<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-boiling-frog" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The Boiling Frog</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-boiling-frog</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Reflections on the intersection of economics, history, politics, psychology, and science</description>
    <copyright>copyright 2022 Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>96f134e9-1a66-56b6-89d5-688ad9f931cf</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:40:46 -0800</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:41:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://www.theboilingfrog.net</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Government"/>
    <itunes:category text="History"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Pr9stmhyeiup0WwHgj7qDTruojFtf5CWSk6LZeKYpH8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzI3MTQ4LzE2NDEy/MjQzNDYtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Reflections on the intersection of economics, history, politics, psychology, and science</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Reflections on the intersection of economics, history, politics, psychology, and science.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Mark Olbert</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Gasleaping</title>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>30</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Gasleaping</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ba701a4e-1a5b-45d3-ae9f-78686c8419d7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/385cc0a7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why the Trump administration keeps repeating debunked claims? Or why it regularly denies objective evidence, and encourages everyone else to do the same? Welcome to the wonderful world of gaslighting! Tune in to the latest from your favorite amphibians to learn more!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why the Trump administration keeps repeating debunked claims? Or why it regularly denies objective evidence, and encourages everyone else to do the same? Welcome to the wonderful world of gaslighting! Tune in to the latest from your favorite amphibians to learn more!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:40:42 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/385cc0a7/d1756d9b.mp3" length="51149083" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2128</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why the Trump administration keeps repeating debunked claims? Or why it regularly denies objective evidence, and encourages everyone else to do the same? Welcome to the wonderful world of gaslighting! Tune in to the latest from your favorite amphibians to learn more!</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ribbiting Disparities</title>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>29</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Ribbiting Disparities</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d57a6ac4-a17a-4536-b540-ed8c8da22c29</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/41d57347</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This podcast explores the notion of income inequality. Although it’s an oft-discussed subject, it’s not always defined well or only discussed in the narrow band of the moral arguments against it. This discussion is meant to go deeper, including examining both the positive and negative aspects of inequality and its role in an economic system. Fundamentally, we’re asking the question as to whether some amount of inequality is a necessary byproduct of capitalism, or perhaps even a desirable outcome of an economic system. Therefore, we hypothesize that there may be an “optimal” amount of inequality in a society.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This podcast explores the notion of income inequality. Although it’s an oft-discussed subject, it’s not always defined well or only discussed in the narrow band of the moral arguments against it. This discussion is meant to go deeper, including examining both the positive and negative aspects of inequality and its role in an economic system. Fundamentally, we’re asking the question as to whether some amount of inequality is a necessary byproduct of capitalism, or perhaps even a desirable outcome of an economic system. Therefore, we hypothesize that there may be an “optimal” amount of inequality in a society.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:41:34 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/41d57347/0498d6b6.mp3" length="33940700" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1409</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This podcast explores the notion of income inequality. Although it’s an oft-discussed subject, it’s not always defined well or only discussed in the narrow band of the moral arguments against it. This discussion is meant to go deeper, including examining both the positive and negative aspects of inequality and its role in an economic system. Fundamentally, we’re asking the question as to whether some amount of inequality is a necessary byproduct of capitalism, or perhaps even a desirable outcome of an economic system. Therefore, we hypothesize that there may be an “optimal” amount of inequality in a society.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Frognosis</title>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>28</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Frognosis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0fa31889-fa43-4190-bb21-d178cebe3667</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8f572e9a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the political debates around public health and public health policy. It is a perfect case study to illustrate so many of the principles covered in earlier podcasts, such as capitalism, externalities, risk, paranoia, and the dumbing down of America.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the political debates around public health and public health policy. It is a perfect case study to illustrate so many of the principles covered in earlier podcasts, such as capitalism, externalities, risk, paranoia, and the dumbing down of America.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:42:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8f572e9a/555957aa.mp3" length="47162840" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1960</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the political debates around public health and public health policy. It is a perfect case study to illustrate so many of the principles covered in earlier podcasts, such as capitalism, externalities, risk, paranoia, and the dumbing down of America.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trade Wart</title>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>27</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Trade Wart</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2df175ec-84c8-4c84-a610-238fad7005b3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9db513c2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Welcome to The Boiling Frog reboot! The first 26 episodes were examinations of general topics,  such as understanding capitalism, how social psychology belies the principles of capitalism, and how this all shapes political dialog. The new podcasts will look at specific policies of the new administration and use those as case studies to illustrate the real-life impact of those general concepts.</p><p><br>We start with tariffs, a word that Donald Trump loves and is already deploying across multiple sectors and trading partners. The principles we examine go back to two earlier podcasts – our very first one, <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/01/03/1-laissez-frog/">Laissez Frog</a>, which was about capitalism in general, and our 21st episode, <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/11/21/21-greenbacks/">Greenbacks</a>, which was about taxes.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Welcome to The Boiling Frog reboot! The first 26 episodes were examinations of general topics,  such as understanding capitalism, how social psychology belies the principles of capitalism, and how this all shapes political dialog. The new podcasts will look at specific policies of the new administration and use those as case studies to illustrate the real-life impact of those general concepts.</p><p><br>We start with tariffs, a word that Donald Trump loves and is already deploying across multiple sectors and trading partners. The principles we examine go back to two earlier podcasts – our very first one, <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/01/03/1-laissez-frog/">Laissez Frog</a>, which was about capitalism in general, and our 21st episode, <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/11/21/21-greenbacks/">Greenbacks</a>, which was about taxes.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:28:31 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9db513c2/8eadbead.mp3" length="27929834" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1742</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Welcome to The Boiling Frog reboot! The first 26 episodes were examinations of general topics,  such as understanding capitalism, how social psychology belies the principles of capitalism, and how this all shapes political dialog. The new podcasts will look at specific policies of the new administration and use those as case studies to illustrate the real-life impact of those general concepts.</p><p><br>We start with tariffs, a word that Donald Trump loves and is already deploying across multiple sectors and trading partners. The principles we examine go back to two earlier podcasts – our very first one, <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/01/03/1-laissez-frog/">Laissez Frog</a>, which was about capitalism in general, and our 21st episode, <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/11/21/21-greenbacks/">Greenbacks</a>, which was about taxes.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jimmy Hoppa</title>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>26</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Jimmy Hoppa</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60a33bb1-1edf-4248-8d8f-b1f865a1eeaa</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0d65f827</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This podcast is all about labor unions – why they exist, their history in the U.S., a brief comparison with unions in other countries, the pros and cons of unions, and the larger political implications of their existence.</p><p><br>This is a controversial topic in U.S. politics, with many voters (and most elected officials) falling squarely into the “pro-union” or “anti-union” camp. But as with most issues, the truth is much more nuanced and complicated. Labor unions in the U.S. formed – and largely still exist – because of failures in market capitalism. As discussed in <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/01/03/1-laissez-frog/">our very first podcast</a>, capitalism is based on a number of principles to ensure resources are most efficiently allocated, but in real life those principles are rarely met. This is particularly pronounced in the labor market, which is fraught with friction and often monopsony employers.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This podcast is all about labor unions – why they exist, their history in the U.S., a brief comparison with unions in other countries, the pros and cons of unions, and the larger political implications of their existence.</p><p><br>This is a controversial topic in U.S. politics, with many voters (and most elected officials) falling squarely into the “pro-union” or “anti-union” camp. But as with most issues, the truth is much more nuanced and complicated. Labor unions in the U.S. formed – and largely still exist – because of failures in market capitalism. As discussed in <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/01/03/1-laissez-frog/">our very first podcast</a>, capitalism is based on a number of principles to ensure resources are most efficiently allocated, but in real life those principles are rarely met. This is particularly pronounced in the labor market, which is fraught with friction and often monopsony employers.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:49:02 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0d65f827/5b0150c6.mp3" length="54049869" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2222</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This podcast is all about labor unions – why they exist, their history in the U.S., a brief comparison with unions in other countries, the pros and cons of unions, and the larger political implications of their existence.</p><p><br>This is a controversial topic in U.S. politics, with many voters (and most elected officials) falling squarely into the “pro-union” or “anti-union” camp. But as with most issues, the truth is much more nuanced and complicated. Labor unions in the U.S. formed – and largely still exist – because of failures in market capitalism. As discussed in <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/01/03/1-laissez-frog/">our very first podcast</a>, capitalism is based on a number of principles to ensure resources are most efficiently allocated, but in real life those principles are rarely met. This is particularly pronounced in the labor market, which is fraught with friction and often monopsony employers.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jump for Joy</title>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>25</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Jump for Joy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de249a1d-f6db-40ff-9906-3abb22eb0149</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/86b1ad02</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Building off the <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/12/31/24-the-toad-not-taken/">prior podcast</a> on learning from the past, this discussion is all about success and failure. We all know the common wisdom that we all learn more from failure than from success, but of course we don’t strive to fail all of the time!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Building off the <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/12/31/24-the-toad-not-taken/">prior podcast</a> on learning from the past, this discussion is all about success and failure. We all know the common wisdom that we all learn more from failure than from success, but of course we don’t strive to fail all of the time!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/86b1ad02/8d906863.mp3" length="42836127" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1756</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Building off the <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net/2022/12/31/24-the-toad-not-taken/">prior podcast</a> on learning from the past, this discussion is all about success and failure. We all know the common wisdom that we all learn more from failure than from success, but of course we don’t strive to fail all of the time!</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Toad Not Taken</title>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>24</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Toad Not Taken</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">056f1d07-141d-477a-b235-47926b498ce5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e6ca2fd0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We all spend a lot of time thinking about the past, often when we're trying to make a decision in the present. Sometimes that reflection ends up complicating our decision-making. Why is that? And if we want to avoid repeating past mistakes while also not preventing ourselves from taking new paths, what's the proper way to use our knowledge of the past?]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[We all spend a lot of time thinking about the past, often when we're trying to make a decision in the present. Sometimes that reflection ends up complicating our decision-making. Why is that? And if we want to avoid repeating past mistakes while also not preventing ourselves from taking new paths, what's the proper way to use our knowledge of the past?]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 15:17:43 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e6ca2fd0/04513baa.mp3" length="49159352" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2020</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We all spend a lot of time thinking about the past, often when we're trying to make a decision in the present. Sometimes that reflection ends up complicating our decision-making. Why is that? And if we want to avoid repeating past mistakes while also not preventing ourselves from taking new paths, what's the proper way to use our knowledge of the past?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We all spend a lot of time thinking about the past, often when we're trying to make a decision in the present. Sometimes that reflection ends up complicating our decision-making. Why is that? And if we want to avoid repeating past mistakes while also not </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Polliwog Polymath</title>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>23</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Polliwog Polymath</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2100e264-75fa-4823-ac4b-649cd9d3d8cf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e70edb97</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What makes someone an expert? And how is expertise different from intelligence? This podcast is all about expertise, how we acquire it, how do people view others’ expertise, and the notion of expertise transference from one domain to another. We touch on a number of psychological phenomena, including the Dunning-Kruger Effect, which is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability at a task overestimate that ability. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What makes someone an expert? And how is expertise different from intelligence? This podcast is all about expertise, how we acquire it, how do people view others’ expertise, and the notion of expertise transference from one domain to another. We touch on a number of psychological phenomena, including the Dunning-Kruger Effect, which is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability at a task overestimate that ability. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 11:04:13 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e70edb97/4bff0acb.mp3" length="49683089" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2043</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What makes someone an expert? And how is expertise different from intelligence? This podcast is all about expertise, how we acquire it, how do people view others’ expertise, and the notion of expertise transference from one domain to another. We touch on a number of psychological phenomena, including the Dunning-Kruger Effect, which is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability at a task overestimate that ability. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What makes someone an expert? And how is expertise different from intelligence? This podcast is all about expertise, how we acquire it, how do people view others’ expertise, and the notion of expertise transference from one domain to another. We touch on </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It’s Not Easy Paying Green</title>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>It’s Not Easy Paying Green</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ffee66d7-4db9-491d-91ee-5a184861c9c0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e9f1d426</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This podcast is the sequel to Greenbacks, where we discussed why we have taxes, the different types of taxes, and the pros and cons of each type. In this podcast, we delve into the evolution of the tax system and look at the debates surrounding the level of tax rates, specifically some of the false choices presented in political discussions. And we delve deeply into one of the most famous “tax revolts” in U.S. history, California’s Proposition 13. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This podcast is the sequel to Greenbacks, where we discussed why we have taxes, the different types of taxes, and the pros and cons of each type. In this podcast, we delve into the evolution of the tax system and look at the debates surrounding the level of tax rates, specifically some of the false choices presented in political discussions. And we delve deeply into one of the most famous “tax revolts” in U.S. history, California’s Proposition 13. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 16:59:33 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e9f1d426/f7881f1b.mp3" length="47677061" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1961</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This podcast is the sequel to Greenbacks, where we discussed why we have taxes, the different types of taxes, and the pros and cons of each type. In this podcast, we delve into the evolution of the tax system and look at the debates surrounding the level of tax rates, specifically some of the false choices presented in political discussions. And we delve deeply into one of the most famous “tax revolts” in U.S. history, California’s Proposition 13. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This podcast is the sequel to Greenbacks, where we discussed why we have taxes, the different types of taxes, and the pros and cons of each type. In this podcast, we delve into the evolution of the tax system and look at the debates surrounding the level </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Greenbacks</title>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Greenbacks</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e34225c-fa2e-49dc-9348-bd103d7bb061</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/79d66ac7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
Benjamin Franklin

This podcast is the first in a two-part series on taxes. This episode is meant to be an overview of why we have taxes, the landscape of both taxing agencies and taxable agencies, as well as the different types of taxes. (It is recommended that listeners start with The Boiling Frog’s very first podcast on capitalism before listening to this one).]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
Benjamin Franklin

This podcast is the first in a two-part series on taxes. This episode is meant to be an overview of why we have taxes, the landscape of both taxing agencies and taxable agencies, as well as the different types of taxes. (It is recommended that listeners start with The Boiling Frog’s very first podcast on capitalism before listening to this one).]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:50:51 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/79d66ac7/dac0c3d4.mp3" length="41500196" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1704</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
Benjamin Franklin

This podcast is the first in a two-part series on taxes. This episode is meant to be an overview of why we have taxes, the landscape of both taxing agencies and taxable agencies, as well as the different types of taxes. (It is recommended that listeners start with The Boiling Frog’s very first podcast on capitalism before listening to this one).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
Benjamin Franklin

This podcast is the first in a two-part series on taxes. This episode is meant to be an overview of why we have taxes, the landscape of both taxing agencies a</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hops and Dreams</title>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>20</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Hops and Dreams</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c23aa4a8-839e-4dd1-a723-3f4150f71efb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fb9c7e97</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[For the tenth episode, your favorite pond dwellers decided to take a break from the normal, big-picture, topic-based discussions and instead shared their personal pet peeves, including both important as well as some silly issues.

This twentieth episode is also a diversion from the normal format, but your amphibious friends decided to do the “opposite” of pet peeves – in this case talk about reasons to be hopeful about the future. This was certainly a challenging discussion as previous podcast discussions could lead all of us to be very pessimistic about the fate of American democracy and our planet. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[For the tenth episode, your favorite pond dwellers decided to take a break from the normal, big-picture, topic-based discussions and instead shared their personal pet peeves, including both important as well as some silly issues.

This twentieth episode is also a diversion from the normal format, but your amphibious friends decided to do the “opposite” of pet peeves – in this case talk about reasons to be hopeful about the future. This was certainly a challenging discussion as previous podcast discussions could lead all of us to be very pessimistic about the fate of American democracy and our planet. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fb9c7e97/76770cd0.mp3" length="41146585" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1690</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For the tenth episode, your favorite pond dwellers decided to take a break from the normal, big-picture, topic-based discussions and instead shared their personal pet peeves, including both important as well as some silly issues.

This twentieth episode is also a diversion from the normal format, but your amphibious friends decided to do the “opposite” of pet peeves – in this case talk about reasons to be hopeful about the future. This was certainly a challenging discussion as previous podcast discussions could lead all of us to be very pessimistic about the fate of American democracy and our planet. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the tenth episode, your favorite pond dwellers decided to take a break from the normal, big-picture, topic-based discussions and instead shared their personal pet peeves, including both important as well as some silly issues.

This twentieth episode</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toad to the White House</title>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Toad to the White House</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a7ddb4a-55d6-46d3-911f-f29c1a384794</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0dfc77cf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This episode is a deep dive into the foundational requirement of a democracy – having elections and voting. Despite the founding (and often touted) principles of American democracy, it is shockingly inconsistent how we implement it. All U.S. citizens do not have an equal voice, the result of structural inequities in the system (e.g., the U.S. Senate), the leveraging of power to maintain power (e.g. Gerrymandering), the influence of money in primarily privately-funded elections, and a stubborn reliance on 18th and 19th century tools to solve 21st century problems. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This episode is a deep dive into the foundational requirement of a democracy – having elections and voting. Despite the founding (and often touted) principles of American democracy, it is shockingly inconsistent how we implement it. All U.S. citizens do not have an equal voice, the result of structural inequities in the system (e.g., the U.S. Senate), the leveraging of power to maintain power (e.g. Gerrymandering), the influence of money in primarily privately-funded elections, and a stubborn reliance on 18th and 19th century tools to solve 21st century problems. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 10:51:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0dfc77cf/d4615040.mp3" length="57686291" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2380</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode is a deep dive into the foundational requirement of a democracy – having elections and voting. Despite the founding (and often touted) principles of American democracy, it is shockingly inconsistent how we implement it. All U.S. citizens do not have an equal voice, the result of structural inequities in the system (e.g., the U.S. Senate), the leveraging of power to maintain power (e.g. Gerrymandering), the influence of money in primarily privately-funded elections, and a stubborn reliance on 18th and 19th century tools to solve 21st century problems. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode is a deep dive into the foundational requirement of a democracy – having elections and voting. Despite the founding (and often touted) principles of American democracy, it is shockingly inconsistent how we implement it. All U.S. citizens do n</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Waste, Frog and Abuse</title>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Waste, Frog and Abuse</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21ce2838-3cc9-4cf5-a6a2-c2d61264a956</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/afdc3c30</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It’s a fairly common trope – and often an overused campaign line – that government is “wasteful.” But what does it mean to be “wasteful” (or “efficient” for that matter), and is it true that governments aren’t good stewards of our money? As you can imagine, the answer isn’t as straightforward as it may appear. And if there’s one thing we at the Boiling Frog love to do, it’s dive into things that aren’t straightforward! So have a listen to our latest podcast, Waste, Frog and Abuse!]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It’s a fairly common trope – and often an overused campaign line – that government is “wasteful.” But what does it mean to be “wasteful” (or “efficient” for that matter), and is it true that governments aren’t good stewards of our money? As you can imagine, the answer isn’t as straightforward as it may appear. And if there’s one thing we at the Boiling Frog love to do, it’s dive into things that aren’t straightforward! So have a listen to our latest podcast, Waste, Frog and Abuse!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:38:29 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/afdc3c30/b666ab41.mp3" length="52203050" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2153</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It’s a fairly common trope – and often an overused campaign line – that government is “wasteful.” But what does it mean to be “wasteful” (or “efficient” for that matter), and is it true that governments aren’t good stewards of our money? As you can imagine, the answer isn’t as straightforward as it may appear. And if there’s one thing we at the Boiling Frog love to do, it’s dive into things that aren’t straightforward! So have a listen to our latest podcast, Waste, Frog and Abuse!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It’s a fairly common trope – and often an overused campaign line – that government is “wasteful.” But what does it mean to be “wasteful” (or “efficient” for that matter), and is it true that governments aren’t good stewards of our money? As you can imagin</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leap of Faith</title>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Leap of Faith</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdef34ec-d2d7-4d78-9bf8-0d2cea49b947</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/27ffdae6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The intersection of religion and politics, particularly in the U.S., has presented a series of issues and challenges. Starting with a very brief overview of the origin and history of religion, and how it has impacted human societies, we then dive into how religion and politics interact in the U.S. We explore that interaction in depth by focusing on Roe v. Wade and how Donald Trump was able to forge alliances with many fundamentalist Christian churches despite not living the kind of life those churches encourage their adherents to live. Given the importance and value of religion to so many people, what can we do to both accentuate the benefits and minimize or manage the risks it poses, particularly in the political sphere?]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The intersection of religion and politics, particularly in the U.S., has presented a series of issues and challenges. Starting with a very brief overview of the origin and history of religion, and how it has impacted human societies, we then dive into how religion and politics interact in the U.S. We explore that interaction in depth by focusing on Roe v. Wade and how Donald Trump was able to forge alliances with many fundamentalist Christian churches despite not living the kind of life those churches encourage their adherents to live. Given the importance and value of religion to so many people, what can we do to both accentuate the benefits and minimize or manage the risks it poses, particularly in the political sphere?]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2022 22:46:22 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/27ffdae6/d57df68c.mp3" length="56414765" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2330</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The intersection of religion and politics, particularly in the U.S., has presented a series of issues and challenges. Starting with a very brief overview of the origin and history of religion, and how it has impacted human societies, we then dive into how religion and politics interact in the U.S. We explore that interaction in depth by focusing on Roe v. Wade and how Donald Trump was able to forge alliances with many fundamentalist Christian churches despite not living the kind of life those churches encourage their adherents to live. Given the importance and value of religion to so many people, what can we do to both accentuate the benefits and minimize or manage the risks it poses, particularly in the political sphere?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The intersection of religion and politics, particularly in the U.S., has presented a series of issues and challenges. Starting with a very brief overview of the origin and history of religion, and how it has impacted human societies, we then dive into how</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Frogs and Prayers</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Frogs and Prayers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86db7746-e8dc-4084-a537-80d481815951</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3dc320ff</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In our current political climate, it seems like both policymakers and ordinary citizens are prone to use a label for something that sounds intelligent or interesting on the surface, but often masks a lack of substance or critical thinking. This matters more than you might think! If you'd like to know why, check out the latest installment from your amphibious friends at The Boiling Frog.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In our current political climate, it seems like both policymakers and ordinary citizens are prone to use a label for something that sounds intelligent or interesting on the surface, but often masks a lack of substance or critical thinking. This matters more than you might think! If you'd like to know why, check out the latest installment from your amphibious friends at The Boiling Frog.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2022 10:32:54 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3dc320ff/9932c35c.mp3" length="50151969" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2070</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In our current political climate, it seems like both policymakers and ordinary citizens are prone to use a label for something that sounds intelligent or interesting on the surface, but often masks a lack of substance or critical thinking. This matters more than you might think! If you'd like to know why, check out the latest installment from your amphibious friends at The Boiling Frog.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In our current political climate, it seems like both policymakers and ordinary citizens are prone to use a label for something that sounds intelligent or interesting on the surface, but often masks a lack of substance or critical thinking. This matters mo</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Frog by Any Other Name</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>A Frog by Any Other Name</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2bd5c08a-ac33-4aca-899f-1dbcb924ff31</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b5c78504</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It seems like every public facility – whether it be a building, bridge, airport, school, or park – is named after someone. Naming public things is so common, so accepted as a practice, that we don’t even think about why we do it, let alone debate whether we should or how we should do it. But is it as simple and straightforward a thing to do as we all seem to think? Or are there consequences which should be considered? In this podcast Seth and Mark debate the pros and cons of naming.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It seems like every public facility – whether it be a building, bridge, airport, school, or park – is named after someone. Naming public things is so common, so accepted as a practice, that we don’t even think about why we do it, let alone debate whether we should or how we should do it. But is it as simple and straightforward a thing to do as we all seem to think? Or are there consequences which should be considered? In this podcast Seth and Mark debate the pros and cons of naming.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 09:28:24 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b5c78504/5d8f29f6.mp3" length="59312944" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2453</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It seems like every public facility – whether it be a building, bridge, airport, school, or park – is named after someone. Naming public things is so common, so accepted as a practice, that we don’t even think about why we do it, let alone debate whether we should or how we should do it. But is it as simple and straightforward a thing to do as we all seem to think? Or are there consequences which should be considered? In this podcast Seth and Mark debate the pros and cons of naming.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It seems like every public facility – whether it be a building, bridge, airport, school, or park – is named after someone. Naming public things is so common, so accepted as a practice, that we don’t even think about why we do it, let alone debate whether </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Croak and Dagger</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Croak and Dagger</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7fcdc69c-5485-4734-8e15-cfa06618d357</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/30c86212</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This podcast focuses on paranoia, particularly its delusional form – why it exists, why it seems to be becoming a more common affliction, the dangers it poses, and what we can do about it.

Paranoia is thinking and feeling like you are being threatened in some way, but delusional paranoia is when there is sufficient evidence that a reasonable third party would conclude there’s no threat. Delusional paranoia is akin to an addiction and unfortunately can have very dangerous, even deadly, consequences.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This podcast focuses on paranoia, particularly its delusional form – why it exists, why it seems to be becoming a more common affliction, the dangers it poses, and what we can do about it.

Paranoia is thinking and feeling like you are being threatened in some way, but delusional paranoia is when there is sufficient evidence that a reasonable third party would conclude there’s no threat. Delusional paranoia is akin to an addiction and unfortunately can have very dangerous, even deadly, consequences.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:29:59 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/30c86212/501bc659.mp3" length="37421098" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1542</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This podcast focuses on paranoia, particularly its delusional form – why it exists, why it seems to be becoming a more common affliction, the dangers it poses, and what we can do about it.

Paranoia is thinking and feeling like you are being threatened in some way, but delusional paranoia is when there is sufficient evidence that a reasonable third party would conclude there’s no threat. Delusional paranoia is akin to an addiction and unfortunately can have very dangerous, even deadly, consequences.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This podcast focuses on paranoia, particularly its delusional form – why it exists, why it seems to be becoming a more common affliction, the dangers it poses, and what we can do about it.

Paranoia is thinking and feeling like you are being threatened </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Croak Therefore I Am</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>I Croak Therefore I Am</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99a0ea67-c853-441f-abec-41d8d5281484</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5022a2da</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In 2011, then presidential candidate Mitt Romney famously remarked “corporations are people, my friend” when confronted by hecklers at the Iowa State Fair. He was mocked and derided in many circles for this comment, which seemed to represent a politician blinded by his own corporate experience and success. But Romney was at least partially correct. in order to understand why we have corporate personhood, as well as to analyze what limits it should or should not have, one must examine both the nature of the corporation itself as well as the history of rights granted to these “fictional” entities. This podcast gives a brief history of the corporation and an overview of its various forms, at least in the U.S., and discusses the challenges our recent expansion of corporate rights has created.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In 2011, then presidential candidate Mitt Romney famously remarked “corporations are people, my friend” when confronted by hecklers at the Iowa State Fair. He was mocked and derided in many circles for this comment, which seemed to represent a politician blinded by his own corporate experience and success. But Romney was at least partially correct. in order to understand why we have corporate personhood, as well as to analyze what limits it should or should not have, one must examine both the nature of the corporation itself as well as the history of rights granted to these “fictional” entities. This podcast gives a brief history of the corporation and an overview of its various forms, at least in the U.S., and discusses the challenges our recent expansion of corporate rights has created.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:12:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5022a2da/7eeafd9e.mp3" length="40236610" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1660</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2011, then presidential candidate Mitt Romney famously remarked “corporations are people, my friend” when confronted by hecklers at the Iowa State Fair. He was mocked and derided in many circles for this comment, which seemed to represent a politician blinded by his own corporate experience and success. But Romney was at least partially correct. in order to understand why we have corporate personhood, as well as to analyze what limits it should or should not have, one must examine both the nature of the corporation itself as well as the history of rights granted to these “fictional” entities. This podcast gives a brief history of the corporation and an overview of its various forms, at least in the U.S., and discusses the challenges our recent expansion of corporate rights has created.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2011, then presidential candidate Mitt Romney famously remarked “corporations are people, my friend” when confronted by hecklers at the Iowa State Fair. He was mocked and derided in many circles for this comment, which seemed to represent a politician </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Warts and All</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Warts and All</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca6713a3-80dc-448c-a200-8fb283b03bd0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/490e84bb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While serving as locally elected officials, we’d hear all the time from residents asking us why government didn’t act more like a business. After all, isn’t it capitalism that made this country great, so why doesn’t government operate in the same way? This podcast explores why most of us wouldn't want government to act like a business while highlighting areas where government can learn from business. It ends with some recommendations on what we can each do to ensure government doesn't get overwhelmed by the misapplication of business principles.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[While serving as locally elected officials, we’d hear all the time from residents asking us why government didn’t act more like a business. After all, isn’t it capitalism that made this country great, so why doesn’t government operate in the same way? This podcast explores why most of us wouldn't want government to act like a business while highlighting areas where government can learn from business. It ends with some recommendations on what we can each do to ensure government doesn't get overwhelmed by the misapplication of business principles.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:45:09 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/490e84bb/53efb9d3.mp3" length="54996705" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2276</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While serving as locally elected officials, we’d hear all the time from residents asking us why government didn’t act more like a business. After all, isn’t it capitalism that made this country great, so why doesn’t government operate in the same way? This podcast explores why most of us wouldn't want government to act like a business while highlighting areas where government can learn from business. It ends with some recommendations on what we can each do to ensure government doesn't get overwhelmed by the misapplication of business principles.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While serving as locally elected officials, we’d hear all the time from residents asking us why government didn’t act more like a business. After all, isn’t it capitalism that made this country great, so why doesn’t government operate in the same way? Thi</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brain Frog</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Brain Frog</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea84dfa9-4329-4b0b-9838-30a38bf7d75c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f8203b5f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It feels like America has gotten dumber over the last few decades. Is that indeed true, and if so, why? As that is a bit vague and pejorative, the podcast looks at more specific issues, including ignorance, intellectual stubbornness, and lack of critical thinking.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It feels like America has gotten dumber over the last few decades. Is that indeed true, and if so, why? As that is a bit vague and pejorative, the podcast looks at more specific issues, including ignorance, intellectual stubbornness, and lack of critical thinking.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 16:56:17 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f8203b5f/3626ec32.mp3" length="47971484" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1984</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It feels like America has gotten dumber over the last few decades. Is that indeed true, and if so, why? As that is a bit vague and pejorative, the podcast looks at more specific issues, including ignorance, intellectual stubbornness, and lack of critical thinking.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It feels like America has gotten dumber over the last few decades. Is that indeed true, and if so, why? As that is a bit vague and pejorative, the podcast looks at more specific issues, including ignorance, intellectual stubbornness, and lack of critical </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toad You So</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Toad You So</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb5313e3-164f-4c57-9311-1e1e9149c67c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ff953de3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[For this tenth episode, Seth and Mark decided to have a little fun and stray from the modus operandi of the first nine episodes of The Boiling Frog. Just for fun, our hosts make this episode a series of diatribes, fulfilling the expectations of Seth’s wife who, when first told about our idea for a podcast, asked “what are you going to call it...the angry rantings of two old white men?”

This special episode is a fun and mostly light discussion about our hosts’ personal pet peeves, some rooted in issues discussed in previous podcasts and some just random rantings of old white privileged men. Issues discussed range from the sublime (making capitalism more efficient) to the ridiculous (names on football uniforms).

If you have your own pet peeve you’d like to share, please send us a note as we’d love to read about it!]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[For this tenth episode, Seth and Mark decided to have a little fun and stray from the modus operandi of the first nine episodes of The Boiling Frog. Just for fun, our hosts make this episode a series of diatribes, fulfilling the expectations of Seth’s wife who, when first told about our idea for a podcast, asked “what are you going to call it...the angry rantings of two old white men?”

This special episode is a fun and mostly light discussion about our hosts’ personal pet peeves, some rooted in issues discussed in previous podcasts and some just random rantings of old white privileged men. Issues discussed range from the sublime (making capitalism more efficient) to the ridiculous (names on football uniforms).

If you have your own pet peeve you’d like to share, please send us a note as we’d love to read about it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 09:01:52 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ff953de3/b3d48ef1.mp3" length="48210802" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1995</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For this tenth episode, Seth and Mark decided to have a little fun and stray from the modus operandi of the first nine episodes of The Boiling Frog. Just for fun, our hosts make this episode a series of diatribes, fulfilling the expectations of Seth’s wife who, when first told about our idea for a podcast, asked “what are you going to call it...the angry rantings of two old white men?”

This special episode is a fun and mostly light discussion about our hosts’ personal pet peeves, some rooted in issues discussed in previous podcasts and some just random rantings of old white privileged men. Issues discussed range from the sublime (making capitalism more efficient) to the ridiculous (names on football uniforms).

If you have your own pet peeve you’d like to share, please send us a note as we’d love to read about it!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For this tenth episode, Seth and Mark decided to have a little fun and stray from the modus operandi of the first nine episodes of The Boiling Frog. Just for fun, our hosts make this episode a series of diatribes, fulfilling the expectations of Seth’s wif</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Froggy Skies</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Froggy Skies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9a01cad-8607-454b-ab79-fdeb6ef8e7cb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1f74f499</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Risk is a concept not well understood by many people, particularly in a financial context. In this podcast we explore what it means in depth, why it is often a balancing factor for rewards, and how a better understanding of risk and reward can lead to better community outcomes.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Risk is a concept not well understood by many people, particularly in a financial context. In this podcast we explore what it means in depth, why it is often a balancing factor for rewards, and how a better understanding of risk and reward can lead to better community outcomes.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:49:11 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1f74f499/67cf28e6.mp3" length="50344497" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2085</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Risk is a concept not well understood by many people, particularly in a financial context. In this podcast we explore what it means in depth, why it is often a balancing factor for rewards, and how a better understanding of risk and reward can lead to better community outcomes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Risk is a concept not well understood by many people, particularly in a financial context. In this podcast we explore what it means in depth, why it is often a balancing factor for rewards, and how a better understanding of risk and reward can lead to bet</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toadtalitarian</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Toadtalitarian</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15bc75ab-404f-46ed-ba7b-84740295abd3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d801bc88</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A follow up from The Changing Lily Pad, this podcast explores why corruption exists, where it comes from and why it appears that there is more corruption in people and organizations that are conservative.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A follow up from The Changing Lily Pad, this podcast explores why corruption exists, where it comes from and why it appears that there is more corruption in people and organizations that are conservative.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 18:19:40 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d801bc88/347ddccb.mp3" length="50490209" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2092</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A follow up from The Changing Lily Pad, this podcast explores why corruption exists, where it comes from and why it appears that there is more corruption in people and organizations that are conservative.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A follow up from The Changing Lily Pad, this podcast explores why corruption exists, where it comes from and why it appears that there is more corruption in people and organizations that are conservative.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toad Rage</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Toad Rage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be23013d-98ba-4d0f-87c8-4c76320fda8a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fbd03705</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[“Wokeness” and “Cancel Culture” are popular terms in our modern political and social parlance, but what do they actually mean? How should we think about the concept of “canceling” – is it behavior gone too far, or is it just about accountability?]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[“Wokeness” and “Cancel Culture” are popular terms in our modern political and social parlance, but what do they actually mean? How should we think about the concept of “canceling” – is it behavior gone too far, or is it just about accountability?]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:08:45 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fbd03705/48f8419e.mp3" length="48516786" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2011</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Wokeness” and “Cancel Culture” are popular terms in our modern political and social parlance, but what do they actually mean? How should we think about the concept of “canceling” – is it behavior gone too far, or is it just about accountability?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Wokeness” and “Cancel Culture” are popular terms in our modern political and social parlance, but what do they actually mean? How should we think about the concept of “canceling” – is it behavior gone too far, or is it just about accountability?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jumping to Conclusions</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Jumping to Conclusions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">105d8d4c-8d9c-40d4-a059-f42fb0fbb6c5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9daac5e9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How Hindsight Bias is not just an academic concept, but rather a critical flaw in human’s ability to think critically and avoid logical fallacies, particularly in issues of crime and gun rights.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How Hindsight Bias is not just an academic concept, but rather a critical flaw in human’s ability to think critically and avoid logical fallacies, particularly in issues of crime and gun rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9daac5e9/a085ccae.mp3" length="42044108" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1743</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How Hindsight Bias is not just an academic concept, but rather a critical flaw in human’s ability to think critically and avoid logical fallacies, particularly in issues of crime and gun rights.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How Hindsight Bias is not just an academic concept, but rather a critical flaw in human’s ability to think critically and avoid logical fallacies, particularly in issues of crime and gun rights.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Amphibian's Dilemma</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Amphibian's Dilemma</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8271dc2e-b83a-4af8-823a-a9e7d44ca65e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/91c29057</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How a very simple concept in game theory – the Prisoner’s Dilemma – is omnipresent in our economic lives and in almost all social interactions, and the tension between individual incentives and societal good.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How a very simple concept in game theory – the Prisoner’s Dilemma – is omnipresent in our economic lives and in almost all social interactions, and the tension between individual incentives and societal good.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 08:20:37 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/91c29057/38ee8c2f.mp3" length="36385544" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1509</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How a very simple concept in game theory – the Prisoner’s Dilemma – is omnipresent in our economic lives and in almost all social interactions, and the tension between individual incentives and societal good.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How a very simple concept in game theory – the Prisoner’s Dilemma – is omnipresent in our economic lives and in almost all social interactions, and the tension between individual incentives and societal good.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lord of the Frogs</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Lord of the Frogs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ca52c5e-f1fc-4963-a8b2-3ccf6ac686bf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6d641692</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A discussion of the role of the local elected representative, the nature of political leadership particularly in a group setting, the traps that electeds fall into, and what we have learned from being local officials.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A discussion of the role of the local elected representative, the nature of political leadership particularly in a group setting, the traps that electeds fall into, and what we have learned from being local officials.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 20:18:44 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6d641692/34f63cc2.mp3" length="59357133" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2466</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A discussion of the role of the local elected representative, the nature of political leadership particularly in a group setting, the traps that electeds fall into, and what we have learned from being local officials.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A discussion of the role of the local elected representative, the nature of political leadership particularly in a group setting, the traps that electeds fall into, and what we have learned from being local officials.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Makes Me Unhoppy</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Makes Me Unhoppy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2530ca77-bae6-46ca-a014-1ec724c048fc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bd2a7d42</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How understanding externalities is critical for both economics and public policy, but also how the claim of harm is often without merit but used as an argument against change, to protect one’s self-interest, or otherwise for political purposes.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How understanding externalities is critical for both economics and public policy, but also how the claim of harm is often without merit but used as an argument against change, to protect one’s self-interest, or otherwise for political purposes.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 20:34:27 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bd2a7d42/1a4ae184.mp3" length="36290742" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1505</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How understanding externalities is critical for both economics and public policy, but also how the claim of harm is often without merit but used as an argument against change, to protect one’s self-interest, or otherwise for political purposes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How understanding externalities is critical for both economics and public policy, but also how the claim of harm is often without merit but used as an argument against change, to protect one’s self-interest, or otherwise for political purposes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Changing Lily Pad</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Changing Lily Pad</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95ed30a9-bf1e-4512-b766-77d1c0674948</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c2b5cf6a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Understanding the conflict between progressivism vs. conservatism, particularly in the context of local communities…and the case that change is both inevitable and desirable. </p><p>For more information, please visit our website at <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net">https://www.theboilingfrog.net</a>.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Understanding the conflict between progressivism vs. conservatism, particularly in the context of local communities…and the case that change is both inevitable and desirable. </p><p>For more information, please visit our website at <a href="https://www.theboilingfrog.net">https://www.theboilingfrog.net</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c2b5cf6a/ed719571.mp3" length="54838580" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2276</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Understanding the conflict between progressivism vs. conservatism, particularly in the context of local communities…and the case that change is both inevitable and desirable.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Understanding the conflict between progressivism vs. conservatism, particularly in the context of local communities…and the case that change is both inevitable and desirable.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>economics history politics psychology science</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Laissez Frog</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Laissez Frog</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10d3d0e2-1f51-4ad5-abee-f5d77a5a5517</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/16ef1724</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>How social psychology requires us to reframe how we view market capitalism, what makes it successful and the government's role in maximizing its potential.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>How social psychology requires us to reframe how we view market capitalism, what makes it successful and the government's role in maximizing its potential.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 07:54:22 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/16ef1724/4cac27e1.mp3" length="39017229" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Seth Rosenblatt and Mark Olbert</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1607</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How social psychology requires us to reframe how we view market capitalism, what makes it successful and the government's role in maximizing its potential.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How social psychology requires us to reframe how we view market capitalism, what makes it successful and the government's role in maximizing its potential.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>capitalism government psychology</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
