<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-btrmt-lectures" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>btrmt. lectures</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-btrmt-lectures</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>A brain scientist talking about (better) patterns of thought, of feeling, and of action. One pattern, one podcast—you see if it works for you. The btrmt. lectures, with Dr Dorian Minors. (btrmt.—said "betterment.")</description>
    <copyright>Dorian Minors</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>9d13779d-ad7c-5164-950d-a8318b60a773</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://btr.mt</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Science"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Dorian Minors</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/sL-eNAcjjhUcA8x6RtNJG-fa-jChYrhsMeU4OCWR4NI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS85Yjll/ODRkZTJhYzM1NzZh/ODgyMTBhZTBiNGFk/MjI3ZS5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>A brain scientist talking about (better) patterns of thought, of feeling, and of action. One pattern, one podcast—you see if it works for you. The btrmt. lectures, with Dr Dorian Minors. (btrmt.—said "betterment.")</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>A brain scientist talking about (better) patterns of thought, of feeling, and of action.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Dorian Minors</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Meditation isn't for everyone</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Meditation isn't for everyone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:199914283</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/386f0609</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Meditation is the one practice everyone agrees on. It’s on the NHS,
in schools, in every influencer’s guide to life, and the pitch is always
the same: good for you, good for everyone, can’t hurt. Two of those
three are false. It can hurt, it isn’t for everyone—and once you see
what it actually is underneath the cushion, you realise you’re probably
already doing it.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/meditation">Meditating for fun and
for profit</a> — the article that inspired this lecture.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/scientific-ritual-lecture">The
Scientific Ritual</a> — the first lecture in this arc, on science as a
belief system.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sages-and-wisdom-lecture">In Praise
of the Sage</a> — the second, on why we trust doctors the way we trust
gurus.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-context">Positive
Intelligence</a> — one of the wellbeing-program takedowns mentioned up
top.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">It’s not ‘just’ a
placebo</a> — on why “all in the head” is the point, not the
problem.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/brain-regions-to-networks">Not
brain regions, brain networks</a> — where the harms of mindfulness for
some populations come up again.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down-lecture">Overengineering
calming down</a> — the companion takedown of the calm-down-advice
genre.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/spirituality-of-the-mind">Spirituality of
Mind</a> — more on the contemplative tradition meditation was lifted
from.</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li>Farias, M. &amp; Wikholm, C. (2015). <em>The Buddha Pill: Can
Meditation Change You?</em> <a href="https://www.catherinewikholm.com/the-buddha-pill">Publisher
page</a>.</li>
<li>Van Dam, N. T., Targett, J., Davies, J. N., Burger, A. &amp;
Galante, J. (2025). Incidence and predictors of meditation-related
unusual experiences and adverse effects in a representative sample of
meditators in the United States. <em>Clinical Psychological
Science.</em> <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026241298269">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Schlosser, M., Sparby, T., Vörös, S., Jones, R. &amp; Marchant, N.
L. (2019). Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular
meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations.
<em>PLOS ONE.</em> <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216643">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Lindahl, J. R., Fisher, N. E., Cooper, D. J., Rosen, R. K. &amp;
Britton, W. B. (2017). The varieties of contemplative experience: A
mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western
Buddhists. <em>PLOS ONE.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176239">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Farias, M., Maraldi, E., Wallenkampf, K. C. &amp; Lucchetti, G.
(2020). Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation-based
therapies: A systematic review. <em>Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica.</em>
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13225">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine
for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness
meditation. <em>General Hospital Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3">Article</a>.</li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Meditation is the one practice everyone agrees on. It’s on the NHS,
in schools, in every influencer’s guide to life, and the pitch is always
the same: good for you, good for everyone, can’t hurt. Two of those
three are false. It can hurt, it isn’t for everyone—and once you see
what it actually is underneath the cushion, you realise you’re probably
already doing it.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/meditation">Meditating for fun and
for profit</a> — the article that inspired this lecture.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/scientific-ritual-lecture">The
Scientific Ritual</a> — the first lecture in this arc, on science as a
belief system.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sages-and-wisdom-lecture">In Praise
of the Sage</a> — the second, on why we trust doctors the way we trust
gurus.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-context">Positive
Intelligence</a> — one of the wellbeing-program takedowns mentioned up
top.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">It’s not ‘just’ a
placebo</a> — on why “all in the head” is the point, not the
problem.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/brain-regions-to-networks">Not
brain regions, brain networks</a> — where the harms of mindfulness for
some populations come up again.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down-lecture">Overengineering
calming down</a> — the companion takedown of the calm-down-advice
genre.</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/spirituality-of-the-mind">Spirituality of
Mind</a> — more on the contemplative tradition meditation was lifted
from.</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li>Farias, M. &amp; Wikholm, C. (2015). <em>The Buddha Pill: Can
Meditation Change You?</em> <a href="https://www.catherinewikholm.com/the-buddha-pill">Publisher
page</a>.</li>
<li>Van Dam, N. T., Targett, J., Davies, J. N., Burger, A. &amp;
Galante, J. (2025). Incidence and predictors of meditation-related
unusual experiences and adverse effects in a representative sample of
meditators in the United States. <em>Clinical Psychological
Science.</em> <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026241298269">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Schlosser, M., Sparby, T., Vörös, S., Jones, R. &amp; Marchant, N.
L. (2019). Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular
meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations.
<em>PLOS ONE.</em> <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216643">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Lindahl, J. R., Fisher, N. E., Cooper, D. J., Rosen, R. K. &amp;
Britton, W. B. (2017). The varieties of contemplative experience: A
mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western
Buddhists. <em>PLOS ONE.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176239">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Farias, M., Maraldi, E., Wallenkampf, K. C. &amp; Lucchetti, G.
(2020). Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation-based
therapies: A systematic review. <em>Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica.</em>
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13225">Article</a>.</li>
<li>Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine
for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness
meditation. <em>General Hospital Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3">Article</a>.</li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 21:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/386f0609/6dfb1e7a.mp3" length="25222376" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/L12ZPA8kJrDNCe44btDsRmivi6VerHslEpDIwMoET6M/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xNWEw/MTA4Y2FlYjM0ZTU4/MmZjNzM1YTc2NDhi/ZGJkOC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1577</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Meditation can harm you, and it isn't for everyone. Strip the branding and it's just trained attention—half of what you already do—so the only real variable is what you point it at.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Meditation can harm you, and it isn't for everyone. Strip the branding and it's just trained attention—half of what you already do—so the only real variable is what you point it at.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/386f0609/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Praise of the Sage</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>In Praise of the Sage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:198074291</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d2cad85</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The modern Western story is that real knowledge comes from science or
careful reasoning, and anything else—the elder, the guru, the village
wise woman—is suspect. But science and reflection themselves rest on a
third, intuitive, embodied mode of knowing that we use constantly and
pretend we don’t. The doctor and the guru are running on the same
authority structure; the only difference is who’s allowed to wear the
coat. Which means we’re picking our sages by taste instead of
principle—and that’s how charlatans win.</p>
<p>Not sure what I’ve got against linen trousers in this episode. Quite
like them if I’m honest.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sages-and-wisdom">In praise of the
sage</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/scientific-ritual-lecture">The
scientific ritual (lecture)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/mundane-cults-lecture">Mundane
cults (lecture)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">It’s not ‘just’ a
placebo</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/drugs-are-tools">Useful
pharmacology</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/forer-effect">How some psychics use
psychology to screw you (Forer)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/enigma-of-ai-reason">AI
hallucination is just man-guessing</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/moral-blindspots">Moral
blindspots</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/successful-prophets">Successful
prophets</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is ideology</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/charismatic-leader-weber">The
charismatic leader (Weber)</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li>Aristotle, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics_%28Aristotle%29"><em>Metaphysics</em></a></li>
<li>John Dewey, <a href="https://openlibrary.org/books/OL23317067M/On_experience_nature_and_freedom"><em>Experience
and Nature</em></a></li>
<li>Richard Dawkins, <a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism/transcript?language=en"><em>TED:
Militant atheism</em></a></li>
<li>Bertram Forer, <a href="http://apsychoserver.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC621/Forer_The%20fallacy%20of%20personal%20validation_1949.pdf"><em>The
fallacy of personal validation</em></a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenotypic_screening">Phenotypic
drug discovery</a></li>
<li>Yann Martel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_of_Pi"><em>Life of
Pi</em></a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The modern Western story is that real knowledge comes from science or
careful reasoning, and anything else—the elder, the guru, the village
wise woman—is suspect. But science and reflection themselves rest on a
third, intuitive, embodied mode of knowing that we use constantly and
pretend we don’t. The doctor and the guru are running on the same
authority structure; the only difference is who’s allowed to wear the
coat. Which means we’re picking our sages by taste instead of
principle—and that’s how charlatans win.</p>
<p>Not sure what I’ve got against linen trousers in this episode. Quite
like them if I’m honest.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sages-and-wisdom">In praise of the
sage</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/scientific-ritual-lecture">The
scientific ritual (lecture)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/mundane-cults-lecture">Mundane
cults (lecture)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">It’s not ‘just’ a
placebo</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/drugs-are-tools">Useful
pharmacology</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/forer-effect">How some psychics use
psychology to screw you (Forer)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/enigma-of-ai-reason">AI
hallucination is just man-guessing</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/moral-blindspots">Moral
blindspots</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/successful-prophets">Successful
prophets</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is ideology</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/charismatic-leader-weber">The
charismatic leader (Weber)</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li>Aristotle, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics_%28Aristotle%29"><em>Metaphysics</em></a></li>
<li>John Dewey, <a href="https://openlibrary.org/books/OL23317067M/On_experience_nature_and_freedom"><em>Experience
and Nature</em></a></li>
<li>Richard Dawkins, <a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism/transcript?language=en"><em>TED:
Militant atheism</em></a></li>
<li>Bertram Forer, <a href="http://apsychoserver.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC621/Forer_The%20fallacy%20of%20personal%20validation_1949.pdf"><em>The
fallacy of personal validation</em></a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenotypic_screening">Phenotypic
drug discovery</a></li>
<li>Yann Martel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_of_Pi"><em>Life of
Pi</em></a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2d2cad85/7630e8a6.mp3" length="24105059" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_mCEUtR6wGTeHmLZFuzarbg5Eh_9N-nXrkdq3DI7VHk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS84NjAw/ZTZhYWIwMGU5ZTA5/ZDU5Zjg2YzgyMDBj/YTZmOC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2009</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The doctor and the guru run on the same authority structure. We just pick which one to trust by its costume. Choose by what sits under the coat or you lose to charlatans.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The doctor and the guru run on the same authority structure. We just pick which one to trust by its costume. Choose by what sits under the coat or you lose to charlatans.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d2cad85/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Scientific Ritual</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Scientific Ritual</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:196134515</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/43d4f968</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Science feels like the most reliable thing we have. The opposite of
belief. But it’s a belief system itself—a ritual, with all the failure
modes that rituals have. And the receipts are right there in the
replication crisis.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-scientific-ritual">The
Scientific Ritual</a> — the article this lecture is based on</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/p-values">Problems with
p-values</a> — the technical companion: Fisher, Neyman-Pearson, the
hybrid mess</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/problem-with-scientific-evidence">The trap
of scientific evidence</a> — on the “no evidence” tension and the
homeopathy/parachute paradox</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is ideology</a> — science as one belief system among several</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sages-and-wisdom">In praise of the
sage</a> — other ways of knowing; the MD/PhD distinction</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/scientific-fact">Scientific
fact</a> — on what science actually does</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/value-of-ritual">The value of
ritual</a> — ritual as a knowledge-production strategy</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/meditation">Meditation</a> — on the
dinner-table meditation example</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/dual-process-theories">Beyond
System 1 and System 2</a> — on Kahneman’s dual-process framework</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">The placebo
effect</a> — on why “works for some, not for others” is a feature, not a
bug</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/grit">Grit</a> —
positive-psychology critique</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down-lecture">Overengineering
calming down (lecture)</a> — the broader positive-psychology audit</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/bias-is-good-lecture">Bias is good
(lecture)</a> — the cognitive-bias series</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/life-is-worse-lecture">Life is
worse (lecture)</a> — the previous episode; a worked example of reading
a literature</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<h4>The replication crisis
itself
<ul>
<li>Open Science Collaboration (2015), <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716">Estimating
the reproducibility of psychological science</a>, <em>Science</em> 349
(6251)</li>
<li>Wikipedia: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis">replication
crisis</a></li>
<li>American Statistical Association: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913">Wasserstein,
Schirm &amp; Lazar (2019), Moving to a World Beyond “p &lt;
0.05”</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Statistical ritualism
<ul>
<li>Gerd Gigerenzer (2018), <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2515245918771329">Statistical
Rituals: The Replication Delusion and How We Got There</a>, <em>Advances
in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science</em></li>
<li>Philip B. Stark &amp; Andrea Saltelli (2018), <a href="https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01174.x">Cargo-cult
statistics and scientific crisis</a>, <em>Significance</em> 15 (4)</li>
<li>Andrew Gelman &amp; Eric Loken (2014), <a href="https://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/ForkingPaths.pdf">The
Statistical Crisis in Science</a> — the “garden of forking paths”
paper</li>
<li>Andrew Gelman, <a href="https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/02/26/why_i_dont_like/">Why
I don’t like so-called Bayesian hypothesis testing</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>p-values, Bayes factors,
and software
<ul>
<li>Wikipedia: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value">p-value</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes_factor">Bayes factor</a></li>
<li>Ronald A. Fisher (1925), <em>Statistical Methods for Research
Workers</em> — where the 5% threshold appears as an illustrative
example</li>
<li>Harold Jeffreys (1939), <em>Theory of Probability</em> — where the
Bayes-factor thresholds (BF &gt; 3 substantial, BF &gt; 10 strong) come
from</li>
<li><a href="https://jasp-stats.org/">JASP</a> — the open-source
Bayesian statistics software with default priors</li>
</ul>
<h4>Specific
replication-crisis casualties
<ul>
<li>Cuddy, Wilmuth &amp; Carney (2010) original <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_posing">power posing</a>
paper; Carney’s later <a href="https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/dana_carney/pdf_my%20position%20on%20power%20poses.pdf">statement</a>
withdrawing support</li>
<li>Hagger et al. (2016), <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691616652873">A
Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect</a></li>
<li>Bargh, Chen &amp; Burrows (1996) original <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology)#Replication_problems">elderly
priming</a> paper; failed <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029081">Doyen
et al. (2012)</a> replication</li>
<li>Brown, Sokal &amp; Friedman (2013), <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-24609-001">The Complex
Dynamics of Wishful Thinking</a> — demolishing the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_positivity_ratio">3:1
positivity ratio</a></li>
<li>Carol Dweck, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset#Fixed_and_growth_mindsets">growth
mindset</a> — replication concerns documented in Sisk et al. (2018) and
Bahník &amp; Vranka (2017)</li>
<li>Angela Duckworth, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grit_(personality_trait)">grit</a> —
meta-analytic critique in <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-30689-001">Credé, Tynan &amp;
Harms (2017)</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Books cited in the lecture
<ul>
<li>Daniel Kahneman, <em>Thinking, Fast and Slow</em></li>
<li>Stephen J. Gould, <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/946994.Adam_s_navel_and_other_essays"><em>Adam’s
Navel and Other Essays</em></a></li>
<li>Yann Martel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_of_Pi"><em>Life of
Pi</em></a></li>
<li>Bill Mollison, <em>Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual</em></li>
</ul>
<h4>Other
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism/transcript?language=en">Richard
Dawkins on militant atheism</a> (TED) — the “evidence vs. faith”
framing</li>
<li>Reform efforts: <a href="https://www.cos.io/initiatives/prereg">preregistration</a>, <a href="https://osf.io/">open data</a>, multi-lab replication consortia
(e.g. <a href="https://osf.io/wx7ck/">ManyLabs</a>)</li>
</ul></h4></h4></h4></h4></h4></h4></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Science feels like the most reliable thing we have. The opposite of
belief. But it’s a belief system itself—a ritual, with all the failure
modes that rituals have. And the receipts are right there in the
replication crisis.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-scientific-ritual">The
Scientific Ritual</a> — the article this lecture is based on</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/p-values">Problems with
p-values</a> — the technical companion: Fisher, Neyman-Pearson, the
hybrid mess</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/problem-with-scientific-evidence">The trap
of scientific evidence</a> — on the “no evidence” tension and the
homeopathy/parachute paradox</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is ideology</a> — science as one belief system among several</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sages-and-wisdom">In praise of the
sage</a> — other ways of knowing; the MD/PhD distinction</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/scientific-fact">Scientific
fact</a> — on what science actually does</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/value-of-ritual">The value of
ritual</a> — ritual as a knowledge-production strategy</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/meditation">Meditation</a> — on the
dinner-table meditation example</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/dual-process-theories">Beyond
System 1 and System 2</a> — on Kahneman’s dual-process framework</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">The placebo
effect</a> — on why “works for some, not for others” is a feature, not a
bug</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/grit">Grit</a> —
positive-psychology critique</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down-lecture">Overengineering
calming down (lecture)</a> — the broader positive-psychology audit</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/bias-is-good-lecture">Bias is good
(lecture)</a> — the cognitive-bias series</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/life-is-worse-lecture">Life is
worse (lecture)</a> — the previous episode; a worked example of reading
a literature</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<h4>The replication crisis
itself
<ul>
<li>Open Science Collaboration (2015), <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716">Estimating
the reproducibility of psychological science</a>, <em>Science</em> 349
(6251)</li>
<li>Wikipedia: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis">replication
crisis</a></li>
<li>American Statistical Association: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913">Wasserstein,
Schirm &amp; Lazar (2019), Moving to a World Beyond “p &lt;
0.05”</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Statistical ritualism
<ul>
<li>Gerd Gigerenzer (2018), <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2515245918771329">Statistical
Rituals: The Replication Delusion and How We Got There</a>, <em>Advances
in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science</em></li>
<li>Philip B. Stark &amp; Andrea Saltelli (2018), <a href="https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01174.x">Cargo-cult
statistics and scientific crisis</a>, <em>Significance</em> 15 (4)</li>
<li>Andrew Gelman &amp; Eric Loken (2014), <a href="https://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/ForkingPaths.pdf">The
Statistical Crisis in Science</a> — the “garden of forking paths”
paper</li>
<li>Andrew Gelman, <a href="https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/02/26/why_i_dont_like/">Why
I don’t like so-called Bayesian hypothesis testing</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>p-values, Bayes factors,
and software
<ul>
<li>Wikipedia: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value">p-value</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes_factor">Bayes factor</a></li>
<li>Ronald A. Fisher (1925), <em>Statistical Methods for Research
Workers</em> — where the 5% threshold appears as an illustrative
example</li>
<li>Harold Jeffreys (1939), <em>Theory of Probability</em> — where the
Bayes-factor thresholds (BF &gt; 3 substantial, BF &gt; 10 strong) come
from</li>
<li><a href="https://jasp-stats.org/">JASP</a> — the open-source
Bayesian statistics software with default priors</li>
</ul>
<h4>Specific
replication-crisis casualties
<ul>
<li>Cuddy, Wilmuth &amp; Carney (2010) original <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_posing">power posing</a>
paper; Carney’s later <a href="https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/dana_carney/pdf_my%20position%20on%20power%20poses.pdf">statement</a>
withdrawing support</li>
<li>Hagger et al. (2016), <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691616652873">A
Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect</a></li>
<li>Bargh, Chen &amp; Burrows (1996) original <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology)#Replication_problems">elderly
priming</a> paper; failed <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029081">Doyen
et al. (2012)</a> replication</li>
<li>Brown, Sokal &amp; Friedman (2013), <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-24609-001">The Complex
Dynamics of Wishful Thinking</a> — demolishing the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_positivity_ratio">3:1
positivity ratio</a></li>
<li>Carol Dweck, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset#Fixed_and_growth_mindsets">growth
mindset</a> — replication concerns documented in Sisk et al. (2018) and
Bahník &amp; Vranka (2017)</li>
<li>Angela Duckworth, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grit_(personality_trait)">grit</a> —
meta-analytic critique in <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-30689-001">Credé, Tynan &amp;
Harms (2017)</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Books cited in the lecture
<ul>
<li>Daniel Kahneman, <em>Thinking, Fast and Slow</em></li>
<li>Stephen J. Gould, <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/946994.Adam_s_navel_and_other_essays"><em>Adam’s
Navel and Other Essays</em></a></li>
<li>Yann Martel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_of_Pi"><em>Life of
Pi</em></a></li>
<li>Bill Mollison, <em>Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual</em></li>
</ul>
<h4>Other
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism/transcript?language=en">Richard
Dawkins on militant atheism</a> (TED) — the “evidence vs. faith”
framing</li>
<li>Reform efforts: <a href="https://www.cos.io/initiatives/prereg">preregistration</a>, <a href="https://osf.io/">open data</a>, multi-lab replication consortia
(e.g. <a href="https://osf.io/wx7ck/">ManyLabs</a>)</li>
</ul></h4></h4></h4></h4></h4></h4></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/43d4f968/569ea3a4.mp3" length="26893056" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/v1UDH-MqzsHGdgMWh8a7p2KaBdCAjCKI-tYXtMkMXKM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jNTBm/MmU2OGEwNTNkMTA4/ZTEzMDg1MTFiYWQ5/NDdlYS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2241</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Science isn't the opposite of belief. It's a ritual—and like any ritual it misfires, which is how a method built to find truth becomes a machine for manufacturing exaggerations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Science isn't the opposite of belief. It's a ritual—and like any ritual it misfires, which is how a method built to find truth becomes a machine for manufacturing exaggerations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/43d4f968/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It’s Not Social Media, Life Is Just Worse</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>It’s Not Social Media, Life Is Just Worse</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:194407942</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fff0ad17</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s worried about social media and mental health. Jonathan
Haidt sold two million copies telling us smartphones rewired our
children’s brains. Thirty-five US states passed phone restriction
legislation off the back of it. But when you look at the research—really
look—the evidence for social media causing mental health problems is
shockingly thin. What isn’t thin is the evidence that life,
structurally, is getting worse in a dozen measurable ways. Maybe we’re
blaming the screen because the alternative is harder to fix.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/life-is-worse">It’s Not Social
Media, Life Is Just Worse</a>—the article that inspired this
lecture</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/amusing-ourselves-to-death">Amusing
Ourselves to Death</a>—on Neil Postman and the information overload
problem</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/why-do-people-kill-themselves">Why
Do People Kill Themselves</a>—on what structural decline does to the
most vulnerable</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer-lecture">Atavism
Isn’t the Answer</a>—the lecture on why “go back to the old ways” rarely
works</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/problem-with-scientific-evidence">The Trap
of Scientific Evidence</a>—on the two forms of “no evidence”</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/situation-symptom-congruence">Why
Being Sad Isn’t Always a Bad Thing</a>—on situation–symptom
congruence</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/loneliness-epidemic">The Loneliness
Epidemic</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/models-of-psychopathology">Models
of Psychopathology</a>—on diagnostic quality and what counts as mental
illness</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-scientific-ritual">The
Scientific Ritual</a>—on the replication crisis and lazy application of
the scientific method</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/true-family-ties">The True Meaning
of Family Ties</a>—on changing family structures and social
fragmentation</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/digital-selves">Creating a Digital
Home</a>—on digital selfhood and why we don’t treat our digital lives
with care</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.orben.group/">Amy Orben’s research group</a>,
University of Cambridge</li>
<li>Ferguson, C. J. et al. (2024). Social media use and youth mental
health: A meta-analysis. <em>Professional Psychology: Research and
Practice.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000589">doi:10.1037/pro0000589</a></li>
<li>Fassi, L., Orben, A. et al. (2024). Social media and adolescent
mental health: A meta-analysis of 143 studies. <em>JAMA Pediatrics.</em>
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2078">doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2078</a></li>
<li>Tolboll, K. B. (2026). Social media use and mental health in
children and adolescents: An umbrella review. <em>Child and Adolescent
Mental Health.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70071">doi:10.1111/camh.70071</a></li>
<li>Fassi, L., Orben, A. et al. (2025). Digital technology use and
adolescent mental health: A registered report. <em>Nature Human
Behaviour.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4">doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4</a></li>
<li>Broadbent, P. et al. (2023). The public health implications of the
cost-of-living crisis. <em>The Lancet Regional Health – Europe.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585">doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585</a></li>
<li>Arundel, R. et al. (2022). Housing unaffordability and mental
health. <em>International Journal of Housing Policy.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2022.2106541">doi:10.1080/19491247.2022.2106541</a></li>
<li>McGorry, P. D. et al. (2025). The youth mental health crisis: A
paradigm shift. <em>Frontiers in Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1517533">doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1517533</a></li>
<li>Kirkbride, J. B. et al. (2024). The social determinants of mental
health and disorder. <em>World Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21160">doi:10.1002/wps.21160</a></li>
<li>Plackett, R. et al. (2022). Digital technology and mental health of
young people: A scoping review. <em>JMIR Mental Health.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.2196/43213">doi:10.2196/43213</a></li>
<li>Garcia-Manglano, J. et al. (2024). Escapism, social media, and
internalising symptoms in adolescents. <em>Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241230248">doi:10.1177/02654075241230248</a></li>
<li>Maheux, A. J. et al. (2024). Social media use and adolescent mental
health: An annual research review. <em>Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14085">doi:10.1111/jcpp.14085</a></li>
<li>Neil Postman, <em>Amusing Ourselves to Death</em> (1985). <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death">Wikipedia</a></li>
<li>Jonathan Haidt, <em>The Anxious Generation</em> (2024). <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anxious_Generation">Wikipedia</a></li>
<li>Stuart Ritchie, <em>Science Fictions</em> (2020). <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/602238/science-fictions-by-stuart-ritchie/">Publisher</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s worried about social media and mental health. Jonathan
Haidt sold two million copies telling us smartphones rewired our
children’s brains. Thirty-five US states passed phone restriction
legislation off the back of it. But when you look at the research—really
look—the evidence for social media causing mental health problems is
shockingly thin. What isn’t thin is the evidence that life,
structurally, is getting worse in a dozen measurable ways. Maybe we’re
blaming the screen because the alternative is harder to fix.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/life-is-worse">It’s Not Social
Media, Life Is Just Worse</a>—the article that inspired this
lecture</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/amusing-ourselves-to-death">Amusing
Ourselves to Death</a>—on Neil Postman and the information overload
problem</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/why-do-people-kill-themselves">Why
Do People Kill Themselves</a>—on what structural decline does to the
most vulnerable</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer-lecture">Atavism
Isn’t the Answer</a>—the lecture on why “go back to the old ways” rarely
works</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/problem-with-scientific-evidence">The Trap
of Scientific Evidence</a>—on the two forms of “no evidence”</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/situation-symptom-congruence">Why
Being Sad Isn’t Always a Bad Thing</a>—on situation–symptom
congruence</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/loneliness-epidemic">The Loneliness
Epidemic</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/models-of-psychopathology">Models
of Psychopathology</a>—on diagnostic quality and what counts as mental
illness</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-scientific-ritual">The
Scientific Ritual</a>—on the replication crisis and lazy application of
the scientific method</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/true-family-ties">The True Meaning
of Family Ties</a>—on changing family structures and social
fragmentation</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/digital-selves">Creating a Digital
Home</a>—on digital selfhood and why we don’t treat our digital lives
with care</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.orben.group/">Amy Orben’s research group</a>,
University of Cambridge</li>
<li>Ferguson, C. J. et al. (2024). Social media use and youth mental
health: A meta-analysis. <em>Professional Psychology: Research and
Practice.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000589">doi:10.1037/pro0000589</a></li>
<li>Fassi, L., Orben, A. et al. (2024). Social media and adolescent
mental health: A meta-analysis of 143 studies. <em>JAMA Pediatrics.</em>
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2078">doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2078</a></li>
<li>Tolboll, K. B. (2026). Social media use and mental health in
children and adolescents: An umbrella review. <em>Child and Adolescent
Mental Health.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70071">doi:10.1111/camh.70071</a></li>
<li>Fassi, L., Orben, A. et al. (2025). Digital technology use and
adolescent mental health: A registered report. <em>Nature Human
Behaviour.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4">doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4</a></li>
<li>Broadbent, P. et al. (2023). The public health implications of the
cost-of-living crisis. <em>The Lancet Regional Health – Europe.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585">doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585</a></li>
<li>Arundel, R. et al. (2022). Housing unaffordability and mental
health. <em>International Journal of Housing Policy.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2022.2106541">doi:10.1080/19491247.2022.2106541</a></li>
<li>McGorry, P. D. et al. (2025). The youth mental health crisis: A
paradigm shift. <em>Frontiers in Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1517533">doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1517533</a></li>
<li>Kirkbride, J. B. et al. (2024). The social determinants of mental
health and disorder. <em>World Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21160">doi:10.1002/wps.21160</a></li>
<li>Plackett, R. et al. (2022). Digital technology and mental health of
young people: A scoping review. <em>JMIR Mental Health.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.2196/43213">doi:10.2196/43213</a></li>
<li>Garcia-Manglano, J. et al. (2024). Escapism, social media, and
internalising symptoms in adolescents. <em>Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241230248">doi:10.1177/02654075241230248</a></li>
<li>Maheux, A. J. et al. (2024). Social media use and adolescent mental
health: An annual research review. <em>Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14085">doi:10.1111/jcpp.14085</a></li>
<li>Neil Postman, <em>Amusing Ourselves to Death</em> (1985). <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death">Wikipedia</a></li>
<li>Jonathan Haidt, <em>The Anxious Generation</em> (2024). <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anxious_Generation">Wikipedia</a></li>
<li>Stuart Ritchie, <em>Science Fictions</em> (2020). <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/602238/science-fictions-by-stuart-ritchie/">Publisher</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 23:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fff0ad17/d8fc24d7.mp3" length="21017449" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/5SDCIRcsobKM6gdB5A-pM6_FeaypNyg7GA8lWl7p4Wk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yYzBj/MWYxNjEyNjM4YzVm/Njg2YzRlM2RhNzkw/OGEzMC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1752</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Social media isn't the disease. It's the symptom you can see. The sad kids on TikTok are there because they're sad, not sad because they're there.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Social media isn't the disease. It's the symptom you can see. The sad kids on TikTok are there because they're sad, not sad because they're there.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fff0ad17/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pop Neuroscience is Just a Fancy Way of Saying ‘Calm Down’</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Pop Neuroscience is Just a Fancy Way of Saying ‘Calm Down’</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:193349060</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b7eb548f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Amygdala hijack, polyvagal theory, the lizard brain, vagus nerve
hacks, brain wave states—these look like different theories explaining
different things about human behaviour. They’re not. They’re all the
same theory: a wildly overengineered version of “just cool the fuck out,
and you’ll be better at stuff.” Why do we keep building these things?
And what do we miss when we do?</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down">The
Betterment article that inspired this one</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre">More
on why the amygdala isn’t what pop-psych says</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">How stress actually
works</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/neuroscience-confidence-trick">Why
we dress up simple ideas in neuroscience jargon</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">The
sociology of the “interesting”</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/abstractions-as-gods">Abstractions
as gods</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/obscuring-banalities">On naming
things and losing them in the process</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/brain-waves">The value of brain
waves</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/abstract-learning-in-the-honeybee">Honey-bees
are smarter than they should be</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer">The false
promise of a return to nature</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/useful-fight-or-flight">Giving in
to fight or flight</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/easy-measurement-bias">The problem
of easy measurement</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/on-emotion">On emotion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/no-action-without-emotion">No
action without emotion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/emotion-and-the-mind">Emotion and
the mind</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/automatic-thinking">Why your
unconscious isn’t the bad guy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/nervous-system-and-behaviour">Nervous
energy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-context">Positive
Intelligence pt. I</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-content-pq">Positive
Intelligence pt. II</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-content-brain-science">Positive
Intelligence pt. III</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/what-is-thinking-phd-1">How does
the brain ‘think’? Pt. I</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyvagal_theory">Polyvagal
theory (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triune_brain#Status_of_the_model">Triune
brain model (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.positiveintelligence.com/neuroscience-white-paper">Positive
Intelligence white paper</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_mode_network">Default
mode network (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema_therapy">Schema
therapy (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_therapy">Gestalt
therapy (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss3/">Journal
of Animal Sentience: do fish feel pain?</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Amygdala hijack, polyvagal theory, the lizard brain, vagus nerve
hacks, brain wave states—these look like different theories explaining
different things about human behaviour. They’re not. They’re all the
same theory: a wildly overengineered version of “just cool the fuck out,
and you’ll be better at stuff.” Why do we keep building these things?
And what do we miss when we do?</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down">The
Betterment article that inspired this one</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre">More
on why the amygdala isn’t what pop-psych says</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">How stress actually
works</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/neuroscience-confidence-trick">Why
we dress up simple ideas in neuroscience jargon</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">The
sociology of the “interesting”</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/abstractions-as-gods">Abstractions
as gods</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/obscuring-banalities">On naming
things and losing them in the process</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/brain-waves">The value of brain
waves</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/abstract-learning-in-the-honeybee">Honey-bees
are smarter than they should be</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer">The false
promise of a return to nature</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/useful-fight-or-flight">Giving in
to fight or flight</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/easy-measurement-bias">The problem
of easy measurement</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/on-emotion">On emotion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/no-action-without-emotion">No
action without emotion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/emotion-and-the-mind">Emotion and
the mind</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/automatic-thinking">Why your
unconscious isn’t the bad guy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/nervous-system-and-behaviour">Nervous
energy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-context">Positive
Intelligence pt. I</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-content-pq">Positive
Intelligence pt. II</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/positive-intelligence-content-brain-science">Positive
Intelligence pt. III</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/what-is-thinking-phd-1">How does
the brain ‘think’? Pt. I</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyvagal_theory">Polyvagal
theory (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triune_brain#Status_of_the_model">Triune
brain model (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.positiveintelligence.com/neuroscience-white-paper">Positive
Intelligence white paper</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_mode_network">Default
mode network (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema_therapy">Schema
therapy (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_therapy">Gestalt
therapy (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss3/">Journal
of Animal Sentience: do fish feel pain?</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b7eb548f/6d160ef5.mp3" length="22033750" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/L1_uWqpvZIU3PsiykZpsYIycLwWALWIFeu32Feg1IQU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS82ZjI0/MDcyMDY1YTU3YzQ2/ZmIyNWQ1NTRkZjhi/MGVkMy5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1836</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pop neuroscience is just "calm down" in a lab coat. The theories are scaffolding around trivial advice, attractive because they make your problems someone else's fault, and the scaffolding hides what actually matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pop neuroscience is just "calm down" in a lab coat. The theories are scaffolding around trivial advice, attractive because they make your problems someone else's fault, and the scaffolding hides what actually matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b7eb548f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bias is Good</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Bias is Good</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:192028319</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/945bc033</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s been told that bias is the enemy of good thinking. Over
200 cognitive biases catalogued on Wikipedia, and the message is clear:
your brain is broken, and if you could just think more rationally, you’d
make better decisions. But when researchers actually tested whether
knowledge of biases helped predict behaviour, the experts did worse than
random laypeople. Maybe the problem isn’t bias. Maybe the problem is
what we think bias is.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/bias-is-good">The Betterment
article that inspired this</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/belief-consistent-information-processing">Confirmation
bias is all there is</a> — fundamental beliefs and belief-consistent
processing</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/bias-vs-bias">Bias vs Bias</a> —
heuristics vs biases, and why the distinction matters</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/yerkes-dodson-bias-vs-noise">Stress
and the Yerkes-Dodson Law</a> — bias vs noise in the stress
response</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good-lecture">Stress is
Good (Lecture 1)</a> — the stress lecture</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre-lecture">The
Amygdala is Not the Fear Centre (Lecture 2)</a> — the amygdala
lecture</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is Ideology</a> — why biases are adaptive</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down">Pop
Neuroscience is Just a Fancy Way of Saying “Calm Down”</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li>Daniel Kahneman, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking%2C_Fast_and_Slow">Thinking,
Fast and Slow</a> (2011)</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases">List of
cognitive biases (Wikipedia)</a> — the 200+ biases</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_theory">Rational-actor
model (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2115126119">Milkman et
al. (2021): Megastudy on behavioural nudges for vaccination</a></li>
<li><a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916221148147">Oeberst
&amp; Imhoff (2023): Toward Parsimony in Bias Research</a> — the
fundamental beliefs paper</li>
<li><a href="https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/archive/econ308/tesfatsion/axeltmts.pdf">Robert
Axelrod’s iterated prisoner’s dilemma tournaments</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias%E2%80%93variance_tradeoff">Bias–variance
tradeoff (Wikipedia)</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s been told that bias is the enemy of good thinking. Over
200 cognitive biases catalogued on Wikipedia, and the message is clear:
your brain is broken, and if you could just think more rationally, you’d
make better decisions. But when researchers actually tested whether
knowledge of biases helped predict behaviour, the experts did worse than
random laypeople. Maybe the problem isn’t bias. Maybe the problem is
what we think bias is.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/bias-is-good">The Betterment
article that inspired this</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/belief-consistent-information-processing">Confirmation
bias is all there is</a> — fundamental beliefs and belief-consistent
processing</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/bias-vs-bias">Bias vs Bias</a> —
heuristics vs biases, and why the distinction matters</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/yerkes-dodson-bias-vs-noise">Stress
and the Yerkes-Dodson Law</a> — bias vs noise in the stress
response</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good-lecture">Stress is
Good (Lecture 1)</a> — the stress lecture</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre-lecture">The
Amygdala is Not the Fear Centre (Lecture 2)</a> — the amygdala
lecture</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is Ideology</a> — why biases are adaptive</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down">Pop
Neuroscience is Just a Fancy Way of Saying “Calm Down”</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li>Daniel Kahneman, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking%2C_Fast_and_Slow">Thinking,
Fast and Slow</a> (2011)</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases">List of
cognitive biases (Wikipedia)</a> — the 200+ biases</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_theory">Rational-actor
model (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2115126119">Milkman et
al. (2021): Megastudy on behavioural nudges for vaccination</a></li>
<li><a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916221148147">Oeberst
&amp; Imhoff (2023): Toward Parsimony in Bias Research</a> — the
fundamental beliefs paper</li>
<li><a href="https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/archive/econ308/tesfatsion/axeltmts.pdf">Robert
Axelrod’s iterated prisoner’s dilemma tournaments</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias%E2%80%93variance_tradeoff">Bias–variance
tradeoff (Wikipedia)</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 20:24:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/945bc033/b15ee224.mp3" length="25189340" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/uHYVHzduY3EHh1eCnCglEdM9j7KGG7Gaxifh9layyiA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lODZi/YWRkZTJlMzk4ZGI5/OTU5NGYyODIxN2Rj/YWU4Yi5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1575</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bias isn't a flaw in your thinking. It's a precision instrument. The brain trades variance for consistency because the world is noisy, so don't fight the bias, find the belief driving it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bias isn't a flaw in your thinking. It's a precision instrument. The brain trades variance for consistency because the world is noisy, so don't fight the bias, find the belief driving it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/945bc033/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Amygdala is Not the Fear Centre</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Amygdala is Not the Fear Centre</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:189020098</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1b8fa983</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s been told the amygdala is the fear centre of the brain.
That it hijacks your rational mind and throws you into fight-or-flight
at the sound of an email notification. This is nonsense—the kind of
nonsense that makes every McKinsey consultant sound like a
neuroscientist and every neuroscientist cringe. The amygdala is an
emotional intensity detector, not an emotional dictator. And focusing on
it is distracting you from what actually matters: how you respond to the
world.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre">The
Betterment article that inspired this</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good-lecture">Stress is
Good (Lecture 1)</a> — the stress lecture that set this up</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">More on stress and
the Yerkes-Dodson Law</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/useful-fight-or-flight">Why
fight-or-flight isn’t what you think</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down">Pop
Neuroscience is Just a Fancy Way of Saying “Calm Down”</a> — the next
lecture in this thread</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/making-meaning-in-the-brain">How we
make meaning in the brain</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/12/change-feelings-circumstances/620876/">The
Atlantic article</a> — the management professor’s piece on stress and
the amygdala</li>
<li>Daniel Goleman, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_Intelligence">Emotional
Intelligence</a> (1995)</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdala_hijack">Amygdala
hijack (Wikipedia)</a> — note the lack of academic citations</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdala">Amygdala
(Wikipedia)</a> — particularly the section on emotional learning</li>
<li><a href="http://sites.oxy.edu/clint/physio/article/emotionandcognition.pdf">Pessoa
(2010): Emotion and cognition</a> (PDF) — reappraisal evidence, pg
44</li>
<li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342048/">Janak &amp;
Tye (2015): From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala</a> — the
complexity of amygdala function</li>
<li><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00178/full">Adolphs
(2015): “The unsolved problems of neuroscience”</a> — on the amygdala
and emotional significance</li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s been told the amygdala is the fear centre of the brain.
That it hijacks your rational mind and throws you into fight-or-flight
at the sound of an email notification. This is nonsense—the kind of
nonsense that makes every McKinsey consultant sound like a
neuroscientist and every neuroscientist cringe. The amygdala is an
emotional intensity detector, not an emotional dictator. And focusing on
it is distracting you from what actually matters: how you respond to the
world.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre">The
Betterment article that inspired this</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good-lecture">Stress is
Good (Lecture 1)</a> — the stress lecture that set this up</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">More on stress and
the Yerkes-Dodson Law</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/useful-fight-or-flight">Why
fight-or-flight isn’t what you think</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/overengineering-calming-down">Pop
Neuroscience is Just a Fancy Way of Saying “Calm Down”</a> — the next
lecture in this thread</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/making-meaning-in-the-brain">How we
make meaning in the brain</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/12/change-feelings-circumstances/620876/">The
Atlantic article</a> — the management professor’s piece on stress and
the amygdala</li>
<li>Daniel Goleman, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_Intelligence">Emotional
Intelligence</a> (1995)</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdala_hijack">Amygdala
hijack (Wikipedia)</a> — note the lack of academic citations</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdala">Amygdala
(Wikipedia)</a> — particularly the section on emotional learning</li>
<li><a href="http://sites.oxy.edu/clint/physio/article/emotionandcognition.pdf">Pessoa
(2010): Emotion and cognition</a> (PDF) — reappraisal evidence, pg
44</li>
<li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342048/">Janak &amp;
Tye (2015): From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala</a> — the
complexity of amygdala function</li>
<li><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00178/full">Adolphs
(2015): “The unsolved problems of neuroscience”</a> — on the amygdala
and emotional significance</li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:06:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1b8fa983/d9e7e50b.mp3" length="17009484" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/XaWbrUsqANyAks4rhR_oUhkYk3zwCKNKYQVVwaGPXFA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mZjhh/NDk4M2ZmOGU0ZmY3/MzBlNTE2NmNlNDcz/OTc2Ni5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1063</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Your amygdala doesn't decide your fear. You do. It's not a fear centre, it's an intensity detector, and calming it down is solving the wrong problem. Watch how you respond instead.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Your amygdala doesn't decide your fear. You do. It's not a fear centre, it's an intensity detector, and calming it down is solving the wrong problem. Watch how you respond instead.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1b8fa983/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hydraulic Despotism</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Hydraulic Despotism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:188848219</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b9bff0f6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Karl Wittfogel’s theory of hydraulic despotism was savaged by his
peers and rightly so. But the pattern he was reaching for—that whoever
controls the essential flowing resource controls the people—is the story
of modern infrastructure. Energy, social media, payment systems, AI
compute. We handed over the water. We don’t have to hand over everything
else.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/hydraulic-despotism">The Betterment
article that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/from-zero">From Zero: on recreating
systems from scratch</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/digital-selves">Digital Selves: taking
control of your digital presence</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/true-family-ties">True Family Ties: on the
erosion of our communities</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">Education is
Entertainment: on why some ideas stick</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_August_Wittfogel">Karl
Wittfogel</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_empire">Hydraulic
civilisations</a> on Wikipedia - Wittfogel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriental_Despotism"><em>Oriental
Despotism</em></a> (1957) - <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgleg70r7rno">Thames Water’s
debt crisis</a> (BBC) - <a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/how-the-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-has-further-aggravated-the-global-food-crisis/">Russia-Ukraine
food insecurity</a> (European Council) - <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8e970vn5vo">Nvidia
valuation</a> (BBC) - Mann’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructural_power">Infrastructural
Power</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-49147-4_6">Platform
Capitalism</a> and <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/29768624251323325">its
dynamics</a> - Callon’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obligatory_passage_point">Obligatory
Passage Points</a> and Latour’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor%E2%80%93network_theory">Actor-Network
Theory</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_facilities_doctrine">Essential
Facilities Doctrine</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act">EU Digital
Markets Act</a> on Wikipedia - Cory Doctorow, <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition">“The
Post-American Internet” (39C3 talk)</a> — on the new coalition,
anticircumvention law, and Eurostack - Cory Doctorow on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification">enshittification</a>
and <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/10/adversarial-interoperability">adversarial
interoperability</a> - Elinor Ostrom, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governing_the_Commons"><em>Governing
the Commons</em></a> (1990) - Selye’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustress">Eustress</a> — the
distinction between good stress and bad stress</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Karl Wittfogel’s theory of hydraulic despotism was savaged by his
peers and rightly so. But the pattern he was reaching for—that whoever
controls the essential flowing resource controls the people—is the story
of modern infrastructure. Energy, social media, payment systems, AI
compute. We handed over the water. We don’t have to hand over everything
else.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/hydraulic-despotism">The Betterment
article that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/from-zero">From Zero: on recreating
systems from scratch</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/digital-selves">Digital Selves: taking
control of your digital presence</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/true-family-ties">True Family Ties: on the
erosion of our communities</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">Education is
Entertainment: on why some ideas stick</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_August_Wittfogel">Karl
Wittfogel</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_empire">Hydraulic
civilisations</a> on Wikipedia - Wittfogel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriental_Despotism"><em>Oriental
Despotism</em></a> (1957) - <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgleg70r7rno">Thames Water’s
debt crisis</a> (BBC) - <a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/how-the-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-has-further-aggravated-the-global-food-crisis/">Russia-Ukraine
food insecurity</a> (European Council) - <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8e970vn5vo">Nvidia
valuation</a> (BBC) - Mann’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructural_power">Infrastructural
Power</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-49147-4_6">Platform
Capitalism</a> and <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/29768624251323325">its
dynamics</a> - Callon’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obligatory_passage_point">Obligatory
Passage Points</a> and Latour’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor%E2%80%93network_theory">Actor-Network
Theory</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_facilities_doctrine">Essential
Facilities Doctrine</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act">EU Digital
Markets Act</a> on Wikipedia - Cory Doctorow, <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition">“The
Post-American Internet” (39C3 talk)</a> — on the new coalition,
anticircumvention law, and Eurostack - Cory Doctorow on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification">enshittification</a>
and <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/10/adversarial-interoperability">adversarial
interoperability</a> - Elinor Ostrom, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governing_the_Commons"><em>Governing
the Commons</em></a> (1990) - Selye’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustress">Eustress</a> — the
distinction between good stress and bad stress</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:04:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b9bff0f6/ac51c119.mp3" length="16772902" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/gTusfDesduicp0dqETkhAbNw1qZXf6ETF73I7fLEbGY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8zNzQ1/Yzg0NGI1YjA1MDRm/MmE4NThhYTVhNWFj/NDg1ZS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1049</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>You're not coerced by malice. You're coerced by convenience. Control the flow, control the people: the most discredited theory in political science describes social media, energy and compute perfectly. The alternatives exist. We just don't use them.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>You're not coerced by malice. You're coerced by convenience. Control the flow, control the people: the most discredited theory in political science describes social media, energy and compute perfectly. The alternatives exist. We just don't use them.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b9bff0f6/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Atavism Isn’t the Answer</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Atavism Isn’t the Answer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:188827933</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ee9fa0b4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Seed oils, raw milk, carnivore diets, tradwives, phone bans,
anti-sunscreen, cold plunges—these look like separate cultural phenomena
across health, diet, gender, and technology. They’re all the same
pattern: the same two faulty assumptions, the same Just So Story
template, the same political movement. The yearnings are real. The
reasoning isn’t.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer">The Betterment
article that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/evolution-is-overrated">Evolution is
Overrated</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/all-food-is-toxic">All
Food is Toxic</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/hydraulic-despotism">Hydraulic
Despotism</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/nature-vs-nurture-just-isnt-that-interesting">Nature
vs Nurture Just Isn’t That Interesting</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/tinbergen-four-questions-evolution">Tinbergen’s
Four Questions</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">Education is
Entertainment: on why some ideas stick</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/mundane-cults">Mundane Cults</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_America_Healthy_Again">MAHA
(Make America Healthy Again)</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.">Robert F.
Kennedy Jr.</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2831265">Butter
and Plant-Based Oils Intake and Mortality</a>, JAMA Internal Medicine
(2025) - <a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/the-evidence-behind-seed-oils-health-effects">The
Evidence Behind Seed Oils’ Health Effects</a>, Johns Hopkins (2025) -
Paul Saladino, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Carnivore_Code"><em>The
Carnivore Code</em></a> - Jonathan Haidt, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anxious_Generation"><em>The
Anxious Generation</em></a> - Candice Odgers, <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00902-2"><em>Nature</em>
review on smartphones and mental health</a> - Ferguson (2025): <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380304294_Do_social_media_experiments_prove_a_link_with_mental_health_A_methodological_and_meta-analytic_review">Do
Social Media Experiments Prove a Link With Mental Health: A
Methodological and Meta-Analytic Review</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liver_King">Liver King</a> on
Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Huberman">Andrew Huberman</a>
on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballerina_Farm">Ballerina Farm /
Hannah Neeleman</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradwife">Tradwife</a> on Wikipedia
- <a href="https://www.kcl.ac.uk/giwl/assets/giwl-tradwife-report.pdf">Tradwife:
Between Myths and Realities</a>, King’s College London Global Institute
for Women’s Leadership - <a href="https://www.citizen.org/article/maha-means-money/">MAHA, Means,
Money</a>, Public Citizen report on MAHA and wellness industry
revenue</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Seed oils, raw milk, carnivore diets, tradwives, phone bans,
anti-sunscreen, cold plunges—these look like separate cultural phenomena
across health, diet, gender, and technology. They’re all the same
pattern: the same two faulty assumptions, the same Just So Story
template, the same political movement. The yearnings are real. The
reasoning isn’t.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer">The Betterment
article that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/evolution-is-overrated">Evolution is
Overrated</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/all-food-is-toxic">All
Food is Toxic</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/hydraulic-despotism">Hydraulic
Despotism</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/nature-vs-nurture-just-isnt-that-interesting">Nature
vs Nurture Just Isn’t That Interesting</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/tinbergen-four-questions-evolution">Tinbergen’s
Four Questions</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">Education is
Entertainment: on why some ideas stick</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/mundane-cults">Mundane Cults</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_America_Healthy_Again">MAHA
(Make America Healthy Again)</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.">Robert F.
Kennedy Jr.</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2831265">Butter
and Plant-Based Oils Intake and Mortality</a>, JAMA Internal Medicine
(2025) - <a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/the-evidence-behind-seed-oils-health-effects">The
Evidence Behind Seed Oils’ Health Effects</a>, Johns Hopkins (2025) -
Paul Saladino, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Carnivore_Code"><em>The
Carnivore Code</em></a> - Jonathan Haidt, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anxious_Generation"><em>The
Anxious Generation</em></a> - Candice Odgers, <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00902-2"><em>Nature</em>
review on smartphones and mental health</a> - Ferguson (2025): <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380304294_Do_social_media_experiments_prove_a_link_with_mental_health_A_methodological_and_meta-analytic_review">Do
Social Media Experiments Prove a Link With Mental Health: A
Methodological and Meta-Analytic Review</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liver_King">Liver King</a> on
Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Huberman">Andrew Huberman</a>
on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballerina_Farm">Ballerina Farm /
Hannah Neeleman</a> on Wikipedia - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradwife">Tradwife</a> on Wikipedia
- <a href="https://www.kcl.ac.uk/giwl/assets/giwl-tradwife-report.pdf">Tradwife:
Between Myths and Realities</a>, King’s College London Global Institute
for Women’s Leadership - <a href="https://www.citizen.org/article/maha-means-money/">MAHA, Means,
Money</a>, Public Citizen report on MAHA and wellness industry
revenue</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 20:45:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ee9fa0b4/81c96a06.mp3" length="26696956" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/b6ExkZg73bjuzzW_-EXszotWRZPHWUiuPkzO6ApZe1w/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81MWVm/ZjYwYzQ1YzhlYWU1/YjBlMWZhNjYxYjQ2/Yjg1Yi5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1669</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Seed oils, raw milk, cold plunges, tradwives—one template runs them all: name a modern ill, invent an ancestral past, sell the return as cure. It's built on a fantasy we can't verify.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Seed oils, raw milk, cold plunges, tradwives—one template runs them all: name a modern ill, invent an ancestral past, sell the return as cure. It's built on a fantasy we can't verify.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ee9fa0b4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Values Don’t Matter</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Values Don’t Matter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:185640283</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ddb6a6d4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone loves organisational values. Corporates, militaries, sports
clubs, schools—any place where people collect in a serious way has a
list of qualities they want everyone to embody. But values are just
virtue ethics by another name. And virtue ethics suffer two rather
troubling problems: virtues are hugely context-dependent, and the
situation overwhelmingly drives behaviour anyway. So if you want people
to act virtuously, design the context.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/values-dont-matter">The Betterment article
that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/moral-terrain">Overview of the ethical
landscape</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/catastrophic-leadership-is-hard">On
catastrophic leadership failure</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/choice-architecture">Everything is choice
architecture</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/making-strong-group-dynamics">Making
strong group dynamics</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/on-motivation">On motivation</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/belief-consistent-information-processing">Belief-consistent
information processing</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - MacIntyre’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Virtue"><em>After
Virtue</em></a> - <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10892-009-9054-2">Situationist
critique of virtue ethics</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person%E2%80%93situation_debate">Person-situation
debate</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment">Milgram’s
obedience experiments</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment">Stanford
Prison Experiment</a> - John Doris on the <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-psych-emp/">ecological
approach to ethics</a> - Maria Merritt on <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009926720584">“humility
ethics”</a> - <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840606062427">Moore
and Beadle</a> on organisations as MacIntyrean practices</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone loves organisational values. Corporates, militaries, sports
clubs, schools—any place where people collect in a serious way has a
list of qualities they want everyone to embody. But values are just
virtue ethics by another name. And virtue ethics suffer two rather
troubling problems: virtues are hugely context-dependent, and the
situation overwhelmingly drives behaviour anyway. So if you want people
to act virtuously, design the context.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/values-dont-matter">The Betterment article
that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/moral-terrain">Overview of the ethical
landscape</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/catastrophic-leadership-is-hard">On
catastrophic leadership failure</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/choice-architecture">Everything is choice
architecture</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/making-strong-group-dynamics">Making
strong group dynamics</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/on-motivation">On motivation</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/belief-consistent-information-processing">Belief-consistent
information processing</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - MacIntyre’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Virtue"><em>After
Virtue</em></a> - <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10892-009-9054-2">Situationist
critique of virtue ethics</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person%E2%80%93situation_debate">Person-situation
debate</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment">Milgram’s
obedience experiments</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment">Stanford
Prison Experiment</a> - John Doris on the <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-psych-emp/">ecological
approach to ethics</a> - Maria Merritt on <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009926720584">“humility
ethics”</a> - <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840606062427">Moore
and Beadle</a> on organisations as MacIntyrean practices</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:19:05 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ddb6a6d4/3697d4dd.mp3" length="29084328" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_1zvBHCK5wy9hjzDuGJ7miJ_2bhm-voDtUP7dwJnE7Y/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS82YmU5/YzQ3Y2M2OGNiMDUw/YTczNTUzYTc1ZjNl/YzQ3Yi5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1818</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Values don't shape behaviour. The room does. They're virtue ethics relabelled—and courage for a soldier isn't courage for a teacher. Build the context; drop the list.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Values don't shape behaviour. The room does. They're virtue ethics relabelled—and courage for a soldier isn't courage for a teacher. Build the context; drop the list.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ddb6a6d4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hard Problem of Consciousness Isn’t a Problem</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Hard Problem of Consciousness Isn’t a Problem</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:183921983</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/dca0b5ca</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What is consciousness? From Mary’s Room to philosophical zombies,
from panpsychism to eliminativism, everyone has theories about the “hard
problem.” But under what realistic circumstances would it actually
matter whether something is truly conscious versus merely appearing
conscious?</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/panpsychism">Panpsychism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/ai-consciousness">AI
Consciousness</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/consciousness-vs-conscious-access">Consciousness
vs Conscious Access</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/mundane-cults">Mundane
Cults</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">The Placebo
Effect</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/spirituality-of-the-mind">Spirituality of
the Mind</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary%E2%80%93secondary_quality_distinction">John
Locke: Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_argument">Mary’s
Room (Knowledge Argument)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia">Qualia on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf">Thomas
Nagel: “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_echolocation">Animal
Echolocation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness">Hard
Problem of Consciousness</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie">Philosophical
Zombie</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moral_Landscape">Sam
Harris: The Moral Landscape</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_science_can_answer_moral_questions">Sam
Harris TED Talk: Science Can Answer Moral Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_mysterianism">New
Mysterianism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss3/1/">Brian
Key: Fish Cannot Feel Pain</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&amp;context=animsent">Do
Honey Bees Have Conscious Experience?</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What is consciousness? From Mary’s Room to philosophical zombies,
from panpsychism to eliminativism, everyone has theories about the “hard
problem.” But under what realistic circumstances would it actually
matter whether something is truly conscious versus merely appearing
conscious?</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/panpsychism">Panpsychism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/ai-consciousness">AI
Consciousness</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/consciousness-vs-conscious-access">Consciousness
vs Conscious Access</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/mundane-cults">Mundane
Cults</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">The Placebo
Effect</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/spirituality-of-the-mind">Spirituality of
the Mind</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary%E2%80%93secondary_quality_distinction">John
Locke: Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_argument">Mary’s
Room (Knowledge Argument)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia">Qualia on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf">Thomas
Nagel: “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_echolocation">Animal
Echolocation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness">Hard
Problem of Consciousness</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie">Philosophical
Zombie</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moral_Landscape">Sam
Harris: The Moral Landscape</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_science_can_answer_moral_questions">Sam
Harris TED Talk: Science Can Answer Moral Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_mysterianism">New
Mysterianism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss3/1/">Brian
Key: Fish Cannot Feel Pain</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&amp;context=animsent">Do
Honey Bees Have Conscious Experience?</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:05:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/dca0b5ca/029b0de3.mp3" length="14498031" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/88R6kAOI9c_MZF4xkupR8KWpJkU70PgPhkByo5q5G70/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8zNDdj/NmE3ZGI0MjE1NWYy/NTI0NjRkOTBkZmVj/ZmU0Ni5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>907</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The hard problem of consciousness isn't a problem. It's a beautiful argument with no stakes. Behaviour is what matters, not the ghost behind the curtain.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The hard problem of consciousness isn't a problem. It's a beautiful argument with no stakes. Behaviour is what matters, not the ghost behind the curtain.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/dca0b5ca/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Cares if There’s No Such Thing as Free Will?</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Who Cares if There’s No Such Thing as Free Will?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:183891956</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/82a9540a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>From Libet’s experiments to modern neuroscience, evidence keeps
mounting that our decisions might be predetermined. But even if free
will is an illusion, what would actually change? Behaviour is still
something we can modify, determinism doesn’t excuse us from consequence,
and the debate itself is practically irrelevant.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/on-motivation">On Motivation:
Thinky vs Non-Thinky</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/dual-process-theories">Dual-Process
Theories</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/brain-waves">Brain Waves</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/spirituality-of-the-mind">Spirituality of
the Mind</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/environment-is-everything">The
Environment is Everything</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism">Determinism on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism">Fatalism on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism#Theological">Theological
Determinism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Libet#Volitional_acts_and_readiness_potential">Benjamin
Libet’s Experiments</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will">Neuroscience
of Free Will</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_causation">Agent
Causation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibilism">Compatibilism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroethics#Neuroscience_and_free_will">Neuroethics
and Free Will</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism#Idle_argument">Fatalism:
The Idle Argument</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>From Libet’s experiments to modern neuroscience, evidence keeps
mounting that our decisions might be predetermined. But even if free
will is an illusion, what would actually change? Behaviour is still
something we can modify, determinism doesn’t excuse us from consequence,
and the debate itself is practically irrelevant.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/on-motivation">On Motivation:
Thinky vs Non-Thinky</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/dual-process-theories">Dual-Process
Theories</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/brain-waves">Brain Waves</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/spirituality-of-the-mind">Spirituality of
the Mind</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/environment-is-everything">The
Environment is Everything</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism">Determinism on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism">Fatalism on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism#Theological">Theological
Determinism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Libet#Volitional_acts_and_readiness_potential">Benjamin
Libet’s Experiments</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will">Neuroscience
of Free Will</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_causation">Agent
Causation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibilism">Compatibilism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroethics#Neuroscience_and_free_will">Neuroethics
and Free Will</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism#Idle_argument">Fatalism:
The Idle Argument</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 23:09:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/82a9540a/dde939d6.mp3" length="12137395" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/s60tmkLv_mKL6Ee2W1_btc_Oj1jCDphZO4bSD9vNlW4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS85NWRi/YTAxZDYzNTI0NTIz/ZTkzZGQ0MTgwYTc5/MjZhZC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>759</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Whether free will is real changes precisely nothing. The world's too complex for the answer to bite, and behaviour bends the same way no matter which side wins.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Whether free will is real changes precisely nothing. The world's too complex for the answer to bite, and behaviour bends the same way no matter which side wins.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/82a9540a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nature vs Nurture isn't Interesting</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Nature vs Nurture isn't Interesting</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:182345821</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c7fd115f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The nature versus nurture debate seems foundational to understanding
human behaviour. But evolutionary stories are just stories, genetics is
shaped by environment, and the environment matters far more anyway. So
why are we still arguing about it?</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/genetics-is-nurture">Genetics is
Nurture</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/evolution-is-overrated">Evolution
is Overrated</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer">Atavism
Isn’t the Answer</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">Stress is
Good</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/prehistoric-polygamy">Prehistoric
Polygamy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sexual-strategies-evolution">Sexual
Strategies and Evolution</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/tinbergen-four-questions-evolution">Tinbergen’s
Four Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/environment-is-everything">The
Environment is Everything</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/all-food-is-toxic">All Food is
Toxic</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">Education is
Entertainment</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability">Heritability on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://elifesciences.org/articles/20320">Height
heritability study</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism#Idle_argument">Fatalism:
The Idle Argument</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The nature versus nurture debate seems foundational to understanding
human behaviour. But evolutionary stories are just stories, genetics is
shaped by environment, and the environment matters far more anyway. So
why are we still arguing about it?</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/genetics-is-nurture">Genetics is
Nurture</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/evolution-is-overrated">Evolution
is Overrated</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/atavism-isnt-the-answer">Atavism
Isn’t the Answer</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">Stress is
Good</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/prehistoric-polygamy">Prehistoric
Polygamy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/sexual-strategies-evolution">Sexual
Strategies and Evolution</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/tinbergen-four-questions-evolution">Tinbergen’s
Four Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/environment-is-everything">The
Environment is Everything</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/all-food-is-toxic">All Food is
Toxic</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/education-is-entertainment">Education is
Entertainment</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability">Heritability on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://elifesciences.org/articles/20320">Height
heritability study</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalism#Idle_argument">Fatalism:
The Idle Argument</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 23:59:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c7fd115f/87d84ca7.mp3" length="12182890" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/JMPPS3fcRePGaXToXJqpV0IGp_3W-CViX4zCbjUGo6w/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9kNzFi/NjBhYTY4YTEyZGVl/MWUxY2YyYzUzNjcw/M2E1My5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>762</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nature is just nurture given time, and nurture is obviously the one in charge. The whole debate is Gladwell bait: superficially sexy, practically useless.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nature is just nurture given time, and nurture is obviously the one in charge. The whole debate is Gladwell bait: superficially sexy, practically useless.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c7fd115f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mundane Cults</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Mundane Cults</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:182343971</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f54c2938</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The word cult conjures images of hooded figures, mass suicide, and
narcissistic leaders. But this dark image is nonsense—the kind that
makes us more vulnerable to destructive groups. Cults are actually a
pervasive building block of modern community, from veganism to fitness
franchises to health movements. The question isn’t whether you’re in
one, but whether it’s one you chose.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/successful-prophets">Successful
Prophets</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/value-of-ritual">The Value of
Ritual</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/human-perspective-is-not-the-only-one">Human
Perspective is Not the Only One</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is Ideology</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-scientific-ritual">The
Scientific Ritual</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/panpsychism">Panpsychism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/questions-that-dont-matter">Questions That
Don’t Matter</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/all-food-is-toxic">All Food is
Toxic</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/easy-measurement-bias">Easy
Measurement Bias</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">The Placebo
Effect</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/charismatic-leader-weber">The
Charismatic Leader (Weber)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/true-family-ties">True Family
Ties</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/abstractions-as-gods">Abstractions
as Gods</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/belief-consistent-information-processing">Belief-Consistent
Information Processing</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3511972">Sociological
classification of cults</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Wallis">Roy Wallis on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reformation">The Protestant
Reformation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jay_Lifton">Robert Jay
Lifton on Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jay_Lifton#Theories_of_totalism_and_the_protean_self">Robert
Jay Lifton: Theories of Totalism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Singer">Margaret
Singer on Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janja_Lalich">Janja Lalich on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combating_Cult_Mind_Control">Steven
Hassan: Combating Cult Mind Control</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War">Korean
War</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwashing#China_and_the_Korean_War">Brainwashing:
China and the Korean War</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown">Jonestown</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_%28religious_group%29">Heaven’s
Gate</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manson_Family">Manson
Family</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_behaviour">Religious
Behaviour on Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-11-17-vw-257-story.html">LA
Times: Cults as Places of Value</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1386560">JSTOR: Affiliation
and Spiritual Fulfillment</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14755610.2011.557015">Church
vs Sect (Troeltsch and Niebuhr)</a></li>
</ul>
</h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The word cult conjures images of hooded figures, mass suicide, and
narcissistic leaders. But this dark image is nonsense—the kind that
makes us more vulnerable to destructive groups. Cults are actually a
pervasive building block of modern community, from veganism to fitness
franchises to health movements. The question isn’t whether you’re in
one, but whether it’s one you chose.</p>
<h3>Further reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/successful-prophets">Successful
Prophets</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/value-of-ritual">The Value of
Ritual</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/human-perspective-is-not-the-only-one">Human
Perspective is Not the Only One</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/everything-is-ideology">Everything
is Ideology</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-scientific-ritual">The
Scientific Ritual</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/panpsychism">Panpsychism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/questions-that-dont-matter">Questions That
Don’t Matter</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/all-food-is-toxic">All Food is
Toxic</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/easy-measurement-bias">Easy
Measurement Bias</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/placebo-effect">The Placebo
Effect</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/charismatic-leader-weber">The
Charismatic Leader (Weber)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/true-family-ties">True Family
Ties</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/abstractions-as-gods">Abstractions
as Gods</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/belief-consistent-information-processing">Belief-Consistent
Information Processing</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3511972">Sociological
classification of cults</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Wallis">Roy Wallis on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reformation">The Protestant
Reformation</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jay_Lifton">Robert Jay
Lifton on Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jay_Lifton#Theories_of_totalism_and_the_protean_self">Robert
Jay Lifton: Theories of Totalism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Singer">Margaret
Singer on Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janja_Lalich">Janja Lalich on
Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combating_Cult_Mind_Control">Steven
Hassan: Combating Cult Mind Control</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War">Korean
War</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwashing#China_and_the_Korean_War">Brainwashing:
China and the Korean War</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown">Jonestown</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_%28religious_group%29">Heaven’s
Gate</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manson_Family">Manson
Family</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_behaviour">Religious
Behaviour on Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-11-17-vw-257-story.html">LA
Times: Cults as Places of Value</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1386560">JSTOR: Affiliation
and Spiritual Fulfillment</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14755610.2011.557015">Church
vs Sect (Troeltsch and Niebuhr)</a></li>
</ul>
</h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 23:01:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f54c2938/69a624f6.mp3" length="23230783" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Rgj6s1bFDxiju6YJkMyjKIyCa3_2ol63YjCeggeFGzQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9iMDUx/MGI1ZjY2MjcxYjVh/YWZlMzZjODhkMWVj/MGViNi5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1452</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Cults aren't the fringe. They're the architecture of ordinary community, and not being in one usually means something's gone wrong. The question is whether yours is one you chose.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cults aren't the fringe. They're the architecture of ordinary community, and not being in one usually means something's gone wrong. The question is whether yours is one you chose.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f54c2938/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Men aren't from Mars</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Men aren't from Mars</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:179612971</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c3be7624</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Gender essentialism is having a moment. Everyone’s reading books
about what it means to be a man or woman, and <em>Men are from Mars,
Women are from Venus</em> keeps getting recommended to me like it’s
gospel. Here’s the thing: the book perfectly illustrates a pattern we
see everywhere. The same behaviours—complaining, offering advice,
needing reassurance, getting defensive—are cast as reasonable when men
do them and unreasonable when women do them. Gray’s men are emotionally
fragile and his women just want basic partnership, but somehow it’s the
women who need to lower their expectations. This isn’t about men and
women. It’s about how we frame identical behaviours differently based on
who’s doing them.</p>
<h3>Further Reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus-1">Men
and women are from earth, fool pt. I</a> - On Gray’s credentials and
Chapter 2’s absurdities</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus-2">Men
and women are from earth, fool pt. II</a> - On how Gray’s “Martians” are
actually just poorly attached people</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus-3">Men
and women are from earth, fool pt. III</a> - On how women’s ordinary
needs are cast as unreasonable</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.vogue.co.uk/article/is-having-a-boyfriend-embarrassing-now">Is
Having a Boyfriend Embarrassing Now? - British Vogue</a> - Chanté
Joseph’s viral article on modern dating</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Are_from_Mars,_Women_Are_from_Venus">Men
Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gray_%28American_author%29">John
Gray (author) - Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_%28Junger_book%29">Tribe: On
Homecoming and Belonging - Sebastian Junger</a> - On why young men join
the military</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_essentialism">Gender
essentialism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism#Humans">Sexual
dimorphism in humans</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03782-6">Nature
article on sex differences in the brain</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Mars_and_Venus">The Myth
of Mars and Venus (book)</a> - Academic critique of Gray’s work</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Pacific_University#Site_visits_and_CPU's_response:_1994%E2%80%931995">Columbia
Pacific University</a> - Gray’s fraudulent PhD</li>
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/john-grays-mars-venus-llc-564498-02052019">FDA
Warning Letter to John Gray’s Mars Venus LLC</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.kornferry.com/about-us/press/new-research-shows-women-are-better-at-using-soft-skills-crucial-for-effective-leadership">Women
are better at using soft skills crucial for leadership - Korn
Ferry</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/rejection-sensitivity">Rejection
sensitivity</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/attachment-theory-styles">Attachment
theory and styles</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Gender essentialism is having a moment. Everyone’s reading books
about what it means to be a man or woman, and <em>Men are from Mars,
Women are from Venus</em> keeps getting recommended to me like it’s
gospel. Here’s the thing: the book perfectly illustrates a pattern we
see everywhere. The same behaviours—complaining, offering advice,
needing reassurance, getting defensive—are cast as reasonable when men
do them and unreasonable when women do them. Gray’s men are emotionally
fragile and his women just want basic partnership, but somehow it’s the
women who need to lower their expectations. This isn’t about men and
women. It’s about how we frame identical behaviours differently based on
who’s doing them.</p>
<h3>Further Reading
<ul>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus-1">Men
and women are from earth, fool pt. I</a> - On Gray’s credentials and
Chapter 2’s absurdities</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus-2">Men
and women are from earth, fool pt. II</a> - On how Gray’s “Martians” are
actually just poorly attached people</li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus-3">Men
and women are from earth, fool pt. III</a> - On how women’s ordinary
needs are cast as unreasonable</li>
</ul>
<h3>References
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.vogue.co.uk/article/is-having-a-boyfriend-embarrassing-now">Is
Having a Boyfriend Embarrassing Now? - British Vogue</a> - Chanté
Joseph’s viral article on modern dating</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Are_from_Mars,_Women_Are_from_Venus">Men
Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gray_%28American_author%29">John
Gray (author) - Wikipedia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_%28Junger_book%29">Tribe: On
Homecoming and Belonging - Sebastian Junger</a> - On why young men join
the military</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_essentialism">Gender
essentialism</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism#Humans">Sexual
dimorphism in humans</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03782-6">Nature
article on sex differences in the brain</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Mars_and_Venus">The Myth
of Mars and Venus (book)</a> - Academic critique of Gray’s work</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Pacific_University#Site_visits_and_CPU's_response:_1994%E2%80%931995">Columbia
Pacific University</a> - Gray’s fraudulent PhD</li>
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/john-grays-mars-venus-llc-564498-02052019">FDA
Warning Letter to John Gray’s Mars Venus LLC</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.kornferry.com/about-us/press/new-research-shows-women-are-better-at-using-soft-skills-crucial-for-effective-leadership">Women
are better at using soft skills crucial for leadership - Korn
Ferry</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/rejection-sensitivity">Rejection
sensitivity</a></li>
<li><a href="https://btr.mt/analects/attachment-theory-styles">Attachment
theory and styles</a></li>
</ul></h3></h3>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:01:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c3be7624/0d1b517a.mp3" length="33331610" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/FKc0FdfmZJeRaWlB1SqS_APpqX8tG2taRcx5IXcrE1A/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9kMWY3/MmI1Yzc0OGQ4NDY4/MzllMTE5M2RkYTI1/YTY4Ny5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2084</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Men and women aren't wired differently. We read the same behaviour as reasonable in him and unreasonable in her—normalising troubled men while pathologising women's ordinary needs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Men and women aren't wired differently. We read the same behaviour as reasonable in him and unreasonable in her—normalising troubled men while pathologising women's ordinary needs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c3be7624/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stress is Good</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Stress is Good</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:178654076</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0c97697f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s convinced stress is this outdated evolutionary
technology—poorly calibrated to modern life, something to avoid at all
costs. The story goes that it evolved to help us run from tigers, but
now it’s just triggered by email notifications. This is nonsense. Stress
is the only thing that gets us to perform at all. It’s the most valuable
biological technology we have. This lecture walks through the
Yerkes-Dodson Law—a simple, 100-year-old model that explains how stress
actually works, why we need it, and how to use it well.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">The Betterment article
that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/yerkes-dodson-bias-vs-noise">More on
stress and cognitive flexibility</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre">Why
the amygdala doesn’t work the way you think</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/12/change-feelings-circumstances/620876/">The
Atlantic Article, demonstrating the typical approach to stress</a> -
Sapolsky’s book <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Zebras_Don't_Get_Ulcers">Why
Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/yerkes-dodson-bias-vs-noise">Yerkes Dodson
Law</a> - <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585969/full">Vartinian
et al. (2020)</a>, <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27576026/">Goldfarb et
al. (2017)</a>, <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469305/">Lenow et
al. (2017)</a> or <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647765/">this
commentary</a> on the relationship between low stress and cognitive
flexibility - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustress">Eustress
(Hans Seyle, 1976)</a>. More modern developments would be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_appraisal">Cognitive
Appraisal Models</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28psychology%29">Attribution
Theory</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_stress">Chronic Stress</a>
and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allostatic_load">Allostatic
Load</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s convinced stress is this outdated evolutionary
technology—poorly calibrated to modern life, something to avoid at all
costs. The story goes that it evolved to help us run from tigers, but
now it’s just triggered by email notifications. This is nonsense. Stress
is the only thing that gets us to perform at all. It’s the most valuable
biological technology we have. This lecture walks through the
Yerkes-Dodson Law—a simple, 100-year-old model that explains how stress
actually works, why we need it, and how to use it well.</p>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/stress-is-good">The Betterment article
that inspired this</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/yerkes-dodson-bias-vs-noise">More on
stress and cognitive flexibility</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/the-amygdala-is-not-the-fear-centre">Why
the amygdala doesn’t work the way you think</a></p>
<p><strong>References:</strong> - <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/12/change-feelings-circumstances/620876/">The
Atlantic Article, demonstrating the typical approach to stress</a> -
Sapolsky’s book <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Zebras_Don't_Get_Ulcers">Why
Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers</a> - <a href="https://btr.mt/analects/yerkes-dodson-bias-vs-noise">Yerkes Dodson
Law</a> - <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585969/full">Vartinian
et al. (2020)</a>, <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27576026/">Goldfarb et
al. (2017)</a>, <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5469305/">Lenow et
al. (2017)</a> or <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647765/">this
commentary</a> on the relationship between low stress and cognitive
flexibility - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustress">Eustress
(Hans Seyle, 1976)</a>. More modern developments would be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_appraisal">Cognitive
Appraisal Models</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28psychology%29">Attribution
Theory</a> - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_stress">Chronic Stress</a>
and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allostatic_load">Allostatic
Load</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 23:01:00 -0100</pubDate>
      <author>Dorian</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0c97697f/a458279d.mp3" length="24597511" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Dorian</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/sk6dciSQNU_C7GdqnEiyzg9aTPgKpMEIldWtlkA1qOQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80NjIw/NDc4ODAyNzMxOTcz/ZWVmNjkyZTdmZTk1/ZTVhZC5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1538</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Stress isn't broken by modern life. It's a performance tool, and the line between fuel and harm isn't the stressor. It's whether you control it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Stress isn't broken by modern life. It's a performance tool, and the line between fuel and harm isn't the stressor. It's whether you control it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>betterment, psychology, brain science, philosophy of mind, thought patterns, human behaviour, human behavior</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0c97697f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
