The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community Transistor (https://transistor.fm) https://feeds.transistor.fm/the-bdbf-podcast-news-and-insights-for-the-employment-law-community The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community is the authoritative podcast for the latest developments, expert analysis, and practical guidance within the constantly evolving field of employment law. Each episode presents in-depth discussions with prominent professionals, examining complex legal precedents, legislative amendments, and emerging trends that affect employers, employees, and legal practitioners. Whether seeking to remain current on recent judicial decisions, comprehend the practical ramifications of new regulations, or acquire actionable strategies for managing workplace issues, our podcast provides substantive content specifically designed for the employment law community. Subscribe to remain informed and equip yourself with the essential knowledge required in today’s dynamic legal environment. Copyright © Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP ea60fd41-038e-5791-b360-5889ff82594b no en Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:00:09 +0100 Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:01:59 +0100 https://www.bdbf.co.uk https://img.transistorcdn.com/YmRW9aGRGJHSJYizEL8XEgOOC9q1VDxL_1oHCkq8c98/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hZTEy/YjYzMTA1ZDI1YTk1/ZDAxMGViMzZkODQz/ZDFiNi5qcGVn.jpg The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community https://www.bdbf.co.uk episodic BDBF LLP The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community is the authoritative podcast for the latest developments, expert analysis, and practical guidance within the constantly evolving field of employment law. Each episode presents in-depth discussions with prominent professionals, examining complex legal precedents, legislative amendments, and emerging trends that affect employers, employees, and legal practitioners. Whether seeking to remain current on recent judicial decisions, comprehend the practical ramifications of new regulations, or acquire actionable strategies for managing workplace issues, our podcast provides substantive content specifically designed for the employment law community. Subscribe to remain informed and equip yourself with the essential knowledge required in today’s dynamic legal environment. The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community is the authoritative podcast for the latest developments, expert analysis, and practical guidance within the constantly evolving field of employment law. Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP info@podshoponline.co.uk No No Osipov in the firing line | Rice v Wicked Vision & The Whistleblowing Loophole 9 9 Osipov in the firing line | Rice v Wicked Vision & The Whistleblowing Loophole full 9cec72ed-616c-42be-b966-5a18450e382a https://share.transistor.fm/s/a760c037 How long can whistleblowers continue to claim dismissal as a "detriment" against an individual colleague?


Whistleblowing law in the UK is at a pivotal crossroads. In May this year, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision, in which the future of Timis v Osipov is in the firing line.  


In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Amanda Steadman is joined by Bruce Carr KC and Managing Partner Gareth Brahams who both acted for Mr Osipov, to dive into what the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision means for personal liability in the workplace.


Together, they unpick the "detriment of dismissal" loophole, tracking the legacy of Timis v Osipov and examining the contentious boundary between an "instruction to dismiss" and the "act of dismissal." 


Listeners will also gain insights into:

  • How the Timis v Osipov precedent continues to influence detriment claims.
  • The statutory tension between Section 47B detriment and Part X unfair dismissal.
  • Balancing the strict wording of the law with the need to protect whistleblowers.
  • What the Rice decision means for the future of high-value whistleblowing claims.
  • Speculation on a Supreme Court appeal and the long-term implications for employment law.

Drawing on their extensive experience, this episode offers essential strategic insights for employment lawyers and HR leaders navigating these shifting legal waters.

Cases discussed:

BDBF’s briefing on Wicked Vision can be accessed here: https://www.bdbf.co.uk/employers-continue-to-be-vicariously-liable-for-detriment-of-dismissal-claims-brought-by-employee-whistleblowers-for-now-at-least/

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

]]> How long can whistleblowers continue to claim dismissal as a "detriment" against an individual colleague?


Whistleblowing law in the UK is at a pivotal crossroads. In May this year, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision, in which the future of Timis v Osipov is in the firing line.  


In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Amanda Steadman is joined by Bruce Carr KC and Managing Partner Gareth Brahams who both acted for Mr Osipov, to dive into what the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision means for personal liability in the workplace.


Together, they unpick the "detriment of dismissal" loophole, tracking the legacy of Timis v Osipov and examining the contentious boundary between an "instruction to dismiss" and the "act of dismissal." 


Listeners will also gain insights into:

  • How the Timis v Osipov precedent continues to influence detriment claims.
  • The statutory tension between Section 47B detriment and Part X unfair dismissal.
  • Balancing the strict wording of the law with the need to protect whistleblowers.
  • What the Rice decision means for the future of high-value whistleblowing claims.
  • Speculation on a Supreme Court appeal and the long-term implications for employment law.

Drawing on their extensive experience, this episode offers essential strategic insights for employment lawyers and HR leaders navigating these shifting legal waters.

Cases discussed:

BDBF’s briefing on Wicked Vision can be accessed here: https://www.bdbf.co.uk/employers-continue-to-be-vicariously-liable-for-detriment-of-dismissal-claims-brought-by-employee-whistleblowers-for-now-at-least/

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

]]> Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:00:00 +0100 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 2221 How long can whistleblowers continue to claim dismissal as a "detriment" against an individual colleague?


Whistleblowing law in the UK is at a pivotal crossroads. In May this year, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision, in which the future of Timis v Osipov is in the firing line.  


In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Amanda Steadman is joined by Bruce Carr KC and Managing Partner Gareth Brahams who both acted for Mr Osipov, to dive into what the appeal in Rice v Wicked Vision means for personal liability in the workplace.


Together, they unpick the "detriment of dismissal" loophole, tracking the legacy of Timis v Osipov and examining the contentious boundary between an "instruction to dismiss" and the "act of dismissal." 


Listeners will also gain insights into:

  • How the Timis v Osipov precedent continues to influence detriment claims.
  • The statutory tension between Section 47B detriment and Part X unfair dismissal.
  • Balancing the strict wording of the law with the need to protect whistleblowers.
  • What the Rice decision means for the future of high-value whistleblowing claims.
  • Speculation on a Supreme Court appeal and the long-term implications for employment law.

Drawing on their extensive experience, this episode offers essential strategic insights for employment lawyers and HR leaders navigating these shifting legal waters.

Cases discussed:

BDBF’s briefing on Wicked Vision can be accessed here: https://www.bdbf.co.uk/employers-continue-to-be-vicariously-liable-for-detriment-of-dismissal-claims-brought-by-employee-whistleblowers-for-now-at-least/

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

]]> BDBF Podcast, employment law, whistleblowing law, detriment claims, dismissal, Court of Appeal, November 2025 decision, Employment Rights Act 1996, section 47B, Timis and Sage v Osipov, Rice and Wicked Vision, Barton Terns Development Limited, Treadwell, legal intricacies, statutory provisions, unfair dismissal claims, vicarious liability, employer responsibility, protected disclosures, employment tribunal, legal framework, Osipov case, coworker liability, legal challenges, Supreme Court, statutory interpretation, discrimination law, legal precedent, employment law community, employee rights, whistleblower protections, legal landscape, judicial interpretation, statutory construction, workplace retaliation, legal uncertainty, procedural history, public policy considerations. No Tailor Wasn’t Hemmed In By His Long Non-Compete | Tom James UK Ltd v Max Potter 8 8 Tailor Wasn’t Hemmed In By His Long Non-Compete | Tom James UK Ltd v Max Potter full c99bafe0-2ea4-4d69-9ee1-d3e56d5e5a05 https://share.transistor.fm/s/1c859bf9
Was the 12-Month Non-Compete Agreement Enforceable? Analysing the High Court Ruling in Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter.

In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin and Jamie Barton explore the headline employment law dispute Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter, focusing on the enforceability of non-compete clauses, restrictive covenants and the risks of overly restrictive post-termination restraints.


The episode follows Max Potter, a mid-level salesperson who found himself at the centre of a legal dispute after his employer attempted to enforce a 12-month non-compete clause following his resignation. 


Tom and Jamie walk listeners through the events leading up to the court case, illustrating how aggressive restrictive covenants can backfire and the real-world consequences for both employers and employees.


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • How non-compete clauses and restrictive covenants work in practice
  • The impact of harsh disciplinary measures on the enforceability
  • The High Court’s scrutiny of the 12-month non-compete clause
  • Legal and reputational risks for businesses enforcing overly broad post-termination restrictions
  • Practical steps employers and HR teams can take to protect their interests while remaining fair and compliant


Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, business leaders, and anyone managing employee departures or restrictive covenants.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


]]>
Was the 12-Month Non-Compete Agreement Enforceable? Analysing the High Court Ruling in Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter.

In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin and Jamie Barton explore the headline employment law dispute Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter, focusing on the enforceability of non-compete clauses, restrictive covenants and the risks of overly restrictive post-termination restraints.


The episode follows Max Potter, a mid-level salesperson who found himself at the centre of a legal dispute after his employer attempted to enforce a 12-month non-compete clause following his resignation. 


Tom and Jamie walk listeners through the events leading up to the court case, illustrating how aggressive restrictive covenants can backfire and the real-world consequences for both employers and employees.


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • How non-compete clauses and restrictive covenants work in practice
  • The impact of harsh disciplinary measures on the enforceability
  • The High Court’s scrutiny of the 12-month non-compete clause
  • Legal and reputational risks for businesses enforcing overly broad post-termination restrictions
  • Practical steps employers and HR teams can take to protect their interests while remaining fair and compliant


Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, business leaders, and anyone managing employee departures or restrictive covenants.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


]]> Mon, 23 Mar 2026 16:00:00 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 1745
Was the 12-Month Non-Compete Agreement Enforceable? Analysing the High Court Ruling in Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter.

In this episode of the BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin and Jamie Barton explore the headline employment law dispute Tom James UK Limited v Max Potter, focusing on the enforceability of non-compete clauses, restrictive covenants and the risks of overly restrictive post-termination restraints.


The episode follows Max Potter, a mid-level salesperson who found himself at the centre of a legal dispute after his employer attempted to enforce a 12-month non-compete clause following his resignation. 


Tom and Jamie walk listeners through the events leading up to the court case, illustrating how aggressive restrictive covenants can backfire and the real-world consequences for both employers and employees.


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • How non-compete clauses and restrictive covenants work in practice
  • The impact of harsh disciplinary measures on the enforceability
  • The High Court’s scrutiny of the 12-month non-compete clause
  • Legal and reputational risks for businesses enforcing overly broad post-termination restrictions
  • Practical steps employers and HR teams can take to protect their interests while remaining fair and compliant


Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, business leaders, and anyone managing employee departures or restrictive covenants.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


]]> BDBF Podcast, employment law, post-termination restrictions, non-compete clause, Tom James UK Limited, Max Potter, legal case, restrictive covenants, employment contracts, disciplinary actions, enforceability, breaches of contract, interim relief, customer relationships, confidentiality, business interests, judicial findings, litigation, human aspect, crowdfunding, legal fees, Baker McKenzie, Constantine Law, King’s Bench Division, employer treatment, employee rights, legal proceedings, workplace counseling, customer goodwill, litigation costs, non-solicitation restrictions, corporate devices, client management systems, legal disputes, high court litigation, employer conduct. No Legal Risks of “Up or Out” | Pal v Accenture UK Limited 7 7 Legal Risks of “Up or Out” | Pal v Accenture UK Limited full 05c6a6b8-b78c-4dd7-bc5b-bd968707d521 https://share.transistor.fm/s/7a115ae5 Unfair Dismissal, Polkey Deductions and Performance Management: Lessons from Pal v Accenture UK Limited

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, Samantha Prosser and James Hockley analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Pal v Accenture UK Limited – and what the ruling means for employers and claimants.

Ms Pal, a 10-year Accenture manager, was dismissed in 2019 for allegedly not being “promotion-ready” under the firm’s controversial “up or out” model – all while managing significant symptoms of endometriosis.

Samantha and James unpack the key issues this case raises around disability discrimination, procedural fairness and the application of Polkey reductions to compensation.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The factual background to Pal v Accenture UK Limited
  • The legal issues raised by the “up or out” performance management model
  • The tribunal’s errors in assessing disability discrimination and procedural fairness under the Equality Act
  • The EAT’s guidance on the application of Polkey deductions
  • Practical lessons for employers on maintaining fair dismissal procedures 

With significant changes to unfair dismissal law and compensation caps expected from 2027, this episode offers timely guidance for HR professionals, employment lawyers and business leaders navigating performance management and dismissal risk.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/

Sign up to our newsletter:
www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Samantha Prosser
https://www.linkedin.com/in/samanthacprosser/
Partner at BDBF, Samantha has extensive litigation experience in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. She specialises in whistleblowing and sex and disability discrimination claims, with particular expertise advising Consultants in the NHS and private practice.

James Hockley
https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-hockley-9060a685/
Senior Associate at BDBF, James advises both individuals and employers across Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, High Court, and Court of Appeal proceedings. His practice focuses on discrimination, whistleblowing, unfair dismissal, employee competition, investigations, disciplinary and grievance matters, and negotiated exits.

]]> Unfair Dismissal, Polkey Deductions and Performance Management: Lessons from Pal v Accenture UK Limited

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, Samantha Prosser and James Hockley analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Pal v Accenture UK Limited – and what the ruling means for employers and claimants.

Ms Pal, a 10-year Accenture manager, was dismissed in 2019 for allegedly not being “promotion-ready” under the firm’s controversial “up or out” model – all while managing significant symptoms of endometriosis.

Samantha and James unpack the key issues this case raises around disability discrimination, procedural fairness and the application of Polkey reductions to compensation.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The factual background to Pal v Accenture UK Limited
  • The legal issues raised by the “up or out” performance management model
  • The tribunal’s errors in assessing disability discrimination and procedural fairness under the Equality Act
  • The EAT’s guidance on the application of Polkey deductions
  • Practical lessons for employers on maintaining fair dismissal procedures 

With significant changes to unfair dismissal law and compensation caps expected from 2027, this episode offers timely guidance for HR professionals, employment lawyers and business leaders navigating performance management and dismissal risk.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/

Sign up to our newsletter:
www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Samantha Prosser
https://www.linkedin.com/in/samanthacprosser/
Partner at BDBF, Samantha has extensive litigation experience in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. She specialises in whistleblowing and sex and disability discrimination claims, with particular expertise advising Consultants in the NHS and private practice.

James Hockley
https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-hockley-9060a685/
Senior Associate at BDBF, James advises both individuals and employers across Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, High Court, and Court of Appeal proceedings. His practice focuses on discrimination, whistleblowing, unfair dismissal, employee competition, investigations, disciplinary and grievance matters, and negotiated exits.

]]> Mon, 09 Mar 2026 16:00:00 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 1841 Unfair Dismissal, Polkey Deductions and Performance Management: Lessons from Pal v Accenture UK Limited

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, Samantha Prosser and James Hockley analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Pal v Accenture UK Limited – and what the ruling means for employers and claimants.

Ms Pal, a 10-year Accenture manager, was dismissed in 2019 for allegedly not being “promotion-ready” under the firm’s controversial “up or out” model – all while managing significant symptoms of endometriosis.

Samantha and James unpack the key issues this case raises around disability discrimination, procedural fairness and the application of Polkey reductions to compensation.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The factual background to Pal v Accenture UK Limited
  • The legal issues raised by the “up or out” performance management model
  • The tribunal’s errors in assessing disability discrimination and procedural fairness under the Equality Act
  • The EAT’s guidance on the application of Polkey deductions
  • Practical lessons for employers on maintaining fair dismissal procedures 

With significant changes to unfair dismissal law and compensation caps expected from 2027, this episode offers timely guidance for HR professionals, employment lawyers and business leaders navigating performance management and dismissal risk.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/

Sign up to our newsletter:
www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Samantha Prosser
https://www.linkedin.com/in/samanthacprosser/
Partner at BDBF, Samantha has extensive litigation experience in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. She specialises in whistleblowing and sex and disability discrimination claims, with particular expertise advising Consultants in the NHS and private practice.

James Hockley
https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-hockley-9060a685/
Senior Associate at BDBF, James advises both individuals and employers across Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, High Court, and Court of Appeal proceedings. His practice focuses on discrimination, whistleblowing, unfair dismissal, employee competition, investigations, disciplinary and grievance matters, and negotiated exits.

]]> Employment Law, Employment Appeal Tribunal, EAT, Miss Pal, Accenture UK Limited, Unfair Dismissal, Polkey Deduction, Disability Discrimination, Endometriosis, Employment Rights Act 2025, Compensation Cap, Performance Model, "Up or Out" Policy, Procedural Fairness, Tribunal Findings, Counterfactuals, Capability Dismissals, Performance Improvement Plan, Credibility Issues, Medical Evidence, Discrimination Arising from Disability, Proportionality Assessment, Remission of Case, Employment Tribunal, Legal Definition of Disability, Employment Lawyers, Employer Responsibilities, Procedural Failings, Employee Rights, Performance Management Process, Employment Judges, Workplace Policies, Legal Insights, Podcast, Employment Law Community. No Reynolds v Abel Estate Agents Limited | Key Guidance on Detriment Claims and Early Conciliation 6 6 Reynolds v Abel Estate Agents Limited | Key Guidance on Detriment Claims and Early Conciliation full 95c61ae7-7095-401f-91fa-176761ea3ee5 https://share.transistor.fm/s/2b42361e When can a detriment claim bypass ACAS early conciliation? The Court of Appeal sets the rules in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited. 


In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by Knowledge Lawyer Rose Lim to unpack the Court of Appeal’s decision in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited and its implications for ACAS early conciliation requirements.


Tom and Rose break down the statutory framework behind early conciliation and the Court’s clarification of a critical distinction: bringing a new claim versus amending an existing one. 


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The facts and procedural history of Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited
  • When early conciliation operates as a jurisdictional bar
  • How interim relief interacts with ACAS requirements
  • The Court of Appeal’s approach to amendments and claim validity
  • The strategic implications for claimants, respondents and practitioners


Packed with practical guidance and procedural insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals and anyone navigating tribunal claims under the early conciliation regime.


The podcast discusses the cases of:

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Clark & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 386


Pryce v Baxterstorey Limited [2022] EAT 61

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


Rose Lim

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rose-l-40a345b0/


Rosie is a knowledge lawyer at BDBF, maintaining up-to-date knowledge of developments in employment law. She supports the delivery of first-class training and know-how for both the firm and its clients.

]]> When can a detriment claim bypass ACAS early conciliation? The Court of Appeal sets the rules in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited. 


In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by Knowledge Lawyer Rose Lim to unpack the Court of Appeal’s decision in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited and its implications for ACAS early conciliation requirements.


Tom and Rose break down the statutory framework behind early conciliation and the Court’s clarification of a critical distinction: bringing a new claim versus amending an existing one. 


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The facts and procedural history of Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited
  • When early conciliation operates as a jurisdictional bar
  • How interim relief interacts with ACAS requirements
  • The Court of Appeal’s approach to amendments and claim validity
  • The strategic implications for claimants, respondents and practitioners


Packed with practical guidance and procedural insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals and anyone navigating tribunal claims under the early conciliation regime.


The podcast discusses the cases of:

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Clark & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 386


Pryce v Baxterstorey Limited [2022] EAT 61

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


Rose Lim

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rose-l-40a345b0/


Rosie is a knowledge lawyer at BDBF, maintaining up-to-date knowledge of developments in employment law. She supports the delivery of first-class training and know-how for both the firm and its clients.

]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2026 16:00:00 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 860 When can a detriment claim bypass ACAS early conciliation? The Court of Appeal sets the rules in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited. 


In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by Knowledge Lawyer Rose Lim to unpack the Court of Appeal’s decision in Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited and its implications for ACAS early conciliation requirements.


Tom and Rose break down the statutory framework behind early conciliation and the Court’s clarification of a critical distinction: bringing a new claim versus amending an existing one. 


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The facts and procedural history of Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Limited
  • When early conciliation operates as a jurisdictional bar
  • How interim relief interacts with ACAS requirements
  • The Court of Appeal’s approach to amendments and claim validity
  • The strategic implications for claimants, respondents and practitioners


Packed with practical guidance and procedural insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals and anyone navigating tribunal claims under the early conciliation regime.


The podcast discusses the cases of:

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Clark & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 386


Pryce v Baxterstorey Limited [2022] EAT 61

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


Rose Lim

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rose-l-40a345b0/


Rosie is a knowledge lawyer at BDBF, maintaining up-to-date knowledge of developments in employment law. She supports the delivery of first-class training and know-how for both the firm and its clients.

]]> No A New Era for Unfair Dismissal | The Employment Rights Act Reforms Explained 5 5 A New Era for Unfair Dismissal | The Employment Rights Act Reforms Explained full 2fe19907-a9cc-44f8-925e-f867f331aaf8 https://share.transistor.fm/s/0c195f64 How Will the New Unfair Dismissal Regime Transform Employment Tribunal Claims for Employers and Employees?

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, partners Claire Dawson and Paula Chan examine the sweeping reforms to unfair dismissal law coming into force on 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act.

Moving beyond the headlines, Claire and Paula unpack how shorter qualifying periods and uncapped compensation will affect unfair dismissal litigation, and what these changes mean in practice for the employment tribunal system.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • How the new unfair dismissal framework will operate 
  • The anticipated rise in employment tribunal claims 
  • The implications of removing the unfair dismissal compensation cap
  • How employers’ settlement strategies may need to adapt
  • The broader consequences for the tribunal system and public sector employers\


As the UK employment law landscape prepares for its most substantial transformation in decades, this episode is essential listening for employers, HR professionals and employment lawyers navigating a new and uncertain era in unfair dismissal law.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Guest Info

Claire Dawson

linkedin.com/in/claire-dawson/


Recognised leader in the field of employment law. Ranked in Band 1 as a leading individual for Employment: Senior Executive in Chambers UK 2025 and a Leading Partner for Employment: Senior Executives in Legal 500 UK 2026


Paula Chan

linkedin.com/in/paulachan/


Ranked Band 1 by Chambers 2026 for Employment: Senior Executives and recognised as a leading partner by Legal 500 2026, specialist employment lawyer Paula Chan advises individuals, partners and employers. She has experience in high-profile employee and partner exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract and discrimination.

]]> How Will the New Unfair Dismissal Regime Transform Employment Tribunal Claims for Employers and Employees?

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, partners Claire Dawson and Paula Chan examine the sweeping reforms to unfair dismissal law coming into force on 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act.

Moving beyond the headlines, Claire and Paula unpack how shorter qualifying periods and uncapped compensation will affect unfair dismissal litigation, and what these changes mean in practice for the employment tribunal system.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • How the new unfair dismissal framework will operate 
  • The anticipated rise in employment tribunal claims 
  • The implications of removing the unfair dismissal compensation cap
  • How employers’ settlement strategies may need to adapt
  • The broader consequences for the tribunal system and public sector employers\


As the UK employment law landscape prepares for its most substantial transformation in decades, this episode is essential listening for employers, HR professionals and employment lawyers navigating a new and uncertain era in unfair dismissal law.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Guest Info

Claire Dawson

linkedin.com/in/claire-dawson/


Recognised leader in the field of employment law. Ranked in Band 1 as a leading individual for Employment: Senior Executive in Chambers UK 2025 and a Leading Partner for Employment: Senior Executives in Legal 500 UK 2026


Paula Chan

linkedin.com/in/paulachan/


Ranked Band 1 by Chambers 2026 for Employment: Senior Executives and recognised as a leading partner by Legal 500 2026, specialist employment lawyer Paula Chan advises individuals, partners and employers. She has experience in high-profile employee and partner exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract and discrimination.

]]> Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:00:00 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 2055 How Will the New Unfair Dismissal Regime Transform Employment Tribunal Claims for Employers and Employees?

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, partners Claire Dawson and Paula Chan examine the sweeping reforms to unfair dismissal law coming into force on 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act.

Moving beyond the headlines, Claire and Paula unpack how shorter qualifying periods and uncapped compensation will affect unfair dismissal litigation, and what these changes mean in practice for the employment tribunal system.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • How the new unfair dismissal framework will operate 
  • The anticipated rise in employment tribunal claims 
  • The implications of removing the unfair dismissal compensation cap
  • How employers’ settlement strategies may need to adapt
  • The broader consequences for the tribunal system and public sector employers\


As the UK employment law landscape prepares for its most substantial transformation in decades, this episode is essential listening for employers, HR professionals and employment lawyers navigating a new and uncertain era in unfair dismissal law.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF
Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive into practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.ukPhone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
Sign up to our newsletter:www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Guest Info

Claire Dawson

linkedin.com/in/claire-dawson/


Recognised leader in the field of employment law. Ranked in Band 1 as a leading individual for Employment: Senior Executive in Chambers UK 2025 and a Leading Partner for Employment: Senior Executives in Legal 500 UK 2026


Paula Chan

linkedin.com/in/paulachan/


Ranked Band 1 by Chambers 2026 for Employment: Senior Executives and recognised as a leading partner by Legal 500 2026, specialist employment lawyer Paula Chan advises individuals, partners and employers. She has experience in high-profile employee and partner exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract and discrimination.

]]> BDBF Podcast, employment law, Court of Appeal, Reynolds case, Abel Estate Agent Limited, ACAS early conciliation, employment tribunals, statutory dispute resolution, Sainsbury’s Supermarkets v Clark, Pryce v Baxter Story, jurisdictional bars, amendments to claims, unfair dismissal, whistleblower claims, interim relief, tribunal rules, employment tribunals act 1996, legal implications, compliance procedures, litigants in person, jurisdictional non-compliance, substantive non-compliance, evidential non-compliance, dismissal of claims, amendments without early conciliation, legal discretion, employment litigation, conflict in authorities, legal insights, employment law community, case management discretion. No Litigating Informal Promises | The Dixon v GlobalData Plc Decision 4 4 Litigating Informal Promises | The Dixon v GlobalData Plc Decision full 6c22ba02-9b16-47bb-9a91-da911cab11c0 https://share.transistor.fm/s/55db57ad The Consequences of Informal Promises in Share Option Agreements: What Dixon v GlobalData Plc Means in Practice…


In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by partner Paula Chan to unpack the High Court’s decision in Dixon v GlobalData Plc and its implications for informal promises made about share option agreements.


Tom and Paula examine how verbal assurances about share options led to complex litigation after the employee’s departure, and what the decision means for employers and employees involved in equity-based reward structures.


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The factual background to the Dixon v GlobalData Plc dispute
  • How proprietary estoppel can arise in share option agreement cases
  • The risks created by informal or poorly documented equity promises
  • The court’s reasoning and approach
  • Practical steps to reduce disputes in share plan and incentive arrangements
  • The importance of clear drafting and legal advice in employment negotiations


Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, and business leaders dealing with share option agreements and executive incentive plans.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


Paula Chan

https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulachan/


Specialist employment lawyer advising senior executives, partners, and employers, with experience in high-profile employee exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract, and workplace discrimination.

]]> The Consequences of Informal Promises in Share Option Agreements: What Dixon v GlobalData Plc Means in Practice…


In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by partner Paula Chan to unpack the High Court’s decision in Dixon v GlobalData Plc and its implications for informal promises made about share option agreements.


Tom and Paula examine how verbal assurances about share options led to complex litigation after the employee’s departure, and what the decision means for employers and employees involved in equity-based reward structures.


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The factual background to the Dixon v GlobalData Plc dispute
  • How proprietary estoppel can arise in share option agreement cases
  • The risks created by informal or poorly documented equity promises
  • The court’s reasoning and approach
  • Practical steps to reduce disputes in share plan and incentive arrangements
  • The importance of clear drafting and legal advice in employment negotiations


Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, and business leaders dealing with share option agreements and executive incentive plans.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


Paula Chan

https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulachan/


Specialist employment lawyer advising senior executives, partners, and employers, with experience in high-profile employee exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract, and workplace discrimination.

]]> Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:00:00 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 1165 The Consequences of Informal Promises in Share Option Agreements: What Dixon v GlobalData Plc Means in Practice…


In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by partner Paula Chan to unpack the High Court’s decision in Dixon v GlobalData Plc and its implications for informal promises made about share option agreements.


Tom and Paula examine how verbal assurances about share options led to complex litigation after the employee’s departure, and what the decision means for employers and employees involved in equity-based reward structures.


Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The factual background to the Dixon v GlobalData Plc dispute
  • How proprietary estoppel can arise in share option agreement cases
  • The risks created by informal or poorly documented equity promises
  • The court’s reasoning and approach
  • Practical steps to reduce disputes in share plan and incentive arrangements
  • The importance of clear drafting and legal advice in employment negotiations


Packed with strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment lawyers, HR professionals, and business leaders dealing with share option agreements and executive incentive plans.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF


Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.


For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.


We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk 


Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk

Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350


Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/

Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/


Sign up to our newsletter:

www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/


Paula Chan

https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulachan/


Specialist employment lawyer advising senior executives, partners, and employers, with experience in high-profile employee exits and significant disputes involving whistleblowing, breach of contract, and workplace discrimination.

]]> employment law, law podcast, Tom McLaughlin, Paula Chan, High Court decision, Dixon and GlobalData Plc, share options, employee promises, proprietary estoppel, legal analysis, law community, settlement agreement, market research firm, employee rights, termination, performance targets, discretion under Rule 71, specific performance, damages, equitable principles, assurance, reasonable reliance, substantial detriment, exclusion clauses, medical field clause, binding obligations, share plan rules, post-termination benefits, legal implications, employer responsibilities, employee advice, trust in employment, informal promises, legal disputes, BDBF podcast, employment disputes, legal remedies. No Gareth Brahams: 30 Years in Employment Law | Insights from a Founding Partner 3 3 Gareth Brahams: 30 Years in Employment Law | Insights from a Founding Partner full fcbfc13b-439e-4eeb-99cf-2a8d94c17056 https://share.transistor.fm/s/5196da97 In a special episode of The BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin sits down with BDBF founding partner Gareth Brahams to mark the firm’s 13th anniversary and Gareth’s 30-year career in employment law.

Departing from the usual legal updates, the conversation offers a rich, reflective look at Gareth’s career journey, the evolution of the profession, and the landmark cases and trends that have shaped the field.

The episode traces Gareth’s early career, from his first role in 1995 and the limited scope of employment law at the time, through his experiences in tribunal advocacy, senior executive cases, and the founding of BDBF. Along the way, Gareth shares candid stories about technological shifts, the rise of standalone employment practices, law firm mergers, and his most memorable cases – including whistleblowing, discrimination, bonus litigation, and restrictive covenants.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The early state of employment law and tribunal work in the 1990s
  • The impact of technology and client expectations on legal practice
  • Key mergers and consolidation in the legal sector
  • Shifts in case trends, legislation, and workplace culture over 30 years
  • Mentorship, professional values, and advice Gareth would give his younger self
  • How AI and technological advances are shaping the future of employment law



Packed full of practical insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law practitioners and anyone interested in the human side of a long and distinguished legal career.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Tom McLaughlin
www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom
Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves.

Gareth Brahams

linkedin.com/in/garethbrahams

Employment lawyer who has fought and won some of the biggest cases in whistleblowing, discrimination, restrictive covenants and stress at work claims.


]]> In a special episode of The BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin sits down with BDBF founding partner Gareth Brahams to mark the firm’s 13th anniversary and Gareth’s 30-year career in employment law.

Departing from the usual legal updates, the conversation offers a rich, reflective look at Gareth’s career journey, the evolution of the profession, and the landmark cases and trends that have shaped the field.

The episode traces Gareth’s early career, from his first role in 1995 and the limited scope of employment law at the time, through his experiences in tribunal advocacy, senior executive cases, and the founding of BDBF. Along the way, Gareth shares candid stories about technological shifts, the rise of standalone employment practices, law firm mergers, and his most memorable cases – including whistleblowing, discrimination, bonus litigation, and restrictive covenants.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The early state of employment law and tribunal work in the 1990s
  • The impact of technology and client expectations on legal practice
  • Key mergers and consolidation in the legal sector
  • Shifts in case trends, legislation, and workplace culture over 30 years
  • Mentorship, professional values, and advice Gareth would give his younger self
  • How AI and technological advances are shaping the future of employment law



Packed full of practical insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law practitioners and anyone interested in the human side of a long and distinguished legal career.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Tom McLaughlin
www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom
Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves.

Gareth Brahams

linkedin.com/in/garethbrahams

Employment lawyer who has fought and won some of the biggest cases in whistleblowing, discrimination, restrictive covenants and stress at work claims.


]]> Mon, 09 Feb 2026 18:02:25 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 1677 In a special episode of The BDBF Podcast, Tom McLaughlin sits down with BDBF founding partner Gareth Brahams to mark the firm’s 13th anniversary and Gareth’s 30-year career in employment law.

Departing from the usual legal updates, the conversation offers a rich, reflective look at Gareth’s career journey, the evolution of the profession, and the landmark cases and trends that have shaped the field.

The episode traces Gareth’s early career, from his first role in 1995 and the limited scope of employment law at the time, through his experiences in tribunal advocacy, senior executive cases, and the founding of BDBF. Along the way, Gareth shares candid stories about technological shifts, the rise of standalone employment practices, law firm mergers, and his most memorable cases – including whistleblowing, discrimination, bonus litigation, and restrictive covenants.

Listeners will gain insights into:

  • The early state of employment law and tribunal work in the 1990s
  • The impact of technology and client expectations on legal practice
  • Key mergers and consolidation in the legal sector
  • Shifts in case trends, legislation, and workplace culture over 30 years
  • Mentorship, professional values, and advice Gareth would give his younger self
  • How AI and technological advances are shaping the future of employment law



Packed full of practical insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law practitioners and anyone interested in the human side of a long and distinguished legal career.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Tom McLaughlin
www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom
Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves.

Gareth Brahams

linkedin.com/in/garethbrahams

Employment lawyer who has fought and won some of the biggest cases in whistleblowing, discrimination, restrictive covenants and stress at work claims.


]]> Employment law, podcast, Tom McLaughlin, Gareth Brahams, Brahms Dutt Badrick French, BDBF, career journey, legal profession, employment law community, solicitor, employment law evolution, unfair dismissal, discrimination law, whistleblowing law, legal landscape, employment tribunals, legal market consolidation, case law, executive compensation, maternity discrimination, age discrimination, legal mentorship, client-centered values, technology in law, artificial intelligence, legal innovation, employment practice, legal advice, senior executives, employment law history, legal education, professional development, employment law updates, high-profile cases, litigation process, employment team, legal challenges, career milestones, legal ethics, workplace rights, statutory maternity pay, restrictive covenants, tribunal experience, legal profession future No The Henderson v GCRM Employment Tribunal Case | Balancing Protections & Employer Defenses 2 2 The Henderson v GCRM Employment Tribunal Case | Balancing Protections & Employer Defenses full 784c5c0d-cad2-46d8-8b97-e78f3f6665ca https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2169ded The Henderson v GCRM Implication: What The EAT Decision Really Means In Practice

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by employment law specialist Abdullah Ahmed to analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Henderson v GCRM and its implications for whistleblowing protection under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Tom and Abdullah begin by setting out the factual background to the case, including the disclosures made by Mr Henderson, the alleged detriments he claimed to have suffered, and the findings of the Employment Tribunal at first instance.

They also explore:
- What qualifies as a protected disclosure under the legislation
- The burden of proof in whistleblowing detriment claims
- Establishing causation between disclosure and alleged detriment
- The relevance of decision-maker knowledge and motivation Lessons from key authorities including Jhuti and Fecitt

The discussion details the EAT's reasoning on protected disclosures, focusing on the challenge for claimants when the decision-maker is unaware of the disclosure. Tom and Abdullah examine vicarious liability, the split between individual and corporate responsibility, and the necessity of precise legal pleadings in whistleblowing cases.

The episode ends with practical advice on the hurdles whistleblowers face (evidentiary/procedural) and best practices for employers managing disclosures. In addition to the lawyers mentioned in the Episode, Barry Ross of Crossland Solicitors instructed David Hay KC and Chris Milsom.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Tom McLaughlin www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom           Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves

Abdullah Ahmed www.linkedin.com/in/abdullah-idris-ahmed Specialist in employment law, acting as an Associate, with experience advising on the full scope of employment matters.

]]> The Henderson v GCRM Implication: What The EAT Decision Really Means In Practice

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by employment law specialist Abdullah Ahmed to analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Henderson v GCRM and its implications for whistleblowing protection under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Tom and Abdullah begin by setting out the factual background to the case, including the disclosures made by Mr Henderson, the alleged detriments he claimed to have suffered, and the findings of the Employment Tribunal at first instance.

They also explore:
- What qualifies as a protected disclosure under the legislation
- The burden of proof in whistleblowing detriment claims
- Establishing causation between disclosure and alleged detriment
- The relevance of decision-maker knowledge and motivation Lessons from key authorities including Jhuti and Fecitt

The discussion details the EAT's reasoning on protected disclosures, focusing on the challenge for claimants when the decision-maker is unaware of the disclosure. Tom and Abdullah examine vicarious liability, the split between individual and corporate responsibility, and the necessity of precise legal pleadings in whistleblowing cases.

The episode ends with practical advice on the hurdles whistleblowers face (evidentiary/procedural) and best practices for employers managing disclosures. In addition to the lawyers mentioned in the Episode, Barry Ross of Crossland Solicitors instructed David Hay KC and Chris Milsom.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Tom McLaughlin www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom           Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves

Abdullah Ahmed www.linkedin.com/in/abdullah-idris-ahmed Specialist in employment law, acting as an Associate, with experience advising on the full scope of employment matters.

]]> Mon, 02 Feb 2026 20:57:05 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 1366 The Henderson v GCRM Implication: What The EAT Decision Really Means In Practice

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by employment law specialist Abdullah Ahmed to analyse the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Henderson v GCRM and its implications for whistleblowing protection under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Tom and Abdullah begin by setting out the factual background to the case, including the disclosures made by Mr Henderson, the alleged detriments he claimed to have suffered, and the findings of the Employment Tribunal at first instance.

They also explore:
- What qualifies as a protected disclosure under the legislation
- The burden of proof in whistleblowing detriment claims
- Establishing causation between disclosure and alleged detriment
- The relevance of decision-maker knowledge and motivation Lessons from key authorities including Jhuti and Fecitt

The discussion details the EAT's reasoning on protected disclosures, focusing on the challenge for claimants when the decision-maker is unaware of the disclosure. Tom and Abdullah examine vicarious liability, the split between individual and corporate responsibility, and the necessity of precise legal pleadings in whistleblowing cases.

The episode ends with practical advice on the hurdles whistleblowers face (evidentiary/procedural) and best practices for employers managing disclosures. In addition to the lawyers mentioned in the Episode, Barry Ross of Crossland Solicitors instructed David Hay KC and Chris Milsom.

Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in to The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter: www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

Tom McLaughlin www.linkedin.com/in/emplwyrtom           Employment lawyer specialising in restrictive covenants, confidential information and team moves

Abdullah Ahmed www.linkedin.com/in/abdullah-idris-ahmed Specialist in employment law, acting as an Associate, with experience advising on the full scope of employment matters.

]]> Employment Law, Employment Appeal Tribunal, EAT, Whistleblowing Law, Employment Rights Act 1996, Legal Protections, Whistleblowers, Henderson case, GEC Limited, Royal Mail Ltd v. Dutton, Timmis v. Osipov, Decision-Maker Knowledge, Motivation, Liability, Dismissal Claims, Detriment Claims, Protected Disclosures, Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Section 103A, Section 47B, Financial Losses, Interim Relief, Legal Pleadings, Tribunal Findings, Employment Tribunal, Causation Test, Detriment by Dismissal, Employment Litigation, Claimant's Rights, Precedent Cases, Innocent Decision-Maker, Employer Liability, Procedural Failings, Employment Law Community, Podcast, Legal Insights, Whistleblower Protections, Claim Compensation, Tribunal Hearing, Legal Framework, Employment Claims, Legal Representation, Outer Temple, Cloisters Chambers. No Challenges in Cross-Border Employment Litigation | The Jurisdictional Jigsaw 1 1 Challenges in Cross-Border Employment Litigation | The Jurisdictional Jigsaw full daeeff80-f7fe-4b85-90f1-eb03dd77c4fd https://share.transistor.fm/s/234c8db7 Cross-border Employment Claims After Brexit: What Prahl v Lapinski Means in Practice…

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by colleagues: Partner Claire Dawson and Managing Associate Theo Nicou to unpack the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Prahl v Lapinski and its implications for international employment claims.

The three explore the jurisdictional challenges that arise when overseas respondents are involved in UK employment tribunal proceedings, with a particular focus on how the post-Brexit legal landscape has reshaped established principles. Tom, Claire and Theo examine recent developments around the service of claim forms on international parties and the tribunals’ increasingly expansive interpretation of “employee” and “employer” in cross-border cases.

The episode also explores:

  • Jurisdictional hurdles in claims involving overseas respondents
  • Service of tribunal claims under the post-Brexit regime
  • How Brexit has affected enforceability and procedural strategy
  • The widening interpretation of employment relationships
  • Practical steps to manage risk in international disputes
  • The ongoing Court of Appeal case and its impact on cross-border employment law.

Packed with practical guidance and strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law professionals advising on or litigating international employment claims in an increasingly complex jurisdictional environment.


Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter:
www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

]]> Cross-border Employment Claims After Brexit: What Prahl v Lapinski Means in Practice…

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by colleagues: Partner Claire Dawson and Managing Associate Theo Nicou to unpack the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Prahl v Lapinski and its implications for international employment claims.

The three explore the jurisdictional challenges that arise when overseas respondents are involved in UK employment tribunal proceedings, with a particular focus on how the post-Brexit legal landscape has reshaped established principles. Tom, Claire and Theo examine recent developments around the service of claim forms on international parties and the tribunals’ increasingly expansive interpretation of “employee” and “employer” in cross-border cases.

The episode also explores:

  • Jurisdictional hurdles in claims involving overseas respondents
  • Service of tribunal claims under the post-Brexit regime
  • How Brexit has affected enforceability and procedural strategy
  • The widening interpretation of employment relationships
  • Practical steps to manage risk in international disputes
  • The ongoing Court of Appeal case and its impact on cross-border employment law.

Packed with practical guidance and strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law professionals advising on or litigating international employment claims in an increasingly complex jurisdictional environment.


Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter:
www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

]]> Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:00:00 +0000 BDBF LLP BDBF LLP 1657 Cross-border Employment Claims After Brexit: What Prahl v Lapinski Means in Practice…

In this episode of The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, host Tom McLaughlin is joined by colleagues: Partner Claire Dawson and Managing Associate Theo Nicou to unpack the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Prahl v Lapinski and its implications for international employment claims.

The three explore the jurisdictional challenges that arise when overseas respondents are involved in UK employment tribunal proceedings, with a particular focus on how the post-Brexit legal landscape has reshaped established principles. Tom, Claire and Theo examine recent developments around the service of claim forms on international parties and the tribunals’ increasingly expansive interpretation of “employee” and “employer” in cross-border cases.

The episode also explores:

  • Jurisdictional hurdles in claims involving overseas respondents
  • Service of tribunal claims under the post-Brexit regime
  • How Brexit has affected enforceability and procedural strategy
  • The widening interpretation of employment relationships
  • Practical steps to manage risk in international disputes
  • The ongoing Court of Appeal case and its impact on cross-border employment law.

Packed with practical guidance and strategic insight, this episode is essential listening for employment law professionals advising on or litigating international employment claims in an increasingly complex jurisdictional environment.


Disclaimer: Views of external guest speakers do not represent those of BDBF.

Contact BDBF

Thank you for tuning in toThe BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community, where we dive practical guidance, expert analysis, and updates on employment law developments.

For more behind-the-scenes content, exclusive events, and expert insights, please visit our website or follow us on your favourite social platform.

We’d love to hear from you, particularly with feedback on the Podcast and requests for topics to cover in future episodes.  Drop us a line podcast@bdbf.co.uk

Find out more:
Website: www.bdbf.co.uk/
Email: info@bdbf.co.uk
Phone: +44(0)20 3828 0350

Connect with us:
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/brahams-dutt-badrick-french-llp/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDBFLLP/
X: www.x.com/BDBF_LLP

Sign up to our newsletter:
www.bdbf.co.uk/newsletter-signup/

]]> No