<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-bike-lawyer" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The Bike Lawyer</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-bike-lawyer</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Most of what decides a bicycle crash happens long before anyone sees a courtroom. The Bike Lawyer covers what actually keeps riders safe, what the research really says, and what the law does and does not do for you after a driver puts you on the pavement.

Hosted by George Palaidis, a Florida lawyer and cyclist who represents riders who get hit. Episodes cover passing distance laws, what to do at a crash scene, insurance and PIP after a crash, and the difference between a legal e-bike and an unregistered motorcycle. Every episode also explains what the topic means in Florida, consistently one of the most dangerous states in the country to ride a bike.</description>
    <copyright>© 2026 George C. Palaidis</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>afac383f-9da7-5b0c-95fb-4b7f70887785</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:46:21 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:47:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://www.palaidislaw.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Education">
      <itunes:category text="How To"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Sports"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/5cUgFQz04LdqczVjv5tHbyPGfGXgiLrpHaFYCUmTytQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9kNGQ1/OWFmOTFmYjFmOWE4/NzlkMmVhZWMxMmJj/NDllZC5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Most of what decides a bicycle crash happens long before anyone sees a courtroom. The Bike Lawyer covers what actually keeps riders safe, what the research really says, and what the law does and does not do for you after a driver puts you on the pavement.

Hosted by George Palaidis, a Florida lawyer and cyclist who represents riders who get hit. Episodes cover passing distance laws, what to do at a crash scene, insurance and PIP after a crash, and the difference between a legal e-bike and an unregistered motorcycle. Every episode also explains what the topic means in Florida, consistently one of the most dangerous states in the country to ride a bike.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Most of what decides a bicycle crash happens long before anyone sees a courtroom.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>George C. Palaidis</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>3 Feet Isn’t the Answer You Think It Is</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>3 Feet Isn’t the Answer You Think It Is</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d18ed104-de62-4b7a-bf63-06d677b07a75</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d750bb32</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Three feet. That's the number every cyclist has heard. It is also not the number in about a dozen states, and in a few states it is not even the right question to ask.</p><p>Florida requires a safe distance of at least three feet when a driver passes a bicyclist — the same minimum whether or not you're riding in a bike lane. But that number is a legal floor, not proof that a pass was safe. A driver can pass you by three feet and still violate the statute, and understanding why matters a great deal if you are ever the one on the pavement trying to explain what happened.</p><p><br>Other states don't use three feet at all. Some scale the distance to the car's speed. Some discard the fixed number entirely and ask whether the pass left enough room for the rider to fall over without being hit. And a handful don't treat it as a distance question in the first place — they require the driver to change lanes or slow down rather than squeeze by.</p><p>In this episode: why Florida's three-foot rule is a minimum, not a safe harbor; the states with no fixed number at all and the proof problems that creates; the speed-based rules in South Dakota and New Hampshire; the "fall over" standard in Rhode Island and Oregon; the higher minimums in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania; the move-over laws in Georgia, New Jersey, Delaware, and Washington; and what Florida allows that Delaware does not.</p><p><br>I close with what you should document if a driver ever puts you in that position — whether it was a close pass that scared you or a crash that left you down.</p><p>Originally posted on YouTube at The Bike Lawyer on September 3, 2026. This is part of our Thursday replays, in which we bring the back catalog to the podcast feed.</p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER: This episode is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its own facts. Hiring a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask me to send you free written information about my qualifications and experience. George Palaidis is licensed to practice law in Florida.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Three feet. That's the number every cyclist has heard. It is also not the number in about a dozen states, and in a few states it is not even the right question to ask.</p><p>Florida requires a safe distance of at least three feet when a driver passes a bicyclist — the same minimum whether or not you're riding in a bike lane. But that number is a legal floor, not proof that a pass was safe. A driver can pass you by three feet and still violate the statute, and understanding why matters a great deal if you are ever the one on the pavement trying to explain what happened.</p><p><br>Other states don't use three feet at all. Some scale the distance to the car's speed. Some discard the fixed number entirely and ask whether the pass left enough room for the rider to fall over without being hit. And a handful don't treat it as a distance question in the first place — they require the driver to change lanes or slow down rather than squeeze by.</p><p>In this episode: why Florida's three-foot rule is a minimum, not a safe harbor; the states with no fixed number at all and the proof problems that creates; the speed-based rules in South Dakota and New Hampshire; the "fall over" standard in Rhode Island and Oregon; the higher minimums in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania; the move-over laws in Georgia, New Jersey, Delaware, and Washington; and what Florida allows that Delaware does not.</p><p><br>I close with what you should document if a driver ever puts you in that position — whether it was a close pass that scared you or a crash that left you down.</p><p>Originally posted on YouTube at The Bike Lawyer on September 3, 2026. This is part of our Thursday replays, in which we bring the back catalog to the podcast feed.</p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER: This episode is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its own facts. Hiring a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask me to send you free written information about my qualifications and experience. George Palaidis is licensed to practice law in Florida.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:46:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d750bb32/d061857f.mp3" length="8406590" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzTn9Ma9WdA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/OASgSM-t_o6Xcs3XfTrozTZnIzNK8OGk-1_3l4UHmqA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS84OTBl/NTc3Y2IyMTQzYzAz/MjhjN2MxYTMyZjQ3/OGNkNS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>522</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Three feet. That's the number every cyclist has heard. It is also not the number in about a dozen states, and in a few states it is not even the right question to ask.</p><p>Florida requires a safe distance of at least three feet when a driver passes a bicyclist — the same minimum whether or not you're riding in a bike lane. But that number is a legal floor, not proof that a pass was safe. A driver can pass you by three feet and still violate the statute, and understanding why matters a great deal if you are ever the one on the pavement trying to explain what happened.</p><p><br>Other states don't use three feet at all. Some scale the distance to the car's speed. Some discard the fixed number entirely and ask whether the pass left enough room for the rider to fall over without being hit. And a handful don't treat it as a distance question in the first place — they require the driver to change lanes or slow down rather than squeeze by.</p><p>In this episode: why Florida's three-foot rule is a minimum, not a safe harbor; the states with no fixed number at all and the proof problems that creates; the speed-based rules in South Dakota and New Hampshire; the "fall over" standard in Rhode Island and Oregon; the higher minimums in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania; the move-over laws in Georgia, New Jersey, Delaware, and Washington; and what Florida allows that Delaware does not.</p><p><br>I close with what you should document if a driver ever puts you in that position — whether it was a close pass that scared you or a crash that left you down.</p><p>Originally posted on YouTube at The Bike Lawyer on September 3, 2026. This is part of our Thursday replays, in which we bring the back catalog to the podcast feed.</p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER: This episode is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its own facts. Hiring a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask me to send you free written information about my qualifications and experience. George Palaidis is licensed to practice law in Florida.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Dangerous Bike Crashes &amp; How to Avoid Them (Replay)</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>3 Dangerous Bike Crashes &amp; How to Avoid Them (Replay)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71726235-ac29-45eb-86e0-b6063734e853</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/20399d11</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on The Bike Lawyer channel on YouTube on July 30. This is part of our Thursday replays, where we bring the back catalog to the podcast feed.</p><p>Most bike-car crashes aren’t random. They follow a handful of patterns, and almost nobody teaches cyclists how to spot them before it’s too late.<br>This is part one of a two-part series on the five most dangerous situations for cyclists sharing the road with cars. Using federal crash data from the past 30 years, this episode covers the three crash types caused by moving vehicles: the turning conflict, which causes more crashes than any other single cause; the intersection habit most cyclists overlook; and why overtaking crashes are rarer yet disproportionately deadly on faster roads. Plus a three-move fix you can use on your next ride, Florida’s cyclist fatality numbers, and the state laws that apply every time a car passes you.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on The Bike Lawyer channel on YouTube on July 30. This is part of our Thursday replays, where we bring the back catalog to the podcast feed.</p><p>Most bike-car crashes aren’t random. They follow a handful of patterns, and almost nobody teaches cyclists how to spot them before it’s too late.<br>This is part one of a two-part series on the five most dangerous situations for cyclists sharing the road with cars. Using federal crash data from the past 30 years, this episode covers the three crash types caused by moving vehicles: the turning conflict, which causes more crashes than any other single cause; the intersection habit most cyclists overlook; and why overtaking crashes are rarer yet disproportionately deadly on faster roads. Plus a three-move fix you can use on your next ride, Florida’s cyclist fatality numbers, and the state laws that apply every time a car passes you.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:25:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/20399d11/297992c3.mp3" length="7147904" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xg1ZsGOLpPY">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Rt-Q9PiIGUfPTTjapHs6YAzdhtmVHFuFfXwHciZ6JaI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81ZDgx/YzRjOTkwZTI5ZTcw/YzkwZDU3NzIxYjcz/YTE4Yi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on The Bike Lawyer channel on YouTube on July 30. This is part of our Thursday replays, where we bring the back catalog to the podcast feed.</p><p>Most bike-car crashes aren’t random. They follow a handful of patterns, and almost nobody teaches cyclists how to spot them before it’s too late.<br>This is part one of a two-part series on the five most dangerous situations for cyclists sharing the road with cars. Using federal crash data from the past 30 years, this episode covers the three crash types caused by moving vehicles: the turning conflict, which causes more crashes than any other single cause; the intersection habit most cyclists overlook; and why overtaking crashes are rarer yet disproportionately deadly on faster roads. Plus a three-move fix you can use on your next ride, Florida’s cyclist fatality numbers, and the state laws that apply every time a car passes you.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When Drivers See Bicyclists as Less Human (Replay)</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When Drivers See Bicyclists as Less Human (Replay)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce1ef2ee-86b7-42fa-8b0d-27e68a9896ba</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ea2f8d51</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on YouTube on August 14. This is part of our Thursday replays, in which we bring audio from previous YouTube videos to the podcast feed.</p><p>Researchers showed 563 people pairs of photographs of cyclists and asked one question: which of the two looks less human?</p><p>Same model. Same bike. The only thing that changed was what was on the rider's head or chest.</p><p><br>Seven out of ten times, people picked the rider wearing the helmet. Nearly eight out of ten times, they picked the rider in the high-visibility vest. The safety gear performed worse than no safety gear at all.</p><p>The researchers expected the helmet was simply hiding the rider's face. A baseball cap covers about as much and barely moved the needle. It was not the covered face. It was the safety equipment itself.</p><p><br>And when people rate cyclists on a scale of zero to one hundred for how human they are, three percent rate them at zero. Not low. Zero. The people who rate cyclists that way report about twice as many deliberate acts of aggression toward them.</p><p>That's a photographic study, and photographs don't drive. So here's what it looks like on pavement. In 2011, Florida's own Department of Transportation put cameras on nineteen roads in ten Florida cities and measured the passing distance of 2,185 drivers as they passed a bicyclist. Riders in ordinary street clothes got about four inches more room than those in a cycling kit. The state's own researchers couldn't explain it and settled on the idea that motorists "perceive less risk passing riders who are in bicycle outfits."</p><p>In this episode: what that Florida study proves and what it doesn't, what one researcher found after riding the same road for six months in seven different outfits with a sensor on his bike, and the only two things anyone has ever tested that actually changed how drivers behave. Neither is bright clothing. One is a piece of plastic on a stick from 1979.</p><p>I also explain what actually determines how much room you get, because it is not your jersey and it is not close. The original video is on YouTube at The Bike Lawyer.</p><p><strong>Studies referenced</strong><br> Limb &amp; Collyer (2023), Transportation Research Part F<br> Delbosc et al. (2019), Transportation Research Part F<br> Haworth et al. (2018), Journal of Transport &amp; Health<br> Walker, Garrard &amp; Jowitt (2014), Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention<br> Walker (2007) and Walker &amp; Robinson (2019), Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention<br> Rubie et al. (2020), Transport Reviews<br> Feizi et al. (2021), Transportation Research Part A<br> Claros et al. (2024), Transportation Research Part F</p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER: This episode is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Listening to it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case turns on its own facts. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask me to send you free written information about my qualifications and experience. George Palaidis is licensed to practice law in Florida.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on YouTube on August 14. This is part of our Thursday replays, in which we bring audio from previous YouTube videos to the podcast feed.</p><p>Researchers showed 563 people pairs of photographs of cyclists and asked one question: which of the two looks less human?</p><p>Same model. Same bike. The only thing that changed was what was on the rider's head or chest.</p><p><br>Seven out of ten times, people picked the rider wearing the helmet. Nearly eight out of ten times, they picked the rider in the high-visibility vest. The safety gear performed worse than no safety gear at all.</p><p>The researchers expected the helmet was simply hiding the rider's face. A baseball cap covers about as much and barely moved the needle. It was not the covered face. It was the safety equipment itself.</p><p><br>And when people rate cyclists on a scale of zero to one hundred for how human they are, three percent rate them at zero. Not low. Zero. The people who rate cyclists that way report about twice as many deliberate acts of aggression toward them.</p><p>That's a photographic study, and photographs don't drive. So here's what it looks like on pavement. In 2011, Florida's own Department of Transportation put cameras on nineteen roads in ten Florida cities and measured the passing distance of 2,185 drivers as they passed a bicyclist. Riders in ordinary street clothes got about four inches more room than those in a cycling kit. The state's own researchers couldn't explain it and settled on the idea that motorists "perceive less risk passing riders who are in bicycle outfits."</p><p>In this episode: what that Florida study proves and what it doesn't, what one researcher found after riding the same road for six months in seven different outfits with a sensor on his bike, and the only two things anyone has ever tested that actually changed how drivers behave. Neither is bright clothing. One is a piece of plastic on a stick from 1979.</p><p>I also explain what actually determines how much room you get, because it is not your jersey and it is not close. The original video is on YouTube at The Bike Lawyer.</p><p><strong>Studies referenced</strong><br> Limb &amp; Collyer (2023), Transportation Research Part F<br> Delbosc et al. (2019), Transportation Research Part F<br> Haworth et al. (2018), Journal of Transport &amp; Health<br> Walker, Garrard &amp; Jowitt (2014), Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention<br> Walker (2007) and Walker &amp; Robinson (2019), Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention<br> Rubie et al. (2020), Transport Reviews<br> Feizi et al. (2021), Transportation Research Part A<br> Claros et al. (2024), Transportation Research Part F</p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER: This episode is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Listening to it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case turns on its own facts. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask me to send you free written information about my qualifications and experience. George Palaidis is licensed to practice law in Florida.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 11:15:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ea2f8d51/737f4c11.mp3" length="11337307" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5i8HsMJzeo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/bZO0E4B41lg_wjg6yNGrUEMpNfqGQfERS4zs3McPxDo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hNjlj/NWQyZWFjNjZlNzcx/NWYyMWRjYWVmNmVm/MmFhYi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>705</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originally posted on YouTube on August 14. This is part of our Thursday replays, in which we bring audio from previous YouTube videos to the podcast feed.</p><p>Researchers showed 563 people pairs of photographs of cyclists and asked one question: which of the two looks less human?</p><p>Same model. Same bike. The only thing that changed was what was on the rider's head or chest.</p><p><br>Seven out of ten times, people picked the rider wearing the helmet. Nearly eight out of ten times, they picked the rider in the high-visibility vest. The safety gear performed worse than no safety gear at all.</p><p>The researchers expected the helmet was simply hiding the rider's face. A baseball cap covers about as much and barely moved the needle. It was not the covered face. It was the safety equipment itself.</p><p><br>And when people rate cyclists on a scale of zero to one hundred for how human they are, three percent rate them at zero. Not low. Zero. The people who rate cyclists that way report about twice as many deliberate acts of aggression toward them.</p><p>That's a photographic study, and photographs don't drive. So here's what it looks like on pavement. In 2011, Florida's own Department of Transportation put cameras on nineteen roads in ten Florida cities and measured the passing distance of 2,185 drivers as they passed a bicyclist. Riders in ordinary street clothes got about four inches more room than those in a cycling kit. The state's own researchers couldn't explain it and settled on the idea that motorists "perceive less risk passing riders who are in bicycle outfits."</p><p>In this episode: what that Florida study proves and what it doesn't, what one researcher found after riding the same road for six months in seven different outfits with a sensor on his bike, and the only two things anyone has ever tested that actually changed how drivers behave. Neither is bright clothing. One is a piece of plastic on a stick from 1979.</p><p>I also explain what actually determines how much room you get, because it is not your jersey and it is not close. The original video is on YouTube at The Bike Lawyer.</p><p><strong>Studies referenced</strong><br> Limb &amp; Collyer (2023), Transportation Research Part F<br> Delbosc et al. (2019), Transportation Research Part F<br> Haworth et al. (2018), Journal of Transport &amp; Health<br> Walker, Garrard &amp; Jowitt (2014), Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention<br> Walker (2007) and Walker &amp; Robinson (2019), Accident Analysis &amp; Prevention<br> Rubie et al. (2020), Transport Reviews<br> Feizi et al. (2021), Transportation Research Part A<br> Claros et al. (2024), Transportation Research Part F</p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER: This episode is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Listening to it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case turns on its own facts. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask me to send you free written information about my qualifications and experience. George Palaidis is licensed to practice law in Florida.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The E-Bike Insurance Gap Nobody Mentions</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The E-Bike Insurance Gap Nobody Mentions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d34d7687-d26e-4b76-a8f5-b956ddb92ea4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/160f4879</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A driver hits you on your e-bike. Four coverage layers may apply. Most e-bike riders don't know what they are, let alone the order to check them.</p><p>This is the audio version of the YouTube video "Hit by a Car on Your E-Bike? (I'm a Lawyer)" from The Bike Lawyer channel. If you want the full visual experience — on-screen statute citations, case law references, state-by-state graphics, and the coverage layer checklist — head to youtube.com/@thebikelawyerfl and search for the title above.</p><p>For listeners who prefer audio, this episode covers the correct order to check your coverage after an e-bike crash, why your state's e-bike classification doesn't automatically answer the insurance question, what to look for in your own policy, and what changes if the machine was modified beyond its legal class limits.</p><p>This is Part 2 of a two-part series. Part 1 covers the same coverage layers for traditional cyclists and is available now in this feed.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A driver hits you on your e-bike. Four coverage layers may apply. Most e-bike riders don't know what they are, let alone the order to check them.</p><p>This is the audio version of the YouTube video "Hit by a Car on Your E-Bike? (I'm a Lawyer)" from The Bike Lawyer channel. If you want the full visual experience — on-screen statute citations, case law references, state-by-state graphics, and the coverage layer checklist — head to youtube.com/@thebikelawyerfl and search for the title above.</p><p>For listeners who prefer audio, this episode covers the correct order to check your coverage after an e-bike crash, why your state's e-bike classification doesn't automatically answer the insurance question, what to look for in your own policy, and what changes if the machine was modified beyond its legal class limits.</p><p>This is Part 2 of a two-part series. Part 1 covers the same coverage layers for traditional cyclists and is available now in this feed.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:34:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/160f4879/25c9e687.mp3" length="10782363" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wOM8rCPHJk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/xokrGMfQ4GPmw7ZCis8bHbP5QBA5NNHmLcA7zlnnUB8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hNDM0/ZmUzMzg3Mzk2OWVi/MTMwNzhkY2VlYWEz/NzljOC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>670</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A driver hits you on your e-bike. Four coverage layers may apply. Most e-bike riders don't know what they are, let alone the order to check them.</p><p>This is the audio version of the YouTube video "Hit by a Car on Your E-Bike? (I'm a Lawyer)" from The Bike Lawyer channel. If you want the full visual experience — on-screen statute citations, case law references, state-by-state graphics, and the coverage layer checklist — head to youtube.com/@thebikelawyerfl and search for the title above.</p><p>For listeners who prefer audio, this episode covers the correct order to check your coverage after an e-bike crash, why your state's e-bike classification doesn't automatically answer the insurance question, what to look for in your own policy, and what changes if the machine was modified beyond its legal class limits.</p><p>This is Part 2 of a two-part series. Part 1 covers the same coverage layers for traditional cyclists and is available now in this feed.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E-Bike Laws: 3 Restrictions Riders Get Wrong [Replay]</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>E-Bike Laws: 3 Restrictions Riders Get Wrong [Replay]</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15fae24d-dea3-4aaa-9a27-48431d2ef3f9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/55f2e86a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>🎧 Thursday Replay — this is the audio from a previously aired video on The Bike Lawyer YouTube channel. New episodes drop Tuesdays; archive episodes drop Thursdays.</p><p>📅 Originally published July 24, 2026. E-bike law moves fast — the Hawaii and New Jersey rules discussed here were brand new at the time of recording. Verify anything time-sensitive against current law before relying on it.</p><p>📺 Watch the full video version on YouTube @thebikelawyerfl</p><p>This one has on-screen graphics, state-by-state comparisons, and the class breakdowns that are easier to follow visually — if any of it is hard to track by ear, the video is the better format.</p><p>"You can't ride that on the road." "You need a license for that thing." "That's basically illegal unless you're 18."</p><p><br>If you ride an e-bike, you've heard some version of all four. Almost none of it is true where you ride — and believing the wrong one means you either stay off roads you're legally allowed to use, or you buy the wrong bike based on rules that don't apply to you.</p><p><br>In this episode, a Florida attorney breaks down:<br> • Where you can actually ride a legal e-bike — and the restrictions that are real (interstates, controlled-access highways, some local trails)<br> • The driver's license myth: only 2 states require a license or registration, and Florida isn't one of them<br> • The three-class system, what Class 1 / 2 / 3 actually mean, and why Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New Jersey don't follow it<br> • The one restriction that can genuinely bite you — and it has nothing to do with your state<br> • Helmet rules that change by state and by class</p><p>👉 Subscribe to The Bike Lawyer on YouTube for the full video library.</p><p>This episode is for general information only and is not legal advice. Laws change frequently — e-bike law in particular. Check the current statutes and local ordinances in your state and municipality, and consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction about your specific situation.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>🎧 Thursday Replay — this is the audio from a previously aired video on The Bike Lawyer YouTube channel. New episodes drop Tuesdays; archive episodes drop Thursdays.</p><p>📅 Originally published July 24, 2026. E-bike law moves fast — the Hawaii and New Jersey rules discussed here were brand new at the time of recording. Verify anything time-sensitive against current law before relying on it.</p><p>📺 Watch the full video version on YouTube @thebikelawyerfl</p><p>This one has on-screen graphics, state-by-state comparisons, and the class breakdowns that are easier to follow visually — if any of it is hard to track by ear, the video is the better format.</p><p>"You can't ride that on the road." "You need a license for that thing." "That's basically illegal unless you're 18."</p><p><br>If you ride an e-bike, you've heard some version of all four. Almost none of it is true where you ride — and believing the wrong one means you either stay off roads you're legally allowed to use, or you buy the wrong bike based on rules that don't apply to you.</p><p><br>In this episode, a Florida attorney breaks down:<br> • Where you can actually ride a legal e-bike — and the restrictions that are real (interstates, controlled-access highways, some local trails)<br> • The driver's license myth: only 2 states require a license or registration, and Florida isn't one of them<br> • The three-class system, what Class 1 / 2 / 3 actually mean, and why Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New Jersey don't follow it<br> • The one restriction that can genuinely bite you — and it has nothing to do with your state<br> • Helmet rules that change by state and by class</p><p>👉 Subscribe to The Bike Lawyer on YouTube for the full video library.</p><p>This episode is for general information only and is not legal advice. Laws change frequently — e-bike law in particular. Check the current statutes and local ordinances in your state and municipality, and consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction about your specific situation.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:59:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/55f2e86a/f5591f60.mp3" length="7848846" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTzqNxSe7BU">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/OfJ4vfUmtwmpnD0_R_n2dw8BP-PxcbmATb0fuUZiCVk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jN2Yz/MGM0OGMwODY0YTJk/NmFlZDYyYTc5NzZh/NmRjMS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>487</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>🎧 Thursday Replay — this is the audio from a previously aired video on The Bike Lawyer YouTube channel. New episodes drop Tuesdays; archive episodes drop Thursdays.</p><p>📅 Originally published July 24, 2026. E-bike law moves fast — the Hawaii and New Jersey rules discussed here were brand new at the time of recording. Verify anything time-sensitive against current law before relying on it.</p><p>📺 Watch the full video version on YouTube @thebikelawyerfl</p><p>This one has on-screen graphics, state-by-state comparisons, and the class breakdowns that are easier to follow visually — if any of it is hard to track by ear, the video is the better format.</p><p>"You can't ride that on the road." "You need a license for that thing." "That's basically illegal unless you're 18."</p><p><br>If you ride an e-bike, you've heard some version of all four. Almost none of it is true where you ride — and believing the wrong one means you either stay off roads you're legally allowed to use, or you buy the wrong bike based on rules that don't apply to you.</p><p><br>In this episode, a Florida attorney breaks down:<br> • Where you can actually ride a legal e-bike — and the restrictions that are real (interstates, controlled-access highways, some local trails)<br> • The driver's license myth: only 2 states require a license or registration, and Florida isn't one of them<br> • The three-class system, what Class 1 / 2 / 3 actually mean, and why Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New Jersey don't follow it<br> • The one restriction that can genuinely bite you — and it has nothing to do with your state<br> • Helmet rules that change by state and by class</p><p>👉 Subscribe to The Bike Lawyer on YouTube for the full video library.</p><p>This episode is for general information only and is not legal advice. Laws change frequently — e-bike law in particular. Check the current statutes and local ordinances in your state and municipality, and consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction about your specific situation.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Driver's Insurance Won't Be Enough</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>The Driver's Insurance Won't Be Enough</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">383adac5-ac0b-496d-ab58-a33f67302c76</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5a943237</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Most cyclists assume the driver's insurance covers everything after a crash. Roughly one in seven drivers is uninsured — and even when they carry coverage, minimum limits can be gone within hours of a serious injury.</p><p>This is the audio version of the YouTube video "The Driver's Insurance Won't Be Enough (I'm a Lawyer)" from The Bike Lawyer channel. If you want the full visual experience — on-screen case citations, statute references, and a printable six-item declarations-page checklist — head to youtube.com/@thebikelawyerfl and search for the title above.</p><p>For listeners who prefer audio, this episode covers everything in the video: where compensation actually comes from when the driver's policy isn't enough, how your own UM and UIM coverage may protect you on a bicycle, why Florida cyclists face a specific coverage gap most riders don't know about, and six things to check on your auto policy before your next ride.</p><p>What this episode covers:</p><ul><li>Why the driver's policy may not be enough, and in Florida, sometimes may not exist at all</li><li>How uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage can follow you onto a bicycle</li><li>Why who qualifies as an insured under the policy matters as much as whether UM exists</li><li>The Florida statute that directly addresses insureds injured while not in a vehicle</li><li>Court decisions where cyclists have pursued UM and UIM claims under their own auto policies</li><li>Six declarations-page checks, including limits, stacked vs. non-stacked, PIP, and the exact question to ask your agent</li><li>What happens if no one in your household has an auto policy at all</li></ul><p>This is Part 1 of a two-part series. Part 2 covers what changes when the bicycle is an e-bike.</p><p>Subscribe / @thebikelawyerfl / Palaidis Law, PA / Fort Lauderdale, FL / <br>DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Most cyclists assume the driver's insurance covers everything after a crash. Roughly one in seven drivers is uninsured — and even when they carry coverage, minimum limits can be gone within hours of a serious injury.</p><p>This is the audio version of the YouTube video "The Driver's Insurance Won't Be Enough (I'm a Lawyer)" from The Bike Lawyer channel. If you want the full visual experience — on-screen case citations, statute references, and a printable six-item declarations-page checklist — head to youtube.com/@thebikelawyerfl and search for the title above.</p><p>For listeners who prefer audio, this episode covers everything in the video: where compensation actually comes from when the driver's policy isn't enough, how your own UM and UIM coverage may protect you on a bicycle, why Florida cyclists face a specific coverage gap most riders don't know about, and six things to check on your auto policy before your next ride.</p><p>What this episode covers:</p><ul><li>Why the driver's policy may not be enough, and in Florida, sometimes may not exist at all</li><li>How uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage can follow you onto a bicycle</li><li>Why who qualifies as an insured under the policy matters as much as whether UM exists</li><li>The Florida statute that directly addresses insureds injured while not in a vehicle</li><li>Court decisions where cyclists have pursued UM and UIM claims under their own auto policies</li><li>Six declarations-page checks, including limits, stacked vs. non-stacked, PIP, and the exact question to ask your agent</li><li>What happens if no one in your household has an auto policy at all</li></ul><p>This is Part 1 of a two-part series. Part 2 covers what changes when the bicycle is an e-bike.</p><p>Subscribe / @thebikelawyerfl / Palaidis Law, PA / Fort Lauderdale, FL / <br>DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:56:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5a943237/7d87f6a8.mp3" length="9801810" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/j0EjY8ECr9mP6luY856tslH6nO-t2ajn4rhcKqbNHdc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80M2Iz/MDYxODUzZTllNDcw/ZTM5YmU4ZTA0Mjhk/Yjk1Mi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>610</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Most cyclists assume the driver's insurance covers everything after a crash. Roughly one in seven drivers is uninsured — and even when they carry coverage, minimum limits can be gone within hours of a serious injury.</p><p>This is the audio version of the YouTube video "The Driver's Insurance Won't Be Enough (I'm a Lawyer)" from The Bike Lawyer channel. If you want the full visual experience — on-screen case citations, statute references, and a printable six-item declarations-page checklist — head to youtube.com/@thebikelawyerfl and search for the title above.</p><p>For listeners who prefer audio, this episode covers everything in the video: where compensation actually comes from when the driver's policy isn't enough, how your own UM and UIM coverage may protect you on a bicycle, why Florida cyclists face a specific coverage gap most riders don't know about, and six things to check on your auto policy before your next ride.</p><p>What this episode covers:</p><ul><li>Why the driver's policy may not be enough, and in Florida, sometimes may not exist at all</li><li>How uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage can follow you onto a bicycle</li><li>Why who qualifies as an insured under the policy matters as much as whether UM exists</li><li>The Florida statute that directly addresses insureds injured while not in a vehicle</li><li>Court decisions where cyclists have pursued UM and UIM claims under their own auto policies</li><li>Six declarations-page checks, including limits, stacked vs. non-stacked, PIP, and the exact question to ask your agent</li><li>What happens if no one in your household has an auto policy at all</li></ul><p>This is Part 1 of a two-part series. Part 2 covers what changes when the bicycle is an e-bike.</p><p>Subscribe / @thebikelawyerfl / Palaidis Law, PA / Fort Lauderdale, FL / <br>DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Drivers Hit Cyclists They Clearly See</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Drivers Hit Cyclists They Clearly See</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6be29999-fafe-4b62-8ac8-cc5a967e66c7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f00c8857</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A driver looks right at a cyclist on a clear, sunny day, and still drifts into them. How does that happen? Part of the answer is a human-factors problem most drivers have never been trained on: target fixation.</p><p>In this episode, I break down how your hands tend to follow your eyes, why "I saw the cyclist" is not the same as safely avoiding one, and the one habit that helps prevent the crash, whether you are behind the wheel or on two wheels. I also explain why, in much of this country, cyclists are legally allowed to take the lane, and why that law makes more sense once you understand the problem.</p><p>By the end, you will have a single shift in how you use your eyes, your steering, and your road position that can keep you out of a crash.</p><p>Palaidis Law, PA</p><p>Fort Lauderdale, FL</p><p>call: 954-828-0848</p><p>email: hello@palaidislaw.com </p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER</p><p>This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A driver looks right at a cyclist on a clear, sunny day, and still drifts into them. How does that happen? Part of the answer is a human-factors problem most drivers have never been trained on: target fixation.</p><p>In this episode, I break down how your hands tend to follow your eyes, why "I saw the cyclist" is not the same as safely avoiding one, and the one habit that helps prevent the crash, whether you are behind the wheel or on two wheels. I also explain why, in much of this country, cyclists are legally allowed to take the lane, and why that law makes more sense once you understand the problem.</p><p>By the end, you will have a single shift in how you use your eyes, your steering, and your road position that can keep you out of a crash.</p><p>Palaidis Law, PA</p><p>Fort Lauderdale, FL</p><p>call: 954-828-0848</p><p>email: hello@palaidislaw.com </p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER</p><p>This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:35:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George C. Palaidis</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f00c8857/2cca7368.mp3" length="7900649" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9etdPVptBo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>George C. Palaidis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/YYfB9JAsJMQUZaPmWrVn_7Fbzp9ju43YOaTE9lc7s5k/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hNGEy/ODNlYTNjNGFmNTcy/ZDAyMzFlMzQ0ZDA1/MTRkYS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>491</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A driver looks right at a cyclist on a clear, sunny day, and still drifts into them. How does that happen? Part of the answer is a human-factors problem most drivers have never been trained on: target fixation.</p><p>In this episode, I break down how your hands tend to follow your eyes, why "I saw the cyclist" is not the same as safely avoiding one, and the one habit that helps prevent the crash, whether you are behind the wheel or on two wheels. I also explain why, in much of this country, cyclists are legally allowed to take the lane, and why that law makes more sense once you understand the problem.</p><p>By the end, you will have a single shift in how you use your eyes, your steering, and your road position that can keep you out of a crash.</p><p>Palaidis Law, PA</p><p>Fort Lauderdale, FL</p><p>call: 954-828-0848</p><p>email: hello@palaidislaw.com </p><p><br></p><p>DISCLAIMER</p><p>This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Legal, bicycle, safety, cycling, e-bikes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
