In this episode of Scream Creeps, the hosts delve into the cult classic vampire film Fright Night, exploring its unique blend of horror and humor, memorable characters, and lasting impact on the genre. They discuss the film's practical effects, character dynamics, and the cultural significance of its themes, while also sharing behind-the-scenes insights and personal anecdotes related to the movie. The conversation highlights why Fright Night remains a beloved staple in horror cinema, setting the stage for future episodes focused on other iconic horror films.

Takeaways

Fright Night blends horror with humor and nostalgia.
Chris Sarandon's portrayal of Jerry Dandridge is iconic.
Roddy McDowall's character is a love letter to horror fans.
The practical effects in Fright Night are still impressive today.
The film opened doors for future horror comedies.
Fright Night's themes include belief and courage.
The movie's atmosphere and soundtrack enhance its charm.
Evil Ed is a standout character with a memorable arc.
The film's legacy influenced many later vampire stories.
Fright Night remains a beloved classic for horror enthusiasts.

Sound bites

"The attention to detail was great."
"Vampires are inherently clean."
"Evil's alive!"

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Fright Night
01:23 The Characters and Their Dynamics
04:23 Practical Effects and Their Impact
05:34 Cultural Impact and Legacy of Fright Night
11:30 Behind the Scenes and Production Details
18:10 Character Analysis and Performances
24:10 Final Thoughts and Future Episodes

In this episode of Scream Creeps, the hosts delve into George A. Romero's iconic film, Night of the Living Dead. They explore its groundbreaking impact on the horror genre, the making of the film, and its cultural significance. The conversation covers character dynamics, the evolution of zombie tropes, and the film's dark ending. The hosts also discuss the film's legacy, its influence on future horror films, and the production techniques that made it a classic. As part of their 31 days of Halloween marathon, they set the stage for upcoming episodes focused on various horror themes.

Takeaways

Night of the Living Dead raised the zombie genre from the grave.
The film's shocking ending left a lasting impact on audiences.
Romero's guerrilla filmmaking techniques were revolutionary for the time.
The film's cultural significance is often discussed in the context of race.
Ben's character was groundbreaking as a black lead in horror.
The film's budget was remarkably low for its success.
The evolution of zombie tropes can be traced back to this film.
The ending of the film is notably darker than many remakes.
The film is preserved in the Library of Congress for its cultural importance.
The conversation sets the stage for a month of horror-themed discussions.

Sound bites

"It was one of a kind back then."
"The ending is way more fucked up."
"It's in the public domain."

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Night of the Living Dead
02:35 The Making of a Horror Classic
07:30 Cultural Impact and Legacy
12:09 Character Dynamics and Themes
18:52 Music and Production Techniques
22:04 The Evolution of Horror Tropes
23:50 Character Development and Survival Themes
27:12 The Mystery of the Outbreak
30:47 Cultural Significance and Social Commentary
33:56 The Dark Ending and Its Impact
39:39 Comparing Horror Then and Now

Takeaways

• Terrifier 3 continues the brutal legacy of Art the Clown.
• The film's budget was $2 million, with significant box office returns.
• Art the Clown is becoming a recognized horror icon.
• The supernatural elements add depth to the character dynamics.
• Humor is interwoven with horror in this installment.
• Memorable kill scenes are a hallmark of the Terrifier series.
• The film's campiness sets it apart from its predecessors.
• Character development is more pronounced in this film.
• The franchise's success paves the way for future installments.
• The hosts enjoyed the absurdity and humor in the film. Art the Clown has become a new iconic villain in horror.
• The blend of humor in horror films can enhance the viewing experience.
• The Terrifier franchise has evolved significantly with each installment.
• Future films in the franchise may explore new character dynamics.
• The character of Sienna may face challenges in future plots.
• Art the Clown's demon aspect adds depth to his character.
• The humor in horror can be reminiscent of classic characters like the Joker.
• The conversation highlights the importance of character development in horror films.
• Upcoming horror films are highly anticipated by fans.
• The podcast aims to keep the audience engaged with fresh content.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Terrifier 3

01:40 Plot Overview and Character Dynamics

03:47 Box Office Success and Franchise Impact

05:59 Art the Clown: A Horror Icon

08:48 Supernatural Elements and Character Development

12:01 Memorable Kill Scenes and Humor

17:04 Comparative Analysis of Terrifier Films

21:12 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

23:00 Exploring Horror Movie Characters

25:57 The Evolution of Art the Clown

28:57 The Future of the Terrifier Franchise

31:58 Humor in Horror: A Unique Blend

35:05 Comparing Iconic Horror Villains

38:59 Upcoming Horror Films and Future Discussions

Takeaways

• The Babadook explores the themes of parenting, grief, and the fear of madness.
• The hosts question the placement of The Babadook as the eighth scariest movie of 2020.
• They find the child character annoying and the movie lacking in scares.
• The acting performances and cinematography are praised.
• The hosts feel that The Babadook did not live up to its hype. The Babadook can be interpreted as a metaphor for the protagonist's battle with depression and grief.
• The movie explores psychological themes and requires viewers to think and interpret its meaning.
• The hosts found the movie slow and lacking in scares.
• Future episodes will feature reviews of 'A Quiet Place 2' and 'It Follows'.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to The Babadook

06:47 The Babadook as a Cult Classic

13:54 Lack of Scares in The Babadook

25:03 Disappointment with the Lack of Scares

29:57 Upcoming Reviews: 'A Quiet Place 2' and 'It Follows'

Takeaways

• The Descent is a 2005 horror film that creates a terrifying atmosphere and intense survival story.
• The director, Neil Marshall, and the cast of relatively unknown actors contribute to the film's success.
• The claustrophobic setting and the use of sound create a sense of fear and tension.
• The alternate ending of the film and the controversy surrounding the character Juno add to the discussion.
• 'The Descent' is considered one of the standout horror films of the 2000s. The opening scene of 'The Descent' sets the tone and shocks the audience, immediately creating empathy for the main character.
• Sarah's character development throughout the movie, especially after the blood scene, makes her a badass and a compelling protagonist.
• The decision-making of the characters, particularly Juno, raises questions about morality and survival instincts.
• The movie is considered more of an action flick than a traditional horror movie, with the darkness and claustrophobic setting adding to the suspense.
• The heart rate study ranked 'The Descent' as one of the scariest movies, with a high heart rate spike during a shocking scene.
• The potential for a sequel is explored, with the second movie following the events of the first and focusing on the search for the missing friends.
• The hosts discuss their upcoming episodes and content on their channel, including music reviews and let's plays.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to 'The Descent'

09:41 The Claustrophobic Setting and Intense Atmosphere

25:24 Sarah's Character Development

32:42 Questioning Morality and Survival Instincts

41:23 The Potential for a Sequel

Takeaways

• The Visit is a 2015 horror film directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
• The movie received positive reviews and was considered a return to form for Shyamalan.
• The accurate depiction of insanity and creepy moments were highlights of the film.
• There were some plot holes and unrealistic actions in the movie.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction

00:41 Background of the Movie

02:21 Initial Impressions

03:16 M. Night Shyamalan's Career

04:22 Funding the Movie

05:03 Accurate Depiction of Insanity

06:13 Mystery and Reveals

07:14 Creepy Moments

08:28 Plot Holes

09:16 Realistic Reactions

10:26 Parental Precautions

11:12 Unanswered Questions

12:00 Real-Life Scenario

13:06 Favorite Moments

14:42 Unrealistic Actions

15:33 Mixed Reviews

17:07 Mixed Reception for 'The Last Airbender' and 'After Earth'

18:00 Adapting Previous Works

18:38 Mark Wahlberg's Acting Style

19:56 Mark Wahlberg's Diverse Roles

20:24 Other Films by M. Night Shyamalan

22:23 M. Night Shyamalan's Return to Success

25:41 Unique Features of 'The Visit'

26:57 Olivia DeJonge's Role in 'The Visit'

28:01 Inconsistencies in Heart Rate Results

30:17 Upcoming Movies in the Series

Takeaways

• The Ring is a highly regarded horror film known for its atmospheric and visual qualities.
• The movie's realistic portrayal of the protagonist's investigative process adds to its appeal.
• The production of The Ring involved challenges, such as filming without a completed script.
• Personal preferences for favorite movies can vary based on individual experiences and emotional connections.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to The Ring

03:13 Reception and Influence

08:52 Discussion of the Film

20:59 Heart Rate Statistics

26:30 Personal Favorites and Emotional Impact

28:17 Upcoming Episode: The Visit

Takeaways

A Quiet Place is a spine-chilling movie known for its sound design, suspense, and emotional depth.

Emily Blunt delivers an outstanding performance in the film.

The movie effectively creates tension and realism, making it a must-watch for horror fans.

Heart rate can increase significantly during intense scenes in horror movies.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to A Quiet Place

01:00 What Makes A Quiet Place Spine-Chilling

02:19 Background and Production of A Quiet Place

04:32 Premiere and Success of A Quiet Place

05:59 Sequels and Spin-Offs

06:22 Personal Thoughts on A Quiet Place

08:08 Emily Blunt's Performance

09:03 Intense Scenes and Realism

10:33 Heart Rate and Suspense

18:08 Watching A Quiet Place 2

21:34 Next Episode: The Ring

23:02 Closing Remarks

Takeaways

Nightmare on Elm Street had a significant impact on the horror genre and is considered one of the greatest horror films ever made.

Freddy Krueger is a memorable and terrifying villain, known for his ability to attack people in their dreams.

The film's unique concept and practical effects, such as Freddy's glove, contributed to its success.

Nightmare on Elm Street spawned a franchise with multiple sequels and spin-offs.

The film's development was influenced by real-life events and Wes Craven's personal experiences.

The choice of Robert Englund as Freddy Krueger was a pivotal casting decision. The popularity of 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' is compared to the previous episode on Halloween.

The hosts announce that the next movie they will be discussing is 'The Quiet Place'.

Viewers are encouraged to subscribe, like, and engage with the channel's content.

Upcoming content and potential watch parties on Twitch are mentioned.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Nightmare on Elm Street

01:34 Background and Production

03:13 Influence and Impact

06:23 Personal Experiences and Favorite Moments

11:11 The Fear of Freddy Krueger

15:03 Comparisons to Other Films in the Franchise

17:22 Plot Holes and Lame Ending

23:16 Development and Writing

26:01 Choice of Freddy Krueger as the Villain

28:08 Studio Selection and Casting

31:36 Filming and Heart Rate Statistics

32:11 Comparison to Previous Episode

32:53 Next Week's Movie

34:03 Promoting the Channel

34:48 Upcoming Content

35:14 Closing Remarks

Takeaways

Halloween is a highly influential horror film that set the standard for the slasher genre.

Jamie Lee Curtis's performance as Laurie Strode solidified her as a scream queen.

The lack of explanation for Michael Myers' actions adds to the mystery and appeal of the character.

The iconic Halloween theme and suspenseful atmosphere contribute to the film's lasting impact.

The movie's slow build-up of tension and the absence of parents create a sense of unease and vulnerability.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Halloween

01:00 The Impact of Halloween

01:58 Exploring the Themes of Halloween

03:05 Background and Success of Halloween

04:16 The Influence of Halloween on the Horror Genre

05:37 The Halloween Franchise

06:04 Interesting Facts about Halloween

07:08 The Performance of Jamie Lee Curtis

08:09 Comparison to Previous Horror Movies

09:20 Unanswered Questions in Halloween

10:15 The Absence of Parents in Halloween

13:08 The Scream Queen Legacy

14:38 The Impact of Jamie Lee Curtis

15:27 The Progression of Horror Icons

16:11 The Slow Build-up of Suspense in Halloween

19:23 The Lack of Explanation for Michael Myers' Actions

20:07 The Evolution of Michael Myers' Killing Spree

23:14 The Absence of Parents in Halloween

24:45 The Heart Rate Analysis of Halloween

25:17 Critiques of Halloween

27:07 The Mystery and Appeal of Michael Myers

29:01 The Influence of Halloween on Pop Culture

30:29 The Iconic Halloween Theme

33:02 The Progression of John Carpenter's Filmmaking

35:26 Upcoming Content from The Heart of Geek

Takeaways

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre is a classic horror film that has had a significant impact on the slasher genre.

The movie is often hyped up, but it may not live up to expectations, especially for viewers who have seen more recent horror films.

The characters in the film are generally unlikable, and the lack of tension and suspense can be disappointing.

Despite its flaws, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre is considered a revolutionary film that paved the way for future horror movies.

Upcoming episodes will cover Halloween and A Nightmare on Elm Street.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Horror Cinema

01:36 Initial Thoughts on the Film

03:02 Plot and Historical Context

04:51 Influence on the Slasher Genre

05:22 Disappointment with the Film

07:06 Expectations for Remakes and Sequels

09:02 Unlikable Characters

10:08 Lack of Tension and Suspense

11:26 Misconceptions about the Film

13:36 Heart Rate Study Results

14:51 Low Budget and Practical Effects

16:17 Impact on the Horror Genre

19:45 Hype and Expectations

23:12 Family Dynamic and Weirdness

25:05 Revolutionary but Not a Good Movie

27:01 Upcoming Episodes

29:09 Upcoming Releases and Recommendations

30:23 Engaging with the Audience

30:51 Closing Remarks

In this episode of Scream Creeps, the hosts discuss the 2002 horror film 28 Days Later. They introduce the podcast and the movie, highlighting its ranking as the 16th scariest movie according to science. The hosts share their thoughts on the film, including its realistic portrayal of survival and human nature. They discuss the filming and release of the movie, as well as the alternative endings. The hosts also mention the heart rate study conducted on viewers of the film. They conclude with their favorite scenes and recommendations for watching the movie.

Takeaways

28 Days Later is a 2002 horror film that ranks as the 16th scariest movie according to science.

The film is praised for its realistic portrayal of survival and human nature in a post-apocalyptic world.

Alternative endings were filmed, but the cinematic release included a happy ending.

The movie had a successful box office run, grossing $84.6 million on a budget of $8 million.

Viewers' heart rates increased while watching the film, with the highest spike reaching 95 beats per minute.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Scream Creeps

00:45 Introducing 28 Days Later

02:27 Initial Reactions and Cast

03:47 Filming and Release

04:30 Box Office Success

05:37 Influences and Filming Techniques

06:44 Alternative Endings

07:01 Ratings and Heart Rate Study

09:01 Josh's Thoughts on the Film

09:32 Aaron's Thoughts on the Film

11:00 Realistic Reactions and Human Nature

12:30 Box Office Comparison

13:00 Jeremy's First-Time Viewing Experience

14:29 Availability and Viewing Experience

15:58 Discussion on Alternative Endings

17:38 Josh's Favorite Scene

18:17 Aaron's Favorite Scene

21:14 Is 28 Days Later a Scary Movie?

23:41 Final Thoughts and Recommendations

27:01 Upcoming Episodes and Conclusion

Takeaways

• The Exorcist is considered one of the scariest films of all time, ranking 17th according to science.
• Previous viewings of horror movies can impact the scare factor, as familiarity with the genre and its tropes can diminish the fear.
• The Exorcist was a groundbreaking film that pushed boundaries and shocked audiences, leading to mixed reviews and controversy.
• The film's creepy and disturbing scenes, along with its themes of religion and faith, have left a lasting impact on the horror genre.
• The Exorcist is preserved as a historically significant film, recognized for its cultural and artistic value.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to The Exorcist

01:51 The Science Behind the Ranking

03:06 The Impact of Previous Viewings

04:28 Character Development vs. Horror

05:44 The Cast and Production

07:14 Mixed Reviews and Controversy

10:44 The Creepy and Disturbing Scenes

13:42 Reception and Legacy

18:07 Themes and Symbolism

21:35 Religion and Faith

23:38 Upcoming Horror Movies

27:27 Preservation of The Exorcist

29:44 Discussion about the Exorcist movie

31:25 Different expectations for horror movies

32:23 Personal experiences with horror movies

33:31 The use of audio in horror movies

34:14 Upcoming movies to be discussed

35:07 Promotion of other content and conclusion

Takeaways

• Hush is a psychological thriller directed by Mike Flanagan and stars Kate Siegel.
• The movie's scare factor is based on its relatability and the tension it builds.
• The antagonist's character could have been more menacing and the plot could have had more suspenseful moments.
• Hush was released on Netflix and has since been removed from streaming platforms.
• The podcast will be released on Fridays from now on. Themed bedding and lighting can help create a unique and personalized bedroom space.
• Displaying hobby-related items, such as Lego models, can add a personal touch to the room.
• Closing remarks and previews of upcoming content can be a good way to engage with the audience.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to the podcast and movie

01:15 Overview of the movie Hush

03:06 Release and availability of the movie

04:15 Remakes and adaptations of Hush

05:09 Discussion on the scare factor and relatability

08:03 Comparison to other horror movies

11:03 Analysis of the antagonist's character

13:53 Discussion on character decisions and plot progression

15:19 Critique of the antagonist's actions

17:08 Tension-building opportunities in the movie

20:00 Comparison of the movie's scare factor to other films

21:16 Heart rate analysis of Hush

22:21 Discussion on Kate Siegel's other works

23:08 Director Mike Flanagan's filmography

26:41 Distribution and availability of Hush

28:09 Change in podcast release schedule

28:45 Upcoming episodes on the scariest movies list

30:12 Bedroom Theme

30:37 Decorations and Models

31:08 Closing Remarks

Takeaways

• The film 'It' is a popular horror movie that has had a significant impact on the genre.
• The influence of 'Stranger Things' can be seen in 'It', particularly in the portrayal of a group of kids facing a supernatural threat.
• Bill Skarsgard's performance as Pennywise is highly praised for its creepiness and effectiveness.
• The film's development and the director's other works provide interesting context for understanding 'It'.
• The film includes both creepy and disturbing scenes, with the blood scene being a standout moment.
• The final battle in the film emphasizes the theme of overcoming fear.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to the Film 'It'

00:57 Unraveling the Mysteries of Derry, Maine

02:08 Thoughts on the Film and Its Ranking

03:00 The Influence of Stranger Things

04:55 Director and Cast of 'It'

06:12 Bill Skarsgard's Portrayal of Pennywise

08:58 The Impact of Horror Movies

11:11 Comparisons to the Original 'It'

13:11 Andy Muschietti's Other Works

15:33 Development of the Film

17:19 Creepy and Disturbing Scenes

20:32 Interpreting the Blood Scene

23:48 Favorite Scenes and Over-the-Top Moments

27:12 The Final Battle and Overcoming Fear

Takeaways

• Scream is ranked as the 20th scariest film ever made.
• The film satirizes slasher film clichés and brings a refreshing take to the genre.
• Scream's twist ending and meta humor have contributed to its lasting legacy.
• The performances of Matthew Lillard and Skeet Ulrich are highlights of the film.
• Scream is recommended for both horror fans and newcomers to the genre.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Scream and its Ranking

02:02 Background and Plot of Scream

03:11 Development and Release of Scream

04:07 Reception and Legacy of Scream

05:31 Personal Thoughts on Scream

07:38 Heart Rate Statistics and Comparison

09:02 Meta Humor and Subversion of Horror Tropes

10:18 Matthew Lillard's Performance and Character

11:06 Comparison to Nightmare on Elm Street

12:11 Acting Careers of Skeet Ulrich and Matthew Lillard

13:27 Scary Movie Ranking and Anticipation

16:19 Twist Ending and Future of the Franchise

17:00 Speculation on the Survival of the Killers

19:14 Refreshing Elements of Scream

20:37 Lack of Anticipatory Moments in Slasher Films

22:57 Jump Scares and Ending Scene

26:24 Availability and Recommendation

29:16 Upcoming Theater Junkies Podcast

30:16 Other Content on the Channel

31:10 Conclusion and Farewell

Takeaways

• The film adaptation of Five Nights at Freddy's received negative reviews for its lack of scares and perceived shoehorning of fan service.
• The movie was a box office success, grossing over $149 million as of November 1st.
• The film's budget was primarily allocated to the creation of the animatronic puppets, which were designed by Jim Henson Studios.
• The movie aimed to appeal to the fan base of the game, which primarily consists of younger audiences.
• The hosts discuss the potential shift in the movie industry towards streaming and the impact on traditional movie theaters.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

00:56 Film Production

02:41 Release and Reception

03:41 Scare Factor and Target Audience

05:27 Parental Guidance

07:13 Cinematography and Budget

09:08 Notable Cast Members

11:02 Inspiration from Chuck E. Cheese

13:07 Rating and Brutality

17:21 Storyline and Characters

20:00 Impact of the Five Nights at Freddy's Game

21:48 Budget Allocation

23:24 Involvement of YouTubers

25:34 Shift to Streaming and Box Office Success

26:03 Future of Movie Theaters

The discussion highlights the film's confusing non-linear storytelling, with the hosts admitting they struggled to piece together the plot—specifically the connection between the "meowing" boy, Toshio, and the murdered cat—until the halfway point. While they agree the movie isn't terrifying by modern standards (noting a low heart rate increase of only 6 BPM), they praise the iconic sound design of the "death rattle" and the creepy visuals of Kayako. Key scenes discussed include the jawless girl on the stairs, the shower hand scene, and the hanging body sequence. The episode wraps up with a look ahead to their highly anticipated review of Five Nights at Freddy's.

Key Highlights
[00:28] Halloween Costumes: The hosts show off their costumes: Jeremy as a Slytherin student, Aaron as Peter Parker, and Josh as Nacho Libre (complete with "nipple-proof" shirt).
[01:17] Production & Reception: A breakdown of the film's massive box office success ($187 million on a $10 million budget) despite mixed critical reviews.
[05:37] The Cat Boy Confusion: The crew discusses their confusion over Toshio, the boy who meows like a cat, and the eventual reveal of the father's murder spree involving the family pet.
[10:29] The Death Rattle: A conversation on the film's most effective scare tactic: the croaking/gargling sound made by the ghost, which Josh admits to mimicking to scare people in real life.
[13:19] The Jawless Girl: The team reacts to the shocking practical effect of the girl with the missing jaw, agreeing it was one of the few genuinely "cool" visual moments.
[15:36] Science of Scare Stats: Jeremy reveals the heart rate data: a resting BPM of 65 and a movie average of 71, proving the film wasn't physically stressing the test subjects very much.

Takeaways

• The Witch is a movie that lacks traditional horror elements and may not meet the expectations of viewers looking for a scary experience.
• The acting performances in the movie are praised, particularly the performance of Harvey Scrimshaw as Caleb.
• The movie features some trippy and creepy scenes, but overall, it is more of a slow-paced period drama than a horror flick.
• The movie's ranking on the list is questioned, as it may not deserve its placement among other horror films.
• Heart rate statistics show that the movie did not elicit significant increases in heart rate, indicating a lack of fear or suspense.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Movie Overview

02:24 Expectations and Disappointments

03:23 Lack of Horror Elements

04:02 Strong Acting Performances

05:36 Trippy and Creepy Scenes

08:01 Discussion on Accents and Setting

09:22 Predictability of the Ending

11:31 Persecution of the Protagonist

13:00 Limited Horror Elements and Slow Pace

15:38 Inconsistencies in the Movie Ranking

18:21 Discussion on Replacing Movies on the List

19:57 Heart Rate Statistics and Movie Rankings

24:07 Upcoming Movies on the List

26:07 Final Thoughts on the Movie

The discussion centers on the film's unique blend of 80s slasher tropes and time travel mechanics, often described as Back to the Future meets Scream. The hosts appreciate the nostalgic elements, from the lack of DNA testing (the "DMA machine" joke) to the "stranger danger" parenting style of the 80s. They praise Kiernan Shipka's performance as Jamie, the Gen Z protagonist who travels back to 1987 to stop the "Sweet 16 Killer," and the chemistry with Olivia Holt as her teenage mom. While they agree it's not a "black comedy" as marketed, but rather a fun, lighthearted slasher, they highlight the clever writing that juxtaposes modern sensibilities with 80s culture.

Key Highlights
[00:48] The Premise: Introduction to Totally Killer, directed by Nahnatchka Khan and produced by Blumhouse, starring Kiernan Shipka and Julie Bowen.
[05:17] Black Comedy or Just Fun?: Josh debates the "black comedy" label, arguing it's more of a lighthearted slasher than a dark, gritty comedy like Fargo.
[08:05] 80s Nostalgia: The crew discusses the accurate (and hilarious) depiction of the 80s, including the lack of safety concerns, the "dirt weed," and the fashion.
[13:13] The "DMA" Joke: A highlight of the funniest scene involving Randall Park's character dismissing the concept of DNA evidence, throwing the sample in the trash.
[22:06] Kiernan Shipka: Jeremy shares trivia about the lead actress, noting she started her career as a baby on ER and grew up on Mad Men before Chilling Adventures of Sabrina.
[24:42] The "VV" Connection: Josh points out a weird recurring theme in Adam Sandler-produced movies (though this isn't one) where female leads often have "V.V." initials, sparking a tangent on Julie Bowen's past roles.

Takeaways

• The Blair Witch Project was a low-budget, improvised horror film that became a sleeper hit and influenced the found footage genre.
• The film's marketing campaign, which listed the actors as missing or deceased, contributed to its success.
• The careers of the actors involved in the Blair Witch Project varied, with some experiencing backlash and limited opportunities.
• The film's plot and structure received mixed reviews, with some viewers finding it lacking in scares and plot development.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background of Blair Witch Project

01:20 Production and Release of Blair Witch Project

03:20 Success and Impact of Blair Witch Project

05:20 Actors' Careers and Controversies

06:46 Discussion on the Film's Structure

09:16 Marketing and Reception of Blair Witch Project

11:41 Influence on Found Footage Genre

14:14 Evaluation of Acting and Plot

15:08 Impact of Marketing and Realism

16:52 Financial Success of Blair Witch Project

18:20 Sequels and Franchise

20:44 Comparison to Other Horror Films

22:13 Symbolism and References in Blair Witch Project

23:58 Connection to The Crucible and Salem Witch Trials

25:11 Improvisation and Filming Process

27:22 Role of Joshua Leonard and Other Actors

28:58 Discussion on Updated Scariest Movies List

34:21 Methodology of Scariest Movies List

35:45 Next Movies in the Scariest Movies List

38:32 Conclusion and Future Episodes

Takeaways

• The Exorcist Believer is the sixth installment in the Exorcist franchise and serves as a sequel to the original film.
• The movie received negative reviews from critics who felt it failed to reach the height and impact of the original film.
• The film explores themes of faith and religion, particularly the importance of belief in exorcisms.
• The hosts recommend waiting to watch the movie on streaming platforms rather than going to the theater.
• Upcoming episodes will cover the Blair Witch Project and Totally Killer.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

00:59 Overview of the Movie

02:22 Production and Release

03:24 Cast and Characters

04:19 Budget and Box Office Performance

08:46 Opinions and Recommendations

10:28 Discussion on Fandom and Theater Subscriptions

15:51 Predictability of the Movie

18:01 Exploration of Faith and Religion

22:13 Act One Analysis

25:32 Tie-In to Catholicism

28:13 Comparison of Different Lists of Scariest Movies

31:27 Upcoming Episodes and Closing Remarks

The discussion highlights the film's incredible practical effects (designed by H.R. Giger), noting how well the sets and the Xenomorph hold up over 40 years later despite a budget of only $11 million. They break down the iconic "chestburster" scene involving John Hurt, which remains one of the most shocking moments in cinema history. The hosts also praise Sigourney Weaver's groundbreaking performance as Ripley, the tension-filled pacing, and the reveal that Ash (Ian Holm) was an android all along. The episode wraps up with a debate on the best film in the franchise, with the group split between Alien, Aliens, and even Alien: Covenant.

Key Highlights
[00:14] Science of Scare #24: The hosts introduce Alien as the 24th scariest movie according to science, noting its immense influence on sci-fi and horror.
[06:23] The Chestburster Scene: A deep dive into the legendary scene where the alien bursts out of Kane's chest, which the crew agrees is still anxiety-inducing today.
[07:45] Practical Effects vs. Budget: The team marvels at the quality of the sets and creature effects achieved with an $11 million budget in 1979, comparing it favorably to modern CGI.
[15:04] The Egg Chamber: A discussion on the creepy translucency of the alien eggs and the "facehugger" attack, highlighting the brilliant design work.
[36:02] The Jump Scare: Josh shares his favorite scare involving Dallas in the air ducts, where the alien suddenly appears from the darkness with just a reach of its hand.
[39:15] The Android Twist: The crew reacts to the shocking reveal that Ash was an android sent to ensure the alien's survival at the expense of the crew.

Takeaways

• The movie 'No One Will Save You' is unique in its lack of dialogue, relying on visual storytelling to convey the narrative.
• The film's director, Brian Duffield, is known for his work in the horror and science fiction genres.
• The movie explores intellectual themes and leaves room for interpretation, making it a thought-provoking viewing experience.
• Childhood movie experiences can have a lasting impact on one's love for movies and storytelling. Childhood dreams and nightmares can have a lasting impact on our memories.
• Certain horror movies from our childhood can still scare us as adults.
• Watching horror movies together can create lasting memories and bonding experiences.
• Planning future movie discussions can be exciting and engaging.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Change of Movie

01:00 Movie Background and Lack of Dialogue

02:11 Director and Cast

03:00 Viewer Experience and Emotional Impact

04:08 The Blacklist and Film Success

05:25 Act Structure and Storytelling

06:24 Alien Design and Intellectual Themes

07:31 Realistic Alien Invasion

08:20 Investment in Characters

09:03 Ending and Interpretation

10:25 Movie Budget and Effects

11:54 Short Act One and Act Two

13:53 Intellectual Nature of the Film

14:49 Audience Reactions and Interpretation

15:38 Recommendation and Accessibility

16:56 Alien Design and Storytelling

18:48 Childhood Movie Experiences

19:48 Lack of Dialogue and Supporting Characters

20:33 Director's Previous Work

22:26 Childhood Movie Rental Experiences

23:53 Family Background and Love for Movies

26:43 Impact of Childhood Movie Experiences

28:59 Movies that Scared Them as Kids

30:57 Childhood Dreams and Nightmares

34:35 The Movie 'Ticks'

39:05 Horror Movies and Childhood Memories

41:33 Future Movie Plans

43:42 Closing Remarks

Takeaways

• Combining different influences and personal experiences can result in a unique and authentic filmmaking style.
• Filming during the COVID-19 pandemic presented numerous challenges, but with strict safety measures and a dedicated team, it was possible to complete the project.
• Being both the lead actress and director requires balancing different roles and responsibilities, but creating a supportive and collaborative environment is crucial.
• Filmmaking is a constant learning process, and even without formal training, passion and dedication can lead to successful projects.
• Indie filmmaking involves not only creating the film but also navigating the challenges of distribution and getting the movie seen by a wider audience.
• Consistency and perseverance are key for aspiring filmmakers, as every day should be dedicated to working towards their goals.
• The message of 'Heir of the Witch' is that our actions have consequences, and there is always a battle between good and bad in the world.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Movie Screening

01:18 Film Inspiration and Style

03:21 Choosing Horror Genre and Personal Story

06:19 Challenges of Filming During COVID-19

07:07 Challenges of Being Lead Actress and Director

09:21 Switching Roles and Leading the Team

13:42 Favorite and Most Difficult Scenes to Shoot

18:21 Indie Filmmaking and Distribution Challenges

20:07 Future Plans as a Filmmaker

23:05 Advice for Aspiring Filmmakers

25:33 Message for Viewers and Movie Availability

28:21 Conclusion and Farewell

Takeaways

• Saw X is the tenth installment in the Saw film series and serves as both a direct sequel to the first Saw movie and a prequel to Saw 2.
• The film received mostly positive reviews, with praise for Tobin Bell's performance.
• The hosts appreciated the character development in the first act of the film, which provided insight into Jigsaw's motivations.
• There were some logical flaws in the timeline of the film, but the hosts acknowledged that such flaws are common in horror movies. The transition from Act 1 to Act 2 occurs when the main character, Henry, realizes he has been conned.
• The kills and traps in Saw V are gruesome and involve time limits for the victims to complete their tasks.
• The hosts question the reasoning behind some of the punishments, particularly in the case of Gabriella.
• The final trap and climax of the movie are intense and involve a teeter-totter mechanism.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Spoiler Warning

01:21 Background of Saw X

02:16 Director and Writer Information

03:22 Cast and Characters

05:16 Personal Connections to the Cast

07:13 Film Production and Release

08:41 Positive Reception and Tobin Bell's Performance

10:35 Overall Impressions and Favorite Installment

11:39 Comparison to Dexter

13:22 Opening Scene and Jigsaw's Mindset

14:27 Trap with the Custodian

15:30 Support Group and Jigsaw's Motivations

19:24 Character Development in the First Act

21:53 Logical Flaws in the Timeline

26:10 Introduction and Act 1

27:36 Transition to Act 2

30:24 First Kill: Diego

34:09 Second Kill: Valentina

35:07 Third Kill: Mateo

39:05 Fourth Kill: Gabriella

43:36 Transition to Act 3

51:01 Final Trap and Climax

52:59 Foreshadowing and Unexpected Twists

55:51 The Final Trap

56:12 Flaws in the Game

58:03 The Mid-Credit Scene

01:00:12 John and Mark Hoffman

01:01:53 The Impact of Taylor Swift

01:03:49 Upcoming Episodes

01:07:34 Conclusion

Takeaways

• The movie features memorable kill scenes, with unexpected twists and impressive special effects.
• The death of Windows is considered one of the worst in the movie due to his inaction and missed opportunities to defend himself.
• Theories about Childs being a thing or not are inconclusive, but the ending suggests that both MacReady and Childs may have sacrificed themselves to prevent the spread of the alien.
• The special effects in the movie were praised, and the discussion highlights the work of the special effects artist and his collaborations with John Carpenter.
• The casting choices, particularly Kurt Russell as MacReady, were well-received, and other actors considered for roles include Christopher Walken, Jeff Bridges, and Nick Nolte. The hosts have a nostalgic appreciation for the movie 'The Thing' due to its combination of sci-fi and horror.
• The podcast will feature an interview with a director, star, and writer in an upcoming episode.
• The hosts express their excitement for future episodes and the opportunity to discuss new movies.
• The next episode will focus on 'Saw X', and the hosts anticipate discussing the death scenes and torture porn elements of the film.

Chapters

00:00 Discussion of Favorite and Worst Kill Scenes

32:11 The Worst Death in the Movie

36:30 Theories about Childs and the Ending

39:29 Discussion of Special Effects and John Carpenter's Work

45:08 Casting Considerations and Kurt Russell's Role

49:01 Other Actors Considered for Roles

50:48 Discussion of the Movie

51:35 Upcoming Podcasts

52:23 Excitement for Future Episodes

53:04 Conclusion and Preview of Saw 10

Takeaways

• The appearance of the monsters in the movie was influenced by the low budget production.
• The ending of the movie was predictable.
• The hosts share their favorite movies to rewatch.
• The next movie discussion will be on The Thing.

Chapters

00:00 Lack of Connection with the Main Character

30:13 Cultural Differences and Americanization

34:42 The Importance of Family and Relationships

38:40 The Start of the Third Act

41:01 The Demon and the Power of Prayer

46:57 Worst Movies and Digressions

47:19 The Climax and Favorite Scenes

48:46 Technical Difficulties

49:35 The Appearance of the Monsters

50:18 Low Budget Production

52:16 Rescuing the Unconscious

52:49 The Peshosh

53:45 Predictable Ending

56:29 Comparison to Nightmare on Elm Street

57:13 Low Theater Attendance

59:48 Would You Watch It Again?

01:01:14 Favorite Movies to Rewatch

01:02:38 Next Movie Discussion: The Thing

01:04:41 Upcoming Movie Discussion: Saw 10

01:05:12 Closing Remarks

Takeaways

• The Nun 2 is a sequel to the 2018 film The Nun and is part of the Conjuring Universe franchise.
• The movie received mixed reviews from critics but was generally considered an improvement over its predecessor.
• The film features historical accuracy in its portrayal of St. Lucia and incorporates elements from real-life events.
• The hosts enjoyed the visual effects and scary moments in the movie and appreciated the overall storytelling.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Trailer

04:18 Background and Production

06:21 Initial Reactions and Expectations

10:45 Plot and Storytelling

19:17 Post-Credit Scene and Future of the Franchise

23:31 Visuals and Scary Moments

26:21 Overall Impressions and Conclusion

55:05 Revelation of the Location

55:15 Reflection on the Conversation

Chapters

00:00 Relating to the Characters

27:27 Consistency of Characters

28:22 Success of the Movie

29:17 Analyzing the Characters' Choices

30:51 Realism of the Movie

32:23 Discussion of Other Horror Movies

35:09 Recommendation to Watch Poltergeist

39:10 Upcoming Review of 'Heir of the Witch'

40:47 Closing Remarks

The conversation is dominated by the film's extreme gore, which the hosts agree far surpasses the original. They break down the most notorious moments, including the "bedroom scene" involving Allie, which was so brutal it reportedly caused theatergoers to vomit. Josh admits the movie was so gross he likely won't watch it again. However, they praise the practical effects and the performance of David Howard Thornton, noting that Art the Clown leans more into his "clown" persona this time around. They also discuss the introduction of the new final girl, Sienna Shaw, the supernatural elements surrounding Art's resurrection, and the bizarre mid-credits scene involving the first film's survivor, Victoria.

Key Highlights
[01:36] Box Office Miracle: The hosts discuss the massive financial success of the film and the announcement of Terrifier 3 with a bigger budget.
[05:41] The Laundromat Scene: A look at the bizarre and disturbing scene where a naked Art the Clown plays patty-cake with a supernatural entity.
[12:42] The Bedroom Scene: A deep dive into the movie's most infamous kill sequence involving Allie, featuring scalping, bleach, and bone-breaking that pushed the boundaries of the slasher genre.
[21:57] The Shotgun Kill: The crew reacts to the shocking moment Art uses a sawed-off shotgun to blow the mom's face off, subverting the expectation of a knife kill.
[25:43] Supernatural Elements: A discussion on the confusing lore, including Sienna's resurrection, the magical sword, and why Art targeted her family specifically.
[28:53] The Mid-Credits Scene: The hosts break down the grotesque ending where Victoria gives birth to Art the Clown's living head in a mental institution.

The discussion focuses on the film's gritty, low-budget aesthetic (reminiscent of 80s grindhouse cinema) and the terrifying silent performance of Art the Clown. Josh compares Art's silence to a mime, noting it makes him uniquely unsettling compared to other slashers like Freddy or even Jason. The hosts break down the film's lack of a deep plot—it's essentially a relentless night of killing—but praise the practical effects and gore. Specifically, they dissect the infamous "hacksaw scene," which Josh calls the goriest kill in the movie, where a character is sawed in half from the groin up. They also touch on the bizarre opening interview scene, the "dead cat" twist (wait, wrong movie—they reference a ring from a vending machine here), and the surreal ending where Art shoots himself but survives.

Key Highlights
[00:46] The Origin: Introduction to Terrifier, its low budget of $35,000, and director Damien Leone's background with the character in All Hallow's Eve.
[04:22] Silent Killer: A discussion on Art the Clown’s unique persona—he doesn't speak, grunt, or make noise, acting more like a deadly mime than a traditional slasher villain.
[06:42] The Aesthetic: The crew notes the film's gritty look, comparing it to old 80s/90s slashers with its film grain and practical effects.
[13:15] The Hacksaw Scene: A deep dive into the movie's most notorious kill—Dawn being sawed in half upside down—which the hosts agree is the highlight for gorehounds.
[16:24] The Scalping: Josh recounts the bizarre scene where Art wears the skin/breasts of a homeless woman to taunt the protagonist, highlighting the film's disturbing humor.
[19:06] The Gun Twist: The team laughs at the scene where Art, after a brutal physical fight, simply pulls out a gun and shoots the final girl, subverting slasher expectations.

The discussion centers on the film's effective use of sound design and cinematography to create a constant sense of dread. Josh highlights the "party chat" viewing experience where the audio immersion made the jump scares even more effective. They break down the central metaphor of trauma passing from person to person, the terrifying visual of the "smile," and the gruesome ending that didn't pull any punches. Key scenes discussed include the birthday party "dead cat" reveal, the head-drop scene in the car, and the final creature reveal which terrified Elaine. They also touch on Sosie Bacon’s performance and how the film compares to other recent horror entries like Nope (which they didn't love).

Key Highlights
[01:05] The Setup: Introduction to Smile, directed by Parker Finn and starring Sosie Bacon (Kevin Bacon’s daughter), and its premise of a curse passed through witnessing suicide.
[02:14] The Creep Factor: The hosts agree this is the creepiest movie they've reviewed, citing the unnerving nature of a silent, smiling figure staring at you.
[08:43] The Jump Scares: A discussion on the effective jump scares, particularly the "head drop" scene with the sister at the car window, which got everyone.
[09:53] The Dead Cat: The crew reacts to the brutal birthday party scene where the main character gifts her nephew a dead cat, sealing the "trauma" metaphor.
[13:05] The Detective's Mistake: Josh criticizes the detective/ex-boyfriend for leaving the protagonist alone despite knowing the pattern of the curse.
[25:23] Creepo-Meter Ratings: A rare unanimous 10/10 on the "Creepo-Meter" for its genuine ability to unsettle the hosts, surpassing previous favorites like Sinister.

The conversation centers on Ethan Hawke’s chilling performance as "The Grabber," a serial killer who abducts a teenage boy named Finney. They analyze the unique supernatural element of the disconnected black phone in the basement, which allows Finney to communicate with the killer's previous victims. The hosts break down the clever ways Finney uses the ghosts' clues to plot his escape, the satisfying character arc of him finding his courage, and the standout performance of Madeleine McGraw as Finney's psychic sister, Gwen. They also touch on the film's 70s setting, the "stranger danger" vibes, and the brutal reality of the abuse depicted in the film.

Key Highlights
[00:46] Director & Cast: A look at Scott Derrickson's direction (known for Sinister and Doctor Strange) and the cast, including Ethan Hawke as the villain.
[04:22] The Grabber: A discussion on Ethan Hawke's character, his creepy masks, and the "naughty boy" games he plays with his victims. [07:08] The Supernatural Phone: The crew explains the premise of the disconnected phone and how the ghosts of past victims help Finney survive.
[07:58] Gwen's Role: Praise for the character of Gwen (the sister), her psychic visions, and her hilarious yet heartbreaking scene in the principal's office.
[19:14] The Escape: A breakdown of the climax, detailing how Finney uses every clue (the grate, the cable, the dirt) to trap and kill The Grabber. [28:24] Final Rating: The group gives the movie high marks (9/10), calling it one of the best horror films they've seen recently due to its tight pacing and lack of plot holes.

The conversation highlights the updated opening scene involving Jenna Ortega and a landline (in 2022?), the return of legacy characters Sidney, Gale, and Dewey, and the meta-commentary on "toxic fandom." Josh takes issue with the physics of a certain major death scene, arguing that a 100-pound teenager shouldn't be able to overpower a grown man like Dewey. The group also praises the suspenseful death of Dylan Minnette's character and debates whether the new killers, Richie and Amber, lived up to the legacy of Ghostface. They conclude by looking ahead to Scream 6 and the news of Neve Campbell's departure.

Key Highlights
[00:08] The Re-quel Begins: Introduction to Scream (2022) as a direct sequel to Scream 4 and a tribute to Wes Craven.
[02:00] The Landline Logic: The crew laughs at the opening scene where a Gen Z character answers a landline, debating if it's a believable trope in 2022.
[08:00] Predicting the Killers: Josh claims he pegged the killers (Richie and Amber) early on, noting the clues dropped throughout the film. [14:17] The Best Kill: A breakdown of the suspenseful death of Wes (Dylan Minnette), praising the tension building with the fridge door and the sudden execution.
[16:22] Dewey's Death: A heated discussion on the controversial decision to kill off Dewey, with Josh criticizing the realism of Amber overpowering him.
[20:37] Neve Campbell's Exit: The team discusses the news that Neve Campbell won't return for Scream 6 due to a pay dispute and what that means for the franchise.

The discussion explores the unique format of the film, which spends the first half in 1666 explaining the "witch" origin story before jumping back to 1994 for the final showdown. The team highlights the clever use of the same actors from previous films playing their ancestors (or "mirror" characters) in the 1666 timeline—such as Kiana Madeira as Sarah Fier and Ashley Zukerman as Solomon Goode. Major plot points discussed include the reveal that the Goode family was behind the curse all along (sacrificing Shady Siders to keep Sunnyvale prosperous) and the tragic, misunderstood nature of Sarah Fier. They also touch on the "open" ending with the book being snatched mid-credits.

Key Highlights
[00:52] The Structure: A breakdown of how the movie splits its runtime between the origin story in 1666 and the resolution in 1994.
[02:51] The Best of the Three: Josh argues this is the best film of the trilogy because it wraps up every plot thread and explains the "why" behind the killings.
[09:57] The True Villain Revealed: The group discusses the twist that Nick Goode (and his ancestor Solomon Goode) were the real villains, sacrificing innocent people to Satan to maintain power.
[19:14] RL Stine's Influence: A conversation on how the movie adapts the spirit of the Fear Street books—darker than Goosebumps but still aimed at a teen audience—while mixing in historical elements like the Salem Witch Trials.
[26:05] The "Mirror" Characters: Elaine points out the smart casting choice of having the actors from 1994 and 1978 play roles in 1666 that mirror their modern-day dynamics (e.g., Deena/Sam as Sarah/Hannah).
[31:54] Final Rating: The crew gives the trilogy high marks, with Josh rating it an 8 or 9 out of 10 for its inventive storytelling and cohesive plot.

The discussion focuses on the shift in tone from the 90s mall setting to the 70s Camp Nightwing. Josh and Elaine debate whether this entry surpasses the first, noting that while the kills felt slightly less "standout" than the bread slicer scene in 1994, the lore building was superior. They analyze the killers—specifically Tommy Slater (the axe-wielding, bag-head maniac)—and the tragic backstory of the Berman sisters, Ziggy and Cindy. The crew also touches on the unique release schedule, the "curse" of Sarah Fier, and how the film sets the stage for the final chapter, 1666.

Key Highlights
[01:01] Back to Camp: The hosts discuss the setting shift to 1978 and how it perfectly captures the Friday the 13th aesthetic with Camp Nightwing.
[06:03] The Killers: A breakdown of the villains, including Tommy Slater and the creepy "milkman" killer, and how the film introduces the concept of multiple killers from different eras.
[10:46] The Berman Sisters Twist: The group discusses the reveal that Ziggy is actually C. Berman (the survivor who calls Sam in the first movie) and the confusion over her "death" and revival.
[12:37] The Sheriff’s Secret: A look at Sheriff Nick Goode's role, his dismissal of the supernatural events, and the friction it causes with Ziggy. [21:21] The Mean Girl Trope: Josh laughs at the hypocrisy of the "stoner chick" character who bullies Cindy relentlessly but immediately begs for help once she gets injured. [26:50] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The team struggles to rate it high on the "Creepo-Meter" because, like many slashers, the kills are predictable if you know the genre.

The hosts praise the film for its 90s aesthetic, noting the spot-on soundtrack and mall setting (reminiscent of their own teenage years). Josh highlights the film's "world-building," appreciating how it sets up the curse of Sarah Fier and the history of Shady Side vs. Sunnyvale. The discussion inevitably turns to the gore, with the crew marveling at the shocking intensity of the kills—particularly the bread slicer scene—which far exceeded their expectations for a "teen" horror movie. They also touch on the unique release strategy of dropping three films back-to-back and debate the logic behind Sam's possession at the end.

Key Highlights
[00:46] Introducing the Trilogy: The hosts explain the Fear Street release format, with parts set in 1994, 1978, and 1666 released weekly on Netflix.
[02:45] R.L. Stine for Adults?: A discussion on how the film adapts the book series, noting it feels like a "Goosebumps for adults" with significantly more violence.
[06:50] The Netflix Model: The team discusses how the weekly release strategy helped build hype, comparing it to the traditional theatrical model.
[11:06] 90s Nostalgia: The crew enjoys the 90s references, from the Software Etc. store in the mall to the era-appropriate soundtrack.
[11:58] The Bread Slicer Kill: A breakdown of the movie's most brutal scene, where a character is pushed through a bread slicer, marking a high point for the "Goro-Meter."
[23:04] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The group agrees that while not necessarily "creepy" or scary in a dread-inducing way, the film scores high on watchability and gore, making it a solid modern horror entry.

The discussion centers on the film's massive shift in tone from the 2018 reboot, moving from suspense to all-out warfare. The group notes the staggering body count—likely the highest in the franchise—and the brutal nature of the kills, including the firefighter massacre and the lightbulb throat stab. However, they are split on the execution of the plot. Josh expresses disappointment in the "mob mentality" storyline and the baffling decision to sideline Jamie Lee Curtis for most of the runtime. The crew also debates the "Evil Dies Tonight" mantra, the confusing hospital suicide scene, and the illogical choices made by characters who should know better (like bringing a small knife to a Michael Myers fight).

Key Highlights
[01:27] The Director & Production: A look at David Gordon Green and Danny McBride returning to direct/write, and how their comedy background influences the horror.
[06:42] A Massive Disappointment?: Josh shares his initial disappointment, noting that the film felt like "filler" to set up the final movie in the trilogy, Halloween Ends.
[08:05] The Firefighter Massacre: The group breaks down the controversial scene where Michael takes out an entire squad of armed firefighters, marking a shift towards him being an unstoppable force.
[12:10] Where is Laurie Strode?: A discussion on Jamie Lee Curtis being stuck in a hospital bed for the majority of the film, leaving the heavy lifting to side characters.
[13:24] The Mob Mentality Mistake: The crew criticizes the hospital scene where the mob chases an innocent mental patient to his death, feeling the social commentary was heavy-handed and poorly executed.
[33:21] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The team agrees this isn't a "creepy" movie but rather a gory one. If it were a "Goro-Meter," it would be a 10/10 due to the visceral nature of the kills (eyeball gouging, bone snapping).

Unlike the haunted house formula of the previous films, this entry focuses on a procedural investigation and a "transference" of possession. Josh surprisingly claims this is the best Conjuring movie so far, praising the storyline over the pure scare factor, even though he felt the human "occultist" villain was weaker than a demon. The discussion touches on the real-life Arne Johnson case, the "serial killer" trophy room of the Warrens, and the controversial decision to have Ed Warren sidelined by a heart attack for most of the film. The group ends with a "Creepo-Meter" rating, generally agreeing it hovers around a 4/10 on the scare scale, relying more on body horror (like the "pretzel" contortions) than dread.

Key Highlights
[00:40] Break from the List: The hosts explain they are skipping the #27 spot (Annabelle) to review the newly released The Conjuring 3.
[02:27] Best of the Trilogy?: Josh argues that story-wise, this is the best Conjuring film, preferring the "transference" plot over the standard haunted house tropes.
[07:38] The True Story: A discussion on the real-life basis of the film—the trial of Arne Johnson, who claimed "the devil made me do it" after killing his landlord.
[20:31] The Warrens' Trophy Room: The crew questions the logic of keeping cursed objects like the occultist's chalice in a house instead of destroying them or locking them in a storage unit far away.
[26:27] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The group rates the film a 4 out of 10. While not terrifying, the body horror scenes involving bone-breaking contortions effectively grossed them out.
[33:27] What's Next: The team announces their upcoming schedule: a review of the Fear Street trilogy on Netflix before returning to the "Science of Scare" list.

The discussion highlights the film's humble origins, noting that it was admittedly created to ride the coattails of Halloween (1978). Despite its low budget and "B-movie" status, the crew marvels at its massive box office return. A significant portion of the conversation focuses on the "Mandela Effect" regarding the killer; while everyone associates the franchise with Jason Voorhees, the group revisits the shock of the original twist—that Jason's mother, Pamela Voorhees, was the one doing the killing. The episode wraps up with a nostalgic look back at the scare factor, with Paul noting that while it was a solid 7 or 8 on the "Creepo-Meter" in 1980, modern desensitization drops that score significantly today.

Key Highlights
[01:16] Science of Scare #28: The hosts introduce Friday the 13th as the 28th scariest movie according to science, based on heart rate studies. [05:08] Ripping Off Halloween: The group discusses how the producers explicitly aimed to copy the success of Halloween, placing ads for the film before the script was even written.
[07:39] Budget vs. Box Office: A breakdown of the financials, noting the film made nearly $60 million on a shoestring budget of roughly $550,000.
[14:15] Kevin Bacon’s Cameo: The crew points out one of the film's most famous trivia bits: a young Kevin Bacon in one of his earliest roles before hitting it big with Footloose.
[17:42] The Pamela Voorhees Twist: A discussion on the ending reveal, clarifying that Jason was not the killer in the first movie, and how subsequent sequels retconned his survival.
[46:22] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The team gives their scare ratings. Paul argues it was a 7/8 back in 1980, but the group agrees that by modern standards, it sits closer to a 3 or 4.

The hosts are unanimous in their appreciation for the film's quality, highlighting its heartbreaking plot and the chilling "One, Two, Three, Knock on the Wall" game scene. However, they struggle to classify it as a true horror film, leaning more towards a supernatural tragedy or thriller. They discuss the devastating twist ending involving the fate of the missing son, Simon, and the eerie presence of the masked boy, Tomas. The episode also touches on the effectiveness of subtitles versus dubbing and the film's atmospheric tension over cheap jump scares.

Key Highlights
[00:46] Science of Scare #29: The hosts introduce The Orphanage as the 29th scariest movie according to scientific heart rate studies.
[02:40] Is It Scary?: A recurring theme in the review—while the movie is excellent, the crew questions if it's "scary" enough for its ranking, noting it feels more like a tragic drama with ghosts.
[05:20] The Game Scene: The group discusses the intense "One, Two, Three, Knock on the Wall" scene, which stands out as one of the few genuinely creepy moments.
[08:15] The Twist Ending: A breakdown of the heartbreaking reveal that Laura accidentally caused Simon's death, locking him in the basement where he fell and died.
[12:30] Guillermo del Toro's Influence: The hosts note the producer's signature style in the film's fairy-tale-like atmosphere and emotional storytelling.
[27:00] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores reflect the film's quality but lack of terror. Jeremy gives it a 2, while Josh and Elaine rate it similarly low on the "scare" scale, though all agree it's a must-watch film.

The discussion is lukewarm at best. While Jeremy appreciated the subtle alien designs and the clever use of light reflections to create symbols, Josh and Elaine found the movie largely boring and filled with plot holes. They lament the underuse of the brilliant J.K. Simmons, whose character appears briefly to deliver exposition and then vanishes. The hosts also break down the ending twist—where the aliens take the older son instead of the younger one—and question the logic of the parents not noticing their child's massive bruises earlier.

Key Highlights
[00:46] Science of Scare #30: The hosts introduce Dark Skies as the 30th scariest movie according to the scientific study, though they question its placement.
[01:36] Horror or Sci-Fi?: A debate on the genre, with the group leaning towards it being a sci-fi thriller rather than a true horror film due to the lack of kills and focus on abduction.
[06:42] J.K. Simmons Cameo: The crew expresses disappointment that J.K. Simmons had such a small role, basically serving as an exposition dump for five minutes.
[07:17] The Twist Ending: A discussion on the finale, where the aliens abduct the older brother, Jesse, subverting the movie's focus on the younger Sam.
[15:43] Plot Holes: Josh points out major logic gaps, such as the parents not noticing their son's extensive bruising until a pool party and the lack of CPS involvement despite threats.
[27:06] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores are low again. Jeremy gives it a 1, while Josh and Elaine rate it a 2, agreeing it was watchable but far from scary.

The discussion centers on the film's infamous "head on a stick" scene, which Elaine found particularly disturbing, while Josh felt the movie was "lame" compared to other slashers like The Hills Have Eyes. They break down the character of Mick Taylor (John Jarratt), comparing him to a serial killer version of Crocodile Dundee, and question the logic of the protagonists' decisions. The group also debates the "based on true events" claim, noting its loose connection to the Ivan Milat murders, and wonders why this movie ranks so highly on a scientific scare list when it has such a low body count.

Key Highlights
[00:54] Science of Scare #31: The hosts introduce Wolf Creek as the 31st scariest movie according to the scientific study, noting its Australian origins and low budget.
[04:33] The Gore Factor: Elaine describes her visceral reaction to the "head on a stick" scene involving a severed spine, calling it "cringeworthy" in a disturbing way.
[07:45] Mick Taylor: A discussion on the antagonist, with the group noting the actor's performance and the eerie "Crocodile Dundee" vibes he gives off before turning violent.
[10:02] Logic Gaps: The crew critiques the "teleporting killer" trope, questioning how Mick always knew exactly where the escaping victims were hiding in the massive outback.
[27:00] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores are mixed. Elaine gives it a 5/10 for the "cringe" factor of the torture scenes, Josh rates it a 4/10, and Jeremy gives it a 3/10, citing a lack of atmospheric creepiness or effective music.
[40:30] Upcoming Schedule: The team announces that the next movie on the list is Dark Skies (#30), followed by The Orphanage (#29).

The hosts praise Jack Nicholson’s iconic performance as Jack Torrance, noting his natural creepiness even before the "madness" fully sets in. They also discuss the eerie performance of Danny Lloyd as Danny Torrance, whose "Redrum" scenes still send shivers down their spines. The conversation touches on the film's famous ambiguity, the differences between Stephen King's book and Kubrick's adaptation, and the memorable "Here's Johnny!" moment. They also touch on the sequel Doctor Sleep and how it expands the lore.

Key Highlights
[01:00] Science of Scare #33: The hosts introduce The Shining as the 33rd scariest movie according to scientific heart rate studies.
[02:45] Danny Torrance: Jeremy highlights Danny Lloyd's performance as the creepiest part of the movie, particularly his "Redrum" chanting. [09:20] "Here's Johnny!": A discussion on the famous improvised line, noting its origin from The Tonight Show and how it might be lost on modern audiences.
[12:35] Supernatural vs. Madness: The group debates if Jack was always a "douche" who just needed a push, or if the hotel's ghosts (like the bartender and the woman in Room 237) actively possessed him.
[15:00] Room 237: A breakdown of the pivotal scene where Jack encounters the woman in the bathtub, marking his full descent into the hotel's grip.
[36:00] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores are solid, with Josh giving it a 5-6/10, Jeremy a 5/10, and Elaine (before dropping off) a 4/10, agreeing it’s more atmospheric and tense than "jump-scare" scary.

The discussion focuses on the film's strength as a psychological thriller rather than a traditional horror movie. The hosts appreciate the subtle foreshadowing—like the deer symbolism and the dad's awkward attempts to relate to Chris—that becomes clear on a rewatch. However, they universally agree that the movie lacks the visceral fear or heart-pounding moments found in other entries like Sinister or The Conjuring. They also touch on the "hypnosis" aspect, sharing personal stories about whether hypnosis is real, and debate the effectiveness of the few jump scares present.

Key Highlights
[00:43] Science of Scare #34: The hosts introduce the movie as the 34th scariest film according to a scientific study based on heart rate. [03:10] Foreshadowing: A deep dive into the clues hidden in the first act, such as the dad's "I would have voted for Obama a third time" line and the way he describes the black servants.
[10:30] The Milk Scene: Josh points out the "psycho" energy of the daughter eating Froot Loops separately from a glass of milk while hunting for her next victim.
[11:08] Is It Scary?: The group unanimously agrees that while it's a great movie, it isn't "scary" in the traditional sense, questioning the methodology of the "Science of Scare" list.
[17:00] Hypnosis Debate: A funny detour where the crew discusses the reality of hypnosis, with Jeremy recounting a time Elaine was allegedly hypnotized at a comedy show.
[26:15] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores are rock bottom. All hosts—Jeremy, Josh, Aaron, and Elaine—give it a 0/10 on the "Creepo-Meter," emphasizing that while it's an excellent film, it didn't scare them at all.

The group universally pans the film for its excruciatingly slow pace, noting that the "horror" doesn't kick in until the final 15 minutes of the nearly two-hour runtime. They discuss the infamous "kiri-kiri-kiri" torture scene involving acupuncture needles and wire saws, but argue that the payoff wasn't worth the boredom. The conversation gets heated as they debate whether the protagonist was hallucinating the entire time, question the logic of drinking someone's vomit (allegedly real, according to trivia), and wonder why this movie is ranked on a "scariest movies" list at all.

Key Highlights
[01:13] New Series: The hosts introduce their new format, reviewing the "Top 35 Scariest Movies According to Science," starting with #35, Audition.
[04:21] The Slow Burn: A major complaint from all hosts is that the movie feels like a drama for the first hour and 40 minutes, with the horror elements only appearing at the very end.
[05:50] The Bag Scene: The crew discusses the gross-out moment involving a mutilated man in a bag eating vomit, which they found more disgusting than scary.
[15:43] Torture Porn?: A debate on whether the movie qualifies as "torture porn." Josh argues it barely qualifies compared to films like Saw or Hostel because the torture scene is relatively short.
[27:04] Hallucination Theory: The group theorizes that the main character might have been hallucinating the entire ending after being drugged, or perhaps he was the man in the bag all along.
[32:00] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores are brutal. Jeremy gives it a 0, Josh a 1, and Aaron a 3, agreeing that while it had shock value, it failed to be genuinely creepy or scary.

The hosts are nearly unanimous in their praise, with many ranking it as one of the best, if not the best, in the franchise. They highlight the strong storytelling, the emotional stakes involving Ed Warren’s potential death, and the introduction of iconic villains like Valak (The Nun) and the Crooked Man. The discussion also touches on the effective use of foreshadowing, the seamless blend of practical effects and CGI, and how watching the movies in chronological order enhances the experience by connecting dots that might otherwise be missed.

Key Highlights
[01:14] Chronological Finale: The hosts confirm this is the final movie in their current chronological watch before the release of The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It.
[05:20] The Valak Connection: A discussion on how watching The Nun first enhances the viewing experience of The Conjuring 2, as the demon's presence and Ed's vision of his death have more weight.
[08:00] Best Scenes: The group breaks down standout moments, including the shadow scene with the painting of the Nun and the "Crooked Man" sequence, which Josh found particularly creepy.
[12:00] Real Life Accuracy: Jeremy notes the impressive attention to detail in the end credits, comparing the movie's actors and sets to real-life photos of the Enfield haunting.
[15:45] The Crooked Man: A debate on the character, with the group appreciating his unique design and hoping he remains a secondary villain rather than getting a potentially cheesy spinoff.
[43:08] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores reflect the film's quality but lack of "jump scares" for seasoned horror fans. Aaron gives it a 3, Josh a 2, Elaine a 2, and Jeremy a 2, agreeing it was an excellent movie but not necessarily terrifying.

The review is mixed, with the group generally finding the movie "bland" compared to the highs of The Conjuring 2 or even Annabelle Comes Home. They critique the anticlimactic ending, where the terrifying entity is dispatched with a simple stab, and question the logic of characters who seem to change motivations on a dime. However, they do praise some specific scares, such as the umbrella scene by the pool and the tension of the car windows rolling down on their own.

Key Highlights
[01:13] Chronological Context: The hosts introduce the movie as the sixth in their chronological watch, set in 1973, placing it after Annabelle Comes Home.
[02:29] Aaron's Take: Aaron describes the movie as "bland" with a few good moments, feeling it lacked the punch of the other films in the series. [03:52] The Ending: A discussion on the abrupt and anticlimactic finale, where the demon is defeated too easily with a cross and a stab.
[07:44] The Conjuring Connection: The group debates how well the movie fits into the universe, noting the appearance of Tony Amendola as Father Perez and the flashback to the Annabelle doll as the primary links.
[20:53] The Car Scene: Josh highlights his favorite scene involving the car windows rolling down manually while the children are trapped inside, praising the tension.
[24:00] Creepo-Meter Ratings: The scores are low across the board, with Aaron giving it a 3, Josh a 3, and Jeremy a 2, agreeing it wasn't particularly scary or memorable.

The discussion is far more positive than the previous episode on Annabelle. The hosts praise the film's effective scares, particularly the iconic "Hide and Clap" scene and the wardrobe jump scare. They dive into the real-life history of the Perron family haunting versus the "Hollywood glitter" added for the screen, and debate whether the movie deserves its reputation as one of the scariest films ever made. The episode also features a breakdown of a scientific study on heart rates during horror movies, with The Conjuring ranking high on the list.

Key Highlights
[00:46] Chronological Timeline: The hosts confirm this is the fourth movie in their timeline watch, set in 1971, three years after the events of the first Annabelle scene.
[03:57] The Clapping Game: A discussion on the "Hide and Clap" scene, which the group agrees is one of the most effective and suspenseful moments in the entire franchise.
[07:23] Real Life vs. Hollywood: Jeremy breaks down the differences between the movie and the real Warren case files, noting that the real Bathsheba Sherman wasn't accused of witchcraft in the same way.
[09:40] The Science of Scare: Jeremy shares a list of the top 10 scariest movies based on heart rate studies, revealing where The Conjuring, Sinister, and Hereditary rank.
[25:56] Better than Paranormal Activity?: A debate on found footage vs. traditional horror, with the group agreeing that The Conjuring is a much stronger film than the Paranormal Activity series.
[57:00] Final Ratings: The "Creepo-Meter" scores come in higher than previous episodes, with Elaine giving it a 4/10 and the brothers rating it around a 2 or 3, acknowledging it's a good movie even if they've become desensitized to the scares.

The discussion centers on the film's lackluster scares, with all three hosts agreeing that it fails to deliver the tension found in The Nun or even Annabelle: Creation. They criticize the plot holes—like a husband buying a used doll for his pregnant wife—and the questionable decision-making of the characters. The episode also features a hilarious detour where Aaron recounts a terrifying experience at a Universal Studios haunted maze and the group debates the creepiness of other horror classics like Sinister and Hereditary.

Key Highlights
[01:16] Welcome Aaron: Aaron joins the podcast for the first time, joking that they picked the "worst movie" for his debut.
[02:14] Rotten Tomatoes Reality: The hosts discuss the movie's abysmal 29% critic score and compare it to other low-rated horror films like Tusk.
[04:42] Zero Jump Scares: Jeremy notes that unlike the previous movies, Annabelle had almost no effective jump scares, making it a bore to sit through.
[05:36] Universal Studios Story: Aaron shares a funny story about getting scared by a "wall person" at a Universal Studios horror maze.
[09:08] The Creepiest Movies: The group lists scientifically rated "scariest movies," including Sinister, Hereditary, and The Conjuring, setting up future episodes.
[34:50] The Final Verdict: The "Creepo-Meter" hits an all-time low, with Josh and Jeremy giving the movie a zero and Aaron giving it a generous one solely for the "long fingers" scene.

The discussion gets heated as Josh argues that the movie relies too heavily on characters making bad decisions—like walking into dark rooms or investigating creepy noises when they should be running away. Jeremy, however, appreciates that the doll itself doesn't walk around like Chucky, maintaining a more subtle, demonic presence. They also break down the "gore factor," specifically a gruesome finger-breaking scene and a shocking moment involving the mother, and compare the "Creepiness Factor" to the previous week's movie.

Key Highlights
[01:54] Chronological Watch: The hosts confirm that Annabelle: Creation is the second movie in their chronological timeline watch of The Conjuring Universe, set in 1955.
[05:00] Valak Cameo: A discussion on the subtle Easter egg where the demon nun Valak appears in a photograph, tying the movie back to the first episode's review.
[06:30] The Demon's Form: Jeremy notes his relief that the doll doesn't walk, but they discuss the reveal of the demon's true form, comparing it to the devil in the movie Legend.
[15:30] The Gore Factor: A breakdown of the movie's more visceral moments, including a gruesome finger-breaking scene involving the father (Anthony LaPaglia).
[26:35] Creepiness Ratings: Josh gives it a 7/10 for creepiness, citing his fear of dolls, while Jeremy rates it a lower 2 or 3, finding it less atmospheric than The Nun.
[30:53] What's Next: The team announces that the next episode will cover the original Annabelle movie, continuing the timeline.

The crew debates whether the film relies too heavily on jump scares or if it successfully builds a creepy atmosphere. While Josh admits he isn't usually a fan of ghost movies, he appreciated the demonic lore, whereas Elaine found herself jumping more than a few times. They also discuss the "Exorcist III" style scares, the connection between actress Taissa Farmiga and her sister Vera Farmiga (Lorraine Warren), and give their final "Creepiness Factor" ratings out of 10.

Key Highlights
[01:19] Welcome to Scream Creeps: The hosts introduce the new horror-focused podcast and their plan to watch the Conjuring movies in chronological order.
[02:43] The Rating System: Jeremy explains the "Creepiness Factor" (1-10), jump scare count, and "Horror Trope" identification system they will use for reviews.
[05:30] Elaine’s Take: Elaine shares her experience, admitting she jumped 4-5 times during the movie despite knowing the scares were coming. [11:02] The Warren Connection: A discussion on the casting of Taissa Farmiga and how the movie subtly ties into Lorraine Warren’s future storyline.
[14:57] Best Scenes: The group breaks down their favorite moments, including the coffin scene and the "hanging nun" reveal.
[33:10] Final Ratings: The crew gives their final scores, with the consensus landing around a 5 or 6 out of 10 on the creepiness scale.