:</strong></p><p>Driver BE, Trent SA, Prekker ME, Reardon RF, Brown CA: Sedative Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation and Postintubation Hypotension: Is There an Association? Annals of Emergency Medicine. June 2023 (Epub Ahead of Print)</p><p> </p><p><strong>Also discussed:</strong></p><p>Pappal RD, Roberts BW, Mohr NM, Ablordeppey E, Wessman BT, Drewry AM, Winkler W, Yan Y, Kollef MH, Avidan MS, et al.: The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(5):532–44.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 20:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/b55e85d6/5cc758b4.mp3" length="19997098" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/o-kLrGLjZzJjXiLCt-cpSnMI60PEZPnHgRdIjWYSPyE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0OTcyMjQv/MTY5NDIwNDMyOS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1420</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you heard that you’re supposed to decrease the dose of your sedative when performing RSI on hypotensive patients? First, avoid asking why you haven’t addressed the hypotension before intubating.. maybe there’s a reason. Maybe. But, regardless of why, intubate you will. What about those doses? I’ve been hearing for years that I should be dropping the dose of sedation before RSI. But what evidence are these recommendations based on?</p><p> </p><p>Today, we reviewed a paper aimed at providing some evidence on this question. Oh, and I offer a gratuitous plug for the ESO/PCRF Research Forum nerdvanna. Here’s the URL for more information:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/">https://www.eso.com/events/research-forum-pcrf/</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Citation:</strong></p><p>Driver BE, Trent SA, Prekker ME, Reardon RF, Brown CA: Sedative Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation and Postintubation Hypotension: Is There an Association? Annals of Emergency Medicine. June 2023 (Epub Ahead of Print)</p><p> </p><p><strong>Also discussed:</strong></p><p>Pappal RD, Roberts BW, Mohr NM, Ablordeppey E, Wessman BT, Drewry AM, Winkler W, Yan Y, Kollef MH, Avidan MS, et al.: The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(5):532–44.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP – E76 – One and Done Epinephrine</title>
      <itunes:episode>76</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>76</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP – E76 – One and Done Epinephrine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00f71716-3dab-4855-822d-aa989cc32bbe</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/10457d97</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Y’all know I have thoughts on epinephrine in cardiac arrest. Perhaps you might have heard me say epinephrine “saves the heart at the expense of the brain.” I’ve also said I don’t have an issue with any epinephrine in arrest, just how we give it currently, and have wondered if less epi might do the trick. We reviewed the One and Done paper recently published from North Carolina that looks at this question.</p><p> </p><p>Citations: </p><p>1.      Ashburn NP, Beaver BP, Snavely AC, Nazir N, Winslow JT, Nelson RD, Mahler SA, Stopyra JP: One and Done Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest? Outcomes in a Multiagency United States Study. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2022;September 26;27(6):751–7.</p><p>2.      Fernando SM, Mathew R, Sadeghirad B, Rochwerg B, Hibbert B, Munshi L, Fan E, Brodie D, Di Santo P, Tran A, et al.: Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Chest. 2023;August;164(2):381–93.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Y’all know I have thoughts on epinephrine in cardiac arrest. Perhaps you might have heard me say epinephrine “saves the heart at the expense of the brain.” I’ve also said I don’t have an issue with any epinephrine in arrest, just how we give it currently, and have wondered if less epi might do the trick. We reviewed the One and Done paper recently published from North Carolina that looks at this question.</p><p> </p><p>Citations: </p><p>1.      Ashburn NP, Beaver BP, Snavely AC, Nazir N, Winslow JT, Nelson RD, Mahler SA, Stopyra JP: One and Done Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest? Outcomes in a Multiagency United States Study. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2022;September 26;27(6):751–7.</p><p>2.      Fernando SM, Mathew R, Sadeghirad B, Rochwerg B, Hibbert B, Munshi L, Fan E, Brodie D, Di Santo P, Tran A, et al.: Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Chest. 2023;August;164(2):381–93.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 22:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/10457d97/a84460fb.mp3" length="19220326" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Long Pause Media | FlightBridgeED</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_TBeSysc-_ovhctCBJnEsn3fHx1ID_w6Z2fk81DBPDA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0ODAyNDMv/MTY5MzI2MTE4NS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1362</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Y’all know I have thoughts on epinephrine in cardiac arrest. Perhaps you might have heard me say epinephrine “saves the heart at the expense of the brain.” I’ve also said I don’t have an issue with any epinephrine in arrest, just how we give it currently, and have wondered if less epi might do the trick. We reviewed the One and Done paper recently published from North Carolina that looks at this question.</p><p> </p><p>Citations: </p><p>1.      Ashburn NP, Beaver BP, Snavely AC, Nazir N, Winslow JT, Nelson RD, Mahler SA, Stopyra JP: One and Done Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest? Outcomes in a Multiagency United States Study. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2022;September 26;27(6):751–7.</p><p>2.      Fernando SM, Mathew R, Sadeghirad B, Rochwerg B, Hibbert B, Munshi L, Fan E, Brodie D, Di Santo P, Tran A, et al.: Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Chest. 2023;August;164(2):381–93.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP E75 - The Device Trial</title>
      <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>75</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP E75 - The Device Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6f22184-3465-481a-b5e5-b045016c6a27</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1cd670b6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’ve spoken a lot recently about intubation First-Pass Success, including the definition. We’ve also discussed different papers about the impact the type of laryngoscope, video or direct, has on first-pass success. A new paper compares video vs. direct laryngoscopy directly. Join us to discuss the DEVICE trial.</p><p> </p><p>Citations: <br>1) Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, et al. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. Published online June 16, 2023 <br>2) Jarvis JL, McClure SF, Johns D. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 <br>3) Ducharme S, Kramer B, Gelbart D, Colleran C, Risavi B, Carlson JN. A pilot, prospective, randomized trial of video versus direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation. Resuscitation. 2017 <br>4) Pourmand A, Terrebonne E, Gerber S, Shipley J, Tran QK. Efficacy of Video Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Prehospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 <br>5) Brown CA, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 <br>6) Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’ve spoken a lot recently about intubation First-Pass Success, including the definition. We’ve also discussed different papers about the impact the type of laryngoscope, video or direct, has on first-pass success. A new paper compares video vs. direct laryngoscopy directly. Join us to discuss the DEVICE trial.</p><p> </p><p>Citations: <br>1) Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, et al. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. Published online June 16, 2023 <br>2) Jarvis JL, McClure SF, Johns D. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 <br>3) Ducharme S, Kramer B, Gelbart D, Colleran C, Risavi B, Carlson JN. A pilot, prospective, randomized trial of video versus direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation. Resuscitation. 2017 <br>4) Pourmand A, Terrebonne E, Gerber S, Shipley J, Tran QK. Efficacy of Video Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Prehospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 <br>5) Brown CA, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 <br>6) Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/1cd670b6/3dff5d3d.mp3" length="36409801" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/SJCY2oLVQ7oQhefE7rQ3TNg-byy5kPOPrAyP-op8R4o/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MTIv/MTY5MDEyNjM5OC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2274</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’ve spoken a lot recently about intubation First-Pass Success, including the definition. We’ve also discussed different papers about the impact the type of laryngoscope, video or direct, has on first-pass success. A new paper compares video vs. direct laryngoscopy directly. Join us to discuss the DEVICE trial.</p><p> </p><p>Citations: <br>1) Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, et al. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. Published online June 16, 2023 <br>2) Jarvis JL, McClure SF, Johns D. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 <br>3) Ducharme S, Kramer B, Gelbart D, Colleran C, Risavi B, Carlson JN. A pilot, prospective, randomized trial of video versus direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation. Resuscitation. 2017 <br>4) Pourmand A, Terrebonne E, Gerber S, Shipley J, Tran QK. Efficacy of Video Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Prehospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 <br>5) Brown CA, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 <br>6) Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP – E74 – What Even IS First Pass Success</title>
      <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>74</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP – E74 – What Even IS First Pass Success</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac7738a8-8066-4e91-8235-b035000c0dd0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/37056724</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What even is FPS? There's been a long-running argument about the definition of FPS. By argument, I mean mostly established in the literature, with some people not liking it. FPS is successful ET passage through the cords within 1 attempt at laryngoscopy or when the blade passes the teeth.</p><p>That definition worked well when we were using direct laryngoscopy, where the hard part of intubation was visualization and the easy part was tube passage. But does it still hold in the age of VL, where visualization is easy, and tube passage is the hard part? We discuss a paper on this episode that proposes a new definition that perhaps better meets the needs of the VL era.</p><p><br>Citation:</p><p>Trent SA, Driver BE, Prekker ME, et al. Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Published online April 2023:S0196064423002135. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.021</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What even is FPS? There's been a long-running argument about the definition of FPS. By argument, I mean mostly established in the literature, with some people not liking it. FPS is successful ET passage through the cords within 1 attempt at laryngoscopy or when the blade passes the teeth.</p><p>That definition worked well when we were using direct laryngoscopy, where the hard part of intubation was visualization and the easy part was tube passage. But does it still hold in the age of VL, where visualization is easy, and tube passage is the hard part? We discuss a paper on this episode that proposes a new definition that perhaps better meets the needs of the VL era.</p><p><br>Citation:</p><p>Trent SA, Driver BE, Prekker ME, et al. Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Published online April 2023:S0196064423002135. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.021</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/37056724/a6e8c1b6.mp3" length="19162144" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/zd1iIKQuvssO2A1aTMDHZ5nwqcGwDKFNjTIGo1E-urg/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MTEv/MTY5MDEyNjM5My1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1194</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>What even is FPS? There's been a long-running argument about the definition of FPS. By argument, I mean mostly established in the literature, with some people not liking it. FPS is successful ET passage through the cords within 1 attempt at laryngoscopy or when the blade passes the teeth.</p><p>That definition worked well when we were using direct laryngoscopy, where the hard part of intubation was visualization and the easy part was tube passage. But does it still hold in the age of VL, where visualization is easy, and tube passage is the hard part? We discuss a paper on this episode that proposes a new definition that perhaps better meets the needs of the VL era.</p><p><br>Citation:</p><p>Trent SA, Driver BE, Prekker ME, et al. Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Published online April 2023:S0196064423002135. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.03.021</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep73 - Post-Mortem CT in Blunt Trauma</title>
      <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>73</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep73 - Post-Mortem CT in Blunt Trauma</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b90cf80-6f76-4038-9d7d-b02401250ce9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2afe7271</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A new study describes the utility of post-mortem CT panscans in patients who died either in the field or in the ED to identify mortal and potentially mortal injuries. This paper has a couple of surprising findings that can help EMS focus our efforts on caring for these patients. </p><p>Citations: <br>1. Levin JH, Pecoraro A, Ochs V, Meagher A, Steenburg SD, Hammer PM. Characterization of fatal blunt injuries using post-mortem computed tomography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; Publish Ahead of Print. <br>2. Sakles JC, Ross C, Kovacs G. Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation in the emergency department. JACEP Open. 2023;4(3):e12951. 3. Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, et al. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies*. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(12):1395-1415.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A new study describes the utility of post-mortem CT panscans in patients who died either in the field or in the ED to identify mortal and potentially mortal injuries. This paper has a couple of surprising findings that can help EMS focus our efforts on caring for these patients. </p><p>Citations: <br>1. Levin JH, Pecoraro A, Ochs V, Meagher A, Steenburg SD, Hammer PM. Characterization of fatal blunt injuries using post-mortem computed tomography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; Publish Ahead of Print. <br>2. Sakles JC, Ross C, Kovacs G. Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation in the emergency department. JACEP Open. 2023;4(3):e12951. 3. Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, et al. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies*. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(12):1395-1415.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2afe7271/4b29de5e.mp3" length="15811313" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/9pcV_TXqpSz8ajxuCkPGb_xMvGsH920jqDCNtMT1rks/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MTAv/MTY5MDEyNjM4OC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>985</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A new study describes the utility of post-mortem CT panscans in patients who died either in the field or in the ED to identify mortal and potentially mortal injuries. This paper has a couple of surprising findings that can help EMS focus our efforts on caring for these patients. </p><p>Citations: <br>1. Levin JH, Pecoraro A, Ochs V, Meagher A, Steenburg SD, Hammer PM. Characterization of fatal blunt injuries using post-mortem computed tomography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; Publish Ahead of Print. <br>2. Sakles JC, Ross C, Kovacs G. Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation in the emergency department. JACEP Open. 2023;4(3):e12951. 3. Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, et al. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies*. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(12):1395-1415.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP E72 - DSI vs RSI</title>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>72</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP E72 - DSI vs RSI</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c33c0fe-88f2-4d1b-83b0-b015012608a3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9bdbe6c9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>DSI (delayed sequence intubation) has been proposed as an alternative to RSI (rapid sequence intubation) for patients who can't tolerate interventions needed to properly pre-oxygenate patients. But does it work? There have been several observational studies (blatant bias acknowledgment: I wrote one of them!) suggesting it is safe and effective, but no randomized trials. Well, now we have one. Join Dr. Jarvis as he describes this RCT of DSI vs RSI in adult trauma patients presenting to an Indian ED.</p><p>Citation: Bandyopadhyay A, Kumar P, Jafra A, Thakur H, Yaddanapudi LN, Jain K. Peri-Intubation Hypoxia After Delayed Versus Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Injured Patients on Arrival to Trauma Triage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia. 2023;136(5):913-919.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>DSI (delayed sequence intubation) has been proposed as an alternative to RSI (rapid sequence intubation) for patients who can't tolerate interventions needed to properly pre-oxygenate patients. But does it work? There have been several observational studies (blatant bias acknowledgment: I wrote one of them!) suggesting it is safe and effective, but no randomized trials. Well, now we have one. Join Dr. Jarvis as he describes this RCT of DSI vs RSI in adult trauma patients presenting to an Indian ED.</p><p>Citation: Bandyopadhyay A, Kumar P, Jafra A, Thakur H, Yaddanapudi LN, Jain K. Peri-Intubation Hypoxia After Delayed Versus Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Injured Patients on Arrival to Trauma Triage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia. 2023;136(5):913-919.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 17:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/9bdbe6c9/952d7983.mp3" length="22462088" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/zwnXB5h9k7l0W0d8YtHjAuFIj7roxX40onzHntPAF7Y/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDkv/MTY5MDEyNjM4NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1401</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>DSI (delayed sequence intubation) has been proposed as an alternative to RSI (rapid sequence intubation) for patients who can't tolerate interventions needed to properly pre-oxygenate patients. But does it work? There have been several observational studies (blatant bias acknowledgment: I wrote one of them!) suggesting it is safe and effective, but no randomized trials. Well, now we have one. Join Dr. Jarvis as he describes this RCT of DSI vs RSI in adult trauma patients presenting to an Indian ED.</p><p>Citation: Bandyopadhyay A, Kumar P, Jafra A, Thakur H, Yaddanapudi LN, Jain K. Peri-Intubation Hypoxia After Delayed Versus Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Injured Patients on Arrival to Trauma Triage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia. 2023;136(5):913-919.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 71 - SGA Cage Match: Round 2</title>
      <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>71</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 71 - SGA Cage Match: Round 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0830d7bb-f22c-417d-a0ae-aff50135d644</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c9b77bc7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In episode 69, we interviewed Tanner Smida about his very interesting paper using the ESO dataset. It looked at the association between survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the type of SGA used (iGel vs. KingLT). He found 36% higher odds of survival with iGel. </p><p>The ink was barely dry on that paper before he published a follow-up paper looking at the same association but with a different dataset, this time CARES and the national US registry of OHCA. </p><p>Citations: <br>1. Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: a study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. Published online April 2023:109812. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109812 <br>2. Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. Published online January 18, 2023:1-13. doi:10.1080/10903127.2023.2169422</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In episode 69, we interviewed Tanner Smida about his very interesting paper using the ESO dataset. It looked at the association between survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the type of SGA used (iGel vs. KingLT). He found 36% higher odds of survival with iGel. </p><p>The ink was barely dry on that paper before he published a follow-up paper looking at the same association but with a different dataset, this time CARES and the national US registry of OHCA. </p><p>Citations: <br>1. Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: a study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. Published online April 2023:109812. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109812 <br>2. Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. Published online January 18, 2023:1-13. doi:10.1080/10903127.2023.2169422</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/c9b77bc7/d12c1634.mp3" length="13588700" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/CLsQh_B8KgKmZTo-4ZuWCUlOwKjBWXBjQtf85lvmFdY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDgv/MTY5MDEyNjM3OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>844</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In episode 69, we interviewed Tanner Smida about his very interesting paper using the ESO dataset. It looked at the association between survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the type of SGA used (iGel vs. KingLT). He found 36% higher odds of survival with iGel. </p><p>The ink was barely dry on that paper before he published a follow-up paper looking at the same association but with a different dataset, this time CARES and the national US registry of OHCA. </p><p>Citations: <br>1. Smida T, Menegazzi J, Scheidler J, Martin PS, Salcido D, Bardes J. A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: a study for the CARES surveillance group. Resuscitation. Published online April 2023:109812. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109812 <br>2. Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. Published online January 18, 2023:1-13. doi:10.1080/10903127.2023.2169422</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 70 - Crossover with the EMS Show from Ashland, Oregon!</title>
      <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>70</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 70 - Crossover with the EMS Show from Ashland, Oregon!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8faccc1a-cecf-4c5a-90fe-afe201522e9a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/43d6769a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Man, did we have fun recording this one? I found myself in a hotel room in Ashland, Oregon, with Drs. Ed Racht, Maia Dorsett, and Ritu Sahni talking about Sepsis. We decided this would make for a great crossover episode with The EMS Show, minus our buddy Mikey V. Anytime I get together with this group of friends, I always have fun. We discuss a new sepsis trial, the OG sepsis paper, Dr. River's Early Goal Direct Therapy, and the cautionary tale of performance measures gone awry. We also hit on using EtCO2 as a surrogate for lactate in sepsis and collectively decided Dr. Dorsett is a rockstar. </p><p>Citation: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials Network. Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(6):499-510. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2212663</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Man, did we have fun recording this one? I found myself in a hotel room in Ashland, Oregon, with Drs. Ed Racht, Maia Dorsett, and Ritu Sahni talking about Sepsis. We decided this would make for a great crossover episode with The EMS Show, minus our buddy Mikey V. Anytime I get together with this group of friends, I always have fun. We discuss a new sepsis trial, the OG sepsis paper, Dr. River's Early Goal Direct Therapy, and the cautionary tale of performance measures gone awry. We also hit on using EtCO2 as a surrogate for lactate in sepsis and collectively decided Dr. Dorsett is a rockstar. </p><p>Citation: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials Network. Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(6):499-510. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2212663</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/43d6769a/6798546c.mp3" length="45779656" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/nRSnTQqJvn2YRX-SSopBSuoaRiCxbDaCIRYCMVzqb7E/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDcv/MTY5MDEyNjM3NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2858</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Man, did we have fun recording this one? I found myself in a hotel room in Ashland, Oregon, with Drs. Ed Racht, Maia Dorsett, and Ritu Sahni talking about Sepsis. We decided this would make for a great crossover episode with The EMS Show, minus our buddy Mikey V. Anytime I get together with this group of friends, I always have fun. We discuss a new sepsis trial, the OG sepsis paper, Dr. River's Early Goal Direct Therapy, and the cautionary tale of performance measures gone awry. We also hit on using EtCO2 as a surrogate for lactate in sepsis and collectively decided Dr. Dorsett is a rockstar. </p><p>Citation: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials Network. Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(6):499-510. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2212663</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep 69 - iGel vs King LT in OHCA</title>
      <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>69</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep 69 - iGel vs King LT in OHCA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc08c765-ac48-4596-bc7e-afbc015c5181</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3ca4b917</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The cage match you've all been waiting for! iGel vs King LT in cardiac arrest. Which is associated with higher survival?</p><p>Airways-2 was an RCT of iGel vs. ETI in OHCA and found no difference. PART was an RCT of King LT vs. ETI in OHCA and found a slight difference favoring King LT. How about those patients just getting an SGA? How does the iGel compare to King LT? Dr. Jarvis interviews the amazing young researcher and medical student Tanner Smida about his new paper using the ESO dataset to answer this question. </p><p>Citation: Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. Published online January 18, 2023:1-13.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The cage match you've all been waiting for! iGel vs King LT in cardiac arrest. Which is associated with higher survival?</p><p>Airways-2 was an RCT of iGel vs. ETI in OHCA and found no difference. PART was an RCT of King LT vs. ETI in OHCA and found a slight difference favoring King LT. How about those patients just getting an SGA? How does the iGel compare to King LT? Dr. Jarvis interviews the amazing young researcher and medical student Tanner Smida about his new paper using the ESO dataset to answer this question. </p><p>Citation: Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. Published online January 18, 2023:1-13.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/3ca4b917/3e6ea87f.mp3" length="23828930" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/3W-3txHfayBowZHNTKoflR6jri9QrcIyMZ6zKLCFR3U/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDYv/MTY5MDEyNjM2OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1484</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>The cage match you've all been waiting for! iGel vs King LT in cardiac arrest. Which is associated with higher survival?</p><p>Airways-2 was an RCT of iGel vs. ETI in OHCA and found no difference. PART was an RCT of King LT vs. ETI in OHCA and found a slight difference favoring King LT. How about those patients just getting an SGA? How does the iGel compare to King LT? Dr. Jarvis interviews the amazing young researcher and medical student Tanner Smida about his new paper using the ESO dataset to answer this question. </p><p>Citation: Smida T, Menegazzi J, Crowe R, Scheidler J, Salcido D, Bardes J. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of the iGel and King Laryngeal Tube Supraglottic Airways for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Prehospital Emergency Care. Published online January 18, 2023:1-13.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP  - Episode 68 - The SAVE Trial</title>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>68</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP  - Episode 68 - The SAVE Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7de86ec-49f3-41f2-aa2a-afa1014d3a00</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2a0113e7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember AIRWAYS-2, the British RCT comparing iGel to ETI in adults with cardiac arrest? Have you wondered if those results would hold up in a different prehospital population? Wonder no more! Dr. Jarvis reviews the SAVE Trial, another RCT of adult, non-traumatic cardiac arrest, comparing iGel to ETI in Taiwan. </p><p>Citation: Lee AF, Chien YC, Lee BC, et al. Effect of Placement of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal Intubation on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Taipei, Taiwan: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148871. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48871</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember AIRWAYS-2, the British RCT comparing iGel to ETI in adults with cardiac arrest? Have you wondered if those results would hold up in a different prehospital population? Wonder no more! Dr. Jarvis reviews the SAVE Trial, another RCT of adult, non-traumatic cardiac arrest, comparing iGel to ETI in Taiwan. </p><p>Citation: Lee AF, Chien YC, Lee BC, et al. Effect of Placement of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal Intubation on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Taipei, Taiwan: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148871. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48871</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 20:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2a0113e7/9cd81e31.mp3" length="13596127" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/aBtSxqLJZpdl1LUUisvwWs_Gi-yRSwG0-wqds1NIDFY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDUv/MTY5MDEyNjM2NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>846</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember AIRWAYS-2, the British RCT comparing iGel to ETI in adults with cardiac arrest? Have you wondered if those results would hold up in a different prehospital population? Wonder no more! Dr. Jarvis reviews the SAVE Trial, another RCT of adult, non-traumatic cardiac arrest, comparing iGel to ETI in Taiwan. </p><p>Citation: Lee AF, Chien YC, Lee BC, et al. Effect of Placement of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal Intubation on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Taipei, Taiwan: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148871. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48871</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP EP67 - DOSED-VF</title>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>67</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP EP67 - DOSED-VF</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0df0cc1c-508d-4b08-844a-af68015c3c56</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e655595</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>If one is good, two must be better, right? If it applies to cookies and ice cream, why not defibrillators? That’s the question the DOSED-VF trial set out to answer. We’ve covered this topic in episodes 12 and 27, including going over the pilot trial of DOSED-VF. But now the full meal deal is available. And you may have heard it was stopped early because… well, you’d best listen to find out. </p><p> As a special bonus, Dr. Jarvis explains the difference between odds and risk after falling into the statistical rabbit hole. Remember, this podcast also has a YouTube version complete with graphs and charts (oh, my!): https://www.youtube.com/@FlightbridgeedHEMS/playlists</p><p>Citations: <br>1. Cheskes S, Verbeek PR, Drennan IR, et al. Defibrillation Strategies for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(21):1947-1956. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207304 <br>Other papers discussed in this episode: <br>2. Mapp JG, Hans AJ, Darrington AM, et al. Prehospital Double Sequential Defibrillation: A Matched Case-Control Study. Braithwaite SA, ed. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019;26(9):994-1001. doi:10.1111/acem.13672 <br>3. Beck LR, Ostermayer DG, Ponce JN, Srinivasan S, Wang HE. Effectiveness of Prehospital Dual Sequential Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(5):597-602. doi:10.1080/10903127.2019.1584256 <br>4. Cabanas JG, Myers JB, Williams JG, De Maio VJ, Bachman MW. Double Sequential External Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Report of Ten Cases. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(1):126-130. doi:10.3109/10903127.2014.942476 <br>5. Cheskes S, Dorian P, Feldman M, et al. Double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation: The DOSE VF pilot randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2020;150:178-184. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.010 <br>6. Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R, Pramesh C. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Odds versus risk. Perspect Clin Res. 2015;6(4):222. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.167092</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>If one is good, two must be better, right? If it applies to cookies and ice cream, why not defibrillators? That’s the question the DOSED-VF trial set out to answer. We’ve covered this topic in episodes 12 and 27, including going over the pilot trial of DOSED-VF. But now the full meal deal is available. And you may have heard it was stopped early because… well, you’d best listen to find out. </p><p> As a special bonus, Dr. Jarvis explains the difference between odds and risk after falling into the statistical rabbit hole. Remember, this podcast also has a YouTube version complete with graphs and charts (oh, my!): https://www.youtube.com/@FlightbridgeedHEMS/playlists</p><p>Citations: <br>1. Cheskes S, Verbeek PR, Drennan IR, et al. Defibrillation Strategies for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(21):1947-1956. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207304 <br>Other papers discussed in this episode: <br>2. Mapp JG, Hans AJ, Darrington AM, et al. Prehospital Double Sequential Defibrillation: A Matched Case-Control Study. Braithwaite SA, ed. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019;26(9):994-1001. doi:10.1111/acem.13672 <br>3. Beck LR, Ostermayer DG, Ponce JN, Srinivasan S, Wang HE. Effectiveness of Prehospital Dual Sequential Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(5):597-602. doi:10.1080/10903127.2019.1584256 <br>4. Cabanas JG, Myers JB, Williams JG, De Maio VJ, Bachman MW. Double Sequential External Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Report of Ten Cases. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(1):126-130. doi:10.3109/10903127.2014.942476 <br>5. Cheskes S, Dorian P, Feldman M, et al. Double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation: The DOSE VF pilot randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2020;150:178-184. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.010 <br>6. Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R, Pramesh C. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Odds versus risk. Perspect Clin Res. 2015;6(4):222. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.167092</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/1e655595/28369e0d.mp3" length="33404851" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/8YS8gHxRw2w436V9WeBCMSdWoCxj2EkRQwv0ubfvRNs/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDQv/MTY5MDEyNjM1OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2084</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>If one is good, two must be better, right? If it applies to cookies and ice cream, why not defibrillators? That’s the question the DOSED-VF trial set out to answer. We’ve covered this topic in episodes 12 and 27, including going over the pilot trial of DOSED-VF. But now the full meal deal is available. And you may have heard it was stopped early because… well, you’d best listen to find out. </p><p> As a special bonus, Dr. Jarvis explains the difference between odds and risk after falling into the statistical rabbit hole. Remember, this podcast also has a YouTube version complete with graphs and charts (oh, my!): https://www.youtube.com/@FlightbridgeedHEMS/playlists</p><p>Citations: <br>1. Cheskes S, Verbeek PR, Drennan IR, et al. Defibrillation Strategies for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(21):1947-1956. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207304 <br>Other papers discussed in this episode: <br>2. Mapp JG, Hans AJ, Darrington AM, et al. Prehospital Double Sequential Defibrillation: A Matched Case-Control Study. Braithwaite SA, ed. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019;26(9):994-1001. doi:10.1111/acem.13672 <br>3. Beck LR, Ostermayer DG, Ponce JN, Srinivasan S, Wang HE. Effectiveness of Prehospital Dual Sequential Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia Cardiac Arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(5):597-602. doi:10.1080/10903127.2019.1584256 <br>4. Cabanas JG, Myers JB, Williams JG, De Maio VJ, Bachman MW. Double Sequential External Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Report of Ten Cases. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(1):126-130. doi:10.3109/10903127.2014.942476 <br>5. Cheskes S, Dorian P, Feldman M, et al. Double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation: The DOSE VF pilot randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2020;150:178-184. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.010 <br>6. Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R, Pramesh C. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Odds versus risk. Perspect Clin Res. 2015;6(4):222. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.167092</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP Episode 65: SpO2 vs SaO2 Variations Between Races</title>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>66</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP Episode 65: SpO2 vs SaO2 Variations Between Races</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2badd670-7103-4e28-882e-af53017ec6d7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/119a6cb3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Crowe returns to the EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast from our “vacation” in Mexico to discuss the impact of variations between pulse oximetry and blood gas values across races.</p><p> </p><p>Citations:</p><ol><li>Sudat SEK, Wesson P, Rhoads KF, et al. Racial Disparities in Pulse Oximeter Device Inaccuracy and Estimated Clinical Impact on COVID-19 Treatment Course. <em>Am J Epidemiol</em>. Published online September 2022:kwac164. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac164">10.1093/aje/kwac164</a></li><li>Fawzy A, Wu TD, Wang K, et al. Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19. <em>JAMA Intern Med</em>. 2022;182(7):730. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906">10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906</a></li></ol>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Crowe returns to the EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast from our “vacation” in Mexico to discuss the impact of variations between pulse oximetry and blood gas values across races.</p><p> </p><p>Citations:</p><ol><li>Sudat SEK, Wesson P, Rhoads KF, et al. Racial Disparities in Pulse Oximeter Device Inaccuracy and Estimated Clinical Impact on COVID-19 Treatment Course. <em>Am J Epidemiol</em>. Published online September 2022:kwac164. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac164">10.1093/aje/kwac164</a></li><li>Fawzy A, Wu TD, Wang K, et al. Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19. <em>JAMA Intern Med</em>. 2022;182(7):730. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906">10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906</a></li></ol>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 19:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/119a6cb3/0d52e5f4.mp3" length="27711549" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/ZS7CtMlQJMwyOdCEeFFQJ9RwACuOspDGlLop4S02OYw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDMv/MTY5MDEyNjM1NS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1729</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Crowe returns to the EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast from our “vacation” in Mexico to discuss the impact of variations between pulse oximetry and blood gas values across races.</p><p> </p><p>Citations:</p><ol><li>Sudat SEK, Wesson P, Rhoads KF, et al. Racial Disparities in Pulse Oximeter Device Inaccuracy and Estimated Clinical Impact on COVID-19 Treatment Course. <em>Am J Epidemiol</em>. Published online September 2022:kwac164. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac164">10.1093/aje/kwac164</a></li><li>Fawzy A, Wu TD, Wang K, et al. Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19. <em>JAMA Intern Med</em>. 2022;182(7):730. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906">10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906</a></li></ol>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real World Midazolam Use In Seizures</title>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>65</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Real World Midazolam Use In Seizures</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17a79c0a-d042-4684-b511-af16002f7a28</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/70a42835</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>National guidelines for the management of seizures recommend midazolam 10 mg IM as first-line therapy. The big question is how often EMS follows this guideline or how well that guideline matches up to real-world use. Dr. Jarvis makes a road trip to ESO headquarters to discuss this paper using the ESO research dataset with newly minted Texan Mike Verkest and special guest Dr. Remle Crowe. As we get our nerd on, we go deep into the very interesting methodology used in this paper!</p><p>Citation: Guterman EL, Sporer KA, Newman TB, et al. Real-World Midazolam Use and Outcomes With Out-of-Hospital Treatment of Status Epilepticus in the United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Published online August 2022. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.05.024</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>National guidelines for the management of seizures recommend midazolam 10 mg IM as first-line therapy. The big question is how often EMS follows this guideline or how well that guideline matches up to real-world use. Dr. Jarvis makes a road trip to ESO headquarters to discuss this paper using the ESO research dataset with newly minted Texan Mike Verkest and special guest Dr. Remle Crowe. As we get our nerd on, we go deep into the very interesting methodology used in this paper!</p><p>Citation: Guterman EL, Sporer KA, Newman TB, et al. Real-World Midazolam Use and Outcomes With Out-of-Hospital Treatment of Status Epilepticus in the United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Published online August 2022. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.05.024</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/70a42835/d1c5334c.mp3" length="52830095" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/iTTghL2fpNGkeJHO82YvQBIWmjCFxL5PYD3nYUuPYLw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDIv/MTY5MDEyNjM1MC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3298</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>National guidelines for the management of seizures recommend midazolam 10 mg IM as first-line therapy. The big question is how often EMS follows this guideline or how well that guideline matches up to real-world use. Dr. Jarvis makes a road trip to ESO headquarters to discuss this paper using the ESO research dataset with newly minted Texan Mike Verkest and special guest Dr. Remle Crowe. As we get our nerd on, we go deep into the very interesting methodology used in this paper!</p><p>Citation: Guterman EL, Sporer KA, Newman TB, et al. Real-World Midazolam Use and Outcomes With Out-of-Hospital Treatment of Status Epilepticus in the United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Published online August 2022. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.05.024</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP Episode 64: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Trois</title>
      <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>64</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP Episode 64: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Trois</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a112a156-2603-47fd-9153-af02000a1854</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/de2da016</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>First, there was Episode 31: TXA for Epistaxis (the Zahed RCT from Tehran), then Episode 40: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Deux (the NoPAC trial), and now Episode 64: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Trois, another Iranian RCT.</p><p> So, we have conflicting evidence, all from RCTs, about whether TXA works for epistaxis. Dr. Jarvis reviews the prior trials and then provides a more detailed analysis of the new evidence. He then discusses how he handles conflicting evidence. </p><p>Citation: Hosseinialhashemi M, Jahangiri R, Faramarzi A, et al. Intranasal Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid in Atraumatic Anterior Epistaxis: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2022;80(3):182-188. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.04.010</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>First, there was Episode 31: TXA for Epistaxis (the Zahed RCT from Tehran), then Episode 40: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Deux (the NoPAC trial), and now Episode 64: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Trois, another Iranian RCT.</p><p> So, we have conflicting evidence, all from RCTs, about whether TXA works for epistaxis. Dr. Jarvis reviews the prior trials and then provides a more detailed analysis of the new evidence. He then discusses how he handles conflicting evidence. </p><p>Citation: Hosseinialhashemi M, Jahangiri R, Faramarzi A, et al. Intranasal Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid in Atraumatic Anterior Epistaxis: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2022;80(3):182-188. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.04.010</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/de2da016/331e85e3.mp3" length="17773916" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/j560DMT1ucHW2igGdT9iVW5MCsUAXXHLXn2GHSdEeV0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDEv/MTY5MDEyNjM0NS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1108</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>First, there was Episode 31: TXA for Epistaxis (the Zahed RCT from Tehran), then Episode 40: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Deux (the NoPAC trial), and now Episode 64: TXA for Epistaxis, Part Trois, another Iranian RCT.</p><p> So, we have conflicting evidence, all from RCTs, about whether TXA works for epistaxis. Dr. Jarvis reviews the prior trials and then provides a more detailed analysis of the new evidence. He then discusses how he handles conflicting evidence. </p><p>Citation: Hosseinialhashemi M, Jahangiri R, Faramarzi A, et al. Intranasal Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid in Atraumatic Anterior Epistaxis: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2022;80(3):182-188. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.04.010</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP - E63 - Unpacking Paxlovid</title>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>63</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP - E63 - Unpacking Paxlovid</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6dc138be-14bd-437d-b861-aee7016b3b48</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/cf90f043</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>COVID sucks, no doubt about it. Vaccination has been a game changer for how we live through the pandemic, but we still need therapeutics for those breakthrough cases and the unvaccinated amongst us. Paxlovid is a novel anti-viral agent that showed promise in an initial industry-sponsored trial among unvaccinated patients with the delta strain. But does it hold up in the real world where vaccination is common, and omicron has pushed delta to the wayside? Dr. Jarvis reviews the initial RCT and a recent Israeli observational trial where more than 75% of patients were vaccinated. He also covers the contraindications for its use. Finally, he’ll no doubt massacre the almost impossible-to-pronounce generic names for the drugs in Paxlovid.</p><p>Citations: Najjar-Debbiny R, Gronich N, Weber G, et al. Effectiveness of Paxlovid in Reducing Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Mortality in High-Risk Patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online June 2, 2022:ciac443. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac443 2.Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, et al. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(15):1397-1408. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118542</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>COVID sucks, no doubt about it. Vaccination has been a game changer for how we live through the pandemic, but we still need therapeutics for those breakthrough cases and the unvaccinated amongst us. Paxlovid is a novel anti-viral agent that showed promise in an initial industry-sponsored trial among unvaccinated patients with the delta strain. But does it hold up in the real world where vaccination is common, and omicron has pushed delta to the wayside? Dr. Jarvis reviews the initial RCT and a recent Israeli observational trial where more than 75% of patients were vaccinated. He also covers the contraindications for its use. Finally, he’ll no doubt massacre the almost impossible-to-pronounce generic names for the drugs in Paxlovid.</p><p>Citations: Najjar-Debbiny R, Gronich N, Weber G, et al. Effectiveness of Paxlovid in Reducing Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Mortality in High-Risk Patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online June 2, 2022:ciac443. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac443 2.Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, et al. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(15):1397-1408. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118542</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/cf90f043/c160f592.mp3" length="18049920" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/bjPotEGFhvGPLNAF66h49KOFn-mve0bQLfAmbbnGMxo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0Mjk0MDAv/MTY5MDEyNjM0MC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1126</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>COVID sucks, no doubt about it. Vaccination has been a game changer for how we live through the pandemic, but we still need therapeutics for those breakthrough cases and the unvaccinated amongst us. Paxlovid is a novel anti-viral agent that showed promise in an initial industry-sponsored trial among unvaccinated patients with the delta strain. But does it hold up in the real world where vaccination is common, and omicron has pushed delta to the wayside? Dr. Jarvis reviews the initial RCT and a recent Israeli observational trial where more than 75% of patients were vaccinated. He also covers the contraindications for its use. Finally, he’ll no doubt massacre the almost impossible-to-pronounce generic names for the drugs in Paxlovid.</p><p>Citations: Najjar-Debbiny R, Gronich N, Weber G, et al. Effectiveness of Paxlovid in Reducing Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Mortality in High-Risk Patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online June 2, 2022:ciac443. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac443 2.Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, et al. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(15):1397-1408. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118542</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP - E62 - Esmolol in cardiac Arrest?</title>
      <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>62</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP - E62 - Esmolol in cardiac Arrest?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7fd381ae-890b-4986-b950-aeda003a1cf9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6fcc81bf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our good friends at Montgomery County Hospital District EMS in suburban Houston brings us a nice feasibility study about the use of esmolol for refractory v-fib. Dr. Jarvis discusses why this is a helpful study. </p><p>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our good friends at Montgomery County Hospital District EMS in suburban Houston brings us a nice feasibility study about the use of esmolol for refractory v-fib. Dr. Jarvis discusses why this is a helpful study. </p><p>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 03:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/6fcc81bf/bc548713.mp3" length="9809917" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/o1sW9wWq8EBuQZY0ZJ4oCAWMiCYEMctkKzE0WHsbFts/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTkv/MTY5MDEyNjMzNS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>608</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our good friends at Montgomery County Hospital District EMS in suburban Houston brings us a nice feasibility study about the use of esmolol for refractory v-fib. Dr. Jarvis discusses why this is a helpful study. </p><p>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP Episode 61: Red Lights &amp; Sirens Collaborative</title>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>61</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP Episode 61: Red Lights &amp; Sirens Collaborative</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">82ec2835-b09c-4a92-97ae-aecb001cdf32</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d71f00ad</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis interviewed several EMS industry leaders, discussing why we should use Red Lights &amp; Sirens as a clinical intervention and only as indicated. This podcast is part of the first-ever national EMS quality improvement effort led by NEMSQA (https://www.nemsqa.org/lights-and-siren).</p><p>Join us for interviews with Drs. Doug Kupas, Lawrence Brown, Michael Redlenner, and Mike Taigman to hear about The Case Against Lights &amp; Sirens. Did you know all of our podcasts are also available in video versions? Check them out on the FlightBridgeED YouTube channel.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis interviewed several EMS industry leaders, discussing why we should use Red Lights &amp; Sirens as a clinical intervention and only as indicated. This podcast is part of the first-ever national EMS quality improvement effort led by NEMSQA (https://www.nemsqa.org/lights-and-siren).</p><p>Join us for interviews with Drs. Doug Kupas, Lawrence Brown, Michael Redlenner, and Mike Taigman to hear about The Case Against Lights &amp; Sirens. Did you know all of our podcasts are also available in video versions? Check them out on the FlightBridgeED YouTube channel.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 01:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/d71f00ad/7fde812c.mp3" length="94061489" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/ZgIXNdkWt7VMisXkIDK3Mb8PltnvvzUGeDuZhfnTb9g/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTgv/MTY5MDEyNjMzMC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>5876</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis interviewed several EMS industry leaders, discussing why we should use Red Lights &amp; Sirens as a clinical intervention and only as indicated. This podcast is part of the first-ever national EMS quality improvement effort led by NEMSQA (https://www.nemsqa.org/lights-and-siren).</p><p>Join us for interviews with Drs. Doug Kupas, Lawrence Brown, Michael Redlenner, and Mike Taigman to hear about The Case Against Lights &amp; Sirens. Did you know all of our podcasts are also available in video versions? Check them out on the FlightBridgeED YouTube channel.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP – Episode 60 – Dueling ECMO Papers</title>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>60</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP – Episode 60 – Dueling ECMO Papers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18d3757b-27f4-45ce-bf1c-aeb6003a3464</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/40cc32fd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>During my FAST22 talk, I received a great question about what to make of two different papers, seemingly on the same topic, that give different results. In this case, it was about the Prague study Mike and I spoke about on the last episode (E59) and the one from Minneapolis (the ARREST trial). It was a great question that I’ll discuss in this episode. I’ll also talk more about the ARREST trial.</p><p> If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>During my FAST22 talk, I received a great question about what to make of two different papers, seemingly on the same topic, that give different results. In this case, it was about the Prague study Mike and I spoke about on the last episode (E59) and the one from Minneapolis (the ARREST trial). It was a great question that I’ll discuss in this episode. I’ll also talk more about the ARREST trial.</p><p> If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 03:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/40cc32fd/92b115f3.mp3" length="20432054" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/WsjQh7c5Ety_pecSI_EymvHgsbd6SMyQvaPtJlNT054/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTcv/MTY5MDEyNjMyNS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1273</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>During my FAST22 talk, I received a great question about what to make of two different papers, seemingly on the same topic, that give different results. In this case, it was about the Prague study Mike and I spoke about on the last episode (E59) and the one from Minneapolis (the ARREST trial). It was a great question that I’ll discuss in this episode. I’ll also talk more about the ARREST trial.</p><p> If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP E59 - Cardiac Arrest Transport &amp; ECMO</title>
      <itunes:episode>59</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>59</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP E59 - Cardiac Arrest Transport &amp; ECMO</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7680adce-4d0f-464c-8a23-aea4012fbc1e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8896ee53</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mikey V. and Dr. Jarvis get together again “live” from Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas for FAST22! We took the opportunity to sit down and discuss two papers on cardiac arrest. Should we stay and play, or should we load and go? In other words, should we work our arrests to a conclusion where we find them or rapidly transport them? In a paper from Prague, we discuss whether early transport with LUCAS directly to the cath lab for ECMO and PCI improves survival.</p><p>As a foretaste of a pod to come, we’ll discuss the apparent contrasting results between the Prague ECMO study and one from Minneapolis (The ARREST trial) in a future episode. If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at: Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mikey V. and Dr. Jarvis get together again “live” from Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas for FAST22! We took the opportunity to sit down and discuss two papers on cardiac arrest. Should we stay and play, or should we load and go? In other words, should we work our arrests to a conclusion where we find them or rapidly transport them? In a paper from Prague, we discuss whether early transport with LUCAS directly to the cath lab for ECMO and PCI improves survival.</p><p>As a foretaste of a pod to come, we’ll discuss the apparent contrasting results between the Prague ECMO study and one from Minneapolis (The ARREST trial) in a future episode. If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at: Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/8896ee53/e97c856c.mp3" length="19607959" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/xB-GiY15IILeEH_qTPC7GSLbi-XiVBh9rHX04rlQVtQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTYv/MTY5MDEyNjMyMC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1221</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mikey V. and Dr. Jarvis get together again “live” from Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas for FAST22! We took the opportunity to sit down and discuss two papers on cardiac arrest. Should we stay and play, or should we load and go? In other words, should we work our arrests to a conclusion where we find them or rapidly transport them? In a paper from Prague, we discuss whether early transport with LUCAS directly to the cath lab for ECMO and PCI improves survival.</p><p>As a foretaste of a pod to come, we’ll discuss the apparent contrasting results between the Prague ECMO study and one from Minneapolis (The ARREST trial) in a future episode. If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at: Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP – Episode 57 – Bicarb Use In Cardiac Arrest?</title>
      <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>57</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP – Episode 57 – Bicarb Use In Cardiac Arrest?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">31dc8074-520f-47c6-b0b2-ae8d018977df</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2f67e89a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Y’all have had lots of questions about using sodium bicarbonate in cardiac arrest after we ran an interview with Dr. Menegazzi about an abstract he presented showing a benefit with bicarb. You wanted more, so here it is! Dr. Jarvis reviews a paper from British Columbia from 2017 that looks at just this thing!</p><p><br>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.<br>Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe to the FlightBridgeED channel.</p><p><br>Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at:<br>Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis</p><p><br>Citations:<br>1. Kawano T, Grunau B, Scheuermeyer FX, et al. Prehospital sodium bicarbonate use could worsen long-term survival with favorable neurological recovery among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;119:63-69. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.008</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Y’all have had lots of questions about using sodium bicarbonate in cardiac arrest after we ran an interview with Dr. Menegazzi about an abstract he presented showing a benefit with bicarb. You wanted more, so here it is! Dr. Jarvis reviews a paper from British Columbia from 2017 that looks at just this thing!</p><p><br>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.<br>Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe to the FlightBridgeED channel.</p><p><br>Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at:<br>Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis</p><p><br>Citations:<br>1. Kawano T, Grunau B, Scheuermeyer FX, et al. Prehospital sodium bicarbonate use could worsen long-term survival with favorable neurological recovery among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;119:63-69. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.008</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 18:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2f67e89a/da4c0397.mp3" length="13446071" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/X5yFOusPLCYTgbeUMcHn7fjan9BUKmheZjy2y0hhQeA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTUv/MTY5MDEyNjMxNC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>836</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Y’all have had lots of questions about using sodium bicarbonate in cardiac arrest after we ran an interview with Dr. Menegazzi about an abstract he presented showing a benefit with bicarb. You wanted more, so here it is! Dr. Jarvis reviews a paper from British Columbia from 2017 that looks at just this thing!</p><p><br>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.<br>Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe to the FlightBridgeED channel.</p><p><br>Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at:<br>Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis</p><p><br>Citations:<br>1. Kawano T, Grunau B, Scheuermeyer FX, et al. Prehospital sodium bicarbonate use could worsen long-term survival with favorable neurological recovery among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;119:63-69. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.008</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP - E58 - Pediatric Pain</title>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>58</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP - E58 - Pediatric Pain</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a412edcb-6b6e-406f-8bcc-ae96013eb761</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/be0d06c3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join us for a joint release of the first episode of The Pediatric EMS Podcast. We collaborated with the great folks from the PEC podcast and MedicMindset to introduce this new podcast. We discuss the assessment and management of pediatric pain.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join us for a joint release of the first episode of The Pediatric EMS Podcast. We collaborated with the great folks from the PEC podcast and MedicMindset to introduce this new podcast. We discuss the assessment and management of pediatric pain.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/be0d06c3/d1526ec6.mp3" length="54639639" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_D2R9JEcgeBfWnBEqBXyWJwwM5Vbk1xOYVi8vh5Vs1Y/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTMv/MTY5MDEyNjMwOS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3412</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Join us for a joint release of the first episode of The Pediatric EMS Podcast. We collaborated with the great folks from the PEC podcast and MedicMindset to introduce this new podcast. We discuss the assessment and management of pediatric pain.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP – Episode 56 – Atrial Fibrillation Treatment</title>
      <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>56</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP – Episode 56 – Atrial Fibrillation Treatment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6c80ab20-4b77-4c72-a699-ae6000254037</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c80cbc30</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do y'all treat a-fib? Have you wondered what the best method of rate control is? Should you use diltiazem or metoprolol? How about the best pad placement for electrical Cardioversion? Should you go anterior-posterior or anterior-lateral? Great questions! Dr. Jarvis reviews two recent papers to help shed the bright light of science on these two questions.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do y'all treat a-fib? Have you wondered what the best method of rate control is? Should you use diltiazem or metoprolol? How about the best pad placement for electrical Cardioversion? Should you go anterior-posterior or anterior-lateral? Great questions! Dr. Jarvis reviews two recent papers to help shed the bright light of science on these two questions.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/c80cbc30/0049e0d9.mp3" length="29620053" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/afAkXyirpantpnfX6tIUwR1O_18vLaUH3TEVQRMtAKw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTIv/MTY5MDEyNjMwNC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1848</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do y'all treat a-fib? Have you wondered what the best method of rate control is? Should you use diltiazem or metoprolol? How about the best pad placement for electrical Cardioversion? Should you go anterior-posterior or anterior-lateral? Great questions! Dr. Jarvis reviews two recent papers to help shed the bright light of science on these two questions.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS LHP – Episode 55 – Research from NAEMSP 2022 – Part 2</title>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>55</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS LHP – Episode 55 – Research from NAEMSP 2022 – Part 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60412e92-d79a-47c3-b2f8-ae510110fedd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/cb552c1d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’re back with the second part of our interviews with researchers from the NAEMSP 2022 conference in San Diego. In this episode, Dr. Jarvis interviews Dr. Brian Miller from Fort Worth, Texas, about his work on “MCD Walk,” i.e., the case of the migratory Lucas device, Dr. Sarah Frances McClure from UT San Antonio about the impact of EMS leadership engagement on a medic’s decision to get vaccinated against COVID-19, and finally Dr. Jim Menegazzi from Pitt about sodium bicarb in EMS Witnessed cardiac arrest.</p><p>Abstracts:</p><p>“MCD Walk” – Mechanical Compression Device Migration Leading to Inadequate Compression Depth.</p><p>Kerby Johnson, BS, NRP</p><p>William Gleason, BS, LP</p><p>Brian Miller, MD, FACEP, FAEMS</p><p>Veer Vithalani, MD, FACEP, FAEMS</p><p>Office of the Medical Director, Metropolitan Area EMS Authority, Fort Worth, Texas</p><p> </p><p>EMS Leadership Presence Positively Influences EMS Provider’s Decision to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine</p><p>Sarah Frances McClure, DO, FAWM, NRP</p><p>Bryan Everitt, MD, NRP</p><p>Mark Sparkman, MD</p><p>David Wampler, PhD, LP</p><p>Courtney Wenzell, EMT-P</p><p>University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Dept of Emergency Medicine &amp; San Antonio FD</p><p> </p><p>Sodium Bicarbonate Use in EMS-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest</p><p>Sara M. Niederberger</p><p>Remle Crowe, PhD, EMT</p><p>David D. Salcido, PhD</p><p>James J. Menegazzi, PhD</p><p>University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Dept of Emergency Medicine, &amp; ESO</p><p> </p><p>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p> </p><p>Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel.</p><p> </p><p>Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at:</p><p><a href="mailto:Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com">Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com</a> or @DrJeffJarvis</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’re back with the second part of our interviews with researchers from the NAEMSP 2022 conference in San Diego. In this episode, Dr. Jarvis interviews Dr. Brian Miller from Fort Worth, Texas, about his work on “MCD Walk,” i.e., the case of the migratory Lucas device, Dr. Sarah Frances McClure from UT San Antonio about the impact of EMS leadership engagement on a medic’s decision to get vaccinated against COVID-19, and finally Dr. Jim Menegazzi from Pitt about sodium bicarb in EMS Witnessed cardiac arrest.</p><p>Abstracts:</p><p>“MCD Walk” – Mechanical Compression Device Migration Leading to Inadequate Compression Depth.</p><p>Kerby Johnson, BS, NRP</p><p>William Gleason, BS, LP</p><p>Brian Miller, MD, FACEP, FAEMS</p><p>Veer Vithalani, MD, FACEP, FAEMS</p><p>Office of the Medical Director, Metropolitan Area EMS Authority, Fort Worth, Texas</p><p> </p><p>EMS Leadership Presence Positively Influences EMS Provider’s Decision to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine</p><p>Sarah Frances McClure, DO, FAWM, NRP</p><p>Bryan Everitt, MD, NRP</p><p>Mark Sparkman, MD</p><p>David Wampler, PhD, LP</p><p>Courtney Wenzell, EMT-P</p><p>University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Dept of Emergency Medicine &amp; San Antonio FD</p><p> </p><p>Sodium Bicarbonate Use in EMS-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest</p><p>Sara M. Niederberger</p><p>Remle Crowe, PhD, EMT</p><p>David D. Salcido, PhD</p><p>James J. Menegazzi, PhD</p><p>University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Dept of Emergency Medicine, &amp; ESO</p><p> </p><p>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p> </p><p>Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel.</p><p> </p><p>Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at:</p><p><a href="mailto:Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com">Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com</a> or @DrJeffJarvis</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/cb552c1d/579c646a.mp3" length="28155740" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/qsYEv3whzFh7FmS1zx65nvoRSNZlxMunNxxICVn7TYQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTEv/MTY5MDEyNjI5OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1755</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’re back with the second part of our interviews with researchers from the NAEMSP 2022 conference in San Diego. In this episode, Dr. Jarvis interviews Dr. Brian Miller from Fort Worth, Texas, about his work on “MCD Walk,” i.e., the case of the migratory Lucas device, Dr. Sarah Frances McClure from UT San Antonio about the impact of EMS leadership engagement on a medic’s decision to get vaccinated against COVID-19, and finally Dr. Jim Menegazzi from Pitt about sodium bicarb in EMS Witnessed cardiac arrest.</p><p>Abstracts:</p><p>“MCD Walk” – Mechanical Compression Device Migration Leading to Inadequate Compression Depth.</p><p>Kerby Johnson, BS, NRP</p><p>William Gleason, BS, LP</p><p>Brian Miller, MD, FACEP, FAEMS</p><p>Veer Vithalani, MD, FACEP, FAEMS</p><p>Office of the Medical Director, Metropolitan Area EMS Authority, Fort Worth, Texas</p><p> </p><p>EMS Leadership Presence Positively Influences EMS Provider’s Decision to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine</p><p>Sarah Frances McClure, DO, FAWM, NRP</p><p>Bryan Everitt, MD, NRP</p><p>Mark Sparkman, MD</p><p>David Wampler, PhD, LP</p><p>Courtney Wenzell, EMT-P</p><p>University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Dept of Emergency Medicine &amp; San Antonio FD</p><p> </p><p>Sodium Bicarbonate Use in EMS-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest</p><p>Sara M. Niederberger</p><p>Remle Crowe, PhD, EMT</p><p>David D. Salcido, PhD</p><p>James J. Menegazzi, PhD</p><p>University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Dept of Emergency Medicine, &amp; ESO</p><p> </p><p>If you like the show, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p> </p><p>Did you know our podcast is on YouTube, too? Check us out and subscribe on the FlightBridgeED channel.</p><p> </p><p>Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at:</p><p><a href="mailto:Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com">Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com</a> or @DrJeffJarvis</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 54 – NAEMSP Research Part I</title>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>54</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 54 – NAEMSP Research Part I</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a35bf19-e177-444e-a38e-7796ee8c3cc7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1b75974d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>NAEMSP in Sunny San Diego… Just. SO. MUCH. GREAT. RESEARCH. Dr. Jarvis interviewed a small sample of the great work presented. There was so much we broke it into two parts. This episode features interviews with Dr. Amber Rice from Tucson, Arizona, discussing a secondary analysis of the EPIC trial looking further into the impact of hypotension on TBI, Dr. Veer Vithalani from MedStar in Fort Worth, TX discussing how he used his CAD and ePCR data to determine which calls could safely get a BLS response, Dr. Erin Lincoln from Austin discussing her work on disparities in analgesia, and Dr. Henry Wang on his latest secondary analysis of the PART trial, this one looking at the impact of airway type (LT or ET) on ventilatory rates.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>NAEMSP in Sunny San Diego… Just. SO. MUCH. GREAT. RESEARCH. Dr. Jarvis interviewed a small sample of the great work presented. There was so much we broke it into two parts. This episode features interviews with Dr. Amber Rice from Tucson, Arizona, discussing a secondary analysis of the EPIC trial looking further into the impact of hypotension on TBI, Dr. Veer Vithalani from MedStar in Fort Worth, TX discussing how he used his CAD and ePCR data to determine which calls could safely get a BLS response, Dr. Erin Lincoln from Austin discussing her work on disparities in analgesia, and Dr. Henry Wang on his latest secondary analysis of the PART trial, this one looking at the impact of airway type (LT or ET) on ventilatory rates.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/1b75974d/01b343be.mp3" length="46884802" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/oEA7zcJJeeUY232ZIu08MLOrEvvNdIoncpyrPGWvbyY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzOTAv/MTY5MDEyNjI5My1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2926</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 54</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 54</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast: Episode 53 - Calcium in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest</title>
      <itunes:episode>53</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>53</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast: Episode 53 - Calcium in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e1b7cd3-1c6c-428d-b17a-bfb25fcc9ec5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2fc3ec04</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Are you still giving Calcium in undifferentiated cardiac arrests? Not those with hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia… you know, when it’s actually indicated. Be honest, now… nobody’s looking. If you are, join us for this episode, where we review a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of calcium vs placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Are you still giving Calcium in undifferentiated cardiac arrests? Not those with hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia… you know, when it’s actually indicated. Be honest, now… nobody’s looking. If you are, join us for this episode, where we review a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of calcium vs placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2fc3ec04/4e1de019.mp3" length="13936687" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/VOf2zMnqTEPU_9PzzADYz8xSkaZtFBuPOM9L27un5_E/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODkv/MTY5MDEyNjI4Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>868</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Are you still giving Calcium in undifferentiated cardiac arrests? Not those with hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia… you know, when it’s actually indicated. Be honest, now… nobody’s looking. If you are, join us for this episode, where we review a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of calcium vs placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 52 – The BOUGIE Trial</title>
      <itunes:episode>52</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>52</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 52 – The BOUGIE Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24b727df-d02f-4908-a5e2-35ce23e91ef8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1c60708d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you even bougie, bro? Do you use the bougie on every intubation? If so, why? Do you think it improves first-pass success? Well, I certainly did. At least before this trial was released. Join me to discuss this randomized controlled trial of bougie vs no bougie for intubation. I suspect the results will surprise you!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you even bougie, bro? Do you use the bougie on every intubation? If so, why? Do you think it improves first-pass success? Well, I certainly did. At least before this trial was released. Join me to discuss this randomized controlled trial of bougie vs no bougie for intubation. I suspect the results will surprise you!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/1c60708d/315defb5.mp3" length="30081001" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/qKtfSSyjTLb4hqz9It98PmP3Kx3iQUFjDHg1a0kojSA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODgv/MTY5MDEyNjI4Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1878</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 52</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 52</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 51 – Abstracts from PCRF at EMS Expo 2021 - Part 2</title>
      <itunes:episode>51</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>51</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 51 – Abstracts from PCRF at EMS Expo 2021 - Part 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">feabe9ef-17b1-4eb5-8003-7f7dc91ff185</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/dcff36be</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest return for part 2 of our interviews with some great researchers at the Prehospital Care Research Forum at the EMS Expo in Atlanta. In this episode, we interview Kevin Collopy on his RCT comparing ketamine and etomidate for RSI, Sean McAllister on Sepsis using the ESO dataset, and David Page about PCRF and his work on comparing Mexican and American EMT training. If you like the show, please give us a like on YouTube and a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest return for part 2 of our interviews with some great researchers at the Prehospital Care Research Forum at the EMS Expo in Atlanta. In this episode, we interview Kevin Collopy on his RCT comparing ketamine and etomidate for RSI, Sean McAllister on Sepsis using the ESO dataset, and David Page about PCRF and his work on comparing Mexican and American EMT training. If you like the show, please give us a like on YouTube and a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/dcff36be/d9001e85.mp3" length="58560930" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/jkrjgQ6OXxgXKmlnj9CBBTL5_S-X4n-K-Jh5UxCIoA4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODcv/MTY5MDEyNjI3Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3657</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 51</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 51</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 50 – PCRF Research Abstracts from EMS Expo – Part I</title>
      <itunes:episode>50</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>50</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 50 – PCRF Research Abstracts from EMS Expo – Part I</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e126c36-8a7a-42bb-b537-f0bcd41d88ad</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/02f4e2f4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest were at the EMS Expo in Atlanta. We recorded some interviews from the FlightbridgeED booth on the exhibitor floor and then discussed them when Mike stopped by Casa Jarvis in Austin a bit later. There was so much goodness that we broke it up into two different episodes to keep these at a reasonable length.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest were at the EMS Expo in Atlanta. We recorded some interviews from the FlightbridgeED booth on the exhibitor floor and then discussed them when Mike stopped by Casa Jarvis in Austin a bit later. There was so much goodness that we broke it up into two different episodes to keep these at a reasonable length.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/02f4e2f4/514e99bd.mp3" length="37664450" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/dr0i4Gt-OxZITk5xDF2w1b77_TPljNE_BbNTD9XXjSI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODYv/MTY5MDEyNjI3Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2351</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 50</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 50</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 49 – The RACKED Trial, with Dr. Barbic</title>
      <itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>49</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 49 – The RACKED Trial, with Dr. Barbic</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6d889ed-94d4-43e0-85c5-bf1961e7b6fe</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/48734cf9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ketamine has been getting a lot of attention recently in the media. It's probably safe to say it’s had a bad year. We like ketamine. We felt bad it’s been having a rough year so we wanted to do something that would lift its spirits. Fortunately, Dr. David Barbic and his colleagues from Vancouver, BC published a wonderful, randomized trial comparing ketamine to a combination of haloperidol plus midazolam for undifferentiated agitation in the ED. This was the amazingly titled RACKED trial (Rapid Agitation Control with Ketamine in the ED). It has direct and important implications for EMS and is something all emergency providers should know about. Dr. Jarvis reviews the trial and then invites Dr. Barbic himself on the show to discuss this study. If you like the show, please give us a like on YouTube and a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ketamine has been getting a lot of attention recently in the media. It's probably safe to say it’s had a bad year. We like ketamine. We felt bad it’s been having a rough year so we wanted to do something that would lift its spirits. Fortunately, Dr. David Barbic and his colleagues from Vancouver, BC published a wonderful, randomized trial comparing ketamine to a combination of haloperidol plus midazolam for undifferentiated agitation in the ED. This was the amazingly titled RACKED trial (Rapid Agitation Control with Ketamine in the ED). It has direct and important implications for EMS and is something all emergency providers should know about. Dr. Jarvis reviews the trial and then invites Dr. Barbic himself on the show to discuss this study. If you like the show, please give us a like on YouTube and a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/48734cf9/ada2b539.mp3" length="71242216" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/3nvdi-enP2tn_lXvzUdu1zJRhGdMNEO-q-Bv2iO1loM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODUv/MTY5MDEyNjI2Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4448</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 49</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 49</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 48 – Airway Updates from NEAR</title>
      <itunes:episode>48</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>48</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 48 – Airway Updates from NEAR</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83beea7f-057e-4e64-a35e-f4a7de14bee4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c34742c1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mike and Jeff meet to discuss some airway papers from the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) and float some merch ideas. If you like the show, please give us a like on YouTube and a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at: Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mike and Jeff meet to discuss some airway papers from the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) and float some merch ideas. If you like the show, please give us a like on YouTube and a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts. Drop your questions/comments/suggestions for future pods at: Jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/c34742c1/5c149da9.mp3" length="48574661" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/XHHlBElSQN9Jbk1hbgbVvwivS0u0khejM7KZIxY8RKQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODQv/MTY5MDEyNjI2Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3032</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 48</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 48</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 47 – ETI Attempts and Outcomes in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest</title>
      <itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>47</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 47 – ETI Attempts and Outcomes in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">becce53f-a1f7-49c9-a4d2-f64e8bb15199</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4ff1b65f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr. Jarvis discusses a paper that is hot off the press, and he’s excited to discuss it. The good folks up in Seattle, WA, and the Seattle FD looked at their cardiac arrest survival rates as a function of the number of intubation attempts needed to secure the airway. Results from this trial might help explain the 2.9% improved survival with King LT vs ETI that we saw in the PART trial. Join us to hear all the juicy details. As always, if you like the pod, give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your pods. If you have any questions, drop us a note: jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis. You can also follow the pod on Twitter @EMSLighthouseProject.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr. Jarvis discusses a paper that is hot off the press, and he’s excited to discuss it. The good folks up in Seattle, WA, and the Seattle FD looked at their cardiac arrest survival rates as a function of the number of intubation attempts needed to secure the airway. Results from this trial might help explain the 2.9% improved survival with King LT vs ETI that we saw in the PART trial. Join us to hear all the juicy details. As always, if you like the pod, give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your pods. If you have any questions, drop us a note: jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com or @DrJeffJarvis. You can also follow the pod on Twitter @EMSLighthouseProject.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4ff1b65f/cece32d5.mp3" length="21800750" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/wCSXzGLEG0dDIgRQqX1ZxK3NnkjAO5-mOd46Rdbl5aI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODMv/MTY5MDEyNjI1Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1359</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 47</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 47</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 46: 2020 EMS LLSA Review with Dr. Casey Patrick</title>
      <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>46</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 46: 2020 EMS LLSA Review with Dr. Casey Patrick</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">778309d9-51c0-4e7b-96ce-a98f55d55320</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/553c73d8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Every other year, board-certified EMS physicians must take an open book quiz over 20-25 papers felt by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) to be something all EMS physicians should know. Dr. Jarvis and Dr. Casey Patrick (@cpatrick_89) from Montgomery County Health District EMS gave a lecture reviewing the 2020 ABEM EMS LLSA articles at the Texas Chapter of NAEMSP meeting. We got together right after our lecture to record this podcast, going over these articles. Join us from the Cavalier Room at the Historic Menger Hotel (@mengerhotel) in downtown San Antonio, literally next door to the Alamo.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Every other year, board-certified EMS physicians must take an open book quiz over 20-25 papers felt by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) to be something all EMS physicians should know. Dr. Jarvis and Dr. Casey Patrick (@cpatrick_89) from Montgomery County Health District EMS gave a lecture reviewing the 2020 ABEM EMS LLSA articles at the Texas Chapter of NAEMSP meeting. We got together right after our lecture to record this podcast, going over these articles. Join us from the Cavalier Room at the Historic Menger Hotel (@mengerhotel) in downtown San Antonio, literally next door to the Alamo.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/553c73d8/c399c2ff.mp3" length="74157432" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/4NRwr-0lDSfWYQ472CcUf7XxEBdEiNt0gGUR5fF-99I/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODIv/MTY5MDEyNjI1MS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4630</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 46</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 46</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 45: ESO Ketamine Paperfrom Eagles</title>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>45</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 45: ESO Ketamine Paperfrom Eagles</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a49c4a54-e6a9-4edb-8833-9d7737457f79</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/986f2c15</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ketamine is a wonder drug. Ketamine is a tool of systemic racism. Ketamine is impossible to overdose. Ketamine is an inappropriate drug used for inappropriate purposes. So much controversy. What should we believe? When in doubt, follow the data. Dr. Jeff Jarvis reviews a very timely paper just released in Annals of Emergency Medicine using the 2019 Data Collaborative data set that aims to describe the characteristics of patients getting ketamine as well as the potential deaths associated with it. As a bonus, Drs. Remle Crowe and Brent Myers join Dr. Jarvis for an interview about their paper and the controversies surrounding ketamine use.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ketamine is a wonder drug. Ketamine is a tool of systemic racism. Ketamine is impossible to overdose. Ketamine is an inappropriate drug used for inappropriate purposes. So much controversy. What should we believe? When in doubt, follow the data. Dr. Jeff Jarvis reviews a very timely paper just released in Annals of Emergency Medicine using the 2019 Data Collaborative data set that aims to describe the characteristics of patients getting ketamine as well as the potential deaths associated with it. As a bonus, Drs. Remle Crowe and Brent Myers join Dr. Jarvis for an interview about their paper and the controversies surrounding ketamine use.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/986f2c15/cf8b2058.mp3" length="82752610" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/zsAU_JkKXhZ2rdNRZVOKBq2WkmxWwgfRybKL_0ISbE8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODEv/MTY5MDEyNjI0Ni1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>5168</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 45</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 45</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 44: OHCA Update from Bend, OR</title>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>44</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 44: OHCA Update from Bend, OR</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c02a1a1c-ed34-462b-b001-d7108dd9e138</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d40b79d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What is the impact of on-scene resuscitation vs intra-arrest transport on outcomes? Could the differences in first-pass success between ETI and King LT have accounted for the differences in outcome in the PART trial? How about differences in compression interruptions? In this episode recorded on the road in Bend, Oregon, Dr. Jarvis reviews three new papers addressing these questions. He then interviewed Petar and Amber Hossick about how Bend Fire Rescue has implemented tenets of improvement science to impact survival in their community.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What is the impact of on-scene resuscitation vs intra-arrest transport on outcomes? Could the differences in first-pass success between ETI and King LT have accounted for the differences in outcome in the PART trial? How about differences in compression interruptions? In this episode recorded on the road in Bend, Oregon, Dr. Jarvis reviews three new papers addressing these questions. He then interviewed Petar and Amber Hossick about how Bend Fire Rescue has implemented tenets of improvement science to impact survival in their community.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2d40b79d/3b44232d.mp3" length="44424314" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/e52n51dYVCzk2wGQSdHQ2R41W-j4FF1hs1bEdrmCTyo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzODAv/MTY5MDEyNjI0MS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2771</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 44</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 44</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 43: mRNA Vaccines – Real World Efficacy</title>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>43</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 43: mRNA Vaccines – Real World Efficacy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da683b88-255e-404a-9e7b-ec0719fc01f4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/48382e19</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We saw the amazing performance of Pfizer and Moderna's two mRNA COVID vaccines in their RCTs. As encouraging as trial performance is, we always want to know how those numbers hold up under large-scale, real-world pragmatic conditions. Well, we now have three new pieces of information on that. And, for the cherry on top, we get evidence of performance against asymptomatic infection! Dr. Jarvis does a quick review of the latest evidence on vaccine performance.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We saw the amazing performance of Pfizer and Moderna's two mRNA COVID vaccines in their RCTs. As encouraging as trial performance is, we always want to know how those numbers hold up under large-scale, real-world pragmatic conditions. Well, we now have three new pieces of information on that. And, for the cherry on top, we get evidence of performance against asymptomatic infection! Dr. Jarvis does a quick review of the latest evidence on vaccine performance.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/48382e19/a2d89e0a.mp3" length="16383525" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/JpGz-Byk1432IawkHLnHllw-Dqrdr5pCm6YNRorv_9U/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzkv/MTY5MDEyNjIzNS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1020</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 43</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 43</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 42: Droperidol Black Box Warning</title>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>42</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 42: Droperidol Black Box Warning</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e67af706-b256-4502-8def-f1af99d1fecf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/025b1a1f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>December 4, 2001. A bad day, indeed. That’s the day the FDA issued a black box warning for droperidol, citing evidence of QT prolongation, Torsades de Pointes, and death. This was a surprise warning because droperidol had been extensively used by emergency medicine and anesthesiology for decades without apparent problems. Since this bad day, we’ve essentially been without droperidol. Fortunately, it’s back! Before we use it again, we should look at what got this drug on the FDA’s radar. Dr. Jarvis reviews the literature about the “evidence” behind the warning and describes how his systems will be bringing droperidol back into practice.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>December 4, 2001. A bad day, indeed. That’s the day the FDA issued a black box warning for droperidol, citing evidence of QT prolongation, Torsades de Pointes, and death. This was a surprise warning because droperidol had been extensively used by emergency medicine and anesthesiology for decades without apparent problems. Since this bad day, we’ve essentially been without droperidol. Fortunately, it’s back! Before we use it again, we should look at what got this drug on the FDA’s radar. Dr. Jarvis reviews the literature about the “evidence” behind the warning and describes how his systems will be bringing droperidol back into practice.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/025b1a1f/1f33bc87.mp3" length="22593137" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/iQcBpbnHbSQkZ-SNcTNvMWy8BmaBqEJPSMzZnjJsumQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzgv/MTY5MDEyNjIzMC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1407</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 42</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 42</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 41: Breaking News: Johnson and Johnson COVID Vaccine</title>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>41</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 41: Breaking News: Johnson and Johnson COVID Vaccine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6cc2e149-77f8-42a4-93bd-eb429b1cd114</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b238f8f7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The FDA just granted EUA for the Johnson and Johnson vaccine against COVID. This is a big deal because it is a one-shot vaccination that is much more stable than the two mRNA vaccines. Dr. Jarvis provides a quick overview of the data submitted to the FDA for approval.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The FDA just granted EUA for the Johnson and Johnson vaccine against COVID. This is a big deal because it is a one-shot vaccination that is much more stable than the two mRNA vaccines. Dr. Jarvis provides a quick overview of the data submitted to the FDA for approval.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/b238f8f7/a0d2d06e.mp3" length="15481182" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/dzJcuxuziZ0VfZ-JqNCFKkvwX3ix4_pvRXY_WyFNuqA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzcv/MTY5MDEyNjIyNS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>963</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 41</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 41</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bonus Episode: Medical Directors Gone Wild, Part Deux</title>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>40</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Bonus Episode: Medical Directors Gone Wild, Part Deux</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef32c75a-5a47-44a4-9ad5-8f64eee70487</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e9f32032</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>LIVE from a virtual Texas EMS Conference; we bring you a session moderated by Mike featuring Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Jason Pickett, and Heidi Abraham. This is the highly anticipated Part Deux of a session we all did at the Texas EMS Conference in Fort Worth in 2019… back before “the situation” when we could all meet in person like civilized humans. We discussed various topics, including the new DEA rules about controlled substances, the latest AHA guidelines, and many other goodies. But mostly, we just had fun.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>LIVE from a virtual Texas EMS Conference; we bring you a session moderated by Mike featuring Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Jason Pickett, and Heidi Abraham. This is the highly anticipated Part Deux of a session we all did at the Texas EMS Conference in Fort Worth in 2019… back before “the situation” when we could all meet in person like civilized humans. We discussed various topics, including the new DEA rules about controlled substances, the latest AHA guidelines, and many other goodies. But mostly, we just had fun.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/e9f32032/c96b115d.mp3" length="45428843" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/AakKz8h125dznFy9vJhNLBmqcbIsnR26D3HyOTt63E8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzYv/MTY5MDEyNjIyMC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2835</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bonus Episode</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bonus Episode</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 39: Ketamine Only Intubation: Next Great Thing or Procedure In Search of an Indication?</title>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>39</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 39: Ketamine Only Intubation: Next Great Thing or Procedure In Search of an Indication?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">814b70a2-37fa-43bb-a5d5-2464108d20ad</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2180a531</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ketamine-only intubation has been promoted by some as a safe approach to airway management in patients with anatomically or physiologically difficult airways. It turns out Dr. Jarvis has some thoughts on the subject. He uses a 2020 paper by Dr. Driver entitled “Success and Complications of the Ketamine-Only Intubation Method in the Emergency Department” to discuss this concept. </p><p>If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. All of our podcasts are now also released in video format on the FlightbridgeED YouTube channel. Take a look, subscribe, and give us a ‘thumbs up.’ </p><p>As always, we want to hear your feedback and questions/comments. You can reach us at @DrJeffJarvis or jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com. </p><p>Thanks y’all!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ketamine-only intubation has been promoted by some as a safe approach to airway management in patients with anatomically or physiologically difficult airways. It turns out Dr. Jarvis has some thoughts on the subject. He uses a 2020 paper by Dr. Driver entitled “Success and Complications of the Ketamine-Only Intubation Method in the Emergency Department” to discuss this concept. </p><p>If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. All of our podcasts are now also released in video format on the FlightbridgeED YouTube channel. Take a look, subscribe, and give us a ‘thumbs up.’ </p><p>As always, we want to hear your feedback and questions/comments. You can reach us at @DrJeffJarvis or jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com. </p><p>Thanks y’all!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2180a531/7d97589a.mp3" length="16140202" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/ksU8Ov_C3lDy-3spFgz2rmG788F81RCVZjyl20QdcSU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzUv/MTY5MDEyNjIxNC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1005</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 39</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 39</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 38: Pediatric Intubation: Are Children Just Small Adults?</title>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>38</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 38: Pediatric Intubation: Are Children Just Small Adults?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2489fe2d-fae3-43e2-9ce7-6c5c2d112e42</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5ec5891f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Children are often considered to be just small adults, much to the dismay of pediatricians everywhere. But when it comes to peri-intubation cardiac arrest, is it true? We know that, in adults, peri-intubation hypoxia is a strong predictor of cardiac arrest. Is this true in pediatric patients?</p><p>This episode features another oral board case with Dr. Erin Lincoln (@ErinTWL) and a live discussion with Mike (@MikeVerkest), Jeff (@DrJeffJarvis), and special guest Dr. Peter Antevy (@HandtevyMD). Our live segment had lots of great listener questions, which led Peter and Jeff to explore safe intubation practices in depth. </p><p>If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. All of our podcasts are now also released in video format on the FlightbridgeED YouTube channel. Take a look, subscribe, and give us a ‘thumbs up.’ </p><p>As always, we want to hear your feedback and questions/comments. You can reach us at @DrJeffJarvis or jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Children are often considered to be just small adults, much to the dismay of pediatricians everywhere. But when it comes to peri-intubation cardiac arrest, is it true? We know that, in adults, peri-intubation hypoxia is a strong predictor of cardiac arrest. Is this true in pediatric patients?</p><p>This episode features another oral board case with Dr. Erin Lincoln (@ErinTWL) and a live discussion with Mike (@MikeVerkest), Jeff (@DrJeffJarvis), and special guest Dr. Peter Antevy (@HandtevyMD). Our live segment had lots of great listener questions, which led Peter and Jeff to explore safe intubation practices in depth. </p><p>If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating wherever you get your podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. All of our podcasts are now also released in video format on the FlightbridgeED YouTube channel. Take a look, subscribe, and give us a ‘thumbs up.’ </p><p>As always, we want to hear your feedback and questions/comments. You can reach us at @DrJeffJarvis or jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/5ec5891f/d2a6b43f.mp3" length="101338918" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/IA_NE745YK7t5gldIMaxxfMHrouZFHN_FDFVUNvXF9E/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzQv/MTY5MDEyNjIwOS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>6331</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 38</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 38</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Special Episode: mRNA Literature Review</title>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>38</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Special Episode: mRNA Literature Review</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">058d1481-202b-43ae-a94a-6b7a6bddf9ac</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8e088a82</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest are joined by a trio of guests to discuss the literature surrounding the Pfizer BionTech and Moderna Vaccines. Dr. Ritu Sahni, Dr. Veer Vithilani, and Dr. Remle Crowe round out the panel. This episode is nearly two hours in length, and we hope we answered any questions you might have in a non-biased way. Feel free to share this episode or any of the mRNA series of podcasts and live broadcasts we have done this month. We appreciate you listening.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest are joined by a trio of guests to discuss the literature surrounding the Pfizer BionTech and Moderna Vaccines. Dr. Ritu Sahni, Dr. Veer Vithilani, and Dr. Remle Crowe round out the panel. This episode is nearly two hours in length, and we hope we answered any questions you might have in a non-biased way. Feel free to share this episode or any of the mRNA series of podcasts and live broadcasts we have done this month. We appreciate you listening.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/8e088a82/eac31602.mp3" length="116909714" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/kdggrKDPDGH3qS1BWi-MxzYtxjke4eDK-SmncwERfzM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzMv/MTY5MDEyNjIwNC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>7304</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bonus Episode</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bonus Episode</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 37: Droperidol, Ziprasidone and Lorazepam in Undifferentiated Agitation</title>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>37</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 37: Droperidol, Ziprasidone and Lorazepam in Undifferentiated Agitation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a38c08e6-402f-4bfb-a298-013dadb7bf40</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/65e5dac0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode was a LIVE media broadcast discussing a double-blind trial of IM Droperidol, Ziprasidone, and Lorazepam for acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department. Join Mike and Jeff as they discuss the paper, take viewers' questions, and tease the newly released Standard of Care Podcast! Thank you for listening, sharing, rating, and reviewing all the FlightBridgeED podcasts! We appreciate you being on this journey with us!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode was a LIVE media broadcast discussing a double-blind trial of IM Droperidol, Ziprasidone, and Lorazepam for acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department. Join Mike and Jeff as they discuss the paper, take viewers' questions, and tease the newly released Standard of Care Podcast! Thank you for listening, sharing, rating, and reviewing all the FlightBridgeED podcasts! We appreciate you being on this journey with us!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/65e5dac0/7729c6d9.mp3" length="53019251" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/3b2P-dnkxnHJB5HLGprYQWhXloxEabJUBrFKpynn7vs/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzIv/MTY5MDEyNjE5OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3311</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 37</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 37</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 36: EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast</title>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>36</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 36: EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e80fd92-fad6-40ba-a9c1-c9253b8a4cee</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9517f6b1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Part pre-recorded, part LIVE! Dr. Jeff Jarvis, Dr. Jason Pickett, and Mike Verkest discuss the results of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium TXA in TBI Trial. Thanks for coming to the channel! Be sure to subscribe here and wherever you listen to podcasts!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Part pre-recorded, part LIVE! Dr. Jeff Jarvis, Dr. Jason Pickett, and Mike Verkest discuss the results of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium TXA in TBI Trial. Thanks for coming to the channel! Be sure to subscribe here and wherever you listen to podcasts!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/9517f6b1/66afac03.mp3" length="66820093" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/uHb8tVu86PjsPrM66h_vXZHfwpCy9Hg2FzNU-i8e8dA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzEv/MTY5MDEyNjE5NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4174</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 36</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 36</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 35: Capsaicin Cream and Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome</title>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>35</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 35: Capsaicin Cream and Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">08e159ed-0a05-4316-a2cd-b89fefa602af</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6d4984af</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you had patients recently with repeat EMS calls and lots of ED visits for nausea and vomiting? They say the only thing that works for them is scalding hot showers and that drug that starts with a "D." Did they happen to smoke a lot of weed? In this episode, Dr. Jarvis discusses cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and reviews an RCT comparing topical capsaicin cream (yes... the stuff of pepper spray fame) vs placebo.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you had patients recently with repeat EMS calls and lots of ED visits for nausea and vomiting? They say the only thing that works for them is scalding hot showers and that drug that starts with a "D." Did they happen to smoke a lot of weed? In this episode, Dr. Jarvis discusses cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and reviews an RCT comparing topical capsaicin cream (yes... the stuff of pepper spray fame) vs placebo.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/6d4984af/f5923ea6.mp3" length="28355490" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/fnRF6YXZIG2RcF2OKu-c3kLso-iy33rRN-usjlofPVI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNzAv/MTY5MDEyNjE4OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1769</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 35</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 35</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 34: LVO and VAN Scores w/ Guests Dr. Wampler and Kidd</title>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>34</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 34: LVO and VAN Scores w/ Guests Dr. Wampler and Kidd</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46521b9e-038a-48e4-9e53-0b55fbb761ad</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7b6c042d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mike and Dr. Jarvis are joined by Drs. David Wampler and Emily Kidd to discuss their study on the performance characteristics of the VAN score for detecting large vessel strokes. Drs. Jarvis and Kidd run through a case of a patient with a stroke to discuss the thought process of an emergency physician.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mike and Dr. Jarvis are joined by Drs. David Wampler and Emily Kidd to discuss their study on the performance characteristics of the VAN score for detecting large vessel strokes. Drs. Jarvis and Kidd run through a case of a patient with a stroke to discuss the thought process of an emergency physician.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/7b6c042d/ab35f068.mp3" length="80872874" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/N5iHg-j7oRtlZozqUvYnCCNVbLEe-OfDCCXHtO2frwY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjkv/MTY5MDEyNjE4NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>5051</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 34</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 34</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 33: Headaches with Special Guest Dr. Erin Lincoln</title>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>33</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 33: Headaches with Special Guest Dr. Erin Lincoln</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5fca5c2b-3fb9-4e4a-ab04-630ea2736a79</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4c84d8af</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We talk about headaches in this episode, specifically an RCT comparing haloperidol to placebo for benign headaches. Special guest Dr. Erin Lincoln (@ErinTWL), EM resident and paramedic, is joining us for this episode. Drs. Jarvis and Lincoln will go through an oral boards-type case of a 45-year-old woman with a headache. We’ll include a review of the literature on headache treatments, hit on why opioids aren’t recommended, and discuss the differential diagnosis of headaches and the red flags that will help find those “can’t miss” diagnoses. This is a new format for us. We want your feedback. Do you like the oral boards-style interview? Drop us a note on Twitter @DrJeffJarvis, or email jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com. And don’t forget to give us a review on Apple Podcasts to help other like-minded clinicians find our show.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We talk about headaches in this episode, specifically an RCT comparing haloperidol to placebo for benign headaches. Special guest Dr. Erin Lincoln (@ErinTWL), EM resident and paramedic, is joining us for this episode. Drs. Jarvis and Lincoln will go through an oral boards-type case of a 45-year-old woman with a headache. We’ll include a review of the literature on headache treatments, hit on why opioids aren’t recommended, and discuss the differential diagnosis of headaches and the red flags that will help find those “can’t miss” diagnoses. This is a new format for us. We want your feedback. Do you like the oral boards-style interview? Drop us a note on Twitter @DrJeffJarvis, or email jeff.jarvis@flightbridgeed.com. And don’t forget to give us a review on Apple Podcasts to help other like-minded clinicians find our show.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4c84d8af/090365b9.mp3" length="67586111" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/RV4e_xgvpYKN2dG44KwULTP-WBRQbNpc_QpsNX50UJ4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjgv/MTY5MDEyNjE3OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4221</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 33</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 33</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 32: Near VL vs. aDL</title>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>32</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 32: Near VL vs. aDL</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51efe676-fba1-4dad-9fdd-d025f43894d5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5e1ba31b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>VL vs. Augmented DL with Special Guest: Dr. George Kovacs. We’re starting a new format with this episode. We kick things off with a review of a paper: Brown CA, et al. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 27: 100-108. After discussing the paper, we have a fantastic interview with Dr. George Kovacs (@kovacsgj) to discuss the differences between types of VL devices. He drops some great pearls on some tips for intubation success. Then Mike joins us for a discussion of the paper and interview. We hope you like the new format. Please drop us a line and let us know what you think! As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>VL vs. Augmented DL with Special Guest: Dr. George Kovacs. We’re starting a new format with this episode. We kick things off with a review of a paper: Brown CA, et al. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 27: 100-108. After discussing the paper, we have a fantastic interview with Dr. George Kovacs (@kovacsgj) to discuss the differences between types of VL devices. He drops some great pearls on some tips for intubation success. Then Mike joins us for a discussion of the paper and interview. We hope you like the new format. Please drop us a line and let us know what you think! As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/5e1ba31b/508315c4.mp3" length="67194890" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/YwA2H696r08QTwRpBih80KbAsh5hREGPkfKoqytbKkQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjcv/MTY5MDEyNjE3NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4196</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 32</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 32</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 31: TXA for Epistaxis</title>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>31</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 31: TXA for Epistaxis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72b6eb56-2996-4219-8542-86dc50ec4e35</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/53116b64</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of talk about the benefits of TXA in major trauma with minor differences in outcomes. If you’re looking for a big treatment benefit for TXA, look no further than the very sexy nose bleeds. This is an easy and safe intervention that EMS can provide that makes a real difference in a growing number of patients. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of talk about the benefits of TXA in major trauma with minor differences in outcomes. If you’re looking for a big treatment benefit for TXA, look no further than the very sexy nose bleeds. This is an easy and safe intervention that EMS can provide that makes a real difference in a growing number of patients. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/53116b64/b3417929.mp3" length="11938224" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Z6IB9dA-c8zmVYnpyB6Ou6bzaDiW2tGm0cTCZ7Rg8dw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjYv/MTY5MDEyNjE2OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>741</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 31</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 31</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 30: COVID Comes to The Nursing Home, With Special Guest Dr. Jason Pickett</title>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>30</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 30: COVID Comes to The Nursing Home, With Special Guest Dr. Jason Pickett</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c5404977-23d6-49e4-8261-e03f3399b3a6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b41a1bd7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Are you worried about what might happen in your jurisdiction if COVID breaks out in your nursing homes? You should be. Dr. Jarvis reviews a NEJM paper in this episode: Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility. Afterward, he’s joined by a special guest, Dr. Jason Pickett. Dr. Pickett is the deputy medical director for Austin-Travis County EMS, assistant local health authority for Austin Public Health, and the host of the EMS podcast with the longest name ever. As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Are you worried about what might happen in your jurisdiction if COVID breaks out in your nursing homes? You should be. Dr. Jarvis reviews a NEJM paper in this episode: Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility. Afterward, he’s joined by a special guest, Dr. Jason Pickett. Dr. Pickett is the deputy medical director for Austin-Travis County EMS, assistant local health authority for Austin Public Health, and the host of the EMS podcast with the longest name ever. As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/b41a1bd7/f8216966.mp3" length="44515322" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/T14mflq7_lcKsKkbxGgK65_dXHXHADcuvUsoOpzjoE4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjUv/MTY5MDEyNjE2NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2777</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 30</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 30</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ep. 29: The Very Special Jarvis COVID Home Party Edition</title>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>29</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ep. 29: The Very Special Jarvis COVID Home Party Edition</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9faf7e99-cd9a-4dd8-8726-7ae7f24540bb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6381af40</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are living in a COVID world. And I am a COVID doc. This is a special episode of the EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast. Since the Jarvis household is quarantined in our bunker in Central Texas, I brought the family together to discuss how such a short piece of RNA has changed our world. Oh, and we talk about the MMWR report from Singapore that, apparently, got the CDC to change its stance on the use of public face masks. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe. Most importantly, stay safe out there. Thank you for stepping up and caring for others in these difficult times. We appreciate each one of you. I’ve never been prouder to be in EMS.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are living in a COVID world. And I am a COVID doc. This is a special episode of the EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast. Since the Jarvis household is quarantined in our bunker in Central Texas, I brought the family together to discuss how such a short piece of RNA has changed our world. Oh, and we talk about the MMWR report from Singapore that, apparently, got the CDC to change its stance on the use of public face masks. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe. Most importantly, stay safe out there. Thank you for stepping up and caring for others in these difficult times. We appreciate each one of you. I’ve never been prouder to be in EMS.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/6381af40/d637ce7d.mp3" length="26806759" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/IPQU98l-6ZMHj5qsqZR6EUru_oBcOhJQCyafSocZa7U/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjQv/MTY5MDEyNjE1OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1670</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 29</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 29</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 28: Does IV vs. IO Matter with Epi?</title>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>28</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 28: Does IV vs. IO Matter with Epi?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ea93bc1-1043-46f2-aa7c-b905788ff174</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7e9e51d3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember our podcast about amiodarone and lidocaine improving survival from arrest when given IV but not IO? Wait! There’s more. Another paper dropped looking at the same thing but with epinephrine instead of anti-dysrhythmics. Does this paper show the same thing? Is there something to this IV superiority thing? Dr. Jarvis breaks this new paper down. As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember our podcast about amiodarone and lidocaine improving survival from arrest when given IV but not IO? Wait! There’s more. Another paper dropped looking at the same thing but with epinephrine instead of anti-dysrhythmics. Does this paper show the same thing? Is there something to this IV superiority thing? Dr. Jarvis breaks this new paper down. As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/7e9e51d3/55d0c95e.mp3" length="21236173" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/hGDvOQmXZKKnuD7hS279URQexZVuQdT_5HnuZ4S3VAs/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjMv/MTY5MDEyNjE1NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1322</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 28</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 28</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DOSE VF Pilot – DSD revisited</title>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>26</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>DOSE VF Pilot – DSD revisited</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">227fa668-f293-40ea-9497-b54e5d74c1f3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/32cbf37b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember Episode 12, where we reviewed a Houston paper on DSD that showed worse outcomes with DSD? At the end of that pod, I spoke about an ongoing RCT trial comparing DSD to standard therapy AND vector change defibrillation. Well, the pilot phase of that trial is over and has JUST been published. It has some surprising preliminary results. Join us and find out how that study is going. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember Episode 12, where we reviewed a Houston paper on DSD that showed worse outcomes with DSD? At the end of that pod, I spoke about an ongoing RCT trial comparing DSD to standard therapy AND vector change defibrillation. Well, the pilot phase of that trial is over and has JUST been published. It has some surprising preliminary results. Join us and find out how that study is going. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/32cbf37b/4da63f29.mp3" length="19115420" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/PqW-T4zaqJy5tGHsobqxOtJqFEQ9S5TVbv6yayDN35U/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjEv/MTY5MDEyNjE0NC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1189</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 27</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 27</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 26: REVERT: A New Approach to An Old Technique</title>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>26</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 26: REVERT: A New Approach to An Old Technique</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b324a49f-a9a7-49a8-8ff9-b0d5c030910b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d8fbb69d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you ever given adenosine to a patient in SVT? Yeah? Did they like it? I didn’t think so. You’ve probably also given up trying to use the Valsalva maneuver because it doesn’t work very often. Wouldn’t it be great if there were a way to make the Valsalva more effective and, perhaps, avoid kicking the patient in the chest with adenosine? Dr. Jarvis reviews a paper in this episode that may offer just this. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you ever given adenosine to a patient in SVT? Yeah? Did they like it? I didn’t think so. You’ve probably also given up trying to use the Valsalva maneuver because it doesn’t work very often. Wouldn’t it be great if there were a way to make the Valsalva more effective and, perhaps, avoid kicking the patient in the chest with adenosine? Dr. Jarvis reviews a paper in this episode that may offer just this. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/d8fbb69d/0a706530.mp3" length="14974330" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/S3Kh85t2q7qhWkNJPiUh-4Tho_Dpy1oL3PDUu7YCa94/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjIv/MTY5MDEyNjE0OS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>930</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 26</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 26</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 25 NAEMSP 2020, Part 4</title>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>25</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 25 NAEMSP 2020, Part 4</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2e1932a9-d75a-438b-8de5-7c9229595e7c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4144e553</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The final part of our coverage of some of the research from NAEMSP2020 in San Diego. If you missed any of the first three episodes, download them and listen. They were great! In this episode, we wrap up the series with outstanding discussions. We discuss the epidemiology of pediatric trauma activations with San Antonio’s Dr. Craig Cooley and finish up with a discussion with Dr. Henry Wang. Dr. Wang talks to us through an oral abstract he presented here on a secondary analysis looking at the impact of FPS in the PART trial comparing ET and King LT in cardiac arrest. As a bonus, he talked us through the original PART trial, where he was the principal investigator. As always, we want to hear your feedback. Let us know what you think: @DrJeffJarvis and @EMSLigthouse. Subscribe and give us an excellent rating on Apple Podcast.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The final part of our coverage of some of the research from NAEMSP2020 in San Diego. If you missed any of the first three episodes, download them and listen. They were great! In this episode, we wrap up the series with outstanding discussions. We discuss the epidemiology of pediatric trauma activations with San Antonio’s Dr. Craig Cooley and finish up with a discussion with Dr. Henry Wang. Dr. Wang talks to us through an oral abstract he presented here on a secondary analysis looking at the impact of FPS in the PART trial comparing ET and King LT in cardiac arrest. As a bonus, he talked us through the original PART trial, where he was the principal investigator. As always, we want to hear your feedback. Let us know what you think: @DrJeffJarvis and @EMSLigthouse. Subscribe and give us an excellent rating on Apple Podcast.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2020 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4144e553/fd6536be.mp3" length="41478746" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/tatXFrqhSRAFPc9ClMMvE_Py3HRZaitcucQiVfwKx5E/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNjAv/MTY5MDEyNjEzOS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2587</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 25</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 25</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, NAEMSP, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 24 NAEMSP 2020, Part 3</title>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>24</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 24 NAEMSP 2020, Part 3</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a7fb96d2-1424-4132-b9e9-39781f7d7658</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6cf07e1c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>And…we are back for part 3 of our coverage of some of the research from NAEMSP2020 in San Diego. If you missed parts 1 or 2, be sure to download them and listen. They were great! In this episode, we have two great interviews. We talk with Dr. Veer Vithalani of MedStar in Fort Worth, TX, about his work using EtCO2 to detect unrecognized BVM ventilation failures. We also chat with Drs. Casey Patrick and Rob Dickson from Montgomery County Hospital District EMS in Conroe, TX, about push-dose drugs, including epinephrine and nitroglycerin.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>And…we are back for part 3 of our coverage of some of the research from NAEMSP2020 in San Diego. If you missed parts 1 or 2, be sure to download them and listen. They were great! In this episode, we have two great interviews. We talk with Dr. Veer Vithalani of MedStar in Fort Worth, TX, about his work using EtCO2 to detect unrecognized BVM ventilation failures. We also chat with Drs. Casey Patrick and Rob Dickson from Montgomery County Hospital District EMS in Conroe, TX, about push-dose drugs, including epinephrine and nitroglycerin.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/6cf07e1c/17af0731.mp3" length="47655347" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/VE-gHaJmDbCytPovVJGs0R4XYjM0lXAH9PcI0sPfZ0M/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTkv/MTY5MDEyNjEzNC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2973</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 24</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 24</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, NAEMSP, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amiodarone and Lidocaine in Cardiac Arrest – Does the Route Matter?</title>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>23</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Amiodarone and Lidocaine in Cardiac Arrest – Does the Route Matter?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a37dc6bf-69cd-4f26-91fa-2f768c3cbdfa</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/897918a2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What if we told you that neither amiodarone nor lidocaine did any better in cardiac arrest when given by IO? What if we told you neither one improved survival when given by IV? Would you think I was smoking crack? Yeah, I would have thought that, too, until last week. I will quickly recap this important secondary analysis of the ALPS trial. As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse, @FlightBridgeED</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What if we told you that neither amiodarone nor lidocaine did any better in cardiac arrest when given by IO? What if we told you neither one improved survival when given by IV? Would you think I was smoking crack? Yeah, I would have thought that, too, until last week. I will quickly recap this important secondary analysis of the ALPS trial. As always, please subscribe and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts. We’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and suggestions. Join us on Twitter: @DrJeffJarvis, @EMSLighthouse, @FlightBridgeED</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/897918a2/22a3579e.mp3" length="11267894" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/LCy3rOpzHkpOH7bc9LotsGCygxetHxxxktAQCIdVSXI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTgv/MTY5MDEyNjEyOC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>699</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 23</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 23</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, NAEMSP, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAEMSP 2020, Part 2</title>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>NAEMSP 2020, Part 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9a5d45dd-1416-4c09-b83a-dfc69b10b390</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4ad1cab9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>And we’re back for part 2 of our coverage of some of the research from NAEMSP2020 in San Diego. If you missed part 1, be sure to download it and listen. It was great! As always, we want to hear your feedback. Let us know what you think: @DrJeffJarvis and @EMSLightouse. Subscribe and give us an excellent rating on Apple Podcast.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>And we’re back for part 2 of our coverage of some of the research from NAEMSP2020 in San Diego. If you missed part 1, be sure to download it and listen. It was great! As always, we want to hear your feedback. Let us know what you think: @DrJeffJarvis and @EMSLightouse. Subscribe and give us an excellent rating on Apple Podcast.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4ad1cab9/9a62a049.mp3" length="32243916" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/SR7nihR1Tu2LTY705GnJLy2ou58ATsiVlNTLZpHt9bY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTcv/MTY5MDEyNjEyMy1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2010</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 22</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 22</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, NAEMSP, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAEMSP 2020, Part 1</title>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>NAEMSP 2020, Part 1</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e08943b1-3bc7-44c5-854a-e19ea76828fc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/55e05813</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Did y’all make it to NAEMSP 2020 in San Diego? If not, I’m sorry. It was awesome! If you did, you probably had a great time but still missed a lot. There’s just too much going on. Being the research nerds we are, we focused our time on the oral and poster presentations. We interviewed as many investigators as we could. In fact, we recorded more audio than we could fit in one episode. So… we’re cutting them into smaller chunks and will get them out faster than our regular every two-week release schedule. Join us as we sit down (or stand up, as the case may be) for some great interviews from NAEMSP. As always, we want to hear your feedback. Let us know what you think: @DrJeffJarvis and @EMSLightouse. Subscribe and give us an excellent rating on Apple Podcast.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Did y’all make it to NAEMSP 2020 in San Diego? If not, I’m sorry. It was awesome! If you did, you probably had a great time but still missed a lot. There’s just too much going on. Being the research nerds we are, we focused our time on the oral and poster presentations. We interviewed as many investigators as we could. In fact, we recorded more audio than we could fit in one episode. So… we’re cutting them into smaller chunks and will get them out faster than our regular every two-week release schedule. Join us as we sit down (or stand up, as the case may be) for some great interviews from NAEMSP. As always, we want to hear your feedback. Let us know what you think: @DrJeffJarvis and @EMSLightouse. Subscribe and give us an excellent rating on Apple Podcast.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/55e05813/348268c2.mp3" length="39139825" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/QAfgygqtWSk3i8OpCZD0Qopu3mz5W43tlP_tCwKAFkA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTYv/MTY5MDEyNjExOC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2441</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 21</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 21</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, NAEMSP, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The EMS Collaborative Podcast</title>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>20</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The EMS Collaborative Podcast</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5816356c-bbc1-4cee-845e-7a1004ea74bd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4371deda</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>HAPPY NEW YEARS! We hope you are celebrating 2020 at the NAEMSP National Conference in San Diego. In this special episode of the EMS Collaborative, we discuss the wonderful world of Mobile Integrated Health (MIH) and ET3. It's a fascinating conversation filled with MIH history, MIH research, editorials, and, of course, checking to see if Dr. Sahni can qualify for Medicare. Check out this fun, entertaining, and witty podcast today! As always, THANK YOU for listening! Hawnwan Philip Moy MD (@pecpodcast), Scott Goldberg MD, MPH (@EMS_Boston), Jeremiah Escajeda MD, MPH (@jerescajeda), Joelle Donofrio-Odmann DO (@PEMems), Mike Verkest (@MikeVerkest), Ritu Sahni MD (@MD59), Jeffrey Jarvis MD (@DrJeffJarvis), and @FlightBridgeED!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>HAPPY NEW YEARS! We hope you are celebrating 2020 at the NAEMSP National Conference in San Diego. In this special episode of the EMS Collaborative, we discuss the wonderful world of Mobile Integrated Health (MIH) and ET3. It's a fascinating conversation filled with MIH history, MIH research, editorials, and, of course, checking to see if Dr. Sahni can qualify for Medicare. Check out this fun, entertaining, and witty podcast today! As always, THANK YOU for listening! Hawnwan Philip Moy MD (@pecpodcast), Scott Goldberg MD, MPH (@EMS_Boston), Jeremiah Escajeda MD, MPH (@jerescajeda), Joelle Donofrio-Odmann DO (@PEMems), Mike Verkest (@MikeVerkest), Ritu Sahni MD (@MD59), Jeffrey Jarvis MD (@DrJeffJarvis), and @FlightBridgeED!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4371deda/cacac8c8.mp3" length="63395518" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/lyZa24d6n7E246rsVQcFAVR11uPunulIk9biXH3P-44/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTUv/MTY5MDEyNjExMi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3960</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 20</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 20</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, NAEMSP, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 19: Dr. Ben Bobrow Interview</title>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 19: Dr. Ben Bobrow Interview</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9727a51e-1852-4c49-bb44-708d791ec7ba</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ca46e0dc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis had an opportunity to sit with Dr. Ben Bobrow at the Texas EMS Conference. Dr. Bobrow is the chair of Emergency Medicine at UT Houston. During his time in Arizona, Dr. Bobrow was instrumental in studying Traumatic Brain Injury and approaches to improved outcomes in cardiac arrest. If you know about the dangers of hypoxia and hypotension in TBI or the importance of minimally interrupted chest compressions and passive oxygenation in cardiac arrest, you should hear this interview. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jarvis had an opportunity to sit with Dr. Ben Bobrow at the Texas EMS Conference. Dr. Bobrow is the chair of Emergency Medicine at UT Houston. During his time in Arizona, Dr. Bobrow was instrumental in studying Traumatic Brain Injury and approaches to improved outcomes in cardiac arrest. If you know about the dangers of hypoxia and hypotension in TBI or the importance of minimally interrupted chest compressions and passive oxygenation in cardiac arrest, you should hear this interview. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/ca46e0dc/8f690351.mp3" length="31632894" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/wUQ7AkETHfEx4K_LdBNZw47a-C9CczNaiC18-2FyTH0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTQv/MTY5MDEyNjEwOC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1972</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 19</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 19</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 18: Roc vs Succ: The Randomized Control Trial!</title>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 18: Roc vs Succ: The Randomized Control Trial!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ec003e4-b5a0-439d-b921-2ccf30a68936</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3f6f9012</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debate has raged. In this corner, we have our established champion succinylcholine, or, as the oldsters call it, “because we’ve always done it this way.” In that other corner, we have the brash newcomer, rocuronium, or, as the youngsters call it, “OMG… what about the hyperK!.” Wouldn’t you just like an answer? Which is better? SAMU to the (potential) rescue. Our French colleagues published a Randomized Clinical Trial comparing FPS among pre-hospital patients undergoing intubation between succinylcholine and rocuronium. What did they find? Join Dr. Jarvis for a hot-off-the-presses podcast that will give you the down-and-dirty about this trial ON THE DAY IT WAS PUBLISHED! Take THAT Second Shift! If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. As always, we want to hear your feedback. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debate has raged. In this corner, we have our established champion succinylcholine, or, as the oldsters call it, “because we’ve always done it this way.” In that other corner, we have the brash newcomer, rocuronium, or, as the youngsters call it, “OMG… what about the hyperK!.” Wouldn’t you just like an answer? Which is better? SAMU to the (potential) rescue. Our French colleagues published a Randomized Clinical Trial comparing FPS among pre-hospital patients undergoing intubation between succinylcholine and rocuronium. What did they find? Join Dr. Jarvis for a hot-off-the-presses podcast that will give you the down-and-dirty about this trial ON THE DAY IT WAS PUBLISHED! Take THAT Second Shift! If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. As always, we want to hear your feedback. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/3f6f9012/60b6a74a.mp3" length="23924509" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/bVMAEgu9oC_KskOcUHO5kjdE1wNahSRpbKJdB7SW3KU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTMv/MTY5MDEyNjEwMy1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1490</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 18</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 18</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 17: Chillin’ in France with TTM</title>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 17: Chillin’ in France with TTM</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d2b4e7d-078f-49ba-99e6-d6b04d8740fb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/85c6daac</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Should we chill out with the non-shockable cardiac arrests? Another look at targeted temperature management. First, we knew early hypothermia after ROSC saved brains. Then, we learned that doing it in the field didn’t make a difference and that there was no difference between 33C and 36C. This month, the NEJM published the HYPERION trial of non-shockable arrests randomized to hypothermia (33C) or normothermia (37C). If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Should we chill out with the non-shockable cardiac arrests? Another look at targeted temperature management. First, we knew early hypothermia after ROSC saved brains. Then, we learned that doing it in the field didn’t make a difference and that there was no difference between 33C and 36C. This month, the NEJM published the HYPERION trial of non-shockable arrests randomized to hypothermia (33C) or normothermia (37C). If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and other premier podcast purveyors and tell your friends to subscribe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2019 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/85c6daac/89e846a2.mp3" length="24478274" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/0lGxiCj0tY6K75rmA48dUGpEUxapTysQPpKWsJqgYs8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTIv/MTY5MDEyNjA5Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1524</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 17</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 17</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 16: Medical Directors Gone Wild</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 16: Medical Directors Gone Wild</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e13f24d1-7774-4f4f-a10e-4624ba4b83f3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9a4fce5f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>As a special Thanksgiving treat, we bring a “Live” panel discussion featuring Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Jason Pickett, Heidi Abraham, and Taylor Ratcliff. Skillfully (and tactfully) moderated by the awesome Ginger Locke. Recorded 11/26/19 at the Texas EMS Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. Topics include epinephrine and advanced airways in cardiac arrest, paramedic degrees, intubation with paralytics vs. “sedation assisted intubation,” whole blood, IV push nitroglycerine for CHF, POCUS, and discussing clinical errors. This was a ton of fun to record. We hope you enjoy it as much as we did. Happy Thanksgiving! If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As a special Thanksgiving treat, we bring a “Live” panel discussion featuring Drs. Jeff Jarvis, Jason Pickett, Heidi Abraham, and Taylor Ratcliff. Skillfully (and tactfully) moderated by the awesome Ginger Locke. Recorded 11/26/19 at the Texas EMS Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. Topics include epinephrine and advanced airways in cardiac arrest, paramedic degrees, intubation with paralytics vs. “sedation assisted intubation,” whole blood, IV push nitroglycerine for CHF, POCUS, and discussing clinical errors. This was a ton of fun to record. We hope you enjoy it as much as we did. Happy Thanksgiving! If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts and tell your friends to subscribe. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/9a4fce5f/9d8f139e.mp3" length="55388864" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/DUaGVvUezxzaKtF_lwO2xtQRl3AXvqsEMUwfTUKEvdE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTEv/MTY5MDEyNjA5Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3456</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 16</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 16</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 15: Why I Quit The VL Wars</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 15: Why I Quit The VL Wars</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d2a968c7-bd11-4acb-8f68-ed42b89b192e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/beb02a92</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>You’ve all seen it. Most of you have probably taken (or fired) a round or two in it. It’s the Great Twitter "VL vs. DL War." Everyone has their opinion. I certainly did. But now I’ve found peace by retreating from the madness. Ultimately, it’s WAY more about the training than the particular device used. To make his point, Dr. Jarvis reviews a randomized trial comparing AP Advance, CMAC, and King Vision. If you like hearing about the latest EMS research, subscribe to our podcast. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts to help others discover the EMS LightHouse Project Podcast! As always, we want to hear your feedback. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>You’ve all seen it. Most of you have probably taken (or fired) a round or two in it. It’s the Great Twitter "VL vs. DL War." Everyone has their opinion. I certainly did. But now I’ve found peace by retreating from the madness. Ultimately, it’s WAY more about the training than the particular device used. To make his point, Dr. Jarvis reviews a randomized trial comparing AP Advance, CMAC, and King Vision. If you like hearing about the latest EMS research, subscribe to our podcast. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts to help others discover the EMS LightHouse Project Podcast! As always, we want to hear your feedback. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/beb02a92/bd5aa310.mp3" length="21544047" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_40RxEzV8si3A6HC6ZM7Cop31oZHxWFIdbOfT_Iv38Q/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNTAv/MTY5MDEyNjA4Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1342</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 15</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 15</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 14: Research from EMS Expo 2019 with Dr. David Wampler</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 14: Research from EMS Expo 2019 with Dr. David Wampler</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">478ab51f-949b-4c06-8215-91645777f59a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/030772cf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>More and more EMS research is being presented at the PCRF research forum at the EMS Expo. Dr. Jarvis sat with Dr. David Wampler at the EMS Expo 2019 in New Orleans. Dr. Wampler won the award for best research at EMS Expo 2019 for his research comparing inhaled isopropyl alcohol to oral ondansetron for nausea. He also discusses his other two posters. If you like hearing about the latest EMS research, subscribe to our podcast. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts to help others discover the EMS LightHouse Project Podcast! As always, we want to hear your feedback. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>More and more EMS research is being presented at the PCRF research forum at the EMS Expo. Dr. Jarvis sat with Dr. David Wampler at the EMS Expo 2019 in New Orleans. Dr. Wampler won the award for best research at EMS Expo 2019 for his research comparing inhaled isopropyl alcohol to oral ondansetron for nausea. He also discusses his other two posters. If you like hearing about the latest EMS research, subscribe to our podcast. If you like what you hear, please give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts to help others discover the EMS LightHouse Project Podcast! As always, we want to hear your feedback. You can reach us on Twitter at @EMSLighthouse and @DrJeffJarvis.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/030772cf/d7585eba.mp3" length="41450245" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/NPew-bUZVGUTTJpckAjZ2m3ErRFYSPKFa1_pGzbqIQ0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDkv/MTY5MDEyNjA4Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2586</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 14</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 14</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 13: TXA for TBI? CRASH-3</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 13: TXA for TBI? CRASH-3</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ef3a1f0-4d95-4a50-a153-a397f6906f9a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/96c015d9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A variety of papers, including CRASH-2, suggest that TXA can decrease mortality if given early for patients at risk of significant hemorrhage but exclude patients with TBI. CRASH-3 was a large, multi-national, placebo-controlled randomized trial comparing TXA, 1 gm over 10 minutes, followed by a subsequent 1 gm infusion over the next 8 hours. So… what do we think of the paper’s results, and do we believe TXA should be given to TBI patients? The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and rate us on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A variety of papers, including CRASH-2, suggest that TXA can decrease mortality if given early for patients at risk of significant hemorrhage but exclude patients with TBI. CRASH-3 was a large, multi-national, placebo-controlled randomized trial comparing TXA, 1 gm over 10 minutes, followed by a subsequent 1 gm infusion over the next 8 hours. So… what do we think of the paper’s results, and do we believe TXA should be given to TBI patients? The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and rate us on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/96c015d9/8a022a04.mp3" length="18135586" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Jni61wj8QhsXVoOH8NeCwmXOAbkpUoEehnvBLPQ-RFY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDgv/MTY5MDEyNjA3Ny1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1129</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 13</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 13</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 12: Dual Sequential Defib: Is it better?</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 12: Dual Sequential Defib: Is it better?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f85508c-290f-4f29-9d20-53fd78ec2791</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e4b853eb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>DSD is the current bright and skinny object. Many agencies (including mine) adopted it based on a few case series. Dr. Jarvis discusses a new paper on Houston Fire/EMS’ experience with DSD. Should we change our practice? Listen and find out. Thank you for the comments, reviews, and emails! If you haven’t, please go to your favorite podcast app and leave a rating and review! We appreciate it!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>DSD is the current bright and skinny object. Many agencies (including mine) adopted it based on a few case series. Dr. Jarvis discusses a new paper on Houston Fire/EMS’ experience with DSD. Should we change our practice? Listen and find out. Thank you for the comments, reviews, and emails! If you haven’t, please go to your favorite podcast app and leave a rating and review! We appreciate it!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/e4b853eb/8b25dc41.mp3" length="16183331" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/kmnnecM-zpw0F_vQGrHnblLkTXiINBCSPtRNnXRayQ0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDcv/MTY5MDEyNjA3Mi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1007</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 12</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 12</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 11: Droperidol Review - Research Update</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 11: Droperidol Review - Research Update</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7932fde2-ddd2-4731-aa35-e5cc6a8f27c7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/346f7249</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mike and Ritu bring Dr. Jarvis in the mix for the "cross-over episode of the century"…um, described by Mike as a ménage a trois…it's not like that…he just meant it’s a 3 for one…even that doesn't sound right. He is simply saying, how often do you get 2 AMAZING EMS Physicians on the same pod simultaneously!? We tackle DROPERIDOL!! Remember that medication? It was an amazing drug that lost its way. We talk about why and how it's making a comeback. Still considered one of the top 10 in the industry, we couldn’t do it without your support! Thank you for the comments, reviews, and emails! If you haven’t, please go to your favorite podcast app and leave a rating and review! We appreciate it!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mike and Ritu bring Dr. Jarvis in the mix for the "cross-over episode of the century"…um, described by Mike as a ménage a trois…it's not like that…he just meant it’s a 3 for one…even that doesn't sound right. He is simply saying, how often do you get 2 AMAZING EMS Physicians on the same pod simultaneously!? We tackle DROPERIDOL!! Remember that medication? It was an amazing drug that lost its way. We talk about why and how it's making a comeback. Still considered one of the top 10 in the industry, we couldn’t do it without your support! Thank you for the comments, reviews, and emails! If you haven’t, please go to your favorite podcast app and leave a rating and review! We appreciate it!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/346f7249/41e338d1.mp3" length="100190617" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/qT7hNK252kgpsSisWe2DY3E0BT9Y6QKKbQXKabCjH08/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDYv/MTY5MDEyNjA2Ni1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>6257</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 11</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 11</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 10: A closer look at RSI in Stroke</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 10: A closer look at RSI in Stroke</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7650478-d114-4acf-8e8d-f4b5b739d0c8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f5f773ae</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode was recorded LIVE on Facebook with a ton of fun interactions. Dr. Jeff Jarvis and Mike Verkest look at a recent paper that described stroke patients who underwent RSI had worse outcomes than their non-RSI counterparts! …do the benefits outweigh the risks? Tune in to find out! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and rate us on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode was recorded LIVE on Facebook with a ton of fun interactions. Dr. Jeff Jarvis and Mike Verkest look at a recent paper that described stroke patients who underwent RSI had worse outcomes than their non-RSI counterparts! …do the benefits outweigh the risks? Tune in to find out! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and rate us on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/f5f773ae/6df67c71.mp3" length="69275002" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/sCH5yiVJNRSxEpU6hoRUUXXwn1kO5S9hn-YrGRWKwP4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDUv/MTY5MDEyNjA2MS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4325</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 10</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 10</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 9: A dangerous Proposition: Use of Red Lights and Sirens</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 9: A dangerous Proposition: Use of Red Lights and Sirens</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ba8ad95-cec0-4d2d-9f4f-54902a936740</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2c945908</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the EMS LHP Podcast, Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest look at the data regarding responding to and from calls with lights and sirens…you may be surprised by the risks we are taking…do the benefits outweigh the risks? Tune in to find out! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and rate us on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the EMS LHP Podcast, Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest look at the data regarding responding to and from calls with lights and sirens…you may be surprised by the risks we are taking…do the benefits outweigh the risks? Tune in to find out! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and rate us on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2c945908/fcb12734.mp3" length="47550362" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/IFPHLbeS-gzi_hRAaIr_t4bfn22EiE4mc-py_aEJWvc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDQv/MTY5MDEyNjA1Ni1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2967</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 9</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 9</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, EPIC, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 8: Lessons learned from the EPIC Study</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 8: Lessons learned from the EPIC Study</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93270552-e6cf-4331-a3ae-d278224fd57f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4781d975</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the EMS LHP Podcast, Dr. Jarvis goes solo and discusses an important paper regarding Airway and TBI. The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study (EPIC) published in May of 2019 in JAMA definitely sheds the bright light of science on current EMS Practice. Take a listen and tell us your thoughts! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and give us a rating on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the EMS LHP Podcast, Dr. Jarvis goes solo and discusses an important paper regarding Airway and TBI. The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study (EPIC) published in May of 2019 in JAMA definitely sheds the bright light of science on current EMS Practice. Take a listen and tell us your thoughts! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and give us a rating on your favorite podcast app!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/4781d975/d0a55243.mp3" length="29374953" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Wb22QKO15C8SDph5h4LjIXqFnWcAQP2j73Xox6mWEbs/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDMv/MTY5MDEyNjA1MS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1831</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 8</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 8</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, EPIC, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP Episode 6 | Subdissociative Ketamine for Pain</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP Episode 6 | Subdissociative Ketamine for Pain</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">878027f5-c997-4923-badf-a9bf36b97c6f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/868d769e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the EMS LHP Podcast, Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest are joined by David Olvera to see what the literature says about ketamine for pain. Is it safer? Does it take care of pain any better? Tune in to find out! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and give is a rating on your favorite podcast app! We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the EMS LHP Podcast, Dr. Jarvis and Mike Verkest are joined by David Olvera to see what the literature says about ketamine for pain. Is it safer? Does it take care of pain any better? Tune in to find out! The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast is the newest FlightBridgeED clinical podcast network show! Your feedback has been fantastic, and we appreciate the support! If you haven’t, please leave feedback and give is a rating on your favorite podcast app! We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/868d769e/25477836.mp3" length="76091093" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/IPrnFBWspVOq-ZVB83kRzGcDqGAEroH_GltaL8ydVSc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDIv/MTY5MDEyNjA0NS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4751</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 6</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 6</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Ketamine, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LHP Episode 5 | Breaking News! Airway Management and Time To Epi in OHCA</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LHP Episode 5 | Breaking News! Airway Management and Time To Epi in OHCA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4876553f-dfdd-49b3-8005-4b241600ae76</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2cc7b235</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr Jarvis looks at the first secondary analysis from the PART trial of advanced airway management in cardiac arrest (King LT vs. ETI). The analysis looks at the impact of airway type and time to first epinephrine, with an expanded look at outcomes as a function of time to epi. We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr Jarvis looks at the first secondary analysis from the PART trial of advanced airway management in cardiac arrest (King LT vs. ETI). The analysis looks at the impact of airway type and time to first epinephrine, with an expanded look at outcomes as a function of time to epi. We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/2cc7b235/84c7d98f.mp3" length="16136984" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/ktw6gNLwLpaU7wVU330S0OWBq1l97OwpQvSxyVTfKJI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDEv/MTY5MDEyNjA0MS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1004</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 5</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 5</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Critical Care, Education, Helicopter EMS, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lighthouse Project - Airway Management in Cardiac Arrest - Part II</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Lighthouse Project - Airway Management in Cardiac Arrest - Part II</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e490abbc-3939-4568-b8c2-42fe2c347072</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/223897d8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we continue from part 1 and look at 3 papers that try to answer the question about airway in adult cardiac arrest. Thank you for supporting the FlightBridgeED network of podcasts. We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we continue from part 1 and look at 3 papers that try to answer the question about airway in adult cardiac arrest. Thank you for supporting the FlightBridgeED network of podcasts. We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/223897d8/e938bb37.mp3" length="62373297" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/8vPaOrXH3IdsZeWWzOgTTg9ln4NMQLMJxahO7wOBh3w/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzNDAv/MTY5MDEyNjAzNi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3893</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 4</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 4</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Dan Davis, Eric Bauer, Critical Care, Education, Helicopter EMS, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lighthouse Project - Airway Management in Cardiac Arrest - Analyzing The Data!</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Lighthouse Project - Airway Management in Cardiac Arrest - Analyzing The Data!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">28108119-e675-412a-9a13-c1e07ea1074e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/856bb18d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we look at 3 papers that try to answer the question about the airway in adult cardiac arrest. Put your seat belt on, this episode is nearly 2 hours so we broke it into 2 parts! We are joined By Eric Bauer from the FlightBridgeED podcast for a quick case review to start things off. Thank you for supporting the FlightBridgeED network of podcasts. We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we look at 3 papers that try to answer the question about the airway in adult cardiac arrest. Put your seat belt on, this episode is nearly 2 hours so we broke it into 2 parts! We are joined By Eric Bauer from the FlightBridgeED podcast for a quick case review to start things off. Thank you for supporting the FlightBridgeED network of podcasts. We appreciate the subscriptions, comments, and ratings. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/856bb18d/9ff237f4.mp3" length="45563838" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/wzOAcGrUepK7L73mCXnbTyAvMr8DFRAUX9seQv75jnk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzMzkv/MTY5MDEyNjAzMS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2843</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 3</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 3</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Dan Davis, Eric Bauer, Critical Care, Education, Helicopter EMS, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lighthouse Project - Making Sense Of Epi in Cardiac Arrest</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Lighthouse Project - Making Sense Of Epi in Cardiac Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e61372f2-7e68-4cc4-bf90-cbc4fa3e5a7c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1a3b7f07</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street. Join Mike Verkest and Dr. Jeff Jarvis as they shine the bright light of science on EMS practice in an informative and fun way. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street. Join Mike Verkest and Dr. Jeff Jarvis as they shine the bright light of science on EMS practice in an informative and fun way. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/1a3b7f07/c519a2ba.mp3" length="90245725" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/GpzSZG13LQEZPJRzudEaUjgExmii5Cw6gExXWWeCUsI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzMzgv/MTY5MDEyNjAyNi1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>5635</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 2</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 2</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Dan Davis, Eric Bauer, Critical Care, Education, Helicopter EMS, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lighthouse Project - Introduction!</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Lighthouse Project - Introduction!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db54522d-0706-4a11-9034-feb8fbc6d956</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a34ffdb8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street. Join Mike Verkest and Dr. Jeff Jarvis as they shine the bright light of science on EMS practice in an informative and fun way. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The EMS Lighthouse Project Podcast exists to foster knowledge translation from peer-reviewed scientific journals to the street. Join Mike Verkest and Dr. Jeff Jarvis as they shine the bright light of science on EMS practice in an informative and fun way. Remember that reviews are key to helping keep us high on the charts where your friends and family can find us. We couldn’t make this podcast without you. Thanks for listening!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/a34ffdb8/c9f815ad.mp3" length="12198904" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>FlightBridgeED, LLC.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/UgU7mO3G8w2_DWYasWdVaOUy-F6J-3nyxufQmLrBTnU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE0MjkzMzcv/MTY5MDEyNjAyMS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 1</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 1</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>FlightBridgeED, Mike Verkest, Jeff Jarvis, Dan Davis, Eric Bauer, Critical Care, Education, Helicopter EMS, Air Medical, Nurse, Paramedic, FP-C, CFRN</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
