<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/syndication-attorney-field-notes-with-tilden-moschetti" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>Syndication Attorney Field Notes with Tilden Moschetti</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/syndication-attorney-field-notes-with-tilden-moschetti</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Syndication Attorney Field Notes is a short-form educational podcast from Tilden Moschetti for sponsors, real estate syndicators, fund managers, and business owners raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

Each episode breaks down one issue from the legal notebook: finder’s fees, broker-dealer registration, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), investor verification, private placement memorandums, subscription agreements, Form D, Blue Sky filings, fund structure, and the mistakes that show up before the documents are drafted.

Plain-English field notes. One issue, one misconception, one practical takeaway. Public education only, not legal advice.</description>
    <copyright>(c) 2026 Moschetti Syndication Law PLLC</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>eff38f4a-d144-50f5-a2d8-5d4ed05193c8</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:38:30 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:39:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <link>http://www.moschettilaw.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Investing"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Vlo6w6HOYP2nCJsHx-PBcKPPB3KWyQ02YaaaIxptINk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jMTY1/Nzc5M2I2NTYzMDYw/MWI5MDRkNzM5NDdm/MjRjMC5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Syndication Attorney Field Notes is a short-form educational podcast from Tilden Moschetti for sponsors, real estate syndicators, fund managers, and business owners raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

Each episode breaks down one issue from the legal notebook: finder’s fees, broker-dealer registration, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), investor verification, private placement memorandums, subscription agreements, Form D, Blue Sky filings, fund structure, and the mistakes that show up before the documents are drafted.

Plain-English field notes. One issue, one misconception, one practical takeaway. Public education only, not legal advice.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Syndication Attorney Field Notes is a short-form educational podcast from Tilden Moschetti for sponsors, real estate syndicators, fund managers, and business owners raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>info@moschettilaw.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Fund vs. Syndication in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>Fund vs. Syndication in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec724acc-4adf-4bbc-ad6d-dcc3221b5101</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a9339025</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we look at the transition from a single-asset real estate syndication to a blind-pool fund. While both can be raised as Regulation D private placements, the legal container is fundamentally different. A syndication is built around one known asset, while a fund is built around a sponsor's strategy and track record. We explain how this shift affects PPM disclosures and capital calls, and discuss potential investment adviser risk if a fund moves from buying direct real estate into buying LP interests in other syndications. Let your pipeline dictate your legal structure.<p>Also see: Fund vs. Syndication: Regulation D Legal Guide for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-vs-syndication-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we look at the transition from a single-asset real estate syndication to a blind-pool fund. While both can be raised as Regulation D private placements, the legal container is fundamentally different. A syndication is built around one known asset, while a fund is built around a sponsor's strategy and track record. We explain how this shift affects PPM disclosures and capital calls, and discuss potential investment adviser risk if a fund moves from buying direct real estate into buying LP interests in other syndications. Let your pipeline dictate your legal structure.<p>Also see: Fund vs. Syndication: Regulation D Legal Guide for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-vs-syndication-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a9339025/a26ade0f.mp3" length="5920017" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>370</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the legal differences between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool investment fund raised as Regulation D private placements.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the legal differences between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool investment fund raised as Regulation D private placements.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a9339025/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sponsor Entity vs. Investment Entity vs. Asset SPV in Reg D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Sponsor Entity vs. Investment Entity vs. Asset SPV in Reg D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">707c4686-60d3-44ad-b75e-9d408297dc1a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b2afe730</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the three-box legal architecture for a Reg D syndication: the Sponsor Entity, the Investment Entity, and the Asset SPV. Placing management, LP capital, and property liability into a single LLC can raise risk concentration issues. We discuss how separating these functions helps reduce gridlock, clarify who the actual issuer of the securities is, and isolate asset-level liability. Learn how authority flows down, cash flows up, and why an SPV acts as a firewall rather than a guaranteed forcefield.<p>Also see: Sponsor Entity, Investment Entity &amp; SPVs in Reg D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the three-box legal architecture for a Reg D syndication: the Sponsor Entity, the Investment Entity, and the Asset SPV. Placing management, LP capital, and property liability into a single LLC can raise risk concentration issues. We discuss how separating these functions helps reduce gridlock, clarify who the actual issuer of the securities is, and isolate asset-level liability. Learn how authority flows down, cash flows up, and why an SPV acts as a firewall rather than a guaranteed forcefield.<p>Also see: Sponsor Entity, Investment Entity &amp; SPVs in Reg D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:23:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b2afe730/b7b7e5cb.mp3" length="6280298" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D syndication often uses a three-box entity structure—a Sponsor Entity, an Investment Entity, and an Asset SPV—to separate management control, LP capital, and property-level liability.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D syndication often uses a three-box entity structure—a Sponsor Entity, an Investment Entity, and an Asset SPV—to separate management control, LP capital, and property-level </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b2afe730/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Form D vs. a PPM in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>Form D vs. a PPM in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc2418dc-0ff1-4145-a0cd-4d0db25d59c2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/28e66cde</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we address a common misconception in Regulation D private placements: treating a Form D filing as a substitute for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Tilden explains the distinct roles of each document. A PPM provides pre-sale investor disclosure and documents deal risks, while Form D serves as a post-sale administrative notice to the SEC. Understanding this separation can help sponsors build a stronger, more credible foundation for their capital raise. Read the full article: [ARTICLE_URL]<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we address a common misconception in Regulation D private placements: treating a Form D filing as a substitute for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Tilden explains the distinct roles of each document. A PPM provides pre-sale investor disclosure and documents deal risks, while Form D serves as a post-sale administrative notice to the SEC. Understanding this separation can help sponsors build a stronger, more credible foundation for their capital raise. Read the full article: [ARTICLE_URL]<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:18:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/28e66cde/fe18f59c.mp3" length="5735279" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>359</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Form D filing does not replace a PPM in a Regulation D private placement. Learn the difference between pre-sale investor disclosure and post-sale regulator notice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Form D filing does not replace a PPM in a Regulation D private placement. Learn the difference between pre-sale investor disclosure and post-sale regulator notice.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/28e66cde/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When Is Form D Due in a Regulation D Offering?</title>
      <itunes:title>When Is Form D Due in a Regulation D Offering?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cace52a3-66a7-49a8-b189-bd832c55e2b8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0bf3191d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we examine the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume the filing clock starts when an investor's wire clears. The reality is that the 15-calendar-day deadline generally runs from the first sale, which often occurs when a binding subscription is accepted. Tilden explains how this timeline works, why rolling closes do not delay the federal deadline, and how late filings can create state Blue Sky notice filing fees.<p>Also see: When Is Form D Due? First Sale in Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we examine the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume the filing clock starts when an investor's wire clears. The reality is that the 15-calendar-day deadline generally runs from the first sale, which often occurs when a binding subscription is accepted. Tilden explains how this timeline works, why rolling closes do not delay the federal deadline, and how late filings can create state Blue Sky notice filing fees.<p>Also see: When Is Form D Due? First Sale in Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:03:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0bf3191d/bd3ca75e.mp3" length="5825559" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>365</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how to calculate the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement, noting that the 15-calendar-day clock often starts when a subscription is accepted rather than when the wire clears.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how to calculate the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement, noting that the 15-calendar-day clock often starts when a subscription is accepted rather than when the wire clears.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0bf3191d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees</title>
      <itunes:title>Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50980867-42f7-410e-b0b7-bcdd48dd85c1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/273abf54</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore Blue Sky Laws in the context of a Rule 506 offering. While federal law generally preempts full state registration, sponsors can still be responsible for state notice filings and filing fees. Tilden explains how investor residency drives the state filing map, why the federal Form D serves as your master document, and how states retain their anti-fraud authority. This field note clarifies the administrative reality of multi-state capital raises.<p>Also see: Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees at https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws-rule-506</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore Blue Sky Laws in the context of a Rule 506 offering. While federal law generally preempts full state registration, sponsors can still be responsible for state notice filings and filing fees. Tilden explains how investor residency drives the state filing map, why the federal Form D serves as your master document, and how states retain their anti-fraud authority. This field note clarifies the administrative reality of multi-state capital raises.<p>Also see: Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees at https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws-rule-506</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:03:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/273abf54/fc9b39e8.mp3" length="6454169" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how Blue Sky Laws apply to a Rule 506 Regulation D private placement, focusing on state notice filings, fees, and investor residency.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how Blue Sky Laws apply to a Rule 506 Regulation D private placement, focusing on state notice filings, fees, and investor residency.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/273abf54/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SEC Form D Deadlines in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>SEC Form D Deadlines in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad191f13-fdfe-417a-b9a7-5886cfed3864</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9850b5dc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we explore the SEC Form D filing timeline for a Regulation D private placement. Treating Form D as after-closing paperwork can create timing and operational challenges. The episode explains how the 15-day deadline is tied to the first sale—often the irrevocable investor commitment rather than the final wire transfer. We also discuss why SEC EDGAR access takes time to set up and how a federal Form D filing connects to state Blue Sky notice filings. Tune in to understand how to map your federal and state filing timelines before accepting the first investor dollar.<p>Also see: SEC Form D Filing Deadlines for Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we explore the SEC Form D filing timeline for a Regulation D private placement. Treating Form D as after-closing paperwork can create timing and operational challenges. The episode explains how the 15-day deadline is tied to the first sale—often the irrevocable investor commitment rather than the final wire transfer. We also discuss why SEC EDGAR access takes time to set up and how a federal Form D filing connects to state Blue Sky notice filings. Tune in to understand how to map your federal and state filing timelines before accepting the first investor dollar.<p>Also see: SEC Form D Filing Deadlines for Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:02:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9850b5dc/ff87dd86.mp3" length="5588158" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the SEC Form D filing process for Regulation D private placements, detailing how the 15-day first-sale deadline, EDGAR setup, and state Blue Sky notice filings work together.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the SEC Form D filing process for Regulation D private placements, detailing how the 15-day first-sale deadline, EDGAR setup, and state Blue Sky notice filings work together.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9850b5dc/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is an Investor Questionnaire in a Regulation D Private Placement?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is an Investor Questionnaire in a Regulation D Private Placement?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">163df5ff-d565-476f-934d-afbcf1b24e36</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/535ffa49</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the role of the investor questionnaire in a Regulation D private placement. Sponsors often confuse this legal eligibility document with a retail risk-tolerance survey. The episode clarifies how the right questionnaire helps establish accredited investor status by capturing income, net worth, and entity details. We also discuss how the form's role can shift depending on whether the offering relies on Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is an Investor Questionnaire for Regulation D? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the role of the investor questionnaire in a Regulation D private placement. Sponsors often confuse this legal eligibility document with a retail risk-tolerance survey. The episode clarifies how the right questionnaire helps establish accredited investor status by capturing income, net worth, and entity details. We also discuss how the form's role can shift depending on whether the offering relies on Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is an Investor Questionnaire for Regulation D? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:17:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/535ffa49/5eb2aa0a.mp3" length="6732112" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>421</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the investor questionnaire functions in a Regulation D private placement to help determine accredited investor status, rather than assessing retail risk tolerance.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the investor questionnaire functions in a Regulation D private placement to help determine accredited investor status, rather than assessing retail risk tolerance.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/535ffa49/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subscription Agreement vs. PPM vs. Operating Agreement in Reg D</title>
      <itunes:title>Subscription Agreement vs. PPM vs. Operating Agreement in Reg D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f7c459e-b9c1-4d3e-8577-cabba87b551c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/add900b5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the distinct roles of the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement in a Regulation D private placement. Treating these documents as simple onboarding forms can create legal and operational gaps for a syndication sponsor. Listen to understand the difference between disclosure, governance, and admission, and why a signed Subscription Agreement and a cleared wire are only an offer to invest until the sponsor formally countersigns.<p>Also see: Subscription Agreement vs PPM vs Operating Agreement: Reg D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the distinct roles of the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement in a Regulation D private placement. Treating these documents as simple onboarding forms can create legal and operational gaps for a syndication sponsor. Listen to understand the difference between disclosure, governance, and admission, and why a signed Subscription Agreement and a cleared wire are only an offer to invest until the sponsor formally countersigns.<p>Also see: Subscription Agreement vs PPM vs Operating Agreement: Reg D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:07:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/add900b5/5487e3ab.mp3" length="5342816" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>334</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement work together in a Regulation D private placement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement work together in a Regulation D private placement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/add900b5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification</title>
      <itunes:title>Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41218580-c2c9-4d92-88ef-ec55005368ff</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a69ac2e2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the boundary between a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire and Rule 506(c) verification. When a sponsor publicly advertises a specific offering through general solicitation, the legal standard shifts from an investor self-certifying their status to the sponsor taking reasonable steps to verify it. Tilden explains why legacy paperwork does not easily carry over to new public raises, how a professional confirmation letter can reduce onboarding friction, and why verification portals act as workflow tools rather than liability shields.<p>Also see: Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification at https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the boundary between a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire and Rule 506(c) verification. When a sponsor publicly advertises a specific offering through general solicitation, the legal standard shifts from an investor self-certifying their status to the sponsor taking reasonable steps to verify it. Tilden explains why legacy paperwork does not easily carry over to new public raises, how a professional confirmation letter can reduce onboarding friction, and why verification portals act as workflow tools rather than liability shields.<p>Also see: Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification at https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:07:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a69ac2e2/2b98ee50.mp3" length="5689722" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>356</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire is not enough for a publicly advertised Rule 506(c) Regulation D private placement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire is not enough for a publicly advertised Rule 506(c) Regulation D private placement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a69ac2e2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0eaed8b0-fc78-479f-919a-3c479ef94df9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7e9abe81</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains what a Subscription Agreement actually does in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume a signed form and a wire mean an investor has officially joined the syndication. However, the investor's signature is merely an offer of capital. The agreement binds only when the sponsor accepts and countersigns. This episode covers how the document records vital investor representations and warranties, how it interacts with the PPM and Operating Agreement, and how it handles accredited investor claims under Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains what a Subscription Agreement actually does in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume a signed form and a wire mean an investor has officially joined the syndication. However, the investor's signature is merely an offer of capital. The agreement binds only when the sponsor accepts and countersigns. This episode covers how the document records vital investor representations and warranties, how it interacts with the PPM and Operating Agreement, and how it handles accredited investor claims under Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:06:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7e9abe81/44e1d58d.mp3" length="6057526" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>379</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Subscription Agreement functions as the point-of-sale contract in a Regulation D private placement, rather than just routine onboarding paperwork.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Subscription Agreement functions as the point-of-sale contract in a Regulation D private placement, rather than just routine onboarding paperwork.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7e9abe81/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LLC vs. LP Entity Choice for Regulation D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>LLC vs. LP Entity Choice for Regulation D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c635a1c-a826-44e1-a239-a2bb009cab88</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6e289c06</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we explore the LLC vs. LP entity choice for Regulation D syndications. Choosing the right container for a private placement is an architectural decision that affects sponsor liability and investor expectations. Tilden explains why manager-managed LLCs often fit raises involving individual accredited investors, and why institutional capital frequently points toward an LP. Crucially, the episode covers the potential 'Naked GP' trap in Limited Partnerships and how adding a GP LLC dual-entity structure can help manage sponsor exposure.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this episode does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding your specific securities offering.<p>Also see: Limited Liability Company vs. LP for Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we explore the LLC vs. LP entity choice for Regulation D syndications. Choosing the right container for a private placement is an architectural decision that affects sponsor liability and investor expectations. Tilden explains why manager-managed LLCs often fit raises involving individual accredited investors, and why institutional capital frequently points toward an LP. Crucially, the episode covers the potential 'Naked GP' trap in Limited Partnerships and how adding a GP LLC dual-entity structure can help manage sponsor exposure.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this episode does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding your specific securities offering.<p>Also see: Limited Liability Company vs. LP for Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6e289c06/d17c0675.mp3" length="6161598" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>386</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how LLC vs. LP entity choice in a Regulation D syndication affects sponsor liability and investor expectations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how LLC vs. LP entity choice in a Regulation D syndication affects sponsor liability and investor expectations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6e289c06/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">609b2a72-8936-4054-9f54-c8c6bdb20d13</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/77f02047</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. Today's note covers the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a private fund. The episode explains how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital coming in, GP authority, and the distribution waterfall—distinct from the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Subscription Agreement. Tune in to understand why the legal text of your LPA should accurately reflect your fund's operational reality.<p>Also see: What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. Today's note covers the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a private fund. The episode explains how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital coming in, GP authority, and the distribution waterfall—distinct from the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Subscription Agreement. Tune in to understand why the legal text of your LPA should accurately reflect your fund's operational reality.<p>Also see: What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:21:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/77f02047/e5a9e82e.mp3" length="5677183" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>355</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the role of a Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a Regulation D private fund. The episode clarifies how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital calls, GP authority, and the distribution waterfall—distinct from the PPM.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the role of a Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a Regulation D private fund. The episode clarifies how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital calls, GP</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/77f02047/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is an Operating Agreement in a Regulation D Syndication?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is an Operating Agreement in a Regulation D Syndication?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e385b4f-746f-42dd-a66e-645cd0bfe3fb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7cc324ee</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the distinct roles of the Private Placement Memorandum and the LLC Operating Agreement. If the PPM is the brochure, the Operating Agreement is the engine. We explain how this binding contract governs the distribution waterfall, preferred returns, sponsor promote, and manager control in a private placement capital raise.<p>Also see: What Is an Operating Agreement in a Reg D Syndication? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the distinct roles of the Private Placement Memorandum and the LLC Operating Agreement. If the PPM is the brochure, the Operating Agreement is the engine. We explain how this binding contract governs the distribution waterfall, preferred returns, sponsor promote, and manager control in a private placement capital raise.<p>Also see: What Is an Operating Agreement in a Reg D Syndication? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:12:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7cc324ee/0c5fa06f.mp3" length="6860008" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>429</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how the LLC Operating Agreement turns PPM disclosures into binding mechanics for sponsor control, fees, and distributions in a Regulation D syndication capital raise.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how the LLC Operating Agreement turns PPM disclosures into binding mechanics for sponsor control, fees, and distributions in a Regulation D syndication capital raise.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7cc324ee/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Operating Agreement vs. PPM vs. Subscription Agreement in a Reg D Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>Operating Agreement vs. PPM vs. Subscription Agreement in a Reg D Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cae96773-5018-4fda-8a66-d9622aa9a4ee</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/411d4f9b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the difference between the Operating Agreement, the PPM, and the Subscription Agreement in a private placement. Treating these documents as interchangeable forms can create document drift right before a closing. The episode explains how to view them as one coordinated legal engine: the Operating Agreement for governance, the PPM for disclosure, and the Subscription Agreement for execution.<p>Also see: Reg D: Operating Agreement vs PPM vs Subscription Agreement at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the difference between the Operating Agreement, the PPM, and the Subscription Agreement in a private placement. Treating these documents as interchangeable forms can create document drift right before a closing. The episode explains how to view them as one coordinated legal engine: the Operating Agreement for governance, the PPM for disclosure, and the Subscription Agreement for execution.<p>Also see: Reg D: Operating Agreement vs PPM vs Subscription Agreement at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:46:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/411d4f9b/de0cc7a5.mp3" length="6284896" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a Regulation D private placement, confusing your offering documents can create inconsistencies. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Operating Agreement, PPM, and Subscription Agreement work as one coordinated system for governance, disclosure, and execution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a Regulation D private placement, confusing your offering documents can create inconsistencies. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Operating Agreement, PPM, and Subscription Agreement work as one coordinated system for governance, d</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/411d4f9b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a PPM Matters in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>Why a PPM Matters in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a3b5ed0-46ba-45c9-b5a9-6fc29a22e993</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1c04222</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) matters even if your Regulation D private placement accepts only accredited investors. While an exemption like Rule 506(c) may not prescribe a specific disclosure format, anti-fraud rules regarding material omissions still apply to the securities offering. Tilden explains how a PPM can help document that risks, conflicts of interest, and material facts were clearly disclosed before accepting investor capital.<p>Also see: Why You Need a Private Placement Memorandum in Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) matters even if your Regulation D private placement accepts only accredited investors. While an exemption like Rule 506(c) may not prescribe a specific disclosure format, anti-fraud rules regarding material omissions still apply to the securities offering. Tilden explains how a PPM can help document that risks, conflicts of interest, and material facts were clearly disclosed before accepting investor capital.<p>Also see: Why You Need a Private Placement Memorandum in Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:41:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c1c04222/411b6409.mp3" length="7320181" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>458</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) can still be a valuable disclosure record in a Regulation D private placement, even when raising capital exclusively from accredited investors.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) can still be a valuable disclosure record in a Regulation D private placement, even when raising capital exclusively from accredited investor</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1c04222/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asset Management vs Property Management in Real Estate Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Asset Management vs Property Management in Real Estate Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df484c80-fd49-4c03-91c9-79a9038e9b63</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2131755f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors navigating asset management vs property management in a real estate syndication. This episode explains the difference between building-level property management work and investment-level asset management strategy. Blurring these roles can create fee structure issues and confusion over a sponsor's fiduciary duties to limited partners. Listen to learn how to properly separate asset management fees from property management fees, handle affiliate conflicts when using a sponsor-owned property manager, and clearly document these arrangements in your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and standalone property management agreement.<p>Also see: Asset Management vs Property Management in Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors navigating asset management vs property management in a real estate syndication. This episode explains the difference between building-level property management work and investment-level asset management strategy. Blurring these roles can create fee structure issues and confusion over a sponsor's fiduciary duties to limited partners. Listen to learn how to properly separate asset management fees from property management fees, handle affiliate conflicts when using a sponsor-owned property manager, and clearly document these arrangements in your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and standalone property management agreement.<p>Also see: Asset Management vs Property Management in Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:50:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2131755f/d5f1aae6.mp3" length="8351286" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>522</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how sponsors can cleanly separate asset management from property management in a real estate syndication, and why blurring the two can raise fee and fiduciary duty questions.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how sponsors can cleanly separate asset management from property management in a real estate syndication, and why blurring the two can raise fee and fiduciary duty questions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2131755f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators</title>
      <itunes:title>144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bf0c770-d2f3-4cbd-a9d4-71626321f42e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/78f32944</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A 144A offering can sound like a faster private placement, but for most mid-market syndicators, it may not be the appropriate framework. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti unpacks why Rule 144A is designed as a resale safe harbor for Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), while Regulation D serves as the issuer exemption for primary capital raises. Listeners will learn the mechanical difference between secondary resales and primary issuances, the wealth gap between accredited investors and QIBs, and why building clean Regulation D infrastructure is usually the practical path for an investment fund securities offering.<p>Also see: 144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators at https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A 144A offering can sound like a faster private placement, but for most mid-market syndicators, it may not be the appropriate framework. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti unpacks why Rule 144A is designed as a resale safe harbor for Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), while Regulation D serves as the issuer exemption for primary capital raises. Listeners will learn the mechanical difference between secondary resales and primary issuances, the wealth gap between accredited investors and QIBs, and why building clean Regulation D infrastructure is usually the practical path for an investment fund securities offering.<p>Also see: 144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators at https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:23:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/78f32944/81f9439f.mp3" length="7337735" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>459</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a 144A offering is a resale safe harbor for QIBs, not a primary capital raise. Mid-market sponsors issuing new securities in a private placement generally rely on Regulation D instead.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a 144A offering is a resale safe harbor for QIBs, not a primary capital raise. Mid-market sponsors issuing new securities in a private placement genera</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/78f32944/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c359273-2bc9-44e7-b322-35c59a7f4493</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0ab837b1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores when a real estate joint venture moves into potential securities offering territory. Many sponsors believe that raising passive capital from just a few friends under a JV agreement keeps the deal outside of federal securities law. However, if the capital partners are simply writing checks and relying on the sponsor's efforts for profit, the arrangement may need to be analyzed as a Regulation D syndication. Tune in to learn how economic reality, practical control, and industry expertise separate true active joint ventures from passive real estate investments.<p>Also see: Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores when a real estate joint venture moves into potential securities offering territory. Many sponsors believe that raising passive capital from just a few friends under a JV agreement keeps the deal outside of federal securities law. However, if the capital partners are simply writing checks and relying on the sponsor's efforts for profit, the arrangement may need to be analyzed as a Regulation D syndication. Tune in to learn how economic reality, practical control, and industry expertise separate true active joint ventures from passive real estate investments.<p>Also see: Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:26:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0ab837b1/5452215f.mp3" length="6643923" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how raising passive capital for a real estate deal can move an arrangement out of joint venture territory and into a potential Regulation D syndication.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how raising passive capital for a real estate deal can move an arrangement out of joint venture territory and into a potential Regulation D syndication.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0ab837b1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using a Convertible Promissory Note Before a Rule 506 Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>Using a Convertible Promissory Note Before a Rule 506 Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">626e86b8-90ef-4ec4-9d51-729a3ed640db</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b4dff86e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we look at why using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement acts as a current debt liability. A real estate syndication sponsor often uses these notes to secure early funds, but treating them as future equity can raise unexpected issues with senior lender covenants, subordination, and SEC integration. We cover why startup templates generally do not fit a leveraged capital stack and how to structure early money so it aligns with both the commercial bank and the main Regulation D offering.<p>Also see: Convertible Promissory Note for Real Estate Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we look at why using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement acts as a current debt liability. A real estate syndication sponsor often uses these notes to secure early funds, but treating them as future equity can raise unexpected issues with senior lender covenants, subordination, and SEC integration. We cover why startup templates generally do not fit a leveraged capital stack and how to structure early money so it aligns with both the commercial bank and the main Regulation D offering.<p>Also see: Convertible Promissory Note for Real Estate Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b4dff86e/174bd938.mp3" length="8038653" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>503</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement can create immediate debt liabilities, affecting senior lender covenants and SEC integration.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement can create immediate debt liabilities, affecting senior lender covenants and SEC integration.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b4dff86e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals</title>
      <itunes:title>Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f785a35a-da3e-49dc-81e4-df1cc9b2ef61</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cbb64bf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

When a sponsor buys property through a real estate syndication, deciding where the asset sits in the entity stack is a primary structural choice. In this episode, we explore the role of the single purpose entity (SPE) in an investment fund. The issue is often confused with generic LLC formation, but an SPE is intentionally restricted by lender covenants to own one asset and carry one commercial mortgage.

The episode explains why reusing an old dormant LLC may raise underwriting concerns for commercial lenders, and details the typical three-tier structure of a multi-asset real estate fund. Listeners will learn how separating the investor-facing fund entity from the lender-facing asset-level LLC helps keep the capital raise and the commercial debt in their respective lanes.<p>Also see: Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals at https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

When a sponsor buys property through a real estate syndication, deciding where the asset sits in the entity stack is a primary structural choice. In this episode, we explore the role of the single purpose entity (SPE) in an investment fund. The issue is often confused with generic LLC formation, but an SPE is intentionally restricted by lender covenants to own one asset and carry one commercial mortgage.

The episode explains why reusing an old dormant LLC may raise underwriting concerns for commercial lenders, and details the typical three-tier structure of a multi-asset real estate fund. Listeners will learn how separating the investor-facing fund entity from the lender-facing asset-level LLC helps keep the capital raise and the commercial debt in their respective lanes.<p>Also see: Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals at https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 22:05:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0cbb64bf/ee52c73c.mp3" length="8843224" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>553</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how a single purpose entity (SPE) functions in a Regulation D real estate syndication to keep property collateral, commercial debt, and investor capital in separate lanes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how a single purpose entity (SPE) functions in a Regulation D real estate syndication to keep property collateral, commercial debt, and investor capital in separate lanes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cbb64bf/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hedge Fund Incubator Before a Regulation D Fund Raise</title>
      <itunes:title>Hedge Fund Incubator Before a Regulation D Fund Raise</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ce34782-9128-4f9e-99a0-779d801ae7b0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/784d8dba</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A hedge fund incubator is a business phase, not an SEC exemption. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the transition from trading proprietary capital to accepting outside investor capital changes your legal framework. Taking passive money—even from friends and family—or publicly promoting returns can move a project into a Regulation D private fund offering. We cover track record marketing, net-of-fee performance, and why it can be helpful to decide on your private placement structure before taking outside funds.<p>Also see: Hedge Fund Incubator: From Trading to Regulation D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A hedge fund incubator is a business phase, not an SEC exemption. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the transition from trading proprietary capital to accepting outside investor capital changes your legal framework. Taking passive money—even from friends and family—or publicly promoting returns can move a project into a Regulation D private fund offering. We cover track record marketing, net-of-fee performance, and why it can be helpful to decide on your private placement structure before taking outside funds.<p>Also see: Hedge Fund Incubator: From Trading to Regulation D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:17:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/784d8dba/ef8120b9.mp3" length="7700524" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>482</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how an emerging manager's hedge fund incubator phase can transition into a Regulation D private fund offering once outside investor capital is introduced.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how an emerging manager's hedge fund incubator phase can transition into a Regulation D private fund offering once outside investor capital is introduced.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/784d8dba/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors</title>
      <itunes:title>Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">931f029b-95c0-4139-bd84-7ca22f5d0807</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0f24609d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings. In this episode: why a clean Rule 506 capital raise does not answer whether the management company may have exempt reporting adviser status questions. Tilden explains the separation between the Securities Act and the Investment Advisers Act, how the $150 million RAUM threshold functions for private fund sponsors, and why uncalled capital commitments and state Blue Sky adviser rules can affect a management company's regulatory posture.<p>Also see: Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings. In this episode: why a clean Rule 506 capital raise does not answer whether the management company may have exempt reporting adviser status questions. Tilden explains the separation between the Securities Act and the Investment Advisers Act, how the $150 million RAUM threshold functions for private fund sponsors, and why uncalled capital commitments and state Blue Sky adviser rules can affect a management company's regulatory posture.<p>Also see: Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:35:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0f24609d/d3994913.mp3" length="6921866" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>433</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D private placement covers the capital raise, but the private fund management company may still need to evaluate exempt reporting adviser status.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D private placement covers the capital raise, but the private fund management company may still need to evaluate exempt reporting adviser status.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0f24609d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real Estate Development Financing: Regulation D Equity and Senior Debt</title>
      <itunes:title>Real Estate Development Financing: Regulation D Equity and Senior Debt</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d57e71ab-93ce-43c0-b456-5f689f1d27b3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6b8107b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development deal can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt. If an operating agreement promises mandatory distributions or secondary investor liens, it may raise subordination issues during bank review. Tilden explains the distinction between financial feasibility and legal feasibility, illustrating how the legal architecture of the equity layer can determine whether a development financing moves forward.

Read the full field note: [ARTICLE_URL]

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. The discussion of real estate development financing and Regulation D offerings is general in nature. Every capital raise depends on specific facts. Consult a qualified attorney before structuring your capital stack.<p>Also see: Real Estate Development Financing with Regulation D Equity at https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development deal can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt. If an operating agreement promises mandatory distributions or secondary investor liens, it may raise subordination issues during bank review. Tilden explains the distinction between financial feasibility and legal feasibility, illustrating how the legal architecture of the equity layer can determine whether a development financing moves forward.

Read the full field note: [ARTICLE_URL]

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. The discussion of real estate development financing and Regulation D offerings is general in nature. Every capital raise depends on specific facts. Consult a qualified attorney before structuring your capital stack.<p>Also see: Real Estate Development Financing with Regulation D Equity at https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 19:37:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c6b8107b/2da3b3fa.mp3" length="8154427" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>510</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt covenants.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt covenants.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6b8107b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>506(c) vs 506(b): Private Raise or Public Marketing</title>
      <itunes:title>506(c) vs 506(b): Private Raise or Public Marketing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75e66832-e21f-47db-abd5-e71dc5f9f0e7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/089f5246</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice. A common mismatch occurs when a sponsor wants the flexibility of a private 506(b) raise but the visibility of a public marketing campaign. We look at why the choice of exemption is ultimately a capital-source decision, the practical difference between private relationship discipline and general solicitation, and how accredited investor verification factors into the Rule 506(c) path.<p>Also see: 506(c) vs 506(b): Regulation D Capital Raise Choices at https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice. A common mismatch occurs when a sponsor wants the flexibility of a private 506(b) raise but the visibility of a public marketing campaign. We look at why the choice of exemption is ultimately a capital-source decision, the practical difference between private relationship discipline and general solicitation, and how accredited investor verification factors into the Rule 506(c) path.<p>Also see: 506(c) vs 506(b): Regulation D Capital Raise Choices at https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:32:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/089f5246/0dcc75af.mp3" length="8281487" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>518</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can evaluate the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice for a Regulation D private placement. The decision depends on whether the capital raise relies on private relationships or public marketing.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can evaluate the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice for a Regulation D private placement. The decision depends on whether the capital raise relies on private relation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/089f5246/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors</title>
      <itunes:title>Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8cafe514-5baf-4bab-a99d-8c7c06277cc4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b383c31d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the choice between closed-end vs open-end private equity funds. A common misconception is that an open-end fund is simply an evergreen marketing wrapper. Depending on the facts, an open-end structure can create significant operational demands, including continuous NAV calculation, redemption gates, lock-ups, and ongoing Form D amendments. Tilden explains why your private placement structure should follow your asset liquidity, and how to match your redemption rights to what the underlying assets can actually support.<p>Also see: Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the choice between closed-end vs open-end private equity funds. A common misconception is that an open-end fund is simply an evergreen marketing wrapper. Depending on the facts, an open-end structure can create significant operational demands, including continuous NAV calculation, redemption gates, lock-ups, and ongoing Form D amendments. Tilden explains why your private placement structure should follow your asset liquidity, and how to match your redemption rights to what the underlying assets can actually support.<p>Also see: Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 23:01:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b383c31d/f671706a.mp3" length="7568031" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>473</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors should navigate closed-end vs open-end private equity funds in a Regulation D offering. The choice ultimately comes down to matching the private fund's legal structure to the underlying asset liquidity.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors should navigate closed-end vs open-end private equity funds in a Regulation D offering. The choice ultimately comes down to matching the private fund's legal structure to the </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b383c31d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17bc7179-475c-49f8-b86f-9fe0628cd323</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/68fd1ea5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we look at preferred equity investments in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume preferred equity is a standard yield product, but it is actually a set of priority distribution rights drafted into the LLC operating agreement waterfall. The episode explains how a properly drafted preferred return can create a soft accrual rather than a hard debt default, giving the sponsor flexibility during a cash flow pause. Tilden also highlights the potential overlap with senior lender covenants, tax treatment, and offering documents, showing why the pitch deck and PPM should frame the investment as a priority position rather than a guaranteed return.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we look at preferred equity investments in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume preferred equity is a standard yield product, but it is actually a set of priority distribution rights drafted into the LLC operating agreement waterfall. The episode explains how a properly drafted preferred return can create a soft accrual rather than a hard debt default, giving the sponsor flexibility during a cash flow pause. Tilden also highlights the potential overlap with senior lender covenants, tax treatment, and offering documents, showing why the pitch deck and PPM should frame the investment as a priority position rather than a guaranteed return.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:07:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/68fd1ea5/5b74a0cb.mp3" length="7444733" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>466</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short legal field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can use preferred equity investments as a drafted waterfall priority in a Regulation D private placement, rather than treating them as a generic yield product.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short legal field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can use preferred equity investments as a drafted waterfall priority in a Regulation D private placement, rather than treating them as a generic yield product.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/68fd1ea5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oil Rig Fund Structure in a Regulation D Private Placement</title>
      <itunes:title>Oil Rig Fund Structure in a Regulation D Private Placement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2211f40-d12e-48eb-9804-b80c96926a6f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ba2794d3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains the legal architecture of an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement. Tilden breaks down the importance of establishing a liability firewall between operational risk and passive investor capital, the role of operating agreement drafting in supporting potential tax pass-through treatment for items like Intangible Drilling Costs (IDCs), and the practical marketing differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). Finally, he explains how paying transaction-based finder's fees for investor introductions may raise broker-dealer registration issues.<p>Also see: Oil Rig Fund Structure: Liability, Tax, Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains the legal architecture of an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement. Tilden breaks down the importance of establishing a liability firewall between operational risk and passive investor capital, the role of operating agreement drafting in supporting potential tax pass-through treatment for items like Intangible Drilling Costs (IDCs), and the practical marketing differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). Finally, he explains how paying transaction-based finder's fees for investor introductions may raise broker-dealer registration issues.<p>Also see: Oil Rig Fund Structure: Liability, Tax, Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:36:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ba2794d3/cbb9662d.mp3" length="8829013" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>552</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains why an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement requires separating drilling risk from passive investor capital.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains why an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement requires separating dri</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ba2794d3/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finder’s Fees in Regulation D Private Placements: Who Needs the License?</title>
      <itunes:title>Finder’s Fees in Regulation D Private Placements: Who Needs the License?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c8d8f5f-0dda-4624-b078-2c76b2f1ac53</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a1d8ae1d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we address a common sponsor question: do you need a license to pay finder’s fees for investor introductions? The reality is that there is no payer’s license. Instead, the focus is on whether the recipient of transaction-based compensation is properly registered. Tilden explains how success-based pay in a Regulation D private placement may raise broker-dealer registration issues, why a real estate license is not a substitute, and the steps to verify registered placement agents before any money changes hands.</p><p>Also see: No License to Pay Finder’s Fees in a Reg D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we address a common sponsor question: do you need a license to pay finder’s fees for investor introductions? The reality is that there is no payer’s license. Instead, the focus is on whether the recipient of transaction-based compensation is properly registered. Tilden explains how success-based pay in a Regulation D private placement may raise broker-dealer registration issues, why a real estate license is not a substitute, and the steps to verify registered placement agents before any money changes hands.</p><p>Also see: No License to Pay Finder’s Fees in a Reg D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 18:09:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a1d8ae1d/e7a212f5.mp3" length="7818388" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>489</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why paying finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D private placement can move a capital raise into broker-dealer registration territory.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why paying finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D private placement can move a capital raise into broker-dealer registration territory.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a1d8ae1d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
