<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/syndication-attorney-field-notes-with-tilden-moschetti" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>Syndication Attorney Field Notes with Tilden Moschetti</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/syndication-attorney-field-notes-with-tilden-moschetti</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Syndication Attorney Field Notes is a short-form educational podcast from Tilden Moschetti for sponsors, real estate syndicators, fund managers, and business owners raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

Each episode breaks down one issue from the legal notebook: finder’s fees, broker-dealer registration, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), investor verification, private placement memorandums, subscription agreements, Form D, Blue Sky filings, fund structure, and the mistakes that show up before the documents are drafted.

Plain-English field notes. One issue, one misconception, one practical takeaway. Public education only, not legal advice.</description>
    <copyright>(c) 2026 Moschetti Syndication Law PLLC</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>eff38f4a-d144-50f5-a2d8-5d4ed05193c8</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:25:04 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:25:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <link>http://www.moschettilaw.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Investing"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Vlo6w6HOYP2nCJsHx-PBcKPPB3KWyQ02YaaaIxptINk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jMTY1/Nzc5M2I2NTYzMDYw/MWI5MDRkNzM5NDdm/MjRjMC5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Syndication Attorney Field Notes is a short-form educational podcast from Tilden Moschetti for sponsors, real estate syndicators, fund managers, and business owners raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

Each episode breaks down one issue from the legal notebook: finder’s fees, broker-dealer registration, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), investor verification, private placement memorandums, subscription agreements, Form D, Blue Sky filings, fund structure, and the mistakes that show up before the documents are drafted.

Plain-English field notes. One issue, one misconception, one practical takeaway. Public education only, not legal advice.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Syndication Attorney Field Notes is a short-form educational podcast from Tilden Moschetti for sponsors, real estate syndicators, fund managers, and business owners raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>info@moschettilaw.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Why Your Blind-Pool Mandate Isn't Just Marketing</title>
      <itunes:title>Why Your Blind-Pool Mandate Isn't Just Marketing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">606f0f61-eb83-497d-b1e6-431afd65912b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ca07b3a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When launching a blind-pool fund, the investment mandate is often written to sell a vision to potential investors. But once that language is in your Private Placement Memorandum and Operating Agreement, it becomes a strict legal boundary. In this episode of Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the tension between drafting a mandate that is too narrow—which can cause you to miss great opportunities—and one that is too broad, which can make it difficult to raise capital. Learn how to structure your fund documents with deliberate exceptions that provide operational flexibility while maintaining investor trust.<p>Also see: What Is an Investment Mandate in a Blind-Pool Fund? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-an-investment-mandate-in-a-blind-pool-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-an-investment-mandate-in-a-blind-pool-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/e9olpVpnCvs">https://youtu.be/e9olpVpnCvs</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When launching a blind-pool fund, the investment mandate is often written to sell a vision to potential investors. But once that language is in your Private Placement Memorandum and Operating Agreement, it becomes a strict legal boundary. In this episode of Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the tension between drafting a mandate that is too narrow—which can cause you to miss great opportunities—and one that is too broad, which can make it difficult to raise capital. Learn how to structure your fund documents with deliberate exceptions that provide operational flexibility while maintaining investor trust.<p>Also see: What Is an Investment Mandate in a Blind-Pool Fund? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-an-investment-mandate-in-a-blind-pool-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-an-investment-mandate-in-a-blind-pool-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/e9olpVpnCvs">https://youtu.be/e9olpVpnCvs</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:25:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6ca07b3a/f51a7371.mp3" length="5314782" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9olpVpnCvs">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>358</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often treat blind-pool investment mandates as pitch deck slogans to attract capital. In reality, they are strict legal boundaries. Here is how to draft a mandate that comforts investors without trapping you as an operator.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often treat blind-pool investment mandates as pitch deck slogans to attract capital. In reality, they are strict legal boundaries. Here is how to draft a mandate that comforts investors without trapping you as an operator.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ca07b3a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ca07b3a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Shortfall Problem: Cumulative vs. Non-Cumulative Preferred Returns</title>
      <itunes:title>The Shortfall Problem: Cumulative vs. Non-Cumulative Preferred Returns</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7e06afe-375e-4706-bc7e-c42e84003223</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/11bc47d2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What happens to an investor's preferred return when a fund has a lean year? In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti clears up the pervasive confusion surrounding cumulative and non-cumulative preferred returns. Sponsors often assume cumulative structures act as dangerous compounding debt, while non-cumulative structures offer complete payment discretion. Both assumptions miss the mark. Tilden walks through a practical hypothetical to explain how shortfalls carry forward, why a priority position is not a promissory note, and the true meaning of non-cumulative forfeiture. Learn how to align your operating agreement's waterfall language with your actual cash flow and investor expectations.<p>Also see: Cumulative vs. Non-Cumulative Preferred Returns in Private Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-vs-non-cumulative-preferred-returns-in-private-offerings/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-vs-non-cumulative-preferred-returns-in-private-offerings/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/47VK9KxDZho">https://youtu.be/47VK9KxDZho</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What happens to an investor's preferred return when a fund has a lean year? In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti clears up the pervasive confusion surrounding cumulative and non-cumulative preferred returns. Sponsors often assume cumulative structures act as dangerous compounding debt, while non-cumulative structures offer complete payment discretion. Both assumptions miss the mark. Tilden walks through a practical hypothetical to explain how shortfalls carry forward, why a priority position is not a promissory note, and the true meaning of non-cumulative forfeiture. Learn how to align your operating agreement's waterfall language with your actual cash flow and investor expectations.<p>Also see: Cumulative vs. Non-Cumulative Preferred Returns in Private Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-vs-non-cumulative-preferred-returns-in-private-offerings/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-vs-non-cumulative-preferred-returns-in-private-offerings/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/47VK9KxDZho">https://youtu.be/47VK9KxDZho</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:24:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/11bc47d2/f1a1800d.mp3" length="5543406" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47VK9KxDZho">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>374</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti clarifies the mechanics of unpaid preferred returns during a bad cash flow year, breaking down the critical differences between cumulative and non-cumulative structures.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti clarifies the mechanics of unpaid preferred returns during a bad cash flow year, breaking down the critical differences between cumulative and non-cumulative structures.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/11bc47d2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/11bc47d2/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Calculating Preferred Returns: Contributed vs. Unreturned Capital</title>
      <itunes:title>Calculating Preferred Returns: Contributed vs. Unreturned Capital</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">252b69fd-7978-4a8d-b134-ff82835d36a7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/65cc71df</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When syndicators return capital to investors after a refinance, many assume their ongoing preferred return payments will drop automatically. This episode explores why that assumption can create an unexpected cash flow mismatch, and how to prevent it.

Key Takeaways:
- The crucial difference between calculating returns on "contributed capital" versus "unreturned capital."
- How a mismatch between a sponsor's financial model and their operating agreement causes cash flow shortfalls.
- Why capital calls and staged funding require careful tracking of when capital is actually contributed.
- A reminder that a preferred return is an equity distribution priority, not a guaranteed debt.

This podcast is for public education and does not constitute legal advice.<p>Also see: Preferred Return Calculation: Contributed Capital vs. Unreturned Capital — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-return-calculation-contributed-capital-vs-unreturned-capital/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-return-calculation-contributed-capital-vs-unreturned-capital/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Enjk9ZZlZrU">https://youtu.be/Enjk9ZZlZrU</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When syndicators return capital to investors after a refinance, many assume their ongoing preferred return payments will drop automatically. This episode explores why that assumption can create an unexpected cash flow mismatch, and how to prevent it.

Key Takeaways:
- The crucial difference between calculating returns on "contributed capital" versus "unreturned capital."
- How a mismatch between a sponsor's financial model and their operating agreement causes cash flow shortfalls.
- Why capital calls and staged funding require careful tracking of when capital is actually contributed.
- A reminder that a preferred return is an equity distribution priority, not a guaranteed debt.

This podcast is for public education and does not constitute legal advice.<p>Also see: Preferred Return Calculation: Contributed Capital vs. Unreturned Capital — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-return-calculation-contributed-capital-vs-unreturned-capital/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-return-calculation-contributed-capital-vs-unreturned-capital/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Enjk9ZZlZrU">https://youtu.be/Enjk9ZZlZrU</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:28:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/65cc71df/367ca4c0.mp3" length="5720551" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Enjk9ZZlZrU">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>387</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When syndicators return capital to investors after a refinance, many assume their ongoing preferred return payments will drop automatically. This field note explains why that assumption can create an unexpected cash flow mismatch.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When syndicators return capital to investors after a refinance, many assume their ongoing preferred return payments will drop automatically. This field note explains why that assumption can create an unexpected cash flow mismatch.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/65cc71df/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/65cc71df/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred Equity vs. Mezzanine Debt: Reading the Remedies</title>
      <itunes:title>Preferred Equity vs. Mezzanine Debt: Reading the Remedies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">560d8dfd-319d-4b48-a6cd-7b07fc05ab51</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/06121178</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When filling a multi-million dollar gap in a syndication capital stack, sponsors often assume that preferred equity is inherently safer than mezzanine debt because it acts as a partnership interest rather than a loan. However, relying on the label at the top of the term sheet can create unforeseen vulnerabilities. 

In this episode, we unpack the functional similarities between these two financing instruments when a deal goes sideways. We cover how a spring-in right can effectively turn preferred equity into mezzanine debt in a different outfit, leading to a complete loss of managerial control for the sponsor. We also discuss why the senior lender ultimately dictates the shape of your capital stack, and how a syndication attorney ensures your PPM disclosures align with the actual control remedies rather than just the name of the financial instrument.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity vs. Mezzanine Debt in a Real Estate Capital Stack — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-vs-mezzanine-debt-in-a-real-estate-capital-stack/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-vs-mezzanine-debt-in-a-real-estate-capital-stack/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/NOvYeC0q2F8">https://youtu.be/NOvYeC0q2F8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When filling a multi-million dollar gap in a syndication capital stack, sponsors often assume that preferred equity is inherently safer than mezzanine debt because it acts as a partnership interest rather than a loan. However, relying on the label at the top of the term sheet can create unforeseen vulnerabilities. 

In this episode, we unpack the functional similarities between these two financing instruments when a deal goes sideways. We cover how a spring-in right can effectively turn preferred equity into mezzanine debt in a different outfit, leading to a complete loss of managerial control for the sponsor. We also discuss why the senior lender ultimately dictates the shape of your capital stack, and how a syndication attorney ensures your PPM disclosures align with the actual control remedies rather than just the name of the financial instrument.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity vs. Mezzanine Debt in a Real Estate Capital Stack — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-vs-mezzanine-debt-in-a-real-estate-capital-stack/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-vs-mezzanine-debt-in-a-real-estate-capital-stack/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/NOvYeC0q2F8">https://youtu.be/NOvYeC0q2F8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:28:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/06121178/39130fd8.mp3" length="6306512" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOvYeC0q2F8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>429</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume preferred equity is safer than mezzanine debt because it isn't labeled as a loan. We explore why the actual remedies—like spring-in management rights—matter far more than the title on the term sheet.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume preferred equity is safer than mezzanine debt because it isn't labeled as a loan. We explore why the actual remedies—like spring-in management rights—matter far more than the title on the term sheet.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/06121178/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/06121178/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When a Hard Money Lender Becomes a Debt Fund</title>
      <itunes:title>When a Hard Money Lender Becomes a Debt Fund</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7419ed7f-c2c3-45a1-8d10-5fba11f17920</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ce36cd5a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When a hard money lender starts taking outside capital to fund deals, they cross an invisible line from being just a lender to becoming a securities issuer. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the core structural shift between lending your own money and managing a debt fund under Regulation D. We discuss why using your existing balance-sheet LLC for pooled capital can create unnecessary legal exposure, how to build the "investor-facing" side of your fund, and the practical differences between deal-by-deal participation and a pooled fund model.<p>Also see: Hard-Money Lending Business vs. Debt Fund: When Investor Capital Changes the Structure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/hard-money-lending-business-vs-debt-fund-when-investor-capital-changes-the-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/hard-money-lending-business-vs-debt-fund-when-investor-capital-changes-the-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/X1trFD-EQsY">https://youtu.be/X1trFD-EQsY</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When a hard money lender starts taking outside capital to fund deals, they cross an invisible line from being just a lender to becoming a securities issuer. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the core structural shift between lending your own money and managing a debt fund under Regulation D. We discuss why using your existing balance-sheet LLC for pooled capital can create unnecessary legal exposure, how to build the "investor-facing" side of your fund, and the practical differences between deal-by-deal participation and a pooled fund model.<p>Also see: Hard-Money Lending Business vs. Debt Fund: When Investor Capital Changes the Structure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/hard-money-lending-business-vs-debt-fund-when-investor-capital-changes-the-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/hard-money-lending-business-vs-debt-fund-when-investor-capital-changes-the-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/X1trFD-EQsY">https://youtu.be/X1trFD-EQsY</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:27:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ce36cd5a/09670dac.mp3" length="5842005" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1trFD-EQsY">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>396</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When a successful hard money lender starts taking outside capital, they cross an invisible line from lender to securities issuer. In this field note, we explore why pooling investor funds requires a completely different legal structure, even if the loans stay exactly the same.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When a successful hard money lender starts taking outside capital, they cross an invisible line from lender to securities issuer. In this field note, we explore why pooling investor funds requires a completely different legal structure, even if the loans </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ce36cd5a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ce36cd5a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What a PPM Sample Actually Tells You</title>
      <itunes:title>What a PPM Sample Actually Tells You</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77a67469-db7f-4171-bb13-3efbd901ecf6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c811ca35</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[First-time sponsors naturally want to review a sample Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to understand what they are handing to investors under Regulation D. While reviewing samples is a great way to learn the structure of an offering document, assuming a downloaded sample is a fill-in-the-blank form can create serious disclosure issues. In this episode, we cover the legitimate educational uses of a sample PPM and explain why copying and pasting risk factors and distribution structures from another deal often leads to contradictory governing documents. A syndication attorney relies on your specific Operating Agreement to build a PPM—learn why starting from a stranger's document is a liability rather than a shortcut.<p>Also see: What a PPM Sample Can—and Cannot—Tell You — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-a-ppm-sample-can-and-cannot-tell-you/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-a-ppm-sample-can-and-cannot-tell-you/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KYcjdnWgJ6U">https://youtu.be/KYcjdnWgJ6U</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[First-time sponsors naturally want to review a sample Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to understand what they are handing to investors under Regulation D. While reviewing samples is a great way to learn the structure of an offering document, assuming a downloaded sample is a fill-in-the-blank form can create serious disclosure issues. In this episode, we cover the legitimate educational uses of a sample PPM and explain why copying and pasting risk factors and distribution structures from another deal often leads to contradictory governing documents. A syndication attorney relies on your specific Operating Agreement to build a PPM—learn why starting from a stranger's document is a liability rather than a shortcut.<p>Also see: What a PPM Sample Can—and Cannot—Tell You — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-a-ppm-sample-can-and-cannot-tell-you/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-a-ppm-sample-can-and-cannot-tell-you/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KYcjdnWgJ6U">https://youtu.be/KYcjdnWgJ6U</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:26:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c811ca35/48f38580.mp3" length="5093461" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYcjdnWgJ6U">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>342</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Looking at a sample Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is a great way to understand the structure of an offering, but treating it like a fill-in-the-blank template can create disclosure issues for your syndication.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Looking at a sample Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is a great way to understand the structure of an offering, but treating it like a fill-in-the-blank template can create disclosure issues for your syndication.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c811ca35/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c811ca35/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why 'Managing Partner' Isn't a Real LLC Title</title>
      <itunes:title>Why 'Managing Partner' Isn't a Real LLC Title</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b6a09994-f0ed-4d8e-9b44-2be56b622d2e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f5c8e852</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Using the title 'Managing Partner' on a pitch deck is a common habit for real estate sponsors, but dropping that title into an LLC structure can create unexpected friction at the closing table. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti unpacks the confusion between entity types and explains where your legal authority actually comes from. We break down the functional differences between a Manager, a Managing Member, and a Managing Partner, and share why matching your signature to your Operating Agreement is the key to a smooth close.<p>Also see: Managing Member vs. Manager vs. Managing Partner in an LLC — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/managing-member-vs-manager-vs-managing-partner-in-an-llc/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/managing-member-vs-manager-vs-managing-partner-in-an-llc/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/4xbQF4OGeYk">https://youtu.be/4xbQF4OGeYk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Using the title 'Managing Partner' on a pitch deck is a common habit for real estate sponsors, but dropping that title into an LLC structure can create unexpected friction at the closing table. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti unpacks the confusion between entity types and explains where your legal authority actually comes from. We break down the functional differences between a Manager, a Managing Member, and a Managing Partner, and share why matching your signature to your Operating Agreement is the key to a smooth close.<p>Also see: Managing Member vs. Manager vs. Managing Partner in an LLC — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/managing-member-vs-manager-vs-managing-partner-in-an-llc/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/managing-member-vs-manager-vs-managing-partner-in-an-llc/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/4xbQF4OGeYk">https://youtu.be/4xbQF4OGeYk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:27:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f5c8e852/a52e2f2c.mp3" length="5022824" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xbQF4OGeYk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>337</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Choosing a title like 'Managing Partner' for your real estate fund might look great on a pitch deck, but it can create unnecessary friction at closing. In this field note, we explore why an LLC structure doesn't support partnership titles and how to properly align your authority with your operating agreement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Choosing a title like 'Managing Partner' for your real estate fund might look great on a pitch deck, but it can create unnecessary friction at closing. In this field note, we explore why an LLC structure doesn't support partnership titles and how to prope</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f5c8e852/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f5c8e852/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fund Launch Sequence: From Economics to First Close</title>
      <itunes:title>The Fund Launch Sequence: From Economics to First Close</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e923844-58c7-4960-8934-c07906fae90d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8465f9de</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The practical sequence for launching a private fund under Regulation D is frequently misunderstood. Sponsors often assume the process begins with forming an LLC and filing a Form D to secure SEC permission. In this field note, we unpack why that assumption can create unnecessary administrative burdens. We walk through the proper fund launch sequence, starting with core economic decisions, moving through document drafting and entity formation, and concluding with the mechanics of the first close. We also clarify exactly when a sale is legally finalized and what triggers the 15-day Form D filing window.<p>Also see: Fund Launch Sequence: Entity, Documents, First Close, and Filings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-launch-sequence-entity-documents-first-close-and-filings/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-launch-sequence-entity-documents-first-close-and-filings/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bhws3rzV52U">https://youtu.be/bhws3rzV52U</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The practical sequence for launching a private fund under Regulation D is frequently misunderstood. Sponsors often assume the process begins with forming an LLC and filing a Form D to secure SEC permission. In this field note, we unpack why that assumption can create unnecessary administrative burdens. We walk through the proper fund launch sequence, starting with core economic decisions, moving through document drafting and entity formation, and concluding with the mechanics of the first close. We also clarify exactly when a sale is legally finalized and what triggers the 15-day Form D filing window.<p>Also see: Fund Launch Sequence: Entity, Documents, First Close, and Filings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-launch-sequence-entity-documents-first-close-and-filings/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-launch-sequence-entity-documents-first-close-and-filings/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bhws3rzV52U">https://youtu.be/bhws3rzV52U</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 13:26:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8465f9de/7c5d99c2.mp3" length="5560364" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhws3rzV52U">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>376</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume launching a private fund starts with forming an LLC and asking the SEC for permission. In this field note, we break down the practical sequence of a Regulation D offering—from deciding the economics to triggering the 15-day Form D filing clock.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume launching a private fund starts with forming an LLC and asking the SEC for permission. In this field note, we break down the practical sequence of a Regulation D offering—from deciding the economics to triggering the 15-day Form D fi</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8465f9de/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8465f9de/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debt vs. Equity Securities: Priority, Control, and Cash Flow</title>
      <itunes:title>Debt vs. Equity Securities: Priority, Control, and Cash Flow</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d0121de6-5190-49e0-a0aa-e3341588f382</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/27583186</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Choosing between debt and equity in a private capital raise is often driven by what sounds easiest to pitch. Sponsors frequently issue promissory notes just because investors like the sound of guaranteed interest. In this field note, we break down the practical differences between offering debt and offering equity, focusing on priority, control, and what happens to your deal during a slow month.

We explore the strict legal reality of mandatory obligations and hard maturity dates, and compare it to the operational flexibility of shared-risk equity. Through a clear hypothetical, you'll see why matching your legal structure to your actual cash flow is the best way to avoid accidentally handing control over to your investors.

This podcast is for public education and does not constitute legal advice.<p>Also see: Debt Securities vs. Equity Securities in a Private Capital Raise — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-securities-vs-equity-securities-in-a-private-capital-raise/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-securities-vs-equity-securities-in-a-private-capital-raise/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/xxMbKMfd54Y">https://youtu.be/xxMbKMfd54Y</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Choosing between debt and equity in a private capital raise is often driven by what sounds easiest to pitch. Sponsors frequently issue promissory notes just because investors like the sound of guaranteed interest. In this field note, we break down the practical differences between offering debt and offering equity, focusing on priority, control, and what happens to your deal during a slow month.

We explore the strict legal reality of mandatory obligations and hard maturity dates, and compare it to the operational flexibility of shared-risk equity. Through a clear hypothetical, you'll see why matching your legal structure to your actual cash flow is the best way to avoid accidentally handing control over to your investors.

This podcast is for public education and does not constitute legal advice.<p>Also see: Debt Securities vs. Equity Securities in a Private Capital Raise — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-securities-vs-equity-securities-in-a-private-capital-raise/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-securities-vs-equity-securities-in-a-private-capital-raise/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/xxMbKMfd54Y">https://youtu.be/xxMbKMfd54Y</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:06:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/27583186/c9786aa0.mp3" length="5712039" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxMbKMfd54Y">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>387</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Choosing between debt and equity in a private capital raise is often driven by what sounds easier to pitch. In this field note, we explore why matching your legal structure to your actual cash flow matters more than the label on the document.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Choosing between debt and equity in a private capital raise is often driven by what sounds easier to pitch. In this field note, we explore why matching your legal structure to your actual cash flow matters more than the label on the document.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/27583186/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/27583186/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Admin Trap of Setting Your Minimum Investment</title>
      <itunes:title>The Admin Trap of Setting Your Minimum Investment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f57627d-a477-438b-9a40-46f075d4d1e1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ac93417e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Setting the minimum investment for a private fund or syndication is often treated as a marketing strategy. Many sponsors assume a lower barrier to entry means a faster capital raise. In reality, lowering your minimum can create a heavy, long-term back-office burden. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the administrative trap of low minimums, comparing the real-world impact of a $25k versus $100k threshold. Learn how to calculate a minimum investment that protects your time, the difference between your business requirements and legal accreditation, and how to properly structure your offering documents to retain the discretion to accept smaller checks from the right investors.<p>Also see: How to Set the Minimum Investment for a Syndication or Private Fund — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-set-the-minimum-investment-for-a-syndication-or-private-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-set-the-minimum-investment-for-a-syndication-or-private-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Kqp-HUvqJCk">https://youtu.be/Kqp-HUvqJCk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Setting the minimum investment for a private fund or syndication is often treated as a marketing strategy. Many sponsors assume a lower barrier to entry means a faster capital raise. In reality, lowering your minimum can create a heavy, long-term back-office burden. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the administrative trap of low minimums, comparing the real-world impact of a $25k versus $100k threshold. Learn how to calculate a minimum investment that protects your time, the difference between your business requirements and legal accreditation, and how to properly structure your offering documents to retain the discretion to accept smaller checks from the right investors.<p>Also see: How to Set the Minimum Investment for a Syndication or Private Fund — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-set-the-minimum-investment-for-a-syndication-or-private-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-set-the-minimum-investment-for-a-syndication-or-private-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Kqp-HUvqJCk">https://youtu.be/Kqp-HUvqJCk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:54:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ac93417e/05a4f6ad.mp3" length="5961902" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kqp-HUvqJCk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume that lowering their minimum investment will make raising capital easier. In this field note, we break down why a low minimum is actually an administrative trap and how to calculate the right number for your fund's back office.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume that lowering their minimum investment will make raising capital easier. In this field note, we break down why a low minimum is actually an administrative trap and how to calculate the right number for your fund's back office.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ac93417e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ac93417e/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Promissory Note Trap in Capital Raises</title>
      <itunes:title>The Promissory Note Trap in Capital Raises</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ec84edf-3db5-44c6-a9fb-a5734d17f0b3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6a0f9292</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that structuring a capital raise as debt rather than equity bypasses securities laws. If it's a promissory note, it's just a loan, right? In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti examines the core tension between what a document is called and its actual economic reality. We break down the differences between ordinary commercial borrowing and investment debt, illustrating how passive reliance on a sponsor's efforts typically creates an investment contract. Listen in to learn why the label on the paper doesn't change your regulatory requirements, and how to calmly and properly structure a private placement debt offering using a Regulation D exemption.<p>Also see: Private Placement Debt: When a Promissory Note Is a Security — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-debt-when-a-promissory-note-is-a-security/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-debt-when-a-promissory-note-is-a-security/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/QQg49FLFQ5c">https://youtu.be/QQg49FLFQ5c</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that structuring a capital raise as debt rather than equity bypasses securities laws. If it's a promissory note, it's just a loan, right? In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti examines the core tension between what a document is called and its actual economic reality. We break down the differences between ordinary commercial borrowing and investment debt, illustrating how passive reliance on a sponsor's efforts typically creates an investment contract. Listen in to learn why the label on the paper doesn't change your regulatory requirements, and how to calmly and properly structure a private placement debt offering using a Regulation D exemption.<p>Also see: Private Placement Debt: When a Promissory Note Is a Security — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-debt-when-a-promissory-note-is-a-security/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-debt-when-a-promissory-note-is-a-security/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/QQg49FLFQ5c">https://youtu.be/QQg49FLFQ5c</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:53:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6a0f9292/a7008739.mp3" length="5133793" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQg49FLFQ5c">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>345</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume that structuring a capital raise as debt rather than equity bypasses securities laws. This episode explores why labeling an investment as a promissory note doesn't necessarily remove it from SEC oversight.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume that structuring a capital raise as debt rather than equity bypasses securities laws. This episode explores why labeling an investment as a promissory note doesn't necessarily remove it from SEC oversight.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6a0f9292/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6a0f9292/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Sequence from Soft Commitment to Funded Capital</title>
      <itunes:title>The Sequence from Soft Commitment to Funded Capital</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b082fb49-3782-4175-b702-5c856c50984e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/342f3b62</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When gathering soft commitments for a Regulation D syndication, sponsors often look at an email or a verbal pledge and assume the capital is secure. But building rigid funds around soft numbers can create significant operational hurdles when some of those pledges inevitably fall away. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the four distinct phases of investor commitment: indication of interest, soft commitment, signed subscription agreement, and funded capital. Learn how to use soft commitments correctly as a demand-testing tool, structure your private placement memorandum with flexible minimum and maximum ranges, and stress-test your fund to ensure it remains viable even if half of your early interest fails to materialize.<p>Also see: Soft Commitments Before a Fund Launch: What Sponsors Can Rely On — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/soft-commitments-before-a-fund-launch-what-sponsors-can-rely-on/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/soft-commitments-before-a-fund-launch-what-sponsors-can-rely-on/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/xuEDErugFmU">https://youtu.be/xuEDErugFmU</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When gathering soft commitments for a Regulation D syndication, sponsors often look at an email or a verbal pledge and assume the capital is secure. But building rigid funds around soft numbers can create significant operational hurdles when some of those pledges inevitably fall away. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the four distinct phases of investor commitment: indication of interest, soft commitment, signed subscription agreement, and funded capital. Learn how to use soft commitments correctly as a demand-testing tool, structure your private placement memorandum with flexible minimum and maximum ranges, and stress-test your fund to ensure it remains viable even if half of your early interest fails to materialize.<p>Also see: Soft Commitments Before a Fund Launch: What Sponsors Can Rely On — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/soft-commitments-before-a-fund-launch-what-sponsors-can-rely-on/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/soft-commitments-before-a-fund-launch-what-sponsors-can-rely-on/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/xuEDErugFmU">https://youtu.be/xuEDErugFmU</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:53:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/342f3b62/3063eb01.mp3" length="5356039" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuEDErugFmU">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>361</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often treat an investor’s soft commitment like money in the bank. This episode breaks down the sequence from casual interest to funded capital, explaining why building rigid funds around soft numbers can create serious operational hurdles.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often treat an investor’s soft commitment like money in the bank. This episode breaks down the sequence from casual interest to funded capital, explaining why building rigid funds around soft numbers can create serious operational hurdles.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/342f3b62/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/342f3b62/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a Blind Pool Fund Isn't Just a Syndication Without an Address</title>
      <itunes:title>Why a Blind Pool Fund Isn't Just a Syndication Without an Address</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e998d5d-24b7-4f62-a7cb-f53bc62427b8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8417c2e1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume a blind pool fund is just a normal syndication with a 'to be determined' property address. This episode explores why you can't simply take an old Private Placement Memorandum and hit delete on the location. When there is no specific asset to underwrite, investors are underwriting your judgment. We walk through how to build an investment mandate that balances operational flexibility with investor confidence. We also look at managing deployment risk, disclosing conflicts of interest, and why structuring a blind pool fund requires a different approach with your syndication attorney. Listen in for practical steps on organizing your investment mandate before taking in investor capital.<p>Also see: What Is a Blind Pool Fund? Structure, Risks, and Disclosure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-blind-pool-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-blind-pool-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Av4z7FUI0jA">https://youtu.be/Av4z7FUI0jA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume a blind pool fund is just a normal syndication with a 'to be determined' property address. This episode explores why you can't simply take an old Private Placement Memorandum and hit delete on the location. When there is no specific asset to underwrite, investors are underwriting your judgment. We walk through how to build an investment mandate that balances operational flexibility with investor confidence. We also look at managing deployment risk, disclosing conflicts of interest, and why structuring a blind pool fund requires a different approach with your syndication attorney. Listen in for practical steps on organizing your investment mandate before taking in investor capital.<p>Also see: What Is a Blind Pool Fund? Structure, Risks, and Disclosure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-blind-pool-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-blind-pool-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Av4z7FUI0jA">https://youtu.be/Av4z7FUI0jA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:04:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8417c2e1/b0f8dacd.mp3" length="7332753" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av4z7FUI0jA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>502</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume a blind pool fund is just a standard syndication with a 'to be determined' property address. Tilden Moschetti unpacks why this assumption fails and how shifting from an asset-focus to manager discretion changes everything.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume a blind pool fund is just a standard syndication with a 'to be determined' property address. Tilden Moschetti unpacks why this assumption fails and how shifting from an asset-focus to manager discretion changes everything.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8417c2e1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8417c2e1/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Person Clauses: Suspension vs. Dissolution</title>
      <itunes:title>Key Person Clauses: Suspension vs. Dissolution</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">217fe503-c7bf-4a38-bfbe-2ee482f99a9c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c76ff3cc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti examines the mechanics of the Key Person clause in a private fund. Sponsors often confuse this provision with manager removal or treat it as boilerplate death-and-disability language. This episode clarifies the core tension: a Key Person clause isn't about punishing wrongdoing; it’s about continuity when a principal can no longer devote the required time to the fund. Listen to learn how a well-structured clause suspends new capital calls, protects existing assets, and outlines a clear cure period for replacement and investor consent, preventing premature dissolution.</p><p>Also see: Key Person Clauses in Private Funds and Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/key-person-clauses-in-private-funds-and-syndications/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/key-person-clauses-in-private-funds-and-syndications/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/kFmShbO1oM4">https://youtu.be/kFmShbO1oM4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti examines the mechanics of the Key Person clause in a private fund. Sponsors often confuse this provision with manager removal or treat it as boilerplate death-and-disability language. This episode clarifies the core tension: a Key Person clause isn't about punishing wrongdoing; it’s about continuity when a principal can no longer devote the required time to the fund. Listen to learn how a well-structured clause suspends new capital calls, protects existing assets, and outlines a clear cure period for replacement and investor consent, preventing premature dissolution.</p><p>Also see: Key Person Clauses in Private Funds and Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/key-person-clauses-in-private-funds-and-syndications/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/key-person-clauses-in-private-funds-and-syndications/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/kFmShbO1oM4">https://youtu.be/kFmShbO1oM4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:55:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c76ff3cc/c04e89c5.mp3" length="6333330" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFmShbO1oM4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>431</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A field note on how a Key Person clause actually functions inside a private fund, why it isn't a manager removal tool, and how to use it to pause—rather than destroy—a fund when life happens.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A field note on how a Key Person clause actually functions inside a private fund, why it isn't a manager removal tool, and how to use it to pause—rather than destroy—a fund when life happens.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c76ff3cc/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c76ff3cc/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cumulative vs. Compounding Preferred Returns</title>
      <itunes:title>Cumulative vs. Compounding Preferred Returns</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de4c1469-36b4-41e3-95a8-35b08357dcb7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/74aab231</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sponsors often use the terms 'cumulative' and 'compounding' interchangeably when discussing missed distributions with investors. But in a syndication Operating Agreement, mixing up these words has real economic consequences. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how unpaid preferred returns carry forward. We use a whiteboard hypothetical to contrast cumulative addition with compounding growth, illustrating how compounding can quietly eat a sponsor's upside after a few cash-lean years. You'll also hear why preferred returns dictate the waterfall priority of payment, rather than acting as a debt obligation. Check your pitch deck and LPA to ensure you are only promising what you intend to deliver.</p><p>Also see: Cumulative Preferred Return vs. Compounding Preferred Return — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-preferred-return-vs-compounding-preferred-return/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-preferred-return-vs-compounding-preferred-return/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/oBeFeXomRpo">https://youtu.be/oBeFeXomRpo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sponsors often use the terms 'cumulative' and 'compounding' interchangeably when discussing missed distributions with investors. But in a syndication Operating Agreement, mixing up these words has real economic consequences. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how unpaid preferred returns carry forward. We use a whiteboard hypothetical to contrast cumulative addition with compounding growth, illustrating how compounding can quietly eat a sponsor's upside after a few cash-lean years. You'll also hear why preferred returns dictate the waterfall priority of payment, rather than acting as a debt obligation. Check your pitch deck and LPA to ensure you are only promising what you intend to deliver.</p><p>Also see: Cumulative Preferred Return vs. Compounding Preferred Return — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-preferred-return-vs-compounding-preferred-return/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/cumulative-preferred-return-vs-compounding-preferred-return/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/oBeFeXomRpo">https://youtu.be/oBeFeXomRpo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:23:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/74aab231/4d7d9b3e.mp3" length="5632823" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBeFeXomRpo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>381</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A field note on the crucial difference between cumulative and compounding preferred returns, and why confusing the two can quietly erode a sponsor's promote during cash-lean years.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A field note on the crucial difference between cumulative and compounding preferred returns, and why confusing the two can quietly erode a sponsor's promote during cash-lean years.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/74aab231/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/74aab231/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dissecting the Fund Manager Compensation Stack</title>
      <itunes:title>Dissecting the Fund Manager Compensation Stack</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac6ab100-8e4e-49d5-9a46-2b07fdefeb8b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/630f3c48</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring fund manager compensation in a Regulation D syndication goes beyond adopting a standard "2 and 20" template. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the fund manager compensation stack into three distinct layers: management fees, carried interest, and expense reimbursements. Discover why blending these distinct financial functions into a single "sponsor fee" can create disclosure confusion and strain investor trust. Learn how to accurately define operational runway, performance upside, and fronted costs in your Private Placement Memorandum and Operating Agreement, ensuring clarity and alignment with your investors from day one.<p>Also see: Fund Manager Compensation: Management Fees, Promotes, and Incentive Allocations — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-manager-compensation/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-manager-compensation/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KtbkeXW5ZoA">https://youtu.be/KtbkeXW5ZoA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring fund manager compensation in a Regulation D syndication goes beyond adopting a standard "2 and 20" template. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the fund manager compensation stack into three distinct layers: management fees, carried interest, and expense reimbursements. Discover why blending these distinct financial functions into a single "sponsor fee" can create disclosure confusion and strain investor trust. Learn how to accurately define operational runway, performance upside, and fronted costs in your Private Placement Memorandum and Operating Agreement, ensuring clarity and alignment with your investors from day one.<p>Also see: Fund Manager Compensation: Management Fees, Promotes, and Incentive Allocations — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-manager-compensation/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-manager-compensation/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KtbkeXW5ZoA">https://youtu.be/KtbkeXW5ZoA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:26:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/630f3c48/a65aa488.mp3" length="6352881" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtbkeXW5ZoA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>432</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Structuring fund manager compensation in a Regulation D syndication goes beyond a standard template. In this episode, we break down the three layers of compensation—management fees, carried interest, and expense reimbursements—and explain why blending them can create disclosure issues.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Structuring fund manager compensation in a Regulation D syndication goes beyond a standard template. In this episode, we break down the three layers of compensation—management fees, carried interest, and expense reimbursements—and explain why blending the</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/630f3c48/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/630f3c48/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why 'Syndicator' Isn't a Legal Title: Roles, Entities, and Fees</title>
      <itunes:title>Why 'Syndicator' Isn't a Legal Title: Roles, Entities, and Fees</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09e810ba-a75e-49c4-b091-a8044d41ccf3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5607172b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a Regulation D syndication requires knowing the difference between business labels and legal entities. Sponsors often assume that the title 'syndicator' automatically grants them legal status, liability protection, or the right to collect fees. In this episode, we explore the core tension between what you call yourself in the market and how your structure is actually drafted. We break down the relationship between the Manager and the Issuer, how compensation is tied to specific documented roles rather than a title, and why your fiduciary duties come from controlling investor capital. Tune in for a practical look at translating your real-world duties into clean, compliant legal documents.<p>Also see: What Is a Syndicator? Roles, Responsibilities, Fees, and Securities Duties — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-syndicator/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-syndicator/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/28q93sLdUSs">https://youtu.be/28q93sLdUSs</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a Regulation D syndication requires knowing the difference between business labels and legal entities. Sponsors often assume that the title 'syndicator' automatically grants them legal status, liability protection, or the right to collect fees. In this episode, we explore the core tension between what you call yourself in the market and how your structure is actually drafted. We break down the relationship between the Manager and the Issuer, how compensation is tied to specific documented roles rather than a title, and why your fiduciary duties come from controlling investor capital. Tune in for a practical look at translating your real-world duties into clean, compliant legal documents.<p>Also see: What Is a Syndicator? Roles, Responsibilities, Fees, and Securities Duties — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-syndicator/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-syndicator/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/28q93sLdUSs">https://youtu.be/28q93sLdUSs</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:03:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5607172b/4d0d52a1.mp3" length="5183567" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28q93sLdUSs">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>349</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, we unpack the common assumption that the title 'syndicator' grants legal status or liability protection, and look at the actual entities and documents that do.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, we unpack the common assumption that the title 'syndicator' grants legal status or liability protection, and look at the actual entities and documents that do.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5607172b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5607172b/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asset vs. Property Management: The Fee Disclosure Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>Asset vs. Property Management: The Fee Disclosure Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">076747e7-71fb-45f0-8d96-5fdaa0c2c0b0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6253e1b0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is common for real estate syndicators to handle both asset management and property management in-house. Because the same team is often doing both jobs, a frequent assumption is that these roles can be bundled into one simple management fee to keep the paperwork clean. However, this approach can create confusing disclosures and box you in down the line. Asset management involves high-level strategy and answering to investors, while property management is about daily operations and managing the physical building. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why blurring these roles in your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Operating Agreement is a mistake. By separating the strategic from the operational, sponsors can provide transparent disclosures, protect their ability to change property managers if needed, and build greater trust with investors. We also explore an important state-law caveat regarding property management licensing.<p>Also see: Asset Management vs Property Management in Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/_RsdbOy4CWg">https://youtu.be/_RsdbOy4CWg</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It is common for real estate syndicators to handle both asset management and property management in-house. Because the same team is often doing both jobs, a frequent assumption is that these roles can be bundled into one simple management fee to keep the paperwork clean. However, this approach can create confusing disclosures and box you in down the line. Asset management involves high-level strategy and answering to investors, while property management is about daily operations and managing the physical building. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why blurring these roles in your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Operating Agreement is a mistake. By separating the strategic from the operational, sponsors can provide transparent disclosures, protect their ability to change property managers if needed, and build greater trust with investors. We also explore an important state-law caveat regarding property management licensing.<p>Also see: Asset Management vs Property Management in Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/_RsdbOy4CWg">https://youtu.be/_RsdbOy4CWg</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 11:58:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6253e1b0/5a8d3f8b.mp3" length="6257726" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RsdbOy4CWg">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>425</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Discover why bundling asset and property management fees in your syndication documents can create muddy disclosures and limit your flexibility. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the crucial difference between the two roles and how to structure your fees cleanly.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Discover why bundling asset and property management fees in your syndication documents can create muddy disclosures and limit your flexibility. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the crucial difference between the two roles and how to structur</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6253e1b0/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6253e1b0/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Danger of Skipping the PPM in Accredited Deals</title>
      <itunes:title>The Danger of Skipping the PPM in Accredited Deals</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26bec46e-fefb-43e3-a339-263e4f0e29e6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/090474a8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume they can save time and money by skipping the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) when raising a Regulation D offering where every investor is accredited. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses this dangerous assumption. He explains why pitch decks and operating agreements cannot replace the legal function of a PPM, and how relying on SEC exemptions can create unnecessary exposure to anti-fraud claims. Learn why a complete, written disclosure record is your baseline defense when a deal faces headwinds.<p>Also see: Why You Need a Private Placement Memorandum in Regulation D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bA-w5JSTnE8">https://youtu.be/bA-w5JSTnE8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume they can save time and money by skipping the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) when raising a Regulation D offering where every investor is accredited. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses this dangerous assumption. He explains why pitch decks and operating agreements cannot replace the legal function of a PPM, and how relying on SEC exemptions can create unnecessary exposure to anti-fraud claims. Learn why a complete, written disclosure record is your baseline defense when a deal faces headwinds.<p>Also see: Why You Need a Private Placement Memorandum in Regulation D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bA-w5JSTnE8">https://youtu.be/bA-w5JSTnE8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 11:58:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/090474a8/5f972e86.mp3" length="5961006" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA-w5JSTnE8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is an unnecessary expense when every investor in their offering is accredited. Tilden Moschetti explains why relying solely on a pitch deck and an operating agreement can leave you exposed if market conditions shift.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is an unnecessary expense when every investor in their offering is accredited. Tilden Moschetti explains why relying solely on a pitch deck and an operating agreement can leave you exposed if mark</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/090474a8/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/090474a8/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring the Sponsor, Issuer, and SPV in Reg D Offerings</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring the Sponsor, Issuer, and SPV in Reg D Offerings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5769b462-f4d4-4bde-a35d-3e9076419d69</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3a1b4fb5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Setting up a three-entity structure in a Regulation D offering is standard practice, but it is not a magic shield against personal liability. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the specific roles of the Sponsor, the Issuer, and the SPV in a syndication deal. He addresses the dangerous assumption that stacking LLCs makes a sponsor untouchable, explaining exactly what this structure protects against (like operational risks and vendor disputes) and what it does not cover (like personal guarantees and bad acts). Listen in to understand why accurate offering documents and good governance are your true safety nets.<p>Also see: Sponsor Entity, Investment Entity &amp; SPVs in Reg D Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/t11k-n6sDhE">https://youtu.be/t11k-n6sDhE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Setting up a three-entity structure in a Regulation D offering is standard practice, but it is not a magic shield against personal liability. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the specific roles of the Sponsor, the Issuer, and the SPV in a syndication deal. He addresses the dangerous assumption that stacking LLCs makes a sponsor untouchable, explaining exactly what this structure protects against (like operational risks and vendor disputes) and what it does not cover (like personal guarantees and bad acts). Listen in to understand why accurate offering documents and good governance are your true safety nets.<p>Also see: Sponsor Entity, Investment Entity &amp; SPVs in Reg D Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/t11k-n6sDhE">https://youtu.be/t11k-n6sDhE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:40:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3a1b4fb5/ab7c5581.mp3" length="5835738" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t11k-n6sDhE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>395</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Setting up a three-entity structure in a Regulation D offering is standard practice, but it's not a magic shield. Learn what the Sponsor, Issuer, and SPV actually protect—and why no amount of LLCs will save you from your own bad acts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Setting up a three-entity structure in a Regulation D offering is standard practice, but it's not a magic shield. Learn what the Sponsor, Issuer, and SPV actually protect—and why no amount of LLCs will save you from your own bad acts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/3a1b4fb5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/3a1b4fb5/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single-Asset vs. Blind Pool: The Real Difference Between Syndications and Funds</title>
      <itunes:title>Single-Asset vs. Blind Pool: The Real Difference Between Syndications and Funds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30a8b418-ff16-4df9-9d72-8de37a93fa66</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7091a314</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The shift from raising capital deal-by-deal to launching a fund is a natural progression for successful sponsors. However, a common assumption is that a blind-pool fund is just a single-asset syndication with the property details deleted from the template. In this field note, we look at the legal and strategic differences between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool fund under Regulation D. We discuss why investors underwrite "math" in one structure and "trust" in the other, how the Private Placement Memorandum and Operating Agreement must adapt to handle mandate risks and manager discretion, and why multi-asset waterfalls require careful planning up front. We also explore the semi-blind pool as a practical middle ground for sponsors looking to build their track record while offering investors something concrete to underwrite.<p>Also see: Fund vs. Syndication: Regulation D Legal Guide for Sponsors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-syndication-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-syndication-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/IeARtjVc2jg">https://youtu.be/IeARtjVc2jg</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The shift from raising capital deal-by-deal to launching a fund is a natural progression for successful sponsors. However, a common assumption is that a blind-pool fund is just a single-asset syndication with the property details deleted from the template. In this field note, we look at the legal and strategic differences between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool fund under Regulation D. We discuss why investors underwrite "math" in one structure and "trust" in the other, how the Private Placement Memorandum and Operating Agreement must adapt to handle mandate risks and manager discretion, and why multi-asset waterfalls require careful planning up front. We also explore the semi-blind pool as a practical middle ground for sponsors looking to build their track record while offering investors something concrete to underwrite.<p>Also see: Fund vs. Syndication: Regulation D Legal Guide for Sponsors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-syndication-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-syndication-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/IeARtjVc2jg">https://youtu.be/IeARtjVc2jg</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:39:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7091a314/67965775.mp3" length="6011982" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeARtjVc2jg">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>408</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When moving from deal-by-deal raises to a fund, many sponsors assume they can just reuse their last PPM and delete the property details. In this field note, we explore why a blind-pool fund requires a fundamentally different legal package than a single-asset syndication.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When moving from deal-by-deal raises to a fund, many sponsors assume they can just reuse their last PPM and delete the property details. In this field note, we explore why a blind-pool fund requires a fundamentally different legal package than a single-as</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7091a314/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7091a314/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Investor Questionnaire as a Sponsor Defense</title>
      <itunes:title>The Investor Questionnaire as a Sponsor Defense</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">399df9f2-9e96-4c30-b68c-22825a68cf50</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a952e0a4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often treat the investor questionnaire as an annoying speed bump between the handshake and the check. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why that paperwork is actually your first line of defense. The episode explores the legal role of the questionnaire under Regulation D, specifically highlighting the danger of using a 506(b) intake process for a 506(c) offering. Discover why a self-certified checked box builds "reasonable belief" in one scenario, but can create compliance issues when active verification is required.<p>Also see: What Is an Investor Questionnaire for Regulation D? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/o1S0EtApsF0">https://youtu.be/o1S0EtApsF0</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often treat the investor questionnaire as an annoying speed bump between the handshake and the check. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why that paperwork is actually your first line of defense. The episode explores the legal role of the questionnaire under Regulation D, specifically highlighting the danger of using a 506(b) intake process for a 506(c) offering. Discover why a self-certified checked box builds "reasonable belief" in one scenario, but can create compliance issues when active verification is required.<p>Also see: What Is an Investor Questionnaire for Regulation D? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/o1S0EtApsF0">https://youtu.be/o1S0EtApsF0</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:38:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a952e0a4/d2d7940c.mp3" length="5963624" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0EtApsF0">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The investor questionnaire isn't just intake paperwork; it is a syndication attorney's first line of defense for a sponsor. Learn why relying on a self-certified questionnaire can create compliance issues if you switch from a Rule 506(b) to a 506(c) offering.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The investor questionnaire isn't just intake paperwork; it is a syndication attorney's first line of defense for a sponsor. Learn why relying on a self-certified questionnaire can create compliance issues if you switch from a Rule 506(b) to a 506(c) offer</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a952e0a4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a952e0a4/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PPM Discloses, The Operating Agreement Governs</title>
      <itunes:title>The PPM Discloses, The Operating Agreement Governs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec5c32da-88ea-43d5-b509-a55e63bcea09</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/203bab32</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often spend weeks perfecting their pitch deck and Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), only to treat the Operating Agreement as generic boilerplate. But in a Regulation D syndication, the PPM only explains the deal—the Operating Agreement is the actual contract that runs the company. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the critical distinction between disclosing risks and governing mechanics. You will learn why essential terms like sponsor fees, manager authority, and removal rights live in the Operating Agreement, and how clearly defining concepts like a "preferred return" can prevent major investor disputes when cash flow gets tight.<p>Also see: What Is an Operating Agreement in a Reg D Syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/EyeBI1AQzpE">https://youtu.be/EyeBI1AQzpE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often spend weeks perfecting their pitch deck and Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), only to treat the Operating Agreement as generic boilerplate. But in a Regulation D syndication, the PPM only explains the deal—the Operating Agreement is the actual contract that runs the company. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the critical distinction between disclosing risks and governing mechanics. You will learn why essential terms like sponsor fees, manager authority, and removal rights live in the Operating Agreement, and how clearly defining concepts like a "preferred return" can prevent major investor disputes when cash flow gets tight.<p>Also see: What Is an Operating Agreement in a Reg D Syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/EyeBI1AQzpE">https://youtu.be/EyeBI1AQzpE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:31:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/203bab32/6e974a4e.mp3" length="5679046" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyeBI1AQzpE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>384</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a Regulation D syndication, sponsors often obsess over the Private Placement Memorandum while treating the Operating Agreement like boilerplate. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the PPM only tells the story, while the Operating Agreement actually governs the deal, controls your fees, and resolves investor disputes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a Regulation D syndication, sponsors often obsess over the Private Placement Memorandum while treating the Operating Agreement like boilerplate. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the PPM only tells the story, while the</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/203bab32/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/203bab32/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Hierarchy: PPM vs. Operating Agreement vs. Subscription Agreement</title>
      <itunes:title>Document Hierarchy: PPM vs. Operating Agreement vs. Subscription Agreement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5dc30c2-7e37-4ee7-a29b-735a4103880c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/025d819c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often treat their offering documents as one big stack of legal paperwork—one giant PDF they just call 'the PPM.' But treating your Private Placement Memorandum, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement as a single entity can create unexpected mismatches in execution.

In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the three distinct jobs of your core offering documents: Explain, Govern, and Enter. You'll learn why the Operating Agreement always wins in a conflict with the PPM, how a simple tweak to a preferred return can create an administrative nightmare, and exactly how to review your documents to ensure your disclosure perfectly matches your actual mechanics.<p>Also see: Reg D: Operating Agreement vs PPM vs Subscription Agreement — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0LwhktwJttk">https://youtu.be/0LwhktwJttk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often treat their offering documents as one big stack of legal paperwork—one giant PDF they just call 'the PPM.' But treating your Private Placement Memorandum, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement as a single entity can create unexpected mismatches in execution.

In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the three distinct jobs of your core offering documents: Explain, Govern, and Enter. You'll learn why the Operating Agreement always wins in a conflict with the PPM, how a simple tweak to a preferred return can create an administrative nightmare, and exactly how to review your documents to ensure your disclosure perfectly matches your actual mechanics.<p>Also see: Reg D: Operating Agreement vs PPM vs Subscription Agreement — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0LwhktwJttk">https://youtu.be/0LwhktwJttk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:30:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/025d819c/196490ef.mp3" length="6121758" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LwhktwJttk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often treat their offering documents as one giant PDF broadly called 'the PPM.' In this field note, we break down the distinct roles of the PPM, the Operating Agreement, and the Subscription Agreement to help you avoid costly mismatches in execution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often treat their offering documents as one giant PDF broadly called 'the PPM.' In this field note, we break down the distinct roles of the PPM, the Operating Agreement, and the Subscription Agreement to help you avoid costly mismatches in execut</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/025d819c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/025d819c/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rulebook of the Fund: What an LPA Actually Does</title>
      <itunes:title>The Rulebook of the Fund: What an LPA Actually Does</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49fa4192-24c2-4223-8360-1905caa8895e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad569c78</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In a private fund, sponsors spend months perfecting their pitch decks and Private Placement Memorandums, often treating the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) as standard, boilerplate paperwork to simply sign and file away. But while the PPM describes your deal to investors, the LPA is the actual rulebook that dictates how you run it. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, we unpack the true role of the LPA—or Operating Agreement for LLCs—and its two core functions: economics and governance. Through a practical scenario regarding cash reserves, we illustrate how recycling old legal documents can unintentionally strip away your managerial flexibility. Listen in to learn why reading your LPA like a binding five-year operational roadmap is essential before taking in a single dollar of investor capital.<p>Also see: What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/mM8wbykost0">https://youtu.be/mM8wbykost0</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In a private fund, sponsors spend months perfecting their pitch decks and Private Placement Memorandums, often treating the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) as standard, boilerplate paperwork to simply sign and file away. But while the PPM describes your deal to investors, the LPA is the actual rulebook that dictates how you run it. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, we unpack the true role of the LPA—or Operating Agreement for LLCs—and its two core functions: economics and governance. Through a practical scenario regarding cash reserves, we illustrate how recycling old legal documents can unintentionally strip away your managerial flexibility. Listen in to learn why reading your LPA like a binding five-year operational roadmap is essential before taking in a single dollar of investor capital.<p>Also see: What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/mM8wbykost0">https://youtu.be/mM8wbykost0</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:29:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ad569c78/bc02a100.mp3" length="5907347" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM8wbykost0">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>400</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often treat the Limited Partnership Agreement as boilerplate paperwork. In this field note, we explore why the LPA is actually the engine of your fund and how recycling old documents can accidentally box in your operational flexibility.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often treat the Limited Partnership Agreement as boilerplate paperwork. In this field note, we explore why the LPA is actually the engine of your fund and how recycling old documents can accidentally box in your operational flexibility.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad569c78/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad569c78/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Form D vs. the PPM: Notice vs. Disclosure</title>
      <itunes:title>Form D vs. the PPM: Notice vs. Disclosure</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b121b111-f508-47eb-881d-2f571b55b365</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6649fa54</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Filing a Form D for a Regulation D syndication does not mean the SEC has approved your deal or protected you from investor lawsuits. In this episode, we unpack the critical difference between keeping the government informed and keeping your capital raise secure. We cover:

• Why an accepted EDGAR filing is simply a notice, not a regulatory blessing.
• The distinct master each document serves: Form D for the regulators, and the PPM for your investors.
• A hypothetical $3 million raise that demonstrates what happens when sponsors substitute a pitch deck for a proper disclosure document.
• The correct sequence of events: when to draft the PPM, when to accept funds, and exactly when to file your Form D.<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc">https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Filing a Form D for a Regulation D syndication does not mean the SEC has approved your deal or protected you from investor lawsuits. In this episode, we unpack the critical difference between keeping the government informed and keeping your capital raise secure. We cover:

• Why an accepted EDGAR filing is simply a notice, not a regulatory blessing.
• The distinct master each document serves: Form D for the regulators, and the PPM for your investors.
• A hypothetical $3 million raise that demonstrates what happens when sponsors substitute a pitch deck for a proper disclosure document.
• The correct sequence of events: when to draft the PPM, when to accept funds, and exactly when to file your Form D.<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc">https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:29:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6649fa54/4d647ca0.mp3" length="5222136" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fJNF8JwvBc">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>352</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume filing a Form D with the SEC means their capital raise is fully protected. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why Form D is just a notice to regulators, and why you still need a PPM to shield yourself from investor claims.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume filing a Form D with the SEC means their capital raise is fully protected. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why Form D is just a notice to regulators, and why you still need a PPM to shield yourself from investor claims.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6649fa54/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6649fa54/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Form D vs. the PPM: Notice vs. Disclosure</title>
      <itunes:title>Form D vs. the PPM: Notice vs. Disclosure</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b046a676-ea9b-4f86-a460-8998b824d621</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad850ef0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a common point of confusion for sponsors raising capital under Regulation D. After successfully filing a Form D on EDGAR, some sponsors assume they are registered and protected, leading them to skip drafting a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to save on upfront costs. This episode breaks down the entirely different jobs of these two items. Form D is simply a notice filing for regulators, offering no approval of the deal and zero protection against investor disputes. The PPM, conversely, is a comprehensive disclosure document that warns investors of risks—acting as the sponsor's true shield. Through a $3 million hypothetical scenario, Tilden illustrates the vulnerability of relying only on a pitch deck and a Form D, outlining the correct sequence every sponsor can follow to stay aligned with both regulators and investors.<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc">https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a common point of confusion for sponsors raising capital under Regulation D. After successfully filing a Form D on EDGAR, some sponsors assume they are registered and protected, leading them to skip drafting a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to save on upfront costs. This episode breaks down the entirely different jobs of these two items. Form D is simply a notice filing for regulators, offering no approval of the deal and zero protection against investor disputes. The PPM, conversely, is a comprehensive disclosure document that warns investors of risks—acting as the sponsor's true shield. Through a $3 million hypothetical scenario, Tilden illustrates the vulnerability of relying only on a pitch deck and a Form D, outlining the correct sequence every sponsor can follow to stay aligned with both regulators and investors.<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc">https://youtu.be/9fJNF8JwvBc</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:26:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ad850ef0/decde6b2.mp3" length="4855601" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fJNF8JwvBc">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>325</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume that filing a Form D with the SEC provides legal protection for their raise. This episode explains why Form D is just a notice to the government, and why a Private Placement Memorandum is the actual shield against investor claims.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume that filing a Form D with the SEC provides legal protection for their raise. This episode explains why Form D is just a notice to the government, and why a Private Placement Memorandum is the actual shield against investor claims.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad850ef0/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad850ef0/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Form D Deadlines: When Does the 15-Day Clock Actually Start?</title>
      <itunes:title>Form D Deadlines: When Does the 15-Day Clock Actually Start?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6836107-9f95-4eea-a81f-90452da47aea</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6d7f8429</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Are you waiting until your syndication round closes to file your Form D? You might be accidentally missing your federal deadline. Under Regulation D, sponsors have 15 calendar days from the "first sale" to file a Form D with the SEC. But what exactly qualifies as a first sale? In this episode, we break down the practical timeline of when the clock starts, why a Form D is simply a notice (not a request for permission), and how waiting for the final dollar to arrive can create administrative complications for your state Blue Sky filings.<p>Also see: When Is Form D Due? First Sale in Regulation D Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/wRzEmChpBss">https://youtu.be/wRzEmChpBss</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Are you waiting until your syndication round closes to file your Form D? You might be accidentally missing your federal deadline. Under Regulation D, sponsors have 15 calendar days from the "first sale" to file a Form D with the SEC. But what exactly qualifies as a first sale? In this episode, we break down the practical timeline of when the clock starts, why a Form D is simply a notice (not a request for permission), and how waiting for the final dollar to arrive can create administrative complications for your state Blue Sky filings.<p>Also see: When Is Form D Due? First Sale in Regulation D Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/wRzEmChpBss">https://youtu.be/wRzEmChpBss</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:19:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6d7f8429/778448a2.mp3" length="4574716" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRzEmChpBss">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>305</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume they can wait until a syndication round is fully closed to file their Form D. In this field note, we clarify what the "first sale" actually means and when your 15-day federal filing clock really begins.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume they can wait until a syndication round is fully closed to file their Form D. In this field note, we clarify what the "first sale" actually means and when your 15-day federal filing clock really begins.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6d7f8429/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6d7f8429/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The First Sale Trigger: Calculating Your Form D Deadline</title>
      <itunes:title>The First Sale Trigger: Calculating Your Form D Deadline</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b337919-bff2-47a4-a003-a9c30d1e3024</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/02dfaea7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Filing a Form D for a Regulation D syndication often trips up sponsors who assume the paperwork is due when the fund closes. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the SEC clock actually starts much earlier. You will learn how to identify the 'first sale' trigger, how to count the 15-calendar-day deadline, and why missing it creates a manageable administrative problem rather than an unfixable catastrophe. Tune in to understand why treating the Form D as an opening task keeps your offering compliant and your state-level Blue Sky filings on track.<p>Also see: SEC Form D Filing Deadlines for Regulation D Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/JFcZ-LgiGTU">https://youtu.be/JFcZ-LgiGTU</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Filing a Form D for a Regulation D syndication often trips up sponsors who assume the paperwork is due when the fund closes. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the SEC clock actually starts much earlier. You will learn how to identify the 'first sale' trigger, how to count the 15-calendar-day deadline, and why missing it creates a manageable administrative problem rather than an unfixable catastrophe. Tune in to understand why treating the Form D as an opening task keeps your offering compliant and your state-level Blue Sky filings on track.<p>Also see: SEC Form D Filing Deadlines for Regulation D Offerings — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/JFcZ-LgiGTU">https://youtu.be/JFcZ-LgiGTU</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:18:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/02dfaea7/8a93d734.mp3" length="4645483" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFcZ-LgiGTU">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>311</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume their Form D filing happens at the finish line of a capital raise. In reality, the clock starts much earlier. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the 'first sale' trigger, how to calculate your 15-day deadline, and what to do if you miss it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume their Form D filing happens at the finish line of a capital raise. In reality, the clock starts much earlier. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the 'first sale' trigger, how to calculate your 15-day deadline, and what to </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/02dfaea7/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/02dfaea7/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blue Sky Notice Filings: The Rule 506 State Fee Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>Blue Sky Notice Filings: The Rule 506 State Fee Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ea91034-58cb-456a-8770-5200eb125e23</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8131e214</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When running a Rule 506 offering, many sponsors assume that federal preemption means they don't have to worry about state-level compliance. In reality, preemption only prevents states from reviewing the merits of your deal. They can—and do—still require notice filings and fees. In this episode, Tilden explains the mechanics of Blue Sky notice filings, how the varying state deadlines work, and how your syndication attorney can manage these requirements in tandem with your federal filings to avoid easily preventable late fees.<p>Also see: Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/pBNIb_vWCXM">https://youtu.be/pBNIb_vWCXM</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When running a Rule 506 offering, many sponsors assume that federal preemption means they don't have to worry about state-level compliance. In reality, preemption only prevents states from reviewing the merits of your deal. They can—and do—still require notice filings and fees. In this episode, Tilden explains the mechanics of Blue Sky notice filings, how the varying state deadlines work, and how your syndication attorney can manage these requirements in tandem with your federal filings to avoid easily preventable late fees.<p>Also see: Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/pBNIb_vWCXM">https://youtu.be/pBNIb_vWCXM</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:17:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8131e214/c2554a42.mp3" length="5105246" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBNIb_vWCXM">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>343</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume that federal preemption under Rule 506 means they can completely ignore state-level compliance. Tilden explains why this is a misunderstanding and how to avoid unnecessary late fees by properly managing state-by-state notice deadlines.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume that federal preemption under Rule 506 means they can completely ignore state-level compliance. Tilden explains why this is a misunderstanding and how to avoid unnecessary late fees by properly managing state-by-state notice deadline</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8131e214/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8131e214/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Subscription Agreement as a Purchase Contract</title>
      <itunes:title>The Subscription Agreement as a Purchase Contract</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1b4ce83d-42f8-4cb9-a273-93bd6b233995</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fce8df0d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Subscription Agreement in a Regulation D syndication is often treated as a generic form or a simple receipt for wired funds. But treating it as an afterthought is a mistake. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the actual legal function of the Subscription Agreement as the primary purchase contract for your securities. We explore the critical differences between the Private Placement Memorandum (which discloses) and the Subscription Agreement (which binds). You will learn what promises investors are actually making when they sign, the mechanics of issuer acceptance, and why relying on generic internet templates can create downstream headaches regarding unit transfers and investor representations.<p>Also see: What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/YHvOkXn-mms">https://youtu.be/YHvOkXn-mms</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Subscription Agreement in a Regulation D syndication is often treated as a generic form or a simple receipt for wired funds. But treating it as an afterthought is a mistake. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the actual legal function of the Subscription Agreement as the primary purchase contract for your securities. We explore the critical differences between the Private Placement Memorandum (which discloses) and the Subscription Agreement (which binds). You will learn what promises investors are actually making when they sign, the mechanics of issuer acceptance, and why relying on generic internet templates can create downstream headaches regarding unit transfers and investor representations.<p>Also see: What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/YHvOkXn-mms">https://youtu.be/YHvOkXn-mms</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:15:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fce8df0d/3390e6fc.mp3" length="5505655" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHvOkXn-mms">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>372</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often treat the Subscription Agreement as generic administrative paperwork, but it serves as the actual purchase contract in a private placement. Tilden Moschetti explains how this document legally binds investors and why using boilerplate templates can create headaches down the line.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often treat the Subscription Agreement as generic administrative paperwork, but it serves as the actual purchase contract in a private placement. Tilden Moschetti explains how this document legally binds investors and why using boilerplate templa</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fce8df0d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fce8df0d/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LLC vs. LP for Reg D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>LLC vs. LP for Reg D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">053f416f-6049-4ab3-ba1a-6a2167ce8fe4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bd00bf05</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The choice between a Limited Liability Company (LLC) and a Limited Partnership (LP) in a Regulation D syndication often creates unnecessary paralysis for sponsors. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti clears up the confusion surrounding entity selection, explaining why the corporate shell you choose is simply a bucket to hold assets.

Inside the episode, we cover:
• The core structural differences between an LP and an LLC in plain English.
• Why pass-through taxation makes the "best tax entity" a highly fact-dependent question for your CPA.
• A practical hypothetical showing how investor familiarity should drive your entity choice.
• Why you should spend less time worrying about the entity and more time focusing on your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM).

Tune in to learn how to make an informed, practical decision so you can stop second-guessing and get back to raising capital.<p>Also see: Limited Liability Company vs. LP for Reg D Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/QIhgX66OALE">https://youtu.be/QIhgX66OALE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The choice between a Limited Liability Company (LLC) and a Limited Partnership (LP) in a Regulation D syndication often creates unnecessary paralysis for sponsors. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti clears up the confusion surrounding entity selection, explaining why the corporate shell you choose is simply a bucket to hold assets.

Inside the episode, we cover:
• The core structural differences between an LP and an LLC in plain English.
• Why pass-through taxation makes the "best tax entity" a highly fact-dependent question for your CPA.
• A practical hypothetical showing how investor familiarity should drive your entity choice.
• Why you should spend less time worrying about the entity and more time focusing on your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM).

Tune in to learn how to make an informed, practical decision so you can stop second-guessing and get back to raising capital.<p>Also see: Limited Liability Company vs. LP for Reg D Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/QIhgX66OALE">https://youtu.be/QIhgX66OALE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:14:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bd00bf05/a11c1bc2.mp3" length="6520651" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIhgX66OALE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The choice between a Limited Liability Company (LLC) and a Limited Partnership (LP) in a Regulation D syndication can freeze sponsors in their tracks. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why neither entity is a magic shield and how to choose the right structure based on your specific investor mix.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The choice between a Limited Liability Company (LLC) and a Limited Partnership (LP) in a Regulation D syndication can freeze sponsors in their tracks. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why neither entity is a magic shield and how to choose</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bd00bf05/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bd00bf05/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reg D Legal Package: PPM vs. Operating Agreement vs. Subscription Agreement</title>
      <itunes:title>The Reg D Legal Package: PPM vs. Operating Agreement vs. Subscription Agreement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3cec222-6d06-4594-8c6c-4c319c6f9c04</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/942e8ac9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often look at their Regulation D legal package and assume it's just repetitive red tape. If the Private Placement Memorandum states that voting rights are restricted, and the Operating Agreement says the exact same thing, it's easy to assume the information is just redundant. The dangerous resulting assumption is that the PPM is the only document that matters. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why these documents are actually doing three different jobs. The PPM acts as your disclosure shield, the Operating Agreement functions as the legal engine that governs the company, and the Subscription Agreement is the executing contract that binds the investor to the rules. Using a practical hypothetical about early investor transfers, we explore how this interlocking system functions to protect your deal and why removing any single document creates a gap in your structure.<p>Also see: Subscription Agreement vs PPM vs Operating Agreement: Reg D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/VYTjB3SEe9g">https://youtu.be/VYTjB3SEe9g</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often look at their Regulation D legal package and assume it's just repetitive red tape. If the Private Placement Memorandum states that voting rights are restricted, and the Operating Agreement says the exact same thing, it's easy to assume the information is just redundant. The dangerous resulting assumption is that the PPM is the only document that matters. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why these documents are actually doing three different jobs. The PPM acts as your disclosure shield, the Operating Agreement functions as the legal engine that governs the company, and the Subscription Agreement is the executing contract that binds the investor to the rules. Using a practical hypothetical about early investor transfers, we explore how this interlocking system functions to protect your deal and why removing any single document creates a gap in your structure.<p>Also see: Subscription Agreement vs PPM vs Operating Agreement: Reg D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/VYTjB3SEe9g">https://youtu.be/VYTjB3SEe9g</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:12:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/942e8ac9/c74043d1.mp3" length="6107301" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYTjB3SEe9g">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>415</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often view their Regulation D legal package as repetitive red tape. Learn why the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement are actually an interlocking system doing three very different jobs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often view their Regulation D legal package as repetitive red tape. Learn why the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement are actually an interlocking system doing three very different jobs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/942e8ac9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/942e8ac9/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a Questionnaire Doesn't Protect Your 506(c) Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>Why a Questionnaire Doesn't Protect Your 506(c) Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2dd8a7c-f8b0-43be-8448-f439ce13cfd2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/95407a51</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the critical difference between self-certification under Rule 506(b) and reasonable verification under Rule 506(c). Many sponsors mistakenly believe that a detailed accredited investor questionnaire, signed under penalty of perjury, offers blanket protection for any Regulation D offering. We explore why reusing 506(b) paperwork for a publicly advertised 506(c) raise creates an exemption issue, how to actually verify an investor's status, and why you don't necessarily need to pay a third-party service to do it. Tune in to learn how to safely match your paperwork to your exemption.<p>Also see: Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/vLKuYcp3w1g">https://youtu.be/vLKuYcp3w1g</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the critical difference between self-certification under Rule 506(b) and reasonable verification under Rule 506(c). Many sponsors mistakenly believe that a detailed accredited investor questionnaire, signed under penalty of perjury, offers blanket protection for any Regulation D offering. We explore why reusing 506(b) paperwork for a publicly advertised 506(c) raise creates an exemption issue, how to actually verify an investor's status, and why you don't necessarily need to pay a third-party service to do it. Tune in to learn how to safely match your paperwork to your exemption.<p>Also see: Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/vLKuYcp3w1g">https://youtu.be/vLKuYcp3w1g</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:10:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/95407a51/8ad4447e.mp3" length="5895784" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLKuYcp3w1g">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>400</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume a signed accredited investor questionnaire is enough to protect their Regulation D offering. In this Field Note, we explore why a sworn statement works for Rule 506(b) but falls short as reasonable verification for a Rule 506(c) raise.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume a signed accredited investor questionnaire is enough to protect their Regulation D offering. In this Field Note, we explore why a sworn statement works for Rule 506(b) but falls short as reasonable verification for a Rule 506(c) rais</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/95407a51/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/95407a51/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Rule 144A is Usually the Wrong Tool for Mid-Market Syndicators</title>
      <itunes:title>Why Rule 144A is Usually the Wrong Tool for Mid-Market Syndicators</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d12a5276-0bb7-4753-92bb-7402502ed8fa</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1d3fe6f8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors frequently ask if they should structure their deals under Rule 144A to give investors a secondary trading market. The assumption is that 144A is just a more liquid version of Regulation D. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the practical reality of Rule 144A and who it was actually built to serve. We look at the crucial difference between an Accredited Investor and a Qualified Institutional Buyer (QIB), the friction of bringing institutional frameworks to a $15 million mid-market fund, and how to address investor liquidity concerns properly inside a standard Reg D operating agreement using transfer or redemption provisions.<p>Also see: 144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/3ve6pMTSieI">https://youtu.be/3ve6pMTSieI</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors frequently ask if they should structure their deals under Rule 144A to give investors a secondary trading market. The assumption is that 144A is just a more liquid version of Regulation D. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the practical reality of Rule 144A and who it was actually built to serve. We look at the crucial difference between an Accredited Investor and a Qualified Institutional Buyer (QIB), the friction of bringing institutional frameworks to a $15 million mid-market fund, and how to address investor liquidity concerns properly inside a standard Reg D operating agreement using transfer or redemption provisions.<p>Also see: 144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/3ve6pMTSieI">https://youtu.be/3ve6pMTSieI</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 23:25:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1d3fe6f8/b0ee6942.mp3" length="5716021" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ve6pMTSieI">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>387</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A brief look at why syndicators seeking investor liquidity often mistakenly look to Rule 144A, and why Regulation D remains the practical choice for mid-market raises.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A brief look at why syndicators seeking investor liquidity often mistakenly look to Rule 144A, and why Regulation D remains the practical choice for mid-market raises.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1d3fe6f8/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1d3fe6f8/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Joint Venture Unregistered Security Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>The Joint Venture Unregistered Security Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2eead5f8-20e2-4fbc-84a0-b5d36fc7f08e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/40c500c4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you avoid syndication paperwork by calling your capital raise a joint venture? Many sponsors assume that if they only have a few investors, a simple JV agreement will suffice. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the legal reality is determined by the facts, not the document's title. We explore the critical distinction between active partners and passive capital, the unintended liability of selling an unregistered security, and why a Regulation D syndication is usually the better structure for keeping operational control.<p>Also see: Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/6lhPHd_cUog">https://youtu.be/6lhPHd_cUog</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you avoid syndication paperwork by calling your capital raise a joint venture? Many sponsors assume that if they only have a few investors, a simple JV agreement will suffice. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the legal reality is determined by the facts, not the document's title. We explore the critical distinction between active partners and passive capital, the unintended liability of selling an unregistered security, and why a Regulation D syndication is usually the better structure for keeping operational control.<p>Also see: Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/6lhPHd_cUog">https://youtu.be/6lhPHd_cUog</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 23:05:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/40c500c4/186408a9.mp3" length="5281150" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lhPHd_cUog">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>356</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often try to bypass syndication paperwork by using a simple Joint Venture Agreement for a few friends or family members. Tilden Moschetti explains why the label on the document doesn't dictate the legal reality—and why this shortcut can create unexpected liability and control issues.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often try to bypass syndication paperwork by using a simple Joint Venture Agreement for a few friends or family members. Tilden Moschetti explains why the label on the document doesn't dictate the legal reality—and why this shortcut can create un</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/40c500c4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/40c500c4/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Convertible Promissory Notes for Early Capital</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Convertible Promissory Notes for Early Capital</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b6bcad5-7b26-47ed-a633-305027bae102</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d1983672</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Convertible promissory notes for bridging early capital in a Regulation D syndication can solve a specific sequencing problem, but they aren't a marketing gimmick. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down how these notes work, the earnest money gap they fill, and the crucial drafting elements sponsors often miss. Learn about conversion triggers, handling accrued interest, and what happens to early investors if the deal fails to close.<p>Also see: Convertible Promissory Note for Real Estate Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/MC6Canfkj8M">https://youtu.be/MC6Canfkj8M</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Convertible promissory notes for bridging early capital in a Regulation D syndication can solve a specific sequencing problem, but they aren't a marketing gimmick. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down how these notes work, the earnest money gap they fill, and the crucial drafting elements sponsors often miss. Learn about conversion triggers, handling accrued interest, and what happens to early investors if the deal fails to close.<p>Also see: Convertible Promissory Note for Real Estate Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/MC6Canfkj8M">https://youtu.be/MC6Canfkj8M</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:44:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d1983672/20b481c2.mp3" length="5132161" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MC6Canfkj8M">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>345</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Convertible promissory notes for bridging early capital in a Regulation D syndication can solve a specific sequencing problem. Tilden Moschetti breaks down how they work, the drafting mechanics you need to nail, and why they shouldn't be used just to dress up a standard raise.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Convertible promissory notes for bridging early capital in a Regulation D syndication can solve a specific sequencing problem. Tilden Moschetti breaks down how they work, the drafting mechanics you need to nail, and why they shouldn't be used just to dres</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d1983672/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d1983672/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Isolate Syndication Deals in Single Purpose Entities</title>
      <itunes:title>Why We Isolate Syndication Deals in Single Purpose Entities</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8d4519a4-3b22-4712-856e-fa8cce91e4ad</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e83e004a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Isolating real estate assets in a Regulation D syndication is a core structural requirement, yet sponsors frequently ask if they can reuse an existing LLC to save on formation costs. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why commingling multiple properties in one entity can create accounting friction and unnecessary liability exposure. We walk through a practical whiteboard example of mixed investor waterfalls and cross-deal liability. We also unpack the true economic and legal functions of a Single Purpose Entity (SPE), along with a necessary reality check: an SPE isolates risk, but it is not an absolute guarantee against liability.<p>Also see: Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/QzkpBPdlN9Y">https://youtu.be/QzkpBPdlN9Y</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Isolating real estate assets in a Regulation D syndication is a core structural requirement, yet sponsors frequently ask if they can reuse an existing LLC to save on formation costs. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why commingling multiple properties in one entity can create accounting friction and unnecessary liability exposure. We walk through a practical whiteboard example of mixed investor waterfalls and cross-deal liability. We also unpack the true economic and legal functions of a Single Purpose Entity (SPE), along with a necessary reality check: an SPE isolates risk, but it is not an absolute guarantee against liability.<p>Also see: Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/QzkpBPdlN9Y">https://youtu.be/QzkpBPdlN9Y</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:24:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e83e004a/ad027a68.mp3" length="5208091" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzkpBPdlN9Y">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>351</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often ask why they can't reuse an existing LLC for a new deal to save money. Tilden explains why commingling assets can create an accounting and liability mess, and why every syndication needs its own Single Purpose Entity (SPE).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often ask why they can't reuse an existing LLC for a new deal to save money. Tilden explains why commingling assets can create an accounting and liability mess, and why every syndication needs its own Single Purpose Entity (SPE).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e83e004a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e83e004a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transitioning a Hedge Fund Incubator to a Regulation D Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>Transitioning a Hedge Fund Incubator to a Regulation D Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6d05f24-c7ff-492c-9e8e-d237a4661ed0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e23e4257</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Moving from trading your own money in an incubator to taking outside capital under Regulation D is a major shift. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why accepting an outside check into your existing trading account can create an unregistered securities offering. We cover the true definition of a hedge fund incubator, the practical choice between Rule 506(b) and 506(c), the potential overlap with investment adviser rules, and the vital sequence of putting structure before money. This is an essential listen for emerging managers preparing to scale a proven trading strategy.<p>Also see: Hedge Fund Incubator: From Trading to Regulation D Offering — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/yHTXhii2yYg">https://youtu.be/yHTXhii2yYg</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Moving from trading your own money in an incubator to taking outside capital under Regulation D is a major shift. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why accepting an outside check into your existing trading account can create an unregistered securities offering. We cover the true definition of a hedge fund incubator, the practical choice between Rule 506(b) and 506(c), the potential overlap with investment adviser rules, and the vital sequence of putting structure before money. This is an essential listen for emerging managers preparing to scale a proven trading strategy.<p>Also see: Hedge Fund Incubator: From Trading to Regulation D Offering — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/yHTXhii2yYg">https://youtu.be/yHTXhii2yYg</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:05:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e23e4257/aac772ba.mp3" length="7144212" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHTXhii2yYg">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>489</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti explains the legal transition from trading your own money in an incubator to accepting outside capital under a Regulation D offering, highlighting why structural sequencing matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti explains the legal transition from trading your own money in an incubator to accepting outside capital under a Regulation D offering, highlighting why structural sequencing matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e23e4257/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e23e4257/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Order-Taker Trap: Evaluating Counsel for Your Regulation D Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>The Order-Taker Trap: Evaluating Counsel for Your Regulation D Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09e8e488-5714-4a0e-a232-688886fe4844</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4fa03216</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that hiring legal counsel for a syndication simply involves handing over a term sheet and waiting for the compliant documents to return. In this field note, we explore the hidden danger of hiring an 'order-taker' attorney—someone who ensures SEC compliance but fails to account for operational reality.

We examine a common hypothetical involving an 8% monthly preferred return to illustrate how inflexible legal drafting can inadvertently cause a default when standard business delays occur. Finally, we provide a practical framework and a specific interview question to help you evaluate whether a prospective syndication attorney understands the friction of raising capital and the reality of running an asset.<p>Also see: PPM Lawyers: The Ultimate Guide to Hiring a Reg D Attorney (From a Lawyer Who Actually Syndicates) — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-lawyers-the-ultimate-guide-to-hiring-a-reg-d-attorney-from-a-lawyer-who-actually-syndicates/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-lawyers-the-ultimate-guide-to-hiring-a-reg-d-attorney-from-a-lawyer-who-actually-syndicates/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/E6NRuLZEztQ">https://youtu.be/E6NRuLZEztQ</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that hiring legal counsel for a syndication simply involves handing over a term sheet and waiting for the compliant documents to return. In this field note, we explore the hidden danger of hiring an 'order-taker' attorney—someone who ensures SEC compliance but fails to account for operational reality.

We examine a common hypothetical involving an 8% monthly preferred return to illustrate how inflexible legal drafting can inadvertently cause a default when standard business delays occur. Finally, we provide a practical framework and a specific interview question to help you evaluate whether a prospective syndication attorney understands the friction of raising capital and the reality of running an asset.<p>Also see: PPM Lawyers: The Ultimate Guide to Hiring a Reg D Attorney (From a Lawyer Who Actually Syndicates) — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-lawyers-the-ultimate-guide-to-hiring-a-reg-d-attorney-from-a-lawyer-who-actually-syndicates/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-lawyers-the-ultimate-guide-to-hiring-a-reg-d-attorney-from-a-lawyer-who-actually-syndicates/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/E6NRuLZEztQ">https://youtu.be/E6NRuLZEztQ</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:59:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4fa03216/6d8cc97e.mp3" length="5571337" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6NRuLZEztQ">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>377</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume hiring legal counsel is just a matter of handing over a term sheet. Tilden Moschetti explains the danger of the 'order-taker' attorney and how to filter for legal counsel that protects your operational flexibility.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume hiring legal counsel is just a matter of handing over a term sheet. Tilden Moschetti explains the danger of the 'order-taker' attorney and how to filter for legal counsel that protects your operational flexibility.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4fa03216/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4fa03216/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raising Foreign Capital: Coordinating Reg S and Reg D</title>
      <itunes:title>Raising Foreign Capital: Coordinating Reg S and Reg D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8dbd22b8-056e-4ab9-911f-5f9171a2e15b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2c01792</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Raising capital from foreign investors comes with a common misconception: because the money is offshore, U.S. securities rules don't apply. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains why the SEC pays close attention to a U.S. issuer's domestic marketing. Learn the two core requirements of Regulation S, how an efficient global email blast can create a compliance issue, and the practical way to coordinate Reg S alongside a Regulation D offering by keeping your marketing lanes separate.<p>Also see: Regulation S, Plain and Simple: How U.S. Sponsors Raise Capital Offshore for Syndications and Funds — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-s-raising-money-from-offshore-investors-2/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-s-raising-money-from-offshore-investors-2/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/CAgrOij5J7k">https://youtu.be/CAgrOij5J7k</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Raising capital from foreign investors comes with a common misconception: because the money is offshore, U.S. securities rules don't apply. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains why the SEC pays close attention to a U.S. issuer's domestic marketing. Learn the two core requirements of Regulation S, how an efficient global email blast can create a compliance issue, and the practical way to coordinate Reg S alongside a Regulation D offering by keeping your marketing lanes separate.<p>Also see: Regulation S, Plain and Simple: How U.S. Sponsors Raise Capital Offshore for Syndications and Funds — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-s-raising-money-from-offshore-investors-2/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-s-raising-money-from-offshore-investors-2/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/CAgrOij5J7k">https://youtu.be/CAgrOij5J7k</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:39:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a2c01792/475a0287.mp3" length="5231102" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAgrOij5J7k">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>352</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume U.S. securities rules don't apply to foreign investors. This field note explains why the SEC focuses on a sponsor's marketing, and how to safely run Regulation S and Regulation D offerings side-by-side.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume U.S. securities rules don't apply to foreign investors. This field note explains why the SEC focuses on a sponsor's marketing, and how to safely run Regulation S and Regulation D offerings side-by-side.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2c01792/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2c01792/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 'Exempt' Trap for Reg D Fund Sponsors</title>
      <itunes:title>The 'Exempt' Trap for Reg D Fund Sponsors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3074e05b-1947-491b-881d-942bd4bc4a26</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/63d80019</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do you qualify for a private fund adviser exemption? For many Reg D fund sponsors, the word 'exempt' creates a false sense of security, leading to the assumption that no paperwork or filings are required. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why 'exempt' rarely means doing nothing. We unpack the actual requirements of an Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA), the necessity of filing a Form ADV, and how to navigate the varying state and federal thresholds. We also look at a practical whiteboard example of a $25M debt fund to illustrate how missed filings can create unnecessary regulatory friction, and why your filings must perfectly align with your underlying fund documents.<p>Also see: Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/c53dGMdY9Uo">https://youtu.be/c53dGMdY9Uo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Do you qualify for a private fund adviser exemption? For many Reg D fund sponsors, the word 'exempt' creates a false sense of security, leading to the assumption that no paperwork or filings are required. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why 'exempt' rarely means doing nothing. We unpack the actual requirements of an Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA), the necessity of filing a Form ADV, and how to navigate the varying state and federal thresholds. We also look at a practical whiteboard example of a $25M debt fund to illustrate how missed filings can create unnecessary regulatory friction, and why your filings must perfectly align with your underlying fund documents.<p>Also see: Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/c53dGMdY9Uo">https://youtu.be/c53dGMdY9Uo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:08:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/63d80019/9af9715a.mp3" length="5434967" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c53dGMdY9Uo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>367</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many Reg D fund sponsors assume that qualifying for a private fund adviser exemption means they have no paperwork or filing requirements. In this field note, we break down why 'exempt' rarely means doing nothing, the reality of the Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA) status, and why filing your Form ADV matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many Reg D fund sponsors assume that qualifying for a private fund adviser exemption means they have no paperwork or filing requirements. In this field note, we break down why 'exempt' rarely means doing nothing, the reality of the Exempt Reporting Advise</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/63d80019/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/63d80019/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Disclosure Trap in Ground-Up Development Raises</title>
      <itunes:title>The Disclosure Trap in Ground-Up Development Raises</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2e818125-c134-48a0-aa89-44d5cb4a01f3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a5d45feb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a Regulation D equity raise for ground-up development requires a different mindset than buying a cash-flowing apartment building. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti examines the trap of using interest reserves to fund immediate preferred returns on dirt projects. Learn why letting your preferred return accrue in the Operating Agreement preserves capital for when it is actually needed, and why the anti-fraud rule makes a full Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) highly practical, even for accredited-only raises. This is a focused field note on matching your legal documents to the operational reality of your specific deal.<p>Also see: Real Estate Development Financing with Regulation D Equity — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/HcyOdCKoc1k">https://youtu.be/HcyOdCKoc1k</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a Regulation D equity raise for ground-up development requires a different mindset than buying a cash-flowing apartment building. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti examines the trap of using interest reserves to fund immediate preferred returns on dirt projects. Learn why letting your preferred return accrue in the Operating Agreement preserves capital for when it is actually needed, and why the anti-fraud rule makes a full Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) highly practical, even for accredited-only raises. This is a focused field note on matching your legal documents to the operational reality of your specific deal.<p>Also see: Real Estate Development Financing with Regulation D Equity — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/HcyOdCKoc1k">https://youtu.be/HcyOdCKoc1k</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 17:49:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a5d45feb/ab907806.mp3" length="5808821" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcyOdCKoc1k">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Structuring a Regulation D equity raise for ground-up development requires a different approach than a stabilized asset. Tilden Moschetti explains the danger of mandating current preferred returns from interest reserves and why a PPM is a practical necessity, even for accredited investors.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Structuring a Regulation D equity raise for ground-up development requires a different approach than a stabilized asset. Tilden Moschetti explains the danger of mandating current preferred returns from interest reserves and why a PPM is a practical necess</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a5d45feb/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a5d45feb/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>506(b) vs. 506(c): The Marketing and Verification Tradeoff</title>
      <itunes:title>506(b) vs. 506(c): The Marketing and Verification Tradeoff</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a100e361-74b0-4f25-972c-444ffd4284bf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1ec8f9c5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a Regulation D capital raise under Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c) forces sponsors to make a fundamental choice between public marketing and private relationships. Can you run digital ads for your fund and still include your sophisticated, non-accredited investors? In this episode, we cover why mixing the rules can create compliance issues, the differences in onboarding friction, and why choosing your lane is a business decision before it becomes a legal one. We explore how Rule 506(b) preserves your private network and allows low-friction self-certification, while Rule 506(c) opens the door to general solicitation but requires reasonable steps to verify accreditation. Before you draft your PPM, listen to this breakdown to align your legal structure with your actual investor pipeline.<p>Also see: 506(c) vs 506(b): Regulation D Capital Raise Choices — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/qNWBggyBuL4">https://youtu.be/qNWBggyBuL4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a Regulation D capital raise under Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c) forces sponsors to make a fundamental choice between public marketing and private relationships. Can you run digital ads for your fund and still include your sophisticated, non-accredited investors? In this episode, we cover why mixing the rules can create compliance issues, the differences in onboarding friction, and why choosing your lane is a business decision before it becomes a legal one. We explore how Rule 506(b) preserves your private network and allows low-friction self-certification, while Rule 506(c) opens the door to general solicitation but requires reasonable steps to verify accreditation. Before you draft your PPM, listen to this breakdown to align your legal structure with your actual investor pipeline.<p>Also see: 506(c) vs 506(b): Regulation D Capital Raise Choices — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/qNWBggyBuL4">https://youtu.be/qNWBggyBuL4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 17:28:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1ec8f9c5/ad1647b4.mp3" length="5819910" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNWBggyBuL4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>394</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Structuring a Regulation D capital raise under Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c) forces a critical choice. This episode explores the core tension sponsors face when they want to market publicly but also include loyal, non-accredited investors.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Structuring a Regulation D capital raise under Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c) forces a critical choice. This episode explores the core tension sponsors face when they want to market publicly but also include loyal, non-accredited investors.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1ec8f9c5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1ec8f9c5/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Evergreen Fund Trap: Closed-End vs. Open-End Reality Check</title>
      <itunes:title>The Evergreen Fund Trap: Closed-End vs. Open-End Reality Check</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6f2918d-7160-4352-aec0-2c8bfb004328</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8189bf3b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a private equity fund and matching it to the liquidity of your assets requires a clear understanding of capital flow. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, we examine the common assumption that an open-end "evergreen" fund simply means an infinite runway for capital raising. While the appeal is understandable, sponsors often overlook the mechanics of capital going out. We walk through a practical comparison between closed-end and open-end funds, highlighting how redemption rights can create unexpected valuation hurdles and cash drag when paired with illiquid assets like real estate. Listen in for a plain-English reality check on fund structures and the primary rule of thumb for protecting your investor returns.<p>Also see: Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/M35YzO5UO7Y">https://youtu.be/M35YzO5UO7Y</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a private equity fund and matching it to the liquidity of your assets requires a clear understanding of capital flow. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, we examine the common assumption that an open-end "evergreen" fund simply means an infinite runway for capital raising. While the appeal is understandable, sponsors often overlook the mechanics of capital going out. We walk through a practical comparison between closed-end and open-end funds, highlighting how redemption rights can create unexpected valuation hurdles and cash drag when paired with illiquid assets like real estate. Listen in for a plain-English reality check on fund structures and the primary rule of thumb for protecting your investor returns.<p>Also see: Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/M35YzO5UO7Y">https://youtu.be/M35YzO5UO7Y</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 17:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8189bf3b/6a823dc3.mp3" length="5982787" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M35YzO5UO7Y">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>406</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A field note on the dangerous assumption sponsors make about evergreen funds and why matching your legal structure to your asset liquidity is a critical step in fund formation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A field note on the dangerous assumption sponsors make about evergreen funds and why matching your legal structure to your asset liquidity is a critical step in fund formation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8189bf3b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8189bf3b/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred Equity Disclosures and the Guarantee Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>Preferred Equity Disclosures and the Guarantee Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a867b4e8-9e5c-4c44-bd88-bf02e5b7f9e4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a5be4f90</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Preferred equity in a Regulation D syndication is about priority, not certainty. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a common structural assumption: marketing preferred returns as 'guaranteed' yields. Using a straightforward whiteboard hypothetical, Tilden breaks down how the waterfall works when an 8% Class A share scenario underperforms. You'll learn why standing at the front of the distribution line only matters if the venture generates cash, how to separate preferred returns from returns of capital in your Operating Agreement, and why your Private Placement Memorandum must accurately reflect structural risk. A practical look at structuring for priority while keeping your marketing language aligned with legal reality.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hdDpQ3o9Ir8">https://youtu.be/hdDpQ3o9Ir8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Preferred equity in a Regulation D syndication is about priority, not certainty. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a common structural assumption: marketing preferred returns as 'guaranteed' yields. Using a straightforward whiteboard hypothetical, Tilden breaks down how the waterfall works when an 8% Class A share scenario underperforms. You'll learn why standing at the front of the distribution line only matters if the venture generates cash, how to separate preferred returns from returns of capital in your Operating Agreement, and why your Private Placement Memorandum must accurately reflect structural risk. A practical look at structuring for priority while keeping your marketing language aligned with legal reality.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hdDpQ3o9Ir8">https://youtu.be/hdDpQ3o9Ir8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:50:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a5be4f90/0c51b9e8.mp3" length="5519991" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdDpQ3o9Ir8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>373</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Preferred equity is a powerful tool in a Regulation D syndication, but labeling it as a guaranteed return is a common trap. Tilden breaks down the legal and practical differences between priority and certainty.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Preferred equity is a powerful tool in a Regulation D syndication, but labeling it as a guaranteed return is a common trap. Tilden breaks down the legal and practical differences between priority and certainty.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a5be4f90/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a5be4f90/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Oil Rig Funds: Tax, Liability, and Reg D</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Oil Rig Funds: Tax, Liability, and Reg D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">738a5221-f7d0-4e32-bf70-f9b3c0e49e0f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2c64f27</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring an oil rig fund requires more than a standard boilerplate agreement. Sponsors often assume they can copy and paste the same LLC template used for passive deals, but operating risks demand a different approach. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the single-LLC design can expose investor capital to equipment and environmental liabilities. He breaks down the necessity of isolating the operating company from the issuer, the importance of coordinating with a CPA to ensure tax benefits like IDCs and depletion allowances properly pass through to investors, and how to use the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to plainly disclose commodity and operating risks under Regulation D.<p>Also see: Oil Rig Fund Structure: Liability, Tax, Regulation D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/syCnlkaHPC4">https://youtu.be/syCnlkaHPC4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring an oil rig fund requires more than a standard boilerplate agreement. Sponsors often assume they can copy and paste the same LLC template used for passive deals, but operating risks demand a different approach. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the single-LLC design can expose investor capital to equipment and environmental liabilities. He breaks down the necessity of isolating the operating company from the issuer, the importance of coordinating with a CPA to ensure tax benefits like IDCs and depletion allowances properly pass through to investors, and how to use the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to plainly disclose commodity and operating risks under Regulation D.<p>Also see: Oil Rig Fund Structure: Liability, Tax, Regulation D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/syCnlkaHPC4">https://youtu.be/syCnlkaHPC4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:31:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a2c64f27/1e08c6e7.mp3" length="5902991" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syCnlkaHPC4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>400</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume they can use standard passive LLC templates for operational oil rig funds. Here is why that copy-paste approach can create significant exposure for investor capital, and how to structure the fund properly under Regulation D.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume they can use standard passive LLC templates for operational oil rig funds. Here is why that copy-paste approach can create significant exposure for investor capital, and how to structure the fund properly under Regulation D.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2c64f27/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2c64f27/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unlicensed Finder's Fees and the Rescission Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>Unlicensed Finder's Fees and the Rescission Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc6964a9-3f2f-4a5b-bde4-76483a24beb8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/966b3df5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create significant legal risks if handled incorrectly. A common assumption is that sponsors can pay an unlicensed finder a cut of the raise by simply renaming the payment—calling it a marketing fee, a consulting fee, or setting up a nominal co-GP. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the reality of transaction-based compensation. We explore how paying unlicensed finders triggers broker-dealer rules, the resulting business risk of investor rescission rights, and three clean, legal paths forward to bridge your funding gaps without compromising your offering.<p>Also see: No License to Pay Finder’s Fees in a Reg D Offering — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/N8aW273Ai7Y">https://youtu.be/N8aW273Ai7Y</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create significant legal risks if handled incorrectly. A common assumption is that sponsors can pay an unlicensed finder a cut of the raise by simply renaming the payment—calling it a marketing fee, a consulting fee, or setting up a nominal co-GP. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the reality of transaction-based compensation. We explore how paying unlicensed finders triggers broker-dealer rules, the resulting business risk of investor rescission rights, and three clean, legal paths forward to bridge your funding gaps without compromising your offering.<p>Also see: No License to Pay Finder’s Fees in a Reg D Offering — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/N8aW273Ai7Y">https://youtu.be/N8aW273Ai7Y</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:17:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/966b3df5/d3bd4ba0.mp3" length="5977778" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8aW273Ai7Y">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>406</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Finder's fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create significant legal risks if handled incorrectly. Tilden Moschetti explains why renaming a commission won't bypass broker-dealer rules.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Finder's fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create significant legal risks if handled incorrectly. Tilden Moschetti explains why renaming a commission won't bypass broker-dealer rules.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/966b3df5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/966b3df5/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crypto Projects and Reg D: Why Your Whitepaper is Not a PPM</title>
      <itunes:title>Crypto Projects and Reg D: Why Your Whitepaper is Not a PPM</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2236196-14a0-42b6-9b8d-0b6b44ea02d7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7634ddfc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Many crypto and blockchain founders assume that a detailed technical whitepaper eliminates the need for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses this common misconception when raising capital under Regulation D. While Rule 506(c) may not strictly mandate a PPM for verified accredited investors, relying solely on a whitepaper leaves a significant gap in your disclosure record. Tilden walks through a practical hypothetical to illustrate what happens when founders skip the PPM and Operating Agreement, explaining how anti-fraud rules always apply, regardless of the exemption used. Discover how to use proven legal structures to protect your innovative technology.<p>Also see: Raising Capital for Crypto &amp; Blockchain Projects Under Reg D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-crypto-blockchain-projects-under-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-crypto-blockchain-projects-under-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/ciIA2YgFpEI">https://youtu.be/ciIA2YgFpEI</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many crypto and blockchain founders assume that a detailed technical whitepaper eliminates the need for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses this common misconception when raising capital under Regulation D. While Rule 506(c) may not strictly mandate a PPM for verified accredited investors, relying solely on a whitepaper leaves a significant gap in your disclosure record. Tilden walks through a practical hypothetical to illustrate what happens when founders skip the PPM and Operating Agreement, explaining how anti-fraud rules always apply, regardless of the exemption used. Discover how to use proven legal structures to protect your innovative technology.<p>Also see: Raising Capital for Crypto &amp; Blockchain Projects Under Reg D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-crypto-blockchain-projects-under-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-crypto-blockchain-projects-under-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/ciIA2YgFpEI">https://youtu.be/ciIA2YgFpEI</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:13:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7634ddfc/500de5ea.mp3" length="6480768" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciIA2YgFpEI">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>441</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Raising capital for a blockchain protocol under Regulation D requires more than just a detailed technical whitepaper. In this episode, we explore why treating a marketing document as a Private Placement Memorandum can create significant legal exposure.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Raising capital for a blockchain protocol under Regulation D requires more than just a detailed technical whitepaper. In this episode, we explore why treating a marketing document as a Private Placement Memorandum can create significant legal exposure.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7634ddfc/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7634ddfc/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Reg D for Operating Companies and Debt Funds</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Reg D for Operating Companies and Debt Funds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f4a275c-bbb4-4cbd-ab6e-02ab622412ea</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7f84de73</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring Regulation D capital raises for operating companies and debt funds requires more than just a compelling pitch deck and a handshake. In this field note, we explore the core tension between selling the vision of a business and legally protecting the founders behind it. Tilden Moschetti explains how anti-fraud rules still apply even when a formal Private Placement Memorandum isn't strictly required by the SEC. We also discuss how proper legal structuring ensures founders retain the operational flexibility they need to run their business without requiring constant investor approval.<p>Also see: Regulation D Business Capital Overview: What You Need to Know — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-d-business-capital-overview-what-you-need-to-know/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-d-business-capital-overview-what-you-need-to-know/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hQe_wcZ--Z8">https://youtu.be/hQe_wcZ--Z8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring Regulation D capital raises for operating companies and debt funds requires more than just a compelling pitch deck and a handshake. In this field note, we explore the core tension between selling the vision of a business and legally protecting the founders behind it. Tilden Moschetti explains how anti-fraud rules still apply even when a formal Private Placement Memorandum isn't strictly required by the SEC. We also discuss how proper legal structuring ensures founders retain the operational flexibility they need to run their business without requiring constant investor approval.<p>Also see: Regulation D Business Capital Overview: What You Need to Know — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-d-business-capital-overview-what-you-need-to-know/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/regulation-d-business-capital-overview-what-you-need-to-know/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hQe_wcZ--Z8">https://youtu.be/hQe_wcZ--Z8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:55:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7f84de73/1f7ed9e3.mp3" length="6394465" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQe_wcZ--Z8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>435</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti breaks down how operating companies and debt funds use Regulation D to raise private capital, why relying solely on a pitch deck can create liability, and how to maintain operational control.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti breaks down how operating companies and debt funds use Regulation D to raise private capital, why relying solely on a pitch deck can create liability, and how to maintain operational control.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7f84de73/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7f84de73/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Blind-Pool Transition: When to Start a Real Estate Fund</title>
      <itunes:title>The Blind-Pool Transition: When to Start a Real Estate Fund</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">abd0024c-8873-4eae-b4f7-126afdd62e96</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4ab1277f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Many sponsors assume that forming a real estate fund is simply a syndication with more properties bolted on—a quick way to lock up capital and close deals faster. But as a syndication attorney, Tilden Moschetti often sees the disconnect between the legal request to build a fund and the business reality of raising the capital to fill it. In this episode of Field Notes, we examine the fundamental difference between single-asset syndications and blind-pool funds. We discuss why investors must shift from underwriting a property to underwriting a sponsor, the tension between a sponsor's desire for operational flexibility and an investor's need for a focused mandate, and the clear decision rule for when you should actually make the transition.<p>Also see: How to Start a Real Estate Fund — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-start-a-real-estate-fund-2/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-start-a-real-estate-fund-2/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/HcOglJay9uY">https://youtu.be/HcOglJay9uY</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many sponsors assume that forming a real estate fund is simply a syndication with more properties bolted on—a quick way to lock up capital and close deals faster. But as a syndication attorney, Tilden Moschetti often sees the disconnect between the legal request to build a fund and the business reality of raising the capital to fill it. In this episode of Field Notes, we examine the fundamental difference between single-asset syndications and blind-pool funds. We discuss why investors must shift from underwriting a property to underwriting a sponsor, the tension between a sponsor's desire for operational flexibility and an investor's need for a focused mandate, and the clear decision rule for when you should actually make the transition.<p>Also see: How to Start a Real Estate Fund — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-start-a-real-estate-fund-2/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-start-a-real-estate-fund-2/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/HcOglJay9uY">https://youtu.be/HcOglJay9uY</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:46:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4ab1277f/3f7eedb8.mp3" length="5829760" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcOglJay9uY">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>395</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume creating a blind-pool fund will solve their capital-raising bottlenecks. But building the legal box doesn't fill it. Tilden Moschetti explains the crucial transition from underwriting a property to underwriting a sponsor.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume creating a blind-pool fund will solve their capital-raising bottlenecks. But building the legal box doesn't fill it. Tilden Moschetti explains the crucial transition from underwriting a property to underwriting a sponsor.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4ab1277f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4ab1277f/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Disclosure Record in Debt Fund Capital Raises</title>
      <itunes:title>The Disclosure Record in Debt Fund Capital Raises</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f8ff0a9d-4d73-4ba6-94eb-a19332718717</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ff3f8bd8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Raising capital for a debt fund under Regulation D often comes with a common misconception: that offering a fixed return means you can skip standard securities disclosures. In this field note, we break down why pooling money to lend is still selling a security and requires a proper disclosure record. We discuss the realities of borrower default, the role of the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) in protecting the sponsor, and how to align your distribution mechanics with actual cash flows. As a syndication attorney, Tilden Moschetti walks through a practical hypothetical to show how mandatory fixed-return promises can create unnecessary breaches, and how to structure your fund correctly before accepting the first check.<p>Also see: Raising Capital for a Debt Fund: SEC Compliance and Investor Strategies — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-a-debt-fund-sec-compliance-and-investor-strategies/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-a-debt-fund-sec-compliance-and-investor-strategies/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/wG_hq7FLg-M">https://youtu.be/wG_hq7FLg-M</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Raising capital for a debt fund under Regulation D often comes with a common misconception: that offering a fixed return means you can skip standard securities disclosures. In this field note, we break down why pooling money to lend is still selling a security and requires a proper disclosure record. We discuss the realities of borrower default, the role of the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) in protecting the sponsor, and how to align your distribution mechanics with actual cash flows. As a syndication attorney, Tilden Moschetti walks through a practical hypothetical to show how mandatory fixed-return promises can create unnecessary breaches, and how to structure your fund correctly before accepting the first check.<p>Also see: Raising Capital for a Debt Fund: SEC Compliance and Investor Strategies — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-a-debt-fund-sec-compliance-and-investor-strategies/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-capital-for-a-debt-fund-sec-compliance-and-investor-strategies/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/wG_hq7FLg-M">https://youtu.be/wG_hq7FLg-M</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:16:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ff3f8bd8/0d67628c.mp3" length="5682065" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wG_hq7FLg-M">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>384</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Raising capital for a debt fund under Regulation D doesn't bypass securities laws. Explore why offering a fixed return still requires a robust disclosure record to handle inevitable borrower defaults.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Raising capital for a debt fund under Regulation D doesn't bypass securities laws. Explore why offering a fixed return still requires a robust disclosure record to handle inevitable borrower defaults.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ff3f8bd8/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ff3f8bd8/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debt Fund Structuring: Disclosure, Reg D, and Borrower Risk</title>
      <itunes:title>Debt Fund Structuring: Disclosure, Reg D, and Borrower Risk</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">860c3632-27c0-4c44-a8d2-e7f7786f2eb5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/48cf33dd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When setting up a private debt fund, it is easy to focus entirely on the lending side of the business and forget that raising the capital is a securities offering. In this field note, Tilden Moschetti unpacks the real-world mechanics of structuring a debt fund under Regulation D. We explore the core tension sponsors face when managing borrower default risk versus investor expectations, and why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) acts as a crucial firewall. Topics include the risks of the 'guaranteed yield' trap, the practical setup of fund and manager entities, and why distribution mechanics must clearly track what the fund actually collects.<p>Also see: How to Structure a Debt Fund: Legal, Financial, and Compliance Essentials — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-structure-a-debt-fund-legal-financial-and-compliance-essentials/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-structure-a-debt-fund-legal-financial-and-compliance-essentials/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/G22QapjOpgM">https://youtu.be/G22QapjOpgM</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When setting up a private debt fund, it is easy to focus entirely on the lending side of the business and forget that raising the capital is a securities offering. In this field note, Tilden Moschetti unpacks the real-world mechanics of structuring a debt fund under Regulation D. We explore the core tension sponsors face when managing borrower default risk versus investor expectations, and why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) acts as a crucial firewall. Topics include the risks of the 'guaranteed yield' trap, the practical setup of fund and manager entities, and why distribution mechanics must clearly track what the fund actually collects.<p>Also see: How to Structure a Debt Fund: Legal, Financial, and Compliance Essentials — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-structure-a-debt-fund-legal-financial-and-compliance-essentials/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-structure-a-debt-fund-legal-financial-and-compliance-essentials/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/G22QapjOpgM">https://youtu.be/G22QapjOpgM</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:01:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/48cf33dd/6f0979eb.mp3" length="6137689" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G22QapjOpgM">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>417</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often think of debt funds purely as a lending business, but raising capital for those loans is a securities offering. In this field note, we explore why a Private Placement Memorandum is essential for managing borrower default risk and how to align distribution mechanics with actual fund performance.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often think of debt funds purely as a lending business, but raising capital for those loans is a securities offering. In this field note, we explore why a Private Placement Memorandum is essential for managing borrower default risk and how to ali</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/48cf33dd/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/48cf33dd/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Structural Divide Between Debt Funds and Equity Funds</title>
      <itunes:title>The Structural Divide Between Debt Funds and Equity Funds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d271ceab-e66d-4525-ac86-6ceb07df44d5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e05dfe2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The structural divide between debt funds and equity funds in a Regulation D syndication can create mismatched expectations and flawed legal documents. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the common assumption that a debt fund is just a safer equity fund. Listeners will learn why returns tied to a promissory note can never truly be guaranteed, how the 'owner versus lender' dynamic shifts your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) disclosures, and why traditional equity economics like a promote do not belong in a lending business.<p>Also see: Debt Funds vs. Equity Funds: Understanding the Key Differences — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-funds-vs-equity-funds-understanding-the-key-differences/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-funds-vs-equity-funds-understanding-the-key-differences/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/nhkXqatS_gE">https://youtu.be/nhkXqatS_gE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The structural divide between debt funds and equity funds in a Regulation D syndication can create mismatched expectations and flawed legal documents. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the common assumption that a debt fund is just a safer equity fund. Listeners will learn why returns tied to a promissory note can never truly be guaranteed, how the 'owner versus lender' dynamic shifts your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) disclosures, and why traditional equity economics like a promote do not belong in a lending business.<p>Also see: Debt Funds vs. Equity Funds: Understanding the Key Differences — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-funds-vs-equity-funds-understanding-the-key-differences/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/debt-funds-vs-equity-funds-understanding-the-key-differences/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/nhkXqatS_gE">https://youtu.be/nhkXqatS_gE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 13:40:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1e05dfe2/49be2c67.mp3" length="5354486" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhkXqatS_gE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>361</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The structural divide between debt funds and equity funds in a Regulation D syndication can create confusion for sponsors. In this field note, we explore why a debt fund isn't just a low-risk equity fund, and how the shift from owner to lender changes your disclosures, economics, and legal package.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The structural divide between debt funds and equity funds in a Regulation D syndication can create confusion for sponsors. In this field note, we explore why a debt fund isn't just a low-risk equity fund, and how the shift from owner to lender changes you</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e05dfe2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e05dfe2/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avoiding the 1940 Act: Why Exemption is the Only Path</title>
      <itunes:title>Avoiding the 1940 Act: Why Exemption is the Only Path</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">faf7b3fc-2db8-4b02-b05a-10a6d8ceb3b6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0dda1c3c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Many sponsors assume that locking in a Regulation D exemption means their securities work is complete. But raising the money is only the first hurdle. The second is the Investment Company Act of 1940, which governs what your entity actually does with pooled capital. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the critical difference between capital-raising exemptions and entity exemptions. By walking through a $15 million private equity hypothetical, he illustrates how investor count and wealth standards can accidentally trigger mutual fund-style regulations. Listen to understand why you should establish your 1940 Act exemption before setting your business model, minimums, or drafting your Private Placement Memorandum.<p>Also see: The Investment Company Act Of 1940 From A Syndication Attorney's Perspective — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/investment-company-act-of-1940/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/investment-company-act-of-1940/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/iOiJN-glJ30">https://youtu.be/iOiJN-glJ30</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many sponsors assume that locking in a Regulation D exemption means their securities work is complete. But raising the money is only the first hurdle. The second is the Investment Company Act of 1940, which governs what your entity actually does with pooled capital. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the critical difference between capital-raising exemptions and entity exemptions. By walking through a $15 million private equity hypothetical, he illustrates how investor count and wealth standards can accidentally trigger mutual fund-style regulations. Listen to understand why you should establish your 1940 Act exemption before setting your business model, minimums, or drafting your Private Placement Memorandum.<p>Also see: The Investment Company Act Of 1940 From A Syndication Attorney's Perspective — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/investment-company-act-of-1940/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/investment-company-act-of-1940/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/iOiJN-glJ30">https://youtu.be/iOiJN-glJ30</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:56:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0dda1c3c/3a278313.mp3" length="6148841" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOiJN-glJ30">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>418</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume a Regulation D exemption handles all their securities requirements. In this field note, we explore why pooling capital to buy securities triggers the Investment Company Act of 1940, and why designing for exemption is the most practical strategy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume a Regulation D exemption handles all their securities requirements. In this field note, we explore why pooling capital to buy securities triggers the Investment Company Act of 1940, and why designing for exemption is the most practic</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0dda1c3c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0dda1c3c/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Section 4(a)(2) vs. Reg D: The Safe Harbor Distinction</title>
      <itunes:title>Section 4(a)(2) vs. Reg D: The Safe Harbor Distinction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbf2673c-3ecf-4d7b-b874-a24eba5bddc0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9250778d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Skipping the Regulation D safe harbor for a small Section 4(a)(2) private offering might seem like a cost-saving measure, but it can create significant subjective risk. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the relationship between the Securities Act statutory exemption and the SEC's Regulation D framework. Discover why Section 4(a)(2) acts as the legal theory and Reg D acts as the objective checklist, and learn how utilizing a safe harbor shifts the burden of proof if an investor dispute ever arises.<p>Also see: Section 4(a)(2) vs Reg D - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/section-4a2-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/section-4a2-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0O5Gv6CgLQ0">https://youtu.be/0O5Gv6CgLQ0</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Skipping the Regulation D safe harbor for a small Section 4(a)(2) private offering might seem like a cost-saving measure, but it can create significant subjective risk. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the relationship between the Securities Act statutory exemption and the SEC's Regulation D framework. Discover why Section 4(a)(2) acts as the legal theory and Reg D acts as the objective checklist, and learn how utilizing a safe harbor shifts the burden of proof if an investor dispute ever arises.<p>Also see: Section 4(a)(2) vs Reg D - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/section-4a2-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/section-4a2-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0O5Gv6CgLQ0">https://youtu.be/0O5Gv6CgLQ0</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:39:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9250778d/73646ed9.mp3" length="5279775" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O5Gv6CgLQ0">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>356</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume that small, private deals among friends don't require full Regulation D paperwork. Tilden Moschetti explains the critical difference between the Section 4(a)(2) exemption and the Reg D safe harbor.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume that small, private deals among friends don't require full Regulation D paperwork. Tilden Moschetti explains the critical difference between the Section 4(a)(2) exemption and the Reg D safe harbor.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9250778d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9250778d/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rule 147A vs. Reg D: The Practical Reality of the Intrastate Exemption</title>
      <itunes:title>Rule 147A vs. Reg D: The Practical Reality of the Intrastate Exemption</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">70daae6d-195e-4e65-b2cd-7deb6450098c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/007b1d12</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often view Rule 147A as a 'cheat code' for raising capital from local, non-accredited investors. But does the intrastate exemption actually make raising money easier? In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the practical reality of Rule 147A versus Regulation D. We cover the strict residency requirements of 147A, how a single out-of-state investor can complicate the entire offering, and why optimizing for a nationwide capital pool under Reg D (506b or 506c) is usually the cleaner, more flexible choice. Tune in to understand how to select the legal structure that best fits the reality of your investor network.<p>Also see: Rule 147A vs Reg D Offerings - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-147a-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-147a-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hINBQVSjYE0">https://youtu.be/hINBQVSjYE0</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often view Rule 147A as a 'cheat code' for raising capital from local, non-accredited investors. But does the intrastate exemption actually make raising money easier? In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the practical reality of Rule 147A versus Regulation D. We cover the strict residency requirements of 147A, how a single out-of-state investor can complicate the entire offering, and why optimizing for a nationwide capital pool under Reg D (506b or 506c) is usually the cleaner, more flexible choice. Tune in to understand how to select the legal structure that best fits the reality of your investor network.<p>Also see: Rule 147A vs Reg D Offerings - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-147a-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-147a-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hINBQVSjYE0">https://youtu.be/hINBQVSjYE0</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:12:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/007b1d12/26255178.mp3" length="5275450" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hINBQVSjYE0">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>355</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume Rule 147A is the easiest way to raise capital locally, but strict residency rules can create unexpected administrative hurdles. Discover why Regulation D is often the more practical path.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume Rule 147A is the easiest way to raise capital locally, but strict residency rules can create unexpected administrative hurdles. Discover why Regulation D is often the more practical path.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/007b1d12/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/007b1d12/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reg CF vs. Reg D: The Real Cost of Raising from the Crowd</title>
      <itunes:title>Reg CF vs. Reg D: The Real Cost of Raising from the Crowd</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8bfc7b89-d43e-4b5d-af10-a742acf07887</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/419cfef5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often view Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) as the ultimate marketing tool to reach the general public and close a round faster. But what does the day after the raise actually look like? Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores the operational reality of Reg CF, from mandatory funding portals to the administrative burden of managing hundreds of non-accredited investors. He contrasts this with Regulation D, specifically Rule 506(c), which offers the same public solicitation benefits without the funding caps or portal fees. Learn why choosing your legal structure should be based on how you want to run your company, rather than a short-term marketing advantage.<p>Also see: Reg CF vs Reg D Offerings - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-cf-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-cf-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bGV6FOhAjBQ">https://youtu.be/bGV6FOhAjBQ</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often view Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) as the ultimate marketing tool to reach the general public and close a round faster. But what does the day after the raise actually look like? Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores the operational reality of Reg CF, from mandatory funding portals to the administrative burden of managing hundreds of non-accredited investors. He contrasts this with Regulation D, specifically Rule 506(c), which offers the same public solicitation benefits without the funding caps or portal fees. Learn why choosing your legal structure should be based on how you want to run your company, rather than a short-term marketing advantage.<p>Also see: Reg CF vs Reg D Offerings - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-cf-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-cf-vs-reg-d-offerings-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bGV6FOhAjBQ">https://youtu.be/bGV6FOhAjBQ</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:52:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/419cfef5/d9dd5215.mp3" length="4488859" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGV6FOhAjBQ">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>299</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) is the ultimate marketing tool to blast a deal to the public. But is the crowd worth the cost? Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the administrative reality of managing hundreds of small checks versus the scalable power of Regulation D.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) is the ultimate marketing tool to blast a deal to the public. But is the crowd worth the cost? Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the administrative reality of managing hundreds of smal</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/419cfef5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/419cfef5/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reg A vs. Reg D: The Real Cost and Timeline Tradeoffs</title>
      <itunes:title>Reg A vs. Reg D: The Real Cost and Timeline Tradeoffs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9473bce-ccda-46a1-9466-e1b501d18af0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5efbc236</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the practical tradeoffs between Regulation A and Regulation D. Sponsors often assume Reg A is the ideal path because it allows public advertising to non-accredited retail investors. But the practical reality involves audited financials, high upfront costs, and months of waiting for SEC qualification. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why Rule 506(c) under Regulation D is usually the smarter, faster alternative for sponsors who want the ability to advertise openly without the friction of a mini public offering.<p>Also see: Reg A vs Reg D Offerings - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-a-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-a-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/GI44PMgZK6g">https://youtu.be/GI44PMgZK6g</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the practical tradeoffs between Regulation A and Regulation D. Sponsors often assume Reg A is the ideal path because it allows public advertising to non-accredited retail investors. But the practical reality involves audited financials, high upfront costs, and months of waiting for SEC qualification. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why Rule 506(c) under Regulation D is usually the smarter, faster alternative for sponsors who want the ability to advertise openly without the friction of a mini public offering.<p>Also see: Reg A vs Reg D Offerings - Comparing Syndication Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-a-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-a-vs-reg-d-comparing-syndication-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/GI44PMgZK6g">https://youtu.be/GI44PMgZK6g</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:32:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5efbc236/508c0f75.mp3" length="5840326" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI44PMgZK6g">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>396</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors view Regulation A as the ideal structure because it allows public advertising to non-accredited investors. However, they often overlook the rigorous SEC qualification process. In this field note, we break down the practical tradeoffs between Reg A and Reg D.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors view Regulation A as the ideal structure because it allows public advertising to non-accredited investors. However, they often overlook the rigorous SEC qualification process. In this field note, we break down the practical tradeoffs between</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5efbc236/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5efbc236/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 15-Day Form D Deadline and the SEC 'Approval' Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>The 15-Day Form D Deadline and the SEC 'Approval' Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9bdbe67f-5b5a-4ccf-9693-239049575742</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4b68f2d6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Filing a Form D in a Regulation D syndication is a routine requirement, but it is often surrounded by two misconceptions that can trip up sponsors. First, filing a Form D does not mean the SEC has vetted or approved your deal—it is simply a notice filing. Second, the rigid 15-day filing deadline starts ticking the moment your very first investor is legally committed, not when your round closes.

In this field note, we break down the reality of Form D, the definition of a 'first sale,' and how missing this early deadline can create cascading compliance issues across multiple state Blue Sky filings.

Listen to learn:
• Why Form D is just a 'postcard' to the SEC.
• The danger of claiming 'SEC approved' in a pitch deck.
• How the 15-calendar-day clock works in practice.
• Why tracking your first investor is the most critical date in your early raise.<p>Also see: SEC Form D: Everything You Need to Know — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/r1Jd40rHv4w">https://youtu.be/r1Jd40rHv4w</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Filing a Form D in a Regulation D syndication is a routine requirement, but it is often surrounded by two misconceptions that can trip up sponsors. First, filing a Form D does not mean the SEC has vetted or approved your deal—it is simply a notice filing. Second, the rigid 15-day filing deadline starts ticking the moment your very first investor is legally committed, not when your round closes.

In this field note, we break down the reality of Form D, the definition of a 'first sale,' and how missing this early deadline can create cascading compliance issues across multiple state Blue Sky filings.

Listen to learn:
• Why Form D is just a 'postcard' to the SEC.
• The danger of claiming 'SEC approved' in a pitch deck.
• How the 15-calendar-day clock works in practice.
• Why tracking your first investor is the most critical date in your early raise.<p>Also see: SEC Form D: Everything You Need to Know — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/r1Jd40rHv4w">https://youtu.be/r1Jd40rHv4w</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:12:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4b68f2d6/0f4552de.mp3" length="4645865" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1Jd40rHv4w">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>310</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A brief field note on why Form D is just a notice filing, not an SEC approval, and how misunderstanding the 15-day deadline can trigger a cascade of late state filings.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A brief field note on why Form D is just a notice filing, not an SEC approval, and how misunderstanding the 15-day deadline can trigger a cascade of late state filings.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4b68f2d6/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4b68f2d6/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Minimum Structure and Economics of a First Syndication</title>
      <itunes:title>The Minimum Structure and Economics of a First Syndication</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d99c0377-6123-4bf9-9de0-5663ddbd5dd3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a386f391</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors structuring their first real estate syndication often assume a small group of friendly investors means they can skip the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and promise a 'guaranteed' return. The instinct to save costs is understandable, but it can create significant legal exposure. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the baseline architecture of a proper real estate offering. We cover the dual-LLC structure, why a disclosure record protects the sponsor even in exempt deals, and the critical distinction between a preferred return and a guarantee. Through a practical hypothetical involving a burst pipe and paused distributions, learn how properly defining the return of capital, preferred return, fees, and promote protects the deal when things don't go according to plan.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication 101 - Attorneys, LLCs, and Fees — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-faqs/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-faqs/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/fncgU71FUOY">https://youtu.be/fncgU71FUOY</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors structuring their first real estate syndication often assume a small group of friendly investors means they can skip the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and promise a 'guaranteed' return. The instinct to save costs is understandable, but it can create significant legal exposure. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the baseline architecture of a proper real estate offering. We cover the dual-LLC structure, why a disclosure record protects the sponsor even in exempt deals, and the critical distinction between a preferred return and a guarantee. Through a practical hypothetical involving a burst pipe and paused distributions, learn how properly defining the return of capital, preferred return, fees, and promote protects the deal when things don't go according to plan.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication 101 - Attorneys, LLCs, and Fees — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-faqs/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-faqs/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/fncgU71FUOY">https://youtu.be/fncgU71FUOY</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:03:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a386f391/dba4a298.mp3" length="6431736" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fncgU71FUOY">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>438</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors structuring their first real estate syndication often assume a small group of friendly investors means they can skip formal disclosures and promise a "guaranteed" return. This episode breaks down the baseline structure you need and why casual economic language can create serious legal exposure.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors structuring their first real estate syndication often assume a small group of friendly investors means they can skip formal disclosures and promise a "guaranteed" return. This episode breaks down the baseline structure you need and why casual eco</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a386f391/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a386f391/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Preferred Return is Priority, Not a Guarantee</title>
      <itunes:title>The Preferred Return is Priority, Not a Guarantee</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39b18bde-f6de-4fce-936f-7d5aee028104</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d141759c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In a Regulation D syndication, the way you explain your deal economics matters. Sponsors frequently blur fees and the promote, or mistakenly label the preferred return as a 'guaranteed yield' to attract investors. This field note explores the tension between pitching an attractive deal and accurately describing equity risk. We break down the four buckets of syndication economics—fees, preferred return, return of capital, and the promote—and explain why the preferred return is a description of priority, not a promise. Tune in to learn how to align your pitch deck with your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Operating Agreement for a clean, professional presentation that builds investor trust.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Fees — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fees/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fees/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/adWBi29iGbE">https://youtu.be/adWBi29iGbE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In a Regulation D syndication, the way you explain your deal economics matters. Sponsors frequently blur fees and the promote, or mistakenly label the preferred return as a 'guaranteed yield' to attract investors. This field note explores the tension between pitching an attractive deal and accurately describing equity risk. We break down the four buckets of syndication economics—fees, preferred return, return of capital, and the promote—and explain why the preferred return is a description of priority, not a promise. Tune in to learn how to align your pitch deck with your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Operating Agreement for a clean, professional presentation that builds investor trust.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Fees — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fees/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fees/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/adWBi29iGbE">https://youtu.be/adWBi29iGbE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:40:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d141759c/88d3f781.mp3" length="5253241" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adWBi29iGbE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>354</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Calling a preferred return a 'guaranteed yield' is a common pitch deck mistake that turns an equity position into a debt promise. In this field note, we break down how to structure and explain your deal economics clearly using the four buckets of syndication.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Calling a preferred return a 'guaranteed yield' is a common pitch deck mistake that turns an equity position into a debt promise. In this field note, we break down how to structure and explain your deal economics clearly using the four buckets of syndicat</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d141759c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d141759c/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Generic Legal Counsel Trap in Syndication</title>
      <itunes:title>The Generic Legal Counsel Trap in Syndication</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a73e6fb-d73d-472b-a90d-923eb696d3b4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fc7737e6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often try to save on legal fees by relying on a standard closing attorney or a boilerplate LLC template to structure their raise. But a syndication combines two completely different legal frameworks: buying the real estate and selling the securities to fund it. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the operational trap of using generic legal counsel. We examine the practical reality of Private Placement Memorandums (PPMs) beyond just the regulatory checklist, and walk through a hypothetical scenario where standard boilerplate accidentally hands deal control to passive investors. Tune in to understand how a dedicated specialist protects your disclosure record looking backward, and secures your operational authority looking forward.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Attorneys: Do You Need One? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-attorney/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-attorney/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/UartYIAKWnE">https://youtu.be/UartYIAKWnE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often try to save on legal fees by relying on a standard closing attorney or a boilerplate LLC template to structure their raise. But a syndication combines two completely different legal frameworks: buying the real estate and selling the securities to fund it. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the operational trap of using generic legal counsel. We examine the practical reality of Private Placement Memorandums (PPMs) beyond just the regulatory checklist, and walk through a hypothetical scenario where standard boilerplate accidentally hands deal control to passive investors. Tune in to understand how a dedicated specialist protects your disclosure record looking backward, and secures your operational authority looking forward.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Attorneys: Do You Need One? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-attorney/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-attorney/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/UartYIAKWnE">https://youtu.be/UartYIAKWnE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:20:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fc7737e6/abc9ed1f.mp3" length="5123739" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UartYIAKWnE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>345</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Understanding the practical difference between a real estate closing attorney and a syndication attorney, and why generic legal templates can restrict your deal's flexibility.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Understanding the practical difference between a real estate closing attorney and a syndication attorney, and why generic legal templates can restrict your deal's flexibility.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fc7737e6/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fc7737e6/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reg D Bad Actor Rule: Covered Persons and Rule 506(d)</title>
      <itunes:title>The Reg D Bad Actor Rule: Covered Persons and Rule 506(d)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10f924e6-7d88-43ff-9652-ec2635e27915</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d1bc76a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors raising capital privately under Regulation D often assume that a clean personal record is enough to keep their offering compliant. But Rule 506(d)—the Bad Actor rule—looks far beyond the lead GP. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains who actually qualifies as a 'covered person' and why relying on trust rather than paperwork can jeopardize your exemption from day one.

Listen to learn:
• The definition of disqualifying events and covered persons under Rule 506(d).
• Why introducing promoters or twenty-percent owners into your structure requires strict vetting.
• The practical mechanics of losing a 506 exemption (rescission and regulatory exposure).
• Why a signed Bad Actor Questionnaire is a necessary step before launching any raise.<p>Also see: The Reg D Bad Actor Rule: Rule 506d — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-bad-actor-rule/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-bad-actor-rule/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/9QhF2m73ATw">https://youtu.be/9QhF2m73ATw</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors raising capital privately under Regulation D often assume that a clean personal record is enough to keep their offering compliant. But Rule 506(d)—the Bad Actor rule—looks far beyond the lead GP. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains who actually qualifies as a 'covered person' and why relying on trust rather than paperwork can jeopardize your exemption from day one.

Listen to learn:
• The definition of disqualifying events and covered persons under Rule 506(d).
• Why introducing promoters or twenty-percent owners into your structure requires strict vetting.
• The practical mechanics of losing a 506 exemption (rescission and regulatory exposure).
• Why a signed Bad Actor Questionnaire is a necessary step before launching any raise.<p>Also see: The Reg D Bad Actor Rule: Rule 506d — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-bad-actor-rule/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-bad-actor-rule/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/9QhF2m73ATw">https://youtu.be/9QhF2m73ATw</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:58:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2d1bc76a/e2499bf3.mp3" length="5471388" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QhF2m73ATw">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>369</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti breaks down the Regulation D Bad Actor rule, explaining why a lead sponsor's clean background isn't enough to protect the offering if other covered persons carry disqualifying events.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti breaks down the Regulation D Bad Actor rule, explaining why a lead sponsor's clean background isn't enough to protect the offering if other covered persons carry disqualifying events.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d1bc76a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d1bc76a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Industry Myth in Reg D Offerings</title>
      <itunes:title>The Industry Myth in Reg D Offerings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df9fe1e5-aae6-4b5a-a45b-9e704a91464d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2ce88ad3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does your operating business need a custom legal structure to raise private capital? Many founders assume Regulation D is only for real estate. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti tackles the industry myth surrounding private offerings. He explains why tech startups, debt funds, and logistics companies use the exact same Regulation D exemptions (Rule 506b and 506c) as real estate sponsors. You will learn why Reg D is simply the rulebook for 'the ask,' and how standard Private Placement Memorandums and Operating Agreements adapt to fit your specific business facts. Tune in to understand why you should stop trying to invent a new way to raise money and focus on your business pitch instead.<p>Also see: What Industries Raise Capital With Reg D? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/industries-using-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/industries-using-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/InOljBLImIA">https://youtu.be/InOljBLImIA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does your operating business need a custom legal structure to raise private capital? Many founders assume Regulation D is only for real estate. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti tackles the industry myth surrounding private offerings. He explains why tech startups, debt funds, and logistics companies use the exact same Regulation D exemptions (Rule 506b and 506c) as real estate sponsors. You will learn why Reg D is simply the rulebook for 'the ask,' and how standard Private Placement Memorandums and Operating Agreements adapt to fit your specific business facts. Tune in to understand why you should stop trying to invent a new way to raise money and focus on your business pitch instead.<p>Also see: What Industries Raise Capital With Reg D? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/industries-using-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/industries-using-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/InOljBLImIA">https://youtu.be/InOljBLImIA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:38:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2ce88ad3/68219720.mp3" length="4543158" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InOljBLImIA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>303</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Founders often assume Regulation D is exclusively for real estate. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how operating businesses and startups use the exact same framework to raise private capital.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Founders often assume Regulation D is exclusively for real estate. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how operating businesses and startups use the exact same framework to raise private capital.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2ce88ad3/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2ce88ad3/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rule 501 Accredited Investor Thresholds</title>
      <itunes:title>The Rule 501 Accredited Investor Thresholds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c736a27-3217-4281-9817-82541511255d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/545a0ad7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often memorize the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds and assume that covers their compliance obligations under Regulation D. But knowing the definition is just the starting line. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the critical distinction between defining an accredited investor and proving that status. We walk through the specific income and net worth tests, including the primary residence exclusion and the professional license pathways. From there, we address the core operational tension: why the exact same investor requires a simple self-certification checkbox for a Rule 506(b) offering, but rigorous third-party verification for a Rule 506(c) offering.<p>Also see: What is an Accredited Investor under Reg D Rule 501? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-definition/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-definition/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/mLv1B8kB3iA">https://youtu.be/mLv1B8kB3iA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often memorize the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds and assume that covers their compliance obligations under Regulation D. But knowing the definition is just the starting line. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti explains the critical distinction between defining an accredited investor and proving that status. We walk through the specific income and net worth tests, including the primary residence exclusion and the professional license pathways. From there, we address the core operational tension: why the exact same investor requires a simple self-certification checkbox for a Rule 506(b) offering, but rigorous third-party verification for a Rule 506(c) offering.<p>Also see: What is an Accredited Investor under Reg D Rule 501? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-definition/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-definition/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/mLv1B8kB3iA">https://youtu.be/mLv1B8kB3iA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:18:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/545a0ad7/b0b3016b.mp3" length="5306107" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLv1B8kB3iA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>357</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often memorize the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds, but knowing the numbers is only the starting line. In this episode, a syndication attorney explains the critical difference between an investor meeting the definition and how you must prove their status under Rule 506(b) versus 506(c).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often memorize the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds, but knowing the numbers is only the starting line. In this episode, a syndication attorney explains the critical difference between an investor meeting the definition and how you must pr</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/545a0ad7/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/545a0ad7/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Crypto and Web 3.0 Offerings Under Regulation D</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Crypto and Web 3.0 Offerings Under Regulation D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ee8fc8f-abef-428d-a346-9af2035aee9e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f0d80d06</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this episode, we address the common assumption that crypto and Web 3.0 projects are exempt from securities regulations. Raising capital for a digital token or mining operation under Regulation D provides a reliable framework to bring in investor funds while continuing to build the business. We discuss how to evaluate whether a digital asset qualifies as a security, the practical differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) when soliciting investors online, and why a hyper-customized Private Placement Memorandum is a necessity for disclosing the unique, volatile risks of digital assets. As a syndication attorney, Tilden outlines the steps to structure your raise accurately so you can stop worrying about legal loopholes and focus entirely on your project.<p>Also see: Using Reg D for Crypto Funds, Coins, Mines, and Web 3.0 Businesses — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-crypto/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-crypto/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/qUxnsVb7ON0">https://youtu.be/qUxnsVb7ON0</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this episode, we address the common assumption that crypto and Web 3.0 projects are exempt from securities regulations. Raising capital for a digital token or mining operation under Regulation D provides a reliable framework to bring in investor funds while continuing to build the business. We discuss how to evaluate whether a digital asset qualifies as a security, the practical differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) when soliciting investors online, and why a hyper-customized Private Placement Memorandum is a necessity for disclosing the unique, volatile risks of digital assets. As a syndication attorney, Tilden outlines the steps to structure your raise accurately so you can stop worrying about legal loopholes and focus entirely on your project.<p>Also see: Using Reg D for Crypto Funds, Coins, Mines, and Web 3.0 Businesses — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-crypto/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-crypto/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/qUxnsVb7ON0">https://youtu.be/qUxnsVb7ON0</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f0d80d06/f8858d38.mp3" length="6518632" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUxnsVb7ON0">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors of crypto and Web 3.0 projects often assume their decentralized tokens fall outside of securities law. In this field note, we explore why this assumption is flawed and how to properly structure a digital asset raise under Regulation D.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors of crypto and Web 3.0 projects often assume their decentralized tokens fall outside of securities law. In this field note, we explore why this assumption is flawed and how to properly structure a digital asset raise under Regulation D.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f0d80d06/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f0d80d06/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Reg D for Operating Companies</title>
      <itunes:title>Using Reg D for Operating Companies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d28b4a4-cd68-4a8f-af72-de99967881d0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9129d77a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Founders raising capital for operating companies often assume they are simply 'bringing on partners.' But if you are issuing equity for capital, you are selling a security. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses the misconception that Regulation D is only for real estate. We discuss how tech startups, logistics businesses, and service companies can use Rule 506(b) and 506(c) to raise money. You will learn why the exemption you choose depends entirely on how you find investors, and why repurposing a real estate Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) template can compromise your disclosure record.<p>Also see: Using Reg D to Raise Capital for a Business — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-business-capital/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-business-capital/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/1fHO1wGTYYo">https://youtu.be/1fHO1wGTYYo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Founders raising capital for operating companies often assume they are simply 'bringing on partners.' But if you are issuing equity for capital, you are selling a security. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses the misconception that Regulation D is only for real estate. We discuss how tech startups, logistics businesses, and service companies can use Rule 506(b) and 506(c) to raise money. You will learn why the exemption you choose depends entirely on how you find investors, and why repurposing a real estate Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) template can compromise your disclosure record.<p>Also see: Using Reg D to Raise Capital for a Business — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-business-capital/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-business-capital/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/1fHO1wGTYYo">https://youtu.be/1fHO1wGTYYo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 03:38:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9129d77a/b255616a.mp3" length="5062902" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fHO1wGTYYo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>340</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Founders often assume Regulation D is strictly for real estate syndications. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why issuing equity in any operating company is a securities offering and how to build the right legal framework.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Founders often assume Regulation D is strictly for real estate syndications. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why issuing equity in any operating company is a securities offering and how to build the right legal framework</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9129d77a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9129d77a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Reg D Economics for Private Equity and Hedge Funds</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Reg D Economics for Private Equity and Hedge Funds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">031822f7-a6cc-4a1a-882d-464252e268fe</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/038152c0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring the economics of a private equity or hedge fund under Regulation D requires more than just picking an SEC rule and pitching a standard return. In this episode, Tilden Moschetti explores the confusion that happens when sponsors blur distinct concepts like preferred returns and return of capital. Using a hypothetical blind-pool fund, we walk through the exact definitions of management fees, preferred returns, and carried interest. Listen in to understand why getting the waterfall—the precise priority of payments—clearly mapped out in your Operating Agreement can prevent investor disputes and keep your fund running smoothly.<p>Also see: Reg D for Private Equity and Hedge Funds — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-private-equity-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-private-equity-funds/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/5Z3c18I7p7E">https://youtu.be/5Z3c18I7p7E</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring the economics of a private equity or hedge fund under Regulation D requires more than just picking an SEC rule and pitching a standard return. In this episode, Tilden Moschetti explores the confusion that happens when sponsors blur distinct concepts like preferred returns and return of capital. Using a hypothetical blind-pool fund, we walk through the exact definitions of management fees, preferred returns, and carried interest. Listen in to understand why getting the waterfall—the precise priority of payments—clearly mapped out in your Operating Agreement can prevent investor disputes and keep your fund running smoothly.<p>Also see: Reg D for Private Equity and Hedge Funds — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-private-equity-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-private-equity-funds/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/5Z3c18I7p7E">https://youtu.be/5Z3c18I7p7E</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 03:18:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/038152c0/fc681044.mp3" length="5851134" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z3c18I7p7E">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>396</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often pitch an '8% return and a 20% cut' without clearly defining the mechanics. In this field note, we explore why blurring concepts like preferred returns and return of capital can create major legal and accounting issues down the line.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often pitch an '8% return and a 20% cut' without clearly defining the mechanics. In this field note, we explore why blurring concepts like preferred returns and return of capital can create major legal and accounting issues down the line.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/038152c0/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/038152c0/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PPM Trap in All-Accredited Reg D Deals</title>
      <itunes:title>The PPM Trap in All-Accredited Reg D Deals</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">087ed362-48de-47b7-9541-f19542216469</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a6e643f2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When raising capital strictly from accredited investors in a Regulation D offering, many sponsors assume they can skip a formal Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and rely entirely on a pitch deck. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the practical reality behind this common assumption. While Regulation D exempts your offering from SEC registration, it does not exempt you from anti-fraud rules. Listen as we walk through a real estate development hypothetical to understand why proving what you disclosed is just as important as the deal itself, and how a PPM functions as your central disclosure record.<p>Also see: Using Reg D for Real Estate Syndications and Development — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/8p2P9MguTWo">https://youtu.be/8p2P9MguTWo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When raising capital strictly from accredited investors in a Regulation D offering, many sponsors assume they can skip a formal Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and rely entirely on a pitch deck. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the practical reality behind this common assumption. While Regulation D exempts your offering from SEC registration, it does not exempt you from anti-fraud rules. Listen as we walk through a real estate development hypothetical to understand why proving what you disclosed is just as important as the deal itself, and how a PPM functions as your central disclosure record.<p>Also see: Using Reg D for Real Estate Syndications and Development — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/8p2P9MguTWo">https://youtu.be/8p2P9MguTWo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:58:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a6e643f2/3e53ef03.mp3" length="5361458" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8p2P9MguTWo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>361</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume that raising capital strictly from accredited investors means they can skip a formal PPM. In this field note, we explore why relying on a pitch deck leaves you exposed under anti-fraud rules and why a centralized disclosure record matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume that raising capital strictly from accredited investors means they can skip a formal PPM. In this field note, we explore why relying on a pitch deck leaves you exposed under anti-fraud rules and why a centralized disclosure record ma</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a6e643f2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a6e643f2/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advertising Under Rule 506(c) and the Verification Tradeoff</title>
      <itunes:title>Advertising Under Rule 506(c) and the Verification Tradeoff</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d10462cb-db7e-49c6-b72f-1ed97c7db317</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/22b20067</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When sponsors use Rule 506(c) to advertise their deals, they often assume they can rely on the same check-the-box investor questionnaires they used for 506(b). In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the self-certification questionnaire doesn't meet 506(c) verification requirements and how to manage the resulting sales friction when asking new internet leads for financial documents. He also tackles the misconception that an all-accredited investor mix means you can skip drafting a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), illustrating why the anti-fraud rules make proper disclosure documents essential for every deal.<p>Also see: Rule 506c of Reg D – Solicitation &amp; No Non-Accredited Investors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506c-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506c-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/1dieabYJQIg">https://youtu.be/1dieabYJQIg</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When sponsors use Rule 506(c) to advertise their deals, they often assume they can rely on the same check-the-box investor questionnaires they used for 506(b). In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the self-certification questionnaire doesn't meet 506(c) verification requirements and how to manage the resulting sales friction when asking new internet leads for financial documents. He also tackles the misconception that an all-accredited investor mix means you can skip drafting a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), illustrating why the anti-fraud rules make proper disclosure documents essential for every deal.<p>Also see: Rule 506c of Reg D – Solicitation &amp; No Non-Accredited Investors — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506c-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506c-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/1dieabYJQIg">https://youtu.be/1dieabYJQIg</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:42:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/22b20067/a3601b12.mp3" length="7138914" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dieabYJQIg">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>488</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rule 506(c) allows syndicators to advertise their deals, but it comes with a strict tradeoff: the self-certification questionnaire is no longer enough. Tilden Moschetti explains the verification friction of 506(c) and why skipping a PPM is a practical mistake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rule 506(c) allows syndicators to advertise their deals, but it comes with a strict tradeoff: the self-certification questionnaire is no longer enough. Tilden Moschetti explains the verification friction of 506(c) and why skipping a PPM is a practical mis</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/22b20067/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/22b20067/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The State Compliance Trap of Rule 504</title>
      <itunes:title>The State Compliance Trap of Rule 504</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12f1618b-cdff-4f7f-8f95-027096a1483a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/952bb9a5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often see the $10 million cap on Rule 504 of Regulation D and assume it’s the easiest path for a smaller raise. But choosing an exemption based on dollar amount rather than investor geography can create significant administrative friction. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the lack of federal preemption in Rule 504 means sponsors must navigate individual blue sky laws in every state where an investor resides. Discover why Rule 506(b) usually offers a cleaner, more predictable framework for multi-state private offerings.<p>Also see: Rule 504 of Reg D - The Former Heavyweight Syndication Champ — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-504-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-504-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/by5z1XqHpp4">https://youtu.be/by5z1XqHpp4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often see the $10 million cap on Rule 504 of Regulation D and assume it’s the easiest path for a smaller raise. But choosing an exemption based on dollar amount rather than investor geography can create significant administrative friction. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the lack of federal preemption in Rule 504 means sponsors must navigate individual blue sky laws in every state where an investor resides. Discover why Rule 506(b) usually offers a cleaner, more predictable framework for multi-state private offerings.<p>Also see: Rule 504 of Reg D - The Former Heavyweight Syndication Champ — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-504-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-504-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/by5z1XqHpp4">https://youtu.be/by5z1XqHpp4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:18:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/952bb9a5/c2eb7bdb.mp3" length="5562950" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=by5z1XqHpp4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>376</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Choosing a Regulation D exemption based solely on a smaller dollar amount instead of investor geography can create unexpected administrative friction. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the $10 million cap of Rule 504 often masks a heavy state-by-state compliance burden.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Choosing a Regulation D exemption based solely on a smaller dollar amount instead of investor geography can create unexpected administrative friction. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why the $10 million cap of Rule 504 often masks a heavy s</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/952bb9a5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/952bb9a5/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rule 501 Definition vs. The 506(c) Verification Trap</title>
      <itunes:title>The Rule 501 Definition vs. The 506(c) Verification Trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5338268f-7e12-4b98-b160-5870eb18488b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/85970635</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds and the practical difference between defining an accredited investor and verifying one. Sponsors often assume a quick checkbox on a subscription agreement is always enough, but relying on self-certification during a 506(c) raise can create compliance issues. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti walks through the income math, net worth exclusions, knowledge-based license routes, and the critical operational differences between 506(b) and 506(c) proof requirements.<p>Also see: Rule 501 of Reg D: Accredited Investors and Definitions — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-501-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-501-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/iVZnN4Ti2qo">https://youtu.be/iVZnN4Ti2qo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds and the practical difference between defining an accredited investor and verifying one. Sponsors often assume a quick checkbox on a subscription agreement is always enough, but relying on self-certification during a 506(c) raise can create compliance issues. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti walks through the income math, net worth exclusions, knowledge-based license routes, and the critical operational differences between 506(b) and 506(c) proof requirements.<p>Also see: Rule 501 of Reg D: Accredited Investors and Definitions — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-501-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-501-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/iVZnN4Ti2qo">https://youtu.be/iVZnN4Ti2qo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 01:59:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/85970635/0d83f6af.mp3" length="6437030" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVZnN4Ti2qo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>438</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A brief look at the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds and why confusing the definition with the proof can create unnecessary problems in a 506(c) offering.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A brief look at the Rule 501 accredited investor thresholds and why confusing the definition with the proof can create unnecessary problems in a 506(c) offering.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/85970635/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/85970635/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reg D Menu: Why You Only Really Have Two Choices</title>
      <itunes:title>The Reg D Menu: Why You Only Really Have Two Choices</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cbd8dec6-ec8e-467a-99e8-d64ed4bae3a7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9c3359f9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often view Regulation D as a menu where they can pick and choose elements for their capital raise. But wanting both broad marketing reach and the ability to accept unaccredited investors creates a fundamental conflict. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why Regulation D is really a binary choice: Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c). You'll learn the practical tradeoffs between relying on a pre-existing network versus taking on the friction of formal accredited investor verification. You will also learn why the seemingly attractive Rule 504 usually results in state-level compliance headaches. Evaluate your investor base, pick your lane, and structure your offering with clarity.<p>Also see: Reg D Rules: Rule 506, 501, 504, and beyond — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-rules/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-rules/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/eTAGHvoSla8">https://youtu.be/eTAGHvoSla8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often view Regulation D as a menu where they can pick and choose elements for their capital raise. But wanting both broad marketing reach and the ability to accept unaccredited investors creates a fundamental conflict. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why Regulation D is really a binary choice: Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c). You'll learn the practical tradeoffs between relying on a pre-existing network versus taking on the friction of formal accredited investor verification. You will also learn why the seemingly attractive Rule 504 usually results in state-level compliance headaches. Evaluate your investor base, pick your lane, and structure your offering with clarity.<p>Also see: Reg D Rules: Rule 506, 501, 504, and beyond — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-rules/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-rules/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/eTAGHvoSla8">https://youtu.be/eTAGHvoSla8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 01:39:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9c3359f9/1bbeedf6.mp3" length="5523298" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTAGHvoSla8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>373</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often view Regulation D as a buffet where they can mix and match elements for their capital raise. This episode breaks down why you really only have two practical paths—Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c)—and how to choose between them.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often view Regulation D as a buffet where they can mix and match elements for their capital raise. This episode breaks down why you really only have two practical paths—Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c)—and how to choose between them.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9c3359f9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9c3359f9/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crowdfunding Platforms vs. Direct Syndication: The Control Tradeoff</title>
      <itunes:title>Crowdfunding Platforms vs. Direct Syndication: The Control Tradeoff</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8d9187b5-fe3c-4db3-8a42-2f600de126ab</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c9aa1512</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Choosing between a direct syndication and an online crowdfunding platform is a foundational decision that dictates the future of your capital raising business. Often, sponsors assume both are simply different names for pooling investor money. This episode explores the structural difference between running your own Regulation D syndication and pushing your deal through a crowdfunding portal. We break down the mechanics of raising capital through both routes, highlighting the administrative realities of managing hundreds of small checks from a portal versus executing a targeted 506(c) raise. Ultimately, the choice comes down to control: one structure builds a platform's business, while the other builds your own long-term investor list.<p>Also see: Real Estate Crowdfunding vs. Syndication: What’s the Difference? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/uzKl3BclMHE">https://youtu.be/uzKl3BclMHE</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Choosing between a direct syndication and an online crowdfunding platform is a foundational decision that dictates the future of your capital raising business. Often, sponsors assume both are simply different names for pooling investor money. This episode explores the structural difference between running your own Regulation D syndication and pushing your deal through a crowdfunding portal. We break down the mechanics of raising capital through both routes, highlighting the administrative realities of managing hundreds of small checks from a portal versus executing a targeted 506(c) raise. Ultimately, the choice comes down to control: one structure builds a platform's business, while the other builds your own long-term investor list.<p>Also see: Real Estate Crowdfunding vs. Syndication: What’s the Difference? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/uzKl3BclMHE">https://youtu.be/uzKl3BclMHE</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 01:19:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c9aa1512/971096ea.mp3" length="5008952" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzKl3BclMHE">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>336</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume crowdfunding and syndication are just two words for the same thing. In this field note, we explore the structural difference between running your own Regulation D syndication and pushing your deal through a crowdfunding portal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume crowdfunding and syndication are just two words for the same thing. In this field note, we explore the structural difference between running your own Regulation D syndication and pushing your deal through a crowdfunding portal.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c9aa1512/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c9aa1512/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring a Real Estate Syndication Under Regulation D</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring a Real Estate Syndication Under Regulation D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f1c07b2-e171-4f10-8de0-6cd556ea66b0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1b61b53</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a real estate syndication under Regulation D requires careful attention to disclosure, even when dealing exclusively with accredited investors. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a frequent point of confusion for sponsors: the belief that an LLC operating agreement is sufficient for accredited investor raises. By examining the mechanics of Regulation D, Rule 506(b), and Rule 506(c), Tilden outlines why a passive real estate investment is legally a security, and why the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is a critical tool for documenting risk disclosure. Through a practical hypothetical involving an industrial property, listeners will learn how the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement work together to manage expectations and provide operational flexibility.<p>Also see: How To Syndicate Real Estate — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-syndicate-real-estate/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-syndicate-real-estate/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/AlXbHAUqVhs">https://youtu.be/AlXbHAUqVhs</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a real estate syndication under Regulation D requires careful attention to disclosure, even when dealing exclusively with accredited investors. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a frequent point of confusion for sponsors: the belief that an LLC operating agreement is sufficient for accredited investor raises. By examining the mechanics of Regulation D, Rule 506(b), and Rule 506(c), Tilden outlines why a passive real estate investment is legally a security, and why the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is a critical tool for documenting risk disclosure. Through a practical hypothetical involving an industrial property, listeners will learn how the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement work together to manage expectations and provide operational flexibility.<p>Also see: How To Syndicate Real Estate — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-syndicate-real-estate/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-syndicate-real-estate/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/AlXbHAUqVhs">https://youtu.be/AlXbHAUqVhs</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:58:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c1b61b53/f017a101.mp3" length="6659866" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlXbHAUqVhs">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>454</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume that if they are only raising capital from accredited investors they already know, a simple LLC operating agreement is enough. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why skipping the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) can create unnecessary exposure.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume that if they are only raising capital from accredited investors they already know, a simple LLC operating agreement is enough. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why skipping the Private Placement Memor</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1b61b53/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1b61b53/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Real Estate Syndication Waterfalls: Priority, Not Guarantees</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Real Estate Syndication Waterfalls: Priority, Not Guarantees</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">546c99cd-5d71-454d-a88e-c834e25a0152</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5d1f0964</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, we look at how distribution waterfalls actually work in a real estate syndication. Sponsors often want to pitch the preferred return as guaranteed passive income to make the capital raise easier. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why this assumption is legally problematic and how it can create misrepresentation issues. You will learn the anatomy of a clean three-tier waterfall, the critical difference between a preferred return and return of capital, and why overly complex IRR hurdles often create unnecessary administrative burdens for your accountant and your investors.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Waterfalls — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-waterfalls/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-waterfalls/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/PDHahINB3yk">https://youtu.be/PDHahINB3yk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, we look at how distribution waterfalls actually work in a real estate syndication. Sponsors often want to pitch the preferred return as guaranteed passive income to make the capital raise easier. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why this assumption is legally problematic and how it can create misrepresentation issues. You will learn the anatomy of a clean three-tier waterfall, the critical difference between a preferred return and return of capital, and why overly complex IRR hurdles often create unnecessary administrative burdens for your accountant and your investors.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Waterfalls — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-waterfalls/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-waterfalls/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/PDHahINB3yk">https://youtu.be/PDHahINB3yk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:38:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5d1f0964/173bb6e3.mp3" length="6006365" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDHahINB3yk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>408</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti explains how distribution waterfalls actually work in a real estate syndication, detailing why preferred returns are a priority of payment, not a guaranteed yield.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti explains how distribution waterfalls actually work in a real estate syndication, detailing why preferred returns are a priority of payment, not a guaranteed yield.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5d1f0964/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5d1f0964/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulation D Offerings: The Disclosure Record Reality</title>
      <itunes:title>Regulation D Offerings: The Disclosure Record Reality</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3eb28f65-6df9-4b3b-bd5b-e55097ec4675</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fdfb6218</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that if they are only raising from accredited investors in a Regulation D offering, they can save time by skipping the disclosure documents and just using a pitch deck. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the reality of the disclosure record. He breaks down the difference between marketing materials and legal documents, highlighting why relying on a slide deck to do a Private Placement Memorandum's job can create significant risks under SEC anti-fraud rules. You will learn the plain-English differences between Rule 506(b) and 506(c), and why documenting the downside of a deal is just as important as pitching the upside.<p>Also see: Regulation D Offerings - Raising Capital With Private Placements — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-offerings/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-offerings/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bOwFFNrF7Zo">https://youtu.be/bOwFFNrF7Zo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that if they are only raising from accredited investors in a Regulation D offering, they can save time by skipping the disclosure documents and just using a pitch deck. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the reality of the disclosure record. He breaks down the difference between marketing materials and legal documents, highlighting why relying on a slide deck to do a Private Placement Memorandum's job can create significant risks under SEC anti-fraud rules. You will learn the plain-English differences between Rule 506(b) and 506(c), and why documenting the downside of a deal is just as important as pitching the upside.<p>Also see: Regulation D Offerings - Raising Capital With Private Placements — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-offerings/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-offerings/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/bOwFFNrF7Zo">https://youtu.be/bOwFFNrF7Zo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:20:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fdfb6218/6a71ba35.mp3" length="6365302" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOwFFNrF7Zo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>433</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti breaks down the dangerous assumption sponsors make about skipping the Private Placement Memorandum when raising capital solely from accredited investors.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti breaks down the dangerous assumption sponsors make about skipping the Private Placement Memorandum when raising capital solely from accredited investors.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fdfb6218/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fdfb6218/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Danger of Investor Hype in Multifamily Offerings</title>
      <itunes:title>The Danger of Investor Hype in Multifamily Offerings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84cf57b6-ae56-494f-a279-25fad20d3f7f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/781f53b4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is a common assumption among real estate sponsors that capital raising requires promising 'guaranteed passive income' and effortless returns. But what happens when the building's operational reality clashes with the pitch deck? In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how marketing hype can create disclosure problems and restrict your flexibility when unexpected expenses arise. Learn why proper discretion in the Operating Agreement and honest risk disclosure in the Private Placement Memorandum provide better protection for the sponsor and appeal more to serious investors.<p>Also see: Multifamily Syndication for Real Estate Syndicators — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/multifamily-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/multifamily-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Xr6FXlujpNo">https://youtu.be/Xr6FXlujpNo</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It is a common assumption among real estate sponsors that capital raising requires promising 'guaranteed passive income' and effortless returns. But what happens when the building's operational reality clashes with the pitch deck? In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how marketing hype can create disclosure problems and restrict your flexibility when unexpected expenses arise. Learn why proper discretion in the Operating Agreement and honest risk disclosure in the Private Placement Memorandum provide better protection for the sponsor and appeal more to serious investors.<p>Also see: Multifamily Syndication for Real Estate Syndicators — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/multifamily-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/multifamily-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Xr6FXlujpNo">https://youtu.be/Xr6FXlujpNo</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 23:59:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/781f53b4/a549a68e.mp3" length="5352535" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr6FXlujpNo">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>361</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume they need to promise guaranteed, effortless returns to attract capital. In reality, marketing hype can backfire, restricting operational flexibility and creating unnecessary liabilities.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume they need to promise guaranteed, effortless returns to attract capital. In reality, marketing hype can backfire, restricting operational flexibility and creating unnecessary liabilities.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/781f53b4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/781f53b4/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Trap of Pitching Passive Income</title>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Trap of Pitching Passive Income</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8bfc268-4e9e-4fc3-8c23-f6898a2b7b3e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/944c8357</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pitching passive income in a Regulation D syndication might sound like an easy way to attract capital, but using words like "guaranteed" or "risk-free" can create serious securities liabilities. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how anti-fraud rules apply to everyone, even in exempt offerings like 506(b) and 506(c). You will learn why sophisticated investors view hype as a red flag, how to navigate unexpected capital expenditures without facing investor claims, and the importance of aligning your pitch deck with your Private Placement Memorandum. Discover how to sell the true value of your syndication structure without crossing the line into misleading promises.<p>Also see: Why invest in real estate syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/why-invest-in-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/why-invest-in-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/GDYF9WVz_wM">https://youtu.be/GDYF9WVz_wM</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Pitching passive income in a Regulation D syndication might sound like an easy way to attract capital, but using words like "guaranteed" or "risk-free" can create serious securities liabilities. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how anti-fraud rules apply to everyone, even in exempt offerings like 506(b) and 506(c). You will learn why sophisticated investors view hype as a red flag, how to navigate unexpected capital expenditures without facing investor claims, and the importance of aligning your pitch deck with your Private Placement Memorandum. Discover how to sell the true value of your syndication structure without crossing the line into misleading promises.<p>Also see: Why invest in real estate syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/why-invest-in-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/why-invest-in-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/GDYF9WVz_wM">https://youtu.be/GDYF9WVz_wM</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 23:40:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/944c8357/efbd2ba0.mp3" length="5576733" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDYF9WVz_wM">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>377</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pitching passive income and guaranteed returns in a Regulation D syndication might sound like good marketing, but it can create unexpected securities liabilities. Tilden Moschetti explains why hype backfires and how to frame your value proposition correctly.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pitching passive income and guaranteed returns in a Regulation D syndication might sound like good marketing, but it can create unexpected securities liabilities. Tilden Moschetti explains why hype backfires and how to frame your value proposition correct</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/944c8357/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/944c8357/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Disclosure Record When Raising Syndication Capital</title>
      <itunes:title>The Disclosure Record When Raising Syndication Capital</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17cde390-429e-4375-92ae-4de8a052ec02</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/75be775a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Raising capital from accredited investors in a Regulation D syndication often leads sponsors to a dangerous assumption: because the investors are wealthy and friendly, a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is an unnecessary expense. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores the tension between what securities laws technically allow and what is actually smart for your operation. 

We cover why anti-fraud rules effectively mandate full disclosure regardless of investor status, the difference between a pitch deck and a formal disclosure record, and how a properly drafted PPM acts as an operational shield rather than administrative friction.<p>Also see: Raising Money for Real Estate Syndication — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-money-for-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-money-for-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/e0GrJCW5iY8">https://youtu.be/e0GrJCW5iY8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Raising capital from accredited investors in a Regulation D syndication often leads sponsors to a dangerous assumption: because the investors are wealthy and friendly, a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is an unnecessary expense. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores the tension between what securities laws technically allow and what is actually smart for your operation. 

We cover why anti-fraud rules effectively mandate full disclosure regardless of investor status, the difference between a pitch deck and a formal disclosure record, and how a properly drafted PPM acts as an operational shield rather than administrative friction.<p>Also see: Raising Money for Real Estate Syndication — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-money-for-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/raising-money-for-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/e0GrJCW5iY8">https://youtu.be/e0GrJCW5iY8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 23:19:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/75be775a/c9f1eea9.mp3" length="5712044" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0GrJCW5iY8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>387</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume they don't need a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) if all their investors are accredited and friendly. Tilden explores why skipping the PPM can create unnecessary exposure and how a proper disclosure record acts as your operational shield.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume they don't need a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) if all their investors are accredited and friendly. Tilden explores why skipping the PPM can create unnecessary exposure and how a proper disclosure record acts as your operational</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/75be775a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/75be775a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Definition of a Real Estate Syndication</title>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Definition of a Real Estate Syndication</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e46fb4ec-c231-4bf8-9cc9-a1288ba9b6b4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6f0316fe</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Many sponsors assume that pooling money with a few friends for a small property is just a casual partnership, bypassing complex securities laws. But the legal definition of a syndication isn't based on the size of the deal or the number of investors—it is entirely about control. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the plain-English difference between an active joint venture and a passive real estate syndication. Learn why relying on a basic LLC operating agreement can expose you to liability when a deal underperforms, the practical test for knowing if you are actually selling a security, and the specific disclosure documents you need to protect yourself and your investors before taking a single check.<p>Also see: What Is Real Estate Syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI">https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many sponsors assume that pooling money with a few friends for a small property is just a casual partnership, bypassing complex securities laws. But the legal definition of a syndication isn't based on the size of the deal or the number of investors—it is entirely about control. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the plain-English difference between an active joint venture and a passive real estate syndication. Learn why relying on a basic LLC operating agreement can expose you to liability when a deal underperforms, the practical test for knowing if you are actually selling a security, and the specific disclosure documents you need to protect yourself and your investors before taking a single check.<p>Also see: What Is Real Estate Syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI">https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:25:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6f0316fe/3e633cf8.mp3" length="5285377" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJYnbY55IAI">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>356</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume that pooling money with a few friends for a small property is just a casual partnership. In reality, the legal definition of a syndication comes down to control, not the size of the deal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume that pooling money with a few friends for a small property is just a casual partnership. In reality, the legal definition of a syndication comes down to control, not the size of the deal.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6f0316fe/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6f0316fe/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 'Just a PPM' Assumption in Syndication</title>
      <itunes:title>The 'Just a PPM' Assumption in Syndication</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">067d34c2-fa9f-4bfd-8749-02f914bd8d65</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e8a588a1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume they only need a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to legally raise capital. But the PPM is simply a disclosure document—it describes the deal, but it does not govern the flow of money. In this episode, we explore the core tension between what a PPM describes and what an Operating Agreement actually enforces. If you've ever wondered why you need a syndication attorney instead of just an online template, this whiteboard breakdown highlights why your disclosure, governing agreements, investor intake, and securities filings must align flawlessly to protect investor trust.<p>Also see: Do I Need a PPM Attorney? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-attorney/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-attorney/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI">https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume they only need a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) to legally raise capital. But the PPM is simply a disclosure document—it describes the deal, but it does not govern the flow of money. In this episode, we explore the core tension between what a PPM describes and what an Operating Agreement actually enforces. If you've ever wondered why you need a syndication attorney instead of just an online template, this whiteboard breakdown highlights why your disclosure, governing agreements, investor intake, and securities filings must align flawlessly to protect investor trust.<p>Also see: Do I Need a PPM Attorney? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-attorney/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-attorney/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI">https://youtu.be/fJYnbY55IAI</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:07:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e8a588a1/a0ca3bc2.mp3" length="5455417" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJYnbY55IAI">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>368</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume that completing a Private Placement Memorandum is all they need to launch a syndication. Tilden Moschetti explains the critical difference between disclosure and governance, and why ignoring your operating agreement can create unintended legal complications.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume that completing a Private Placement Memorandum is all they need to launch a syndication. Tilden Moschetti explains the critical difference between disclosure and governance, and why ignoring your operating agreement can create uninte</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e8a588a1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e8a588a1/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Asset Management Approach to Tenant Vacancies</title>
      <itunes:title>The Asset Management Approach to Tenant Vacancies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f3167a33-b675-427e-8c6e-c1b15e184d62</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5bb5b872</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Evaluating prospective tenants in a syndicated property often creates a quiet collision between short-term cash flow and long-term valuation. Sponsors frequently assume any paying tenant is better than an empty unit. However, locking in below-market rents or heavy tenant improvements can negatively impact the Net Operating Income (NOI) when it is time to sell. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti discusses the asset management approach to tenant vacancies. You will learn the critical difference between the property manager's goal of occupancy and the sponsor's goal of valuation, plus a three-question framework for ensuring new leases align with your exit strategy.<p>Also see: Filling your vacancy: Is this tenant right for your syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/filling-syndication-tenant-vacancy/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/filling-syndication-tenant-vacancy/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA">https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Evaluating prospective tenants in a syndicated property often creates a quiet collision between short-term cash flow and long-term valuation. Sponsors frequently assume any paying tenant is better than an empty unit. However, locking in below-market rents or heavy tenant improvements can negatively impact the Net Operating Income (NOI) when it is time to sell. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti discusses the asset management approach to tenant vacancies. You will learn the critical difference between the property manager's goal of occupancy and the sponsor's goal of valuation, plus a three-question framework for ensuring new leases align with your exit strategy.<p>Also see: Filling your vacancy: Is this tenant right for your syndication? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/filling-syndication-tenant-vacancy/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/filling-syndication-tenant-vacancy/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA">https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:33:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5bb5b872/ff5ca3ec.mp3" length="5533963" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0djt-9w5hlA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>374</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, we explore why sponsors must evaluate tenant vacancies through the lens of asset management, not just property management, to protect their final valuation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, we explore why sponsors must evaluate tenant vacancies through the lens of asset management, not just property management, to protect their final valuation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5bb5b872/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5bb5b872/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Actual Job of a Private Placement Memorandum</title>
      <itunes:title>The Actual Job of a Private Placement Memorandum</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0a256ca-b605-4602-92dc-60debf35710e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/adab0b9e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the role of a Private Placement Memorandum in a Regulation D syndication can clarify your disclosure obligations and help protect your offering. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the exact job of a PPM. Many sponsors assume that an all-accredited investor base means they can skip formal disclosures and just rely on a pitch deck and an operating agreement. We explore the core tension of this assumption: why pitch decks are too optimistic to serve as disclosures, why operating agreements are too mechanical, and how the PPM fills the crucial gap by documenting the risks. Discover how the PPM fits into your full legal package to keep you protected under anti-fraud rules.<p>Also see: What is the purpose of Private Placement Memorandum (PPM)? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/do-i-need-a-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/do-i-need-a-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/22OW0Axyo0E">https://youtu.be/22OW0Axyo0E</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the role of a Private Placement Memorandum in a Regulation D syndication can clarify your disclosure obligations and help protect your offering. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the exact job of a PPM. Many sponsors assume that an all-accredited investor base means they can skip formal disclosures and just rely on a pitch deck and an operating agreement. We explore the core tension of this assumption: why pitch decks are too optimistic to serve as disclosures, why operating agreements are too mechanical, and how the PPM fills the crucial gap by documenting the risks. Discover how the PPM fits into your full legal package to keep you protected under anti-fraud rules.<p>Also see: What is the purpose of Private Placement Memorandum (PPM)? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/do-i-need-a-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/do-i-need-a-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/22OW0Axyo0E">https://youtu.be/22OW0Axyo0E</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:14:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/adab0b9e/a7de7271.mp3" length="6024837" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22OW0Axyo0E">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>409</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Understanding the true role of a Private Placement Memorandum in a Regulation D syndication. We explore why skipping the PPM, even with an all-accredited investor base, leaves sponsors exposed, and how it bridges the disclosure gap between your pitch deck and operating agreement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Understanding the true role of a Private Placement Memorandum in a Regulation D syndication. We explore why skipping the PPM, even with an all-accredited investor base, leaves sponsors exposed, and how it bridges the disclosure gap between your pitch deck</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/adab0b9e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/adab0b9e/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Asset Manager's Trap: Delegating Property Management</title>
      <itunes:title>The Asset Manager's Trap: Delegating Property Management</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7748b3d2-96fa-419a-bde6-1c9ad7280c12</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c25d5215</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When syndicators hire a third-party property management company, it is easy to assume the operational work is complete. However, delegating the day-to-day maintenance of a property does not relieve a sponsor of their fiduciary duty to oversee the investment itself. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the critical distinction between property management and asset management. We explore a common scenario where stepping back too far can create unexpected operational failures, and outline four practical strategies—from setting early KPIs to holding weekly check-ins—to ensure your business plan stays on track.<p>Also see: Syndicators Managing Property Managers - 4 Insider Tips — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndicators-managing-property-managers/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndicators-managing-property-managers/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA">https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When syndicators hire a third-party property management company, it is easy to assume the operational work is complete. However, delegating the day-to-day maintenance of a property does not relieve a sponsor of their fiduciary duty to oversee the investment itself. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the critical distinction between property management and asset management. We explore a common scenario where stepping back too far can create unexpected operational failures, and outline four practical strategies—from setting early KPIs to holding weekly check-ins—to ensure your business plan stays on track.<p>Also see: Syndicators Managing Property Managers - 4 Insider Tips — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndicators-managing-property-managers/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndicators-managing-property-managers/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA">https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:37:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c25d5215/4f451935.mp3" length="5843426" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0djt-9w5hlA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>396</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hiring a third-party property manager doesn't mean your operational work is over—it just means your job changes. In this field note, we explore why a syndicator's duty to manage the asset and execute the business plan cannot be delegated.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hiring a third-party property manager doesn't mean your operational work is over—it just means your job changes. In this field note, we explore why a syndicator's duty to manage the asset and execute the business plan cannot be delegated.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c25d5215/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c25d5215/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulation D: Why We Don't Register Deals with the SEC</title>
      <itunes:title>Regulation D: Why We Don't Register Deals with the SEC</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f7bef86-4af6-4554-b2c1-7e1ddd1f8247</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bed6e278</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When putting together a private equity fund or real estate deal, sponsors sometimes mistakenly believe that full SEC registration is the default and Regulation D is a legal loophole. In this field note, we break down the general rule of securities registration and the stark reality of why it kills most private deals before they begin. We cover the cost and time differences between going public and utilizing Regulation D, and highlight the clean tradeoff between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). You'll learn why choosing your exemption is just the first step, and why aligning your private offering package with that choice is what establishes a clean, professional framework for your investors.<p>Also see: Regulation D - The King of Securities Exceptions — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA">https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When putting together a private equity fund or real estate deal, sponsors sometimes mistakenly believe that full SEC registration is the default and Regulation D is a legal loophole. In this field note, we break down the general rule of securities registration and the stark reality of why it kills most private deals before they begin. We cover the cost and time differences between going public and utilizing Regulation D, and highlight the clean tradeoff between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). You'll learn why choosing your exemption is just the first step, and why aligning your private offering package with that choice is what establishes a clean, professional framework for your investors.<p>Also see: Regulation D - The King of Securities Exceptions — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA">https://youtu.be/0djt-9w5hlA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:31:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bed6e278/0c5c2bee.mp3" length="6508022" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0djt-9w5hlA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>443</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume Regulation D is a sketchy loophole. In this field note, we unpack why full SEC registration is practically impossible for most private deals and why Reg D is the gold-standard front door for raising capital.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume Regulation D is a sketchy loophole. In this field note, we unpack why full SEC registration is practically impossible for most private deals and why Reg D is the gold-standard front door for raising capital.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bed6e278/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bed6e278/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Line Between a Joint Venture and a Syndication</title>
      <itunes:title>The Line Between a Joint Venture and a Syndication</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7cf2c5b1-0f4b-4487-8642-72dfeec9dcac</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6550a8c9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that pooling a dozen investors into an apartment building is just a matter of forming an LLC and handing out ownership percentages. But when your investors are entirely passive, you aren't just forming a partnership—you are selling a security. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the critical differences between a casual joint venture and a Regulation D syndication. He breaks down the three essential documents you need (the Operating Agreement, the PPM, and the Subscription Agreement) and explains why this legal package isn't regulatory red tape, but rather the exact mechanism that keeps you in the driver's seat.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication: Raising Investment Capital For Properties — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/R-iUBZU_uc8">https://youtu.be/R-iUBZU_uc8</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume that pooling a dozen investors into an apartment building is just a matter of forming an LLC and handing out ownership percentages. But when your investors are entirely passive, you aren't just forming a partnership—you are selling a security. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the critical differences between a casual joint venture and a Regulation D syndication. He breaks down the three essential documents you need (the Operating Agreement, the PPM, and the Subscription Agreement) and explains why this legal package isn't regulatory red tape, but rather the exact mechanism that keeps you in the driver's seat.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication: Raising Investment Capital For Properties — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/R-iUBZU_uc8">https://youtu.be/R-iUBZU_uc8</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:14:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6550a8c9/d3ea4938.mp3" length="4754121" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-iUBZU_uc8">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>318</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti breaks down the common assumption sponsors make when pooling passive investor capital, explaining why syndications are securities offerings, not just simple LLC partnerships.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti breaks down the common assumption sponsors make when pooling passive investor capital, explaining why syndications are securities offerings, not just simple LLC partnerships.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6550a8c9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6550a8c9/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring Deadlock and Exit Provisions for Co-Sponsors</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring Deadlock and Exit Provisions for Co-Sponsors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f991776f-35f8-4e86-9fa8-076e3b5cdc3a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e3cb39c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When two co-sponsors agree on a business plan, they often assume they will agree on every major decision years down the road. But when market conditions change, a clean 50-50 voting split can quickly create deal paralysis. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down what happens when managers deadlock on major decisions like selling an asset or calling capital. We explore practical, emotionless mechanisms you can build into your operating agreement—such as third-party tie-breakers and the shotgun buy-sell—to ensure your asset doesn't stall when it most needs direction. Trust is essential, but trust is not a mechanism.<p>Also see: Don’t Be Held Hostage in Syndication Negotiations — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/dont-be-held-hostage-in-negotiations/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/dont-be-held-hostage-in-negotiations/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/iX0uO3bStvs">https://youtu.be/iX0uO3bStvs</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When two co-sponsors agree on a business plan, they often assume they will agree on every major decision years down the road. But when market conditions change, a clean 50-50 voting split can quickly create deal paralysis. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down what happens when managers deadlock on major decisions like selling an asset or calling capital. We explore practical, emotionless mechanisms you can build into your operating agreement—such as third-party tie-breakers and the shotgun buy-sell—to ensure your asset doesn't stall when it most needs direction. Trust is essential, but trust is not a mechanism.<p>Also see: Don’t Be Held Hostage in Syndication Negotiations — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/dont-be-held-hostage-in-negotiations/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/dont-be-held-hostage-in-negotiations/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/iX0uO3bStvs">https://youtu.be/iX0uO3bStvs</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:01:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1e3cb39c/56442432.mp3" length="5390195" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX0uO3bStvs">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>364</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tilden Moschetti explains why a 50-50 voting split can paralyze a deal and how to structure deadlock provisions in your operating agreement before market changes turn alignment into a stalemate.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tilden Moschetti explains why a 50-50 voting split can paralyze a deal and how to structure deadlock provisions in your operating agreement before market changes turn alignment into a stalemate.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e3cb39c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1e3cb39c/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring the Issuer and Manager LLCs</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring the Issuer and Manager LLCs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9de86526-2b3a-40cd-937e-77556e9467c1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/887cdcf4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring the Issuer and Manager LLCs in a syndication requires more than just filing paperwork. Sponsors often assume an LLC provides a magic liability shield and that generic operating agreements are enough to run a deal. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the standard two-entity model—separating the investors' capital in the Issuer from your control in the Manager. You'll learn why asset protection depends on how you run your books, why an off-the-shelf operating agreement won't work for complex economics like distribution waterfalls, and why your Operating Agreement must match your PPM word for word.<p>Also see: How to Form a Real Estate Syndication LLC or Corporation — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/vGp-hNdyoGQ">https://youtu.be/vGp-hNdyoGQ</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring the Issuer and Manager LLCs in a syndication requires more than just filing paperwork. Sponsors often assume an LLC provides a magic liability shield and that generic operating agreements are enough to run a deal. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the standard two-entity model—separating the investors' capital in the Issuer from your control in the Manager. You'll learn why asset protection depends on how you run your books, why an off-the-shelf operating agreement won't work for complex economics like distribution waterfalls, and why your Operating Agreement must match your PPM word for word.<p>Also see: How to Form a Real Estate Syndication LLC or Corporation — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/vGp-hNdyoGQ">https://youtu.be/vGp-hNdyoGQ</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:37:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/887cdcf4/e9f6a782.mp3" length="5767395" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGp-hNdyoGQ">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>390</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume filing an LLC provides an instant liability shield and that a generic operating agreement will suffice. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the two-entity syndication model and explains why your operating agreement is the actual engine of your deal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume filing an LLC provides an instant liability shield and that a generic operating agreement will suffice. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the two-entity syndication model and explains why your oper</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/887cdcf4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/887cdcf4/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Voting Rights Trap in Syndication Operating Agreements</title>
      <itunes:title>The Voting Rights Trap in Syndication Operating Agreements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdaf51cf-d0e7-4aff-a132-0efb425c45e8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cab4503</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often pour their energy into the Private Placement Memorandum while relying on generic LLC templates for their Operating Agreement. But as syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains, this common practice can accidentally hand operational control to passive investors. In this episode, we cover why the Operating Agreement is the actual rulebook, the dangers of joint-venture templates in a syndication, and how to ensure your legal documents work together to keep you in control of your asset. This podcast is for public education and does not constitute legal advice.<p>Also see: Operating Agreements Provisions for Rental Property Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-operating-agreement-provisions/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-operating-agreement-provisions/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/DO1juf-rWXA">https://youtu.be/DO1juf-rWXA</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often pour their energy into the Private Placement Memorandum while relying on generic LLC templates for their Operating Agreement. But as syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains, this common practice can accidentally hand operational control to passive investors. In this episode, we cover why the Operating Agreement is the actual rulebook, the dangers of joint-venture templates in a syndication, and how to ensure your legal documents work together to keep you in control of your asset. This podcast is for public education and does not constitute legal advice.<p>Also see: Operating Agreements Provisions for Rental Property Syndications — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-operating-agreement-provisions/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-operating-agreement-provisions/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/DO1juf-rWXA">https://youtu.be/DO1juf-rWXA</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:24:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0cab4503/edce8421.mp3" length="5839049" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO1juf-rWXA">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>395</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often spend all their energy on the Private Placement Memorandum while using generic LLC templates for their Operating Agreement. Tilden Moschetti explains why this approach can accidentally hand operational control to passive investors and how to align your rulebook with your disclosures.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often spend all their energy on the Private Placement Memorandum while using generic LLC templates for their Operating Agreement. Tilden Moschetti explains why this approach can accidentally hand operational control to passive investors and how t</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cab4503/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cab4503/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drafting for Investor Panic: Behavioral Finance in Reg D</title>
      <itunes:title>Drafting for Investor Panic: Behavioral Finance in Reg D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f8dd697b-d9da-4f28-8286-fbc81913f266</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/041eae6d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring manager authority in a Regulation D fund requires acknowledging a fundamental truth: accredited investors do not always act rationally. When distributions pause, loss aversion and herd mentality can quickly escalate into operational risks. In this episode, we explore how to draft your Operating Agreement and Private Placement Memorandum for the worst day of your fund's life. We discuss the importance of limiting operational voting rights, why promising easy redemptions can backfire, and how keeping manager authority tight ultimately protects your investors from themselves.<p>Also see: Behavioral Finance for Regulation D Syndicators and Fund Managers — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/behavioral-finance-for-regulation-d-syndicators-and-fund-managers/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/behavioral-finance-for-regulation-d-syndicators-and-fund-managers/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0Fn3msfFj_M">https://youtu.be/0Fn3msfFj_M</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring manager authority in a Regulation D fund requires acknowledging a fundamental truth: accredited investors do not always act rationally. When distributions pause, loss aversion and herd mentality can quickly escalate into operational risks. In this episode, we explore how to draft your Operating Agreement and Private Placement Memorandum for the worst day of your fund's life. We discuss the importance of limiting operational voting rights, why promising easy redemptions can backfire, and how keeping manager authority tight ultimately protects your investors from themselves.<p>Also see: Behavioral Finance for Regulation D Syndicators and Fund Managers — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/behavioral-finance-for-regulation-d-syndicators-and-fund-managers/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/behavioral-finance-for-regulation-d-syndicators-and-fund-managers/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/0Fn3msfFj_M">https://youtu.be/0Fn3msfFj_M</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:11:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/041eae6d/d378ecd5.mp3" length="4995395" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fn3msfFj_M">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>335</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Structuring manager authority in a Regulation D fund requires acknowledging a fundamental truth: accredited investors do not always act rationally. In this note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how to structure your offering documents to survive investor panic.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Structuring manager authority in a Regulation D fund requires acknowledging a fundamental truth: accredited investors do not always act rationally. In this note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how to structure your offering documents to su</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/041eae6d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/041eae6d/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Unregistered Capital Raiser Trap in Reg D Offerings</title>
      <itunes:title>The Unregistered Capital Raiser Trap in Reg D Offerings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a08b5b2-3e37-44bf-ab02-3b72206c116c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/41c30a39</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create unexpected legal exposure. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the common trap of paying an unlicensed friend or peer a percentage of the capital they bring into a deal. This episode covers the SEC's strict view on transaction-based compensation, the real-world consequence of investor rescission rights, and the compliant ways principals can raise capital for their own offerings without needing to hire a broker-dealer.<p>Also see: How To Raise Capital From Investors For A Regulation D Offering Without Using Broker-Dealers — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-raise-capital-from-investors-for-a-regulation-d-offering-without-using-broker-dealers/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-raise-capital-from-investors-for-a-regulation-d-offering-without-using-broker-dealers/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Fg7aRiOBve4">https://youtu.be/Fg7aRiOBve4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create unexpected legal exposure. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the common trap of paying an unlicensed friend or peer a percentage of the capital they bring into a deal. This episode covers the SEC's strict view on transaction-based compensation, the real-world consequence of investor rescission rights, and the compliant ways principals can raise capital for their own offerings without needing to hire a broker-dealer.<p>Also see: How To Raise Capital From Investors For A Regulation D Offering Without Using Broker-Dealers — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-raise-capital-from-investors-for-a-regulation-d-offering-without-using-broker-dealers/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/how-to-raise-capital-from-investors-for-a-regulation-d-offering-without-using-broker-dealers/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/Fg7aRiOBve4">https://youtu.be/Fg7aRiOBve4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 18:50:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/41c30a39/92ab968e.mp3" length="5952330" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg7aRiOBve4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create significant legal exposure. Tilden Moschetti explains the trap of transaction-based compensation and how to keep your capital raise compliant.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D syndication can create significant legal exposure. Tilden Moschetti explains the trap of transaction-based compensation and how to keep your capital raise compliant.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/41c30a39/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/41c30a39/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rule 506(b): The Disclosure Reality of a Quiet Raise</title>
      <itunes:title>Rule 506(b): The Disclosure Reality of a Quiet Raise</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10621df9-9b6f-44d6-868f-d3ca08aa34d9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a569ddd8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the disclosure requirements and general solicitation limits of a Rule 506(b) quiet raise. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a core tension: sponsors assuming that raising money from their network means they don't need a Private Placement Memorandum. We explore what constitutes a pre-existing substantive relationship, how easy it is to accidentally trigger general solicitation, and why your documentation needs to be loud even when your advertising is quiet.<p>Also see: Rule 506(b) Guide: How to Run a Compliant, Quiet Raise — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506b-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506b-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34">https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Understanding the disclosure requirements and general solicitation limits of a Rule 506(b) quiet raise. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a core tension: sponsors assuming that raising money from their network means they don't need a Private Placement Memorandum. We explore what constitutes a pre-existing substantive relationship, how easy it is to accidentally trigger general solicitation, and why your documentation needs to be loud even when your advertising is quiet.<p>Also see: Rule 506(b) Guide: How to Run a Compliant, Quiet Raise — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506b-of-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/rule-506b-of-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34">https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:58:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a569ddd8/fff7f236.mp3" length="6652154" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZgR_LiV-34">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>454</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume a 'quiet' Rule 506(b) raise among their network means skipping the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the reality of general solicitation limits and why your documentation needs to be loud even when your marketing is quiet.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume a 'quiet' Rule 506(b) raise among their network means skipping the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the reality of general solicitation limits and why your documentation needs to b</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a569ddd8/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a569ddd8/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Regulation D Disclosure Record</title>
      <itunes:title>The Regulation D Disclosure Record</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c604f34e-cc1d-4a23-b1f1-8f6d7ec9dbd2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/06067e64</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often read that if all their investors are accredited, the SEC doesn't strictly require a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). But confusing an exemption from registration with an exemption from anti-fraud rules can create unnecessary liabilities. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the true purpose of the PPM in a Regulation D offering. Through a practical whiteboard example of a debt fund, learn why relying on just a pitch deck and a subscription agreement leaves you exposed, and how the PPM acts as your crucial disclosure record when deals face unexpected challenges.<p>Also see: Reg D Securities Laws and Syndication — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-securities-laws-and-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-securities-laws-and-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34">https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often read that if all their investors are accredited, the SEC doesn't strictly require a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). But confusing an exemption from registration with an exemption from anti-fraud rules can create unnecessary liabilities. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the true purpose of the PPM in a Regulation D offering. Through a practical whiteboard example of a debt fund, learn why relying on just a pitch deck and a subscription agreement leaves you exposed, and how the PPM acts as your crucial disclosure record when deals face unexpected challenges.<p>Also see: Reg D Securities Laws and Syndication — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-securities-laws-and-regulation-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndication-securities-laws-and-regulation-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34">https://youtu.be/KZgR_LiV-34</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:48:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/06067e64/ed65b49c.mp3" length="5175372" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZgR_LiV-34">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>348</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) isn't necessary when raising funds solely from accredited investors. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why skipping the PPM exposes sponsors to anti-fraud risks under Regulation D.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) isn't necessary when raising funds solely from accredited investors. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why skipping the PPM exposes sponsors to anti-fraud risks un</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/06067e64/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/06067e64/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single-Asset Syndications vs. Blind-Pool Funds</title>
      <itunes:title>Single-Asset Syndications vs. Blind-Pool Funds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa53cc39-8ed8-41ed-9131-9beb2bb99767</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7a4ff7c5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Are you deciding between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool fund for your next raise? Many sponsors assume a fund is the natural next step for prestige and speed. But as syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains, this is rarely just a legal question—it is fundamentally a question of investor trust. If you don't have the track record to sell a mandate, an expensive blind-pool fund might just sit empty on a shelf. In this episode, Tilden breaks down a $25 million hypothetical to show why investors often prefer seeing a specific building over handing over a blank check, and how to ensure your legal structure reflects your actual raising ability.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Fund Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fund-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fund-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/sSb4B43OV-4">https://youtu.be/sSb4B43OV-4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Are you deciding between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool fund for your next raise? Many sponsors assume a fund is the natural next step for prestige and speed. But as syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains, this is rarely just a legal question—it is fundamentally a question of investor trust. If you don't have the track record to sell a mandate, an expensive blind-pool fund might just sit empty on a shelf. In this episode, Tilden breaks down a $25 million hypothetical to show why investors often prefer seeing a specific building over handing over a blank check, and how to ensure your legal structure reflects your actual raising ability.<p>Also see: Real Estate Syndication Fund Structures — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fund-structures/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-syndication-fund-structures/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/sSb4B43OV-4">https://youtu.be/sSb4B43OV-4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:40:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7a4ff7c5/a13b611b.mp3" length="5050491" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSb4B43OV-4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>339</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often want to jump straight into a blind-pool fund for prestige and speed, but is it the right move? Tilden Moschetti explains why choosing between a fund and a single-asset syndication is less about legal mechanics and more about what you can actually sell to investors.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often want to jump straight into a blind-pool fund for prestige and speed, but is it the right move? Tilden Moschetti explains why choosing between a fund and a single-asset syndication is less about legal mechanics and more about what you can ac</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7a4ff7c5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7a4ff7c5/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of the PPM in Your Legal Package</title>
      <itunes:title>The Role of the PPM in Your Legal Package</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f22781e-8e60-4331-94ed-95bed7ee8050</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1f085836</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often mistake the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for a marketing brochure or a duplicate of the Operating Agreement. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the specific roles of the three main documents in your syndication legal package. You'll learn why the Operating Agreement and Subscription Agreement aren't built for risk disclosure, and how a properly drafted PPM serves as your definitive record of truth. Through a practical Regulation D hypothetical, we explore the protective value of putting all risks on paper before the investor signs.<p>Also see: What Is a PPM (Private Placement Memorandum)? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/M85UbaH6ppk">https://youtu.be/M85UbaH6ppk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often mistake the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for a marketing brochure or a duplicate of the Operating Agreement. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, Tilden Moschetti breaks down the specific roles of the three main documents in your syndication legal package. You'll learn why the Operating Agreement and Subscription Agreement aren't built for risk disclosure, and how a properly drafted PPM serves as your definitive record of truth. Through a practical Regulation D hypothetical, we explore the protective value of putting all risks on paper before the investor signs.<p>Also see: What Is a PPM (Private Placement Memorandum)? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-ppm/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/what-is-a-ppm/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/M85UbaH6ppk">https://youtu.be/M85UbaH6ppk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:21:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1f085836/5af9e31a.mp3" length="5306826" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M85UbaH6ppk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>358</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often mistake the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for a marketing brochure or a duplicate of the Operating Agreement. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the actual role of the PPM as the ultimate disclosure record in your legal package.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often mistake the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for a marketing brochure or a duplicate of the Operating Agreement. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the actual role of the PPM as the ultimate disclosure r</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1f085836/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1f085836/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Regulation D Legal Package</title>
      <itunes:title>The Regulation D Legal Package</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0bfdaf48-6c15-40d6-8b60-5564db41b533</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/60ad0f0e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Regulation D is the SEC's safe harbor exemption that allows you to raise private capital without the immense expense required for public registration. Still, many sponsors mistake Reg D for regulatory red tape. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the SEC's default rule, the risk of bypassing a formal legal package for a quick term sheet, and how to build a compliant structure. You'll learn how to choose between the 506(b) and 506(c) exemptions, and why the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement form the essential foundation of your private offering.<p>Also see: The SEC And Its Reg D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/BMiyuBhIobU">https://youtu.be/BMiyuBhIobU</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Regulation D is the SEC's safe harbor exemption that allows you to raise private capital without the immense expense required for public registration. Still, many sponsors mistake Reg D for regulatory red tape. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the SEC's default rule, the risk of bypassing a formal legal package for a quick term sheet, and how to build a compliant structure. You'll learn how to choose between the 506(b) and 506(c) exemptions, and why the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement form the essential foundation of your private offering.<p>Also see: The SEC And Its Reg D — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-reg-d/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-reg-d/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/BMiyuBhIobU">https://youtu.be/BMiyuBhIobU</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:08:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/60ad0f0e/7efca0ce.mp3" length="6297039" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMiyuBhIobU">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>428</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume Regulation D compliance is just red tape slowing down a private capital raise. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why Reg D is actually a safe harbor, how the SEC views unregistered offerings, and what core documents are required to properly structure your exemption.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume Regulation D compliance is just red tape slowing down a private capital raise. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why Reg D is actually a safe harbor, how the SEC views unregistered offerings, and w</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/60ad0f0e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/60ad0f0e/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structuring the Syndication LLC</title>
      <itunes:title>Structuring the Syndication LLC</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a7e8868-cd86-428b-9267-f8deeac0ada7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/73c9de83</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a real estate syndication LLC is more than a simple paperwork exercise. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a common assumption sponsors make when forming their entities online. We cover the tax mechanics behind choosing an LLC or LP over a corporation to avoid double taxation, and explore a whiteboard scenario where a generic Operating Agreement directly contradicts the sponsor's pitch deck. Listeners will learn why the legal document always dictates the economics of a deal, and how maintaining the LLC's asset protection shield requires operating the entity exactly as your custom agreement outlines.<p>Also see: How to Form a Real Estate Syndication LLC or Corporation — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/xUvRPb63Gig">https://youtu.be/xUvRPb63Gig</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Structuring a real estate syndication LLC is more than a simple paperwork exercise. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses a common assumption sponsors make when forming their entities online. We cover the tax mechanics behind choosing an LLC or LP over a corporation to avoid double taxation, and explore a whiteboard scenario where a generic Operating Agreement directly contradicts the sponsor's pitch deck. Listeners will learn why the legal document always dictates the economics of a deal, and how maintaining the LLC's asset protection shield requires operating the entity exactly as your custom agreement outlines.<p>Also see: How to Form a Real Estate Syndication LLC or Corporation — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/forming-syndication-llc/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/xUvRPb63Gig">https://youtu.be/xUvRPb63Gig</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:35:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/73c9de83/953ec67c.mp3" length="5460505" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUvRPb63Gig">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>368</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Structuring a real estate syndication LLC is often treated as a quick paperwork exercise. But relying on default documents can inadvertently erase your promote and shift control away from the sponsor.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Structuring a real estate syndication LLC is often treated as a quick paperwork exercise. But relying on default documents can inadvertently erase your promote and shift control away from the sponsor.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/73c9de83/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/73c9de83/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Distinction Between Syndication and Crowdfunding</title>
      <itunes:title>The Distinction Between Syndication and Crowdfunding</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3799f7a3-cf03-48b8-8864-f3e409f3ca88</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/30f5198c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often think syndication and crowdfunding are two completely different legal vehicles—one slow and traditional, the other fast and modern. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses this common confusion, explaining why real estate crowdfunding is actually just a syndication with a public marketing strategy attached. Exploring the practical differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c), Tilden highlights the hidden friction of raising capital online, from accredited investor verification requirements to the administrative weight of managing numerous small checks. Listen in to learn how to choose the right capital-raising strategy based on your existing network, rather than industry buzzwords.<p>Also see: Real Estate Crowdfunding vs. Syndication: What’s the Difference? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk">https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often think syndication and crowdfunding are two completely different legal vehicles—one slow and traditional, the other fast and modern. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti addresses this common confusion, explaining why real estate crowdfunding is actually just a syndication with a public marketing strategy attached. Exploring the practical differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c), Tilden highlights the hidden friction of raising capital online, from accredited investor verification requirements to the administrative weight of managing numerous small checks. Listen in to learn how to choose the right capital-raising strategy based on your existing network, rather than industry buzzwords.<p>Also see: Real Estate Crowdfunding vs. Syndication: What’s the Difference? — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-crowdfunding-vs-syndication/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk">https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:25:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/30f5198c/cfa813b2.mp3" length="5730282" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkwbLcmEGdk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>388</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often view syndication and crowdfunding as two entirely different legal vehicles. Tilden Moschetti breaks down why crowdfunding is simply a syndication with a different marketing strategy, and how to choose the right path for your capital raise.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often view syndication and crowdfunding as two entirely different legal vehicles. Tilden Moschetti breaks down why crowdfunding is simply a syndication with a different marketing strategy, and how to choose the right path for your capital raise.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/30f5198c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/30f5198c/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PPM Checklist: Why the Memorandum Alone Is Never Enough</title>
      <itunes:title>The PPM Checklist: Why the Memorandum Alone Is Never Enough</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c004fe4e-85a2-42a9-9dd3-f3f169cd9cbd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/dc95273a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is the single document needed to start raising capital and speed up the fundraising process. But what happens when an investor says yes to a standalone PPM? You are left with a check you cannot legally accept and an entity with no rules. In today's field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti clears up the confusion around what a PPM actually does. We walk through a practical whiteboard hypothetical to illustrate why a PPM alone is never enough, and map out the actual four-part legal package every syndication needs: the PPM (the what), the Operating Agreement (the how), the Subscription Agreement (the who), and the regulatory filings (the compliance). Tune in to learn how to structure your documents so you are fully prepared when investors are ready to commit.<p>Also see: PPM Checklist - Private Placement Memorandum Requirements — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-checklist/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-checklist/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk">https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sponsors often assume a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is the single document needed to start raising capital and speed up the fundraising process. But what happens when an investor says yes to a standalone PPM? You are left with a check you cannot legally accept and an entity with no rules. In today's field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti clears up the confusion around what a PPM actually does. We walk through a practical whiteboard hypothetical to illustrate why a PPM alone is never enough, and map out the actual four-part legal package every syndication needs: the PPM (the what), the Operating Agreement (the how), the Subscription Agreement (the who), and the regulatory filings (the compliance). Tune in to learn how to structure your documents so you are fully prepared when investors are ready to commit.<p>Also see: PPM Checklist - Private Placement Memorandum Requirements — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-checklist/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/ppm-checklist/</a></p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk">https://youtu.be/tkwbLcmEGdk</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:15:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/dc95273a/aa8179f5.mp3" length="4763498" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkwbLcmEGdk">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>319</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume a Private Placement Memorandum is all they need to start raising capital. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why a standalone PPM leaves you unable to actually accept funds, and outlines the complete four-part legal package required to close a deal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume a Private Placement Memorandum is all they need to start raising capital. In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down why a standalone PPM leaves you unable to actually accept funds, and outlines the complete</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/dc95273a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/dc95273a/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 506(b) Website Trap: Accidental General Solicitation</title>
      <itunes:title>The 506(b) Website Trap: Accidental General Solicitation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b902a11-7ff1-41a9-b952-67eb908e7a30</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8bde3633</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Using a public website to tease a Rule 506(b) syndication can easily blur the line into general solicitation. As a syndication attorney, Tilden frequently encounters the assumption that locking deal documents behind a password gate is enough to protect an exemption. In this episode, we look at the mechanics of general solicitation and why public-facing headlines like "Now Open" can trigger compliance issues before a prospective investor ever logs in. We also cover the practical difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c), and how sponsors can strategically use their website to build relationships for their next raise, rather than pitching their current one.</p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hGa3IEGsWqg">https://youtu.be/hGa3IEGsWqg</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Using a public website to tease a Rule 506(b) syndication can easily blur the line into general solicitation. As a syndication attorney, Tilden frequently encounters the assumption that locking deal documents behind a password gate is enough to protect an exemption. In this episode, we look at the mechanics of general solicitation and why public-facing headlines like "Now Open" can trigger compliance issues before a prospective investor ever logs in. We also cover the practical difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c), and how sponsors can strategically use their website to build relationships for their next raise, rather than pitching their current one.</p><p><em>Note: This episode's audio is generated using AI voice cloning technology based on Tilden Moschetti's written work.</em></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/hGa3IEGsWqg">https://youtu.be/hGa3IEGsWqg</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:50:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8bde3633/924f7fa6.mp3" length="6127591" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGa3IEGsWqg">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many sponsors assume that hiding a PPM behind a password portal protects their 506(b) raise from general solicitation. In this field note, we break down why teasing a live deal on a public website can cross the line, and how to use your site properly.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many sponsors assume that hiding a PPM behind a password portal protects their 506(b) raise from general solicitation. In this field note, we break down why teasing a live deal on a public website can cross the line, and how to use your site properly.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8bde3633/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8bde3633/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Syndication vs. Fund: Selling the Asset vs. Selling the Track Record</title>
      <itunes:title>Syndication vs. Fund: Selling the Asset vs. Selling the Track Record</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29d7ea60-c196-48a4-9fa1-541bd641fba2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/181dc56f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>=In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the practical difference between a syndication and a blind-pool fund. Many sponsors assume a fund is the more sophisticated route, but the reality of capital raising tells a different story. If you're deciding how to structure your next raise, the choice comes down to one fundamental question: Are you asking investors to underwrite the asset, or are they underwriting you? Listen to understand how the sequence of your raise dictates your legal structure, and why matching that structure to what you can actually sell right now is critical.</p><p>Also see: What is Syndication?Raising Outside Capital For Investment — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndications-and-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndications-and-funds/</a></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/${$('2b.%20Get%20Latest%20Video').first().json.items[0].snippet.resourceId.videoId}">https://youtu.be/PcpvGGy9Ra4</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>=In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti breaks down the practical difference between a syndication and a blind-pool fund. Many sponsors assume a fund is the more sophisticated route, but the reality of capital raising tells a different story. If you're deciding how to structure your next raise, the choice comes down to one fundamental question: Are you asking investors to underwrite the asset, or are they underwriting you? Listen to understand how the sequence of your raise dictates your legal structure, and why matching that structure to what you can actually sell right now is critical.</p><p>Also see: What is Syndication?Raising Outside Capital For Investment — <a href="https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndications-and-funds/">https://www.moschettilaw.com/syndications-and-funds/</a></p><p>Watch the video on YouTube: <a href="https://youtu.be/${$('2b.%20Get%20Latest%20Video').first().json.items[0].snippet.resourceId.videoId}">https://youtu.be/PcpvGGy9Ra4</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 19:33:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/181dc56f/6e5da5f7.mp3" length="4615523" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <podcast:contentLink href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcpvGGy9Ra4">Watch on YouTube</podcast:contentLink>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>308</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sponsors often assume launching a fund is the more sophisticated way to raise capital. But as a syndication attorney, I often see that blind-pool funds can actually be much harder to fill. Here is the practical difference between a syndication and a fund, and how to choose the right structure.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sponsors often assume launching a fund is the more sophisticated way to raise capital. But as a syndication attorney, I often see that blind-pool funds can actually be much harder to fill. Here is the practical difference between a syndication and a fund,</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/181dc56f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/181dc56f/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fund vs. Syndication in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>Fund vs. Syndication in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec724acc-4adf-4bbc-ad6d-dcc3221b5101</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a9339025</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we look at the transition from a single-asset real estate syndication to a blind-pool fund. While both can be raised as Regulation D private placements, the legal container is fundamentally different. A syndication is built around one known asset, while a fund is built around a sponsor's strategy and track record. We explain how this shift affects PPM disclosures and capital calls, and discuss potential investment adviser risk if a fund moves from buying direct real estate into buying LP interests in other syndications. Let your pipeline dictate your legal structure.<p>Also see: Fund vs. Syndication: Regulation D Legal Guide for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-vs-syndication-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we look at the transition from a single-asset real estate syndication to a blind-pool fund. While both can be raised as Regulation D private placements, the legal container is fundamentally different. A syndication is built around one known asset, while a fund is built around a sponsor's strategy and track record. We explain how this shift affects PPM disclosures and capital calls, and discuss potential investment adviser risk if a fund moves from buying direct real estate into buying LP interests in other syndications. Let your pipeline dictate your legal structure.<p>Also see: Fund vs. Syndication: Regulation D Legal Guide for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/fund-vs-syndication-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a9339025/a26ade0f.mp3" length="5920017" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>370</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the legal differences between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool investment fund raised as Regulation D private placements.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the legal differences between a single-asset syndication and a blind-pool investment fund raised as Regulation D private placements.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a9339025/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sponsor Entity vs. Investment Entity vs. Asset SPV in Reg D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Sponsor Entity vs. Investment Entity vs. Asset SPV in Reg D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">707c4686-60d3-44ad-b75e-9d408297dc1a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b2afe730</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the three-box legal architecture for a Reg D syndication: the Sponsor Entity, the Investment Entity, and the Asset SPV. Placing management, LP capital, and property liability into a single LLC can raise risk concentration issues. We discuss how separating these functions helps reduce gridlock, clarify who the actual issuer of the securities is, and isolate asset-level liability. Learn how authority flows down, cash flows up, and why an SPV acts as a firewall rather than a guaranteed forcefield.<p>Also see: Sponsor Entity, Investment Entity &amp; SPVs in Reg D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the three-box legal architecture for a Reg D syndication: the Sponsor Entity, the Investment Entity, and the Asset SPV. Placing management, LP capital, and property liability into a single LLC can raise risk concentration issues. We discuss how separating these functions helps reduce gridlock, clarify who the actual issuer of the securities is, and isolate asset-level liability. Learn how authority flows down, cash flows up, and why an SPV acts as a firewall rather than a guaranteed forcefield.<p>Also see: Sponsor Entity, Investment Entity &amp; SPVs in Reg D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-entity-structure</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:23:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b2afe730/b7b7e5cb.mp3" length="6280298" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D syndication often uses a three-box entity structure—a Sponsor Entity, an Investment Entity, and an Asset SPV—to separate management control, LP capital, and property-level liability.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D syndication often uses a three-box entity structure—a Sponsor Entity, an Investment Entity, and an Asset SPV—to separate management control, LP capital, and property-level </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b2afe730/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Form D vs. a PPM in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>Form D vs. a PPM in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc2418dc-0ff1-4145-a0cd-4d0db25d59c2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/28e66cde</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we address a common misconception in Regulation D private placements: treating a Form D filing as a substitute for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Tilden explains the distinct roles of each document. A PPM provides pre-sale investor disclosure and documents deal risks, while Form D serves as a post-sale administrative notice to the SEC. Understanding this separation can help sponsors build a stronger, more credible foundation for their capital raise. Read the full article: [ARTICLE_URL]<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we address a common misconception in Regulation D private placements: treating a Form D filing as a substitute for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Tilden explains the distinct roles of each document. A PPM provides pre-sale investor disclosure and documents deal risks, while Form D serves as a post-sale administrative notice to the SEC. Understanding this separation can help sponsors build a stronger, more credible foundation for their capital raise. Read the full article: [ARTICLE_URL]<p>Also see: Form D vs. a PPM: Regulation D Filing vs. Disclosure at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-vs-ppm</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:18:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/28e66cde/fe18f59c.mp3" length="5735279" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>359</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Form D filing does not replace a PPM in a Regulation D private placement. Learn the difference between pre-sale investor disclosure and post-sale regulator notice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Form D filing does not replace a PPM in a Regulation D private placement. Learn the difference between pre-sale investor disclosure and post-sale regulator notice.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/28e66cde/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When Is Form D Due in a Regulation D Offering?</title>
      <itunes:title>When Is Form D Due in a Regulation D Offering?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cace52a3-66a7-49a8-b189-bd832c55e2b8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0bf3191d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we examine the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume the filing clock starts when an investor's wire clears. The reality is that the 15-calendar-day deadline generally runs from the first sale, which often occurs when a binding subscription is accepted. Tilden explains how this timeline works, why rolling closes do not delay the federal deadline, and how late filings can create state Blue Sky notice filing fees.<p>Also see: When Is Form D Due? First Sale in Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we examine the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume the filing clock starts when an investor's wire clears. The reality is that the 15-calendar-day deadline generally runs from the first sale, which often occurs when a binding subscription is accepted. Tilden explains how this timeline works, why rolling closes do not delay the federal deadline, and how late filings can create state Blue Sky notice filing fees.<p>Also see: When Is Form D Due? First Sale in Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/form-d-reg-d-deadline</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:03:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0bf3191d/bd3ca75e.mp3" length="5825559" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>365</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how to calculate the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement, noting that the 15-calendar-day clock often starts when a subscription is accepted rather than when the wire clears.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how to calculate the Form D deadline in a Regulation D private placement, noting that the 15-calendar-day clock often starts when a subscription is accepted rather than when the wire clears.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0bf3191d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees</title>
      <itunes:title>Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50980867-42f7-410e-b0b7-bcdd48dd85c1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/273abf54</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore Blue Sky Laws in the context of a Rule 506 offering. While federal law generally preempts full state registration, sponsors can still be responsible for state notice filings and filing fees. Tilden explains how investor residency drives the state filing map, why the federal Form D serves as your master document, and how states retain their anti-fraud authority. This field note clarifies the administrative reality of multi-state capital raises.<p>Also see: Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees at https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws-rule-506</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore Blue Sky Laws in the context of a Rule 506 offering. While federal law generally preempts full state registration, sponsors can still be responsible for state notice filings and filing fees. Tilden explains how investor residency drives the state filing map, why the federal Form D serves as your master document, and how states retain their anti-fraud authority. This field note clarifies the administrative reality of multi-state capital raises.<p>Also see: Blue Sky Laws for Rule 506 Offerings: Notices and Fees at https://www.moschettilaw.com/blue-sky-laws-rule-506</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:03:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/273abf54/fc9b39e8.mp3" length="6454169" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how Blue Sky Laws apply to a Rule 506 Regulation D private placement, focusing on state notice filings, fees, and investor residency.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how Blue Sky Laws apply to a Rule 506 Regulation D private placement, focusing on state notice filings, fees, and investor residency.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/273abf54/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SEC Form D Deadlines in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>SEC Form D Deadlines in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad191f13-fdfe-417a-b9a7-5886cfed3864</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9850b5dc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we explore the SEC Form D filing timeline for a Regulation D private placement. Treating Form D as after-closing paperwork can create timing and operational challenges. The episode explains how the 15-day deadline is tied to the first sale—often the irrevocable investor commitment rather than the final wire transfer. We also discuss why SEC EDGAR access takes time to set up and how a federal Form D filing connects to state Blue Sky notice filings. Tune in to understand how to map your federal and state filing timelines before accepting the first investor dollar.<p>Also see: SEC Form D Filing Deadlines for Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we explore the SEC Form D filing timeline for a Regulation D private placement. Treating Form D as after-closing paperwork can create timing and operational challenges. The episode explains how the 15-day deadline is tied to the first sale—often the irrevocable investor commitment rather than the final wire transfer. We also discuss why SEC EDGAR access takes time to set up and how a federal Form D filing connects to state Blue Sky notice filings. Tune in to understand how to map your federal and state filing timelines before accepting the first investor dollar.<p>Also see: SEC Form D Filing Deadlines for Regulation D Offerings at https://www.moschettilaw.com/sec-form-d-deadlines</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:02:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9850b5dc/ff87dd86.mp3" length="5588158" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the SEC Form D filing process for Regulation D private placements, detailing how the 15-day first-sale deadline, EDGAR setup, and state Blue Sky notice filings work together.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the SEC Form D filing process for Regulation D private placements, detailing how the 15-day first-sale deadline, EDGAR setup, and state Blue Sky notice filings work together.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9850b5dc/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is an Investor Questionnaire in a Regulation D Private Placement?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is an Investor Questionnaire in a Regulation D Private Placement?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">163df5ff-d565-476f-934d-afbcf1b24e36</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/535ffa49</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the role of the investor questionnaire in a Regulation D private placement. Sponsors often confuse this legal eligibility document with a retail risk-tolerance survey. The episode clarifies how the right questionnaire helps establish accredited investor status by capturing income, net worth, and entity details. We also discuss how the form's role can shift depending on whether the offering relies on Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is an Investor Questionnaire for Regulation D? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the role of the investor questionnaire in a Regulation D private placement. Sponsors often confuse this legal eligibility document with a retail risk-tolerance survey. The episode clarifies how the right questionnaire helps establish accredited investor status by capturing income, net worth, and entity details. We also discuss how the form's role can shift depending on whether the offering relies on Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is an Investor Questionnaire for Regulation D? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/investor-questionnaire-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:17:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/535ffa49/5eb2aa0a.mp3" length="6732112" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>421</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the investor questionnaire functions in a Regulation D private placement to help determine accredited investor status, rather than assessing retail risk tolerance.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the investor questionnaire functions in a Regulation D private placement to help determine accredited investor status, rather than assessing retail risk tolerance.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/535ffa49/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subscription Agreement vs. PPM vs. Operating Agreement in Reg D</title>
      <itunes:title>Subscription Agreement vs. PPM vs. Operating Agreement in Reg D</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f7c459e-b9c1-4d3e-8577-cabba87b551c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/add900b5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the distinct roles of the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement in a Regulation D private placement. Treating these documents as simple onboarding forms can create legal and operational gaps for a syndication sponsor. Listen to understand the difference between disclosure, governance, and admission, and why a signed Subscription Agreement and a cleared wire are only an offer to invest until the sponsor formally countersigns.<p>Also see: Subscription Agreement vs PPM vs Operating Agreement: Reg D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the distinct roles of the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement in a Regulation D private placement. Treating these documents as simple onboarding forms can create legal and operational gaps for a syndication sponsor. Listen to understand the difference between disclosure, governance, and admission, and why a signed Subscription Agreement and a cleared wire are only an offer to invest until the sponsor formally countersigns.<p>Also see: Subscription Agreement vs PPM vs Operating Agreement: Reg D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-subscription-ppm-operating</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:07:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/add900b5/5487e3ab.mp3" length="5342816" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>334</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement work together in a Regulation D private placement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the PPM, Operating Agreement, and Subscription Agreement work together in a Regulation D private placement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/add900b5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification</title>
      <itunes:title>Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41218580-c2c9-4d92-88ef-ec55005368ff</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a69ac2e2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the boundary between a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire and Rule 506(c) verification. When a sponsor publicly advertises a specific offering through general solicitation, the legal standard shifts from an investor self-certifying their status to the sponsor taking reasonable steps to verify it. Tilden explains why legacy paperwork does not easily carry over to new public raises, how a professional confirmation letter can reduce onboarding friction, and why verification portals act as workflow tools rather than liability shields.<p>Also see: Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification at https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the boundary between a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire and Rule 506(c) verification. When a sponsor publicly advertises a specific offering through general solicitation, the legal standard shifts from an investor self-certifying their status to the sponsor taking reasonable steps to verify it. Tilden explains why legacy paperwork does not easily carry over to new public raises, how a professional confirmation letter can reduce onboarding friction, and why verification portals act as workflow tools rather than liability shields.<p>Also see: Accredited Investor Questionnaire vs. 506(c) Verification at https://www.moschettilaw.com/accredited-investor-506c-verification</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:07:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a69ac2e2/2b98ee50.mp3" length="5689722" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>356</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire is not enough for a publicly advertised Rule 506(c) Regulation D private placement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a Rule 506(b) accredited investor questionnaire is not enough for a publicly advertised Rule 506(c) Regulation D private placement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a69ac2e2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0eaed8b0-fc78-479f-919a-3c479ef94df9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7e9abe81</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains what a Subscription Agreement actually does in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume a signed form and a wire mean an investor has officially joined the syndication. However, the investor's signature is merely an offer of capital. The agreement binds only when the sponsor accepts and countersigns. This episode covers how the document records vital investor representations and warranties, how it interacts with the PPM and Operating Agreement, and how it handles accredited investor claims under Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains what a Subscription Agreement actually does in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume a signed form and a wire mean an investor has officially joined the syndication. However, the investor's signature is merely an offer of capital. The agreement binds only when the sponsor accepts and countersigns. This episode covers how the document records vital investor representations and warranties, how it interacts with the PPM and Operating Agreement, and how it handles accredited investor claims under Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).<p>Also see: What Is a Subscription Agreement in a Private Placement? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/subscription-agreement-private-placement</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:06:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7e9abe81/44e1d58d.mp3" length="6057526" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>379</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Subscription Agreement functions as the point-of-sale contract in a Regulation D private placement, rather than just routine onboarding paperwork.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Subscription Agreement functions as the point-of-sale contract in a Regulation D private placement, rather than just routine onboarding paperwork.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7e9abe81/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LLC vs. LP Entity Choice for Regulation D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>LLC vs. LP Entity Choice for Regulation D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c635a1c-a826-44e1-a239-a2bb009cab88</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6e289c06</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we explore the LLC vs. LP entity choice for Regulation D syndications. Choosing the right container for a private placement is an architectural decision that affects sponsor liability and investor expectations. Tilden explains why manager-managed LLCs often fit raises involving individual accredited investors, and why institutional capital frequently points toward an LP. Crucially, the episode covers the potential 'Naked GP' trap in Limited Partnerships and how adding a GP LLC dual-entity structure can help manage sponsor exposure.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this episode does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding your specific securities offering.<p>Also see: Limited Liability Company vs. LP for Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. 

In this episode, we explore the LLC vs. LP entity choice for Regulation D syndications. Choosing the right container for a private placement is an architectural decision that affects sponsor liability and investor expectations. Tilden explains why manager-managed LLCs often fit raises involving individual accredited investors, and why institutional capital frequently points toward an LP. Crucially, the episode covers the potential 'Naked GP' trap in Limited Partnerships and how adding a GP LLC dual-entity structure can help manage sponsor exposure.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this episode does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding your specific securities offering.<p>Also see: Limited Liability Company vs. LP for Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/llc-vs-lp-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6e289c06/d17c0675.mp3" length="6161598" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>386</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how LLC vs. LP entity choice in a Regulation D syndication affects sponsor liability and investor expectations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how LLC vs. LP entity choice in a Regulation D syndication affects sponsor liability and investor expectations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6e289c06/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">609b2a72-8936-4054-9f54-c8c6bdb20d13</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/77f02047</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. Today's note covers the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a private fund. The episode explains how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital coming in, GP authority, and the distribution waterfall—distinct from the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Subscription Agreement. Tune in to understand why the legal text of your LPA should accurately reflect your fund's operational reality.<p>Also see: What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. Today's note covers the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a private fund. The episode explains how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital coming in, GP authority, and the distribution waterfall—distinct from the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Subscription Agreement. Tune in to understand why the legal text of your LPA should accurately reflect your fund's operational reality.<p>Also see: What Is a Limited Partnership Agreement in a Private Fund? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/limited-partnership-agreement-private-fund</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:21:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/77f02047/e5a9e82e.mp3" length="5677183" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>355</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the role of a Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a Regulation D private fund. The episode clarifies how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital calls, GP authority, and the distribution waterfall—distinct from the PPM.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains the role of a Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) in a Regulation D private fund. The episode clarifies how the LPA acts as the binding operating contract—governing capital calls, GP</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/77f02047/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is an Operating Agreement in a Regulation D Syndication?</title>
      <itunes:title>What Is an Operating Agreement in a Regulation D Syndication?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e385b4f-746f-42dd-a66e-645cd0bfe3fb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7cc324ee</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the distinct roles of the Private Placement Memorandum and the LLC Operating Agreement. If the PPM is the brochure, the Operating Agreement is the engine. We explain how this binding contract governs the distribution waterfall, preferred returns, sponsor promote, and manager control in a private placement capital raise.<p>Also see: What Is an Operating Agreement in a Reg D Syndication? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the distinct roles of the Private Placement Memorandum and the LLC Operating Agreement. If the PPM is the brochure, the Operating Agreement is the engine. We explain how this binding contract governs the distribution waterfall, preferred returns, sponsor promote, and manager control in a private placement capital raise.<p>Also see: What Is an Operating Agreement in a Reg D Syndication? at https://www.moschettilaw.com/operating-agreement-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:12:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7cc324ee/0c5fa06f.mp3" length="6860008" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>429</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how the LLC Operating Agreement turns PPM disclosures into binding mechanics for sponsor control, fees, and distributions in a Regulation D syndication capital raise.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how the LLC Operating Agreement turns PPM disclosures into binding mechanics for sponsor control, fees, and distributions in a Regulation D syndication capital raise.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7cc324ee/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Operating Agreement vs. PPM vs. Subscription Agreement in a Reg D Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>Operating Agreement vs. PPM vs. Subscription Agreement in a Reg D Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cae96773-5018-4fda-8a66-d9622aa9a4ee</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/411d4f9b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the difference between the Operating Agreement, the PPM, and the Subscription Agreement in a private placement. Treating these documents as interchangeable forms can create document drift right before a closing. The episode explains how to view them as one coordinated legal engine: the Operating Agreement for governance, the PPM for disclosure, and the Subscription Agreement for execution.<p>Also see: Reg D: Operating Agreement vs PPM vs Subscription Agreement at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the difference between the Operating Agreement, the PPM, and the Subscription Agreement in a private placement. Treating these documents as interchangeable forms can create document drift right before a closing. The episode explains how to view them as one coordinated legal engine: the Operating Agreement for governance, the PPM for disclosure, and the Subscription Agreement for execution.<p>Also see: Reg D: Operating Agreement vs PPM vs Subscription Agreement at https://www.moschettilaw.com/reg-d-operating-ppm-subscription</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:46:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/411d4f9b/de0cc7a5.mp3" length="6284896" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a Regulation D private placement, confusing your offering documents can create inconsistencies. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Operating Agreement, PPM, and Subscription Agreement work as one coordinated system for governance, disclosure, and execution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a Regulation D private placement, confusing your offering documents can create inconsistencies. Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the Operating Agreement, PPM, and Subscription Agreement work as one coordinated system for governance, d</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/411d4f9b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a PPM Matters in Regulation D Private Placements</title>
      <itunes:title>Why a PPM Matters in Regulation D Private Placements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a3b5ed0-46ba-45c9-b5a9-6fc29a22e993</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1c04222</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) matters even if your Regulation D private placement accepts only accredited investors. While an exemption like Rule 506(c) may not prescribe a specific disclosure format, anti-fraud rules regarding material omissions still apply to the securities offering. Tilden explains how a PPM can help document that risks, conflicts of interest, and material facts were clearly disclosed before accepting investor capital.<p>Also see: Why You Need a Private Placement Memorandum in Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) matters even if your Regulation D private placement accepts only accredited investors. While an exemption like Rule 506(c) may not prescribe a specific disclosure format, anti-fraud rules regarding material omissions still apply to the securities offering. Tilden explains how a PPM can help document that risks, conflicts of interest, and material facts were clearly disclosed before accepting investor capital.<p>Also see: Why You Need a Private Placement Memorandum in Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/private-placement-memorandum-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:41:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c1c04222/411b6409.mp3" length="7320181" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>458</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) can still be a valuable disclosure record in a Regulation D private placement, even when raising capital exclusively from accredited investors.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) can still be a valuable disclosure record in a Regulation D private placement, even when raising capital exclusively from accredited investor</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c1c04222/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asset Management vs Property Management in Real Estate Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Asset Management vs Property Management in Real Estate Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df484c80-fd49-4c03-91c9-79a9038e9b63</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2131755f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors navigating asset management vs property management in a real estate syndication. This episode explains the difference between building-level property management work and investment-level asset management strategy. Blurring these roles can create fee structure issues and confusion over a sponsor's fiduciary duties to limited partners. Listen to learn how to properly separate asset management fees from property management fees, handle affiliate conflicts when using a sponsor-owned property manager, and clearly document these arrangements in your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and standalone property management agreement.<p>Also see: Asset Management vs Property Management in Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors navigating asset management vs property management in a real estate syndication. This episode explains the difference between building-level property management work and investment-level asset management strategy. Blurring these roles can create fee structure issues and confusion over a sponsor's fiduciary duties to limited partners. Listen to learn how to properly separate asset management fees from property management fees, handle affiliate conflicts when using a sponsor-owned property manager, and clearly document these arrangements in your Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and standalone property management agreement.<p>Also see: Asset Management vs Property Management in Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/asset-vs-property-management-syndications</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:50:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2131755f/d5f1aae6.mp3" length="8351286" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>522</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how sponsors can cleanly separate asset management from property management in a real estate syndication, and why blurring the two can raise fee and fiduciary duty questions.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short legal field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on how sponsors can cleanly separate asset management from property management in a real estate syndication, and why blurring the two can raise fee and fiduciary duty questions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2131755f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators</title>
      <itunes:title>144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bf0c770-d2f3-4cbd-a9d4-71626321f42e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/78f32944</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A 144A offering can sound like a faster private placement, but for most mid-market syndicators, it may not be the appropriate framework. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti unpacks why Rule 144A is designed as a resale safe harbor for Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), while Regulation D serves as the issuer exemption for primary capital raises. Listeners will learn the mechanical difference between secondary resales and primary issuances, the wealth gap between accredited investors and QIBs, and why building clean Regulation D infrastructure is usually the practical path for an investment fund securities offering.<p>Also see: 144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators at https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A 144A offering can sound like a faster private placement, but for most mid-market syndicators, it may not be the appropriate framework. In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti unpacks why Rule 144A is designed as a resale safe harbor for Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), while Regulation D serves as the issuer exemption for primary capital raises. Listeners will learn the mechanical difference between secondary resales and primary issuances, the wealth gap between accredited investors and QIBs, and why building clean Regulation D infrastructure is usually the practical path for an investment fund securities offering.<p>Also see: 144A Offering vs Regulation D for Mid-Market Syndicators at https://www.moschettilaw.com/144a-offering-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:23:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/78f32944/81f9439f.mp3" length="7337735" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>459</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a 144A offering is a resale safe harbor for QIBs, not a primary capital raise. Mid-market sponsors issuing new securities in a private placement generally rely on Regulation D instead.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a 144A offering is a resale safe harbor for QIBs, not a primary capital raise. Mid-market sponsors issuing new securities in a private placement genera</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/78f32944/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c359273-2bc9-44e7-b322-35c59a7f4493</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0ab837b1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores when a real estate joint venture moves into potential securities offering territory. Many sponsors believe that raising passive capital from just a few friends under a JV agreement keeps the deal outside of federal securities law. However, if the capital partners are simply writing checks and relying on the sponsor's efforts for profit, the arrangement may need to be analyzed as a Regulation D syndication. Tune in to learn how economic reality, practical control, and industry expertise separate true active joint ventures from passive real estate investments.<p>Also see: Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explores when a real estate joint venture moves into potential securities offering territory. Many sponsors believe that raising passive capital from just a few friends under a JV agreement keeps the deal outside of federal securities law. However, if the capital partners are simply writing checks and relying on the sponsor's efforts for profit, the arrangement may need to be analyzed as a Regulation D syndication. Tune in to learn how economic reality, practical control, and industry expertise separate true active joint ventures from passive real estate investments.<p>Also see: Real Estate Joint Ventures vs. Regulation D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/real-estate-jv-vs-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:26:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0ab837b1/5452215f.mp3" length="6643923" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how raising passive capital for a real estate deal can move an arrangement out of joint venture territory and into a potential Regulation D syndication.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how raising passive capital for a real estate deal can move an arrangement out of joint venture territory and into a potential Regulation D syndication.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0ab837b1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using a Convertible Promissory Note Before a Rule 506 Offering</title>
      <itunes:title>Using a Convertible Promissory Note Before a Rule 506 Offering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">626e86b8-90ef-4ec4-9d51-729a3ed640db</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b4dff86e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we look at why using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement acts as a current debt liability. A real estate syndication sponsor often uses these notes to secure early funds, but treating them as future equity can raise unexpected issues with senior lender covenants, subordination, and SEC integration. We cover why startup templates generally do not fit a leveraged capital stack and how to structure early money so it aligns with both the commercial bank and the main Regulation D offering.<p>Also see: Convertible Promissory Note for Real Estate Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we look at why using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement acts as a current debt liability. A real estate syndication sponsor often uses these notes to secure early funds, but treating them as future equity can raise unexpected issues with senior lender covenants, subordination, and SEC integration. We cover why startup templates generally do not fit a leveraged capital stack and how to structure early money so it aligns with both the commercial bank and the main Regulation D offering.<p>Also see: Convertible Promissory Note for Real Estate Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/convertible-promissory-note-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b4dff86e/174bd938.mp3" length="8038653" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>503</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement can create immediate debt liabilities, affecting senior lender covenants and SEC integration.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how using a convertible promissory note for bridge capital before a Rule 506 private placement can create immediate debt liabilities, affecting senior lender covenants and SEC integration.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b4dff86e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals</title>
      <itunes:title>Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f785a35a-da3e-49dc-81e4-df1cc9b2ef61</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cbb64bf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

When a sponsor buys property through a real estate syndication, deciding where the asset sits in the entity stack is a primary structural choice. In this episode, we explore the role of the single purpose entity (SPE) in an investment fund. The issue is often confused with generic LLC formation, but an SPE is intentionally restricted by lender covenants to own one asset and carry one commercial mortgage.

The episode explains why reusing an old dormant LLC may raise underwriting concerns for commercial lenders, and details the typical three-tier structure of a multi-asset real estate fund. Listeners will learn how separating the investor-facing fund entity from the lender-facing asset-level LLC helps keep the capital raise and the commercial debt in their respective lanes.<p>Also see: Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals at https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds.

When a sponsor buys property through a real estate syndication, deciding where the asset sits in the entity stack is a primary structural choice. In this episode, we explore the role of the single purpose entity (SPE) in an investment fund. The issue is often confused with generic LLC formation, but an SPE is intentionally restricted by lender covenants to own one asset and carry one commercial mortgage.

The episode explains why reusing an old dormant LLC may raise underwriting concerns for commercial lenders, and details the typical three-tier structure of a multi-asset real estate fund. Listeners will learn how separating the investor-facing fund entity from the lender-facing asset-level LLC helps keep the capital raise and the commercial debt in their respective lanes.<p>Also see: Single Purpose Entity in Real Estate Syndication Deals at https://www.moschettilaw.com/single-purpose-entity-syndication</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 22:05:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0cbb64bf/ee52c73c.mp3" length="8843224" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>553</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how a single purpose entity (SPE) functions in a Regulation D real estate syndication to keep property collateral, commercial debt, and investor capital in separate lanes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how a single purpose entity (SPE) functions in a Regulation D real estate syndication to keep property collateral, commercial debt, and investor capital in separate lanes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0cbb64bf/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hedge Fund Incubator Before a Regulation D Fund Raise</title>
      <itunes:title>Hedge Fund Incubator Before a Regulation D Fund Raise</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ce34782-9128-4f9e-99a0-779d801ae7b0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/784d8dba</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A hedge fund incubator is a business phase, not an SEC exemption. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the transition from trading proprietary capital to accepting outside investor capital changes your legal framework. Taking passive money—even from friends and family—or publicly promoting returns can move a project into a Regulation D private fund offering. We cover track record marketing, net-of-fee performance, and why it can be helpful to decide on your private placement structure before taking outside funds.<p>Also see: Hedge Fund Incubator: From Trading to Regulation D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A hedge fund incubator is a business phase, not an SEC exemption. In this episode of Syndication Attorney Field Notes, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how the transition from trading proprietary capital to accepting outside investor capital changes your legal framework. Taking passive money—even from friends and family—or publicly promoting returns can move a project into a Regulation D private fund offering. We cover track record marketing, net-of-fee performance, and why it can be helpful to decide on your private placement structure before taking outside funds.<p>Also see: Hedge Fund Incubator: From Trading to Regulation D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/hedge-fund-incubator-regulation-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:17:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/784d8dba/ef8120b9.mp3" length="7700524" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>482</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how an emerging manager's hedge fund incubator phase can transition into a Regulation D private fund offering once outside investor capital is introduced.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how an emerging manager's hedge fund incubator phase can transition into a Regulation D private fund offering once outside investor capital is introduced.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/784d8dba/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors</title>
      <itunes:title>Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">931f029b-95c0-4139-bd84-7ca22f5d0807</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0f24609d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings. In this episode: why a clean Rule 506 capital raise does not answer whether the management company may have exempt reporting adviser status questions. Tilden explains the separation between the Securities Act and the Investment Advisers Act, how the $150 million RAUM threshold functions for private fund sponsors, and why uncalled capital commitments and state Blue Sky adviser rules can affect a management company's regulatory posture.<p>Also see: Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings. In this episode: why a clean Rule 506 capital raise does not answer whether the management company may have exempt reporting adviser status questions. Tilden explains the separation between the Securities Act and the Investment Advisers Act, how the $150 million RAUM threshold functions for private fund sponsors, and why uncalled capital commitments and state Blue Sky adviser rules can affect a management company's regulatory posture.<p>Also see: Exempt Reporting Adviser Status for Reg D Fund Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/exempt-reporting-adviser-private-funds</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:35:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0f24609d/d3994913.mp3" length="6921866" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>433</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D private placement covers the capital raise, but the private fund management company may still need to evaluate exempt reporting adviser status.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why a Regulation D private placement covers the capital raise, but the private fund management company may still need to evaluate exempt reporting adviser status.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0f24609d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real Estate Development Financing: Regulation D Equity and Senior Debt</title>
      <itunes:title>Real Estate Development Financing: Regulation D Equity and Senior Debt</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d57e71ab-93ce-43c0-b456-5f689f1d27b3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6b8107b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development deal can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt. If an operating agreement promises mandatory distributions or secondary investor liens, it may raise subordination issues during bank review. Tilden explains the distinction between financial feasibility and legal feasibility, illustrating how the legal architecture of the equity layer can determine whether a development financing moves forward.

Read the full field note: [ARTICLE_URL]

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. The discussion of real estate development financing and Regulation D offerings is general in nature. Every capital raise depends on specific facts. Consult a qualified attorney before structuring your capital stack.<p>Also see: Real Estate Development Financing with Regulation D Equity at https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development deal can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt. If an operating agreement promises mandatory distributions or secondary investor liens, it may raise subordination issues during bank review. Tilden explains the distinction between financial feasibility and legal feasibility, illustrating how the legal architecture of the equity layer can determine whether a development financing moves forward.

Read the full field note: [ARTICLE_URL]

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. The discussion of real estate development financing and Regulation D offerings is general in nature. Every capital raise depends on specific facts. Consult a qualified attorney before structuring your capital stack.<p>Also see: Real Estate Development Financing with Regulation D Equity at https://www.moschettilaw.com/development-financing-reg-d-equity</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 19:37:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c6b8107b/2da3b3fa.mp3" length="8154427" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>510</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt covenants.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on why a profitable real estate development can stall when Regulation D private placement equity terms conflict with senior commercial debt covenants.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6b8107b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>506(c) vs 506(b): Private Raise or Public Marketing</title>
      <itunes:title>506(c) vs 506(b): Private Raise or Public Marketing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75e66832-e21f-47db-abd5-e71dc5f9f0e7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/089f5246</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice. A common mismatch occurs when a sponsor wants the flexibility of a private 506(b) raise but the visibility of a public marketing campaign. We look at why the choice of exemption is ultimately a capital-source decision, the practical difference between private relationship discipline and general solicitation, and how accredited investor verification factors into the Rule 506(c) path.<p>Also see: 506(c) vs 506(b): Regulation D Capital Raise Choices at https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice. A common mismatch occurs when a sponsor wants the flexibility of a private 506(b) raise but the visibility of a public marketing campaign. We look at why the choice of exemption is ultimately a capital-source decision, the practical difference between private relationship discipline and general solicitation, and how accredited investor verification factors into the Rule 506(c) path.<p>Also see: 506(c) vs 506(b): Regulation D Capital Raise Choices at https://www.moschettilaw.com/506c-vs-506b-private-placement</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:32:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/089f5246/0dcc75af.mp3" length="8281487" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>518</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can evaluate the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice for a Regulation D private placement. The decision depends on whether the capital raise relies on private relationships or public marketing.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can evaluate the Rule 506(c) vs Rule 506(b) exemption choice for a Regulation D private placement. The decision depends on whether the capital raise relies on private relation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/089f5246/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors</title>
      <itunes:title>Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8cafe514-5baf-4bab-a99d-8c7c06277cc4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b383c31d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the choice between closed-end vs open-end private equity funds. A common misconception is that an open-end fund is simply an evergreen marketing wrapper. Depending on the facts, an open-end structure can create significant operational demands, including continuous NAV calculation, redemption gates, lock-ups, and ongoing Form D amendments. Tilden explains why your private placement structure should follow your asset liquidity, and how to match your redemption rights to what the underlying assets can actually support.<p>Also see: Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we explore the choice between closed-end vs open-end private equity funds. A common misconception is that an open-end fund is simply an evergreen marketing wrapper. Depending on the facts, an open-end structure can create significant operational demands, including continuous NAV calculation, redemption gates, lock-ups, and ongoing Form D amendments. Tilden explains why your private placement structure should follow your asset liquidity, and how to match your redemption rights to what the underlying assets can actually support.<p>Also see: Closed-End vs Open-End Private Equity Funds for Sponsors at https://www.moschettilaw.com/closed-end-open-end-private-equity-funds</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 23:01:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b383c31d/f671706a.mp3" length="7568031" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>473</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors should navigate closed-end vs open-end private equity funds in a Regulation D offering. The choice ultimately comes down to matching the private fund's legal structure to the underlying asset liquidity.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors should navigate closed-end vs open-end private equity funds in a Regulation D offering. The choice ultimately comes down to matching the private fund's legal structure to the </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b383c31d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications</title>
      <itunes:title>Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17bc7179-475c-49f8-b86f-9fe0628cd323</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/68fd1ea5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we look at preferred equity investments in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume preferred equity is a standard yield product, but it is actually a set of priority distribution rights drafted into the LLC operating agreement waterfall. The episode explains how a properly drafted preferred return can create a soft accrual rather than a hard debt default, giving the sponsor flexibility during a cash flow pause. Tilden also highlights the potential overlap with senior lender covenants, tax treatment, and offering documents, showing why the pitch deck and PPM should frame the investment as a priority position rather than a guaranteed return.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital. In this episode, we look at preferred equity investments in a Regulation D private placement. Many sponsors assume preferred equity is a standard yield product, but it is actually a set of priority distribution rights drafted into the LLC operating agreement waterfall. The episode explains how a properly drafted preferred return can create a soft accrual rather than a hard debt default, giving the sponsor flexibility during a cash flow pause. Tilden also highlights the potential overlap with senior lender covenants, tax treatment, and offering documents, showing why the pitch deck and PPM should frame the investment as a priority position rather than a guaranteed return.<p>Also see: Preferred Equity Investments in Reg D Syndications at https://www.moschettilaw.com/preferred-equity-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:07:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/68fd1ea5/5b74a0cb.mp3" length="7444733" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>466</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this short legal field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can use preferred equity investments as a drafted waterfall priority in a Regulation D private placement, rather than treating them as a generic yield product.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this short legal field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains how sponsors can use preferred equity investments as a drafted waterfall priority in a Regulation D private placement, rather than treating them as a generic yield product.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/68fd1ea5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oil Rig Fund Structure in a Regulation D Private Placement</title>
      <itunes:title>Oil Rig Fund Structure in a Regulation D Private Placement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2211f40-d12e-48eb-9804-b80c96926a6f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ba2794d3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[=A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains the legal architecture of an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement. Tilden breaks down the importance of establishing a liability firewall between operational risk and passive investor capital, the role of operating agreement drafting in supporting potential tax pass-through treatment for items like Intangible Drilling Costs (IDCs), and the practical marketing differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). Finally, he explains how paying transaction-based finder's fees for investor introductions may raise broker-dealer registration issues.<p>Also see: Oil Rig Fund Structure: Liability, Tax, Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[=A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains the legal architecture of an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement. Tilden breaks down the importance of establishing a liability firewall between operational risk and passive investor capital, the role of operating agreement drafting in supporting potential tax pass-through treatment for items like Intangible Drilling Costs (IDCs), and the practical marketing differences between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). Finally, he explains how paying transaction-based finder's fees for investor introductions may raise broker-dealer registration issues.<p>Also see: Oil Rig Fund Structure: Liability, Tax, Regulation D at https://www.moschettilaw.com/oil-rig-fund-legal-structure</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:36:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ba2794d3/cbb9662d.mp3" length="8829013" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>552</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains why an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement requires separating drilling risk from passive investor capital.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short field note from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti on building the legal container for an oil and gas fund before the capital raise. This episode explains why an oil rig fund structure in a Regulation D private placement requires separating dri</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ba2794d3/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finder’s Fees in Regulation D Private Placements: Who Needs the License?</title>
      <itunes:title>Finder’s Fees in Regulation D Private Placements: Who Needs the License?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c8d8f5f-0dda-4624-b078-2c76b2f1ac53</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a1d8ae1d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we address a common sponsor question: do you need a license to pay finder’s fees for investor introductions? The reality is that there is no payer’s license. Instead, the focus is on whether the recipient of transaction-based compensation is properly registered. Tilden explains how success-based pay in a Regulation D private placement may raise broker-dealer registration issues, why a real estate license is not a substitute, and the steps to verify registered placement agents before any money changes hands.</p><p>Also see: No License to Pay Finder’s Fees in a Reg D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>=Short legal field notes from syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti for sponsors raising capital through Regulation D offerings, private placements, syndications, and investment funds. In this episode, we address a common sponsor question: do you need a license to pay finder’s fees for investor introductions? The reality is that there is no payer’s license. Instead, the focus is on whether the recipient of transaction-based compensation is properly registered. Tilden explains how success-based pay in a Regulation D private placement may raise broker-dealer registration issues, why a real estate license is not a substitute, and the steps to verify registered placement agents before any money changes hands.</p><p>Also see: No License to Pay Finder’s Fees in a Reg D Offering at https://www.moschettilaw.com/finder-fees-reg-d</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 18:09:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tilden Moschetti</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a1d8ae1d/e7a212f5.mp3" length="7818388" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Tilden Moschetti</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>489</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why paying finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D private placement can move a capital raise into broker-dealer registration territory.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this field note, syndication attorney Tilden Moschetti explains why paying finder’s fees for investor introductions in a Regulation D private placement can move a capital raise into broker-dealer registration territory.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>syndication attorney, Regulation D attorney, securities attorney, private placement attorney, real estate syndication, investment fund attorney, private capital raise, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), private placement memorandum, PPM attorney, operating agreement, subscription agreement, accredited investors, fund formation, syndication structure, securities compliance, sponsor legal issues, raising money from investors, Tilden Moschetti</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a1d8ae1d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
