<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast-from-ruane-dui-criminal-defense-attorneys" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The Connecticut Caselaw Podcast™</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast-from-ruane-dui-criminal-defense-attorneys</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>This podcast covers weekly released decisions from the Connecticut Supreme and Appellate courts as well as revisits seminal cases throughout the years. The podcast breaks down the recent decisions to give you an up to the minute understanding of the current state of the law in the areas of Criminal Law, Injury Law and Family Law.

Attorney Jay Ruane, Juris 415988 is responsible for the content of this advertisement.</description>
    <copyright>James Ruane</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>f0346ae4-6b26-5b28-bb81-566ba93de89f</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 22:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 22:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://www.theconnecticutcaselawpodcast.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Careers"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/v74Sb9hc05NeiJPtULIiOD2c1EgTD50z3awC_MLXUPU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yNmJh/ODk5MTlmMWE2MDM5/MTIwNjhmYzUxZDRj/MGNmMS5qcGc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>This podcast covers weekly released decisions from the Connecticut Supreme and Appellate courts as well as revisits seminal cases throughout the years. The podcast breaks down the recent decisions to give you an up to the minute understanding of the current state of the law in the areas of Criminal Law, Injury Law and Family Law.

Attorney Jay Ruane, Juris 415988 is responsible for the content of this advertisement.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>This podcast covers weekly released decisions from the Connecticut Supreme and Appellate courts as well as revisits seminal cases throughout the years.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>James Ruane</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>podcast@ruaneattorneys.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Exciting Update - We are Starting back up in July 2026</title>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>3</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Exciting Update - We are Starting back up in July 2026</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a3ded02-886f-4ec6-85f9-c4508aedd197</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/66f2029f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Big Announcement Today!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Big Announcement Today!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/66f2029f/5ea2299f.mp3" length="392255" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Big Announcement Today!</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of June 4th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of June 4th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">433b8e98-ff75-4d15-858e-32cc5c6ca2ec</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/396b9704</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p>- DeCicco v. Dynata</p>
<p>- State v. Mallozzi</p>
<p>- Smith v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p>- DeCicco v. Dynata</p>
<p>- State v. Mallozzi</p>
<p>- Smith v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/396b9704/b2ea542a.mp3" length="12675790" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>793</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we cover the appellate court cases of:
- DeCicco v. Dynata
- State v. Mallozzi
- Smith v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we cover the appellate court cases of:
- DeCicco v. Dynata
- State v. Mallozzi
- Smith v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 28th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 28th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b3e6cd3-ba1d-4f6b-8b00-880bdc8bb146</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1f2b3b2e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover one appellate court case of: </p>
<p>- State v. Leuders</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover one appellate court case of: </p>
<p>- State v. Leuders</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1f2b3b2e/4117a690.mp3" length="5329164" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>333</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we cover one appellate court case of: 
- State v. Leuders</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we cover one appellate court case of: 
- State v. Leuders</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 21st, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 21st, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79d7de86-8e4b-436c-aa2f-43dc80a56185</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d948d9b2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of </p>
<p>- Holley v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Tran v. Woodworth</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of </p>
<p>- Holley v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Tran v. Woodworth</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d948d9b2/8377fad7.mp3" length="8586320" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>537</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate court cases of 
- Holley v. Commissioner of Correction
- Tran v. Woodworth</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate court cases of 
- Holley v. Commissioner of Correction
- Tran v. Woodworth</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 14th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 14th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17e6e96d-3e4e-472c-ad12-1784abbdb095</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a466f539</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of</p>
<p>-  In re Denzel W.</p>
<p>- Marafi v. El Achchabi</p>
<p>- Coney v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of</p>
<p>-  In re Denzel W.</p>
<p>- Marafi v. El Achchabi</p>
<p>- Coney v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a466f539/b031b9af.mp3" length="11558428" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>723</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate court cases of
-  In re Denzel W.
- Marafi v. El Achchabi
- Coney v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate court cases of
-  In re Denzel W.
- Marafi v. El Achchabi
- Coney v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 7th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 7th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca887ef9-14c3-47b9-989a-d757bc706ed9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/23ac683d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the cases of: </p>
<ul>
 <li>In re Wendy G.-R.</li>
</ul>
 <li> Banks v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Bosque v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Davis v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li>Hilton v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Michael G. v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li>Hodge v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Reed v. Commissioner of Correction</li>

<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the cases of: </p>
<ul>
 <li>In re Wendy G.-R.</li>
</ul>
 <li> Banks v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Bosque v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Davis v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li>Hilton v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Michael G. v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li>Hodge v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li> Reed v. Commissioner of Correction</li>

<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/23ac683d/c4e78629.mp3" length="25397056" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1588</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the cases of: 

 In re Wendy G.-R.

  Banks v. Commissioner of Correction
   Bosque v. Commissioner of Correction
   Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
  Hilton v. Commissioner of Correction
   Michael G. v. Commissioner of Correction
  Hodge v. Commissioner of Correction
   Reed v. Commissioner of Correction
 </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the cases of: 

 In re Wendy G.-R.

  Banks v. Commissioner of Correction
   Bosque v. Commissioner of Correction
   Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
  Hilton v. Commissioner of Correction
   Michael G. v. Commissioner of Correction
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 30th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 30th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf631041-8398-481f-989d-606869c23e53</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e8baa6ed</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of</p>
<p>- Kukucka v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Harvin v. Yale New Haven Health Services Corp.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of</p>
<p>- Kukucka v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Harvin v. Yale New Haven Health Services Corp.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e8baa6ed/a2a4b92b.mp3" length="7807664" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>488</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate court cases of
- Kukucka v. Commissioner of Correction
- Harvin v. Yale New Haven Health Services Corp.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate court cases of
- Kukucka v. Commissioner of Correction
- Harvin v. Yale New Haven Health Services Corp.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 23rd, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 23rd, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">658fc5cc-cc69-426b-803b-6179fab1476d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e83ad9c4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of: </p>
<p>- In re Zayden J.</p>
<p>- State v. Webber</p>
<p>- A.-M. v. M. Z.</p>
<p>- Grant v. Commissioner of Correction &amp; its dissent </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of: </p>
<p>- In re Zayden J.</p>
<p>- State v. Webber</p>
<p>- A.-M. v. M. Z.</p>
<p>- Grant v. Commissioner of Correction &amp; its dissent </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e83ad9c4/069661c9.mp3" length="18359044" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1148</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate court cases of: 
- In re Zayden J.
- State v. Webber
- A.-M. v. M. Z.
- Grant v. Commissioner of Correction &amp;amp; its dissent </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate court cases of: 
- In re Zayden J.
- State v. Webber
- A.-M. v. M. Z.
- Grant v. Commissioner of Correction &amp;amp; its dissent </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 16th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 16th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">549535d4-635d-4e43-af92-85645e3e633d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/353ddd0a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover the supreme court case of: </p>
<p>- Hepburn v. Brill</p>
<p>The appellate court cases of: </p>
<p>- Y. H. v. J. B.</p>
<p>- Cardoza v. Waterbury</p>
<p>- State v. Berrios</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover the supreme court case of: </p>
<p>- Hepburn v. Brill</p>
<p>The appellate court cases of: </p>
<p>- Y. H. v. J. B.</p>
<p>- Cardoza v. Waterbury</p>
<p>- State v. Berrios</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/353ddd0a/0749c680.mp3" length="13437157" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>840</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we cover the supreme court case of: 
- Hepburn v. Brill
The appellate court cases of: 
- Y. H. v. J. B.
- Cardoza v. Waterbury
- State v. Berrios</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we cover the supreme court case of: 
- Hepburn v. Brill
The appellate court cases of: 
- Y. H. v. J. B.
- Cardoza v. Waterbury
- State v. Berrios</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 9th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 9th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f4376582-e52f-4002-8aaf-fbcb4cff370b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/38c03b1e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode we cover the supreme court cases of:</p>
<p>- State v. Diaz</p>
<p>- Marshall v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles</p>
<p>The appellate court cases of: </p>
<p>- James P. v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Vega v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode we cover the supreme court cases of:</p>
<p>- State v. Diaz</p>
<p>- Marshall v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles</p>
<p>The appellate court cases of: </p>
<p>- James P. v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Vega v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/38c03b1e/14776dad.mp3" length="13930922" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>871</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode we cover the supreme court cases of:
- State v. Diaz
- Marshall v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
The appellate court cases of: 
- James P. v. Commissioner of Correction
- Vega v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode we cover the supreme court cases of:
- State v. Diaz
- Marshall v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
The appellate court cases of: 
- James P. v. Commissioner of Correction
- Vega v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 2nd, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 2nd, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee22a16d-5c08-43e2-910b-59175c83c408</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8b398f55</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the Appellate Court case of</p>
<p>- State vs Roberts</p>
<p>There are no Supreme Court cases on this week's episode. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the Appellate Court case of</p>
<p>- State vs Roberts</p>
<p>There are no Supreme Court cases on this week's episode. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8b398f55/606c2d72.mp3" length="3878429" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>243</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the Appellate Court case of
- State vs Roberts
There are no Supreme Court cases on this week's episode. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the Appellate Court case of
- State vs Roberts
There are no Supreme Court cases on this week's episode. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 26th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 26th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25cea545-524f-4aaa-81ed-bef09f419b6c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/67b6cfab</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of </p>
<p>- In re Josyah L.-T.</p>
<p>- Rios v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>The supreme court cases of: </p>
<p>- State v. Sayles</p>
<p>- Following its dissent </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of </p>
<p>- In re Josyah L.-T.</p>
<p>- Rios v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>The supreme court cases of: </p>
<p>- State v. Sayles</p>
<p>- Following its dissent </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:09:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/67b6cfab/6b510984.mp3" length="12391005" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>775</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate court cases of 
- In re Josyah L.-T.
- Rios v. Commissioner of Correction
The supreme court cases of: 
- State v. Sayles
- Following its dissent </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate court cases of 
- In re Josyah L.-T.
- Rios v. Commissioner of Correction
The supreme court cases of: 
- State v. Sayles
- Following its dissent </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 19th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 19th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173261df-5c61-43e0-98a8-5c030bd55577</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0189e8e0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the cases of</p>
<p>- Delgado v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Rodriguez v. Hartford</p>
<p>- Rapp v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- State v. Henderson</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the cases of</p>
<p>- Delgado v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Rodriguez v. Hartford</p>
<p>- Rapp v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- State v. Henderson</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:20:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0189e8e0/aa3c27e8.mp3" length="12913872" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>807</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the cases of
- Delgado v. Commissioner of Correction
- Rodriguez v. Hartford
- Rapp v. Commissioner of Correction
- State v. Henderson</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the cases of
- Delgado v. Commissioner of Correction
- Rodriguez v. Hartford
- Rapp v. Commissioner of Correction
- State v. Henderson</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 5th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 5th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ded764d-75e0-43e7-b7a6-ec7549486e0a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7303d8a5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we go over the appellate court case of </p>
<p>- Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we go over the appellate court case of </p>
<p>- Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 17:14:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7303d8a5/66caef9a.mp3" length="3403209" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>213</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we go over the appellate court case of 
- Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we go over the appellate court case of 
- Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>February 27th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>February 27th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f788b16e-439c-4797-9060-eb55c42f5455</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/09e10e77</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the cases of: </p>
<p>- Greer v. State</p>
<p>- De Almeida-Kennedy v. Kennedy</p>
<p>- Marshall v. Marshall</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the cases of: </p>
<p>- Greer v. State</p>
<p>- De Almeida-Kennedy v. Kennedy</p>
<p>- Marshall v. Marshall</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:13:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/09e10e77/ef7306da.mp3" length="9347421" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>585</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the cases of: 
- Greer v. State
- De Almeida-Kennedy v. Kennedy
- Marshall v. Marshall</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we cover the cases of: 
- Greer v. State
- De Almeida-Kennedy v. Kennedy
- Marshall v. Marshall</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>February 20th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>February 20th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5c093f4a-c194-4b95-aa31-924233587240</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/80bf4bf0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the cases of:</p>
<p>- F. S. v. J. S.</p>
<p>- Cameron v. Santiago</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the cases of:</p>
<p>- F. S. v. J. S.</p>
<p>- Cameron v. Santiago</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:32:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/80bf4bf0/0462c39b.mp3" length="4758229" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>298</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today's episode we go over the cases of:
- F. S. v. J. S.
- Cameron v. Santiago</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today's episode we go over the cases of:
- F. S. v. J. S.
- Cameron v. Santiago</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of February 13th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of February 13th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e574af93-efb9-4b26-9c7d-cc908815d58d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a8393357</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this weeks episode we cover the cases of: </p>
<p>- Silano v. Cooney</p>
<p>- Wethington v. Wethington</p>
<p>- Williams v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this weeks episode we cover the cases of: </p>
<p>- Silano v. Cooney</p>
<p>- Wethington v. Wethington</p>
<p>- Williams v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:35:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a8393357/6d3306a5.mp3" length="10179586" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>637</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this weeks episode we cover the cases of: 
- Silano v. Cooney
- Wethington v. Wethington
- Williams v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this weeks episode we cover the cases of: 
- Silano v. Cooney
- Wethington v. Wethington
- Williams v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of February 6th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of February 6th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2cf818ac-a260-4f77-ac2a-ab73fcaf6536</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3cd8ae45</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Happy February! </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Happy February! </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 22:31:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3cd8ae45/e12f4f55.mp3" length="14791921" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>925</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Happy February! </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Happy February! </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 30th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 30th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3366d189-061e-479d-888e-f875d8f77afe</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e4c21d49</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This weeks episode we go over the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p>- In re Niya B.</p>
<p>- Jacques v. Jacques</p>
<p>- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This weeks episode we go over the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p>- In re Niya B.</p>
<p>- Jacques v. Jacques</p>
<p>- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:58:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e4c21d49/81ade868.mp3" length="8443539" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>528</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This weeks episode we go over the appellate court cases of:
- In re Niya B.
- Jacques v. Jacques
- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This weeks episode we go over the appellate court cases of:
- In re Niya B.
- Jacques v. Jacques
- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 23rd, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 23rd, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b21e174-0c70-44c4-8ebc-7b85e90f50dc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/99ea290d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over the cases:</p>
<p>- Felder v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Jacques v. Jacques</p>
<p>- In re Niya B.</p>
<p>- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over the cases:</p>
<p>- Felder v. Commissioner of Correction</p>
<p>- Jacques v. Jacques</p>
<p>- In re Niya B.</p>
<p>- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:08:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/99ea290d/bb538e88.mp3" length="10678785" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>668</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we go over the cases:
- Felder v. Commissioner of Correction
- Jacques v. Jacques
- In re Niya B.
- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we go over the cases:
- Felder v. Commissioner of Correction
- Jacques v. Jacques
- In re Niya B.
- Hankerson v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 16th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 16th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de7c0d76-399e-42d7-9d52-52e8b7fc176a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a657e723</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we go over the appellate case of:</p>
<p>- Anketell v. Kulldorff</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we go over the appellate case of:</p>
<p>- Anketell v. Kulldorff</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:15:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a657e723/03b40638.mp3" length="3409639" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>213</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we go over the appellate case of:
- Anketell v. Kulldorff</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we go over the appellate case of:
- Anketell v. Kulldorff</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 9th, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 9th, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0ee974e3-5580-4465-9f38-a087f3d2c7bf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f506378f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over the cases of:</p>
<p>- In re Olivia W.</p>
<p>- Zakko v. Kasir</p>
<p>- Gardner v. Dept. of Mental Health &amp; Addiction Services</p>
<p>- State v. Kenneth B.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over the cases of:</p>
<p>- In re Olivia W.</p>
<p>- Zakko v. Kasir</p>
<p>- Gardner v. Dept. of Mental Health &amp; Addiction Services</p>
<p>- State v. Kenneth B.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 21:33:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f506378f/c0ee11f9.mp3" length="12552913" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>785</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we go over the cases of:
- In re Olivia W.
- Zakko v. Kasir
- Gardner v. Dept. of Mental Health &amp;amp; Addiction Services
- State v. Kenneth B.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we go over the cases of:
- In re Olivia W.
- Zakko v. Kasir
- Gardner v. Dept. of Mental Health &amp;amp; Addiction Services
- State v. Kenneth B.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 2nd, 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 2nd, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f023bf43-9c60-4ab2-a7ed-045734b968c8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/09276b38</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!! </p>
<p>In today's episode we go over one appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP66.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Glen S. vs. Commissioner of Correction</a>. Ringing in the good vibes for 2024!!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!! </p>
<p>In today's episode we go over one appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP66.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Glen S. vs. Commissioner of Correction</a>. Ringing in the good vibes for 2024!!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 22:22:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/09276b38/b7fdafa5.mp3" length="2814882" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>176</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Happy New Year!! 
In today's episode we go over one appellate court case of Glen S. vs. Commissioner of Correction. Ringing in the good vibes for 2024!!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Happy New Year!! 
In today's episode we go over one appellate court case of Glen S. vs. Commissioner of Correction. Ringing in the good vibes for 2024!!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 26th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 26th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be9983b8-46dc-440c-b545-a80ff1eba083</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/793cb903</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of </p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Roman v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p>-<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP271.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Marcus v. Cassara</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence </a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/cases/AROap/AP223/223AP64.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- In re Angelina S.</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of </p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Roman v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p>-<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP271.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Marcus v. Cassara</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence </a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/cases/AROap/AP223/223AP64.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- In re Angelina S.</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 21:58:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/793cb903/1d3ad9a5.mp3" length="9839524" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>615</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of 
- Roman v. Commissioner of Correction
-Marcus v. Cassara following its concurrence 
- In re Angelina S.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of 
- Roman v. Commissioner of Correction
-Marcus v. Cassara following its concurrence 
- In re Angelina S.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 19th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 19th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b456b500-b2ab-45fb-bed0-40abd62f3fa6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/714647ed</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we review the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP59.pdf">⁠Ostapowicz v. Wisniewski⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP62.pdf">⁠State v. Torell⁠</a></p>
<p>There are no supreme court cases this week, happy holidays!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we review the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP59.pdf">⁠Ostapowicz v. Wisniewski⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP223/223AP62.pdf">⁠State v. Torell⁠</a></p>
<p>There are no supreme court cases this week, happy holidays!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:36:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/714647ed/f5709e9a.mp3" length="5015857" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>314</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today's episode we review the appellate court cases of:
⁠Ostapowicz v. Wisniewski⁠
⁠State v. Torell⁠
There are no supreme court cases this week, happy holidays!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today's episode we review the appellate court cases of:
⁠Ostapowicz v. Wisniewski⁠
⁠State v. Torell⁠
There are no supreme court cases this week, happy holidays!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 12th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 12th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d181b9c1-b939-411a-b86f-7c785ac12a74</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/37278abf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the Appellate Court cases of:</p>
<p>-<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP56.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> In re Blake P.</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP52.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP53.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- State v. Christopher R.</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP55.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Gainty v. Infantino</a></p>
<p>Supreme Court case of: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR3.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Rose v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the Appellate Court cases of:</p>
<p>-<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP56.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> In re Blake P.</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP52.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP53.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- State v. Christopher R.</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP55.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Gainty v. Infantino</a></p>
<p>Supreme Court case of: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR3.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Rose v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:14:03 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/37278abf/61a3672b.mp3" length="15298907" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>957</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we go over the Appellate Court cases of:
- In re Blake P.
- Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction
- State v. Christopher R.
- Gainty v. Infantino
Supreme Court case of: 
- Rose v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we go over the Appellate Court cases of:
- In re Blake P.
- Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction
- State v. Christopher R.
- Gainty v. Infantino
Supreme Court case of: 
- Rose v. Commissioner of Correction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 5th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 5th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23d04109-7ff6-4330-a941-cd4f81386d0e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0d0f2162</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP41.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Raynor v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP54.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Bennett v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p>The supreme court case of:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR2.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- State v. Gamer</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP41.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Raynor v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP54.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- Bennett v. Commissioner of Correction</a></p>
<p>The supreme court case of:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR2.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">- State v. Gamer</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 02:26:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0d0f2162/31d31abe.mp3" length="6045289" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>378</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of:
- Raynor v. Commissioner of Correction
- Bennett v. Commissioner of Correction
The supreme court case of:
- State v. Gamer</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today's episode we go over the appellate court cases of:
- Raynor v. Commissioner of Correction
- Bennett v. Commissioner of Correction
The supreme court case of:
- State v. Gamer</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 27th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 27th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">030a9fd5-6610-43d4-8f23-6f396ef130d8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9fc030b6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we cover-</p>
<p>Appellate Court Cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li> <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP269.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Simpson v. Simpson,</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP269A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP39.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Reyes v. State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP44.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Graham v. Graham</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Supreme Court Cases: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR1.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Samuel U</a>, following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR1A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence </a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we cover-</p>
<p>Appellate Court Cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li> <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP269.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Simpson v. Simpson,</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP269A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP39.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Reyes v. State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP44.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Graham v. Graham</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Supreme Court Cases: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR1.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Samuel U</a>, following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR1A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence </a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:07:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9fc030b6/99587d2e.mp3" length="13531775" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>846</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today's episode we cover-
Appellate Court Cases:

  Simpson v. Simpson, following its concurrence 
 Reyes v. State
  Graham v. Graham

Supreme Court Cases: 

  State v. Samuel U, following its concurrence </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today's episode we cover-
Appellate Court Cases:

  Simpson v. Simpson, following its concurrence 
 Reyes v. State
  Graham v. Graham

Supreme Court Cases: 

  State v. Samuel U, following its concurrence </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 21st, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 21st, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9616d6d-0cd9-4c32-8dcd-8c2122976f51</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ee63fb59</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we cover the appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP37.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Soyini vs. Commissioner of Correction. </a>There are no supreme court cases released for this week. Have a happy Thanksgiving and enjoy the time off! </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we cover the appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP37.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Soyini vs. Commissioner of Correction. </a>There are no supreme court cases released for this week. Have a happy Thanksgiving and enjoy the time off! </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:15:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ee63fb59/956c1341.mp3" length="2721261" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>170</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we cover the appellate court case of Soyini vs. Commissioner of Correction. There are no supreme court cases released for this week. Have a happy Thanksgiving and enjoy the time off! </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we cover the appellate court case of Soyini vs. Commissioner of Correction. There are no supreme court cases released for this week. Have a happy Thanksgiving and enjoy the time off! </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 14th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 14th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">547b470c-c3b8-44ba-851b-ef4e70fa24e7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/49c95ada</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP31.pdf">⁠ In re Aurora H⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP36.pdf">⁠State v. Martin G,⁠</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP36.pdf">⁠State v. Jeffrey G.⁠</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP31.pdf">⁠ In re Aurora H⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP36.pdf">⁠State v. Martin G,⁠</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP36.pdf">⁠State v. Jeffrey G.⁠</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 19:23:01 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/49c95ada/5e7356bc.mp3" length="7667808" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>480</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the cases of ⁠ In re Aurora H⁠, ⁠State v. Martin G,⁠ and ⁠State v. Jeffrey G.⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we cover the cases of ⁠ In re Aurora H⁠, ⁠State v. Martin G,⁠ and ⁠State v. Jeffrey G.⁠</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 7th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 7th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da36fcd3-ea94-42e0-9cfb-075a0e97c1d2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a229bc1a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we cover the Appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP30.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Brown vs. Commissioner of Correction</a>. No Supreme court cases this week! </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we cover the Appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP30.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Brown vs. Commissioner of Correction</a>. No Supreme court cases this week! </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 02:35:13 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a229bc1a/e91a9ae4.mp3" length="3904502" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>244</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we cover the Appellate court case of Brown vs. Commissioner of Correction. No Supreme court cases this week! </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we cover the Appellate court case of Brown vs. Commissioner of Correction. No Supreme court cases this week! </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 31st, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 31st, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cca3b3ff-42d7-42e4-a870-a0ff6c699d33</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3f8b529c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP16.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Walker vs. Walker </a>and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP18.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Thomas S.</a> There are no supreme court decisions on today's episode!</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Order my book! <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CLKGNGQN?ref_=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_SPXRP2EFC16CGD1MGD6D&amp;language=en_US" rel="noopener noreferer">Tiger Tactics CEO edition.</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP16.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Walker vs. Walker </a>and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP18.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Thomas S.</a> There are no supreme court decisions on today's episode!</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Order my book! <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CLKGNGQN?ref_=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_SPXRP2EFC16CGD1MGD6D&amp;language=en_US" rel="noopener noreferer">Tiger Tactics CEO edition.</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 19:50:24 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3f8b529c/22b5e384.mp3" length="5669962" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>355</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate court cases of Walker vs. Walker and State vs. Thomas S. There are no supreme court decisions on today's episode!

Order my book! Tiger Tactics CEO edition.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate court cases of Walker vs. Walker and State vs. Thomas S. There are no supreme court decisions on today's episode!

Order my book! Tiger Tactics CEO edition.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 24th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 24th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62aec3f9-f0ed-4e85-a394-0e3d8da47d01</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/eba19ada</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP19.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Na-Ki- J,</a> <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP263.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Dusto v. Rogers Corp</a>, following its<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP263A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> dissent and concurrence</a> and ending with the case of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP264.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> Rek v. Pettit.</a>





</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP19.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Na-Ki- J,</a> <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP263.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Dusto v. Rogers Corp</a>, following its<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP263A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> dissent and concurrence</a> and ending with the case of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP222/222AP264.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> Rek v. Pettit.</a>





</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/eba19ada/a4be3924.mp3" length="11437799" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>715</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we go over the cases of In re Na-Ki- J, Dusto v. Rogers Corp, following its dissent and concurrence and ending with the case of Rek v. Pettit.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we go over the cases of In re Na-Ki- J, Dusto v. Rogers Corp, following its dissent and concurrence and ending with the case of Rek v. Pettit.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 17th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 17th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2775cadd-e87c-4d25-83bc-043e341bc34c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5e0746ad</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP13.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Gabriella M</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP9.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Martinez v. Commissioner of Correction. </a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP13.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Gabriella M</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP9.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Martinez v. Commissioner of Correction. </a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 02:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5e0746ad/65cde21b.mp3" length="5924081" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>371</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of In re Gabriella M, and Martinez v. Commissioner of Correction. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of In re Gabriella M, and Martinez v. Commissioner of Correction. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 10th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 10th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53e567df-6163-4496-b6cb-4cfea5dd7714</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6079d7b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP260.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> in re Tarik</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP8.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">in re Phoenix</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP261.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State of CT</a> vs James following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP261A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence</a>. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP260.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> in re Tarik</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP8.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">in re Phoenix</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP261.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State of CT</a> vs James following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP261A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence</a>. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 01:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c6079d7b/bd382690.mp3" length="10438040" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>653</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of in re Tarik, in re Phoenix, State of CT vs James following its concurrence. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of in re Tarik, in re Phoenix, State of CT vs James following its concurrence. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 5th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 5th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a4c1aa0-69df-4d53-b611-1e2d9bb8fe27</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ac0eac85</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP256.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> State vs. Wade</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP259.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Russo.</a> The supreme court cases have not been released yet. Enjoy!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP256.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> State vs. Wade</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP259.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Russo.</a> The supreme court cases have not been released yet. Enjoy!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 19:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ac0eac85/02f509ce.mp3" length="5901510" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>369</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of State vs. Wade and State vs. Russo. The supreme court cases have not been released yet. Enjoy!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we go over the appellate court cases of State vs. Wade and State vs. Russo. The supreme court cases have not been released yet. Enjoy!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of September 26th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of September 26th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d8f2af3d-5e8c-401a-b2ba-2f3f274145fd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3d63102d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have a great week! </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Have a great week! </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3d63102d/2966bb4b.mp3" length="224792" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Have a great week! </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Have a great week! </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of September 19th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of September 19th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">476d48e1-d12b-4b4e-83b8-1c016cfb79f5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/12875c91</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR46.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Robles</a> along with the <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR46A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">dissent</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR46B.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence.</a> Enjoy!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode we go over the case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR46.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Robles</a> along with the <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR46A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">dissent</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR348/348CR46B.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence.</a> Enjoy!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/12875c91/8388275b.mp3" length="7545347" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>472</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today's episode we go over the case of State v. Robles along with the dissent and concurrence. Enjoy!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today's episode we go over the case of State v. Robles along with the dissent and concurrence. Enjoy!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of September 12th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of September 12th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc3cae13-28fb-4295-b295-ce79e55a0f6d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0f328747</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the supreme court case of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR53.pdf"> ⁠State v. Velasquez-Mattos⁠</a>, and the appellate court cases of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP251.pdf"> ⁠Godfrey-Hill v. Commissioner of Correction⁠</a>,<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP252.pdf"> ⁠Madera v. Commissioner of Correction⁠</a>,<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP253.pdf"> ⁠Cooling v. Torrington⁠</a>. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the supreme court case of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR53.pdf"> ⁠State v. Velasquez-Mattos⁠</a>, and the appellate court cases of<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP251.pdf"> ⁠Godfrey-Hill v. Commissioner of Correction⁠</a>,<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP252.pdf"> ⁠Madera v. Commissioner of Correction⁠</a>,<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP253.pdf"> ⁠Cooling v. Torrington⁠</a>. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0f328747/b6e0a224.mp3" length="12320113" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>770</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the supreme court case of ⁠State v. Velasquez-Mattos⁠, and the appellate court cases of ⁠Godfrey-Hill v. Commissioner of Correction⁠, ⁠Madera v. Commissioner of Correction⁠, ⁠Cooling v. Torrington⁠. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we cover the supreme court case of ⁠State v. Velasquez-Mattos⁠, and the appellate court cases of ⁠Godfrey-Hill v. Commissioner of Correction⁠, ⁠Madera v. Commissioner of Correction⁠, ⁠Cooling v. Torrington⁠. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of September 5th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of September 5th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a242454-8481-45b3-a216-5bd298bc9a77</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/98b0f41c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the supreme court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR50.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Tilsen v. Benson</a>.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the supreme court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR50.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Tilsen v. Benson</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/98b0f41c/0d2e5a02.mp3" length="3218632" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>202</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the supreme court case of Tilsen v. Benson.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the supreme court case of Tilsen v. Benson.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of August 29th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of August 29th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5468896-f3aa-4447-928a-b8516c2bf73b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/eadab43b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP246.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Judah</a> and the supreme court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR65.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. James K.</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR48.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Commissioner of Mental Health &amp; Addiction Services v. Freedom of Information Commission</a> following both its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR48A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR48E.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">dissent</a>. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the appellate case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP246.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Judah</a> and the supreme court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR65.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. James K.</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR48.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Commissioner of Mental Health &amp; Addiction Services v. Freedom of Information Commission</a> following both its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR48A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR48E.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">dissent</a>. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/eadab43b/63055696.mp3" length="15106226" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>945</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the appellate case of In re Judah and the supreme court cases of State v. James K., Commissioner of Mental Health &amp;amp; Addiction Services v. Freedom of Information Commission following both its concurrence and dissent. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the appellate case of In re Judah and the supreme court cases of State v. James K., Commissioner of Mental Health &amp;amp; Addiction Services v. Freedom of Information Commission following both its concurrence and dissent. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of August 22nd, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of August 22nd, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1d8a1d38-356e-4ca4-83e0-4734dc5ed8d4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3ed0f6cb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today we go over the appellate cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP243.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Christina C</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP237.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Anderson-Harris v. Harris</a>,<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP242.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> Williams v. Commissioner of Correction</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP244.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Hughes v. Board of Education. </a></p>
<p>The supreme court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR60.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Escobar-Santana v. State</a> as well as its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR60A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence. </a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today we go over the appellate cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP243.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Christina C</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP237.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Anderson-Harris v. Harris</a>,<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP242.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> Williams v. Commissioner of Correction</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP244.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Hughes v. Board of Education. </a></p>
<p>The supreme court cases of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR60.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Escobar-Santana v. State</a> as well as its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR60A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence. </a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3ed0f6cb/895a0a7a.mp3" length="17309288" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1082</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today we go over the appellate cases of In re Christina C, Anderson-Harris v. Harris, Williams v. Commissioner of Correction, Hughes v. Board of Education. 
The supreme court cases of Escobar-Santana v. State as well as its concurrence. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today we go over the appellate cases of In re Christina C, Anderson-Harris v. Harris, Williams v. Commissioner of Correction, Hughes v. Board of Education. 
The supreme court cases of Escobar-Santana v. State as well as its concurrence. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of August 15th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of August 15th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1a21863-10b0-4e8f-b2bd-ceda0ba440d6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/db1e7ad6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we go over the Appellate court cases of I<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP241.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">n re Amani O</a>, <a href="https://wwhttps://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP228.pdfw.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP228.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Pencheva-Hasse v. Hasse</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP236.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Buchenholz v. Buchenholz</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP238.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Gervais v. JACC Healthcare Center of Danielso,</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP239.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Mieles</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP239E.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">dissent</a>. </p>
<p>For the Supreme court cases we cover <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR68.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Mills v. Hartford HealthCare Corp</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR69.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Manginelli v. Regency House of Wallingford, Inc. </a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we go over the Appellate court cases of I<a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP241.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">n re Amani O</a>, <a href="https://wwhttps://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP228.pdfw.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP228.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Pencheva-Hasse v. Hasse</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP236.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Buchenholz v. Buchenholz</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP238.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Gervais v. JACC Healthcare Center of Danielso,</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP239.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Mieles</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP239E.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">dissent</a>. </p>
<p>For the Supreme court cases we cover <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR68.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Mills v. Hartford HealthCare Corp</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR69.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Manginelli v. Regency House of Wallingford, Inc. </a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 19:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/db1e7ad6/881ff131.mp3" length="24081063" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1505</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we go over the Appellate court cases of In re Amani O, Pencheva-Hasse v. Hasse, Buchenholz v. Buchenholz, Gervais v. JACC Healthcare Center of Danielso, and State v. Mieles following its dissent. 
For the Supreme court cases we cover Mills v. Hartford HealthCare Corp, and Manginelli v. Regency House of Wallingford, Inc. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we go over the Appellate court cases of In re Amani O, Pencheva-Hasse v. Hasse, Buchenholz v. Buchenholz, Gervais v. JACC Healthcare Center of Danielso, and State v. Mieles following its dissent. 
For the Supreme court cases we cover Mills v. Ha</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of August 8th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of August 8th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b72dd4ed-8285-492e-9afa-6baeab7f1519</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/988a6b0d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 2 Appellate court cases: <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP232.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Mata v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles,</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP233.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Ochoa v. Behling</a>. For the supreme court cases we go over the case of  <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR64.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Maia v. Commissioner of Correction</a>, as well as <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR55.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Schoenhorn v. Moss</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR55A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence. </a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 2 Appellate court cases: <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP232.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Mata v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles,</a> and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP221/221AP233.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Ochoa v. Behling</a>. For the supreme court cases we go over the case of  <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR64.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Maia v. Commissioner of Correction</a>, as well as <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR55.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Schoenhorn v. Moss</a> following its <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR55A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">concurrence. </a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/988a6b0d/6f9acecf.mp3" length="11936004" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>746</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 2 Appellate court cases: Mata v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, and Ochoa v. Behling. For the supreme court cases we go over the case of  Maia v. Commissioner of Correction, as well as Schoenhorn v. Moss following its concurrence. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 2 Appellate court cases: Mata v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, and Ochoa v. Behling. For the supreme court cases we go over the case of  Maia v. Commissioner of Correction, as well as Schoenhorn v. Moss following its concurrence. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of August 1st, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of August 1st, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">681342c8-8d8b-4fe4-a124-ae9eb360e318</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c7e4ab02</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over 3 Appellate court cases: <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP221.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re L. T</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP224.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Kyreese L Jr</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP226.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Brownstone Exploration &amp; Discovery Park LLC v. Borodkin</a>. We have one supreme court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR47.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Adesokan v. Bloomfield.</a> Enjoy!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over 3 Appellate court cases: <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP221.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re L. T</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP224.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Kyreese L Jr</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP226.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Brownstone Exploration &amp; Discovery Park LLC v. Borodkin</a>. We have one supreme court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR47.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Adesokan v. Bloomfield.</a> Enjoy!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c7e4ab02/b2dde023.mp3" length="12185526" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>762</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we go over 3 Appellate court cases: In re L. T, In re Kyreese L Jr, and Brownstone Exploration &amp;amp; Discovery Park LLC v. Borodkin. We have one supreme court case of Adesokan v. Bloomfield. Enjoy!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we go over 3 Appellate court cases: In re L. T, In re Kyreese L Jr, and Brownstone Exploration &amp;amp; Discovery Park LLC v. Borodkin. We have one supreme court case of Adesokan v. Bloomfield. Enjoy!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of July 25th</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of July 25th</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d44625f-1aad-4e3e-a265-75f79e0a5bdd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e7718ef2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate Court cases:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP213.pdfhttps://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP213.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In Re Ryan</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP205.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">CT vs Robert King</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP211.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">CT vs Mark Despres</a></p>
<p>We have one Supreme Court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR71.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Paulo T</a>. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate Court cases:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP213.pdfhttps://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP213.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In Re Ryan</a>, <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP205.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">CT vs Robert King</a>, and <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP211.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">CT vs Mark Despres</a></p>
<p>We have one Supreme Court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR71.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Paulo T</a>. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e7718ef2/663e66a2.mp3" length="9738786" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>609</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 Appellate Court cases:
In Re Ryan, CT vs Robert King, and CT vs Mark Despres
We have one Supreme Court case of In re Paulo T. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 Appellate Court cases:
In Re Ryan, CT vs Robert King, and CT vs Mark Despres
We have one Supreme Court case of In re Paulo T. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of July 18th</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of July 18th</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9ec1eb3-e655-48f1-9f8e-52f5e3b5757f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/58912ee2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode<a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer"> Rich Rochlin</a> covers the appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP209.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Netter vs. Netter</a> and the supreme court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR49.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Gabriel.</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode<a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer"> Rich Rochlin</a> covers the appellate court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP209.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Netter vs. Netter</a> and the supreme court case of <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR49.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Gabriel.</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/58912ee2/615ac82d.mp3" length="5373202" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>336</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode Rich Rochlin covers the appellate court case of Netter vs. Netter and the supreme court case of In re Gabriel.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode Rich Rochlin covers the appellate court case of Netter vs. Netter and the supreme court case of In re Gabriel.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>July 18, 2023: Special Episode: The United States Supreme Court 2022-23 Criminal Decisions</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>July 18, 2023: Special Episode: The United States Supreme Court 2022-23 Criminal Decisions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbcf32bc-3464-4a3c-a19b-65da31785776</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/58b3f3b0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over the 8 criminal cases decided by the United States Supreme Court in the 2022-23 session.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we go over the 8 criminal cases decided by the United States Supreme Court in the 2022-23 session.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/58b3f3b0/b837d79a.mp3" length="29515433" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1845</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we go over the 8 criminal cases decided by the United States Supreme Court in the 2022-23 session.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we go over the 8 criminal cases decided by the United States Supreme Court in the 2022-23 session.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of July 10, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of July 10, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e77de829-f424-4469-aedc-fd7a245916bf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/47ea4998</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the Supreme court cases of State v. Lanier and State vs. Massaro, and State v. Sullivan from the Appellate court .</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the Supreme court cases of State v. Lanier and State vs. Massaro, and State v. Sullivan from the Appellate court .</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/47ea4998/576d4769.mp3" length="9129405" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>571</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the Supreme court cases of State v. Lanier and State vs. Massaro, and State v. Sullivan from the Appellate court .</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we cover the Supreme court cases of State v. Lanier and State vs. Massaro, and State v. Sullivan from the Appellate court .</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of July 3, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of July 3, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23986c90-045b-427b-8c98-3b265ad2231b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4c1c5465</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover the Appellate court cases of State vs. Griffin, Morales vs. Commissioner, Prioleau vs. Agosto and Haydusky's Appeal from Probate.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover the Appellate court cases of State vs. Griffin, Morales vs. Commissioner, Prioleau vs. Agosto and Haydusky's Appeal from Probate.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4c1c5465/d5b2b1fc.mp3" length="11437793" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>715</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we cover the Appellate court cases of State vs. Griffin, Morales vs. Commissioner, Prioleau vs. Agosto and Haydusky's Appeal from Probate.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover the Appellate court cases of State vs. Griffin, Morales vs. Commissioner, Prioleau vs. Agosto and Haydusky's Appeal from Probate.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of June 27th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of June 27th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b18b81eb-c639-4f28-b991-7e1dbbd03818</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1618902f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the Appellate Court cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP195.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">A.D. vs. L.D. (Family)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP197.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Strauss vs. Strauss (Divorce)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP198.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">R.H. vs M.H (Divorce) </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Supreme Court case </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR30.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Khan vs. Yale University (Criminal)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Law</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the Appellate Court cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP195.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">A.D. vs. L.D. (Family)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP197.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Strauss vs. Strauss (Divorce)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP198.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">R.H. vs M.H (Divorce) </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Supreme Court case </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR347/347CR30.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Khan vs. Yale University (Criminal)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Law</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1618902f/6b8ca640.mp3" length="14400290" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>900</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the Appellate Court cases:

 A.D. vs. L.D. (Family)
 Strauss vs. Strauss (Divorce)
 R.H. vs M.H (Divorce) 

Supreme Court case 

 Khan vs. Yale University (Criminal)

Hosts:
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the Appellate Court cases:

 A.D. vs. L.D. (Family)
 Strauss vs. Strauss (Divorce)
 R.H. vs M.H (Divorce) 

Supreme Court case 

 Khan vs. Yale University (Criminal)

Hosts:
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠
Family Law: Rich</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of June 20th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of June 20th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6600ea7-f5d9-4013-b68e-755b3e8ed631</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ee52e700</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>On this week's episode we go over 3 Appellate Court decisions </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP189.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In Deboras S. (Family Law)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP187.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Ammar I. v. Dept. of Children &amp; Families (Family Law)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP193.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> Cornelius v. Markle Investigators, Inc. (Criminal Law) </a></li>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP193A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of Cornelius vs Markle Investigators </a></p>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Firm</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On this week's episode we go over 3 Appellate Court decisions </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP189.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In Deboras S. (Family Law)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP187.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Ammar I. v. Dept. of Children &amp; Families (Family Law)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP193.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer"> Cornelius v. Markle Investigators, Inc. (Criminal Law) </a></li>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP220/220AP193A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of Cornelius vs Markle Investigators </a></p>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Firm</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ee52e700/adc44b61.mp3" length="13639187" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>853</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this week's episode we go over 3 Appellate Court decisions 

 In Deboras S. (Family Law)
 Ammar I. v. Dept. of Children &amp;amp; Families (Family Law)
  Cornelius v. Markle Investigators, Inc. (Criminal Law) 
Concurrence of Cornelius vs Markle Investigators 

Hosts: 
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Firm</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this week's episode we go over 3 Appellate Court decisions 

 In Deboras S. (Family Law)
 Ammar I. v. Dept. of Children &amp;amp; Families (Family Law)
  Cornelius v. Markle Investigators, Inc. (Criminal Law) 
Concurrence of Cornelius vs Markle Investigato</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of June 13th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of June 13th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc1a1d7e-e1de-44a2-a91e-28796f9a371a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f3d01133</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 4 Appellate court decisions: </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP188.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Marie (Family Law)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP190.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Timothy B. (Family Law)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP179.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Jakobowski v. State (Personal Injury)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP180.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Bassett v. East Haven (Personal Injury)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Law</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 4 Appellate court decisions: </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP188.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Marie (Family Law)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP190.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re Timothy B. (Family Law)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP179.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Jakobowski v. State (Personal Injury)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP180.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Bassett v. East Haven (Personal Injury)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Law</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f3d01133/80795c5a.mp3" length="15457727" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>966</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 4 Appellate court decisions: 

 In re Marie (Family Law)
 In re Timothy B. (Family Law)
  Jakobowski v. State (Personal Injury)
  Bassett v. East Haven (Personal Injury)

Hosts:
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠
⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rochlin Family Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 4 Appellate court decisions: 

 In re Marie (Family Law)
 In re Timothy B. (Family Law)
  Jakobowski v. State (Personal Injury)
  Bassett v. East Haven (Personal Injury)

Hosts:
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠
⁠Injury Law:</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of June 6th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of June 6th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bb965bc-9eef-4c13-8643-500bfa917ea5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a67ddc46</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions </strong></p>
<ul>
 <li>In re Prince S. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
 <li>R. H. vs. M.H. and the dissent of R. H. vs. M. H. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>1 Supreme court decision </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>State of Connecticut vs. Richard Langston </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys</li>
  <li>Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm </li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions </strong></p>
<ul>
 <li>In re Prince S. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
 <li>R. H. vs. M.H. and the dissent of R. H. vs. M. H. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>1 Supreme court decision </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>State of Connecticut vs. Richard Langston </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys</li>
  <li>Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm </li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a67ddc46/628e2cf6.mp3" length="16744205" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1047</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions 

 In re Prince S. 


 R. H. vs. M.H. and the dissent of R. H. vs. M. H. 

1 Supreme court decision 

  State of Connecticut vs. Richard Langston 

Hosts:

  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys
  Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions 

 In re Prince S. 


 R. H. vs. M.H. and the dissent of R. H. vs. M. H. 

1 Supreme court decision 

  State of Connecticut vs. Richard Langston 

Hosts:

  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys
  Family </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 30, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 30, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e279404-9f38-4d85-bf4b-d2e29840c593</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b54728e1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the one case decided this week, State v. Olivero</p>
<p>Happy Memorial Day Weekend!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the one case decided this week, State v. Olivero</p>
<p>Happy Memorial Day Weekend!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b54728e1/32eaea59.mp3" length="4813558" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>301</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the one case decided this week, State v. Olivero
Happy Memorial Day Weekend!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we cover the one case decided this week, State v. Olivero
Happy Memorial Day Weekend!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 22, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 22, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a439bcfd-e1ef-4935-a26e-799d6f22aecf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5a159ea9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 4 appellate court decisions</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP162.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Perkidis v. Klarsfield</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP165.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Carter vs. Commissioner</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP170.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Sease vs. Commissioner</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP173.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Reese vs. Commissioner</a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: ⁠<a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/jay-ruane/">⁠<strong>Jay Ruane</strong>⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠⁠<strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong>⁠⁠</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">⁠⁠<strong>Ryan McKeen</strong>⁠⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/">⁠⁠<strong>CT Trial Firm</strong>⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 4 appellate court decisions</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP162.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Perkidis v. Klarsfield</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP165.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Carter vs. Commissioner</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP170.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Sease vs. Commissioner</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP219/219AP173.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Reese vs. Commissioner</a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: ⁠<a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/jay-ruane/">⁠<strong>Jay Ruane</strong>⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠⁠<strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong>⁠⁠</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">⁠⁠<strong>Ryan McKeen</strong>⁠⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/">⁠⁠<strong>CT Trial Firm</strong>⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5a159ea9/9d847d76.mp3" length="19249032" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1203</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 4 appellate court decisions
Perkidis v. Klarsfield
Carter vs. Commissioner
Sease vs. Commissioner
Reese vs. Commissioner

Hosts:
Criminal Law: ⁠⁠Jay Ruane⁠, ⁠⁠Ruane Attorneys⁠⁠
Injury Law: ⁠⁠Ryan McKeen⁠⁠, ⁠⁠CT Trial Firm⁠⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 4 appellate court decisions
Perkidis v. Klarsfield
Carter vs. Commissioner
Sease vs. Commissioner
Reese vs. Commissioner

Hosts:
Criminal Law: ⁠⁠Jay Ruane⁠, ⁠⁠Ruane Attorneys⁠⁠
Injury Law: ⁠⁠Ryan McKeen⁠⁠, ⁠⁠CT Trial Firm⁠⁠</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 15 2023</title>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>3</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 15 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">595ae805-ec51-4e8a-9a30-59a05ef64049</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b34987f8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the only case released by our Supreme court this week - State v Malone and 3 appellate court decisions, State v. Taveras, State v. Ebron and State v. Valentine.</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: ⁠<a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/jay-ruane/"><strong>Jay Ruane</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠<strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong>⁠</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">⁠<strong>Ryan McKeen</strong>⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/">⁠<strong>CT Trial Firm</strong>⁠</a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/">⁠<strong>Rich Rochlin</strong>⁠</a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠<strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover the only case released by our Supreme court this week - State v Malone and 3 appellate court decisions, State v. Taveras, State v. Ebron and State v. Valentine.</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: ⁠<a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/jay-ruane/"><strong>Jay Ruane</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠<strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong>⁠</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">⁠<strong>Ryan McKeen</strong>⁠</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/">⁠<strong>CT Trial Firm</strong>⁠</a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/">⁠<strong>Rich Rochlin</strong>⁠</a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠<strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b34987f8/e493921b.mp3" length="26996740" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1688</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover the only case released by our Supreme court this week - State v Malone and 3 appellate court decisions, State v. Taveras, State v. Ebron and State v. Valentine.
Hosts:
Criminal Law: ⁠Jay Ruane, ⁠Ruane Attorneys⁠
Injury Law: ⁠Ryan McKeen⁠, ⁠CT Trial Firm⁠
Family Law: ⁠Rich Rochlin⁠, ⁠Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover the only case released by our Supreme court this week - State v Malone and 3 appellate court decisions, State v. Taveras, State v. Ebron and State v. Valentine.
Hosts:
Criminal Law: ⁠Jay Ruane, ⁠Ruane Attorneys⁠
Injury Law: ⁠Ryan McKeen</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 9th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 9th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1899408-ee42-4849-ad62-2371f0ebb43d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4a4b8a2b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode covers two cases: Young v. Commissioner of Correction, Pryor v. Brignole and the Dissent of Pryor v. Brignole. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode covers two cases: Young v. Commissioner of Correction, Pryor v. Brignole and the Dissent of Pryor v. Brignole. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4a4b8a2b/ff1d5f3d.mp3" length="11353367" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>710</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode covers two cases: Young v. Commissioner of Correction, Pryor v. Brignole and the Dissent of Pryor v. Brignole. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode covers two cases: Young v. Commissioner of Correction, Pryor v. Brignole and the Dissent of Pryor v. Brignole. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of May 2nd, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of May 2nd, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f089dee3-44be-4e85-9341-4938dc82c716</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b7d06852</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode covers 5 cases: State vs. Alvarez, Stanziale vs. Hunt, Napolitano vs. Ace American Insurance Company, State vs. DeCosta, and lastly Francis vs. CIT Bank. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode covers 5 cases: State vs. Alvarez, Stanziale vs. Hunt, Napolitano vs. Ace American Insurance Company, State vs. DeCosta, and lastly Francis vs. CIT Bank. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 16:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b7d06852/b884cd1a.mp3" length="15886970" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>993</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode covers 5 cases: State vs. Alvarez, Stanziale vs. Hunt, Napolitano vs. Ace American Insurance Company, State vs. DeCosta, and lastly Francis vs. CIT Bank. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode covers 5 cases: State vs. Alvarez, Stanziale vs. Hunt, Napolitano vs. Ace American Insurance Company, State vs. DeCosta, and lastly Francis vs. CIT Bank. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 25th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 25th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15aa4688-8e22-48c9-b6fe-d5e845723636</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d09423c9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode covers 5 cases: Menard vs. State, O'Reggio vs. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, ARVYS Protein, Inc. vs. A/F Protein, Inc, State vs. Santiago, and lastly C. M vs. R. M. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode covers 5 cases: Menard vs. State, O'Reggio vs. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, ARVYS Protein, Inc. vs. A/F Protein, Inc, State vs. Santiago, and lastly C. M vs. R. M. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d09423c9/9da17c52.mp3" length="15529618" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>971</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode covers 5 cases: Menard vs. State, O'Reggio vs. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, ARVYS Protein, Inc. vs. A/F Protein, Inc, State vs. Santiago, and lastly C. M vs. R. M. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode covers 5 cases: Menard vs. State, O'Reggio vs. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, ARVYS Protein, Inc. vs. A/F Protein, Inc, State vs. Santiago, and lastly C. M vs. R. M. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 18th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 18th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e674d84-d5e0-4e22-a3e3-3b47a8c0639a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/774c8053</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 3 appellate court decisions </strong></p>
<p>- Trejo vs. Yale new Haven Hospital</p>
<p>- C. D vs C. D</p>
<p>- Torres vs. State </p>
<p><strong>And 1 supreme court decision</strong></p>
<p>- Dobie vs. New Haven</p>
<p><strong>Hosts:</strong></p>
<p>Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </p>
<p>Injury Law: Ryan Mckeen, Ct Trial Firm</p>
<p>Family Law:  Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Famliy Firm </p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 3 appellate court decisions </strong></p>
<p>- Trejo vs. Yale new Haven Hospital</p>
<p>- C. D vs C. D</p>
<p>- Torres vs. State </p>
<p><strong>And 1 supreme court decision</strong></p>
<p>- Dobie vs. New Haven</p>
<p><strong>Hosts:</strong></p>
<p>Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </p>
<p>Injury Law: Ryan Mckeen, Ct Trial Firm</p>
<p>Family Law:  Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Famliy Firm </p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 19:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/774c8053/7f47a07b.mp3" length="12885608" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>806</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 appellate court decisions 
- Trejo vs. Yale new Haven Hospital
- C. D vs C. D
- Torres vs. State 
And 1 supreme court decision
- Dobie vs. New Haven
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys 
Injury Law: Ryan Mckeen, Ct Trial Firm
Family Law:  Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Famliy Firm </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 appellate court decisions 
- Trejo vs. Yale new Haven Hospital
- C. D vs C. D
- Torres vs. State 
And 1 supreme court decision
- Dobie vs. New Haven
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys 
Injury Law: Ryan Mckeen, Ct Trial Fi</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 11th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 11th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a0701fc-0aaa-4914-960f-238e12fb98f4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/310c0f5b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 2 supreme court decisions </strong></p>
<p>- Cerame vs. Lamont </p>
<p>- State vs. Michael R.</p>
<p><strong>And 3 Appellate decisions</strong></p>
<p>- State vs. Perez-Lopez </p>
<p>- Gregory vs. Commissioner of Correction </p>
<p>- State vs. Orane C. </p>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<p>Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </p>
<p>Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm </p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 2 supreme court decisions </strong></p>
<p>- Cerame vs. Lamont </p>
<p>- State vs. Michael R.</p>
<p><strong>And 3 Appellate decisions</strong></p>
<p>- State vs. Perez-Lopez </p>
<p>- Gregory vs. Commissioner of Correction </p>
<p>- State vs. Orane C. </p>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<p>Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </p>
<p>Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm </p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/310c0f5b/0a03855c.mp3" length="19707956" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1232</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 2 supreme court decisions 
- Cerame vs. Lamont 
- State vs. Michael R.
And 3 Appellate decisions
- State vs. Perez-Lopez 
- Gregory vs. Commissioner of Correction 
- State vs. Orane C. 
Hosts: 
Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys 
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 2 supreme court decisions 
- Cerame vs. Lamont 
- State vs. Michael R.
And 3 Appellate decisions
- State vs. Perez-Lopez 
- Gregory vs. Commissioner of Correction 
- State vs. Orane C. 
Hosts: 
Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 4th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 4th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b5723d7-0734-4119-82c9-7f84893452c0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c7c735df</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions: </strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP109.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Kelly vs. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP114.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Braasch vs. Freedom of Information Commission</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/" rel="noopener noreferer">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm  </a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </a></li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions: </strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP109.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Kelly vs. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP114.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Braasch vs. Freedom of Information Commission</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/" rel="noopener noreferer">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm  </a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </a></li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c7c735df/8729ccaa.mp3" length="7969989" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>498</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions: 

 Kelly vs. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services 
 Braasch vs. Freedom of Information Commission

Hosts: 

  Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm  


  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions: 

 Kelly vs. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services 
 Braasch vs. Freedom of Information Commission

Hosts: 

  Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm  


  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane At</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 28th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 28th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c72c345-1295-40d8-9ae4-45e4c394e12d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4fb9b5c4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we only cover 2 appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP105.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Eric L</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP106.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Pascarella vs. Silver </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we only cover 2 appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP105.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Eric L</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP106.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Pascarella vs. Silver </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4fb9b5c4/30a273b0.mp3" length="7468857" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>467</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we only cover 2 appellate court decisions:

 State vs. Eric L
 Pascarella vs. Silver 

Hosts:

  ⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  ⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we only cover 2 appellate court decisions:

 State vs. Eric L
 Pascarella vs. Silver 

Hosts:

  ⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  ⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 21st, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 21st, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdc3950e-8fa9-42d2-993f-9ea664017eae</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ca16b1cd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 3 criminal Appellate court decisions: </strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP101.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Leffingwell vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP111.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Delacruz-Gomez</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP113.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Brewer vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 3 criminal Appellate court decisions: </strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP101.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Leffingwell vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP111.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Delacruz-Gomez</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP113.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Brewer vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:11:07 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ca16b1cd/739033c7.mp3" length="9531904" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>596</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 criminal Appellate court decisions: 

 Leffingwell vs. Commissioner of Correction 
 State vs. Delacruz-Gomez
  Brewer vs. Commissioner of Correction 

Hosts: 

  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 criminal Appellate court decisions: 

 Leffingwell vs. Commissioner of Correction 
 State vs. Delacruz-Gomez
  Brewer vs. Commissioner of Correction 

Hosts: 

  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 14th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 14th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0aacd42b-9c71-4437-8c97-a0504fc0be7f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/082e67c6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP91.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">V. V. vs. V. V. </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP96.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Doe vs. Quinnipiac University </a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm </a></li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>
<ul>
<ul>
<br></ul>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP91.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">V. V. vs. V. V. </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP96.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Doe vs. Quinnipiac University </a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm </a></li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>
<ul>
<ul>
<br></ul>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:47:11 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/082e67c6/c0e3fbe0.mp3" length="6095443" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>381</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions:

 V. V. vs. V. V. 
 Doe vs. Quinnipiac University 

Hosts: 

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm


  ⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we only cover 2 Appellate court decisions:

 V. V. vs. V. V. 
 Doe vs. Quinnipiac University 

Hosts: 

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm


  ⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 7th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 7th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f51300bb-6cba-4a2b-b0c6-ebca10d2bfa2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e48b9780</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>In this week's episode we cover 2 Supreme court decisions and 2 Appellate court decisions:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR15.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Calhoun</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR16.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Curet</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP86.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Armstrong </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP88.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Mitchell vs. Bogonos</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm </a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>In this week's episode we cover 2 Supreme court decisions and 2 Appellate court decisions:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR15.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Calhoun</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR16.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Curet</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP86.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Armstrong </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP218/218AP88.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Mitchell vs. Bogonos</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/" rel="noopener noreferer">Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm </a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 20:47:43 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e48b9780/9d67bc2b.mp3" length="12362740" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>773</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week's episode we cover 2 Supreme court decisions and 2 Appellate court decisions:

 State vs. Calhoun
 State vs. Curet
  State vs. Armstrong 
  Mitchell vs. Bogonos

Hosts: 

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠
  Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Firm </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode we cover 2 Supreme court decisions and 2 Appellate court decisions:

 State vs. Calhoun
 State vs. Curet
  State vs. Armstrong 
  Mitchell vs. Bogonos

Hosts: 

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠
  Family Law: Rich Rochli</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of February 28th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of February 28th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e298b3d4-6178-4691-b97b-407b2dc26f41</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fc6461bd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 3 Appellate court cases:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP70.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re K. M.</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP79.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Houghtaling vs. Benevides</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP85.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Stanley vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>1 Supreme Court decision:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR12.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. King</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠</a><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠ </a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>This week we cover 3 Appellate court cases:</strong></p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP70.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re K. M.</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP79.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Houghtaling vs. Benevides</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP85.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Stanley vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>1 Supreme Court decision:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR12.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. King</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hosts: </strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠</a><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠ </a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:19:08 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fc6461bd/f7d6b81f.mp3" length="13090411" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>819</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 Appellate court cases:

 In re K. M.
 Houghtaling vs. Benevides
  Stanley vs. Commissioner of Correction 

1 Supreme Court decision:

  State vs. King

Hosts: 

  ⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠


  Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠


  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠ </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 Appellate court cases:

 In re K. M.
 Houghtaling vs. Benevides
  Stanley vs. Commissioner of Correction 

1 Supreme Court decision:

  State vs. King

Hosts: 

  ⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠


  Injury Law: Rya</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of February 21st, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of February 21st, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ff879e5-4487-4f94-b835-c7048a2c03ff</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2967516</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP69.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Onyilogwu vs. Onyilogwu </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP74.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Foster vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP75.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Herrera vs. Meadow Hill, Inc. </a></li>
</ul>
<p>2 Supreme court decisions:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR11.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Gershon vs. Back</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR14.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. vs. Pasiak</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠ </a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP69.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Onyilogwu vs. Onyilogwu </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP74.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Foster vs. Commissioner of Correction </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP75.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Herrera vs. Meadow Hill, Inc. </a></li>
</ul>
<p>2 Supreme court decisions:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR11.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Gershon vs. Back</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR14.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. vs. Pasiak</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠ </a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:27:15 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a2967516/636b4032.mp3" length="15782904" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>987</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 Onyilogwu vs. Onyilogwu 
 Foster vs. Commissioner of Correction 
  Herrera vs. Meadow Hill, Inc. 

2 Supreme court decisions:

  Gershon vs. Back
  Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. vs. Pasiak

Hosts: 

  Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠ 


  Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠


  ⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 Onyilogwu vs. Onyilogwu 
 Foster vs. Commissioner of Correction 
  Herrera vs. Meadow Hill, Inc. 

2 Supreme court decisions:

  Gershon vs. Back
  Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. vs. Pasiak

Hosts: 

  Crimina</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of February 14th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of February 14th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56b1b349-01f2-4280-ae31-1f7098a4cbca</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ff5e2f34</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover 2 Appellate Court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP67.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Lastrina vs. Bettauer </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP71.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">McGovern vs. McGovern </a></li>
</ul>
<p>3 Supreme Court decisions: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR9.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Connecticut Dermatology Group, PC vs. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR84.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Carpenter vs. Daar</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR10.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Juan A</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover 2 Appellate Court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP67.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Lastrina vs. Bettauer </a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP71.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">McGovern vs. McGovern </a></li>
</ul>
<p>3 Supreme Court decisions: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR9.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Connecticut Dermatology Group, PC vs. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR84.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Carpenter vs. Daar</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR10.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Juan A</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:54:20 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ff5e2f34/4e896ac6.mp3" length="18141448" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1134</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we cover 2 Appellate Court decisions:

 Lastrina vs. Bettauer 
 McGovern vs. McGovern 

3 Supreme Court decisions: 

  Connecticut Dermatology Group, PC vs. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. 
  Carpenter vs. Daar
  State vs. Juan A

Hosts:

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠


  Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠


  ⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we cover 2 Appellate Court decisions:

 Lastrina vs. Bettauer 
 McGovern vs. McGovern 

3 Supreme Court decisions: 

  Connecticut Dermatology Group, PC vs. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. 
  Carpenter vs. Daar
  State vs. Juan A

Hosts:

  ⁠C</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of February 7th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of February 7th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6883ece-8365-4aa1-aee7-639da727bb17</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1037a602</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP62.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Foster</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP62A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of State vs. Foster</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">D. S. vs. D. S</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's episode we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP62.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State v. Foster</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP62A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of State vs. Foster</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">D. S. vs. D. S</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 18:33:45 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1037a602/cef1491c.mp3" length="10950877" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>685</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week's episode we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 State v. Foster



 Concurrence of State vs. Foster



  D. S. vs. D. S

Hosts: 

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  ⁠⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week's episode we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 State v. Foster



 Concurrence of State vs. Foster



  D. S. vs. D. S

Hosts: 

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  ⁠⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠⁠</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 31st, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 31st, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa0c6fe8-5ba7-448d-94f8-54905e68514a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5a6e88c7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP53.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Booth vs Park Terrace II Mutual Housing Ltd. Partnership (Personal Injury)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP57.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Aviles vs. Barnhill (Personal Injury)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP59.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Hurdle (Criminal)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>1 Supreme court decision:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR8.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Devine vs. Fusaro (Personal Injury)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP53.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Booth vs Park Terrace II Mutual Housing Ltd. Partnership (Personal Injury)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP57.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Aviles vs. Barnhill (Personal Injury)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP59.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Hurdle (Criminal)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>1 Supreme court decision:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR346/346CR8.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Devine vs. Fusaro (Personal Injury)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:05:23 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5a6e88c7/2e34c8c3.mp3" length="13889130" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>868</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 Booth vs Park Terrace II Mutual Housing Ltd. Partnership (Personal Injury)
 Aviles vs. Barnhill (Personal Injury)
  State vs. Hurdle (Criminal)

1 Supreme court decision:

  Devine vs. Fusaro (Personal Injury)

Hosts:

  ⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠


  ⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 Booth vs Park Terrace II Mutual Housing Ltd. Partnership (Personal Injury)
 Aviles vs. Barnhill (Personal Injury)
  State vs. Hurdle (Criminal)

1 Supreme court decision:

  Devine vs. Fusaro (Personal Inj</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 24th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 24th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6eb47a62-1887-4b8b-86e0-86db22b607a6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3b809073</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP55.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re A'vion (divorce)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP54.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Griffin (Criminal)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP58.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Charles L. (Criminal) </a></li>
</ul>
<p>3 Supreme court decisions: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR4.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Grant vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Brandon (Criminal)</a></li>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR63A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of State vs. Brandon - Justice D’Auria </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR63E.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Dissent of State vs. Brandon - Justice Ecker</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR5.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Solon vs. Slater (Personal Injury) </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠ </a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP55.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">In re A'vion (divorce)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP54.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Griffin (Criminal)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP58.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Charles L. (Criminal) </a></li>
</ul>
<p>3 Supreme court decisions: </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR4.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Grant vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR63.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. Brandon (Criminal)</a></li>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR63A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of State vs. Brandon - Justice D’Auria </a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR63E.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Dissent of State vs. Brandon - Justice Ecker</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR5.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Solon vs. Slater (Personal Injury) </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠ </a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:38:57 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3b809073/67c75859.mp3" length="27886583" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1743</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 In re A'vion (divorce)
 State vs. Griffin (Criminal)
  State vs. Charles L. (Criminal) 

3 Supreme court decisions: 

  Grant vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)
  State vs. Brandon (Criminal)

  Concurrence of State vs. Brandon - Justice D’Auria 
  Dissent of State vs. Brandon - Justice Ecker



  Solon vs. Slater (Personal Injury) 

Hosts: 
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠
⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠ </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 3 Appellate court decisions:

 In re A'vion (divorce)
 State vs. Griffin (Criminal)
  State vs. Charles L. (Criminal) 

3 Supreme court decisions: 

  Grant vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)
  State vs. Brandon (Criminal)

  Con</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 17th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 17th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf621dfc-fc20-40a4-8282-1218c9a83451</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0f44c796</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP49.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Renstrup vs Renstrup (Divorce)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP52.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Ross vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>1 Supreme court decision </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR75.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. James A. </a></li>
</ul>
<p>	-   <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR75A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of State vs. James A. - Justice Robinson </a></p>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP49.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Renstrup vs Renstrup (Divorce)</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP52.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Ross vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>1 Supreme court decision </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR75.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">State vs. James A. </a></li>
</ul>
<p>	-   <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR75A.pdf" rel="noopener noreferer">Concurrence of State vs. James A. - Justice Robinson </a></p>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/">⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:00:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0f44c796/e66584bf.mp3" length="14825777" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>927</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions 

 Renstrup vs Renstrup (Divorce)
 Ross vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)

1 Supreme court decision 

 State vs. James A. 

	-   Concurrence of State vs. James A. - Justice Robinson 
Hosts: 
Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠
⁠Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Family Law⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 2 Appellate court decisions 

 Renstrup vs Renstrup (Divorce)
 Ross vs. Commissioner of Correction (Criminal)

1 Supreme court decision 

 State vs. James A. 

	-   Concurrence of State vs. James A. - Justice Robinson 
Hosts: 
Criminal </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>January 10th, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>January 10th, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e1b04105-bce6-4df6-a30b-7a06f51f002f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5a45b60d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 2 appellate court decisions </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP393.pdf">⁠King vs. Hubbard (Personal injury)⁠</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP47.pdf">⁠State vs. Henry (Criminal) ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>2 Supreme court decisions </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR55.pdf">⁠State vs. Douglas C (Criminal)⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>       <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR55A.pdf">⁠    - Concurrence of State vs. Douglas C⁠</a></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR54.pdf">⁠State vs. Joseph V (Criminal)⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>         <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR54A.pdf">⁠  - State vs. Joseph V (Criminal) ⁠</a></p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></p>
</li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 2 appellate court decisions </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP393.pdf">⁠King vs. Hubbard (Personal injury)⁠</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP47.pdf">⁠State vs. Henry (Criminal) ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>2 Supreme court decisions </p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR55.pdf">⁠State vs. Douglas C (Criminal)⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>       <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR55A.pdf">⁠    - Concurrence of State vs. Douglas C⁠</a></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR54.pdf">⁠State vs. Joseph V (Criminal)⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>         <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR345/345CR54A.pdf">⁠  - State vs. Joseph V (Criminal) ⁠</a></p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</a></p>
</li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:37:25 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5a45b60d/bbb927f5.mp3" length="24835055" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1553</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 2 appellate court decisions 

 ⁠King vs. Hubbard (Personal injury)⁠
 ⁠State vs. Henry (Criminal) ⁠

2 Supreme court decisions 

  ⁠State vs. Douglas C (Criminal)⁠

       ⁠    - Concurrence of State vs. Douglas C⁠

  ⁠State vs. Joseph V (Criminal)⁠

         ⁠  - State vs. Joseph V (Criminal) ⁠
Hosts:

  ⁠⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠



  ⁠⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 2 appellate court decisions 

 ⁠King vs. Hubbard (Personal injury)⁠
 ⁠State vs. Henry (Criminal) ⁠

2 Supreme court decisions 

  ⁠State vs. Douglas C (Criminal)⁠

       ⁠    - Concurrence of State vs. Douglas C⁠

  ⁠State vs. Joseph V</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>January 3rd, 2023</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>January 3rd, 2023</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2e11214a-47b7-42e8-8c10-741c354138c0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/63f1e96b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 1 Appellate court decision</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP51.pdf">⁠Murphy vs. Clinton ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we cover 1 Appellate court decision</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP217/217AP51.pdf">⁠Murphy vs. Clinton ⁠</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cttrialfirm.com/team/ryan-mckeen/">⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 20:49:59 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/63f1e96b/8b35827a.mp3" length="3759463" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>235</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we cover 1 Appellate court decision

 ⁠Murphy vs. Clinton ⁠

Hosts: 
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠
⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we cover 1 Appellate court decision

 ⁠Murphy vs. Clinton ⁠

Hosts: 
⁠Criminal Law: Jay Ruane, Ruane Attorneys ⁠⁠⁠
⁠Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm ⁠⁠⁠</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of April 6, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of April 6, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca9e8a2e-27c9-44db-8299-7c96581bb594</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/461123be</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP166.pdf">AC42807</a> - State v. Lyons</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR85.pdf">SC20358</a> - State v. Ramon A. G.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR235.pdf">SC20327</a> - Lafferty v. Jones</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR18.pdf">SC20335</a> - State v. Davis</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP166.pdf">AC42807</a> - State v. Lyons</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR85.pdf">SC20358</a> - State v. Ramon A. G.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR235.pdf">SC20327</a> - Lafferty v. Jones</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR18.pdf">SC20335</a> - State v. Davis</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/461123be/cb197ef0.mp3" length="37826484" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2365</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss:

 AC42807 - State v. Lyons
 SC20358 - State v. Ramon A. G.
  SC20327 - Lafferty v. Jones
  SC20335 - State v. Davis

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss:

 AC42807 - State v. Lyons
 SC20358 - State v. Ramon A. G.
  SC20327 - Lafferty v. Jones
  SC20335 - State v. Davis

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 30, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 30, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eeeaf34d-2d75-40c7-89b3-fb746009269c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/98461943</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP165.pdf">AC43293</a> - Mecca v. Mecca</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP166.pdf">AC42807</a> - State v. Lyons</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP167.pdf">AC41858</a> - Carten v. Carten</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR85.pdf">SC20358</a> - State v. Ramon A. G.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR18.pdf">SC20335</a> - State v. Davis<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP165.pdf">AC43293</a> - Mecca v. Mecca</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP166.pdf">AC42807</a> - State v. Lyons</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP167.pdf">AC41858</a> - Carten v. Carten</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR85.pdf">SC20358</a> - State v. Ramon A. G.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR18.pdf">SC20335</a> - State v. Davis<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/98461943/8653a22f.mp3" length="61603347" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3851</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss:

 AC43293 - Mecca v. Mecca
 AC42807 - State v. Lyons
 AC41858 - Carten v. Carten
 SC20358 - State v. Ramon A. G.
  SC20335 - State v. Davis


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss:

 AC43293 - Mecca v. Mecca
 AC42807 - State v. Lyons
 AC41858 - Carten v. Carten
 SC20358 - State v. Ramon A. G.
  SC20335 - State v. Davis


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Famil</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 16, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 16, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d5e59a7b-fbe7-4185-8596-01926ac9c1db</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f89ca5ed</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP148.pdf">AC42332</a> - Houghtaling v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP151.pdf">AC42554</a> - Berman v. Berman</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP152.pdf">AC43166</a> - Stephenson v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP154.pdf">AC43051</a> - State v. Capasso<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP148.pdf">AC42332</a> - Houghtaling v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP151.pdf">AC42554</a> - Berman v. Berman</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP152.pdf">AC43166</a> - Stephenson v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP154.pdf">AC43051</a> - State v. Capasso<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:57:01 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f89ca5ed/d1d3fc07.mp3" length="61131470" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3821</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss:

 AC42332 - Houghtaling v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC42554 - Berman v. Berman
  AC43166 - Stephenson v. Commissioner of Correction
  AC43051 - State v. Capasso


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss:

 AC42332 - Houghtaling v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC42554 - Berman v. Berman
  AC43166 - Stephenson v. Commissioner of Correction
  AC43051 - State v. Capasso


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McK</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 9, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 9, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7960c4e4-fce3-4da0-802f-445e3aada200</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/cfcd1a06</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR134.pdf">SC20125</a> - State v. Joseph A.</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP127.pdf">AC44174</a> -  Bouffard v. Lewis</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP132.pdf">AC43084</a> - State v. Russaw</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP133.pdf">AC42446</a> - Velez v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP136.pdf">AC43011</a> - Pascola-Milton v. Millard</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP150.pdf">AC42574</a> - State v. Hall-George<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR134.pdf">SC20125</a> - State v. Joseph A.</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP127.pdf">AC44174</a> -  Bouffard v. Lewis</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP132.pdf">AC43084</a> - State v. Russaw</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP133.pdf">AC42446</a> - Velez v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP136.pdf">AC43011</a> - Pascola-Milton v. Millard</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP150.pdf">AC42574</a> - State v. Hall-George<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:47:14 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/cfcd1a06/3817f43a.mp3" length="72005095" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>4501</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss:

 SC20125 - State v. Joseph A.
 AC44174 -  Bouffard v. Lewis
 AC43084 - State v. Russaw
 AC42446 - Velez v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC43011 - Pascola-Milton v. Millard
 AC42574 - State v. Hall-George


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss:

 SC20125 - State v. Joseph A.
 AC44174 -  Bouffard v. Lewis
 AC43084 - State v. Russaw
 AC42446 - Velez v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC43011 - Pascola-Milton v. Millard
 AC42574 - State v. Hall-George


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan La</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of March 3, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of March 3, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93475681-8c9b-464b-88da-617493a02fc3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3ab9c39d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP113.pdf">AC44298</a> - Ricketts v. Ricketts</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP124.pdf">AC42713</a> - Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR136.pdf">SC20206</a> - State v. Ruiz-Pacheco</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP113.pdf">AC44298</a> - Ricketts v. Ricketts</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/ap203/203AP124.pdf">AC42713</a> - Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR336/336CR136.pdf">SC20206</a> - State v. Ruiz-Pacheco</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:36:51 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3ab9c39d/5b3ce4b4.mp3" length="33097275" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2069</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss:

 AC44298 - Ricketts v. Ricketts
 AC42713 - Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction
  SC20206 - State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss:

 AC44298 - Ricketts v. Ricketts
 AC42713 - Donald G. v. Commissioner of Correction
  SC20206 - State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Ri</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Special Episode: Discussing State v. Gomes with Attorney Lisa Steele</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Special Episode: Discussing State v. Gomes with Attorney Lisa Steele</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5c10d1b-7e22-4956-b83b-270487938fe5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9dbab343</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week in a special episode of the CT Caselaw Podcast, <strong>Attorney Dan Lage</strong> takes some time to sit down with <strong>Attorney Lisa Steele</strong> to discuss the recently released <strong>State v Gomes</strong> decision and her role in the case. In Gomes, released at the end of January 2021 by the Connecticut Supreme Court, a new trial was ordered in a case where defense counsel requested a jury instruction about inadequate investigation by police. </p>
<p>Listen in as Dan and Lisa do live decision analysis of the case which includes her insight and some interesting behind the scenes material. Then they discuss why Gomes changes the game for trial lawyers in how they should approach an investigation.</p>
<p><a href="https://members.nacdl.org/online-store/merchandise-details/?action=view&amp;id=5edbff46-e3c2-ea11-bf21-0003ff529006">Get Lisa's Book</a> : <a href="https://members.nacdl.org/online-store/merchandise-details/?action=view&amp;id=5edbff46-e3c2-ea11-bf21-0003ff529006">"Defense Counsel's Playbook for Eyewitness ID Cases</a>"</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week in a special episode of the CT Caselaw Podcast, <strong>Attorney Dan Lage</strong> takes some time to sit down with <strong>Attorney Lisa Steele</strong> to discuss the recently released <strong>State v Gomes</strong> decision and her role in the case. In Gomes, released at the end of January 2021 by the Connecticut Supreme Court, a new trial was ordered in a case where defense counsel requested a jury instruction about inadequate investigation by police. </p>
<p>Listen in as Dan and Lisa do live decision analysis of the case which includes her insight and some interesting behind the scenes material. Then they discuss why Gomes changes the game for trial lawyers in how they should approach an investigation.</p>
<p><a href="https://members.nacdl.org/online-store/merchandise-details/?action=view&amp;id=5edbff46-e3c2-ea11-bf21-0003ff529006">Get Lisa's Book</a> : <a href="https://members.nacdl.org/online-store/merchandise-details/?action=view&amp;id=5edbff46-e3c2-ea11-bf21-0003ff529006">"Defense Counsel's Playbook for Eyewitness ID Cases</a>"</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:24:54 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9dbab343/463b8d7d.mp3" length="66195927" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>4138</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week in a special episode of the CT Caselaw Podcast, Attorney Dan Lage takes some time to sit down with Attorney Lisa Steele to discuss the recently released State v Gomes decision and her role in the case. In Gomes, released at the end of January 2021 by the Connecticut Supreme Court, a new trial was ordered in a case where defense counsel requested a jury instruction about inadequate investigation by police. 
Listen in as Dan and Lisa do live decision analysis of the case which includes her insight and some interesting behind the scenes material. Then they discuss why Gomes changes the game for trial lawyers in how they should approach an investigation.
Get Lisa's Book : "Defense Counsel's Playbook for Eyewitness ID Cases"
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week in a special episode of the CT Caselaw Podcast, Attorney Dan Lage takes some time to sit down with Attorney Lisa Steele to discuss the recently released State v Gomes decision and her role in the case. In Gomes, released at the end of January 20</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weeks of February 16 and February 23, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Weeks of February 16 and February 23, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d1a055c-4221-493f-9245-00d9821368a6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9f27c177</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP109.pdf">AC43500</a> - State v. Sayles</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP104.pdf">AC42890</a> - Godfrey v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP111.pdf">AC42685</a> - Fronsaglia v. Fronsaglia</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP112.pdf">AC42785</a> - Collins v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
</ul>
<p>Tune in for a special episode this week with an Interview of Attorney Lisa Steele regarding the <strong>State v. Gomes</strong> case</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP109.pdf">AC43500</a> - State v. Sayles</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP104.pdf">AC42890</a> - Godfrey v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP111.pdf">AC42685</a> - Fronsaglia v. Fronsaglia</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP112.pdf">AC42785</a> - Collins v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
</ul>
<p>Tune in for a special episode this week with an Interview of Attorney Lisa Steele regarding the <strong>State v. Gomes</strong> case</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 20:34:05 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9f27c177/7f9b3665.mp3" length="83986334" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>5250</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we cover:

 AC43500 - State v. Sayles
 AC42890 - Godfrey v. Commissioner of Correction
  AC42685 - Fronsaglia v. Fronsaglia
  AC42785 - Collins v. Commissioner of Correction

Tune in for a special episode this week with an Interview of Attorney Lisa Steele regarding the State v. Gomes case
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we cover:

 AC43500 - State v. Sayles
 AC42890 - Godfrey v. Commissioner of Correction
  AC42685 - Fronsaglia v. Fronsaglia
  AC42785 - Collins v. Commissioner of Correction

Tune in for a special episode this week with an Interview of Att</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weeks of February 2 and February 9, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Weeks of February 2 and February 9, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b9afdd7-d83d-4efe-97fa-cf68daefac50</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9aed3bea</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>With just a few on-topic cases these snowy weeks of winter, the podcast combined 2 weeks this week to feature the following:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP95.pdf">AC42308</a> - State v. Njoku</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP103.pdf">AC43214</a> - Felder v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP105.pdf">AC43122</a> - Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
</ul>
<p>Tune in for a special episode next week with an Interview of Attorney Lisa Steele regarding the <strong>State v. Gomes</strong> case</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With just a few on-topic cases these snowy weeks of winter, the podcast combined 2 weeks this week to feature the following:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP95.pdf">AC42308</a> - State v. Njoku</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP103.pdf">AC43214</a> - Felder v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP105.pdf">AC43122</a> - Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
</ul>
<p>Tune in for a special episode next week with an Interview of Attorney Lisa Steele regarding the <strong>State v. Gomes</strong> case</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:45:56 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9aed3bea/4325ca1d.mp3" length="31185966" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1949</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>With just a few on-topic cases these snowy weeks of winter, the podcast combined 2 weeks this week to feature the following:

 AC42308 - State v. Njoku
 AC43214 - Felder v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC43122 - Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction

Tune in for a special episode next week with an Interview of Attorney Lisa Steele regarding the State v. Gomes case
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>With just a few on-topic cases these snowy weeks of winter, the podcast combined 2 weeks this week to feature the following:

 AC42308 - State v. Njoku
 AC43214 - Felder v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC43122 - Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction

Tune </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 25, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 25, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a4ddb7d7-175f-4e68-8c94-328c03dbd199</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1b5df219</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP77.pdf">AC40953</a> - State v. Williams</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP80.pdf">AC42327</a> - State v. Edwards</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP83.pdf">AC42481</a> - State v. Ferrazzano-Mazza</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP88.pdf">AC42705</a> - Rose v. Commissioner of Correction<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP77.pdf">AC40953</a> - State v. Williams</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP80.pdf">AC42327</a> - State v. Edwards</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP83.pdf">AC42481</a> - State v. Ferrazzano-Mazza</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP88.pdf">AC42705</a> - Rose v. Commissioner of Correction<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 14:08:59 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1b5df219/8161d546.mp3" length="60201931" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3763</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we cover

 AC40953 - State v. Williams
 AC42327 - State v. Edwards
  AC42481 - State v. Ferrazzano-Mazza
  AC42705 - Rose v. Commissioner of Correction


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover

 AC40953 - State v. Williams
 AC42327 - State v. Edwards
  AC42481 - State v. Ferrazzano-Mazza
  AC42705 - Rose v. Commissioner of Correction


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Fir</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 18, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 18, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8844a59c-4ce1-4455-b837-a1b078090c11</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a03a48fe</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP62.pdf">AC42140</a> - Figueroa v. Commissioner of Correction<br>
<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP62.pdf">AC42140</a> - Figueroa v. Commissioner of Correction<br>
<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:45:38 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a03a48fe/af25a53b.mp3" length="26553709" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1660</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we cover

 AC42140 - Figueroa v. Commissioner of Correction



Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover

 AC42140 - Figueroa v. Commissioner of Correction



Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of January 4, 2021</title>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>2</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of January 4, 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b995ac7c-1db7-4edc-b623-e348f87a1dbb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9b263d62</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP43.pdf">AC41587</a> - State v. Mansfield</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP54.pdf">AC42456</a> - State v. Qayyum</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP61.pdf">AC41482</a> - State v. Ervin B.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP71.pdf">AC42932</a> - Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP43.pdf">AC41587</a> - State v. Mansfield</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP54.pdf">AC42456</a> - State v. Qayyum</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP61.pdf">AC41482</a> - State v. Ervin B.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP202/202AP71.pdf">AC42932</a> - Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2021 16:00:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9b263d62/931b9353.mp3" length="83605972" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>5226</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we cover

 AC41587 - State v. Mansfield
 AC42456 - State v. Qayyum
  AC41482 - State v. Ervin B.
  AC42932 - Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover

 AC41587 - State v. Mansfield
 AC42456 - State v. Qayyum
  AC41482 - State v. Ervin B.
  AC42932 - Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Fami</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 28, 2020: The Top Tort Law Cases of 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 28, 2020: The Top Tort Law Cases of 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c52d5372-2654-4368-b8bb-cf3f75356dea</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/77a7f201</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, <strong>Attorney Ryan McKeen</strong> recaps a landmark year in the area of municipal liability in Tort Law cases.<br>
</p>
<p>Host: Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, <strong>Attorney Ryan McKeen</strong> recaps a landmark year in the area of municipal liability in Tort Law cases.<br>
</p>
<p>Host: Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 15:00:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/77a7f201/7047a08d.mp3" length="76970487" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>4811</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Ryan McKeen recaps a landmark year in the area of municipal liability in Tort Law cases.

Host: Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Ryan McKeen recaps a landmark year in the area of municipal liability in Tort Law cases.

Host: Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Family Law: Rich </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 21, 2020: The Top 5 Family Law Cases of 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 21, 2020: The Top 5 Family Law Cases of 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2807e0bb-296b-4c49-ad7e-ab1e0379ffdc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2daf64da</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Rich Rochlin recaps 5 important family law cases for you to know that were released in 2020.

 SC20058 - Puff v. Puff
 AC42333 - Barr v. Barr
 AC40934 - Halperin v. Halperin
 AC42635 - Fazio v. Fazio
 AC42539 - Leonova v. Leonov

Podcast Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Rich Rochlin recaps 5 important family law cases for you to know that were released in 2020.

 SC20058 - Puff v. Puff
 AC42333 - Barr v. Barr
 AC40934 - Halperin v. Halperin
 AC42635 - Fazio v. Fazio
 AC42539 - Leonova v. Leonov

Podcast Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 15:48:38 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2daf64da/b81b21d4.mp3" length="56607520" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3538</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Rich Rochlin recaps 5 important family law cases for you to know that were released in 2020.

 SC20058 - Puff v. Puff
 AC42333 - Barr v. Barr
 AC40934 - Halperin v. Halperin
 AC42635 - Fazio v. Fazio
 AC42539 - Leonova v. Leonov

Podcast Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Rich Rochlin recaps 5 important family law cases for you to know that were released in 2020.

 SC20058 - Puff v. Puff
 AC42333 - Barr v. Barr
 AC40934 - Halperin v. Halperin
 AC42635 - Fazio v</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 14, 2020: The Top 5 Criminal Cases of 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 14, 2020: The Top 5 Criminal Cases of 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">346c906e-c457-4083-b3f4-96860147523b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8373d0c6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, <strong>Attorney Dan Lage</strong> recaps 5 important cases for you to know that were released in 2020.</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR167.pdf">SC18190</a> - State v. Ashby</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR167A.pdf">SC18190 Concurrence and Dissent</a> - State v. Ashby</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR334/334CR14.pdf">SC20193</a> - State v. Jackson</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR334/334CR95.pdf">SC20083</a> - State v. Lebrick</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR334/334CR95D.pdf">SC20083 Concurrence and Dissent</a> - State v. Lebrick</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR84.pdf">SC20183</a> - State v. Raynor</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR84A.pdf">SC20183 Concurrence</a> - State v. Raynor</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP197/197AP250.pdf">AC42115</a> - State v. Taupier</li>
</ul>
<p>Host:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Be sure to tune in next week for the Top 5 Personal Injury Cases of 2020 hosted by Ryan McKeen, then we end the year with the Top 5 Family cases with Rich Rochlin.</strong></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, <strong>Attorney Dan Lage</strong> recaps 5 important cases for you to know that were released in 2020.</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR167.pdf">SC18190</a> - State v. Ashby</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR167A.pdf">SC18190 Concurrence and Dissent</a> - State v. Ashby</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR334/334CR14.pdf">SC20193</a> - State v. Jackson</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR334/334CR95.pdf">SC20083</a> - State v. Lebrick</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR334/334CR95D.pdf">SC20083 Concurrence and Dissent</a> - State v. Lebrick</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR84.pdf">SC20183</a> - State v. Raynor</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR84A.pdf">SC20183 Concurrence</a> - State v. Raynor</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP197/197AP250.pdf">AC42115</a> - State v. Taupier</li>
</ul>
<p>Host:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Be sure to tune in next week for the Top 5 Personal Injury Cases of 2020 hosted by Ryan McKeen, then we end the year with the Top 5 Family cases with Rich Rochlin.</strong></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 03:22:37 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8373d0c6/1b36483d.mp3" length="110977738" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>6936</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Dan Lage recaps 5 important cases for you to know that were released in 2020.

 SC18190 - State v. Ashby
 SC18190 Concurrence and Dissent - State v. Ashby
  SC20193 - State v. Jackson
  SC20083 - State v. Lebrick
  SC20083 Concurrence and Dissent - State v. Lebrick
  SC20183 - State v. Raynor
  SC20183 Concurrence - State v. Raynor
  AC42115 - State v. Taupier

Host:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Be sure to tune in next week for the Top 5 Personal Injury Cases of 2020 hosted by Ryan McKeen, then we end the year with the Top 5 Family cases with Rich Rochlin.
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week, in a break from our normal weekly rundown, Attorney Dan Lage recaps 5 important cases for you to know that were released in 2020.

 SC18190 - State v. Ashby
 SC18190 Concurrence and Dissent - State v. Ashby
  SC20193 - State v. Jackson
  SC2008</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of December 7, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of December 7, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d35382e-887c-45d9-bb30-e90ac3516445</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4ecf3463</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP48.pdf">AC43322</a> - Kondjoua v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP391.pdf">AC42031</a> - Tunick v. Tunick</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR33.pdf">SC20277</a> - State v. Rivera</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP40.pdf">AC42951</a> - Vaccaro v. Loscalzo</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR84.pdf">SC20183</a> - State v. Raynor</li>
</ul>
<p>In this very special episode Attorney Dan Lage interview appellant's counsel in State v. Raynor, <a href="https://kirschbaumlaw.com/people/andrew-oshea">Andrew O'Shea</a> in the last segment of the show.</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p>Special Guest Host: <a href="https://drappjaumann.com/Attorney-john-drapp">Connecticut Estate Lawyer John Drapp</a> covers the Tunick case.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cover</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP48.pdf">AC43322</a> - Kondjoua v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP391.pdf">AC42031</a> - Tunick v. Tunick</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR33.pdf">SC20277</a> - State v. Rivera</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP40.pdf">AC42951</a> - Vaccaro v. Loscalzo</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR84.pdf">SC20183</a> - State v. Raynor</li>
</ul>
<p>In this very special episode Attorney Dan Lage interview appellant's counsel in State v. Raynor, <a href="https://kirschbaumlaw.com/people/andrew-oshea">Andrew O'Shea</a> in the last segment of the show.</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p>Special Guest Host: <a href="https://drappjaumann.com/Attorney-john-drapp">Connecticut Estate Lawyer John Drapp</a> covers the Tunick case.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:27:17 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4ecf3463/97a95212.mp3" length="94243871" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>5891</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we cover

 AC43322 - Kondjoua v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC42031 - Tunick v. Tunick
  SC20277 - State v. Rivera
  AC42951 - Vaccaro v. Loscalzo
  SC20183 - State v. Raynor

In this very special episode Attorney Dan Lage interview appellant's counsel in State v. Raynor, Andrew O'Shea in the last segment of the show.
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
Special Guest Host: Connecticut Estate Lawyer John Drapp covers the Tunick case.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover

 AC43322 - Kondjoua v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC42031 - Tunick v. Tunick
  SC20277 - State v. Rivera
  AC42951 - Vaccaro v. Loscalzo
  SC20183 - State v. Raynor

In this very special episode Attorney Dan Lage interview appe</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 30, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 30, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3614a53-c757-484c-82c8-fd025c101138</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/75d2f715</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP35.pdf">AC43014</a> - State v. Freeman</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP39.pdf">AC43016</a> - State v. Han</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29.pdf">SC20170</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29A.pdf">SC20170 Concurrence</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP35.pdf">AC43014</a> - State v. Freeman</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP39.pdf">AC43016</a> - State v. Han</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29.pdf">SC20170</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29A.pdf">SC20170 Concurrence</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.<br>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 14:18:34 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/75d2f715/b0c0b81b.mp3" length="37046157" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2316</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC43014 - State v. Freeman
 AC43016 - State v. Han
 SC20170 - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
 SC20170 Concurrence - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC43014 - State v. Freeman
 AC43016 - State v. Han
 SC20170 - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
 SC20170 Concurrence - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law:</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 23, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 23, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62c4cc3e-86c3-49c7-952d-0dbf7bec57fc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3a3975b5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Happy Thanksgiving!</strong></p>
<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP31.pdf">AC43344</a> - State v. Parker</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP34.pdf">AC41168, AC41644</a> - State v. Knox</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP390.pdf">AC42567</a> - Doe v. Flanigan</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29.pdf">SC20170</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29A.pdf">SC20170 Concurrence</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Happy Thanksgiving!</strong></p>
<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP31.pdf">AC43344</a> - State v. Parker</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP34.pdf">AC41168, AC41644</a> - State v. Knox</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP390.pdf">AC42567</a> - Doe v. Flanigan</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29.pdf">SC20170</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR29A.pdf">SC20170 Concurrence</a> - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:59:14 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3a3975b5/acd9612c.mp3" length="56679790" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3543</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Happy Thanksgiving!
This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC43344 - State v. Parker
 AC41168, AC41644 - State v. Knox
  AC42567 - Doe v. Flanigan
  SC20170 - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
  SC20170 Concurrence - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Happy Thanksgiving!
This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC43344 - State v. Parker
 AC41168, AC41644 - State v. Knox
  AC42567 - Doe v. Flanigan
  SC20170 - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
  SC20170 Concurrence - Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.

</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 16, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 16, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a1b08b1-9262-4047-86d8-2b54c860e68c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a588bb6d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP24.pdf">AC43170</a> - Wright v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP26.pdf">AC41785</a> - State v. Lemanski</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP30.pdf">AC42763</a> - State v. Sebben</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP388.pdf">AC42539</a> - Leonova v. Leonov</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST</strong><br>
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on <a href="https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8yYWUxMTM0MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast/id1535076647">Apple Podcasts</a>, or <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1Q1sHjS5DhZnBZTwsc91zy">Spotify</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP24.pdf">AC43170</a> - Wright v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP26.pdf">AC41785</a> - State v. Lemanski</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP30.pdf">AC42763</a> - State v. Sebben</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP388.pdf">AC42539</a> - Leonova v. Leonov</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST</strong><br>
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on <a href="https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8yYWUxMTM0MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast/id1535076647">Apple Podcasts</a>, or <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1Q1sHjS5DhZnBZTwsc91zy">Spotify</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:00:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a588bb6d/a758cf2e.mp3" length="41979747" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2624</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode:

 AC43170 - Wright v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC41785 - State v. Lemanski
  AC42763 - State v. Sebben
  AC42539 - Leonova v. Leonov

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode:

 AC43170 - Wright v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC41785 - State v. Lemanski
  AC42763 - State v. Sebben
  AC42539 - Leonova v. Leonov

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Ric</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 9, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 9, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a356daae-8aa7-4227-8905-ecbfc6e5ea28</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/19076f22</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP28.pdf">AC43499</a> - State v. Gaston</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP19.pdf">AC39651</a> - Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR26.pdf">SC20384</a> - Foisie v. Foisie</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR20.pdf">SC20181</a> - Hall v. Hall</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP385.pdf">AC42778</a> - Gershon v. Back</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP27.pdf">AC42518</a> - Bevilacqua v. Bevilacqua</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR28.pdf">SC20200</a> - Boone v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST</strong></p>
<p>Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on <a href="https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8yYWUxMTM0MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast/id1535076647">Apple Podcasts</a>, or <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1Q1sHjS5DhZnBZTwsc91zy">Spotify</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP28.pdf">AC43499</a> - State v. Gaston</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP19.pdf">AC39651</a> - Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR26.pdf">SC20384</a> - Foisie v. Foisie</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR20.pdf">SC20181</a> - Hall v. Hall</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP385.pdf">AC42778</a> - Gershon v. Back</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP27.pdf">AC42518</a> - Bevilacqua v. Bevilacqua</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR28.pdf">SC20200</a> - Boone v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST</strong></p>
<p>Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on <a href="https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8yYWUxMTM0MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast/id1535076647">Apple Podcasts</a>, or <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1Q1sHjS5DhZnBZTwsc91zy">Spotify</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:30:45 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/19076f22/062a8650.mp3" length="64071397" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>4005</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC43499 - State v. Gaston
 AC39651 - Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction
  SC20384 - Foisie v. Foisie
  SC20181 - Hall v. Hall
  AC42778 - Gershon v. Back
  AC42518 - Bevilacqua v. Bevilacqua
  SC20200 - Boone v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC43499 - State v. Gaston
 AC39651 - Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction
  SC20384 - Foisie v. Foisie
  SC20181 - Hall v. Hall
  AC42778 - Gershon v. Back
  AC42518 - Bevilacqua v. Bevilacqua
  SC20200 - Boone v.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of November 2, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of November 2, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7857639a-11ce-4089-aed2-5725d63947da</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/95e4bd6c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode<br>
</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP389.pdf">AC41802</a> - State v. Schimanski</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP17.pdf">AC42437</a> - Turner v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR25.pdf">SC20344</a> - Wolfork v. Yale Medical Group</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP200/200AP377.pdf">AC42765</a> - Costanzo v. Plainfield</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR23.pdf">SC20390</a> -  Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>*Special Guest Appearance by </strong><a href="https://thelicenselawyers.com/attorneys/attorney-dennis-mancini/"><strong>Attorney Dennis Mancini</strong></a><strong> covering a Professional License Case</strong></p>
<p>SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST<br>
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on <a href="https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8yYWUxMTM0MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast/id1535076647">Apple Podcasts</a>, or <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1Q1sHjS5DhZnBZTwsc91zy">Spotify</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode<br>
</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP389.pdf">AC41802</a> - State v. Schimanski</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP17.pdf">AC42437</a> - Turner v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR25.pdf">SC20344</a> - Wolfork v. Yale Medical Group</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP200/200AP377.pdf">AC42765</a> - Costanzo v. Plainfield</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR23.pdf">SC20390</a> -  Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>*Special Guest Appearance by </strong><a href="https://thelicenselawyers.com/attorneys/attorney-dennis-mancini/"><strong>Attorney Dennis Mancini</strong></a><strong> covering a Professional License Case</strong></p>
<p>SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST<br>
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on <a href="https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8yYWUxMTM0MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connecticut-caselaw-podcast/id1535076647">Apple Podcasts</a>, or <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1Q1sHjS5DhZnBZTwsc91zy">Spotify</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:16:05 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/95e4bd6c/951f1c5d.mp3" length="69419602" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>4339</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode


 AC41802 - State v. Schimanski
 AC42437 - Turner v. Commissioner of Correction
 SC20344 - Wolfork v. Yale Medical Group
 AC42765 - Costanzo v. Plainfield
  SC20390 -  Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller


Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
*Special Guest Appearance by Attorney Dennis Mancini covering a Professional License Case
SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST
Sharing and subscribing are great ways to help us to get the word out about the show. If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share and subscribe on Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode


 AC41802 - State v. Schimanski
 AC42437 - Turner v. Commissioner of Correction
 SC20344 - Wolfork v. Yale Medical Group
 AC42765 - Costanzo v. Plainfield
  SC20390 -  Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller


Hosts:
Criminal Law: </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 26, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 26, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea875161-3b0a-439d-a1a4-493445a29de3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/339d02e9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following recently released cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li>State v. Hazard <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP386.pdf">AC43384</a></li>
 <li>In Re Xavier H. <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP16.pdf">AC43770, AC43774</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following recently released cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li>State v. Hazard <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP386.pdf">AC43384</a></li>
 <li>In Re Xavier H. <a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP16.pdf">AC43770, AC43774</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:05:18 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/339d02e9/e7ea3077.mp3" length="32189888" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2012</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss the following recently released cases:

 State v. Hazard AC43384
 In Re Xavier H. AC43770, AC43774

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss the following recently released cases:

 State v. Hazard AC43384
 In Re Xavier H. AC43770, AC43774

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 19, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 19, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c39399f7-43a2-4dae-abc7-01acdb216a07</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/34d00071</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP383.pdf">AC42515</a> - Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP200/200AP374.pdf">AC41869</a> - State v. Pjura</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP384.pdf">AC42703</a> - State v. Anderson</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR21.pdf">SC20341</a> - State v. Kosuda-Bigazzi</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR57.pdf">SC20425</a> - Cole v. New Haven</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Index:</p>
<p>01:04 - Criminal Law cases</p>
<p>55:19 - Injury Law cases</p>
<p>1:03 - Family Law cases</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP383.pdf">AC42515</a> - Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP200/200AP374.pdf">AC41869</a> - State v. Pjura</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP201/201AP384.pdf">AC42703</a> - State v. Anderson</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR21.pdf">SC20341</a> - State v. Kosuda-Bigazzi</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR335/335CR57.pdf">SC20425</a> - Cole v. New Haven</li>
</ul>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/"><strong>Dan Lage</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/"><strong>Ruane Attorneys</strong></a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/"><strong>Ryan McKeen</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/"><strong>CT Trial Firm</strong></a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/"><strong>Rich Rochlin</strong></a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/"><strong>Rich Rochlin Law</strong></a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Index:</p>
<p>01:04 - Criminal Law cases</p>
<p>55:19 - Injury Law cases</p>
<p>1:03 - Family Law cases</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/34d00071/58ec6858.mp3" length="60771609" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3799</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC42515 - Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC41869 - State v. Pjura
  AC42703 - State v. Anderson
  SC20341 - State v. Kosuda-Bigazzi
  SC20425 - Cole v. New Haven

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law

Index:
01:04 - Criminal Law cases
55:19 - Injury Law cases
1:03 - Family Law cases</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss the following cases:

 AC42515 - Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction
 AC41869 - State v. Pjura
  AC42703 - State v. Anderson
  SC20341 - State v. Kosuda-Bigazzi
  SC20425 - Cole v. New Haven

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane At</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week of October 12, 2020</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Week of October 12, 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39545fcf-a689-40c0-9737-3bac29a27df7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1f819753</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<p>Casighiri v. Casighiri</p>
<p>Ross v. Ross</p>
<p>Harvey vs DOC</p>
<p>State v. Rhodes</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/">Dan Lage</a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Ruane Attorneys</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">Ryan McKeen</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/">CT Trial Firm</a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/">Rich Rochlin</a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/">Rich Rochlin Law</a></p>
<p>Index:</p>
<p>01:30 - <strong>Injury Law Cases</strong></p>
<p>06:10 - <strong>Criminal Law Cases </strong></p>
<p>21:21 - <strong>Family Law cases</strong></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Watch on Youtube: https://youtu.be/DM0jlz5ZNbE</p>
<p>Sponsor:</p>
<p>Social Media Marketing For Lawyers <a href="https://www.getfirmflex.com/">GetFirmFlex.com</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we discuss the following cases:</p>
<p>Casighiri v. Casighiri</p>
<p>Ross v. Ross</p>
<p>Harvey vs DOC</p>
<p>State v. Rhodes</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/">Dan Lage</a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/">Ruane Attorneys</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">Ryan McKeen</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com/">CT Trial Firm</a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/">Rich Rochlin</a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/">Rich Rochlin Law</a></p>
<p>Index:</p>
<p>01:30 - <strong>Injury Law Cases</strong></p>
<p>06:10 - <strong>Criminal Law Cases </strong></p>
<p>21:21 - <strong>Family Law cases</strong></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Watch on Youtube: https://youtu.be/DM0jlz5ZNbE</p>
<p>Sponsor:</p>
<p>Social Media Marketing For Lawyers <a href="https://www.getfirmflex.com/">GetFirmFlex.com</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1f819753/5f371034.mp3" length="33955348" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2123</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week we discuss the following cases:
Casighiri v. Casighiri
Ross v. Ross
Harvey vs DOC
State v. Rhodes

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
Index:
01:30 - Injury Law Cases
06:10 - Criminal Law Cases 
21:21 - Family Law cases

Watch on Youtube: https://youtu.be/DM0jlz5ZNbE
Sponsor:
Social Media Marketing For Lawyers GetFirmFlex.com</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week we discuss the following cases:
Casighiri v. Casighiri
Ross v. Ross
Harvey vs DOC
State v. Rhodes

Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
Index:
01:30 - In</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>September 2020 Connecticut Supreme Court Recap</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>September 2020 Connecticut Supreme Court Recap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7011b19c-33a6-40ec-a4e4-e1565df0864a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/55888bbd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we recap the Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions in September 2020.</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/">Dan Lage</a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com">Ruane Attorneys</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">Ryan McKeen</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com">CT Trial Firm</a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/">Rich Rochlin</a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/">Rich Rochlin Law</a></p>
<p>Index:</p>
<p>01:38 - Criminal Law cases</p>
<p>39:26 - Injury Law cases</p>
<p>48:15 - Family Law cases</p>
<p>Sponsor:</p>
<p>Social Media Marketing For Lawyers <a href="https://www.getfirmflex.com">GetFirmFlex.com</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode we recap the Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions in September 2020.</p>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p>Criminal Law: <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com/attorney/daniel-lage/">Dan Lage</a>, <a href="https://www.ruaneattorneys.com">Ruane Attorneys</a></p>
<p>Injury Law: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanmckeen/">Ryan McKeen</a>, <a href="https://www.cttrialfirm.com">CT Trial Firm</a></p>
<p>Family Law: <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/attorneys/rich-rochlin/">Rich Rochlin</a>, <a href="https://richrochlinlaw.com/">Rich Rochlin Law</a></p>
<p>Index:</p>
<p>01:38 - Criminal Law cases</p>
<p>39:26 - Injury Law cases</p>
<p>48:15 - Family Law cases</p>
<p>Sponsor:</p>
<p>Social Media Marketing For Lawyers <a href="https://www.getfirmflex.com">GetFirmFlex.com</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>James Ruane</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/55888bbd/1949ccba.mp3" length="52972513" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>James Ruane</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3311</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode we recap the Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions in September 2020.
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
Index:
01:38 - Criminal Law cases
39:26 - Injury Law cases
48:15 - Family Law cases
Sponsor:
Social Media Marketing For Lawyers GetFirmFlex.com</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode we recap the Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions in September 2020.
Hosts:
Criminal Law: Dan Lage, Ruane Attorneys
Injury Law: Ryan McKeen, CT Trial Firm
Family Law: Rich Rochlin, Rich Rochlin Law
Index:
01:38 - Criminal Law cases
39:26 - </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
