<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/monegasque" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The Monégasque Table</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/monegasque</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Straight answers about edible glitter — is it safe, how much do you use, and is it really worth it? The Monégasque Table is a show where two hosts, Margaux and Dana, settle the questions home bakers and party hosts actually ask: safety, value, technique, and what the label really means. Every episode answers one question, gives the verdict up front, and says honestly who should skip it. Brought to you by MONÉGASQUE. Produced with AI-crafted hosts and human-checked facts.</description>
    <copyright>© 2026 MONEGASQUE LLC</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>559c5e23-4773-5f56-b39e-439c7c607614</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 06:00:13 -0800</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 06:01:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <link>http://www.monegasquellc.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Arts">
      <itunes:category text="Food"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Leisure">
      <itunes:category text="Crafts"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/9Kboue7WorZO0ymosgbKRpmoBcOdvkj4LCGyyG526QQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lMzE3/MmFjMTMyYjIyMDM0/YTMzNjJkNGJlNjAx/NTRiNS5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Straight answers about edible glitter — is it safe, how much do you use, and is it really worth it? The Monégasque Table is a show where two hosts, Margaux and Dana, settle the questions home bakers and party hosts actually ask: safety, value, technique, and what the label really means. Every episode answers one question, gives the verdict up front, and says honestly who should skip it. Brought to you by MONÉGASQUE. Produced with AI-crafted hosts and human-checked facts.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Straight answers about edible glitter — is it safe, how much do you use, and is it really worth it.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, edible glitter for drinks, cocktail glitter, baking, food decorating, home baking</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>MONEGASQUE</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>contact@monegasquellc.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Espresso Martini: The Shimmer Goes on the Foam</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>106</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Espresso Martini: The Shimmer Goes on the Foam</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9eb548b2-f3ba-4e0a-8608-7fe437d09e19</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c2d98626</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in an espresso martini? Yes, on the foam, because the dark drink underneath hides everything else.

The espresso martini in this episode is a classic from a recipe site: 2 ounces vodka, 1/2 ounce coffee liqueur, 1 ounce espresso and 1/2 ounce simple syrup, shaken hard with ice and strained into a chilled coupe. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains where the foam comes from: coffee oils trap air during a vigorous shake, fresh espresso makes the thickest layer, and cold brew makes a thinner one. That foam is the only pale surface in the drink, so a light dusting of gold luster dust through a small strainer is what shows. Dana wins the number, a smaller pinch for a small circle of foam, and then wins the round: bring the drinks out plain and dust the shimmer on at the table, in front of each guest, before the coffee beans go on. The hosts also explain why the shimmer stays on the cocktail and never goes on a morning latte.

In this episode:
- Why the shimmer goes on the foam, not in the coffee
- How the shake makes the foam
- Dust versus flake on a pale surface
- How much for a small circle of foam
- Dana's round: dust it at the table

Who should skip it: rounds without a good foam, decaf or alcohol-free coffee drinks, and lovers of the classic look.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Yes, on the foam. Shake 2 ounces vodka, 1/2 ounce coffee liqueur, 1 ounce cooled espresso and 1/2 ounce simple syrup hard with ice so the coffee oils build a thick foam, strain into a chilled coupe, then tap a light dusting of gold luster dust over the foam through a small strainer. Glitter stirred into the dark coffee mostly disappears; start with a small pinch and add.

- 00:00 Cold open — the least clear drink there is
- 00:25 The verdict: shimmer on the foam
- 01:30 Sparkle Lab: where the foam comes from
- 02:40 Cold brew and a thinner foam
- 03:20 Dust or flake, and how much
- 04:40 Dana's round: dust it at the table
- 05:40 Why not a latte? The beverage entry
- 06:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-espresso-martini-the-shimmer-goes-on-the-foam/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in an espresso martini? Yes, on the foam, because the dark drink underneath hides everything else.

The espresso martini in this episode is a classic from a recipe site: 2 ounces vodka, 1/2 ounce coffee liqueur, 1 ounce espresso and 1/2 ounce simple syrup, shaken hard with ice and strained into a chilled coupe. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains where the foam comes from: coffee oils trap air during a vigorous shake, fresh espresso makes the thickest layer, and cold brew makes a thinner one. That foam is the only pale surface in the drink, so a light dusting of gold luster dust through a small strainer is what shows. Dana wins the number, a smaller pinch for a small circle of foam, and then wins the round: bring the drinks out plain and dust the shimmer on at the table, in front of each guest, before the coffee beans go on. The hosts also explain why the shimmer stays on the cocktail and never goes on a morning latte.

In this episode:
- Why the shimmer goes on the foam, not in the coffee
- How the shake makes the foam
- Dust versus flake on a pale surface
- How much for a small circle of foam
- Dana's round: dust it at the table

Who should skip it: rounds without a good foam, decaf or alcohol-free coffee drinks, and lovers of the classic look.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Yes, on the foam. Shake 2 ounces vodka, 1/2 ounce coffee liqueur, 1 ounce cooled espresso and 1/2 ounce simple syrup hard with ice so the coffee oils build a thick foam, strain into a chilled coupe, then tap a light dusting of gold luster dust over the foam through a small strainer. Glitter stirred into the dark coffee mostly disappears; start with a small pinch and add.

- 00:00 Cold open — the least clear drink there is
- 00:25 The verdict: shimmer on the foam
- 01:30 Sparkle Lab: where the foam comes from
- 02:40 Cold brew and a thinner foam
- 03:20 Dust or flake, and how much
- 04:40 Dana's round: dust it at the table
- 05:40 Why not a latte? The beverage entry
- 06:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-espresso-martini-the-shimmer-goes-on-the-foam/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 06:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c2d98626/2487f696.mp3" length="7146974" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>446</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Glitter vanishes in a dark drink. In an espresso martini it goes on the pale foam, and the foam depends on how hard you shake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Glitter vanishes in a dark drink. In an espresso martini it goes on the pale foam, and the foam depends on how hard you shake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>espresso martini, edible glitter espresso martini, coffee cocktail, after-dinner cocktails, gold luster dust, edible glitter for drinks, cocktail garnish, holiday cocktails</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c2d98626/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Cinnamon Roll Icing: The Christmas Morning Countdown</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>105</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Cinnamon Roll Icing: The Christmas Morning Countdown</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8eda368c-a9f8-4156-9d58-bfef15d7d34b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f4a0a9bb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on cinnamon roll icing for Christmas morning? On wet icing, on warm rolls, as the last step before the table.

The rolls in this episode are a baking site's one-rise cinnamon rolls, with a make-ahead path built in: make the dough Christmas Eve through shaping, refrigerate it overnight, then let it rise about 1 hour during presents and bake at 375 degrees for 24 to 27 minutes. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains why cinnamon rolls break the wait-until-cool rule: warm rolls keep the icing wet and glossy, which is exactly the surface glitter grabs. Dana walks through last year's Christmas morning, when the rolls landed at 9:15 and the glitter stayed in the pantry, and the hosts build the countdown from one week out to the table. Dana wins the round: measure the glitter the night before into a tea strainer beside the spatula, so the sparkle takes 10 seconds and cannot be forgotten. Then the three questions other parents ask: is it safe for my kids, will it taste weird, and is this one more thing on the busiest morning of the year.

In this episode:
- Why warm icing is the glitter window
- The Christmas Eve make-ahead, step by step
- The morning timeline: fridge, rise, bake, ice, sparkle
- Dana's round: the strainer next to the spatula
- Edible versus non-toxic, and what the label should show

Who should skip it: anyone icing the rolls the night before, families who love the plain gooey roll, and pans traveling a long way to someone else's house.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put the glitter on the icing while it is still wet, right after spreading it on the warm rolls, then serve. For Christmas morning, make the dough the night before through shaping and refrigerate it; in the morning, let it rise about 1 hour, bake at 375 degrees for 24 to 27 minutes, spread the cream cheese icing on warm, and sprinkle a small, pre-measured pinch of edible glitter on top.

- 00:00 Cold open — 7:00 a.m. at the top of the stairs
- 00:30 The verdict: wet icing, warm rolls, glitter last
- 02:00 Sparkle Lab: why warm icing is the window
- 04:00 The icing, and flake versus dust
- 06:00 Dana's Christmas morning, last year
- 07:30 The countdown: one week out to the table
- 10:30 Dana's round: the strainer next to the spatula
- 12:30 Is it safe for my kids? Edible versus non-toxic
- 14:30 Will it taste weird? No time? Leftovers
- 16:00 How much · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-cinnamon-roll-icing-the-christmas-morning-countdown/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on cinnamon roll icing for Christmas morning? On wet icing, on warm rolls, as the last step before the table.

The rolls in this episode are a baking site's one-rise cinnamon rolls, with a make-ahead path built in: make the dough Christmas Eve through shaping, refrigerate it overnight, then let it rise about 1 hour during presents and bake at 375 degrees for 24 to 27 minutes. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains why cinnamon rolls break the wait-until-cool rule: warm rolls keep the icing wet and glossy, which is exactly the surface glitter grabs. Dana walks through last year's Christmas morning, when the rolls landed at 9:15 and the glitter stayed in the pantry, and the hosts build the countdown from one week out to the table. Dana wins the round: measure the glitter the night before into a tea strainer beside the spatula, so the sparkle takes 10 seconds and cannot be forgotten. Then the three questions other parents ask: is it safe for my kids, will it taste weird, and is this one more thing on the busiest morning of the year.

In this episode:
- Why warm icing is the glitter window
- The Christmas Eve make-ahead, step by step
- The morning timeline: fridge, rise, bake, ice, sparkle
- Dana's round: the strainer next to the spatula
- Edible versus non-toxic, and what the label should show

Who should skip it: anyone icing the rolls the night before, families who love the plain gooey roll, and pans traveling a long way to someone else's house.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put the glitter on the icing while it is still wet, right after spreading it on the warm rolls, then serve. For Christmas morning, make the dough the night before through shaping and refrigerate it; in the morning, let it rise about 1 hour, bake at 375 degrees for 24 to 27 minutes, spread the cream cheese icing on warm, and sprinkle a small, pre-measured pinch of edible glitter on top.

- 00:00 Cold open — 7:00 a.m. at the top of the stairs
- 00:30 The verdict: wet icing, warm rolls, glitter last
- 02:00 Sparkle Lab: why warm icing is the window
- 04:00 The icing, and flake versus dust
- 06:00 Dana's Christmas morning, last year
- 07:30 The countdown: one week out to the table
- 10:30 Dana's round: the strainer next to the spatula
- 12:30 Is it safe for my kids? Edible versus non-toxic
- 14:30 Will it taste weird? No time? Leftovers
- 16:00 How much · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-cinnamon-roll-icing-the-christmas-morning-countdown/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f4a0a9bb/60f34f8e.mp3" length="16136449" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1008</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sparkly Christmas rolls fail on timing, not technique. Make the dough Christmas Eve, ice them warm, and have the glitter measured.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sparkly Christmas rolls fail on timing, not technique. Make the dough Christmas Eve, ice them warm, and have the glitter measured.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>cinnamon rolls, Christmas morning breakfast, edible glitter icing, cream cheese icing, make-ahead cinnamon rolls, Christmas baking, gold luster dust, edible glitter for kids</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f4a0a9bb/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Margarita: Salt Rim or Shaker?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>104</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>104</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Margarita: Salt Rim or Shaker?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b2fcb1a4-c525-4d3a-b188-080b2fc41533</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0572fa2c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Where does the edible glitter go in a margarita? In the drink, so it swirls, with the salt rim as a bonus.

The margarita in this episode is a classic: 1 ounce blanco tequila, 1 ounce orange liqueur, 1 ounce fresh lime juice and 1/2 ounce agave, shaken with ice and strained into a glass rimmed with lime and coarse salt. Margaux explains why a pinch of glitter in the liquid gives the swirl people photograph, while glitter in the salt is a few sparkles on a white line, and why the glass must be rimmed while it is still empty. Then the crowd: the recipe multiplies by 8 and stirs it in a pitcher. Margaux wants every drink shaken; Dana wins the round, because the recipe itself says stir for a crowd, and a clear pitcher stirred before every pour puts the swirl right on the bar. A pitcher of 8 takes 0.8 grams of glitter, about $1.20.

In this episode:
- Rim or drink: where the glitter does the most
- The rim order: lime, salt, ice, pour
- Dana's round: the pitcher, stirred before every pour
- The pitcher math: 0.8 grams, about $1.20
- Why frozen margaritas hide the sparkle

Who should skip it: frozen blended margaritas, colored or frosted glassware, and strawberry or mango versions where the color hides the swirl.

MONÉGASQUE Liquid Gold 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put the glitter in the drink. Shake a pinch, about 0.1 grams, with 1 ounce tequila, 1 ounce orange liqueur, 1 ounce lime juice and 1/2 ounce agave, and strain it into a glass rimmed with lime and coarse salt; a little glitter in the rim salt is a bonus. For a crowd, multiply by 8 and stir it in a clear pitcher with ice, stirring again before each pour.

- 00:00 Cold open — multiply by 8
- 00:20 The verdict: in the drink, rim as a bonus
- 01:00 Why the swirl beats the rim
- 01:40 The rim order: empty glass first
- 02:20 Dana's round: the pitcher
- 03:00 Pitcher math, the beverage entry, cloudy versus frozen
- 03:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-margarita-salt-rim-or-shaker/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Where does the edible glitter go in a margarita? In the drink, so it swirls, with the salt rim as a bonus.

The margarita in this episode is a classic: 1 ounce blanco tequila, 1 ounce orange liqueur, 1 ounce fresh lime juice and 1/2 ounce agave, shaken with ice and strained into a glass rimmed with lime and coarse salt. Margaux explains why a pinch of glitter in the liquid gives the swirl people photograph, while glitter in the salt is a few sparkles on a white line, and why the glass must be rimmed while it is still empty. Then the crowd: the recipe multiplies by 8 and stirs it in a pitcher. Margaux wants every drink shaken; Dana wins the round, because the recipe itself says stir for a crowd, and a clear pitcher stirred before every pour puts the swirl right on the bar. A pitcher of 8 takes 0.8 grams of glitter, about $1.20.

In this episode:
- Rim or drink: where the glitter does the most
- The rim order: lime, salt, ice, pour
- Dana's round: the pitcher, stirred before every pour
- The pitcher math: 0.8 grams, about $1.20
- Why frozen margaritas hide the sparkle

Who should skip it: frozen blended margaritas, colored or frosted glassware, and strawberry or mango versions where the color hides the swirl.

MONÉGASQUE Liquid Gold 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put the glitter in the drink. Shake a pinch, about 0.1 grams, with 1 ounce tequila, 1 ounce orange liqueur, 1 ounce lime juice and 1/2 ounce agave, and strain it into a glass rimmed with lime and coarse salt; a little glitter in the rim salt is a bonus. For a crowd, multiply by 8 and stir it in a clear pitcher with ice, stirring again before each pour.

- 00:00 Cold open — multiply by 8
- 00:20 The verdict: in the drink, rim as a bonus
- 01:00 Why the swirl beats the rim
- 01:40 The rim order: empty glass first
- 02:20 Dana's round: the pitcher
- 03:00 Pitcher math, the beverage entry, cloudy versus frozen
- 03:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-margarita-salt-rim-or-shaker/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0572fa2c/e1391cac.mp3" length="4693537" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>292</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A glitter rim glints; glitter in the drink swirls. Put it in the margarita, and for a crowd, stir it into a clear pitcher.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A glitter rim glints; glitter in the drink swirls. Put it in the margarita, and for a crowd, stir it into a clear pitcher.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>glitter margarita, edible glitter margarita, margarita salt rim, signature cocktail, party margaritas, edible glitter for drinks, gold edible glitter, cocktail pitcher</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0572fa2c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Homemade Caramels: What It Costs Per Piece</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>103</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>103</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Homemade Caramels: What It Costs Per Piece</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6e1c74b-6668-401d-aa26-d25d2c72c5a2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/43a1153b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What does edible glitter on homemade caramels cost per piece? The real number comes from your own scale, not a guess.

The recipe in this episode is a newspaper soft caramel: cooked to the soft ball stage at 240°F, poured without scraping into a buttered 13 by 9 or 15 by 10 pan, cooled overnight for about 10 hours, then cut into about 100 one-inch squares and wrapped in waxed paper. The hosts explain why the glitter goes on in the minutes after the pour, then do the money: about $1.00 a gram for a 15 gram jar, about $1.43 for 7 grams, about $1.50 for a 10 gram glitter jar, and about 71 cents for the 12-color gift set. Dana wins the round: the cheapest gram is the one you actually use, so a one-color caramel business buys its one color in the 15 gram jar instead of eleven shades it will never open. Then: Amazon's business quantity ladder, and what to hand a caterer who asks what is in the sparkle.

In this episode:
- The weigh-the-jar method for cost per piece
- When the glitter goes on a caramel slab
- The per-gram board, and why the cheapest gram can be the expensive one
- Buying for a season: 5% off at 2 jars, up to 20% at 50
- What to tell a customer who asks what is in it

Who should skip it: caramels wrapped in opaque paper and eaten fast, one-pan-a-year makers, and batches you cannot glitter right after pouring.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing. Documentation requests go to the team through the contact page.

**Direct answer (top):** Weigh it. Weigh your glitter jar before and after one pan of caramels, divide the grams used by the roughly 100 pieces one recipe yields, and multiply by your price per gram, about $1.00 for a 15 gram luster dust jar at $14.99. Sprinkle the glitter right after pouring, while the caramel is hot and glossy, and buy the one color you actually use.

- 00:00 Cold open — 100 caramels, one pan
- 00:25 The verdict: weigh the jar, divide by 100
- 01:50 When the glitter goes on the slab
- 02:40 The per-gram board
- 03:30 Dana's round: the cheapest gram is the one you use
- 04:40 Buying for the season, and the practice pan
- 05:30 What's in the sparkle: the label, the listing, the supplier questions
- 06:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-homemade-caramels-what-it-costs-per-piece/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What does edible glitter on homemade caramels cost per piece? The real number comes from your own scale, not a guess.

The recipe in this episode is a newspaper soft caramel: cooked to the soft ball stage at 240°F, poured without scraping into a buttered 13 by 9 or 15 by 10 pan, cooled overnight for about 10 hours, then cut into about 100 one-inch squares and wrapped in waxed paper. The hosts explain why the glitter goes on in the minutes after the pour, then do the money: about $1.00 a gram for a 15 gram jar, about $1.43 for 7 grams, about $1.50 for a 10 gram glitter jar, and about 71 cents for the 12-color gift set. Dana wins the round: the cheapest gram is the one you actually use, so a one-color caramel business buys its one color in the 15 gram jar instead of eleven shades it will never open. Then: Amazon's business quantity ladder, and what to hand a caterer who asks what is in the sparkle.

In this episode:
- The weigh-the-jar method for cost per piece
- When the glitter goes on a caramel slab
- The per-gram board, and why the cheapest gram can be the expensive one
- Buying for a season: 5% off at 2 jars, up to 20% at 50
- What to tell a customer who asks what is in it

Who should skip it: caramels wrapped in opaque paper and eaten fast, one-pan-a-year makers, and batches you cannot glitter right after pouring.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing. Documentation requests go to the team through the contact page.

**Direct answer (top):** Weigh it. Weigh your glitter jar before and after one pan of caramels, divide the grams used by the roughly 100 pieces one recipe yields, and multiply by your price per gram, about $1.00 for a 15 gram luster dust jar at $14.99. Sprinkle the glitter right after pouring, while the caramel is hot and glossy, and buy the one color you actually use.

- 00:00 Cold open — 100 caramels, one pan
- 00:25 The verdict: weigh the jar, divide by 100
- 01:50 When the glitter goes on the slab
- 02:40 The per-gram board
- 03:30 Dana's round: the cheapest gram is the one you use
- 04:40 Buying for the season, and the practice pan
- 05:30 What's in the sparkle: the label, the listing, the supplier questions
- 06:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-homemade-caramels-what-it-costs-per-piece/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/43a1153b/0e856c41.mp3" length="6934650" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>432</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Everyone says the glitter costs pennies. Weigh the jar before and after one pan of 100 caramels and you have the real number.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Everyone says the glitter costs pennies. Weigh the jar before and after one pan of 100 caramels and you have the real number.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>homemade caramels, edible glitter caramels, holiday candy, caramel party favors, candy business, edible glitter cost, gold luster dust, wholesale edible glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/43a1153b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Homemade Marshmallows: Cut, Coat, Then Count Back</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>102</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Homemade Marshmallows: Cut, Coat, Then Count Back</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a7a3af0-67a5-45dc-897b-ef8c15d24be4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/316e9000</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on homemade marshmallows for holiday gift boxes? Right after cutting, and on one face only.

The recipe in this episode is a test-kitchen holiday marshmallow: syrup cooked to 240 degrees, beaten into gelatin for about 15 minutes until doubled, spread in a 13 by 9 pan and left to stand 6 hours or overnight, then cut into 1-inch squares and coated with garnishes. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains why a fresh cut face grabs glitter and why the same tackiness glues marshmallows together in a box. Dana wins the round: the powdered sugar or cornstarch that stops sticking would cover the sparkle, so glitter goes on the top face and the dust goes on the sides and bottom, top faces up, parchment between layers. Then the hosts build the countdown backwards from the hand-off day, inside the recipe's 3 to 4 week window, and do the box math on about 114 squares a pan.

In this episode:
- When to glitter: the minutes after cutting
- Dana's round: sparkle on top, dust on the sides
- The countdown from hand-off day
- Box math: 114 squares a pan
- Why the fridge is the wrong place for a gift box

Who should skip it: marshmallows meant for a mug of cocoa, bakers without cool, dry storage, and orders that want sparkle on every side.

MONÉGASQUE Silver Sparkle 10 gram glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put the glitter on right after cutting, while the cut faces are fresh and tacky. Glitter the top face only, dust the sides and bottom with powdered sugar or cornstarch so the squares do not stick together, and pack them top-up in an airtight container with parchment between layers. Keep them cool and dry, not in the fridge; one test-kitchen recipe gives about 3 to 4 weeks.

- 00:00 Cold open — 3 to 4 weeks and 20 gift boxes
- 00:25 The verdict: glitter after cutting
- 01:40 Sparkle Lab: why the cut face grabs
- 02:40 Dana's round: the dust covers the sparkle
- 04:00 The countdown from hand-off day
- 05:00 Box math: 114 squares a pan
- 05:50 No fridge · the listing's categories · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-homemade-marshmallows-cut-coat-then-count-back/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on homemade marshmallows for holiday gift boxes? Right after cutting, and on one face only.

The recipe in this episode is a test-kitchen holiday marshmallow: syrup cooked to 240 degrees, beaten into gelatin for about 15 minutes until doubled, spread in a 13 by 9 pan and left to stand 6 hours or overnight, then cut into 1-inch squares and coated with garnishes. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains why a fresh cut face grabs glitter and why the same tackiness glues marshmallows together in a box. Dana wins the round: the powdered sugar or cornstarch that stops sticking would cover the sparkle, so glitter goes on the top face and the dust goes on the sides and bottom, top faces up, parchment between layers. Then the hosts build the countdown backwards from the hand-off day, inside the recipe's 3 to 4 week window, and do the box math on about 114 squares a pan.

In this episode:
- When to glitter: the minutes after cutting
- Dana's round: sparkle on top, dust on the sides
- The countdown from hand-off day
- Box math: 114 squares a pan
- Why the fridge is the wrong place for a gift box

Who should skip it: marshmallows meant for a mug of cocoa, bakers without cool, dry storage, and orders that want sparkle on every side.

MONÉGASQUE Silver Sparkle 10 gram glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put the glitter on right after cutting, while the cut faces are fresh and tacky. Glitter the top face only, dust the sides and bottom with powdered sugar or cornstarch so the squares do not stick together, and pack them top-up in an airtight container with parchment between layers. Keep them cool and dry, not in the fridge; one test-kitchen recipe gives about 3 to 4 weeks.

- 00:00 Cold open — 3 to 4 weeks and 20 gift boxes
- 00:25 The verdict: glitter after cutting
- 01:40 Sparkle Lab: why the cut face grabs
- 02:40 Dana's round: the dust covers the sparkle
- 04:00 The countdown from hand-off day
- 05:00 Box math: 114 squares a pan
- 05:50 No fridge · the listing's categories · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-homemade-marshmallows-cut-coat-then-count-back/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/316e9000/7e9e5ffb.mp3" length="7350944" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>459</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The fresh cut face is where glitter sticks. Glitter the top, dust the sides, and count back from the day the gift boxes leave.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The fresh cut face is where glitter sticks. Glitter the top, dust the sides, and count back from the day the gift boxes leave.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>homemade marshmallows, edible glitter marshmallows, holiday gift boxes, Christmas candy, cottage bakery, edible glitter for treats, silver edible glitter, holiday baking</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/316e9000/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Jello Shots: How Many One Jar Covers</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>101</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>101</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Jello Shots: How Many One Jar Covers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81ff8a41-42e3-48fd-a345-b6d8117cd923</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bedc6de1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter do you need for jello shots? Far less than the videos suggest, and it costs about 15 cents a shot.

The recipe in this episode is a test-kitchen classic: each 3-ounce box of flavored gelatin makes about 12 shots, so 2 boxes make 2 dozen, with 1 cup of vodka and a ratio of 3 parts water to 1 part vodka. Pour into 2-ounce shot glasses and the shots set in about three hours. At the printed serving of 0.1 grams, 24 shots take 2.4 grams, so one 10 gram jar covers 4 batches, or 96 shots. The hosts disagree on where the glitter goes: Margaux loves the layered version, with a shimmer line between two set layers, and Dana wants one pour and a sprinkle on top. Dana wins the round, because each layer has to set completely and a New Year's Eve afternoon does not have 6 hours of fridge time to spare.

In this episode:
- The batch math: 24 shots, 2.4 grams, one jar for 96
- The recipe in 60 seconds, ratio included
- Layered shimmer line versus a sprinkle on top
- Making them ahead, and carrying them to a party
- Light colors and 80-proof spirits

Who should skip it: parties with kids (these are vodka shots), hosts using dark gelatin colors, and anyone starting a layered batch with 3 hours to go.

MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** About 0.1 grams a shot. One test-kitchen recipe makes 2 dozen jello shots from two 3-ounce boxes of gelatin, so a batch of 24 takes 2.4 grams and a 10 gram jar covers 96 shots, around 15 cents each. Make the shots at least three hours ahead so they set, then sprinkle the glitter on top just before serving.

- 00:00 Cold open — 96 shots from one jar
- 00:20 The verdict: 2.4 grams a batch, about 15 cents a shot
- 01:00 The recipe and the 3-to-1 ratio
- 01:40 Layered shimmer line or a sprinkle on top
- 02:20 Dana's round: two layers, two set times
- 03:00 Making ahead, lids for the car
- 03:40 Light colors, the listing's categories, 80-proof · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-jello-shots-how-many-one-jar-covers/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter do you need for jello shots? Far less than the videos suggest, and it costs about 15 cents a shot.

The recipe in this episode is a test-kitchen classic: each 3-ounce box of flavored gelatin makes about 12 shots, so 2 boxes make 2 dozen, with 1 cup of vodka and a ratio of 3 parts water to 1 part vodka. Pour into 2-ounce shot glasses and the shots set in about three hours. At the printed serving of 0.1 grams, 24 shots take 2.4 grams, so one 10 gram jar covers 4 batches, or 96 shots. The hosts disagree on where the glitter goes: Margaux loves the layered version, with a shimmer line between two set layers, and Dana wants one pour and a sprinkle on top. Dana wins the round, because each layer has to set completely and a New Year's Eve afternoon does not have 6 hours of fridge time to spare.

In this episode:
- The batch math: 24 shots, 2.4 grams, one jar for 96
- The recipe in 60 seconds, ratio included
- Layered shimmer line versus a sprinkle on top
- Making them ahead, and carrying them to a party
- Light colors and 80-proof spirits

Who should skip it: parties with kids (these are vodka shots), hosts using dark gelatin colors, and anyone starting a layered batch with 3 hours to go.

MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** About 0.1 grams a shot. One test-kitchen recipe makes 2 dozen jello shots from two 3-ounce boxes of gelatin, so a batch of 24 takes 2.4 grams and a 10 gram jar covers 96 shots, around 15 cents each. Make the shots at least three hours ahead so they set, then sprinkle the glitter on top just before serving.

- 00:00 Cold open — 96 shots from one jar
- 00:20 The verdict: 2.4 grams a batch, about 15 cents a shot
- 01:00 The recipe and the 3-to-1 ratio
- 01:40 Layered shimmer line or a sprinkle on top
- 02:20 Dana's round: two layers, two set times
- 03:00 Making ahead, lids for the car
- 03:40 Light colors, the listing's categories, 80-proof · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-jello-shots-how-many-one-jar-covers/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bedc6de1/a9b492a6.mp3" length="5014954" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>313</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Glitter jello shots look pricey. The math says about 15 cents a shot, and the real deadline is the 3 hours the gelatin needs to set.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Glitter jello shots look pricey. The math says about 15 cents a shot, and the real deadline is the 3 hours the gelatin needs to set.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter jello shots, jello shots, New Year's Eve party, glitter shots, edible glitter for drinks, party shots, iridescent edible glitter, NYE party ideas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bedc6de1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter in a Hot Toddy: Stir the Honey First</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>100</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter in a Hot Toddy: Stir the Honey First</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69c01f10-29a9-4589-8517-8bf62a7d8397</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/58a563a5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in a hot toddy? Yes, and the timing matters more than the heat.

The toddy in this episode is a classic from a recipe site: 3/4 cup hot water, 1 1/2 ounces whiskey, 2 teaspoons fresh lemon juice and 2 teaspoons honey, stirred in a mug until the honey dissolves. Taste it, adjust it, and only then add a pinch of edible glitter with one last stir. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains why sugar and honey vanish in hot water while shimmer pigment does not: safety data sheets describe it as almost insoluble in water and chemically stable, so the heat leaves it alone. The hosts disagree on flake versus dust for a drink you hold for 20 minutes, and settle on a side-by-side test. Dana wins the round on the garnish: the recipe's cinnamon stick is a built-in stirrer, so every turn brings the swirl back.

In this episode:
- When the glitter goes in, and why the honey goes first
- Why hot water does not dissolve shimmer pigment
- How much to use in a 3/4-cup drink
- Why a clear glass mug is half the effect
- Dana's round: the cinnamon stick is the stirrer

Who should skip it: hosts with only ceramic mugs, anyone glittering a tea, coffee or cocoa with no spirit in it, and toddy purists.

MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Yes. Build the hot toddy first: 3/4 cup hot water, 1 1/2 ounces whiskey, 2 teaspoons lemon juice and 2 teaspoons honey, stirred until the honey dissolves. Taste and adjust, then add a pinch of edible glitter, about 0.1 grams, and give it one last stir in a clear glass mug. Shimmer pigment is almost insoluble in water, so the heat does not dissolve it. Leave the cinnamon stick in as a stirrer.

- 00:00 Cold open — the 2 minutes in the recipe
- 00:25 The verdict: honey first, glitter last
- 01:40 Sparkle Lab: why hot water leaves the pigment alone
- 02:40 Flake or dust for a drink you hold
- 03:30 How much in a 3/4-cup drink, and why clear glass
- 04:30 Is a hot cocktail a glitter drink? The beverage entry
- 05:30 Dana's round: the cinnamon stick
- 06:40 Making 4 at once · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-in-a-hot-toddy-stir-the-honey-first/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in a hot toddy? Yes, and the timing matters more than the heat.

The toddy in this episode is a classic from a recipe site: 3/4 cup hot water, 1 1/2 ounces whiskey, 2 teaspoons fresh lemon juice and 2 teaspoons honey, stirred in a mug until the honey dissolves. Taste it, adjust it, and only then add a pinch of edible glitter with one last stir. In the Sparkle Lab, Margaux explains why sugar and honey vanish in hot water while shimmer pigment does not: safety data sheets describe it as almost insoluble in water and chemically stable, so the heat leaves it alone. The hosts disagree on flake versus dust for a drink you hold for 20 minutes, and settle on a side-by-side test. Dana wins the round on the garnish: the recipe's cinnamon stick is a built-in stirrer, so every turn brings the swirl back.

In this episode:
- When the glitter goes in, and why the honey goes first
- Why hot water does not dissolve shimmer pigment
- How much to use in a 3/4-cup drink
- Why a clear glass mug is half the effect
- Dana's round: the cinnamon stick is the stirrer

Who should skip it: hosts with only ceramic mugs, anyone glittering a tea, coffee or cocoa with no spirit in it, and toddy purists.

MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Yes. Build the hot toddy first: 3/4 cup hot water, 1 1/2 ounces whiskey, 2 teaspoons lemon juice and 2 teaspoons honey, stirred until the honey dissolves. Taste and adjust, then add a pinch of edible glitter, about 0.1 grams, and give it one last stir in a clear glass mug. Shimmer pigment is almost insoluble in water, so the heat does not dissolve it. Leave the cinnamon stick in as a stirrer.

- 00:00 Cold open — the 2 minutes in the recipe
- 00:25 The verdict: honey first, glitter last
- 01:40 Sparkle Lab: why hot water leaves the pigment alone
- 02:40 Flake or dust for a drink you hold
- 03:30 How much in a 3/4-cup drink, and why clear glass
- 04:30 Is a hot cocktail a glitter drink? The beverage entry
- 05:30 Dana's round: the cinnamon stick
- 06:40 Making 4 at once · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-in-a-hot-toddy-stir-the-honey-first/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/58a563a5/867ea936.mp3" length="7869615" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>491</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A hot drink sounds like trouble for glitter. It isn't: stir the honey in first, add the pinch last, and serve it in a clear glass mug.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A hot drink sounds like trouble for glitter. It isn't: stir the honey in first, add the pinch last, and serve it in a clear glass mug.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>hot toddy, edible glitter hot toddy, edible glitter for drinks, warm cocktails, whiskey cocktail, holiday cocktails, gold edible glitter, winter drinks</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/58a563a5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Christmas Fudge: Start With the Label on the Jar</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>99</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>99</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Christmas Fudge: Start With the Label on the Jar</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6b36a77-6b8a-4188-816b-53c6eb5cf526</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/be79216a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter on Christmas fudge, and what does the label need to say? Yes — and the label starts with the glitter jar, not your tin.

The fudge part is quick: a no-thermometer recipe boils sugar and evaporated milk 9 minutes, then, working quickly before the fudge cools, pours it and sprinkles the toppings. FDA's advice to bakers is that companies making edible glitters and dusts are required by law to list ingredients on the label, and that a product labeled only "non-toxic" or "for decorative purposes only," with no ingredient list, should not be used directly on food. The Sparkle Lab revisits the CDC's report on a 2018 Rhode Island birthday cake whose rose gold dust was labeled "nonedible," "nontoxic" and "for decoration only." Then the labeling rule in 21 CFR 101.22(k): certified color additives are declared by name, and exempt ones may be declared as "Color Added" or by name. Dana wins the round that "edible" is just a word too: an ingredient list is a first screening check, not proof, so a business asks its supplier in writing for the specification, the label declaration and a statement naming the intended food categories.

In this episode:
- When glitter goes on fudge, and counter versus fridge
- Sparkle Lab: why "non-toxic" is not "edible"
- What goes on your tin's label
- Dana's round: the list is the first check, not proof
- The three documents a bakery asks for

Who should skip it: anyone whose only shimmer is a jar with no ingredient list, and tins headed into the mail.

MONÉGASQUE Bronze 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Yes. Sprinkle edible glitter on fudge while it is still hot, before it cools. Before that, check the glitter jar: FDA says companies making edible glitters and dusts are required by law to list ingredients, and a product labeled only "non-toxic" or "for decorative purposes only," with no ingredient list, should not be used directly on food. If your fudge tin has an ingredient label, fill the glitter line from the jar's own list.

- 00:00 Cold open — a "non-toxic" jar and 40 tins
- 00:25 The verdict: hot fudge, and the jar's label first
- 01:40 The fudge: 9 minutes, then work fast
- 02:20 Counter or fridge — the split
- 03:30 Sparkle Lab: non-toxic is not edible
- 04:50 What goes on your label: 21 CFR 101.22(k)
- 05:40 Dana's round: edible is a word too
- 06:30 The three documents a bakery asks for
- 07:20 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-christmas-fudge-start-with-the-label-on-the-jar/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter on Christmas fudge, and what does the label need to say? Yes — and the label starts with the glitter jar, not your tin.

The fudge part is quick: a no-thermometer recipe boils sugar and evaporated milk 9 minutes, then, working quickly before the fudge cools, pours it and sprinkles the toppings. FDA's advice to bakers is that companies making edible glitters and dusts are required by law to list ingredients on the label, and that a product labeled only "non-toxic" or "for decorative purposes only," with no ingredient list, should not be used directly on food. The Sparkle Lab revisits the CDC's report on a 2018 Rhode Island birthday cake whose rose gold dust was labeled "nonedible," "nontoxic" and "for decoration only." Then the labeling rule in 21 CFR 101.22(k): certified color additives are declared by name, and exempt ones may be declared as "Color Added" or by name. Dana wins the round that "edible" is just a word too: an ingredient list is a first screening check, not proof, so a business asks its supplier in writing for the specification, the label declaration and a statement naming the intended food categories.

In this episode:
- When glitter goes on fudge, and counter versus fridge
- Sparkle Lab: why "non-toxic" is not "edible"
- What goes on your tin's label
- Dana's round: the list is the first check, not proof
- The three documents a bakery asks for

Who should skip it: anyone whose only shimmer is a jar with no ingredient list, and tins headed into the mail.

MONÉGASQUE Bronze 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Yes. Sprinkle edible glitter on fudge while it is still hot, before it cools. Before that, check the glitter jar: FDA says companies making edible glitters and dusts are required by law to list ingredients, and a product labeled only "non-toxic" or "for decorative purposes only," with no ingredient list, should not be used directly on food. If your fudge tin has an ingredient label, fill the glitter line from the jar's own list.

- 00:00 Cold open — a "non-toxic" jar and 40 tins
- 00:25 The verdict: hot fudge, and the jar's label first
- 01:40 The fudge: 9 minutes, then work fast
- 02:20 Counter or fridge — the split
- 03:30 Sparkle Lab: non-toxic is not edible
- 04:50 What goes on your label: 21 CFR 101.22(k)
- 05:40 Dana's round: edible is a word too
- 06:30 The three documents a bakery asks for
- 07:20 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-christmas-fudge-start-with-the-label-on-the-jar/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/be79216a/89809a3e.mp3" length="7855001" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>490</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>"Non-toxic" with no ingredient list isn't the edible kind. Glitter the fudge while it's hot, and fill your tin's label from the jar's.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>"Non-toxic" with no ingredient list isn't the edible kind. Glitter the fudge while it's hot, and fill your tin's label from the jar's.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter Christmas fudge, fudge label ingredients, non-toxic vs edible glitter, cottage bakery labeling, holiday fudge tins, color additive label rules, FDA edible glitter advisory, bronze luster dust</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/be79216a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Chocolate Covered Pretzels: What a Batch Costs</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>98</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Chocolate Covered Pretzels: What a Batch Costs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be595e20-24c2-4f06-abb5-2ef2f5e68da2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/78802b04</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What does edible glitter on chocolate covered pretzels actually cost? Pennies a bag — and the 3 to 5 days matter far more.

The recipe in this episode dips 108 mini pretzels in 10 ounces each of dark and vanilla melting wafers, adds 6 ounces of sprinkles while the chocolate is still warm, sets them at least 20 minutes, counts 13 pretzels as a serving, and stores them sealed for three to five days. That makes 8 bags a batch. To price the glitter, weigh the jar before and after the first batch, multiply by the price per gram, and divide by 8. On the board, 15 gram luster dust at $14.99 is about $1.00 a gram, 7 gram about $1.43, and 10 gram drink glitter about $1.50, with Amazon business pricing from 5 percent off at 2 units up to 20 percent off at 50. The glitter goes on with the sprinkles, right after the fork, while the chocolate is warm. Dana wins the round that the glitter is a rounding error next to the chocolate and sprinkles, so the real math is batch size against what sells inside 3 to 5 days.

In this episode:
- One batch: 108 pretzels, 8 bags of 13
- When the glitter goes on, and why warm matters
- The weigh-the-jar method and the per-gram board
- Dana's round: the glitter is a rounding error
- Why the shelf window decides the batch

Who should skip it: anyone who cannot sell a batch inside 3 to 5 days, and bags headed for a sunny window display.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Edible glitter is the cheapest line on a chocolate-pretzel recipe. One recipe makes 108 mini pretzels, or 8 bags of 13, stored sealed for 3 to 5 days. Weigh the glitter jar before and after the first batch, multiply by the price per gram, and divide by 8 to get the cost per bag. Add the glitter with the sprinkles while the chocolate is still warm, and size batches to what sells in 3 to 5 days.

- 00:00 Cold open — a café owner's first question
- 00:25 The verdict: the 3 to 5 days, not the pinch
- 01:30 Weigh the jar, and the per-gram board
- 02:30 Glitter on warm chocolate
- 02:50 Dana's round: the glitter is a rounding error
- 03:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-chocolate-covered-pretzels-what-a-batch-costs/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What does edible glitter on chocolate covered pretzels actually cost? Pennies a bag — and the 3 to 5 days matter far more.

The recipe in this episode dips 108 mini pretzels in 10 ounces each of dark and vanilla melting wafers, adds 6 ounces of sprinkles while the chocolate is still warm, sets them at least 20 minutes, counts 13 pretzels as a serving, and stores them sealed for three to five days. That makes 8 bags a batch. To price the glitter, weigh the jar before and after the first batch, multiply by the price per gram, and divide by 8. On the board, 15 gram luster dust at $14.99 is about $1.00 a gram, 7 gram about $1.43, and 10 gram drink glitter about $1.50, with Amazon business pricing from 5 percent off at 2 units up to 20 percent off at 50. The glitter goes on with the sprinkles, right after the fork, while the chocolate is warm. Dana wins the round that the glitter is a rounding error next to the chocolate and sprinkles, so the real math is batch size against what sells inside 3 to 5 days.

In this episode:
- One batch: 108 pretzels, 8 bags of 13
- When the glitter goes on, and why warm matters
- The weigh-the-jar method and the per-gram board
- Dana's round: the glitter is a rounding error
- Why the shelf window decides the batch

Who should skip it: anyone who cannot sell a batch inside 3 to 5 days, and bags headed for a sunny window display.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Edible glitter is the cheapest line on a chocolate-pretzel recipe. One recipe makes 108 mini pretzels, or 8 bags of 13, stored sealed for 3 to 5 days. Weigh the glitter jar before and after the first batch, multiply by the price per gram, and divide by 8 to get the cost per bag. Add the glitter with the sprinkles while the chocolate is still warm, and size batches to what sells in 3 to 5 days.

- 00:00 Cold open — a café owner's first question
- 00:25 The verdict: the 3 to 5 days, not the pinch
- 01:30 Weigh the jar, and the per-gram board
- 02:30 Glitter on warm chocolate
- 02:50 Dana's round: the glitter is a rounding error
- 03:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-chocolate-covered-pretzels-what-a-batch-costs/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/78802b04/7b9f25ac.mp3" length="4589902" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>286</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The glitter is the cheapest line on the card. The number that makes or loses money on a pretzel bag is the 3 to 5 days.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The glitter is the cheapest line on the card. The number that makes or loses money on a pretzel bag is the 3 to 5 days.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter chocolate covered pretzels, holiday pretzel bags, café holiday treats, chocolate pretzel recipe cost, edible glitter price per gram, gold luster dust chocolate, Christmas treat bags, bakery holiday pricing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/78802b04/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snow Globe Cocktail With Edible Glitter: Shake It In, Freeze the Glass</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>97</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>97</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Snow Globe Cocktail With Edible Glitter: Shake It In, Freeze the Glass</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c8c5422-3437-4e20-a8ec-b02af19d49b7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/46292807</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you make a snow globe cocktail with edible glitter? The glitter goes in the shaker, and the glass needs a day's head start.

The version in this episode is a rosemary vodka collins from a cocktail blog: 2 ounces vodka, 3/4 ounce rosemary syrup, 1/2 ounce lemon juice and a dash of edible glitter shaken with ice, then 4 ounces of club soda, strained into the glass. The snow globe is the glass itself — a clear stemless wine glass with coconut and cranberries covering the bottom, about an inch of water and a rosemary sprig, frozen about 6 hours. Sparkle Lab explains why shaking spreads the glitter through the drink before the soda goes in, and why white or silver flake at 50 to 500 microns reads as falling snow where fine dust reads as a silky swirl. The hosts argue over eyeballing a dash versus weighing 0.1 grams once. Dana wins the freezer round: nobody fits 12 frozen wine glasses in a home freezer, so make two or three globe glasses for the reveal and pour the same shaken cocktail into plain clear glasses for everyone else.

In this episode:
- Where the glitter goes: shaker, then soda, then strain
- Flake for snow, and why clear matters
- How much is a dash
- Dana's round: globe glasses for the reveal, clear glasses for the rest
- Why this show builds the cocktail version

Who should skip it: dark, red or creamy party cocktails, anyone without a free freezer shelf for a day, and mostly non-drinking crowds.

MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Shake the edible glitter with the vodka, rosemary syrup, lemon juice and ice, add club soda, and strain into a "snow globe" glass: a clear stemless wine glass with coconut, cranberries, about an inch of water and a rosemary sprig frozen about 6 hours ahead. Use white or silver flake so it reads as snow, start at the printed 0.1 grams, and make the glasses the day before.

- 00:00 Cold open — the 6 hours nobody mentions
- 00:25 The verdict: glitter in the shaker, globe in the glass
- 01:50 Sparkle Lab: why shake it in
- 02:40 Flake for snow, and why clear matters
- 03:40 How much is a dash
- 04:40 The cocktail, and the listing's beverage entry
- 05:30 Dana's round: my freezer holds peas
- 06:40 Rosemary syrup · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/snow-globe-cocktail-with-edible-glitter-shake-it-in-freeze-the-glass/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you make a snow globe cocktail with edible glitter? The glitter goes in the shaker, and the glass needs a day's head start.

The version in this episode is a rosemary vodka collins from a cocktail blog: 2 ounces vodka, 3/4 ounce rosemary syrup, 1/2 ounce lemon juice and a dash of edible glitter shaken with ice, then 4 ounces of club soda, strained into the glass. The snow globe is the glass itself — a clear stemless wine glass with coconut and cranberries covering the bottom, about an inch of water and a rosemary sprig, frozen about 6 hours. Sparkle Lab explains why shaking spreads the glitter through the drink before the soda goes in, and why white or silver flake at 50 to 500 microns reads as falling snow where fine dust reads as a silky swirl. The hosts argue over eyeballing a dash versus weighing 0.1 grams once. Dana wins the freezer round: nobody fits 12 frozen wine glasses in a home freezer, so make two or three globe glasses for the reveal and pour the same shaken cocktail into plain clear glasses for everyone else.

In this episode:
- Where the glitter goes: shaker, then soda, then strain
- Flake for snow, and why clear matters
- How much is a dash
- Dana's round: globe glasses for the reveal, clear glasses for the rest
- Why this show builds the cocktail version

Who should skip it: dark, red or creamy party cocktails, anyone without a free freezer shelf for a day, and mostly non-drinking crowds.

MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Shake the edible glitter with the vodka, rosemary syrup, lemon juice and ice, add club soda, and strain into a "snow globe" glass: a clear stemless wine glass with coconut, cranberries, about an inch of water and a rosemary sprig frozen about 6 hours ahead. Use white or silver flake so it reads as snow, start at the printed 0.1 grams, and make the glasses the day before.

- 00:00 Cold open — the 6 hours nobody mentions
- 00:25 The verdict: glitter in the shaker, globe in the glass
- 01:50 Sparkle Lab: why shake it in
- 02:40 Flake for snow, and why clear matters
- 03:40 How much is a dash
- 04:40 The cocktail, and the listing's beverage entry
- 05:30 Dana's round: my freezer holds peas
- 06:40 Rosemary syrup · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/snow-globe-cocktail-with-edible-glitter-shake-it-in-freeze-the-glass/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/46292807/790a142d.mp3" length="7181254" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>448</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The glitter makes the snow and the glass makes the globe. Shake it in with the ice, and give the glass 6 hours in the freezer.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The glitter makes the snow and the glass makes the globe. Shake it in with the ice, and give the glass 6 hours in the freezer.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>snow globe cocktail, edible glitter cocktail, rosemary vodka collins, holiday signature cocktail, edible glitter for drinks, Christmas party drinks, white edible glitter, glitter cocktail recipe</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/46292807/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Candy Apples: In the Candy, Then 10 Seconds</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>96</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Candy Apples: In the Candy, Then 10 Seconds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb3f50f8-38dc-47e1-86f0-c56417e1ed63</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/16884bfb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you get edible glitter on candy apples? In two places, and the second one gives you about 10 seconds.

A candy-apple recipe cooks the sugar to 300 degrees Fahrenheit, the hard crack stage, takes it off the heat, and swirls in the color and edible glitter gently rather than stirring hard. It dips at about 280 degrees, lets each apple drip about 5 seconds, then rolls the bottom half in a bowl of glitter — with about 10 seconds before the shell firms. With Halloween 9 days out, the episode lays out the countdown: a candy thermometer and the glitter this week, wax off the apples the night before, dip the morning of the party. Sparkle Lab covers why a 300-degree pan is no problem for a mineral pigment whose data sheet lists a component melting point near 3,000 degrees Celsius, and why flake shows inside a clear shell while dust turns it pearly. Dana wins the round on timing: the recipe says candy apples are best the day they are made and keep about 24 hours in cellophane, and sugar pulls moisture from humid air, so a Thursday batch for a Saturday party is a sticky one.

In this episode:
- The two moments: in the candy, and the 10-second roll
- The 9-day countdown, including the wax
- Sparkle Lab: 300 degrees and a mineral pigment
- Flake or dust in a glassy shell
- Dana's round: candy apples are a same-day job

Who should skip it: anyone without a candy thermometer, anyone who needs them made 2 days early, and humid outdoor parties.

MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put edible glitter on candy apples in two places. Swirl flake into the candy off the heat once it reaches 300 degrees Fahrenheit, and dip at about 280. Then let each apple drip about 5 seconds and roll the bottom half in a bowl of glitter right away — one recipe gives you about 10 seconds before the shell firms. Make them the day you serve them, and keep them out of the fridge.

- 00:00 Cold open — 12 apples, 10 seconds
- 00:20 The verdict: in the candy, then on the bottom
- 01:40 The countdown: thermometer, wax, dip day
- 03:00 Why the wax matters for the glitter
- 03:40 Sparkle Lab: 300 degrees and a mineral pigment
- 04:30 Flake or dust in a clear shell
- 05:20 Is candy a place glitter belongs?
- 06:00 Dana's round: best the day they're made
- 07:20 Cost for 12 · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-candy-apples-in-the-candy-then-10-seconds/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you get edible glitter on candy apples? In two places, and the second one gives you about 10 seconds.

A candy-apple recipe cooks the sugar to 300 degrees Fahrenheit, the hard crack stage, takes it off the heat, and swirls in the color and edible glitter gently rather than stirring hard. It dips at about 280 degrees, lets each apple drip about 5 seconds, then rolls the bottom half in a bowl of glitter — with about 10 seconds before the shell firms. With Halloween 9 days out, the episode lays out the countdown: a candy thermometer and the glitter this week, wax off the apples the night before, dip the morning of the party. Sparkle Lab covers why a 300-degree pan is no problem for a mineral pigment whose data sheet lists a component melting point near 3,000 degrees Celsius, and why flake shows inside a clear shell while dust turns it pearly. Dana wins the round on timing: the recipe says candy apples are best the day they are made and keep about 24 hours in cellophane, and sugar pulls moisture from humid air, so a Thursday batch for a Saturday party is a sticky one.

In this episode:
- The two moments: in the candy, and the 10-second roll
- The 9-day countdown, including the wax
- Sparkle Lab: 300 degrees and a mineral pigment
- Flake or dust in a glassy shell
- Dana's round: candy apples are a same-day job

Who should skip it: anyone without a candy thermometer, anyone who needs them made 2 days early, and humid outdoor parties.

MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Put edible glitter on candy apples in two places. Swirl flake into the candy off the heat once it reaches 300 degrees Fahrenheit, and dip at about 280. Then let each apple drip about 5 seconds and roll the bottom half in a bowl of glitter right away — one recipe gives you about 10 seconds before the shell firms. Make them the day you serve them, and keep them out of the fridge.

- 00:00 Cold open — 12 apples, 10 seconds
- 00:20 The verdict: in the candy, then on the bottom
- 01:40 The countdown: thermometer, wax, dip day
- 03:00 Why the wax matters for the glitter
- 03:40 Sparkle Lab: 300 degrees and a mineral pigment
- 04:30 Flake or dust in a clear shell
- 05:20 Is candy a place glitter belongs?
- 06:00 Dana's round: best the day they're made
- 07:20 Cost for 12 · who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-candy-apples-in-the-candy-then-10-seconds/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/16884bfb/9ade1e88.mp3" length="7368909" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>460</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The shell sets in about 10 seconds, so the glitter bowl lives next to the pan. Swirl it in off the heat, then roll the bottom fast.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The shell sets in about 10 seconds, so the glitter bowl lives next to the pan. Swirl it in off the heat, then roll the bottom fast.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter candy apples, Halloween candy apples, glitter poison apples, how to make candy apples, hard crack candy, candy apple decorating, Halloween party treats, iridescent edible glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/16884bfb/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Much Edible Glitter for a New Year's Eve Party? The Jar Math</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>95</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>95</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How Much Edible Glitter for a New Year's Eve Party? The Jar Math</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6520d731-1d28-4f32-b408-8ef3e97502f2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/dc566df8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter do you need for a New Year's Eve party? Fewer jars than you think, once you count the right drinks.

A common hosting formula plans 2 drinks per guest in the first hour and 1 per guest each hour after, so 30 guests over 4 hours pour about 150 drinks. At the printed 0.1 grams a drink, glittering every one would take 15 grams — exactly one 15 gram jar, with nothing spare. Put the shimmer only in a signature cocktail that makes up about 1 drink in 3, and it is 50 drinks and 5 grams, leaving about 100 servings in the jar. The 15 gram jar works out to about 10 cents a drink; the 10 gram jar about 15 cents. Dana wins the round on the headline number: 150 drinks against 150 servings is a coin toss, so the menu, not a second jar, becomes the cushion. The episode also explains why the shimmer goes into the cocktail round before midnight rather than a straight Champagne toast: the pigment's beverage entry in 21 CFR 73.350 names cocktails, not wine.

In this episode:
- The party formula, and why you count shimmer drinks only
- Per-drink cost: 15 gram versus 10 gram
- Sparkle Lab: why the glitter moment is the signature cocktail
- Dana's round: exactly is a trap
- What overbuying costs you in January

Who should skip it: beer-and-wine parties, fixed wine-pairing dinners, and hosts who won't measure even once.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Count the shimmer drinks, not the whole party. A hosting formula of 2 drinks per guest in the first hour and 1 per guest after puts a 30-guest, 4-hour party at about 150 drinks — 15 grams at 0.1 grams a drink, exactly one 15 gram jar. Glitter only a signature cocktail that is about 1 drink in 3, and you need 5 grams, leaving about 100 servings spare.

- 00:00 Cold open — 150 drinks, 150 servings
- 00:30 The verdict: count the shimmer drinks
- 02:00 Per-drink cost, and smaller and bigger parties
- 03:30 Sparkle Lab: the toast versus the cocktail
- 05:00 Dana's round: exactly is a trap
- 06:10 Half a jar in January
- 06:50 Measuring 0.1 grams, and doubling it
- 07:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/how-much-edible-glitter-for-a-new-years-eve-party-the-jar-math/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter do you need for a New Year's Eve party? Fewer jars than you think, once you count the right drinks.

A common hosting formula plans 2 drinks per guest in the first hour and 1 per guest each hour after, so 30 guests over 4 hours pour about 150 drinks. At the printed 0.1 grams a drink, glittering every one would take 15 grams — exactly one 15 gram jar, with nothing spare. Put the shimmer only in a signature cocktail that makes up about 1 drink in 3, and it is 50 drinks and 5 grams, leaving about 100 servings in the jar. The 15 gram jar works out to about 10 cents a drink; the 10 gram jar about 15 cents. Dana wins the round on the headline number: 150 drinks against 150 servings is a coin toss, so the menu, not a second jar, becomes the cushion. The episode also explains why the shimmer goes into the cocktail round before midnight rather than a straight Champagne toast: the pigment's beverage entry in 21 CFR 73.350 names cocktails, not wine.

In this episode:
- The party formula, and why you count shimmer drinks only
- Per-drink cost: 15 gram versus 10 gram
- Sparkle Lab: why the glitter moment is the signature cocktail
- Dana's round: exactly is a trap
- What overbuying costs you in January

Who should skip it: beer-and-wine parties, fixed wine-pairing dinners, and hosts who won't measure even once.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Count the shimmer drinks, not the whole party. A hosting formula of 2 drinks per guest in the first hour and 1 per guest after puts a 30-guest, 4-hour party at about 150 drinks — 15 grams at 0.1 grams a drink, exactly one 15 gram jar. Glitter only a signature cocktail that is about 1 drink in 3, and you need 5 grams, leaving about 100 servings spare.

- 00:00 Cold open — 150 drinks, 150 servings
- 00:30 The verdict: count the shimmer drinks
- 02:00 Per-drink cost, and smaller and bigger parties
- 03:30 Sparkle Lab: the toast versus the cocktail
- 05:00 Dana's round: exactly is a trap
- 06:10 Half a jar in January
- 06:50 Measuring 0.1 grams, and doubling it
- 07:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/how-much-edible-glitter-for-a-new-years-eve-party-the-jar-math/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/dc566df8/c0a53831.mp3" length="8260001" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>515</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>30 guests pour about 150 drinks by midnight. Count the shimmer drinks, not the party, and one jar covers it with room to spare.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>30 guests pour about 150 drinks by midnight. Count the shimmer drinks, not the party, and one jar covers it with room to spare.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how much edible glitter for a party, New Year's Eve cocktails, edible glitter per drink, party drink calculator, signature cocktail shimmer, edible glitter cost per drink, NYE party planning, gold luster dust drinks</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/dc566df8/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Chocolate Truffles: Roll It While It's Warm</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>94</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Chocolate Truffles: Roll It While It's Warm</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">281684ac-e2ea-49ff-9744-08ba984f7736</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d9e59d5d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you get edible glitter to stick to chocolate truffles? Roll one in your palms, then straight into the glitter.

One truffle recipe notes that the heat of your hands slightly softens the truffle as you roll it, then rolls the softened truffle in its topping. That softened surface is the window. Roll a whole tray first and glitter later, and the early truffles have firmed up and hold almost nothing. Luster dust at 5 to 25 microns coats a warm truffle into a solid gilded ball, the classic gift-box look; flake at 50 to 500 microns gives a light frost. Dana wins the round about the second recipe's ice-bag trick for hot hands: cooling your palms fights the very tackiness that holds the glitter, so the ice becomes a reset after each glittered truffle, never before. Then box them cold and open the box once, because refrigerated chocolate carries condensation that ruins a dusted finish.

In this episode:
- Why your palms are the adhesive, and the one-at-a-time order
- Dust for a gilded coat, flake for frost
- Soft-clay ganache, not rock-hard
- Dana's round: the ice bag comes after the glitter
- Storing a glittered truffle box

Who should skip it: truffles rolled in cocoa (a dry coating holds nothing) and truffle boxes going in the mail.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Roll each truffle between your palms and drop it straight into the glitter, one at a time. A truffle recipe notes the heat of your hands slightly softens the truffle as you roll, and that softened surface is what holds the glitter; a firm, dry surface holds very little. Use luster dust for a solid gilded coat or a light pinch of flake for frost, and cool your hands on an ice bag after each glittered truffle, not before.

- 00:00 Cold open — 24 truffles, half bald
- 00:20 The verdict: palms, then glitter, one at a time
- 01:20 Sparkle Lab: dust or flake
- 02:10 Soft-clay ganache
- 02:40 Dana's round: the ice bag
- 03:40 Storing the box · who should skip it
- 04:30 Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-chocolate-truffles-roll-it-while-its-warm/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you get edible glitter to stick to chocolate truffles? Roll one in your palms, then straight into the glitter.

One truffle recipe notes that the heat of your hands slightly softens the truffle as you roll it, then rolls the softened truffle in its topping. That softened surface is the window. Roll a whole tray first and glitter later, and the early truffles have firmed up and hold almost nothing. Luster dust at 5 to 25 microns coats a warm truffle into a solid gilded ball, the classic gift-box look; flake at 50 to 500 microns gives a light frost. Dana wins the round about the second recipe's ice-bag trick for hot hands: cooling your palms fights the very tackiness that holds the glitter, so the ice becomes a reset after each glittered truffle, never before. Then box them cold and open the box once, because refrigerated chocolate carries condensation that ruins a dusted finish.

In this episode:
- Why your palms are the adhesive, and the one-at-a-time order
- Dust for a gilded coat, flake for frost
- Soft-clay ganache, not rock-hard
- Dana's round: the ice bag comes after the glitter
- Storing a glittered truffle box

Who should skip it: truffles rolled in cocoa (a dry coating holds nothing) and truffle boxes going in the mail.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

**Direct answer (top):** Roll each truffle between your palms and drop it straight into the glitter, one at a time. A truffle recipe notes the heat of your hands slightly softens the truffle as you roll, and that softened surface is what holds the glitter; a firm, dry surface holds very little. Use luster dust for a solid gilded coat or a light pinch of flake for frost, and cool your hands on an ice bag after each glittered truffle, not before.

- 00:00 Cold open — 24 truffles, half bald
- 00:20 The verdict: palms, then glitter, one at a time
- 01:20 Sparkle Lab: dust or flake
- 02:10 Soft-clay ganache
- 02:40 Dana's round: the ice bag
- 03:40 Storing the box · who should skip it
- 04:30 Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript: https://monegasque.transistor.fm/episodes/edible-glitter-on-chocolate-truffles-roll-it-while-its-warm/transcript. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d9e59d5d/8c8868d9.mp3" length="4963136" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>309</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Half the glitter fell off because the truffles cooled first. Your warm palms are the glue — roll one, glitter it, then the next.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Half the glitter fell off because the truffles cooled first. Your warm palms are the glue — roll one, glitter it, then the next.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter chocolate truffles, gold luster dust truffles, how to decorate truffles, holiday truffle gift box, rolling truffles, chocolate truffle coating, Christmas candy gifts, luster dust on chocolate</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d9e59d5d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on a Yule Log: Before the Fridge, Not After</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>93</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>93</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on a Yule Log: Before the Fridge, Not After</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89cae08a-2661-47f0-8634-b4ca98e8c574</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8fb9aaec</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When do you put edible glitter on a yule log — before the fridge, or after? Before, and the recipe hands you the exact moment.

A yule log recipe frosts the cake in whipped ganache, drags a knife through it for bark ridges, presses in the meringue mushrooms and sugared cranberries, covers it with an inverted container, refrigerates it for up to 2 days, and rests it 20 to 30 minutes before serving so the ganache softens. The shimmer goes on the ridge tops right after the knife, while the ganache is soft enough to take a dry brush; then the log goes cold under its dome. Dusting after the fridge means dusting onto condensation, which the chocolate guides say ruins a dusted finish — that is what happened to the bakery that glittered forty logs on pickup morning. Gold or bronze dust reads on chocolate because the gold luster dust carries iron oxide at 14 to 19 percent, a warm pigment with its own shadow; flake belongs only in the troughs as frost. Dana wins the round about the customer's counter: the recipe's rest sweats the log anyway, and the honest answer is that the pigment stays put, the exact look after 30 minutes is unmeasured, and the resting instruction goes on the box.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: why the ridge tops, not the whole log
- Gold and bronze on chocolate, dust over flake
- The 2-day fridge ceiling as a production schedule for forty logs
- Dana's round: the customer's counter, conceded properly
- Which jar for a season of logs

Who should skip it: logs going out in a warm delivery van, dark-on-dark rustic logs, and logs where the mushrooms are the story.

MONÉGASQUE Bronze 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Glitter a yule log before it goes in the fridge, never after. Dry-brush luster dust along the bark ridges right after the knife, while the whipped ganache is soft, then press in the decorations, cover with an inverted container and refrigerate — the recipe allows up to 2 days. A cold log taken out and dusted sweats, and condensation ruins a dusted finish. Use gold or bronze on chocolate; save flake for frost in the troughs.

- 00:00 Cold open — forty logs, forty phone calls
- 00:30 The verdict: brush before bowl
- 01:30 Sparkle Lab: why the ridges
- 02:30 Dust or flake, gold or silver, on chocolate
- 03:30 The soft-ganache window and the sequence
- 04:30 The order book: a rolling 2-day window, and the dome
- 05:30 Dana's round: the customer's counter
- 06:50 Price per log, and the board
- 07:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When do you put edible glitter on a yule log — before the fridge, or after? Before, and the recipe hands you the exact moment.

A yule log recipe frosts the cake in whipped ganache, drags a knife through it for bark ridges, presses in the meringue mushrooms and sugared cranberries, covers it with an inverted container, refrigerates it for up to 2 days, and rests it 20 to 30 minutes before serving so the ganache softens. The shimmer goes on the ridge tops right after the knife, while the ganache is soft enough to take a dry brush; then the log goes cold under its dome. Dusting after the fridge means dusting onto condensation, which the chocolate guides say ruins a dusted finish — that is what happened to the bakery that glittered forty logs on pickup morning. Gold or bronze dust reads on chocolate because the gold luster dust carries iron oxide at 14 to 19 percent, a warm pigment with its own shadow; flake belongs only in the troughs as frost. Dana wins the round about the customer's counter: the recipe's rest sweats the log anyway, and the honest answer is that the pigment stays put, the exact look after 30 minutes is unmeasured, and the resting instruction goes on the box.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: why the ridge tops, not the whole log
- Gold and bronze on chocolate, dust over flake
- The 2-day fridge ceiling as a production schedule for forty logs
- Dana's round: the customer's counter, conceded properly
- Which jar for a season of logs

Who should skip it: logs going out in a warm delivery van, dark-on-dark rustic logs, and logs where the mushrooms are the story.

MONÉGASQUE Bronze 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Glitter a yule log before it goes in the fridge, never after. Dry-brush luster dust along the bark ridges right after the knife, while the whipped ganache is soft, then press in the decorations, cover with an inverted container and refrigerate — the recipe allows up to 2 days. A cold log taken out and dusted sweats, and condensation ruins a dusted finish. Use gold or bronze on chocolate; save flake for frost in the troughs.

- 00:00 Cold open — forty logs, forty phone calls
- 00:30 The verdict: brush before bowl
- 01:30 Sparkle Lab: why the ridges
- 02:30 Dust or flake, gold or silver, on chocolate
- 03:30 The soft-ganache window and the sequence
- 04:30 The order book: a rolling 2-day window, and the dome
- 05:30 Dana's round: the customer's counter
- 06:50 Price per log, and the board
- 07:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8fb9aaec/bfea33bc.mp3" length="8883172" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>554</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Forty yule logs glittered on pickup morning, straight from the fridge, and forty phone calls by noon. The brush goes before the bowl. Always.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Forty yule logs glittered on pickup morning, straight from the fridge, and forty phone calls by noon. The brush goes before the bowl. Always.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter yule log, bûche de Noël decorating, gold luster dust chocolate, bakery holiday orders, ganache bark glitter, Christmas cake shimmer, refrigerated cake condensation, cottage bakery December</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8fb9aaec/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is a Certified Color Additive? Reading the Two Halves of the Label</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>92</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>What Is a Certified Color Additive? Reading the Two Halves of the Label</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c9a316e-2c5f-4d58-be14-f4a45834484e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e99d4741</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is a certified color additive, and does edible glitter use them? A certified color is a dye whose every batch the FDA checks before it can be sold.

The maker submits a sample; the FDA runs at least 10 analyses — purity, moisture, residual salts, unreacted intermediates, subsidiary colors, and the heavy metals lead, arsenic and mercury — typically in under five working days, and a passing batch is certified. Those are the synthetic FD&amp;C dyes in part 74, titled "Color Additives Subject to Certification." Part 73, "Color Additives Exempt from Certification," holds colors generally from plants, minerals or animals — including mica-based pearlescent pigment, titanium dioxide and iron oxide — approved as a type, with limits written into each listing. The FDA says both classes must meet the same safety standard. The label rule, 21 CFR 101.22(k), makes certified dyes name themselves and lets exempt colors hide behind "color added," so a named dye is certified by definition. Edible glitter labels commonly carry both halves. A bakery owner's inspector asked "is the color certified?"; Dana wins the round that this is the wrong question, and the right one is the ingredient list plus two documents — a product specification and a written regulatory statement naming the food categories. No jar is "certified": the word attaches to dye batches, not products.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: the two halves of the rulebook and what batch certification physically is
- Why "exempt" means checked differently, not checked less
- The label rule that makes certified dyes name themselves
- The inspector conversation, twice: how it went and how it should go
- Why a safety data sheet is not the document that answers the color question

Who should skip it: home bakers who want the simple label checklist, anyone shopping for a "certified glitter" badge, and anyone who wants a podcast to rule on a specific jar.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** A certified color additive is a synthetic dye whose every batch the FDA analyzes — at least 10 analyses, typically in under five working days — before it can be sold; these are the FD&amp;C colors in 21 CFR part 74. Part 73 lists colors exempt from certification, approved as a type with limits written into each listing, and the FDA says both must meet the same safety standard. Edible glitter commonly carries both: a mica-based pigment from part 73 and, in tinted shades, a named FD&amp;C dye from part 74.

- 00:00 Cold open — two halves of the pantry
- 00:40 The bakery owner and the inspector's question
- 01:10 The verdict: what certification is, and the two halves
- 03:00 Sparkle Lab: the certified half and the batch process
- 05:00 The exempt half, and why exempt is not unchecked
- 07:00 The label rule: named dyes, "color added," and carmine
- 09:00 The glitter jar: which half is which
- 10:30 "Are your jars certified?" — why the word doesn't attach to jars
- 12:00 Dana's round: the wrong question and the right one
- 13:00 The safety data sheet, and the two documents that speak to food
- 15:00 The inspector conversation, done properly
- 16:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote · two teases

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is a certified color additive, and does edible glitter use them? A certified color is a dye whose every batch the FDA checks before it can be sold.

The maker submits a sample; the FDA runs at least 10 analyses — purity, moisture, residual salts, unreacted intermediates, subsidiary colors, and the heavy metals lead, arsenic and mercury — typically in under five working days, and a passing batch is certified. Those are the synthetic FD&amp;C dyes in part 74, titled "Color Additives Subject to Certification." Part 73, "Color Additives Exempt from Certification," holds colors generally from plants, minerals or animals — including mica-based pearlescent pigment, titanium dioxide and iron oxide — approved as a type, with limits written into each listing. The FDA says both classes must meet the same safety standard. The label rule, 21 CFR 101.22(k), makes certified dyes name themselves and lets exempt colors hide behind "color added," so a named dye is certified by definition. Edible glitter labels commonly carry both halves. A bakery owner's inspector asked "is the color certified?"; Dana wins the round that this is the wrong question, and the right one is the ingredient list plus two documents — a product specification and a written regulatory statement naming the food categories. No jar is "certified": the word attaches to dye batches, not products.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: the two halves of the rulebook and what batch certification physically is
- Why "exempt" means checked differently, not checked less
- The label rule that makes certified dyes name themselves
- The inspector conversation, twice: how it went and how it should go
- Why a safety data sheet is not the document that answers the color question

Who should skip it: home bakers who want the simple label checklist, anyone shopping for a "certified glitter" badge, and anyone who wants a podcast to rule on a specific jar.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** A certified color additive is a synthetic dye whose every batch the FDA analyzes — at least 10 analyses, typically in under five working days — before it can be sold; these are the FD&amp;C colors in 21 CFR part 74. Part 73 lists colors exempt from certification, approved as a type with limits written into each listing, and the FDA says both must meet the same safety standard. Edible glitter commonly carries both: a mica-based pigment from part 73 and, in tinted shades, a named FD&amp;C dye from part 74.

- 00:00 Cold open — two halves of the pantry
- 00:40 The bakery owner and the inspector's question
- 01:10 The verdict: what certification is, and the two halves
- 03:00 Sparkle Lab: the certified half and the batch process
- 05:00 The exempt half, and why exempt is not unchecked
- 07:00 The label rule: named dyes, "color added," and carmine
- 09:00 The glitter jar: which half is which
- 10:30 "Are your jars certified?" — why the word doesn't attach to jars
- 12:00 Dana's round: the wrong question and the right one
- 13:00 The safety data sheet, and the two documents that speak to food
- 15:00 The inspector conversation, done properly
- 16:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote · two teases

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e99d4741/1c7a6599.mp3" length="17202663" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1074</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Half the color in your pantry is certified and half is exempt; both are legal. The label tells you which half you're holding, if you know how.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Half the color in your pantry is certified and half is exempt; both are legal. The label tells you which half you're holding, if you know how.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>certified color additive, FD&amp;C colors, color additives exempt from certification, 21 CFR part 73, 21 CFR part 74, edible glitter ingredients, food color labeling rule, bakery health inspection</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e99d4741/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Peppermint Bark: The Fridge Is the Problem</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>91</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Peppermint Bark: The Fridge Is the Problem</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0cd20925-830d-4732-8142-08a7dae8fde1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b7eb646f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on peppermint bark without it coming out of the fridge grey? Glitter the last layer while it is wet, then keep it cold.

A peppermint-bark recipe builds three layers, chills each one 10 to 15 minutes until almost set — if a layer sets completely the layers can separate — tops the final white layer with crushed candy cane before its last chill, and keeps the finished bark covered in the fridge for up to 3 weeks. The glitter goes on at the same moment as the candy cane, because freshly poured chocolate grabs it with no adhesive at all. The grey finish is condensation: cold bark meeting warm kitchen air every time the fridge door opens to show someone, and the chocolate guides say condensation ruins a dusted finish. Pick a color rather than white, because white flake vanishes on white chocolate, and use flake rather than dust so it sits proud like the candy shards. Dana wins the round about the calendar: the 3 weeks is the maker's window, not the gift's — the recipe says a tin at room temperature has a few days — so make it late and gift it fast.

In this episode:
- Where in the recipe the glitter goes, and why it must go on wet
- Sparkle Lab: the fridge door, not the fridge
- Red or green flake on white chocolate, never white on white
- Dana's round: 3 weeks in your fridge, days on the neighbor's counter
- Ten weeks out: this weekend is the rehearsal batch

Who should skip it: bark that ships in the mail or a warm van, and bark that will live on a warm counter.

MONÉGASQUE Cherry Red 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Add the glitter to the final white-chocolate layer while it is still wet, at the same moment as the crushed candy cane, then chill. Freshly poured chocolate holds glitter with no adhesive. The grey, sweating finish is condensation from cold bark meeting warm air, so keep the bark cold and covered — the recipe allows up to 3 weeks in the fridge — and take it out once, straight into the tin. Use red or green flake, not white on white.

- 00:00 Cold open — six neighbors, grey bark
- 00:25 The verdict: wet layer, candy cane, then cold
- 01:15 The fridge door, not the fridge
- 01:45 Sparkle Lab: the chocolate window and the recipe's clock
- 02:40 Which color, and flake over dust
- 03:10 Dana's round: the maker's 3 weeks versus the neighbor's days
- 04:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on peppermint bark without it coming out of the fridge grey? Glitter the last layer while it is wet, then keep it cold.

A peppermint-bark recipe builds three layers, chills each one 10 to 15 minutes until almost set — if a layer sets completely the layers can separate — tops the final white layer with crushed candy cane before its last chill, and keeps the finished bark covered in the fridge for up to 3 weeks. The glitter goes on at the same moment as the candy cane, because freshly poured chocolate grabs it with no adhesive at all. The grey finish is condensation: cold bark meeting warm kitchen air every time the fridge door opens to show someone, and the chocolate guides say condensation ruins a dusted finish. Pick a color rather than white, because white flake vanishes on white chocolate, and use flake rather than dust so it sits proud like the candy shards. Dana wins the round about the calendar: the 3 weeks is the maker's window, not the gift's — the recipe says a tin at room temperature has a few days — so make it late and gift it fast.

In this episode:
- Where in the recipe the glitter goes, and why it must go on wet
- Sparkle Lab: the fridge door, not the fridge
- Red or green flake on white chocolate, never white on white
- Dana's round: 3 weeks in your fridge, days on the neighbor's counter
- Ten weeks out: this weekend is the rehearsal batch

Who should skip it: bark that ships in the mail or a warm van, and bark that will live on a warm counter.

MONÉGASQUE Cherry Red 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Add the glitter to the final white-chocolate layer while it is still wet, at the same moment as the crushed candy cane, then chill. Freshly poured chocolate holds glitter with no adhesive. The grey, sweating finish is condensation from cold bark meeting warm air, so keep the bark cold and covered — the recipe allows up to 3 weeks in the fridge — and take it out once, straight into the tin. Use red or green flake, not white on white.

- 00:00 Cold open — six neighbors, grey bark
- 00:25 The verdict: wet layer, candy cane, then cold
- 01:15 The fridge door, not the fridge
- 01:45 Sparkle Lab: the chocolate window and the recipe's clock
- 02:40 Which color, and flake over dust
- 03:10 Dana's round: the maker's 3 weeks versus the neighbor's days
- 04:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b7eb646f/564ff02f.mp3" length="5288725" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>330</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Grey, sweating bark isn't a bad jar — it's cold chocolate meeting warm air. Glitter the last layer wet, keep it cold, and take it out once.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Grey, sweating bark isn't a bad jar — it's cold chocolate meeting warm air. Glitter the last layer wet, keep it cold, and take it out once.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter peppermint bark, peppermint bark decorating, holiday candy gifts, chocolate condensation glitter, Christmas bark recipe, red edible glitter, gift tins baking, make-ahead holiday treats</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b7eb646f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter for a Christmas Cookie Exchange: Which Jar for 4 Dozen</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>90</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>90</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter for a Christmas Cookie Exchange: Which Jar for 4 Dozen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ad3be0f-b3a4-4936-b6b6-b4d49c3f3156</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/18c9dfb9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter do you need for a Christmas cookie exchange, and which jar? The 7 gram, almost always — and the invitation decides it.

A hosting guide's standard format is 8 to 12 guests, each bringing 36 to 48 homemade cookies with a recipe card that lists allergens. That is three to four dozen of one cookie, glittered once. The 7 gram luster dust is $9.99, about $1.43 per gram; the 15 gram is $14.99, about $1.00 per gram — the better rate and, for one swap, the wrong jar, because the real cost is the unfinished jar: half a 15 gram jar is about $7.50 of product in a cupboard. No per-cookie dose is published and the printed 0.1 gram serving is a drinks number, so the method is to dust a test dozen from a small dish and multiply. Dust behind the flood while the icing is wet and glossy, on icing day, never on swap morning. Dana wins the round about paperwork: the recipe card has to say what the shimmer is, so the jar must carry an ingredient list with its color additives named — which the FDA advisory says makers are required by law to provide.

In this episode:
- The per-gram board, read in full, and why the rate is only real if the jar gets finished
- A test dozen instead of an invented per-cookie dose
- When to dust: behind the flood, on Friday, not Saturday
- Dana's round: the recipe card is the test the jar has to pass
- One color, picked against the icing, not against Christmas

Who should skip it: shortbread, snickerdoodles and biscotti with no icing, bars and brownies without a glaze, and anyone who would rather not write a color additive on a recipe card.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard in 13 colors; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Buy the 7 gram jar. A standard cookie exchange is 8 to 12 guests each bringing 36 to 48 cookies, so you are glittering three to four dozen of one cookie once, and the 7 gram luster dust at $9.99 covers it. The 15 gram at $14.99 has the better per-gram rate but only pays off if the jar is used across the season. Dust the icing while it is wet, on icing day, and copy the jar's ingredient list onto the recipe card.

- 00:00 Cold open — 4 dozen, homemade, with a card
- 00:35 The verdict: the 7 gram, and why the invitation decides
- 01:30 Dana contests the rate; the unfinished-jar arithmetic
- 02:30 The board in full, including the 12-color box
- 03:20 How much per cookie: the test dozen
- 04:10 When to dust, and the dry-tray rescue
- 05:10 Dana's round: the recipe card is the test
- 06:30 Which color, against the icing
- 07:10 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter do you need for a Christmas cookie exchange, and which jar? The 7 gram, almost always — and the invitation decides it.

A hosting guide's standard format is 8 to 12 guests, each bringing 36 to 48 homemade cookies with a recipe card that lists allergens. That is three to four dozen of one cookie, glittered once. The 7 gram luster dust is $9.99, about $1.43 per gram; the 15 gram is $14.99, about $1.00 per gram — the better rate and, for one swap, the wrong jar, because the real cost is the unfinished jar: half a 15 gram jar is about $7.50 of product in a cupboard. No per-cookie dose is published and the printed 0.1 gram serving is a drinks number, so the method is to dust a test dozen from a small dish and multiply. Dust behind the flood while the icing is wet and glossy, on icing day, never on swap morning. Dana wins the round about paperwork: the recipe card has to say what the shimmer is, so the jar must carry an ingredient list with its color additives named — which the FDA advisory says makers are required by law to provide.

In this episode:
- The per-gram board, read in full, and why the rate is only real if the jar gets finished
- A test dozen instead of an invented per-cookie dose
- When to dust: behind the flood, on Friday, not Saturday
- Dana's round: the recipe card is the test the jar has to pass
- One color, picked against the icing, not against Christmas

Who should skip it: shortbread, snickerdoodles and biscotti with no icing, bars and brownies without a glaze, and anyone who would rather not write a color additive on a recipe card.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 standard in 13 colors; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Buy the 7 gram jar. A standard cookie exchange is 8 to 12 guests each bringing 36 to 48 cookies, so you are glittering three to four dozen of one cookie once, and the 7 gram luster dust at $9.99 covers it. The 15 gram at $14.99 has the better per-gram rate but only pays off if the jar is used across the season. Dust the icing while it is wet, on icing day, and copy the jar's ingredient list onto the recipe card.

- 00:00 Cold open — 4 dozen, homemade, with a card
- 00:35 The verdict: the 7 gram, and why the invitation decides
- 01:30 Dana contests the rate; the unfinished-jar arithmetic
- 02:30 The board in full, including the 12-color box
- 03:20 How much per cookie: the test dozen
- 04:10 When to dust, and the dry-tray rescue
- 05:10 Dana's round: the recipe card is the test
- 06:30 Which color, against the icing
- 07:10 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/18c9dfb9/3ddf2d6b.mp3" length="8117900" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>506</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The invitation says 4 dozen. That number, not the price per gram, picks the jar — and the recipe card decides whether the jar comes to the swap.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The invitation says 4 dozen. That number, not the price per gram, picks the jar — and the recipe card decides whether the jar comes to the swap.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter cookie exchange, Christmas cookie swap, how much edible glitter for cookies, 7 gram luster dust, cookie exchange rules, recipe card allergens, glitter on royal icing cookies, holiday baking budget</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/18c9dfb9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Rim a Cocktail Glass With Edible Glitter So It Stays Put</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>89</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>89</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How to Rim a Cocktail Glass With Edible Glitter So It Stays Put</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b8e3fb3d-8df5-42e6-979e-0bd7417e45fd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e82ff32e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you rim a cocktail glass with edible glitter so it actually stays put? Vodka, not water; a saucer, not the jar; flake, not dust.

The method comes from a home-entertaining tutorial: spread the glitter on a small plate, dip the rim in vodka, then dip the wet rim in the glitter. The tutorial's reason is the whole trick — vodka works better than water because it evaporates more quickly, so there is less dripping, melting and sticky mess, especially on sugar rims. A glass never sets the way icing or chocolate does, so the only thing holding glitter to a rim is the film it was dipped in; a water film stays wet and the glitter migrates down the glass, while a spirit flashes off and leaves the flake on a dry edge. Flake at 50 to 500 microns sits proud like frost; fine dust at 5 to 25 microns smears. Dana wins the round about the plate: glitter that has met a dozen wet rims never goes back in the jar, so tip out a little at a time. The tutorial publishes no quantity, drying time or make-ahead window, and the episode says so rather than inventing them.

In this episode:
- Why water rims migrate and spirit rims stay
- Sparkle Lab: a glass never sets, so the film does all the work
- Flake versus dust on a rim, and the sugar-rim caveat
- Dana's round: small pile, refilled often, nothing back in the jar
- What the pigment's listing says about which drinks it covers

Who should skip it: straw drinkers, glasses that get abandoned and replaced, and drinks where the swirl in the glass is already the show.

MONÉGASQUE Silver Sparkle 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Dip the rim in vodka, then in a small plate of flake glitter. A tutorial's reason is the whole trick: the spirit evaporates quickly, so there is no wet film for the glitter to slide on, where water keeps the rim wet all night. Use flake (50 to 500 microns) rather than fine dust, tip out a small pile at a time, and never return glitter that has met wet rims to the jar. No published figure exists for how much a rim takes or how far ahead it can be done.

- 00:00 Cold open — wet-sand glasses by ten o'clock
- 00:30 The verdict in four parts
- 01:30 Sparkle Lab: a glass never sets
- 02:40 Flake or dust on a rim
- 03:20 Sugar rims, and the numbers nobody publishes
- 04:10 Dana's round: the plate never goes back in the jar
- 05:30 What the listing covers, described and left there
- 06:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you rim a cocktail glass with edible glitter so it actually stays put? Vodka, not water; a saucer, not the jar; flake, not dust.

The method comes from a home-entertaining tutorial: spread the glitter on a small plate, dip the rim in vodka, then dip the wet rim in the glitter. The tutorial's reason is the whole trick — vodka works better than water because it evaporates more quickly, so there is less dripping, melting and sticky mess, especially on sugar rims. A glass never sets the way icing or chocolate does, so the only thing holding glitter to a rim is the film it was dipped in; a water film stays wet and the glitter migrates down the glass, while a spirit flashes off and leaves the flake on a dry edge. Flake at 50 to 500 microns sits proud like frost; fine dust at 5 to 25 microns smears. Dana wins the round about the plate: glitter that has met a dozen wet rims never goes back in the jar, so tip out a little at a time. The tutorial publishes no quantity, drying time or make-ahead window, and the episode says so rather than inventing them.

In this episode:
- Why water rims migrate and spirit rims stay
- Sparkle Lab: a glass never sets, so the film does all the work
- Flake versus dust on a rim, and the sugar-rim caveat
- Dana's round: small pile, refilled often, nothing back in the jar
- What the pigment's listing says about which drinks it covers

Who should skip it: straw drinkers, glasses that get abandoned and replaced, and drinks where the swirl in the glass is already the show.

MONÉGASQUE Silver Sparkle 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Dip the rim in vodka, then in a small plate of flake glitter. A tutorial's reason is the whole trick: the spirit evaporates quickly, so there is no wet film for the glitter to slide on, where water keeps the rim wet all night. Use flake (50 to 500 microns) rather than fine dust, tip out a small pile at a time, and never return glitter that has met wet rims to the jar. No published figure exists for how much a rim takes or how far ahead it can be done.

- 00:00 Cold open — wet-sand glasses by ten o'clock
- 00:30 The verdict in four parts
- 01:30 Sparkle Lab: a glass never sets
- 02:40 Flake or dust on a rim
- 03:20 Sugar rims, and the numbers nobody publishes
- 04:10 Dana's round: the plate never goes back in the jar
- 05:30 What the listing covers, described and left there
- 06:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e82ff32e/45af3473.mp3" length="7612581" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>475</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Glitter rims that slide by ten o'clock were dipped in water. Vodka flashes off, a glass never sets, and the plate never goes back in the jar.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Glitter rims that slide by ten o'clock were dipped in water. Vodka flashes off, a glass never sets, and the plate never goes back in the jar.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter rim, how to rim a cocktail glass, glitter rimmed glass, holiday cocktail garnish, edible glitter with sugar, drink glitter flake, vodka rim technique, New Year's Eve cocktails</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e82ff32e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can You Put Edible Glitter in Eggnog? What the Listing Says</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>88</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Can You Put Edible Glitter in Eggnog? What the Listing Says</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">626b3b4a-68ec-4090-8886-020034aa3593</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7cbc498e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in eggnog? No — and not for the reason you would guess.

The color-additive listing for mica-based pearlescent pigment, 21 CFR 73.350, lists the drinks it covers, and when it reaches non-alcoholic cocktail mixes and mixers it carves out three things by name: eggnog, tonic water, and beverages typically consumed without added alcohol. Eggnog is named, so this show does not point anyone at it. Eggnog's own federal standard — 21 CFR 131.170, with its 6 percent milkfat and 1 percent egg yolk solids — does allow color additives that do not imitate the color of yolk or milkfat, but that is a separate document and changes nothing about what the pigment's listing says. The episode reads both and rules on neither, including on whether a bottle of brandy moves a punch bowl anywhere. Dana wins the practical round: eggnog is opaque, so no one would see the shimmer anyway. The fix is a clear signature cocktail beside the bowl, at the printed serving of 0.1 grams a glass.

In this episode:
- The three drinks the pigment's listing excludes by name, read out
- Sparkle Lab: what eggnog's own standard of identity says about color
- Why a spiked bowl is not a question a podcast settles
- Dana's round: it's opaque anyway
- One 15 gram jar for a room of 100, and what to ask a supplier for in writing

Who should skip it: anyone whose whole drinks plan is the nog, and anyone whose client insists on shimmer in the bowl.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** No. The federal listing for mica-based pearlescent pigment, 21 CFR 73.350, expressly excludes eggnog from its non-alcoholic mixer clause, alongside tonic water and drinks typically consumed without added alcohol. Eggnog's own standard of identity permits some color additives, but that is a separate rule and does not change the pigment's listing. Put the shimmer in a clear signature cocktail beside the bowl instead, at about 0.1 grams a glass.

- 00:00 Cold open — the drink the rulebook names
- 00:25 The verdict: named, excluded, and the cocktail beside the bowl
- 01:10 The spiked bowl, and why we don't rule on it
- 01:40 Sparkle Lab: eggnog's own standard of identity
- 02:40 Dana's round: it's opaque
- 03:20 A clear cocktail for 100 guests, and the paperwork to ask for
- 04:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in eggnog? No — and not for the reason you would guess.

The color-additive listing for mica-based pearlescent pigment, 21 CFR 73.350, lists the drinks it covers, and when it reaches non-alcoholic cocktail mixes and mixers it carves out three things by name: eggnog, tonic water, and beverages typically consumed without added alcohol. Eggnog is named, so this show does not point anyone at it. Eggnog's own federal standard — 21 CFR 131.170, with its 6 percent milkfat and 1 percent egg yolk solids — does allow color additives that do not imitate the color of yolk or milkfat, but that is a separate document and changes nothing about what the pigment's listing says. The episode reads both and rules on neither, including on whether a bottle of brandy moves a punch bowl anywhere. Dana wins the practical round: eggnog is opaque, so no one would see the shimmer anyway. The fix is a clear signature cocktail beside the bowl, at the printed serving of 0.1 grams a glass.

In this episode:
- The three drinks the pigment's listing excludes by name, read out
- Sparkle Lab: what eggnog's own standard of identity says about color
- Why a spiked bowl is not a question a podcast settles
- Dana's round: it's opaque anyway
- One 15 gram jar for a room of 100, and what to ask a supplier for in writing

Who should skip it: anyone whose whole drinks plan is the nog, and anyone whose client insists on shimmer in the bowl.

MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** No. The federal listing for mica-based pearlescent pigment, 21 CFR 73.350, expressly excludes eggnog from its non-alcoholic mixer clause, alongside tonic water and drinks typically consumed without added alcohol. Eggnog's own standard of identity permits some color additives, but that is a separate rule and does not change the pigment's listing. Put the shimmer in a clear signature cocktail beside the bowl instead, at about 0.1 grams a glass.

- 00:00 Cold open — the drink the rulebook names
- 00:25 The verdict: named, excluded, and the cocktail beside the bowl
- 01:10 The spiked bowl, and why we don't rule on it
- 01:40 Sparkle Lab: eggnog's own standard of identity
- 02:40 Dana's round: it's opaque
- 03:20 A clear cocktail for 100 guests, and the paperwork to ask for
- 04:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7cbc498e/e9a92033.mp3" length="5271170" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>329</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Eggnog is the one holiday drink the pigment's own federal listing names — as excluded. The shimmer belongs in the clear cocktail beside the bowl.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Eggnog is the one holiday drink the pigment's own federal listing names — as excluded. The shimmer belongs in the clear cocktail beside the bowl.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter eggnog, can you put glitter in eggnog, 21 CFR 73.350 beverages, holiday party drinks, edible glitter cocktails, eggnog standard of identity, shimmer cocktail, holiday party planning</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7cbc498e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on a Gingerbread House: Icing, Not Cookie, and When</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>87</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>87</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on a Gingerbread House: Icing, Not Cookie, and When</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75df7087-08a4-4de6-a890-4180a52667c4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a70f32cc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter on a gingerbread house — does it go on the icing or on the cookie? On the icing, and only while it is wet.

A gingerbread house has two icings doing two different jobs at two different times. The structural royal icing that holds the walls up grabs in minutes and dries hard over hours, so by the time anyone is decorating, it is a rock. The decorating icing — the snow on the roof, the piped windows, the icicles — is wet while you are looking at it, and wet, glossy icing is the only surface that holds shimmer. A baked cookie is dry and holds nothing; one decorating guide says glitter sprayed onto a fully dried cookie is very likely to wipe away. A baking guide's tip is to decorate the panels flat before assembly, let them dry flat, then build and finish the joints. Dana points out that her children decorate the standing house, so the show flips the plan: build the night before, then glitter the fresh snow as it is piped.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: why a tacky-feeling cookie holds no glitter and why the glue icing is a rock by decorating time
- Dana's winning round: the kids decorate the finished house, so the rule is "wet," not "flat"
- Fresh beads along the joints, and why you never wet dried royal icing to fix it
- Flake on the roof, dust on the windows, and never out of the jar
- Which jar: 7 gram for one house, 15 gram for a family tradition

Who should skip it: display houses nobody eats, very small decorators, and anyone standing over a bare cookie with a jar and no icing.

MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard and the 7 gram luster dusts at $9.99; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Glitter goes on the icing, never the bare cookie, and only while the icing is wet. The stiff royal icing that holds a gingerbread house together sets in minutes and dries hard over hours, so the shimmer belongs on the decorating icing — the snow, windows and icicles — right behind the piping bag. Decorate panels flat before assembly where the design allows; if children decorate the standing house, build it the night before and glitter the fresh icing on decorating day.

- 00:00 Cold open — glitter in the couch
- 00:30 The verdict: two icings, one of them wet
- 01:30 Decorate the panels flat, and why
- 02:20 Sparkle Lab: why the cookie holds nothing
- 03:20 The glue icing: minutes to grab, hours to dry
- 04:20 Dana's round: the kids decorate the finished house
- 05:30 Fresh beads on the joints; never water on dried royal icing
- 06:20 Tools: dish, sieve, dust pump; flake versus dust
- 07:10 Which jar, and who should skip it
- 08:20 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next time

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter on a gingerbread house — does it go on the icing or on the cookie? On the icing, and only while it is wet.

A gingerbread house has two icings doing two different jobs at two different times. The structural royal icing that holds the walls up grabs in minutes and dries hard over hours, so by the time anyone is decorating, it is a rock. The decorating icing — the snow on the roof, the piped windows, the icicles — is wet while you are looking at it, and wet, glossy icing is the only surface that holds shimmer. A baked cookie is dry and holds nothing; one decorating guide says glitter sprayed onto a fully dried cookie is very likely to wipe away. A baking guide's tip is to decorate the panels flat before assembly, let them dry flat, then build and finish the joints. Dana points out that her children decorate the standing house, so the show flips the plan: build the night before, then glitter the fresh snow as it is piped.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: why a tacky-feeling cookie holds no glitter and why the glue icing is a rock by decorating time
- Dana's winning round: the kids decorate the finished house, so the rule is "wet," not "flat"
- Fresh beads along the joints, and why you never wet dried royal icing to fix it
- Flake on the roof, dust on the windows, and never out of the jar
- Which jar: 7 gram for one house, 15 gram for a family tradition

Who should skip it: display houses nobody eats, very small decorators, and anyone standing over a bare cookie with a jar and no icing.

MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 gram drink glitter is on Amazon at $14.99 standard and the 7 gram luster dusts at $9.99; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Glitter goes on the icing, never the bare cookie, and only while the icing is wet. The stiff royal icing that holds a gingerbread house together sets in minutes and dries hard over hours, so the shimmer belongs on the decorating icing — the snow, windows and icicles — right behind the piping bag. Decorate panels flat before assembly where the design allows; if children decorate the standing house, build it the night before and glitter the fresh icing on decorating day.

- 00:00 Cold open — glitter in the couch
- 00:30 The verdict: two icings, one of them wet
- 01:30 Decorate the panels flat, and why
- 02:20 Sparkle Lab: why the cookie holds nothing
- 03:20 The glue icing: minutes to grab, hours to dry
- 04:20 Dana's round: the kids decorate the finished house
- 05:30 Fresh beads on the joints; never water on dried royal icing
- 06:20 Tools: dish, sieve, dust pump; flake versus dust
- 07:10 Which jar, and who should skip it
- 08:20 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next time

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a70f32cc/087c82bb.mp3" length="9398524" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>586</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A gingerbread house has two icings and only one of them is ever wet when you're decorating. That's where the glitter goes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A gingerbread house has two icings and only one of them is ever wet when you're decorating. That's where the glitter goes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter gingerbread house, gingerbread house decorating, royal icing glitter, Christmas baking with kids, gingerbread house icing, edible glitter Christmas, sprinkles before assembly, holiday baking</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a70f32cc/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silver Edible Glitter for Cakes: Making It Read on White</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>86</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>86</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Silver Edible Glitter for Cakes: Making It Read on White</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06f71099-a65c-453c-bb7d-6ba5108e9404</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9d4847a9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which silver edible glitter works on a white winter cake? Any of them — if you give the silver something to show against.

Silver is not a colour the way red is; it is an effect, light bouncing off a bright coating grown on a mineral platelet. The silver luster dust's own safety data sheet shows why it struggles on white: 62 to 73 percent mica, 27 to 38 percent titanium dioxide and a trace of iron oxide, so it carries no dark pigment of its own, where the gold jar's iron oxide gives it a built-in shadow. Put fine silver dust on a flat white face under a ceiling light and it reads as faint grey, and the camera gives up. Three fixes, cheapest first: stand the white cake on a dark board so every silver edge has a shadow to sit against; light it from the side rather than above; and use flake before dust on white, because 50 to 500 micron flakes are little mirrors pointed in different directions and survive flat light where a sheen does not. A cake-trade trend guide for 2026 names silver the metallic of the year and an all-white "Cloud Dancer" look — fashionable and difficult are the same sentence here.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: why gold carries its own darkness and silver does not
- Colour choice versus finish choice, and how last year's cake was right about one and wrong about the other
- Dana's winning round: the black slate board she already owns
- Flake versus dust on white, plainly
- The season, about 10 weeks out, and why most silver tables end up with gold on them

Who should skip it: warm palettes, matte briefs, and white cakes on white cloths under lights you cannot change.

MONÉGASQUE Silver 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which silver edible glitter works on a white winter cake? Any of them — if you give the silver something to show against.

Silver is not a colour the way red is; it is an effect, light bouncing off a bright coating grown on a mineral platelet. The silver luster dust's own safety data sheet shows why it struggles on white: 62 to 73 percent mica, 27 to 38 percent titanium dioxide and a trace of iron oxide, so it carries no dark pigment of its own, where the gold jar's iron oxide gives it a built-in shadow. Put fine silver dust on a flat white face under a ceiling light and it reads as faint grey, and the camera gives up. Three fixes, cheapest first: stand the white cake on a dark board so every silver edge has a shadow to sit against; light it from the side rather than above; and use flake before dust on white, because 50 to 500 micron flakes are little mirrors pointed in different directions and survive flat light where a sheen does not. A cake-trade trend guide for 2026 names silver the metallic of the year and an all-white "Cloud Dancer" look — fashionable and difficult are the same sentence here.

In this episode:
- Sparkle Lab: why gold carries its own darkness and silver does not
- Colour choice versus finish choice, and how last year's cake was right about one and wrong about the other
- Dana's winning round: the black slate board she already owns
- Flake versus dust on white, plainly
- The season, about 10 weeks out, and why most silver tables end up with gold on them

Who should skip it: warm palettes, matte briefs, and white cakes on white cloths under lights you cannot change.

MONÉGASQUE Silver 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9d4847a9/1e1375f4.mp3" length="8158847" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>509</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Silver on white is the easiest look in the book and the one that vanishes in photos. The fix is a dark plate, side light, and flake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Silver on white is the easiest look in the book and the one that vanishes in photos. The fix is a dark plate, side light, and flake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>silver edible glitter, silver luster dust, white and silver cake, winter cake decorating, Christmas cake silver, edible glitter photography, Cloud Dancer cake trend, silver glitter on white</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9d4847a9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on a Mile-High Cake: Where It Shows</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>85</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>85</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on a Mile-High Cake: Where It Shows</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4318def9-d2c7-409b-8c32-8ee9f2b0e841</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8723b334</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Where do you put edible glitter on a mile-high cake so it actually shows? On the sides, not the top.

A planner had the top tier of a very tall party cake dusted gold, and in every photo from the night the top is a sliver and the sides are bare. Guests stand next to a tall cake and cameras shoot it from standing height, so the top is a place almost nobody sees. A premium bakery's 2026 trend guide says mile-high cakes "make value visible" and that "taller cakes feel more generous, more premium and far more photogenic" — the height is the whole product, so the finish should decorate the height. Dry-brush luster dust in a band on the side faces at eye level, drop flake onto the wet piped borders where the tiers step, and leave the top alone or give it one accent. A sheen covers and so costs powder, which is why it is a band and not a full wrap.

In this episode:
- Why a tall cake's top is invisible and its sides are the photograph
- Dust on the faces, flake on the ledges: two jars, two jobs
- Dana's winning round: tall cakes live in the fridge, so the dusting slot moves to the venue
- The per-gram board and how the first band tells you the dose
- Rooms with only downlight, and why they want flake

Who should skip it: cakes that travel far in a warm van after decorating, and rooms lit only from above.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Where do you put edible glitter on a mile-high cake so it actually shows? On the sides, not the top.

A planner had the top tier of a very tall party cake dusted gold, and in every photo from the night the top is a sliver and the sides are bare. Guests stand next to a tall cake and cameras shoot it from standing height, so the top is a place almost nobody sees. A premium bakery's 2026 trend guide says mile-high cakes "make value visible" and that "taller cakes feel more generous, more premium and far more photogenic" — the height is the whole product, so the finish should decorate the height. Dry-brush luster dust in a band on the side faces at eye level, drop flake onto the wet piped borders where the tiers step, and leave the top alone or give it one accent. A sheen covers and so costs powder, which is why it is a band and not a full wrap.

In this episode:
- Why a tall cake's top is invisible and its sides are the photograph
- Dust on the faces, flake on the ledges: two jars, two jobs
- Dana's winning round: tall cakes live in the fridge, so the dusting slot moves to the venue
- The per-gram board and how the first band tells you the dose
- Rooms with only downlight, and why they want flake

Who should skip it: cakes that travel far in a warm van after decorating, and rooms lit only from above.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8723b334/ba87958b.mp3" length="5214319" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>325</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The top of a tall cake is a place nobody sees. Put the shimmer on the sides at eye level, the flake on the ledges, and leave the top.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The top of a tall cake is a place nobody sees. Put the shimmer on the sides at eye level, the flake on the ledges, and leave the top.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>mile high cake, tall tiered cake glitter, edible glitter wedding cake, luster dust tiered cake, event cake decorating, edible glitter photos, cake ledges flake</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8723b334/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Cake Pops: Timing and Cost Per Batch</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>84</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Cake Pops: Timing and Cost Per Batch</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">acebc4b9-2f14-4bd5-a501-2192e722bf76</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/10f7801c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on cake pops, and what does it cost per batch? Timing first, because it is free: the coating does the work.

Freshly dipped, still-warm coating grabs flake glitter with no adhesive at all — the widest application window in the category — so flake goes on in the seconds after the dip, while the shell is wet and glossy, inside a motion you are already making. Once the shell has set, luster dust goes on as a second pass with a soft dry brush, and never on a pop that has been in the fridge, because refrigerated chocolate carries condensation that ruins a dusted finish. So the line is dip, set, chill, bring the trays out to dry, brush, box. On cost, the honest part: nobody has published a per-pop figure, and the only serving printed on the listings is the drinks one, 0.1 grams. A bakery weighs the jar before and after the first dozen and has its own number by the end of the first tray. Then it buys by the gram — the 15 gram luster dust at $14.99 is about $1.00 a gram, the cheapest gram in a single colour — and the listing's business quantity ladder starts at 2 jars.

In this episode:
- The dip window, and why flake is cheaper in labour while dust is cheaper in powder
- Chill first, dust second: the fridge rule on a production line
- Dana's winning round: the number nobody could give the bakery, and how to measure it
- The per-gram board and the quantity ladder
- The three-part documentation request for a corporate client

Who should skip it: pops wrapped while the coating is soft, kitchens that cannot schedule chill-then-dust, and six-colour orders.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you put edible glitter on cake pops, and what does it cost per batch? Timing first, because it is free: the coating does the work.

Freshly dipped, still-warm coating grabs flake glitter with no adhesive at all — the widest application window in the category — so flake goes on in the seconds after the dip, while the shell is wet and glossy, inside a motion you are already making. Once the shell has set, luster dust goes on as a second pass with a soft dry brush, and never on a pop that has been in the fridge, because refrigerated chocolate carries condensation that ruins a dusted finish. So the line is dip, set, chill, bring the trays out to dry, brush, box. On cost, the honest part: nobody has published a per-pop figure, and the only serving printed on the listings is the drinks one, 0.1 grams. A bakery weighs the jar before and after the first dozen and has its own number by the end of the first tray. Then it buys by the gram — the 15 gram luster dust at $14.99 is about $1.00 a gram, the cheapest gram in a single colour — and the listing's business quantity ladder starts at 2 jars.

In this episode:
- The dip window, and why flake is cheaper in labour while dust is cheaper in powder
- Chill first, dust second: the fridge rule on a production line
- Dana's winning round: the number nobody could give the bakery, and how to measure it
- The per-gram board and the quantity ladder
- The three-part documentation request for a corporate client

Who should skip it: pops wrapped while the coating is soft, kitchens that cannot schedule chill-then-dust, and six-colour orders.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/10f7801c/9c5d9360.mp3" length="7697418" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>480</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A bakery asked how many jars 300 cake pops need. Nobody has that number — but the first dozen on a kitchen scale does.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A bakery asked how many jars 300 cake pops need. Nobody has that number — but the first dozen on a kitchen scale does.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter cake pops, luster dust cake pops, cake pop coating glitter, bakery cake pops bulk, edible glitter cost per batch, corporate holiday cake pops, dipped chocolate glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/10f7801c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can You Store Edible Glitter in the Fridge? No, and Here's Why</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>83</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>83</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Can You Store Edible Glitter in the Fridge? No, and Here's Why</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6e7b14e-1fe2-454a-85fb-0b752c8be6ff</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/738598bd</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you store edible glitter in the fridge? No, and the reason is water in a different disguise.

Category storage guidance answers this question with a flat no: a fridge introduces condensation the moment the container comes out into warm air, and condensation is moisture, and moisture is the one thing that clumps this powder. Take a cold glass out of the fridge and it fogs; do that to a jar of powder and the jar fogs outside, then fogs inside the second you open it. Every trip to the fridge puts a little water in the jar. The chocolate guides say the same about a dusted finish — refrigerated chocolate carries condensation that ruins it. The right home is a cool, dry cupboard, roughly 15 to 20 degrees Celsius and under 60 percent humidity, away from the stove, the kettle and the dishwasher, sealed tight and opened with a dry spoon. In a hot July kitchen that number is a target, not a rule: the cupboard farthest from the oven is still better than the fridge, because warm-and-dry is a mild problem and cold-then-wet is the whole problem.

In this episode:
- Why a cold jar fogs, inside and out
- The storage numbers, and what they mean in a summer kitchen
- Dana's winning round: my kitchen is hotter than 20 degrees for three months a year
- What the mineral does and does not do over time
- Why the date on the package is the only shelf-life answer this show gives

Who should skip it: damp basements and garages as storage, and any jar that has already clumped in the fridge.

MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 gram is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you store edible glitter in the fridge? No, and the reason is water in a different disguise.

Category storage guidance answers this question with a flat no: a fridge introduces condensation the moment the container comes out into warm air, and condensation is moisture, and moisture is the one thing that clumps this powder. Take a cold glass out of the fridge and it fogs; do that to a jar of powder and the jar fogs outside, then fogs inside the second you open it. Every trip to the fridge puts a little water in the jar. The chocolate guides say the same about a dusted finish — refrigerated chocolate carries condensation that ruins it. The right home is a cool, dry cupboard, roughly 15 to 20 degrees Celsius and under 60 percent humidity, away from the stove, the kettle and the dishwasher, sealed tight and opened with a dry spoon. In a hot July kitchen that number is a target, not a rule: the cupboard farthest from the oven is still better than the fridge, because warm-and-dry is a mild problem and cold-then-wet is the whole problem.

In this episode:
- Why a cold jar fogs, inside and out
- The storage numbers, and what they mean in a summer kitchen
- Dana's winning round: my kitchen is hotter than 20 degrees for three months a year
- What the mineral does and does not do over time
- Why the date on the package is the only shelf-life answer this show gives

Who should skip it: damp basements and garages as storage, and any jar that has already clumped in the fridge.

MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 gram is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/738598bd/9e866568.mp3" length="4984453" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>311</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Cold isn't the problem. Cold meeting warm is — every trip out of the fridge puts water in the jar, and water is what clumps it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cold isn't the problem. Cold meeting warm is — every trip out of the fridge puts water in the jar, and water is what clumps it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>store edible glitter, edible glitter fridge, edible glitter storage, does edible glitter go off, clumped glitter, luster dust storage, edible glitter shelf life</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/738598bd/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Do You Fix Clumped Edible Glitter? Mostly, You Prevent It</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>82</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>82</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How Do You Fix Clumped Edible Glitter? Mostly, You Prevent It</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e71864e-498f-4f97-a083-d190027321e6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/704cfea2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you fix clumped edible glitter? Mostly, you don't. You prevent it, and you can prevent it completely.

The clump is moisture. Category storage guidance is blunt that clumping is caused by moisture and almost nothing else: steam from a glass washer, a wet bar spoon, damp fingers, a warm humid room. The mineral itself is not harmed — its safety data sheet describes a powder that is almost insoluble in water and chemically stable — so a clump is powder holding hands through damp, the way sand does at the beach. But no published procedure exists for drying a damp jar back to new, and the same guidance lists clumping, dull colour and any off smell as signs of quality loss that mean the product should not go on food. So the ladder is short: soft lumps that break to clean, free-flowing powder through a dry sieve are a judgement call you make with your eyes and nose; a solid rock, or anything dull, gritty or smelly, is finished, and half a 10 gram jar is about $7.50 of lesson.

In this episode:
- How a jar that was new in summer became one rock by a bachelorette party
- Dana's winning round: a bar is the wettest room in the building, so storage becomes portioning
- The 4 gram service portion for a 40-drink night, and why it never goes back into the jar
- What a clump does in the glass if you serve it anyway
- A five-line prevention checklist for the dry-store door

Who should skip it: bars doing one shimmer drink a month, and any set-up with no dry store.

MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you fix clumped edible glitter? Mostly, you don't. You prevent it, and you can prevent it completely.

The clump is moisture. Category storage guidance is blunt that clumping is caused by moisture and almost nothing else: steam from a glass washer, a wet bar spoon, damp fingers, a warm humid room. The mineral itself is not harmed — its safety data sheet describes a powder that is almost insoluble in water and chemically stable — so a clump is powder holding hands through damp, the way sand does at the beach. But no published procedure exists for drying a damp jar back to new, and the same guidance lists clumping, dull colour and any off smell as signs of quality loss that mean the product should not go on food. So the ladder is short: soft lumps that break to clean, free-flowing powder through a dry sieve are a judgement call you make with your eyes and nose; a solid rock, or anything dull, gritty or smelly, is finished, and half a 10 gram jar is about $7.50 of lesson.

In this episode:
- How a jar that was new in summer became one rock by a bachelorette party
- Dana's winning round: a bar is the wettest room in the building, so storage becomes portioning
- The 4 gram service portion for a 40-drink night, and why it never goes back into the jar
- What a clump does in the glass if you serve it anyway
- A five-line prevention checklist for the dry-store door

Who should skip it: bars doing one shimmer drink a month, and any set-up with no dry store.

MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/704cfea2/6d9ed2af.mp3" length="8158016" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>509</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A jar turned to one gold rock before a party. The mineral is fine — the moisture isn't, and nobody has published a way back.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A jar turned to one gold rock before a party. The mineral is fine — the moisture isn't, and nobody has published a way back.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>clumped edible glitter, fix clumped glitter, edible glitter storage, drink glitter clumping, bar storage edible glitter, edible glitter humidity, cocktail glitter tips</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/704cfea2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Green Edible Glitter for Cakes: Pistachio Now, Christmas Next</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>81</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>81</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Green Edible Glitter for Cakes: Pistachio Now, Christmas Next</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">490a53d0-72df-4ad4-9d1a-d846791e6f6a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bc2d9457</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which green edible glitter works for cakes, and when should you stock it? Green has two jobs this season, and they do not overlap.

The pistachio look — the soft, luxe green a client wants in any month — is a fine luster dust brushed on as a sheen, so the buttercream's own colour shows through and the green reads as a glow. The Christmas look is green next to red, and that wants flake: a scatter of green points reads festive from across a room. Buy the jar in October and it works twice, because green sits in the Halloween set with orange, purple and black, and then becomes red's most common companion in December. What the shade name does not tell you is what is in the jar. Some greens in this category are mica pigment only and some are built with certified dyes; only the label on the exact jar decides, and a cottage baker's ingredient label copies that declaration word for word.

In this episode:
- Why pistachio wants a sheen and Christmas wants a scatter
- Green's seasonal jump in the brand's own basket data, and why it travels with red
- Dana's winning round: "green" is not an ingredient, and what to write on your labels
- Three rules for batch consistency across a whole event
- The per-gram board, and how to get your own per-cupcake number in a dozen

Who should skip it: December menus built on red velvet and gold, exact colour matches without a swatch, and anyone buying on a trend guide instead of their own order book.

MONÉGASQUE Green 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which green edible glitter works for cakes, and when should you stock it? Green has two jobs this season, and they do not overlap.

The pistachio look — the soft, luxe green a client wants in any month — is a fine luster dust brushed on as a sheen, so the buttercream's own colour shows through and the green reads as a glow. The Christmas look is green next to red, and that wants flake: a scatter of green points reads festive from across a room. Buy the jar in October and it works twice, because green sits in the Halloween set with orange, purple and black, and then becomes red's most common companion in December. What the shade name does not tell you is what is in the jar. Some greens in this category are mica pigment only and some are built with certified dyes; only the label on the exact jar decides, and a cottage baker's ingredient label copies that declaration word for word.

In this episode:
- Why pistachio wants a sheen and Christmas wants a scatter
- Green's seasonal jump in the brand's own basket data, and why it travels with red
- Dana's winning round: "green" is not an ingredient, and what to write on your labels
- Three rules for batch consistency across a whole event
- The per-gram board, and how to get your own per-cupcake number in a dozen

Who should skip it: December menus built on red velvet and gold, exact colour matches without a swatch, and anyone buying on a trend guide instead of their own order book.

MONÉGASQUE Green 15 gram luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bc2d9457/ad342d07.mp3" length="8289673" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>517</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Green has two jobs this season — a pistachio sheen and a Christmas scatter — and one jar will not do both.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Green has two jobs this season — a pistachio sheen and a Christmas scatter — and one jar will not do both.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>green edible glitter, green luster dust, pistachio cake, Christmas cake glitter, edible glitter for cakes, cottage bakery ingredient label, Halloween green glitter, holiday cake decorating</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bc2d9457/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Buttercream: Fat, Timing, and the Crust</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>80</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Buttercream: Fat, Timing, and the Crust</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1100762a-4465-4f85-8385-23900c36c09b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/59ba3cc7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter survive on piped buttercream, or does it sink in? It survives, on two conditions, and both are about fat.

Buttercream is sugar and butter, and this powder absorbs fat: the gold luster dust's technical data sheet lists oil absorption at 70 to 90 grams of oil per 100 grams of powder. Dust a swirl the second it is piped and the butterfat coats every particle, so the shine goes flat — the cake did not reject the shimmer, it wrapped it. Condition one is timing: on an American buttercream, wait for the crust and then dry-brush. Condition two is the grade: large flake catches light in the ridges even while the buttercream is fresh, while fine dust needs the set surface. Meringue buttercreams do not crust, so they get chilled, brushed lightly, and a softer result.

In this episode:
- The one spec-sheet number that explains a beige unicorn cake
- Which buttercream crusts and which never will, and what to do about each
- Three ways decorators put dust on buttercream: dry brush, spirit paint, airbrush
- Why the bowl method wastes the jar, and why the fridge undoes the finish
- What a birthday cake costs in shimmer, per gram, and which jar is the honest buy

Who should skip it: cakes that go back into the fridge after decorating, non-crusting buttercream in a hot kitchen, and matte briefs.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter survive on piped buttercream, or does it sink in? It survives, on two conditions, and both are about fat.

Buttercream is sugar and butter, and this powder absorbs fat: the gold luster dust's technical data sheet lists oil absorption at 70 to 90 grams of oil per 100 grams of powder. Dust a swirl the second it is piped and the butterfat coats every particle, so the shine goes flat — the cake did not reject the shimmer, it wrapped it. Condition one is timing: on an American buttercream, wait for the crust and then dry-brush. Condition two is the grade: large flake catches light in the ridges even while the buttercream is fresh, while fine dust needs the set surface. Meringue buttercreams do not crust, so they get chilled, brushed lightly, and a softer result.

In this episode:
- The one spec-sheet number that explains a beige unicorn cake
- Which buttercream crusts and which never will, and what to do about each
- Three ways decorators put dust on buttercream: dry brush, spirit paint, airbrush
- Why the bowl method wastes the jar, and why the fridge undoes the finish
- What a birthday cake costs in shimmer, per gram, and which jar is the honest buy

Who should skip it: cakes that go back into the fridge after decorating, non-crusting buttercream in a hot kitchen, and matte briefs.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/59ba3cc7/9209876c.mp3" length="15363628" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>959</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It survives — if you wait for the crust. Dust a fresh swirl and the butterfat wraps every particle, and the shine goes flat.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It survives — if you wait for the crust. Dust a fresh swirl and the butterfat wraps every particle, and the shine goes flat.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter on buttercream, luster dust buttercream, crusting buttercream, Swiss meringue buttercream shimmer, dry brush luster dust, buttercream cake decorating, edible glitter cake, unicorn cake glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/59ba3cc7/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can You Put Edible Glitter on Macarons Before Baking?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>79</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Can You Put Edible Glitter on Macarons Before Baking?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c978455c-eaf4-417a-8482-3ed3927a8670</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/50a48a02</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter on macarons before baking? Yes, and before is the better moment.

Decorating guidance is consistent on this: the dense piped batter holds glitter applied before baking, and the shimmer bakes in. A freshly piped shell is wet, which is the only condition this powder ever needs, so you pipe, you dust, you rest, and the shells go into the oven already finished. The oven is not a risk — the mineral the powder is built on melts at around 3000 degrees Celsius. Doing it afterwards is where people lose a batch. To get dust onto a baked shell you have to bring tack back to a surface that has none, and the carrier for that has to be a high-proof clear alcohol that flashes off, not water: water soaks into a macaron shell and softens it. That is the same family of mistake as using water on dried royal icing, which pits, while water is exactly right on dried fondant. Three surfaces, three answers.

In this episode:
- Why a piped shell is the easiest surface in the category
- What actually ruined the batch that got brushed after cooling
- Dana's winning round: never add a variable to a bake that already fails for nine reasons
- The half-tray test that isolates the cause in one bake
- Which particle size stays on a smooth domed shell and which ends up in the box

Who should skip it: first-ever batches where the shells themselves are not working yet.

MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Before baking. The dense piped batter holds glitter applied at the piping stage and the shimmer bakes in; a piped shell is wet, which is the only thing this powder needs, and the oven does not affect it. After baking, the carrier has to be a high-proof clear alcohol rather than water, because water soaks into a macaron shell and softens it — the same mistake that pits dried royal icing, while water is correct on dried fondant.

- 00:00 Cold open — 40 shells, two days, 90 seconds
- 00:30 The verdict: before, and why
- 01:10 What the oven does to the pigment
- 01:40 Diagnosing the ruined batch: it was the liquid
- 02:40 Three surfaces, three different liquids
- 03:20 Dana's round: don't add variables to a temperamental bake
- 04:10 The half-tray test
- 04:50 Which jar for shells
- 05:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter on macarons before baking? Yes, and before is the better moment.

Decorating guidance is consistent on this: the dense piped batter holds glitter applied before baking, and the shimmer bakes in. A freshly piped shell is wet, which is the only condition this powder ever needs, so you pipe, you dust, you rest, and the shells go into the oven already finished. The oven is not a risk — the mineral the powder is built on melts at around 3000 degrees Celsius. Doing it afterwards is where people lose a batch. To get dust onto a baked shell you have to bring tack back to a surface that has none, and the carrier for that has to be a high-proof clear alcohol that flashes off, not water: water soaks into a macaron shell and softens it. That is the same family of mistake as using water on dried royal icing, which pits, while water is exactly right on dried fondant. Three surfaces, three answers.

In this episode:
- Why a piped shell is the easiest surface in the category
- What actually ruined the batch that got brushed after cooling
- Dana's winning round: never add a variable to a bake that already fails for nine reasons
- The half-tray test that isolates the cause in one bake
- Which particle size stays on a smooth domed shell and which ends up in the box

Who should skip it: first-ever batches where the shells themselves are not working yet.

MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Before baking. The dense piped batter holds glitter applied at the piping stage and the shimmer bakes in; a piped shell is wet, which is the only thing this powder needs, and the oven does not affect it. After baking, the carrier has to be a high-proof clear alcohol rather than water, because water soaks into a macaron shell and softens it — the same mistake that pits dried royal icing, while water is correct on dried fondant.

- 00:00 Cold open — 40 shells, two days, 90 seconds
- 00:30 The verdict: before, and why
- 01:10 What the oven does to the pigment
- 01:40 Diagnosing the ruined batch: it was the liquid
- 02:40 Three surfaces, three different liquids
- 03:20 Dana's round: don't add variables to a temperamental bake
- 04:10 The half-tray test
- 04:50 Which jar for shells
- 05:30 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/50a48a02/4292a249.mp3" length="5442527" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>339</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yes — and before is the better moment. Doing it afterwards is what turns forty shells into wet cardboard.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yes — and before is the better moment. Doing it afterwards is what turns forty shells into wet cardboard.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter on macarons, glitter before baking macarons, luster dust macarons, macaron decorating, gold macarons, edible glitter application, baking with edible glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/50a48a02/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pearlescent vs Metallic Cake Finish: Which Jar to Buy</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>78</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>78</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Pearlescent vs Metallic Cake Finish: Which Jar to Buy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">996b0735-c2b5-4519-a6b4-2d75965671e1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3a01c8af</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What separates a pearlescent cake finish from a metallic one? One number, and it is not printed on the jar: particle size.

Fine powder at 5 to 25 microns lies flat on a surface and reads as a continuous sheen — that is what people mean by pearlescent or metallic. Flake at 50 to 500 microns sits proud and throws individual points of light, which is sparkle: a different finish, not a stronger version of the first. Everything else on a label is describing colour. The glow itself is optical rather than pigmentary — the colour-additive listing describes the material as titanium salts deposited onto mica and then heated to produce titanium dioxide on mica, so light reflecting off the coating and off the platelet beneath interferes, which is why the effect shifts as you walk past the cake. There is no metallic gold in it; the technical data sheet is explicit that the warm tone comes from pigments layered on a mica substrate. On cost the answer inverts: the fine dust is cheaper per gram and dearer per cake, because a sheen covers a surface while a flake is a scatter.

In this episode:
- The one number that predicts the finish, and where it is published
- Dana's winning round: nobody prints microns on a jar
- The proxy that works — buy by what the product is sold for
- The per-gram board, and why per-cake reverses it
- Which finish suits fondant, and which suits swirled buttercream

Who should skip it: matte and velvet designs, one-cake buyers eyeing a 12-jar set, and anyone asked for gold leaf.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Particle size decides it. Luster dust at 5 to 25 microns lies flat and reads as a continuous sheen, which is the metallic or pearlescent finish people picture. Flake glitter at 50 to 500 microns sits proud and gives individual points of light, which is sparkle. Everything else on the label describes colour. Micron ranges live on technical data sheets rather than retail packaging, so the working proxy is what the product is sold for: drinks products are the large flake, cake dusts are the fine grade.

- 00:00 Cold open — the client asked for metallic and got a disco ball
- 00:30 The verdict: it is particle size
- 01:20 Why it looks like metal when there is no metal in it
- 02:20 Interference, and why the effect shifts as you move
- 03:00 Dana's round: nobody publishes the number
- 04:00 The proxy — buy by what it is sold for
- 05:00 The per-gram board
- 06:00 Why per-cake reverses the answer
- 07:00 Fondant versus swirled buttercream
- 07:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What separates a pearlescent cake finish from a metallic one? One number, and it is not printed on the jar: particle size.

Fine powder at 5 to 25 microns lies flat on a surface and reads as a continuous sheen — that is what people mean by pearlescent or metallic. Flake at 50 to 500 microns sits proud and throws individual points of light, which is sparkle: a different finish, not a stronger version of the first. Everything else on a label is describing colour. The glow itself is optical rather than pigmentary — the colour-additive listing describes the material as titanium salts deposited onto mica and then heated to produce titanium dioxide on mica, so light reflecting off the coating and off the platelet beneath interferes, which is why the effect shifts as you walk past the cake. There is no metallic gold in it; the technical data sheet is explicit that the warm tone comes from pigments layered on a mica substrate. On cost the answer inverts: the fine dust is cheaper per gram and dearer per cake, because a sheen covers a surface while a flake is a scatter.

In this episode:
- The one number that predicts the finish, and where it is published
- Dana's winning round: nobody prints microns on a jar
- The proxy that works — buy by what the product is sold for
- The per-gram board, and why per-cake reverses it
- Which finish suits fondant, and which suits swirled buttercream

Who should skip it: matte and velvet designs, one-cake buyers eyeing a 12-jar set, and anyone asked for gold leaf.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Particle size decides it. Luster dust at 5 to 25 microns lies flat and reads as a continuous sheen, which is the metallic or pearlescent finish people picture. Flake glitter at 50 to 500 microns sits proud and gives individual points of light, which is sparkle. Everything else on the label describes colour. Micron ranges live on technical data sheets rather than retail packaging, so the working proxy is what the product is sold for: drinks products are the large flake, cake dusts are the fine grade.

- 00:00 Cold open — the client asked for metallic and got a disco ball
- 00:30 The verdict: it is particle size
- 01:20 Why it looks like metal when there is no metal in it
- 02:20 Interference, and why the effect shifts as you move
- 03:00 Dana's round: nobody publishes the number
- 04:00 The proxy — buy by what it is sold for
- 05:00 The per-gram board
- 06:00 Why per-cake reverses the answer
- 07:00 Fondant versus swirled buttercream
- 07:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3a01c8af/aed444e4.mp3" length="8241600" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>514</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two words, one number behind them. Particle size decides whether a cake gets a sheen or a disco ball.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two words, one number behind them. Particle size decides whether a cake gets a sheen or a disco ball.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>pearlescent vs metallic, luster dust vs edible glitter, cake finish, metallic cake, particle size microns, edible glitter price per gram, cake decorating finishes, mica pearlescent pigment</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/3a01c8af/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are Food Dyes Being Phased Out? Reading Your Labels</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>77</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>77</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Are Food Dyes Being Phased Out? Reading Your Labels</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6e2ac34e-3802-40a9-9357-1e475abd0623</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fbfd9442</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Are synthetic food dyes being phased out? Three different things are happening and "banned" describes only one of them.

In April 2025, HHS and the FDA announced a set of measures to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the nation's food supply. Inside that announcement sit three separate mechanisms. A process was initiated to revoke authorization for two colorings, Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B. Six others — FD&amp;C Green No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1 and Blue No. 2 — are described as the agency working with industry to eliminate them from the food supply by the end of the following year. And companies were asked to remove FD&amp;C Red No. 3 sooner than already required. Red No. 3 is the genuine revocation: the order was issued on January 15, 2025, with food reformulation due by January 15, 2027 and ingested drugs by January 18, 2028. This episode reads the FDA's own sentences on the underlying data, explains the Delaney Clause, and gives the four sentences a food business can put in writing when a customer asks. It does not grade any product against the news — including ours.

In this episode:
- The three mechanisms, and why the distinction matters in writing
- What the Delaney Clause actually prohibits, and what it does not claim
- Why "certified" means part 74 and not "better"
- The four natural colour additives being fast-tracked
- Dana's winning round: the one question the show refuses to answer

Who should skip it: anyone waiting to be told which brands to avoid.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; the ingredient list is printed on the jar.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Three mechanisms are being described with one word. A process was initiated to revoke authorization for Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B; the FDA described working with industry to eliminate six other synthetic dyes from the food supply by the end of the following year; and FD&amp;C Red No. 3 was handled separately, with an order revoking its authorization issued on January 15, 2025. Only the last of those is a completed revocation, and the difference matters to anyone who has to answer a customer in writing.

- 00:00 Cold open — nine colorings, one wrong word
- 00:45 The verdict: three mechanisms, not one
- 02:00 The April 2025 announcement, action by action
- 03:30 The six dyes named
- 04:10 Dana's round: is a phase-out just a slow ban?
- 05:40 FD&amp;C Red No. 3: the real revocation and its dates
- 07:00 The Delaney Clause, enacted 1960
- 08:00 What the data actually shows, read out verbatim
- 09:30 The four natural additives being fast-tracked
- 10:30 Sparkle Lab: part 73 versus part 74, and what "certified" means
- 12:30 The bakery scenario: four sentences to send a customer
- 14:00 Dana's second round, and the refusal
- 16:00 The four-check reading method
- 17:00 The claim that cannot be true of any finished product
- 17:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Are synthetic food dyes being phased out? Three different things are happening and "banned" describes only one of them.

In April 2025, HHS and the FDA announced a set of measures to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the nation's food supply. Inside that announcement sit three separate mechanisms. A process was initiated to revoke authorization for two colorings, Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B. Six others — FD&amp;C Green No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1 and Blue No. 2 — are described as the agency working with industry to eliminate them from the food supply by the end of the following year. And companies were asked to remove FD&amp;C Red No. 3 sooner than already required. Red No. 3 is the genuine revocation: the order was issued on January 15, 2025, with food reformulation due by January 15, 2027 and ingested drugs by January 18, 2028. This episode reads the FDA's own sentences on the underlying data, explains the Delaney Clause, and gives the four sentences a food business can put in writing when a customer asks. It does not grade any product against the news — including ours.

In this episode:
- The three mechanisms, and why the distinction matters in writing
- What the Delaney Clause actually prohibits, and what it does not claim
- Why "certified" means part 74 and not "better"
- The four natural colour additives being fast-tracked
- Dana's winning round: the one question the show refuses to answer

Who should skip it: anyone waiting to be told which brands to avoid.

MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; the ingredient list is printed on the jar.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Three mechanisms are being described with one word. A process was initiated to revoke authorization for Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B; the FDA described working with industry to eliminate six other synthetic dyes from the food supply by the end of the following year; and FD&amp;C Red No. 3 was handled separately, with an order revoking its authorization issued on January 15, 2025. Only the last of those is a completed revocation, and the difference matters to anyone who has to answer a customer in writing.

- 00:00 Cold open — nine colorings, one wrong word
- 00:45 The verdict: three mechanisms, not one
- 02:00 The April 2025 announcement, action by action
- 03:30 The six dyes named
- 04:10 Dana's round: is a phase-out just a slow ban?
- 05:40 FD&amp;C Red No. 3: the real revocation and its dates
- 07:00 The Delaney Clause, enacted 1960
- 08:00 What the data actually shows, read out verbatim
- 09:30 The four natural additives being fast-tracked
- 10:30 Sparkle Lab: part 73 versus part 74, and what "certified" means
- 12:30 The bakery scenario: four sentences to send a customer
- 14:00 Dana's second round, and the refusal
- 16:00 The four-check reading method
- 17:00 The claim that cannot be true of any finished product
- 17:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fbfd9442/68bd8a24.mp3" length="16707361" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1043</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Three different mechanisms, one word doing all the work. Only one of them is actually a revocation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Three different mechanisms, one word doing all the work. Only one of them is actually a revocation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>food dye phase out, synthetic food dyes, FD&amp;C Red No. 3, Delaney Clause, certified color additives, part 73 part 74, natural food colour alternatives, baking supplies labels, ingredient list check</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fbfd9442/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Fondant That Has Already Dried</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>76</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>76</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Fondant That Has Already Dried</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">52123038-0269-4bf9-bd20-9614f98ab8e5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/29e4a365</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you get edible glitter to stick to fondant that has already dried? Brush on a thin, even layer of water.

Freshly rolled fondant is still soft and slightly tacky, so it holds glitter on its own. Once it has cured it is a closed surface, and water is what reopens it. The warning that comes with that guidance is the part people skip: too much water creates overly sticky spots that attract clumps of glitter, so the failure mode is not subtle — you get leopard print. The method that works on a large cake is to stop treating it as one surface and work a hand's width at a time: brush a panel, dust it, move on, exactly as you would with royal icing or freshly dipped chocolate. And fondant is the forgiving surface — if it goes wrong, let it dry back and try again. You cannot do that with royal icing, where water pits the surface permanently, which is why decorators reach for high-proof alcohol there instead. Same problem, opposite liquid.

In this episode:
- Why dried fondant needs water and fresh fondant needs nothing
- Dana's winning round: nobody can keep a whole tier evenly wet
- The panel-at-a-time method for a three-tier cake
- Why water rescues fondant and ruins royal icing
- Which particle size gives a fondant panel a sheen rather than specks

Who should skip it: cakes held in a cold room before service, and matte or velvet finishes.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Brush on a thin, even layer of water with a soft brush. Dried fondant is a closed surface and water reactivates its tackiness; freshly rolled fondant holds glitter without help. Too much water makes sticky spots that attract clumps, so work a hand's width at a time rather than trying to wet a whole tier evenly. Water is correct here and wrong on royal icing, where it pits the surface — decorators use high-proof alcohol for that.

- 00:00 Cold open — shaking a jar at a wall
- 00:25 The verdict: water, thinly
- 00:55 Why too much water is worse than none
- 01:30 Dana's round: a tier cannot be kept evenly wet
- 02:20 The panel-at-a-time method
- 03:00 Fondant forgives; royal icing does not
- 03:40 Does the powder dissolve? No
- 04:20 Which jar: fine dust versus flake
- 04:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you get edible glitter to stick to fondant that has already dried? Brush on a thin, even layer of water.

Freshly rolled fondant is still soft and slightly tacky, so it holds glitter on its own. Once it has cured it is a closed surface, and water is what reopens it. The warning that comes with that guidance is the part people skip: too much water creates overly sticky spots that attract clumps of glitter, so the failure mode is not subtle — you get leopard print. The method that works on a large cake is to stop treating it as one surface and work a hand's width at a time: brush a panel, dust it, move on, exactly as you would with royal icing or freshly dipped chocolate. And fondant is the forgiving surface — if it goes wrong, let it dry back and try again. You cannot do that with royal icing, where water pits the surface permanently, which is why decorators reach for high-proof alcohol there instead. Same problem, opposite liquid.

In this episode:
- Why dried fondant needs water and fresh fondant needs nothing
- Dana's winning round: nobody can keep a whole tier evenly wet
- The panel-at-a-time method for a three-tier cake
- Why water rescues fondant and ruins royal icing
- Which particle size gives a fondant panel a sheen rather than specks

Who should skip it: cakes held in a cold room before service, and matte or velvet finishes.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Brush on a thin, even layer of water with a soft brush. Dried fondant is a closed surface and water reactivates its tackiness; freshly rolled fondant holds glitter without help. Too much water makes sticky spots that attract clumps, so work a hand's width at a time rather than trying to wet a whole tier evenly. Water is correct here and wrong on royal icing, where it pits the surface — decorators use high-proof alcohol for that.

- 00:00 Cold open — shaking a jar at a wall
- 00:25 The verdict: water, thinly
- 00:55 Why too much water is worse than none
- 01:30 Dana's round: a tier cannot be kept evenly wet
- 02:20 The panel-at-a-time method
- 03:00 Fondant forgives; royal icing does not
- 03:40 Does the powder dissolve? No
- 04:20 Which jar: fine dust versus flake
- 04:50 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/29e4a365/a2e04d45.mp3" length="4765428" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>297</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Covered the cake Thursday, glittering Friday, nothing sticks. The fix is water — and the fix for royal icing is not.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Covered the cake Thursday, glittering Friday, nothing sticks. The fix is water — and the fix for royal icing is not.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter on fondant, dried fondant glitter, luster dust fondant, fondant cake decorating, edible glitter application, cake shimmer finish, fondant water brush</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/29e4a365/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter for Mini Desserts: How Far a Jar Goes</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>75</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter for Mini Desserts: How Far a Jar Goes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b92278b-bb59-4150-af3a-844e4f2b19d0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/abf12016</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter does a tray of 48 mini desserts actually take? Far less than people buy — the constraint is colours, not grams.

One jar holds more powder than a table that size will ever consume, so the real decision is how many shades the table needs, and price per gram only settles the question once you know that. The board: the 7 gram luster dust is $9.99, about $1.43 a gram; the 10 gram drink glitter is $14.99, about $1.50 a gram; the 15 gram luster dust is also $14.99, which is $1.00 a gram, the cheapest single jar; and the 12-colour set is $59.99 for 84 grams, about 71 cents a gram — the cheapest gram in the range, and the worst buy if the table needs one shade. The number that actually decides your cost is the leftover: half an abandoned 15 gram jar is about $7.50 of product doing nothing, which quietly doubles the real price of the event. And the 0.1 gram serving figure on these listings is a drinks figure, not a measured dessert dose — treat it as scale, not instruction.

In this episode:
- The per-gram board, read out in full
- Dana's winning round: why price per gram is the wrong number for an event
- Servings by jar size, and the listing error on the 7 gram jars
- A three-shade plan for a 48-piece table in December
- Why this category's second-biggest complaint is container size

Who should skip it: dark chocolate-forward tables, cold-room pre-plating, and single-shade one-off events.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-colour gift set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** For a 48-piece dessert table you are buying colours, not grams — one jar is comfortably enough powder, so the decision is how many shades the table needs. Price per gram runs about $1.43 for the 7 gram jar, $1.50 for the 10 gram, $1.00 for the 15 gram and about 71 cents for the 12-colour set. The set wins when a table needs several shades and loses badly when it needs one, because unopened jars are not a saving.

- 00:00 Cold open — three jars in, three jars out
- 00:30 The verdict: colours, not grams
- 01:10 The per-gram board
- 02:00 When the set is the worst buy on it
- 02:40 Dana's round: the leftover is the real price
- 03:40 Half a jar, and what it costs
- 04:20 Dose: why 0.1 grams is a drinks figure
- 05:20 Why jars feel too small — the category's two big complaints
- 06:10 Servings by jar size, and a listing error
- 07:00 A three-shade plan for December
- 08:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter does a tray of 48 mini desserts actually take? Far less than people buy — the constraint is colours, not grams.

One jar holds more powder than a table that size will ever consume, so the real decision is how many shades the table needs, and price per gram only settles the question once you know that. The board: the 7 gram luster dust is $9.99, about $1.43 a gram; the 10 gram drink glitter is $14.99, about $1.50 a gram; the 15 gram luster dust is also $14.99, which is $1.00 a gram, the cheapest single jar; and the 12-colour set is $59.99 for 84 grams, about 71 cents a gram — the cheapest gram in the range, and the worst buy if the table needs one shade. The number that actually decides your cost is the leftover: half an abandoned 15 gram jar is about $7.50 of product doing nothing, which quietly doubles the real price of the event. And the 0.1 gram serving figure on these listings is a drinks figure, not a measured dessert dose — treat it as scale, not instruction.

In this episode:
- The per-gram board, read out in full
- Dana's winning round: why price per gram is the wrong number for an event
- Servings by jar size, and the listing error on the 7 gram jars
- A three-shade plan for a 48-piece table in December
- Why this category's second-biggest complaint is container size

Who should skip it: dark chocolate-forward tables, cold-room pre-plating, and single-shade one-off events.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-colour gift set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** For a 48-piece dessert table you are buying colours, not grams — one jar is comfortably enough powder, so the decision is how many shades the table needs. Price per gram runs about $1.43 for the 7 gram jar, $1.50 for the 10 gram, $1.00 for the 15 gram and about 71 cents for the 12-colour set. The set wins when a table needs several shades and loses badly when it needs one, because unopened jars are not a saving.

- 00:00 Cold open — three jars in, three jars out
- 00:30 The verdict: colours, not grams
- 01:10 The per-gram board
- 02:00 When the set is the worst buy on it
- 02:40 Dana's round: the leftover is the real price
- 03:40 Half a jar, and what it costs
- 04:20 Dose: why 0.1 grams is a drinks figure
- 05:20 Why jars feel too small — the category's two big complaints
- 06:10 Servings by jar size, and a listing error
- 07:00 A three-shade plan for December
- 08:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/abf12016/6ae52069.mp3" length="7450402" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>465</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A 48-piece dessert table does not run out of glitter. It runs out of colours — and that changes which jar to buy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A 48-piece dessert table does not run out of glitter. It runs out of colours — and that changes which jar to buy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for mini desserts, dessert table glitter, how far does edible glitter go, edible glitter price per gram, event dessert planning, luster dust gift set, glitter servings per jar</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/abf12016/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Meringue: Before or After Baking?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>74</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Meringue: Before or After Baking?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cb08af2b-ff2e-4092-8218-5175418a748d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a4e2482d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter go on meringue before or after baking? Before — and meringue is the one surface where there is no second chance.

Raw piped meringue is wet and sticky, which is the best adhesion this category ever offers, and the shimmer simply bakes in. A baked meringue is the opposite: the entire purpose of the long low bake is to drive moisture out, so a finished meringue is bone dry and has nothing left to hold powder. What makes meringue different from every other surface is that there is no liquid rescue afterwards. Dried fondant takes a thin brush of water. Dried royal icing takes high-proof alcohol, because water pits it. A meringue is a dried sugar foam, and water does not reactivate it — it dissolves it. The workaround, if you have already baked, is to dip the base in chocolate and let freshly dipped, still-warm chocolate carry the shimmer instead. Recipe guidance bakes meringue cookies at 225 degrees Fahrenheit for about 60 minutes and cools them in the turned-off oven; humidity, not glitter, is what ruins them.

In this episode:
- Why raw piped meringue is the easiest surface in the category and a baked one is the hardest
- Dana's winning round: humidity beats every technique here
- The Halloween plan that fits five Saturdays, including the last one
- Why a white ghost with white shimmer disappears, and what to use instead
- The dipped-chocolate workaround for meringues you have already baked

Who should skip it: torched meringue toppings, meringue made in wet weather, and kisses piped under an inch.

MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Before baking. Glitter goes onto piped meringue while it is still raw and wet, and it bakes in. A baked meringue is deliberately bone dry and holds nothing, and unlike fondant or royal icing there is no liquid that brings it back — water dissolves a meringue rather than reviving it. Bake at 225 degrees Fahrenheit for about 60 minutes, cool in the turned-off oven, and store airtight at room temperature, never in the fridge.

- 00:00 Cold open — the surface no application guide covers
- 00:35 The verdict: before, and why
- 01:20 What the oven does to the pigment: nothing
- 02:10 Dana's round: humidity versus technique
- 03:20 Why the glitter is the only thing on the tray that ignores the weather
- 04:10 There is no rescue for a baked meringue
- 05:00 The dipped-chocolate workaround
- 05:50 Halloween: five Saturdays, and a practice batch
- 06:50 Colours that read on white
- 07:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter go on meringue before or after baking? Before — and meringue is the one surface where there is no second chance.

Raw piped meringue is wet and sticky, which is the best adhesion this category ever offers, and the shimmer simply bakes in. A baked meringue is the opposite: the entire purpose of the long low bake is to drive moisture out, so a finished meringue is bone dry and has nothing left to hold powder. What makes meringue different from every other surface is that there is no liquid rescue afterwards. Dried fondant takes a thin brush of water. Dried royal icing takes high-proof alcohol, because water pits it. A meringue is a dried sugar foam, and water does not reactivate it — it dissolves it. The workaround, if you have already baked, is to dip the base in chocolate and let freshly dipped, still-warm chocolate carry the shimmer instead. Recipe guidance bakes meringue cookies at 225 degrees Fahrenheit for about 60 minutes and cools them in the turned-off oven; humidity, not glitter, is what ruins them.

In this episode:
- Why raw piped meringue is the easiest surface in the category and a baked one is the hardest
- Dana's winning round: humidity beats every technique here
- The Halloween plan that fits five Saturdays, including the last one
- Why a white ghost with white shimmer disappears, and what to use instead
- The dipped-chocolate workaround for meringues you have already baked

Who should skip it: torched meringue toppings, meringue made in wet weather, and kisses piped under an inch.

MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Before baking. Glitter goes onto piped meringue while it is still raw and wet, and it bakes in. A baked meringue is deliberately bone dry and holds nothing, and unlike fondant or royal icing there is no liquid that brings it back — water dissolves a meringue rather than reviving it. Bake at 225 degrees Fahrenheit for about 60 minutes, cool in the turned-off oven, and store airtight at room temperature, never in the fridge.

- 00:00 Cold open — the surface no application guide covers
- 00:35 The verdict: before, and why
- 01:20 What the oven does to the pigment: nothing
- 02:10 Dana's round: humidity versus technique
- 03:20 Why the glitter is the only thing on the tray that ignores the weather
- 04:10 There is no rescue for a baked meringue
- 05:00 The dipped-chocolate workaround
- 05:50 Halloween: five Saturdays, and a practice batch
- 06:50 Colours that read on white
- 07:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a4e2482d/478c3f7d.mp3" length="7382692" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>460</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Every application guide skips meringue. It is the one surface where the timing is not negotiable — and it is before.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Every application guide skips meringue. It is the one surface where the timing is not negotiable — and it is before.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter on meringue, meringue cookies, meringue ghosts, halloween meringue, glitter before baking, luster dust baking, meringue humidity, edible glitter application</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a4e2482d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Royal Icing: Fixing Patchy Coverage</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>73</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Royal Icing: Fixing Patchy Coverage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7d7ac119-a875-45c7-9c1e-3f07ae9db2ea</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8224d298</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why does edible glitter go on royal icing in patches? Because the icing is drying unevenly while you work — it is a queue problem, not a product problem.

Flooded royal icing skins over from the edges and from the thinnest places first. Flood a dozen cookies, start dusting at the first one, and by cookie seven the earliest cookies have closed at the rim and are still open in the middle. You dust the tray, you get shimmer in the centre and nothing at the edge, and it looks like the jar failed. Two fixes work. Shrink the batch — flood three, dust three — or, better for anyone doing six dozen on a Saturday, flood everything, let it set, then pipe fresh detail later and glitter only that. And stop shaking from the jar: a jar drops powder in slugs, a fine sieve breaks it into an even fall. For icing that has already dried, decorating guides mist with high-proof grain alcohol, or brush on fresh royal icing thinned to a honey consistency as glue. Never water — water pits royal icing.

In this episode:
- Why patchiness is a timing gradient across a tray, not a bad jar
- The sieve, the pump, and why the jar itself is the worst applicator
- Dana's winning round: how to glitter 72 cookies without adding an hour
- The rescue for cookies that already dried, and the liquid that ruins them
- Why 5 to 25 microns and 50 to 500 microns look like two different products

Who should skip it: matte designs, cookies shipped loose in boxes, and anyone buying a jar for one order with no use after it.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Patchy shimmer on royal icing is a queue problem. Icing skins over from the edges first, so a tray flooded all at once is at different stages by the time you dust it. Work in threes and fours, or flood everything, let it set, and glitter fresh piped detail instead. Apply through a fine sieve rather than shaking from the jar. For icing that has already dried, use high-proof alcohol or thinned fresh royal icing as the adhesive — never water, which pits the surface.

- 00:00 Cold open — 11 cookies out of 36
- 00:35 The verdict: it is the queue, not the jar
- 01:15 Why a flood skins from the edge inward
- 02:20 Working in threes and fours
- 03:10 Dana's round: six dozen on a Saturday
- 04:00 The professional answer — glitter the piped detail, not the flood
- 05:00 Rescuing cookies that already dried
- 06:10 Why water is the wrong liquid here
- 07:00 Particle size: sheen versus sparkle
- 08:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Why does edible glitter go on royal icing in patches? Because the icing is drying unevenly while you work — it is a queue problem, not a product problem.

Flooded royal icing skins over from the edges and from the thinnest places first. Flood a dozen cookies, start dusting at the first one, and by cookie seven the earliest cookies have closed at the rim and are still open in the middle. You dust the tray, you get shimmer in the centre and nothing at the edge, and it looks like the jar failed. Two fixes work. Shrink the batch — flood three, dust three — or, better for anyone doing six dozen on a Saturday, flood everything, let it set, then pipe fresh detail later and glitter only that. And stop shaking from the jar: a jar drops powder in slugs, a fine sieve breaks it into an even fall. For icing that has already dried, decorating guides mist with high-proof grain alcohol, or brush on fresh royal icing thinned to a honey consistency as glue. Never water — water pits royal icing.

In this episode:
- Why patchiness is a timing gradient across a tray, not a bad jar
- The sieve, the pump, and why the jar itself is the worst applicator
- Dana's winning round: how to glitter 72 cookies without adding an hour
- The rescue for cookies that already dried, and the liquid that ruins them
- Why 5 to 25 microns and 50 to 500 microns look like two different products

Who should skip it: matte designs, cookies shipped loose in boxes, and anyone buying a jar for one order with no use after it.

MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dusts are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Patchy shimmer on royal icing is a queue problem. Icing skins over from the edges first, so a tray flooded all at once is at different stages by the time you dust it. Work in threes and fours, or flood everything, let it set, and glitter fresh piped detail instead. Apply through a fine sieve rather than shaking from the jar. For icing that has already dried, use high-proof alcohol or thinned fresh royal icing as the adhesive — never water, which pits the surface.

- 00:00 Cold open — 11 cookies out of 36
- 00:35 The verdict: it is the queue, not the jar
- 01:15 Why a flood skins from the edge inward
- 02:20 Working in threes and fours
- 03:10 Dana's round: six dozen on a Saturday
- 04:00 The professional answer — glitter the piped detail, not the flood
- 05:00 Rescuing cookies that already dried
- 06:10 Why water is the wrong liquid here
- 07:00 Particle size: sheen versus sparkle
- 08:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8224d298/e28ef6ca.mp3" length="7548624" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>471</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Same jar, same hand, half the cookies patchy. It is not the glitter — it is the queue, and there are two fixes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Same jar, same hand, half the cookies patchy. It is not the glitter — it is the queue, and there are two fixes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter on royal icing, patchy glitter cookies, decorated sugar cookies, luster dust on cookies, royal icing decorating, edible glitter application, cookie decorating tips, dried royal icing glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/8224d298/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Cocktail Garnish Ideas That Work</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>72</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Cocktail Garnish Ideas That Work</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21bac2a6-6b5b-4709-807d-d8f373045d71</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/98f4ec79</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter cocktail garnishes actually work? Three rules cover almost every case: clear drink, small dose, visible motion.

Shimmer reads as movement rather than color. In a clear spirit-forward drink the flakes hang in the liquid and throw light back; in something cloudy or citrus-heavy the drink absorbs the light before it reaches them, which is why the category's own reviewers keep saying it works best with clear drinks. Dose is the serving figure printed on the listing — 0.1 grams, a pinch, doubled if you want richer color — which at the 10 gram jar's $14.99 standard price is about 15 cents a serving. And because the powder is denser than the liquid, a drink poured twenty minutes before it is handed over is a settled drink. Serve it unstirred and let the guest stir it, or stir it at the table. This year's cocktail coverage has a name for that: tableside presentation, the interactive garnish that turns a drink into a ritual moment.

In this episode:
- Four shimmer garnishes that read in a real glass
- Three that only work in a photograph
- Dana's winning round: 0.1 grams and 0.07% are not the same kind of number
- What the color-additive listing's beverage entry actually names — and what it excludes
- Why a shimmer serve adds no flavor at all
- Three bars that should skip the idea entirely

Who should skip it: cloudy citrus-forward menus, pre-poured trays that stand before service, and anyone wanting a garnish that adds flavor.

The MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Three rules. Use a clear drink, because cloudy and citrus-heavy drinks absorb the light before it reaches the flakes. Use the listing's 0.1 gram serving figure — a pinch, doubled for richer color. And serve it so somebody watches it move: hand it over unstirred or stir it at the table. Shimmer is motion, not color, and the powder is denser than the liquid, so a standing drink settles.

- 00:00 Cold open — the drink that gets filmed is the one that moves
- 00:40 The verdict: clear, small, and moving
- 01:20 Why cloudy and citrus drinks bury the effect
- 02:10 The martini glass, and why it suits this
- 02:50 What it tastes like: nothing
- 03:30 Four garnishes that work, including the tableside stir
- 05:00 Three that only work in photographs
- 06:00 Dose: 0.1 grams, and the measuring spoons in the basket
- 06:50 Dana's round: 0.1 grams versus 0.07%
- 07:50 What the beverage entry names, and what it excludes
- 08:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter cocktail garnishes actually work? Three rules cover almost every case: clear drink, small dose, visible motion.

Shimmer reads as movement rather than color. In a clear spirit-forward drink the flakes hang in the liquid and throw light back; in something cloudy or citrus-heavy the drink absorbs the light before it reaches them, which is why the category's own reviewers keep saying it works best with clear drinks. Dose is the serving figure printed on the listing — 0.1 grams, a pinch, doubled if you want richer color — which at the 10 gram jar's $14.99 standard price is about 15 cents a serving. And because the powder is denser than the liquid, a drink poured twenty minutes before it is handed over is a settled drink. Serve it unstirred and let the guest stir it, or stir it at the table. This year's cocktail coverage has a name for that: tableside presentation, the interactive garnish that turns a drink into a ritual moment.

In this episode:
- Four shimmer garnishes that read in a real glass
- Three that only work in a photograph
- Dana's winning round: 0.1 grams and 0.07% are not the same kind of number
- What the color-additive listing's beverage entry actually names — and what it excludes
- Why a shimmer serve adds no flavor at all
- Three bars that should skip the idea entirely

Who should skip it: cloudy citrus-forward menus, pre-poured trays that stand before service, and anyone wanting a garnish that adds flavor.

The MONÉGASQUE 10 gram drink glitters are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Three rules. Use a clear drink, because cloudy and citrus-heavy drinks absorb the light before it reaches the flakes. Use the listing's 0.1 gram serving figure — a pinch, doubled for richer color. And serve it so somebody watches it move: hand it over unstirred or stir it at the table. Shimmer is motion, not color, and the powder is denser than the liquid, so a standing drink settles.

- 00:00 Cold open — the drink that gets filmed is the one that moves
- 00:40 The verdict: clear, small, and moving
- 01:20 Why cloudy and citrus drinks bury the effect
- 02:10 The martini glass, and why it suits this
- 02:50 What it tastes like: nothing
- 03:30 Four garnishes that work, including the tableside stir
- 05:00 Three that only work in photographs
- 06:00 Dose: 0.1 grams, and the measuring spoons in the basket
- 06:50 Dana's round: 0.1 grams versus 0.07%
- 07:50 What the beverage entry names, and what it excludes
- 08:40 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/98f4ec79/3bbae83f.mp3" length="8326022" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>519</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Clear drink, small dose, and somebody watching it move. Shimmer is not a color — it is motion, and standing drinks lose it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Clear drink, small dose, and somebody watching it move. Shimmer is not a color — it is motion, and standing drinks lose it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter cocktail garnish, glitter cocktails, drink glitter, how much glitter per cocktail, tableside garnish, martini garnish, cocktail presentation, edible glitter for drinks, 21 CFR 73.350 beverages</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/98f4ec79/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Color Additives Are in Edible Glitter?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>71</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>What Color Additives Are in Edible Glitter?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41858caa-44d2-446b-9cda-b0cd43c75bc7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d0b31327</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What color additives are in edible glitter? Two kinds of thing — a mineral pigment for the shimmer, and food dyes for the color.

Across the whole MONÉGASQUE line the declared palette runs to seven items and no more: mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, and FD&amp;C Red No. 40, Blue No. 1, Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6. The mica is the sparkle, the flat light-bouncing base everything rides on. Titanium dioxide is the white that makes a powder read bright rather than dull. Iron oxide is the warm one, where gold and bronze come from. The FD&amp;C dyes are the actual color. Some shades carry no dye at all — the manufacturer's spec sheet lists White, Snow White, Iridescent Butterfly, Liquid Gold and Magic Rainbow as mineral pigment only. The FDA's own description of the category is broader, naming sugar, acacia, maltodextrin, cornstarch and food-approved color additives, because some makers build on a sugar or starch base instead.

In this episode:
- The seven-item declaration, and which item does which job
- Which shades carry no added dye at all
- Dust versus flakes: same chemistry, different grind
- Dana's winning round: an ingredient list is not proof of compliance
- What it means when a jar carries no ingredient list at all
- The one-sentence answer to give a client who asks

Who should skip it: anyone whose jar carries no ingredient list — that jar has already answered the question.

The MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dust jars are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Edible glitter is a mineral pigment that makes the shimmer plus, in colored shades, one or more FD&amp;C food dyes. The full declared palette across this line is seven items: mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, and FD&amp;C Red No. 40, Blue No. 1, Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6. Some shades are declared as mineral pigment only.

- 00:00 Cold open — the client asked, and the decorator froze
- 00:30 The verdict: seven declared items, no eighth thing
- 01:10 What the FDA says the category commonly contains
- 01:50 Which item is the sparkle and which is the color
- 02:40 Dust versus flakes: 5 to 25 microns against 50 to 500
- 03:20 Dana's round: is a list proof?
- 04:10 What "non-toxic" with no ingredient list actually means
- 04:50 Dana's Scorecard · the sentence for the client · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What color additives are in edible glitter? Two kinds of thing — a mineral pigment for the shimmer, and food dyes for the color.

Across the whole MONÉGASQUE line the declared palette runs to seven items and no more: mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, and FD&amp;C Red No. 40, Blue No. 1, Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6. The mica is the sparkle, the flat light-bouncing base everything rides on. Titanium dioxide is the white that makes a powder read bright rather than dull. Iron oxide is the warm one, where gold and bronze come from. The FD&amp;C dyes are the actual color. Some shades carry no dye at all — the manufacturer's spec sheet lists White, Snow White, Iridescent Butterfly, Liquid Gold and Magic Rainbow as mineral pigment only. The FDA's own description of the category is broader, naming sugar, acacia, maltodextrin, cornstarch and food-approved color additives, because some makers build on a sugar or starch base instead.

In this episode:
- The seven-item declaration, and which item does which job
- Which shades carry no added dye at all
- Dust versus flakes: same chemistry, different grind
- Dana's winning round: an ingredient list is not proof of compliance
- What it means when a jar carries no ingredient list at all
- The one-sentence answer to give a client who asks

Who should skip it: anyone whose jar carries no ingredient list — that jar has already answered the question.

The MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dust jars are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Edible glitter is a mineral pigment that makes the shimmer plus, in colored shades, one or more FD&amp;C food dyes. The full declared palette across this line is seven items: mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, and FD&amp;C Red No. 40, Blue No. 1, Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6. Some shades are declared as mineral pigment only.

- 00:00 Cold open — the client asked, and the decorator froze
- 00:30 The verdict: seven declared items, no eighth thing
- 01:10 What the FDA says the category commonly contains
- 01:50 Which item is the sparkle and which is the color
- 02:40 Dust versus flakes: 5 to 25 microns against 50 to 500
- 03:20 Dana's round: is a list proof?
- 04:10 What "non-toxic" with no ingredient list actually means
- 04:50 Dana's Scorecard · the sentence for the client · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d0b31327/7b5f5e00.mp3" length="5147856" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>321</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two categories, seven declared items, one sentence you can say to a client. And a list is a screening check, not proof.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two categories, seven declared items, one sentence you can say to a client. And a list is a screening check, not proof.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>what is edible glitter made of, edible glitter ingredients, color additives, mica pearlescent pigment, titanium dioxide, iron oxide, FD&amp;C colors, luster dust ingredients, ingredient list, cake business labeling</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d0b31327/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Red Dye 3 Banned? What Bakers Need to Check</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>70</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is Red Dye 3 Banned? What Bakers Need to Check</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1604151-078b-4cc1-80cd-ebf11ec6ef80</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/73c38d35</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is Red Dye 3 banned? Yes, by an FDA order dated January 15, 2025 — and the deadlines run to 2027 and 2028.

Both halves of that sentence matter. The FDA revoked the authorization for FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs, but food manufacturers have until January 15, 2027 to reformulate and ingested drugs until January 18, 2028, and product manufactured before the effective date may still be legally on the market afterwards. The legal trigger is the Delaney Clause, enacted in 1960, which prohibits FDA authorization of a color additive found to induce cancer in humans or animals. What the FDA actually says about the evidence is narrower than most headlines: the dye causes cancer in male laboratory rats exposed to high levels through a hormonal mechanism that occurs in male rats, studies in other animals or in humans did not show the same effect, and there is no evidence showing it causes cancer in humans. Both things are true at once, which is why the story keeps getting garbled.

In this episode:
- The two dates, and why a two-year runway is not a contradiction
- What the Delaney Clause actually tests, in plain language
- Why the dessert aisle is in scope — frostings and icings are named
- The four documents to ask a supplier for, in order
- Why an ingredient list is a screening check and not proof
- Dana's winning round: the comparison this show refuses to make

Who should skip it: home bakers baking a few times a year — the reformulation is the manufacturer's job, not yours.

The MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dust jars are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** The FDA issued an order on January 15, 2025 revoking the authorization for FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs. Food has until January 15, 2027 to reformulate, ingested drugs until January 18, 2028, and pre-deadline product can remain on the market after. The trigger is the 1960 Delaney Clause, not a finding of human harm: FDA states there is no evidence the dye causes cancer in humans.

- 00:00 Cold open — January 15, 2027 is a real deadline
- 00:50 The verdict: three sentences, with dates
- 01:40 The Delaney Clause: a switch, not a dial
- 02:40 What the FDA actually says the evidence shows
- 04:20 Objection one: why a banned thing gets a two-year runway
- 05:40 Objection two: why the glitter aisle should care
- 06:50 How the color system works — listings, not product approvals
- 08:30 Parts 73 and 74, and what "certified" means
- 10:20 The four documents, in order, and why the SDS is not the test
- 12:40 Dana's round: the comparison this show will not make
- 14:20 The villain — missing ingredient information
- 15:40 A real afternoon: the three-pile spreadsheet
- 17:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote · two teases]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is Red Dye 3 banned? Yes, by an FDA order dated January 15, 2025 — and the deadlines run to 2027 and 2028.

Both halves of that sentence matter. The FDA revoked the authorization for FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs, but food manufacturers have until January 15, 2027 to reformulate and ingested drugs until January 18, 2028, and product manufactured before the effective date may still be legally on the market afterwards. The legal trigger is the Delaney Clause, enacted in 1960, which prohibits FDA authorization of a color additive found to induce cancer in humans or animals. What the FDA actually says about the evidence is narrower than most headlines: the dye causes cancer in male laboratory rats exposed to high levels through a hormonal mechanism that occurs in male rats, studies in other animals or in humans did not show the same effect, and there is no evidence showing it causes cancer in humans. Both things are true at once, which is why the story keeps getting garbled.

In this episode:
- The two dates, and why a two-year runway is not a contradiction
- What the Delaney Clause actually tests, in plain language
- Why the dessert aisle is in scope — frostings and icings are named
- The four documents to ask a supplier for, in order
- Why an ingredient list is a screening check and not proof
- Dana's winning round: the comparison this show refuses to make

Who should skip it: home bakers baking a few times a year — the reformulation is the manufacturer's job, not yours.

The MONÉGASQUE 7 gram luster dust jars are on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** The FDA issued an order on January 15, 2025 revoking the authorization for FD&amp;C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs. Food has until January 15, 2027 to reformulate, ingested drugs until January 18, 2028, and pre-deadline product can remain on the market after. The trigger is the 1960 Delaney Clause, not a finding of human harm: FDA states there is no evidence the dye causes cancer in humans.

- 00:00 Cold open — January 15, 2027 is a real deadline
- 00:50 The verdict: three sentences, with dates
- 01:40 The Delaney Clause: a switch, not a dial
- 02:40 What the FDA actually says the evidence shows
- 04:20 Objection one: why a banned thing gets a two-year runway
- 05:40 Objection two: why the glitter aisle should care
- 06:50 How the color system works — listings, not product approvals
- 08:30 Parts 73 and 74, and what "certified" means
- 10:20 The four documents, in order, and why the SDS is not the test
- 12:40 Dana's round: the comparison this show will not make
- 14:20 The villain — missing ingredient information
- 15:40 A real afternoon: the three-pile spreadsheet
- 17:00 Who should skip it · Dana's Scorecard · footnote · two teases]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/73c38d35/51c65165.mp3" length="17207653" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1075</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yes, with dates attached — and no, it is not a finding of human harm. The difference is a clause written in 1960.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yes, with dates attached — and no, it is not a finding of human harm. The difference is a clause written in 1960.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>red dye 3 ban, FD&amp;C Red No. 3, erythrosine, Delaney Clause, color additive regulations, 21 CFR part 74, baking supplies compliance, ingredient declarations, certificate of analysis, supplier documentation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/73c38d35/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When to Buy Edible Glitter for Holiday Baking</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>69</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When to Buy Edible Glitter for Holiday Baking</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2fe9316-d4b6-43ef-9b78-3530aac5ee3f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fce48e4a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When should you buy edible glitter for holiday baking? By the end of November if the colors matter — Thanksgiving weekend is the practical deadline.

The reason is a calendar, not a scare. Category search demand peaks around December 14 at roughly two to three times the spring baseline, and it is not window shopping: Amazon Brand Analytics recorded roughly 2.6 to 3 times the unique customers in the 2025 holiday quarter compared with a typical quarter. Worse for planners, the country bakes the same two-color Christmas — orders of the Green jar rose roughly 7.6 times into that quarter, and Red and Green became each other's most common add-on. Two-day shipping is a genuine miracle, but it can only bring what is still on the shelf. If you need one jar and any festive shade will do, early December is still fine. If you need specific colors, several jars, or anything that has to be wrapped, the gift deadline is harder than the baking deadline and the order date moves earlier.

In this episode:
- The peak week, and what it actually looks like from the shelf
- Why the December buyer is a different person from the year-round baker
- Dana's winning round: one batch, any color, no calendar needed
- The full order calendar, walked backward from the 25th
- Why a jar bought in November is the same jar on Christmas Eve
- Two people who should skip the shopping trip entirely

Who should skip it: one-batch bakers who are flexible on color, and anyone whose last year's red, green and gold are still in the cabinet.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color gift set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Order by the end of November if your baking needs specific colors, several jars, or anything wrapped — Thanksgiving weekend is the sweet spot. One jar and flexible on shade? Early December is fine. Avoid shopping in the week of December 14, the peak week of the year at roughly two to three times the spring baseline, when specific shades run thin and fast shipping cannot restock them.

- 00:00 Cold open — December 14, and the bakers who already finished
- 00:45 The verdict: the order calendar in one paragraph
- 01:40 How big the December stampede actually is
- 02:40 The two-color Christmas, and what ran out last year
- 03:40 Dana's objection: two months of a jar in the cabinet
- 04:30 The gift buyer's harder deadline
- 05:40 Dana's winning round: one batch, any color
- 06:40 The calendar, walked backward from the 25th
- 07:40 Who should skip it
- 08:20 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next question]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When should you buy edible glitter for holiday baking? By the end of November if the colors matter — Thanksgiving weekend is the practical deadline.

The reason is a calendar, not a scare. Category search demand peaks around December 14 at roughly two to three times the spring baseline, and it is not window shopping: Amazon Brand Analytics recorded roughly 2.6 to 3 times the unique customers in the 2025 holiday quarter compared with a typical quarter. Worse for planners, the country bakes the same two-color Christmas — orders of the Green jar rose roughly 7.6 times into that quarter, and Red and Green became each other's most common add-on. Two-day shipping is a genuine miracle, but it can only bring what is still on the shelf. If you need one jar and any festive shade will do, early December is still fine. If you need specific colors, several jars, or anything that has to be wrapped, the gift deadline is harder than the baking deadline and the order date moves earlier.

In this episode:
- The peak week, and what it actually looks like from the shelf
- Why the December buyer is a different person from the year-round baker
- Dana's winning round: one batch, any color, no calendar needed
- The full order calendar, walked backward from the 25th
- Why a jar bought in November is the same jar on Christmas Eve
- Two people who should skip the shopping trip entirely

Who should skip it: one-batch bakers who are flexible on color, and anyone whose last year's red, green and gold are still in the cabinet.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color gift set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Order by the end of November if your baking needs specific colors, several jars, or anything wrapped — Thanksgiving weekend is the sweet spot. One jar and flexible on shade? Early December is fine. Avoid shopping in the week of December 14, the peak week of the year at roughly two to three times the spring baseline, when specific shades run thin and fast shipping cannot restock them.

- 00:00 Cold open — December 14, and the bakers who already finished
- 00:45 The verdict: the order calendar in one paragraph
- 01:40 How big the December stampede actually is
- 02:40 The two-color Christmas, and what ran out last year
- 03:40 Dana's objection: two months of a jar in the cabinet
- 04:30 The gift buyer's harder deadline
- 05:40 Dana's winning round: one batch, any color
- 06:40 The calendar, walked backward from the 25th
- 07:40 Who should skip it
- 08:20 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next question]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fce48e4a/ecf7f14e.mp3" length="8231979" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>514</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Thanksgiving weekend is the order date. Fast shipping can bring you a jar — it cannot restock a shade the whole country bought last week.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Thanksgiving weekend is the order date. Fast shipping can bring you a jar — it cannot restock a shade the whole country bought last week.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>when to buy edible glitter, holiday baking supplies, christmas cake decorating, edible glitter christmas colors, december baking planning, red and green luster dust, 12 color gift set, holiday gift deadline</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fce48e4a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on a Cupcake Tower: How Much You Need</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>68</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on a Cupcake Tower: How Much You Need</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ab2c01b9-cf1c-4fec-99d4-56c90271680f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4e61303b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter does a cupcake tower need? Far less than the jar's size suggests — a 100-cupcake tower is one jar.

The only serving figure printed on the listing is 0.1 grams, a pinch. Treat one cupcake as one pinch and the arithmetic falls out: a 7 gram jar covers about 70 cupcakes, a 15 gram jar about 150. At the 15 gram jar's $14.99 standard price that is $1.00 a gram, or about 10 cents of shimmer per cupcake — usually less than the paper liner. The per-gram rates flip most people's intuition: the small 7 gram jar is the most expensive gram in the line at about $1.43, while the 12-color set works out at about $0.71. The honest caveat is that 0.1 grams is a drinks serving figure rather than a measured per-cupcake dose, and technique moves it far more than the cupcake does — dusting from height wastes most of a jar, while a loaded, tapped-off brush covers several at once.

In this episode:
- The division, done out loud, for a 100-cupcake tower
- Why the small jar is the priciest gram in the line
- Dana's winning round: a pinch is a drinks figure, not a cupcake dose
- The timing window — wet icing takes shimmer, set icing does not
- Which metallics suit an all-white or ivory board this year
- Three cases where a tower should skip shimmer entirely

Who should skip it: towers frosted and chilled hours before assembly, matte or rustic briefs, and display pieces nobody will eat.

The MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dust jars are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Budget a pinch per cupcake. The only serving figure on the listing is 0.1 grams, so 100 cupcakes is about 10 grams — one 15 gram jar with room to spare, at roughly 10 cents of shimmer per cupcake. Per gram, the 7 gram jar is about $1.43, the 15 gram jar is $1.00 and the 12-color set about $0.71. Technique moves the real figure more than the cupcake does.

- 00:00 Cold open — 100 cupcakes and a jar the size of a shot glass
- 00:40 The verdict: one jar, about 10 cents a cupcake
- 01:20 All three sizes on the bench: $1.43, $1.00, $0.71 a gram
- 02:30 Dana's round: a pinch is a drinks serving figure
- 03:30 Dry-brushing, and why technique is the real variable
- 04:20 The timing window: wet icing versus set icing
- 05:30 Which metallic for an all-white board, and the mineral-only shades
- 06:40 Who should skip it — three cases
- 07:30 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next question]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter does a cupcake tower need? Far less than the jar's size suggests — a 100-cupcake tower is one jar.

The only serving figure printed on the listing is 0.1 grams, a pinch. Treat one cupcake as one pinch and the arithmetic falls out: a 7 gram jar covers about 70 cupcakes, a 15 gram jar about 150. At the 15 gram jar's $14.99 standard price that is $1.00 a gram, or about 10 cents of shimmer per cupcake — usually less than the paper liner. The per-gram rates flip most people's intuition: the small 7 gram jar is the most expensive gram in the line at about $1.43, while the 12-color set works out at about $0.71. The honest caveat is that 0.1 grams is a drinks serving figure rather than a measured per-cupcake dose, and technique moves it far more than the cupcake does — dusting from height wastes most of a jar, while a loaded, tapped-off brush covers several at once.

In this episode:
- The division, done out loud, for a 100-cupcake tower
- Why the small jar is the priciest gram in the line
- Dana's winning round: a pinch is a drinks figure, not a cupcake dose
- The timing window — wet icing takes shimmer, set icing does not
- Which metallics suit an all-white or ivory board this year
- Three cases where a tower should skip shimmer entirely

Who should skip it: towers frosted and chilled hours before assembly, matte or rustic briefs, and display pieces nobody will eat.

The MONÉGASQUE 15 gram luster dust jars are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Budget a pinch per cupcake. The only serving figure on the listing is 0.1 grams, so 100 cupcakes is about 10 grams — one 15 gram jar with room to spare, at roughly 10 cents of shimmer per cupcake. Per gram, the 7 gram jar is about $1.43, the 15 gram jar is $1.00 and the 12-color set about $0.71. Technique moves the real figure more than the cupcake does.

- 00:00 Cold open — 100 cupcakes and a jar the size of a shot glass
- 00:40 The verdict: one jar, about 10 cents a cupcake
- 01:20 All three sizes on the bench: $1.43, $1.00, $0.71 a gram
- 02:30 Dana's round: a pinch is a drinks serving figure
- 03:30 Dry-brushing, and why technique is the real variable
- 04:20 The timing window: wet icing versus set icing
- 05:30 Which metallic for an all-white board, and the mineral-only shades
- 06:40 Who should skip it — three cases
- 07:30 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next question]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4e61303b/db24ebb2.mp3" length="8351104" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>521</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A 100-cupcake tower is one jar, not three — about 10 cents of shimmer per cupcake. The schedule matters more than the shopping.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A 100-cupcake tower is one jar, not three — about 10 cents of shimmer per cupcake. The schedule matters more than the shopping.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter cupcake tower, how much luster dust per cupcake, dessert table decorating, luster dust price per gram, dry brushing luster dust, wedding dessert table, cupcake tower decorating, edible glitter cost per serving</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4e61303b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold vs Silver Edible Glitter: Which Metallic to Pick</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>67</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Gold vs Silver Edible Glitter: Which Metallic to Pick</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5c82b6f2-1877-472a-8fe5-436b2c0ec126</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2c705c1c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Gold or silver edible glitter? Match the metal to your table, not to a trend — and price will not break the tie.

Both 15 gram luster dust jars carry the same $14.99 standard price, so the decision is entirely visual. Warm palettes — chocolate, gingerbread, caramel, red velvet, candlelight — take gold. White and icy palettes take silver, where it reads as frost rather than decoration. Chemically the two jars are close to identical: mineral pigments layered on mica, with titanium dioxide providing the white flash. The difference is the warm pigment. Per the manufacturer's safety data sheet, gold luster dust runs 14 to 19% iron oxide, while the silver variant holds under 0.5%. Gold is silver with the warmth dialed in — and neither jar contains any metal at all.

In this episode:
- The pigment split that makes gold gold, read off the safety data sheet
- Why the price tie makes this a purely visual decision
- Dana's winning round: on a white or icy palette, silver is not the runner-up
- What buying data says about people who refuse to choose
- The napkin test, for anyone who cannot tell a warm table from a cool one
- Three people who should skip metallics entirely

Who should skip it: pastel or rainbow party palettes, anyone decorating one cake for one night who does not need the pair, and anyone making a display piece nobody will eat.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold and Silver 15 gram jars are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Match the metal to the table, not the trend. Warm palettes — chocolate, caramel, red velvet, candlelight — take gold; white and icy palettes take silver. Price does not break the tie: both 15 gram jars are $14.99 standard. Chemically they are nearly the same powder on a mica base, and the difference is iron oxide — 14 to 19% in gold, under 0.5% in silver.

- 00:00 Cold open — the difference is a pinch of rust
- 00:45 The verdict: match the metal to your table
- 01:30 The Sparkle Lab: mica, titanium dioxide, iron oxide
- 03:00 The case for gold on a warm December table
- 03:45 Dana's round: silver on white frosting reads as frost
- 04:40 The search-estimate round, and what an estimate is worth
- 06:00 The Classic Metallics duo, and Dana's objection to it
- 07:00 Who should skip metallics — three cases
- 07:50 The napkin test · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Gold or silver edible glitter? Match the metal to your table, not to a trend — and price will not break the tie.

Both 15 gram luster dust jars carry the same $14.99 standard price, so the decision is entirely visual. Warm palettes — chocolate, gingerbread, caramel, red velvet, candlelight — take gold. White and icy palettes take silver, where it reads as frost rather than decoration. Chemically the two jars are close to identical: mineral pigments layered on mica, with titanium dioxide providing the white flash. The difference is the warm pigment. Per the manufacturer's safety data sheet, gold luster dust runs 14 to 19% iron oxide, while the silver variant holds under 0.5%. Gold is silver with the warmth dialed in — and neither jar contains any metal at all.

In this episode:
- The pigment split that makes gold gold, read off the safety data sheet
- Why the price tie makes this a purely visual decision
- Dana's winning round: on a white or icy palette, silver is not the runner-up
- What buying data says about people who refuse to choose
- The napkin test, for anyone who cannot tell a warm table from a cool one
- Three people who should skip metallics entirely

Who should skip it: pastel or rainbow party palettes, anyone decorating one cake for one night who does not need the pair, and anyone making a display piece nobody will eat.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold and Silver 15 gram jars are on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Match the metal to the table, not the trend. Warm palettes — chocolate, caramel, red velvet, candlelight — take gold; white and icy palettes take silver. Price does not break the tie: both 15 gram jars are $14.99 standard. Chemically they are nearly the same powder on a mica base, and the difference is iron oxide — 14 to 19% in gold, under 0.5% in silver.

- 00:00 Cold open — the difference is a pinch of rust
- 00:45 The verdict: match the metal to your table
- 01:30 The Sparkle Lab: mica, titanium dioxide, iron oxide
- 03:00 The case for gold on a warm December table
- 03:45 Dana's round: silver on white frosting reads as frost
- 04:40 The search-estimate round, and what an estimate is worth
- 06:00 The Classic Metallics duo, and Dana's objection to it
- 07:00 Who should skip metallics — three cases
- 07:50 The napkin test · Dana's Scorecard · footnote]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2c705c1c/8d85c864.mp3" length="8629048" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>538</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Same jar, same price, and the only real difference is iron oxide. Your napkins decide this, not the trend.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Same jar, same price, and the only real difference is iron oxide. Your napkins decide this, not the trend.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>gold vs silver edible glitter, gold luster dust, silver luster dust, metallic cake decorating, edible glitter for christmas, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, mica pearlescent pigment, 21 CFR 73.350</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2c705c1c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Edible Glitter a Good Gift for Bakers? A Quick Answer</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>66</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is Edible Glitter a Good Gift for Bakers? A Quick Answer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5089bd3a-b2c6-4a60-8b29-080067af3cd3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9e545af2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter a good gift for someone who bakes? Yes, on one condition — she already bakes.

That condition does all the work. For a person who already decorates, edible glitter is the fun part of a job they already do: no new skill, no new appliance, no shelf space claimed by a machine. For someone who does not bake, it is the classic drawer gift, thanked for politely and never opened. The reassuring part is that this is not an invented present. In an analysis of about 2,400 reviews across this category, the most-mentioned person is "daughter" and the top occasion is the holidays — a parent buying sparkle for a kid who bakes is already one of the most common stories in the category. And the calendar agrees: Amazon Brand Analytics puts the holiday quarter at roughly 2.6 to 3 times the unique customers of a typical quarter.

In this episode:
- The one condition that decides the whole question
- Why a single $9.99 jar reads as a stocking stuffer, and the build-a-gift fix
- What gift-buyers actually put in the basket alongside a 12-color set
- Dana's winning round: you don't buy a carpenter a beginner hammer
- The three people you should not buy this for

Who should skip it: anyone buying for a non-baker, anyone unsure the recipient would eat shimmer on their food, and anyone shopping for a working decorator who already owns the palette — ask which shade she has run out of instead.

The MONÉGASQUE 7 gram baking line is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Edible glitter is a good gift on one condition: the recipient already bakes or hosts. For them it is the finishing touch on work they already do — no new skill, no new equipment. For a non-baker it is the jar that dies in a drawer. A single 7 gram jar at $9.99 reads as a stocking stuffer, so most gift-buyers pair it with brushes or gel colors, or start from the 12-color set.

- 00:00 Cold open — the listener question
- 00:30 The verdict: yes, on one condition
- 01:10 Why it isn't an invented gift: what 2,400 category reviews show
- 01:50 Dana's objection: a $9.99 jar reads cheap
- 02:30 The build-a-gift move, and what really rides along in the basket
- 03:10 Who should skip it — three people
- 04:00 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next question]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter a good gift for someone who bakes? Yes, on one condition — she already bakes.

That condition does all the work. For a person who already decorates, edible glitter is the fun part of a job they already do: no new skill, no new appliance, no shelf space claimed by a machine. For someone who does not bake, it is the classic drawer gift, thanked for politely and never opened. The reassuring part is that this is not an invented present. In an analysis of about 2,400 reviews across this category, the most-mentioned person is "daughter" and the top occasion is the holidays — a parent buying sparkle for a kid who bakes is already one of the most common stories in the category. And the calendar agrees: Amazon Brand Analytics puts the holiday quarter at roughly 2.6 to 3 times the unique customers of a typical quarter.

In this episode:
- The one condition that decides the whole question
- Why a single $9.99 jar reads as a stocking stuffer, and the build-a-gift fix
- What gift-buyers actually put in the basket alongside a 12-color set
- Dana's winning round: you don't buy a carpenter a beginner hammer
- The three people you should not buy this for

Who should skip it: anyone buying for a non-baker, anyone unsure the recipient would eat shimmer on their food, and anyone shopping for a working decorator who already owns the palette — ask which shade she has run out of instead.

The MONÉGASQUE 7 gram baking line is on Amazon at $9.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.

**Direct answer (top):** Edible glitter is a good gift on one condition: the recipient already bakes or hosts. For them it is the finishing touch on work they already do — no new skill, no new equipment. For a non-baker it is the jar that dies in a drawer. A single 7 gram jar at $9.99 reads as a stocking stuffer, so most gift-buyers pair it with brushes or gel colors, or start from the 12-color set.

- 00:00 Cold open — the listener question
- 00:30 The verdict: yes, on one condition
- 01:10 Why it isn't an invented gift: what 2,400 category reviews show
- 01:50 Dana's objection: a $9.99 jar reads cheap
- 02:30 The build-a-gift move, and what really rides along in the basket
- 03:10 Who should skip it — three people
- 04:00 Dana's Scorecard · footnote · next question]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9e545af2/fee16492.mp3" length="4729492" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>295</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It's a good gift on exactly one condition — and if that condition isn't met, it's the jar that dies in a drawer by February.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It's a good gift on exactly one condition — and if that condition isn't met, it's the jar that dies in a drawer by February.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter gift, gifts for bakers, baking gift ideas, luster dust set, edible glitter for cakes, holiday gifts for bakers, 12 color luster dust set, gift for someone who bakes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9e545af2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is a 12-Color Edible Glitter Gift Set Worth It?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>65</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is a 12-Color Edible Glitter Gift Set Worth It?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47c2a16a-4100-423b-9224-74a0d08830bc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d45611fa</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is a 12-color edible glitter gift set worth it? Per gram, yes, and it is not close — but that is the wrong question for a present.

Twelve 7 gram jars is 84 grams for $59.99, which works out at about $0.71 a gram against roughly $1.43 buying the same jars one at a time. The box quietly halves the price of every gram in it. The catch is that a gram only counts if somebody uses it, and a gift set is a bet on somebody else's oven. So the verdict is never abstract: it is worth it against a calendar. Count the recipient's real occasions out loud — kids' birthdays, the school bake sale, a cookie exchange, Christmas, the New Year's dessert table. Four without inventing anything and the maths is on your side. Stretching to reach two, and you have bought clutter with a bow on it.

In this episode:
- The division, done out loud: $0.71 a gram versus $1.43
- What a 7 gram jar actually is in servings, and what a tray of cookies really costs
- Dana's winning round: per-gram value is the baker's maths, not the gift buyer's
- What the co-purchases reveal about who is really buying this box
- The four people who should walk past it, including the drinks person
- Why sifter caps are the feature that earns its keep

Who should skip it: one-party decorators, anyone buying for a cocktail-focused recipient, a baker who already owns her colours, and anyone whose evidence that the recipient bakes is one pie in 2019.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-colour set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is a 12-color edible glitter gift set worth it? Per gram, yes, and it is not close — but that is the wrong question for a present.

Twelve 7 gram jars is 84 grams for $59.99, which works out at about $0.71 a gram against roughly $1.43 buying the same jars one at a time. The box quietly halves the price of every gram in it. The catch is that a gram only counts if somebody uses it, and a gift set is a bet on somebody else's oven. So the verdict is never abstract: it is worth it against a calendar. Count the recipient's real occasions out loud — kids' birthdays, the school bake sale, a cookie exchange, Christmas, the New Year's dessert table. Four without inventing anything and the maths is on your side. Stretching to reach two, and you have bought clutter with a bow on it.

In this episode:
- The division, done out loud: $0.71 a gram versus $1.43
- What a 7 gram jar actually is in servings, and what a tray of cookies really costs
- Dana's winning round: per-gram value is the baker's maths, not the gift buyer's
- What the co-purchases reveal about who is really buying this box
- The four people who should walk past it, including the drinks person
- Why sifter caps are the feature that earns its keep

Who should skip it: one-party decorators, anyone buying for a cocktail-focused recipient, a baker who already owns her colours, and anyone whose evidence that the recipient bakes is one pie in 2019.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-colour set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d45611fa/88dfbe65.mp3" length="8021329" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>500</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Per gram it's half the single-jar rate. But a gift set is a bet on somebody else's calendar — count four occasions or buy smaller.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Per gram it's half the single-jar rate. But a gift set is a bet on somebody else's calendar — count four occasions or buy smaller.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter gift set, 12 color luster dust set, gifts for bakers, edible glitter price per gram, baking gift ideas, christmas gifts for bakers, luster dust set, sifter cap, cake decorating gift, holiday gift guide</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d45611fa/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christmas Edible Glitter Colors: Red, Green, and Gold</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>64</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Christmas Edible Glitter Colors: Red, Green, and Gold</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb88b250-36be-4ff6-8073-b0df979dce7c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f3a44fe6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What are the best edible glitter colors for Christmas? Three — red, green and gold — with silver and white as the snow on top.

That is not a styling opinion. It is what December shopping behaviour shows: red and green become each other's most common add-on in the fourth quarter, and gold runs with silver the way it does all year. But the rule underneath the palette is the one people skip. Shimmer only reads against contrast. Red on red velvet disappears; red on white frosting is the whole effect. Green wants a pale cookie. Gold on dark gingerbread is the highest-contrast move on the table. And scale, not the calendar, decides how many jars you need — a quiet Christmas is one gold jar and the leftover pinches show up again at a birthday in March.

In this episode:
- Why contrast beats matching, and the same-on-same mistake that eats a whole jar of sparkle
- Dana's winning round: the three-jar palette is for the full production, not for one batch of cookies
- Where each colour actually goes across a baking weekend
- The metallic table — silver and white — and why it works for New Year's Eve too
- Who should walk past this aisle, including the cocoa-and-eggnog drinks menu
- The runway rule: pick the palette in November, bake in December

Who should skip it: display-only decorators, and anyone whose holiday drinks are opaque — shimmer needs a clear glass.

MONÉGASQUE holiday shades are on Amazon: Cherry Red, Emerald Green and Iconic Gold in 10 g glitter jars; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What are the best edible glitter colors for Christmas? Three — red, green and gold — with silver and white as the snow on top.

That is not a styling opinion. It is what December shopping behaviour shows: red and green become each other's most common add-on in the fourth quarter, and gold runs with silver the way it does all year. But the rule underneath the palette is the one people skip. Shimmer only reads against contrast. Red on red velvet disappears; red on white frosting is the whole effect. Green wants a pale cookie. Gold on dark gingerbread is the highest-contrast move on the table. And scale, not the calendar, decides how many jars you need — a quiet Christmas is one gold jar and the leftover pinches show up again at a birthday in March.

In this episode:
- Why contrast beats matching, and the same-on-same mistake that eats a whole jar of sparkle
- Dana's winning round: the three-jar palette is for the full production, not for one batch of cookies
- Where each colour actually goes across a baking weekend
- The metallic table — silver and white — and why it works for New Year's Eve too
- Who should walk past this aisle, including the cocoa-and-eggnog drinks menu
- The runway rule: pick the palette in November, bake in December

Who should skip it: display-only decorators, and anyone whose holiday drinks are opaque — shimmer needs a clear glass.

MONÉGASQUE holiday shades are on Amazon: Cherry Red, Emerald Green and Iconic Gold in 10 g glitter jars; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f3a44fe6/53c66c46.mp3" length="8851820" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>552</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Christmas palette is three jars — and there's an honest case that a small Christmas only needs one.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Christmas palette is three jars — and there's an honest case that a small Christmas only needs one.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>christmas edible glitter colors, holiday baking glitter, red green gold glitter, christmas cookie decorating, edible glitter palette, holiday dessert table, gold edible glitter, silver edible glitter, new year's eve desserts, christmas baking</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/f3a44fe6/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Dust Pump: Do You Actually Need One?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>63</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Dust Pump: Do You Actually Need One?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b74df7fc-6256-41fa-9305-31664563a0a6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c375dec8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do you need an edible glitter dust pump? For most people, no — and the category has quietly answered this already.

Spray pumps appear on only two products among this niche's top twenty, despite years of opportunity to become standard. What buyers actually keep asking for is far simpler: shaker or sprinkle-top lids, and a spoon in the box. Ease of use is the single biggest driver of positive reviews in this category, appearing in 73.8 percent of positive mentions — people do not rave about pigment, they rave about a product being easy. This episode says plainly that MONÉGASQUE makes no pump, and then answers the question that actually matters for anyone applying shimmer at volume: what gives the same result in three different people's hands on a busy service.

In this episode:
- Why the request in this category is "a better lid", not "a machine"
- Dana's winning round: at volume the constraint is repeatability, and "use a brush" is not a plan across shifts
- The volume setup — a measured decant and a fine sieve, with brushes reserved for placed detail
- Why particle size decides whether any applicator works: 5 to 25 microns versus 50 to 500
- Why anything clipped to the jar is a moisture route, and decanting protects the container
- Where the sieve pass belongs in the line, and why timing ruins volume work

Who should skip it: anyone decorating one or two things at a time — you already own a spoon and a brush — and anyone whose real problem is a clumped jar, which is storage, not equipment.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-colour luster dust set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard, with a sifter cap on every jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Do you need an edible glitter dust pump? For most people, no — and the category has quietly answered this already.

Spray pumps appear on only two products among this niche's top twenty, despite years of opportunity to become standard. What buyers actually keep asking for is far simpler: shaker or sprinkle-top lids, and a spoon in the box. Ease of use is the single biggest driver of positive reviews in this category, appearing in 73.8 percent of positive mentions — people do not rave about pigment, they rave about a product being easy. This episode says plainly that MONÉGASQUE makes no pump, and then answers the question that actually matters for anyone applying shimmer at volume: what gives the same result in three different people's hands on a busy service.

In this episode:
- Why the request in this category is "a better lid", not "a machine"
- Dana's winning round: at volume the constraint is repeatability, and "use a brush" is not a plan across shifts
- The volume setup — a measured decant and a fine sieve, with brushes reserved for placed detail
- Why particle size decides whether any applicator works: 5 to 25 microns versus 50 to 500
- Why anything clipped to the jar is a moisture route, and decanting protects the container
- Where the sieve pass belongs in the line, and why timing ruins volume work

Who should skip it: anyone decorating one or two things at a time — you already own a spoon and a brush — and anyone whose real problem is a clumped jar, which is storage, not equipment.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-colour luster dust set is on Amazon at $59.99 standard, with a sifter cap on every jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c375dec8/223ee3c7.mp3" length="6295162" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two of the category's top 20 products have a pump. The volume answer isn't a gadget — it's a measured decant and a sieve.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two of the category's top 20 products have a pump. The volume answer isn't a gadget — it's a measured decant and a sieve.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter dust pump, luster dust applicator, glitter shaker lid, sifter cap, applying edible glitter at volume, bakery production, cake decorating tools, luster dust sieve, drink glitter applicator, bar programme</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c375dec8/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Edible Glitter Bleeds Color Into Icing</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>62</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Edible Glitter Bleeds Color Into Icing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e1ba0888-f22c-4033-b180-e591f4cf84fc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ea1406d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why does edible glitter colour bleed into icing overnight? Usually because water got involved — and often because the colour that moved was never in the glitter.

Mica-based pearlescent pigment is almost insoluble in water. It sits on a surface rather than dissolving into one, so on its own it has nothing to migrate with. When colour creeps outwards after decorating, two things are almost always involved: moisture, which softens a set sugar surface and carries whatever is soluble sideways, and the gel colour already in tinted buttercream or royal icing, which very often travels upward into the decoration rather than the other way round. From above, both look identical — which is why the jar gets blamed.

In this episode:
- The mechanism, in one line: dye migrates, mineral pigment does not
- Dana's winning round: four FD&amp;C dyes are declared in this line, so "it's never the glitter" is not a promise anyone can make
- The five shades our spec sheet lists as pearlescent pigment only
- Three changes for Monday: spirit instead of water, cure tinted icing first, dry dish and dry brush
- Why storage after decorating is the moment people forget
- What the category's colour complaints actually add up to

Who should skip it: same-day decorators working on white or ivory, and anyone dusting chocolate rather than icing — no water, no sugar, nothing to move through.

MONÉGASQUE Snow White drink glitter, 10 g, is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Why does edible glitter colour bleed into icing overnight? Usually because water got involved — and often because the colour that moved was never in the glitter.

Mica-based pearlescent pigment is almost insoluble in water. It sits on a surface rather than dissolving into one, so on its own it has nothing to migrate with. When colour creeps outwards after decorating, two things are almost always involved: moisture, which softens a set sugar surface and carries whatever is soluble sideways, and the gel colour already in tinted buttercream or royal icing, which very often travels upward into the decoration rather than the other way round. From above, both look identical — which is why the jar gets blamed.

In this episode:
- The mechanism, in one line: dye migrates, mineral pigment does not
- Dana's winning round: four FD&amp;C dyes are declared in this line, so "it's never the glitter" is not a promise anyone can make
- The five shades our spec sheet lists as pearlescent pigment only
- Three changes for Monday: spirit instead of water, cure tinted icing first, dry dish and dry brush
- Why storage after decorating is the moment people forget
- What the category's colour complaints actually add up to

Who should skip it: same-day decorators working on white or ivory, and anyone dusting chocolate rather than icing — no water, no sugar, nothing to move through.

MONÉGASQUE Snow White drink glitter, 10 g, is on Amazon at $14.99 standard; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6ea1406d/6aaf8066.mp3" length="5946575" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>371</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bleeding is what dye does, and mineral pigment isn't dye. The two real suspects are moisture and your own tinted icing.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bleeding is what dye does, and mineral pigment isn't dye. The two real suspects are moisture and your own tinted icing.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter color bleeding, luster dust bleeding into icing, royal icing color bleed, cake decorating troubleshooting, luster dust paint, edible glitter on buttercream, cookie decorating problems, mica pigment, food colour migration, pro cake decorating</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ea1406d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gender Reveal Edible Glitter: Pink, Blue, and Timing</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>61</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Gender Reveal Edible Glitter: Pink, Blue, and Timing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5bc3c99d-8bb4-42d2-9867-87855e058462</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9021221f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter colours work for a gender reveal? Two jars and one rule — and the rule is about contrast, not about matching your theme.

Pink and blue are the obvious pair, and pink is the most-searched glitter colour by a wide margin in third-party estimates. But the shade only matters relative to what it is sitting on: pale pink shimmer on pink buttercream disappears, and the same jar on white frosting is the entire effect. Incorrect colour accounts for 17.6 percent of negative review mentions in this category, and a good share of that is the right jar losing a fight with the wrong background. For a reveal, buy both colours even though one stays sealed — the person decorating usually is not the person who knows.

In this episode:
- Which pinks and blues are actually different products: Baby Pink, Sakura Pink, Hot Pink, Rose Gold, Ocean Blue, Skyline Blue
- Snow White as the planning trick — dress the table early, add the colour last
- Decide the background first, then the shimmer, and when to reach for a metallic instead
- Dana's winning round: a party is three warm hours, not a photograph — what actually survives it
- Why decorating the night before turns sprinkling into a brushing job
- The countdown: order at least a week out, and what to do about the punch

Who should skip it: anyone whose reveal is the balloon, and anyone whose table is already busy with sprinkles and toppers. Shimmer works on a calm surface.

MONÉGASQUE Baby Pink and Ocean Blue drink glitter, 10 g, are on Amazon at $14.99 standard each; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter colours work for a gender reveal? Two jars and one rule — and the rule is about contrast, not about matching your theme.

Pink and blue are the obvious pair, and pink is the most-searched glitter colour by a wide margin in third-party estimates. But the shade only matters relative to what it is sitting on: pale pink shimmer on pink buttercream disappears, and the same jar on white frosting is the entire effect. Incorrect colour accounts for 17.6 percent of negative review mentions in this category, and a good share of that is the right jar losing a fight with the wrong background. For a reveal, buy both colours even though one stays sealed — the person decorating usually is not the person who knows.

In this episode:
- Which pinks and blues are actually different products: Baby Pink, Sakura Pink, Hot Pink, Rose Gold, Ocean Blue, Skyline Blue
- Snow White as the planning trick — dress the table early, add the colour last
- Decide the background first, then the shimmer, and when to reach for a metallic instead
- Dana's winning round: a party is three warm hours, not a photograph — what actually survives it
- Why decorating the night before turns sprinkling into a brushing job
- The countdown: order at least a week out, and what to do about the punch

Who should skip it: anyone whose reveal is the balloon, and anyone whose table is already busy with sprinkles and toppers. Shimmer works on a calm surface.

MONÉGASQUE Baby Pink and Ocean Blue drink glitter, 10 g, are on Amazon at $14.99 standard each; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9021221f/31d9b775.mp3" length="9143555" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>571</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Buy both colours, decide the background before the shade, and order a week out. The date does not move.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Buy both colours, decide the background before the shade, and order a week out. The date does not move.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>gender reveal edible glitter, baby shower edible glitter colors, pink edible glitter, blue edible glitter, gender reveal dessert table, baby shower cake decorating, edible glitter colors, party planning, reveal cake, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9021221f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Isn't My Edible Glitter Sticking? Fix the Timing</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>60</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Isn't My Edible Glitter Sticking? Fix the Timing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c64b0efa-9063-48c6-91c6-7d760ffbf3a5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/aea17b06</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why isn't my edible glitter sticking? Almost always the surface, not the glitter — and you were about four minutes late.

Shimmer powders adhere best to icing that is still wet and glossy. Once a surface has set and dried it takes far less, and the rest ends up on the counter. The pigment is almost insoluble in water, chemically stable and heat-stable: it never dissolves into a surface or becomes part of it, so it only stays where something holds it mechanically. That makes sticking entirely a surface question — and it means there are three methods, not one, with the right method decided by the surface you already have.

In this episode:
- The rule that fixes it: sprinkle wet, brush dry, paint when you want it exactly somewhere
- Dana's winning round: "wet and glossy" and "dry-brush a set surface" are opposite instructions — here's why both are true
- The clear high-proof spirit method, and why alcohol rather than water
- Why chocolate drinks the powder — 70 to 90 grams of oil per 100 grams — and comes out softer
- Fine dust at 5 to 25 microns versus flakes at 50 to 500, and which techniques each one can actually do
- Why working from a dish instead of the jar protects the jar

Who should skip it: anyone whose flakes already stick to wet icing — and anyone whose jar has gone solid, which is a storage problem no technique fixes.

MONÉGASQUE Gold luster dust, 7 g, is on Amazon at $9.99 standard — the fine-particle format for brushing and painting; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Why isn't my edible glitter sticking? Almost always the surface, not the glitter — and you were about four minutes late.

Shimmer powders adhere best to icing that is still wet and glossy. Once a surface has set and dried it takes far less, and the rest ends up on the counter. The pigment is almost insoluble in water, chemically stable and heat-stable: it never dissolves into a surface or becomes part of it, so it only stays where something holds it mechanically. That makes sticking entirely a surface question — and it means there are three methods, not one, with the right method decided by the surface you already have.

In this episode:
- The rule that fixes it: sprinkle wet, brush dry, paint when you want it exactly somewhere
- Dana's winning round: "wet and glossy" and "dry-brush a set surface" are opposite instructions — here's why both are true
- The clear high-proof spirit method, and why alcohol rather than water
- Why chocolate drinks the powder — 70 to 90 grams of oil per 100 grams — and comes out softer
- Fine dust at 5 to 25 microns versus flakes at 50 to 500, and which techniques each one can actually do
- Why working from a dish instead of the jar protects the jar

Who should skip it: anyone whose flakes already stick to wet icing — and anyone whose jar has gone solid, which is a storage problem no technique fixes.

MONÉGASQUE Gold luster dust, 7 g, is on Amazon at $9.99 standard — the fine-particle format for brushing and painting; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/aea17b06/8d43716f.mp3" length="9054530" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>565</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It isn't the jar. Shimmer holds on icing that's still wet — and there are two other methods for after you've missed the window.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It isn't the jar. Shimmer holds on icing that's still wet — and there are two other methods for after you've missed the window.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter not sticking, how to apply luster dust, dry brush luster dust, luster dust paint, edible glitter on fondant, edible glitter on chocolate, cake decorating troubleshooting, buttercream decorating, luster dust technique, edible glitter tips</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/aea17b06/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter vs Disco Dust: Which Ones Can You Eat?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>59</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>59</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter vs Disco Dust: Which Ones Can You Eat?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aad5b2cc-a432-4657-9cac-c5596943def9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/64efe3ed</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter or disco dust? The name on the jar tells you nothing, and this is the episode about what does.

The FDA publishes the list of names these shimmer products are sold under — luster dust, disco dust, twinkle dust, sparkle dust, highlighter, shimmer powder, pearl dust, petal dust — and advises avoiding all of them on food unless the product was specifically manufactured to be edible. Those words describe texture, and they describe it honestly: roughly 5 to 25 microns for the fine metallic sheen, 50 to 500 for the coarse flakes that stay suspended in a glass. What they never describe is whether you can eat it. The only test that works is the label: the word edible, and an ingredient list that companies making edible glitters are required by law to provide.

In this episode:
- The FDA's own label test, and why "non-toxic" is the phrase to walk away from
- What the Rhode Island and Missouri health departments found in 2018 and 2019, and what every one of those products said on the front
- Dana's winning round: an ingredient list is a one-way test — it can't clear a jar, but its absence condemns one
- Why the decoration-only jar is cheaper, and where the money actually goes
- Colour additives are listed food by food with their own ceilings — and why we won't rule on any specific jar from a microphone
- The 40-second aisle checklist, and the 3 documents a professional should ask for instead

Who should skip it: anyone decorating display pieces nobody eats. Craft glitter is the honest buy there.

MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold drink glitter, 10 g, is on Amazon at $14.99 standard — ingredient list on the jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter or disco dust? The name on the jar tells you nothing, and this is the episode about what does.

The FDA publishes the list of names these shimmer products are sold under — luster dust, disco dust, twinkle dust, sparkle dust, highlighter, shimmer powder, pearl dust, petal dust — and advises avoiding all of them on food unless the product was specifically manufactured to be edible. Those words describe texture, and they describe it honestly: roughly 5 to 25 microns for the fine metallic sheen, 50 to 500 for the coarse flakes that stay suspended in a glass. What they never describe is whether you can eat it. The only test that works is the label: the word edible, and an ingredient list that companies making edible glitters are required by law to provide.

In this episode:
- The FDA's own label test, and why "non-toxic" is the phrase to walk away from
- What the Rhode Island and Missouri health departments found in 2018 and 2019, and what every one of those products said on the front
- Dana's winning round: an ingredient list is a one-way test — it can't clear a jar, but its absence condemns one
- Why the decoration-only jar is cheaper, and where the money actually goes
- Colour additives are listed food by food with their own ceilings — and why we won't rule on any specific jar from a microphone
- The 40-second aisle checklist, and the 3 documents a professional should ask for instead

Who should skip it: anyone decorating display pieces nobody eats. Craft glitter is the honest buy there.

MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold drink glitter, 10 g, is on Amazon at $14.99 standard — ingredient list on the jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/64efe3ed/fb0e27aa.mp3" length="16708199" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1043</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Disco dust, petal dust, twinkle dust — the FDA publishes the list because the names promise nothing. The label is the only test.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Disco dust, petal dust, twinkle dust — the FDA publishes the list because the names promise nothing. The label is the only test.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter vs disco dust, disco dust, is disco dust edible, petal dust, twinkle dust, pearl dust, luster dust, edible glitter safety, FDA glitter advisory, cake decorating safety, non-toxic vs edible, food grade glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/64efe3ed/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Edible Glitter Expire? Read the Jar, Not the Internet</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>58</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Does Edible Glitter Expire? Read the Jar, Not the Internet</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc7cff15-1a28-447c-99b9-c4e7b27dc8e7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fe52fded</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter expire? The date printed on the package is the answer, and this episode declines to give you a different number on purpose.

The pigment itself is a mineral: chemically stable, acid- and alkali-resistant, almost insoluble in water and odorless. There is no oil in it to go rancid, no sugar to attract anything and no water for anything to grow in, so it does not spoil the way food spoils. Two things actually end a jar. The first is moisture — clumping in a shimmer powder is almost entirely a moisture-control problem, and a caked jar applies unevenly no matter what its date says. The second is the manufacturer's committed window, which is what the printed date represents, the same way dates work on salt and spices.

In this episode:
- Why no general shelf-life figure is stated here, said out loud rather than dodged
- The four sources of moisture, three of which are you
- Dana's winning round: the date measures a promise, not the powder — so who has to obey it?
- The money: $1.00 a gram at 15 grams, about 150 servings a jar, and what half a jar in the trash costs
- Five storage rules, and why the fridge is the worst thing you could do

Who should skip it: twice-a-year bakers with a jar in a normal cupboard. Check the date, keep it dry, move on.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard — date printed on the package, ingredient list on the jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter expire? The date printed on the package is the answer, and this episode declines to give you a different number on purpose.

The pigment itself is a mineral: chemically stable, acid- and alkali-resistant, almost insoluble in water and odorless. There is no oil in it to go rancid, no sugar to attract anything and no water for anything to grow in, so it does not spoil the way food spoils. Two things actually end a jar. The first is moisture — clumping in a shimmer powder is almost entirely a moisture-control problem, and a caked jar applies unevenly no matter what its date says. The second is the manufacturer's committed window, which is what the printed date represents, the same way dates work on salt and spices.

In this episode:
- Why no general shelf-life figure is stated here, said out loud rather than dodged
- The four sources of moisture, three of which are you
- Dana's winning round: the date measures a promise, not the powder — so who has to obey it?
- The money: $1.00 a gram at 15 grams, about 150 servings a jar, and what half a jar in the trash costs
- Five storage rules, and why the fridge is the worst thing you could do

Who should skip it: twice-a-year bakers with a jar in a normal cupboard. Check the date, keep it dry, move on.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g luster dust is on Amazon at $14.99 standard — date printed on the package, ingredient list on the jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fe52fded/e1457858.mp3" length="8581406" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>535</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The pigment is a stable mineral with nothing in it to spoil. What actually ends a jar is moisture — and a guess.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The pigment is a stable mineral with nothing in it to spoil. What actually ends a jar is moisture — and a guess.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>does edible glitter expire, edible glitter shelf life, how to store edible glitter, luster dust storage, glitter clumping, cake decorating supplies, food storage, drink glitter, baking supplies, expiration date</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fe52fded/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biodegradable Glitter vs Edible Glitter: Not the Same Question</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>57</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Biodegradable Glitter vs Edible Glitter: Not the Same Question</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">faa74828-f3e1-4261-bca8-13281e53728a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a662750f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is biodegradable glitter the same as edible glitter? No, and confusing the two is how the wrong product ends up on food.

"Biodegradable" describes what a material does in the environment. "Edible" describes whether a person may swallow it. They are answered by different rules and proven by different documents. The European microplastics restriction — Commission Regulation 2023/2055, in force since 17 October 2023 — targets synthetic polymer microparticles at 5 millimeters and under, expressly exempts food, and excludes polymers containing no carbon atoms. It was never a food rule. The US food question is answered separately: the FDA advises avoiding glitter and dust products on food unless they were specifically manufactured to be edible, and its test is whether the label carries an ingredient list at all.

In this episode:
- What Regulation 2023/2055 actually says, read carefully rather than paraphrased
- Why "biodegradable" and "non-toxic" both answer questions adjacent to the one buyers are asking
- The three documents to ask any supplier for — and why a safety data sheet is not one of them
- The FDA's alias list, and its blunt label test
- Dana's winning round: the episode explains a regulation and then refuses to apply it — and why that is the right call

Who should skip it: crafters, for whom none of this applies; anyone buying purely on environmental impact, which is a different claim; and any business whose supplier will not produce a specification and a lot certificate.

The MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is biodegradable glitter the same as edible glitter? No, and confusing the two is how the wrong product ends up on food.

"Biodegradable" describes what a material does in the environment. "Edible" describes whether a person may swallow it. They are answered by different rules and proven by different documents. The European microplastics restriction — Commission Regulation 2023/2055, in force since 17 October 2023 — targets synthetic polymer microparticles at 5 millimeters and under, expressly exempts food, and excludes polymers containing no carbon atoms. It was never a food rule. The US food question is answered separately: the FDA advises avoiding glitter and dust products on food unless they were specifically manufactured to be edible, and its test is whether the label carries an ingredient list at all.

In this episode:
- What Regulation 2023/2055 actually says, read carefully rather than paraphrased
- Why "biodegradable" and "non-toxic" both answer questions adjacent to the one buyers are asking
- The three documents to ask any supplier for — and why a safety data sheet is not one of them
- The FDA's alias list, and its blunt label test
- Dana's winning round: the episode explains a regulation and then refuses to apply it — and why that is the right call

Who should skip it: crafters, for whom none of this applies; anyone buying purely on environmental impact, which is a different claim; and any business whose supplier will not produce a specification and a lot certificate.

The MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a662750f/1d284a2b.mp3" length="15058523" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>940</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two labels, two regulations, two different questions — and neither one certifies the other.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two labels, two regulations, two different questions — and neither one certifies the other.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>biodegradable glitter, edible glitter, microplastics, EU 2023/2055, food safety, FDA advisory, luster dust, supplier documentation, certificate of analysis, non-toxic vs edible</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a662750f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flavored Edible Glitter: Why the Good Stuff Tastes Like Nothing</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>56</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Flavored Edible Glitter: Why the Good Stuff Tastes Like Nothing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c672a8e-fe23-43c0-b237-ff3360afdca9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/76b350f7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is there such a thing as flavored edible glitter? Flavored shimmer exists in the wider decorating world, but drink glitter and luster dust are deliberately flavorless — and the reason is arithmetic, not laziness.

The guided dose is 0.1 grams per serving. That is a pinch. There is no flavoring that can be loaded into 0.1 grams of mineral powder and still be tasted in a full drink. You could scale the dose up to carry flavor, but you would buy that with grit in the mouth, a cloudy drink instead of a sparkling one, and a jar that empties many times faster — paying for taste by giving up the effect you bought the product for. The category chose the effect, and that is why bartenders use it at all: an odorless, chemically stable powder leaves a recipe alone.

In this episode:
- Why 0.1 grams cannot carry flavor, and what happens when you dose higher
- Dana's winning round: the mechanism really would work — here is what it costs
- Why "no flavor" runs at 18.4 percent of category negative mentions and also appears, word for word, in the positive ones
- How bars separate the two jobs: flavor from the build, shimmer from the pinch
- Clear drinks, and pinching at pour instead of dosing a pitcher in advance

Who should skip it: anyone who actually wants a flavor — buy a syrup or a liqueur instead — and anyone serving opaque or creamy drinks all night, where the effect drowns.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is there such a thing as flavored edible glitter? Flavored shimmer exists in the wider decorating world, but drink glitter and luster dust are deliberately flavorless — and the reason is arithmetic, not laziness.

The guided dose is 0.1 grams per serving. That is a pinch. There is no flavoring that can be loaded into 0.1 grams of mineral powder and still be tasted in a full drink. You could scale the dose up to carry flavor, but you would buy that with grit in the mouth, a cloudy drink instead of a sparkling one, and a jar that empties many times faster — paying for taste by giving up the effect you bought the product for. The category chose the effect, and that is why bartenders use it at all: an odorless, chemically stable powder leaves a recipe alone.

In this episode:
- Why 0.1 grams cannot carry flavor, and what happens when you dose higher
- Dana's winning round: the mechanism really would work — here is what it costs
- Why "no flavor" runs at 18.4 percent of category negative mentions and also appears, word for word, in the positive ones
- How bars separate the two jobs: flavor from the build, shimmer from the pinch
- Clear drinks, and pinching at pour instead of dosing a pitcher in advance

Who should skip it: anyone who actually wants a flavor — buy a syrup or a liqueur instead — and anyone serving opaque or creamy drinks all night, where the effect drowns.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/76b350f7/082ce22e.mp3" length="5264905" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>328</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The most common complaint in the category is "no flavor" — which is a little like complaining that ice is cold.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The most common complaint in the category is "no flavor" — which is a little like complaining that ice is cold.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>flavored edible glitter, does edible glitter taste like anything, drink glitter, cocktail glitter, edible glitter flavor, bartending, cocktail garnish, edible glitter for drinks, tasteless glitter, clear cocktails</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/76b350f7/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Star Shaped Edible Glitter: What You're Actually Buying</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>55</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Star Shaped Edible Glitter: What You're Actually Buying</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">533f712b-36fa-4763-963d-7050957f5ad4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3fb3efd6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is there star-shaped edible glitter? Not in the way most people mean, and the thing you actually found has a name.

Small flat stars, hearts and snowflakes are sold as quins, confetti or shaped sprinkles, and they are a sugar confection — typical commercial sprinkle ingredient lists start with sugar, then cornstarch, oil, wax, food dyes and flavoring. Edible glitter is a different product class: a loose mineral pigment in pieces running 50 to 500 microns, a size at which a cut star would read as a speck rather than a star. The two fail differently, which is why people blame the wrong one. Sugar shapes soften, can bleed color into wet icing, and will not survive being stirred into a drink. Pigment glitter does not dissolve, adds no flavor, and is built to stay suspended in liquid.

In this episode:
- The one test that settles it: is this going on something wet and stirred?
- Why we say plainly that we do not make a shaped product
- The middle path — sprinkles for the silhouette, glitter for the light, on the same cupcake
- The per-serving math that shows buying both is not buying double
- The label check that applies to either product

Who should skip it: if the shape is the point — a star, a heart, something a 4-year-old will name out loud — buy the sprinkles. Glitter cannot do that.

The MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is there star-shaped edible glitter? Not in the way most people mean, and the thing you actually found has a name.

Small flat stars, hearts and snowflakes are sold as quins, confetti or shaped sprinkles, and they are a sugar confection — typical commercial sprinkle ingredient lists start with sugar, then cornstarch, oil, wax, food dyes and flavoring. Edible glitter is a different product class: a loose mineral pigment in pieces running 50 to 500 microns, a size at which a cut star would read as a speck rather than a star. The two fail differently, which is why people blame the wrong one. Sugar shapes soften, can bleed color into wet icing, and will not survive being stirred into a drink. Pigment glitter does not dissolve, adds no flavor, and is built to stay suspended in liquid.

In this episode:
- The one test that settles it: is this going on something wet and stirred?
- Why we say plainly that we do not make a shaped product
- The middle path — sprinkles for the silhouette, glitter for the light, on the same cupcake
- The per-serving math that shows buying both is not buying double
- The label check that applies to either product

Who should skip it: if the shape is the point — a star, a heart, something a 4-year-old will name out loud — buy the sprinkles. Glitter cannot do that.

The MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3fb3efd6/6c826cb5.mp3" length="5636880" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>351</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>You searched for star-shaped edible glitter. What you found is almost certainly not glitter — and the difference decides your cupcake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>You searched for star-shaped edible glitter. What you found is almost certainly not glitter — and the difference decides your cupcake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>star shaped edible glitter, quins, confetti sprinkles, edible glitter vs sprinkles, cupcake decorating, drink glitter, edible decorations, sprinkles ingredients, iridescent edible glitter, baking supplies</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/3fb3efd6/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Apply Edible Glitter to a Cake Without Wasting It</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>54</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How to Apply Edible Glitter to a Cake Without Wasting It</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1b135897-1456-46f2-8c85-9bb619d581d2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0e79079d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you apply edible glitter to a cake? There are two methods, they are not interchangeable, and picking the wrong one costs you twice.

Dry brushing gives a soft, diffused metallic sheen and it is fast: load a soft brush, tap off the excess, swipe. Painting gives coverage, edges and control: a small amount of dust mixed with a few drops of a clear high-proof spirit to a paint consistency, brushed on. Dry for sheen, wet for anything needing a line, a shape or a solid metallic face. The reason a spirit works as a carrier and water does not is that the pigment is almost insoluble in water — and it is thirsty, with oil absorption on the gold luster dust running 70 to 90 grams per 100 grams of powder.

In this episode:
- The two methods, and how to choose before you open the jar
- Waste control that costs nothing: work from a dish, tap on the rim, decide once
- Fondant takes paint, buttercream takes the dry brush — and why a tier gets finished in one session
- Luster dust at 5 to 25 microns versus flake glitter at 50 to 500 microns
- What to hand a client who asks what is in it

Who should skip it: painting a cake headed into a warm humid box, brushing very soft whipped frostings, and any design with no smooth surface to catch a sheen.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold 7 g luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 with its full ingredient list printed on the jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you apply edible glitter to a cake? There are two methods, they are not interchangeable, and picking the wrong one costs you twice.

Dry brushing gives a soft, diffused metallic sheen and it is fast: load a soft brush, tap off the excess, swipe. Painting gives coverage, edges and control: a small amount of dust mixed with a few drops of a clear high-proof spirit to a paint consistency, brushed on. Dry for sheen, wet for anything needing a line, a shape or a solid metallic face. The reason a spirit works as a carrier and water does not is that the pigment is almost insoluble in water — and it is thirsty, with oil absorption on the gold luster dust running 70 to 90 grams per 100 grams of powder.

In this episode:
- The two methods, and how to choose before you open the jar
- Waste control that costs nothing: work from a dish, tap on the rim, decide once
- Fondant takes paint, buttercream takes the dry brush — and why a tier gets finished in one session
- Luster dust at 5 to 25 microns versus flake glitter at 50 to 500 microns
- What to hand a client who asks what is in it

Who should skip it: painting a cake headed into a warm humid box, brushing very soft whipped frostings, and any design with no smooth surface to catch a sheen.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold 7 g luster dust is on Amazon at $9.99 with its full ingredient list printed on the jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0e79079d/8a1b1b4e.mp3" length="7874217" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>491</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two methods, and they aren't interchangeable. Most of the waste happens between the brush leaving the jar and touching the cake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two methods, and they aren't interchangeable. Most of the waste happens between the brush leaving the jar and touching the cake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how to apply edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, buttercream, fondant, dry brush technique, edible glitter for cakes, cake decorating tips, metallic cake finish, professional cake decorating</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0e79079d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Halloween Cookies: Timing Is Everything</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>53</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>53</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Halloween Cookies: Timing Is Everything</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1744122-aef4-4393-8906-db1432a07413</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1559c5eb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you use edible glitter on Halloween cookies so it actually stays on? Glitter needs something wet to grab, and that is the whole trick.

It sticks to icing while the icing is still wet and glossy. Once royal icing has flashed over and gone matte, the surface is closed and anything you shake at it slides off. So ice 3 or 4 cookies, glitter those, then ice the next 3 or 4 — or let the base coat set completely and pipe one fresh detail on top later, glittering only that. The second method moves the timing to whenever suits you, and a cookie where one spiderweb glitters reads as intentional rather than accidental.

In this episode:
- The wet-icing window, and the small-batch workflow that survives a weeknight with kids
- The landing-pad trick: pipe a fresh detail later and glitter only that
- Why the oven is irrelevant — a heat-stable mineral with a component melting point near 3000 degrees Celsius
- The Halloween palette straight from customers' carts: orange with purple, black and green
- Why black is the shade that earns its jar, by being the background rather than the decoration
- Dana's winning round: what to do when nobody in your kitchen is executing a 90-second window

Who should skip it: bare cookies with no icing, glaze or chocolate, rustic matte styling, and any seasonal jar with a pumpkin on the front and no ingredient list on the back.

The MONÉGASQUE Midnight Black 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you use edible glitter on Halloween cookies so it actually stays on? Glitter needs something wet to grab, and that is the whole trick.

It sticks to icing while the icing is still wet and glossy. Once royal icing has flashed over and gone matte, the surface is closed and anything you shake at it slides off. So ice 3 or 4 cookies, glitter those, then ice the next 3 or 4 — or let the base coat set completely and pipe one fresh detail on top later, glittering only that. The second method moves the timing to whenever suits you, and a cookie where one spiderweb glitters reads as intentional rather than accidental.

In this episode:
- The wet-icing window, and the small-batch workflow that survives a weeknight with kids
- The landing-pad trick: pipe a fresh detail later and glitter only that
- Why the oven is irrelevant — a heat-stable mineral with a component melting point near 3000 degrees Celsius
- The Halloween palette straight from customers' carts: orange with purple, black and green
- Why black is the shade that earns its jar, by being the background rather than the decoration
- Dana's winning round: what to do when nobody in your kitchen is executing a 90-second window

Who should skip it: bare cookies with no icing, glaze or chocolate, rustic matte styling, and any seasonal jar with a pumpkin on the front and no ingredient list on the back.

The MONÉGASQUE Midnight Black 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1559c5eb/4a23b5f6.mp3" length="7641415" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>477</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Most Halloween glitter ends up on the counter, not the cookie. It isn't the jar's fault — it's a window nobody tells you about.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Most Halloween glitter ends up on the counter, not the cookie. It isn't the jar's fault — it's a window nobody tells you about.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter halloween cookies, halloween baking, royal icing, cookie decorating, black edible glitter, halloween cookie ideas, edible glitter tips, orange edible glitter, baking with kids, food glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1559c5eb/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rose Gold Edible Glitter: When It Beats Gold and Silver</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>52</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>52</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Rose Gold Edible Glitter: When It Beats Gold and Silver</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb0fde01-f8dd-447e-b064-9e9f73602bb2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1ca852d3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is rose gold edible glitter actually for? It is the third metallic, and it exists because the first two have a blind spot.

Gold reads warm — on a blush and ivory table it turns brassy and starts fighting the flowers. Silver reads cool, and on that same pale table it disappears. Rose gold sits between them, which makes it the shade for blush, ivory, dusty pink and cream palettes. If your palette is jewel-toned or black-tie, you do not need it. The distinction that matters is not rose gold versus pink: pink is a color and stays pink, while rose gold is a metallic, so it catches light and changes as a glass turns. Buy the color, or buy the shine.

In this episode:
- The palette test that decides between gold, silver and rose gold in about 10 seconds
- Event math: 0.1 grams a serving, about 100 servings a 10 gram jar, 1 jar per 100 glasses
- Dana's winning round: when the pink you already own is the smarter $15
- Flake versus dust — 50 to 500 microns for drinks, 5 to 25 microns for a cake surface
- The toast question, answered precisely: what the federal color-additive listing for drinks actually names

Who should skip it: anyone working a cool or jewel-toned palette, anyone who only decorates pale cakes and never touches drinks, and first-time buyers with no palette in mind — a first jar should be a general one.

The MONÉGASQUE Rose Gold 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is rose gold edible glitter actually for? It is the third metallic, and it exists because the first two have a blind spot.

Gold reads warm — on a blush and ivory table it turns brassy and starts fighting the flowers. Silver reads cool, and on that same pale table it disappears. Rose gold sits between them, which makes it the shade for blush, ivory, dusty pink and cream palettes. If your palette is jewel-toned or black-tie, you do not need it. The distinction that matters is not rose gold versus pink: pink is a color and stays pink, while rose gold is a metallic, so it catches light and changes as a glass turns. Buy the color, or buy the shine.

In this episode:
- The palette test that decides between gold, silver and rose gold in about 10 seconds
- Event math: 0.1 grams a serving, about 100 servings a 10 gram jar, 1 jar per 100 glasses
- Dana's winning round: when the pink you already own is the smarter $15
- Flake versus dust — 50 to 500 microns for drinks, 5 to 25 microns for a cake surface
- The toast question, answered precisely: what the federal color-additive listing for drinks actually names

Who should skip it: anyone working a cool or jewel-toned palette, anyone who only decorates pale cakes and never touches drinks, and first-time buyers with no palette in mind — a first jar should be a general one.

The MONÉGASQUE Rose Gold 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1ca852d3/deb54599.mp3" length="7206317" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>449</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Gold goes brassy on a blush table and silver disappears. The third metallic exists for the palette the first two ruin.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gold goes brassy on a blush table and silver disappears. The third metallic exists for the palette the first two ruin.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>rose gold edible glitter, edible glitter colors, drink glitter, wedding cocktails, edible glitter for drinks, metallic edible glitter, luster dust, event planning, signature cocktail, servings per jar</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/1ca852d3/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter for Desserts: What Works Beyond the Cake</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>51</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>51</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter for Desserts: What Works Beyond the Cake</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2592ced4-ba4e-4013-ad6e-f00bd33c6361</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fc10a7c0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which desserts does edible glitter work on? More than cake — and with Halloween eight weekends out, this is the pre-season scouting report.

The manufacturer's technical data sheet lists the range plainly: cake, candy, chocolate, and drinks. The working rule is one sentence — dust for sheen, flakes for sparkle. Luster dust (a 5 to 25 micron powder) gives smooth surfaces a metallic finish: frosting, fondant, chocolate. Flake glitter (50 to 500 microns) brings visible sparkle to icing, dipped strawberries, cookies, and candy. The mineral pigment is heat-stable and insoluble, so it survives the oven and won't bleed into glazes.

In this episode:
- The station-by-station table map: cake (still 52.1 percent of usage mentions in about 2,400 category reviews), dipped strawberries, cookies and cupcakes, candy
- The night-sky trick: black glitter on frosting makes every pale thing on top of it glow
- Dana's winning round: pick 1 or 2 hero surfaces — a table where everything sparkles is a table where nothing does
- The fall palette straight from customers' carts: orange with purple, black, and green
- Why the oven doesn't matter: heat-stable, insoluble, unbothered

Who should skip it: warm saucy desserts with no surface for sparkle, rustic-styled tables, and any shimmer jar with no ingredient list — pop-up seasonal products included.

The MONÉGASQUE Midnight Black 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which desserts does edible glitter work on? More than cake — and with Halloween eight weekends out, this is the pre-season scouting report.

The manufacturer's technical data sheet lists the range plainly: cake, candy, chocolate, and drinks. The working rule is one sentence — dust for sheen, flakes for sparkle. Luster dust (a 5 to 25 micron powder) gives smooth surfaces a metallic finish: frosting, fondant, chocolate. Flake glitter (50 to 500 microns) brings visible sparkle to icing, dipped strawberries, cookies, and candy. The mineral pigment is heat-stable and insoluble, so it survives the oven and won't bleed into glazes.

In this episode:
- The station-by-station table map: cake (still 52.1 percent of usage mentions in about 2,400 category reviews), dipped strawberries, cookies and cupcakes, candy
- The night-sky trick: black glitter on frosting makes every pale thing on top of it glow
- Dana's winning round: pick 1 or 2 hero surfaces — a table where everything sparkles is a table where nothing does
- The fall palette straight from customers' carts: orange with purple, black, and green
- Why the oven doesn't matter: heat-stable, insoluble, unbothered

Who should skip it: warm saucy desserts with no surface for sparkle, rustic-styled tables, and any shimmer jar with no ingredient list — pop-up seasonal products included.

The MONÉGASQUE Midnight Black 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fc10a7c0/3f037256.mp3" length="6611561" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>412</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dust for sheen, flakes for sparkle — the whole dessert-table map, from dipped strawberries to the Halloween skeleton cake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dust for sheen, flakes for sparkle — the whole dessert-table map, from dipped strawberries to the Halloween skeleton cake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for desserts, halloween baking, edible glitter for cakes, chocolate covered strawberries, halloween treats, luster dust, dessert table, cookies and cupcakes, black edible glitter, holiday baking</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fc10a7c0/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Edible Glitter Show Up in Poop? An Honest Answer</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>50</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>50</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Does Edible Glitter Show Up in Poop? An Honest Answer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16c48cfc-23da-4e6d-8ec8-cb44f4dfd4f8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/34b4d3aa</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter show up in poop? The internet's favorite glitter question gets a straight answer — with actual chemistry and a mostly straight face.

At the doses anyone actually uses — a pinch is 0.1 grams — you almost certainly won't notice anything. Per the safety data sheet, the mica-based pigment doesn't dissolve in water and resists both acid and alkali, so digestion has nothing to grab onto: what goes in passes through, unchanged, mixed into everything else you ate. And here's the honest part most answers skip: nobody has published a sparkle-visibility study. Anyone who tells you definitively what happens is making it up.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The chemistry of "passes through": insoluble, acid-resistant, stable
- Dana's winning round: there is no data, and honest shows say so
- The question under the question: WHAT did you swallow? Edible glitter is FDA-listed pigment with ingredients on the label; craft glitter was never food
- The real-world reason this matters: the 2018–2019 Rhode Island and Missouri investigations into cakes decorated with non-edible luster dusts containing copper, lead, and other metals
- When it's a professional's call: a kid plus a large amount of any glitter means poison control, not a podcast

Who should skip it: anyone hoping for a visible souvenir, and anyone who won't read a label first.

The MONÉGASQUE Magic Rainbow 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does edible glitter show up in poop? The internet's favorite glitter question gets a straight answer — with actual chemistry and a mostly straight face.

At the doses anyone actually uses — a pinch is 0.1 grams — you almost certainly won't notice anything. Per the safety data sheet, the mica-based pigment doesn't dissolve in water and resists both acid and alkali, so digestion has nothing to grab onto: what goes in passes through, unchanged, mixed into everything else you ate. And here's the honest part most answers skip: nobody has published a sparkle-visibility study. Anyone who tells you definitively what happens is making it up.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The chemistry of "passes through": insoluble, acid-resistant, stable
- Dana's winning round: there is no data, and honest shows say so
- The question under the question: WHAT did you swallow? Edible glitter is FDA-listed pigment with ingredients on the label; craft glitter was never food
- The real-world reason this matters: the 2018–2019 Rhode Island and Missouri investigations into cakes decorated with non-edible luster dusts containing copper, lead, and other metals
- When it's a professional's call: a kid plus a large amount of any glitter means poison control, not a podcast

Who should skip it: anyone hoping for a visible souvenir, and anyone who won't read a label first.

The MONÉGASQUE Magic Rainbow 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/34b4d3aa/ee434705.mp3" length="5167092" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>322</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At a 0.1 gram pinch you almost certainly won't notice — the mineral passes through. The real question is what you swallowed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At a 0.1 gram pinch you almost certainly won't notice — the mineral passes through. The real question is what you swallowed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>does edible glitter show up in poop, edible glitter safety, is edible glitter safe, edible glitter digestion, craft glitter vs edible glitter, food grade glitter, kids baking, edible glitter questions, glitter drinks, funny food questions</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/34b4d3aa/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Iridescent Edible Glitter: What It Is and When to Use It</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>49</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Iridescent Edible Glitter: What It Is and When to Use It</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd0f248a-41c2-412a-b1c0-e96489e318cc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/dfd7f63e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is iridescent edible glitter? Shimmer with no fixed color — and the most versatile jar in the line.

The rainbow isn't a dye; it's structural, like a soap bubble's colors. The pigment is built exactly the way the federal color-additive regulation (21 CFR 73.350) describes: titanium dioxide layered on mica, and those layers play with light, shifting through soft rainbow tones as the glass turns. Because it commits to no color, it goes with every color — the reason it's the classic first jar.

In this episode:
- The first-timer's week: the video, the party, the jar that removes every decision
- What about 2,400 category reviews reveal: the most-mentioned person is "daughter," the top place is the kitchen, the top occasion a holiday — and ease of use is the top praise (73.8 percent of positive mentions)
- The Sparkle Lab: a single-ingredient shade per the spec sheet — no dyes, the rainbow is physics
- Dana's winning round: on bright white frosting, iridescent whispers — contrast still rules
- The math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar, roughly 15 cents a glass

Who should skip it: white-cake centerpieces (go gold or a real color), dark or creamy drinks, and anyone who wants bold committed color — iridescent is a shimmer, not a statement.

The MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is iridescent edible glitter? Shimmer with no fixed color — and the most versatile jar in the line.

The rainbow isn't a dye; it's structural, like a soap bubble's colors. The pigment is built exactly the way the federal color-additive regulation (21 CFR 73.350) describes: titanium dioxide layered on mica, and those layers play with light, shifting through soft rainbow tones as the glass turns. Because it commits to no color, it goes with every color — the reason it's the classic first jar.

In this episode:
- The first-timer's week: the video, the party, the jar that removes every decision
- What about 2,400 category reviews reveal: the most-mentioned person is "daughter," the top place is the kitchen, the top occasion a holiday — and ease of use is the top praise (73.8 percent of positive mentions)
- The Sparkle Lab: a single-ingredient shade per the spec sheet — no dyes, the rainbow is physics
- Dana's winning round: on bright white frosting, iridescent whispers — contrast still rules
- The math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar, roughly 15 cents a glass

Who should skip it: white-cake centerpieces (go gold or a real color), dark or creamy drinks, and anyone who wants bold committed color — iridescent is a shimmer, not a statement.

The MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/dfd7f63e/cb311b58.mp3" length="7050419" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>440</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shimmer with no fixed color — titanium dioxide layered on mica shifts through rainbow tones, which is why it's the classic first jar.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shimmer with no fixed color — titanium dioxide layered on mica shifts through rainbow tones, which is why it's the classic first jar.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>iridescent edible glitter, edible glitter, drink glitter, iridescent butterfly, first jar, galaxy drinks, edible glitter for drinks, mica based pearlescent pigments, holiday baking, shimmer drinks</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/dfd7f63e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter vs Sprinkles: Which Does a Dessert Need?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>48</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>48</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter vs Sprinkles: Which Does a Dessert Need?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69c36536-a5ae-482b-889f-22273b04da95</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e52e7e07</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter vs sprinkles — what's the difference? They do different jobs, and they're not substitutes.

Sprinkles are sugar craft: crunch, sweetness, candy color you can taste. Edible glitter is light: a flavorless mineral shimmer whose 50 to 500 micron flakes catch light, stay suspended in drinks, and change nothing about how the dessert tastes. Sugar dissolves in liquid; the mineral pigment doesn't — and it's heat-stable enough to go through the oven unchanged.

In this episode (a proper table debate — Dana argues team sprinkles):
- The chemistry line between the two: what dissolves, what suspends, what survives baking
- Dana's winning round: in about 2,400 category reviews, the top complaint about glitter is that it has no flavor (18.4 percent of negative mentions) — so kids' birthday cupcakes stay sprinkled
- Why the flavorlessness is by design: the lemon cake still tastes exactly like lemon cake
- The Sparkle Lab on labels: edible glitter must list its ingredients by law — the "decorative purposes only" impostor is the glitter aisle's real problem
- The per-use math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar — a season purchase, not a cupcake-tray purchase

Who should skip it: classroom cupcake missions stay with the shaker; drinks, metallics, and anything oven-bound belong to glitter; and any shimmer with no ingredient list gets skipped by everyone.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g edible glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter vs sprinkles — what's the difference? They do different jobs, and they're not substitutes.

Sprinkles are sugar craft: crunch, sweetness, candy color you can taste. Edible glitter is light: a flavorless mineral shimmer whose 50 to 500 micron flakes catch light, stay suspended in drinks, and change nothing about how the dessert tastes. Sugar dissolves in liquid; the mineral pigment doesn't — and it's heat-stable enough to go through the oven unchanged.

In this episode (a proper table debate — Dana argues team sprinkles):
- The chemistry line between the two: what dissolves, what suspends, what survives baking
- Dana's winning round: in about 2,400 category reviews, the top complaint about glitter is that it has no flavor (18.4 percent of negative mentions) — so kids' birthday cupcakes stay sprinkled
- Why the flavorlessness is by design: the lemon cake still tastes exactly like lemon cake
- The Sparkle Lab on labels: edible glitter must list its ingredients by law — the "decorative purposes only" impostor is the glitter aisle's real problem
- The per-use math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar — a season purchase, not a cupcake-tray purchase

Who should skip it: classroom cupcake missions stay with the shaker; drinks, metallics, and anything oven-bound belong to glitter; and any shimmer with no ingredient list gets skipped by everyone.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g edible glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e52e7e07/dc645f00.mp3" length="6903297" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>431</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sprinkles are candy — texture and taste. Glitter is light — flavorless mineral shimmer. They're aisle-mates, not substitutes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sprinkles are candy — texture and taste. Glitter is light — flavorless mineral shimmer. They're aisle-mates, not substitutes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter vs sprinkles, edible glitter sprinkles, sprinkles, cake decorating, birthday cupcakes, edible glitter for drinks, luster dust, food grade glitter, baking with kids, dessert decoration</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e52e7e07/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>White Edible Glitter: What It's For and How Far a Jar Goes</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>47</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>White Edible Glitter: What It's For and How Far a Jar Goes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6a86ed2-813a-400a-bd9d-5dfc2c78aae9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/12ddc9ea</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is white edible glitter good for? It's the universal contrast shade — and the easiest budget line at any party.

White shimmer shows up on anything with color: clear signature cocktails, chocolate-dipped strawberries, dark tortes, colored frosting. And it vanishes on anything white — which means the classic mistake is dusting it onto the one surface people buy it for: the big white cake. That surface wants gold or silver instead; contrast does the work.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The white-on-white trap, and where white actually earns its keep
- What's inside: per the spec sheet, the white shades are single-ingredient — mica-based pearlescent pigments, nothing else, full list printed on the jar
- The event math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings per 10 g jar, roughly 15 cents a glass — one jar per 100 glasses, and the 15 g luster jar runs about 150 servings for bigger lists
- Two pro habits: pinch at pour time, and run one test glass the week before

Who should skip it: all-white parties with creamy or opaque drinks — that palette wants metallics, and shimmer drowns in opaque pours.

The MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is white edible glitter good for? It's the universal contrast shade — and the easiest budget line at any party.

White shimmer shows up on anything with color: clear signature cocktails, chocolate-dipped strawberries, dark tortes, colored frosting. And it vanishes on anything white — which means the classic mistake is dusting it onto the one surface people buy it for: the big white cake. That surface wants gold or silver instead; contrast does the work.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The white-on-white trap, and where white actually earns its keep
- What's inside: per the spec sheet, the white shades are single-ingredient — mica-based pearlescent pigments, nothing else, full list printed on the jar
- The event math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings per 10 g jar, roughly 15 cents a glass — one jar per 100 glasses, and the 15 g luster jar runs about 150 servings for bigger lists
- Two pro habits: pinch at pour time, and run one test glass the week before

Who should skip it: all-white parties with creamy or opaque drinks — that palette wants metallics, and shimmer drowns in opaque pours.

The MONÉGASQUE Snow White 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/12ddc9ea/cd923a3b.mp3" length="4449879" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>277</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>White is the universal contrast shade — it shows on everything but white. One 10 g jar covers a 100-glass party at about 15 cents a glass.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>White is the universal contrast shade — it shows on everything but white. One 10 g jar covers a 100-glass party at about 15 cents a glass.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>white edible glitter, edible glitter white, snow white glitter, edible glitter for drinks, signature cocktails, wedding desserts, anniversary party, drink glitter, luster dust, party planning</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/12ddc9ea/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Cake Spray vs Powder: Which to Buy</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>46</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Cake Spray vs Powder: Which to Buy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a74907e-d0bc-412a-b679-df0cf1da96b2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3858104d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter cake spray worth buying? For most bakers, the jar still wins — and this episode runs a working decorator's stacked weekend both ways to show why.

The spray has one genuine talent: fast, even coverage on big flat surfaces. But it can't do an edge, it oversprays everything in a radius, and it sits in the drawer once the flat top is done. The jar of luster dust applies wet or dry, layers to the intensity an order needs, dusts cupcakes one at a time, goes on before or after baking — the pigment is a heat-stable 5 to 25 micron mineral powder — and carries the printed ingredient list and safety paperwork a client can actually ask about.

In this episode:
- A cottage-bakery weekend — birthday tier plus 4 dozen cupcakes — run with the can, then with the jar
- Dana's winning round: in about 2,400 category reviews, ease of use was the top praise (73.8 percent of positive mentions) — and it went to ordinary jars
- The label test that applies to both formats: ingredients listed by law, or it doesn't touch food
- The value math a can can't show: about $1.43 per gram, a fraction of a gram per cake

Who should skip it: detail workers and drink people skip the spray; sheet-cake bakers on a deadline may honestly keep it; everyone skips a label with no ingredient list.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color luster dust set is on Amazon — built-in sifter caps, full ingredient lists on every jar. Check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter cake spray worth buying? For most bakers, the jar still wins — and this episode runs a working decorator's stacked weekend both ways to show why.

The spray has one genuine talent: fast, even coverage on big flat surfaces. But it can't do an edge, it oversprays everything in a radius, and it sits in the drawer once the flat top is done. The jar of luster dust applies wet or dry, layers to the intensity an order needs, dusts cupcakes one at a time, goes on before or after baking — the pigment is a heat-stable 5 to 25 micron mineral powder — and carries the printed ingredient list and safety paperwork a client can actually ask about.

In this episode:
- A cottage-bakery weekend — birthday tier plus 4 dozen cupcakes — run with the can, then with the jar
- Dana's winning round: in about 2,400 category reviews, ease of use was the top praise (73.8 percent of positive mentions) — and it went to ordinary jars
- The label test that applies to both formats: ingredients listed by law, or it doesn't touch food
- The value math a can can't show: about $1.43 per gram, a fraction of a gram per cake

Who should skip it: detail workers and drink people skip the spray; sheet-cake bakers on a deadline may honestly keep it; everyone skips a label with no ingredient list.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color luster dust set is on Amazon — built-in sifter caps, full ingredient lists on every jar. Check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3858104d/5bc296ea.mp3" length="6999421" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>437</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The can promises speed, the jar does five jobs — a working decorator's weekend, run both ways, settles the spray question.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The can promises speed, the jar does five jobs — a working decorator's weekend, run both ways, settles the spray question.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter cake spray, edible glitter spray for cakes, luster dust, cake decorating, cottage bakery, glitter spray vs powder, food grade glitter, edible glitter for cakes, sifter jar, ingredient label</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/3858104d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blue Edible Glitter: Which Shade Works in the Glass</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>45</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Blue Edible Glitter: Which Shade Works in the Glass</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b4931a6-98af-499b-b83b-a577c2627e44</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6bd421d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which blue edible glitter should you buy? The answer is mechanical: match the blue to the job, and let contrast pick the shade.

Drinks get flake-style drink glitter — Ocean Blue for a deep swirl, Skyline Blue for a lighter look — in a clear pour, where 50 to 500 micron flakes catch light and stay suspended. Bakes get blue luster dust — Blue or Teal Blue — a 5 to 25 micron powder brushed on for a smooth sheen. And if the drink or dessert is already blue, skip blue entirely: blue-on-blue cancels itself, and a white or silver shimmer reads better.

In this episode:
- Why the same jar looks like magic in a glass and like a mistake on frosting
- The Sparkle Lab on what makes blue glitter blue — mica-based pigments plus FD&amp;C Blue 1, printed on the label
- Dana's winning round: per gram, the 15 g luster jar beats the 10 g drink jar — and why per-serving is the unit that matters in a glass
- The math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar, roughly 15 cents a glass

Who should skip it: dark or creamy drink menus, chocolate-dark desserts, and anyone whose drink is already blue — that's the blue-on-blue trap.

The MONÉGASQUE Ocean Blue 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which blue edible glitter should you buy? The answer is mechanical: match the blue to the job, and let contrast pick the shade.

Drinks get flake-style drink glitter — Ocean Blue for a deep swirl, Skyline Blue for a lighter look — in a clear pour, where 50 to 500 micron flakes catch light and stay suspended. Bakes get blue luster dust — Blue or Teal Blue — a 5 to 25 micron powder brushed on for a smooth sheen. And if the drink or dessert is already blue, skip blue entirely: blue-on-blue cancels itself, and a white or silver shimmer reads better.

In this episode:
- Why the same jar looks like magic in a glass and like a mistake on frosting
- The Sparkle Lab on what makes blue glitter blue — mica-based pigments plus FD&amp;C Blue 1, printed on the label
- Dana's winning round: per gram, the 15 g luster jar beats the 10 g drink jar — and why per-serving is the unit that matters in a glass
- The math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar, roughly 15 cents a glass

Who should skip it: dark or creamy drink menus, chocolate-dark desserts, and anyone whose drink is already blue — that's the blue-on-blue trap.

The MONÉGASQUE Ocean Blue 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c6bd421d/f5583048.mp3" length="7845373" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>489</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A blue drink looks like magic and blue frosting often doesn't — the flake size and the contrast rule decide which blue jar to buy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A blue drink looks like magic and blue frosting often doesn't — the flake size and the contrast rule decide which blue jar to buy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>blue edible glitter, edible glitter for drinks, drink glitter, ocean blue glitter, galaxy drinks, blue cocktails, luster dust, cake decorating, signature cocktails, edible glitter baking</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6bd421d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Amazon: How to Pick a Jar You Can Trust</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>44</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Amazon: How to Pick a Jar You Can Trust</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ddfc4fd4-d274-4e67-ab11-918cbe976fa8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a75edf1c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you pick edible glitter on Amazon when every listing looks the same? Three checks, in order — and the sticker price is the least useful number on the page.

Check one is the label test, online edition: find the ingredient list in the photos or description before anything else. Edible glitter is required by law to carry one, so a listing that shows it is showing its homework — and "non-toxic" with no ingredient list means scroll on. Check two is serving math, not sticker math: the drink serving is 0.1 grams, so a 10 g jar is about 100 servings — roughly 15 cents a serving — and that number makes different jar sizes comparable when the sticker hides the spread. Check three is the crowd: the category's top products cluster around 4.5 stars and up with well over 1,000 reviews.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The three checks, in the order that protects a paid order
- Dana's winning round: sort-by-price survives — as step two, never step one
- The pro follow-up: asking for the safety data sheet before a client or inspector asks you
- Why cheap isn't a red flag, but unlabeled cheap isn't a deal at any price

Who should skip the homework: display-only buyers (craft glitter money), and the one-jar birthday buyer — run check one and enjoy the party.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color luster dust set is on Amazon — the line's lowest price per gram, ingredient lists printed, sifter caps; check the listing for today's price.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you pick edible glitter on Amazon when every listing looks the same? Three checks, in order — and the sticker price is the least useful number on the page.

Check one is the label test, online edition: find the ingredient list in the photos or description before anything else. Edible glitter is required by law to carry one, so a listing that shows it is showing its homework — and "non-toxic" with no ingredient list means scroll on. Check two is serving math, not sticker math: the drink serving is 0.1 grams, so a 10 g jar is about 100 servings — roughly 15 cents a serving — and that number makes different jar sizes comparable when the sticker hides the spread. Check three is the crowd: the category's top products cluster around 4.5 stars and up with well over 1,000 reviews.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The three checks, in the order that protects a paid order
- Dana's winning round: sort-by-price survives — as step two, never step one
- The pro follow-up: asking for the safety data sheet before a client or inspector asks you
- Why cheap isn't a red flag, but unlabeled cheap isn't a deal at any price

Who should skip the homework: display-only buyers (craft glitter money), and the one-jar birthday buyer — run check one and enjoy the party.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color luster dust set is on Amazon — the line's lowest price per gram, ingredient lists printed, sifter caps; check the listing for today's price.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a75edf1c/1fbbbe0f.mp3" length="4551860" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Four identical-looking jars, one paid order on the line. Three checks sort them — and the sticker price is the least useful number.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Four identical-looking jars, one paid order on the line. Three checks sort them — and the sticker price is the least useful number.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter amazon, how to buy edible glitter, edible glitter listing, food safe glitter, edible glitter price, luster dust, cake business supplies, cottage bakery, edible glitter reviews, price per serving</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a75edf1c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pink Edible Glitter: Which Shade for Drinks and Cakes</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>43</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Pink Edible Glitter: Which Shade for Drinks and Cakes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5784d164-1787-4063-a5f7-99d7cedae3b7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/be7ebf99</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which pink edible glitter should you buy? Pink is the most-searched color in the category — and it's really three jobs, not one shade.

Drinks get the soft pinks: Baby Pink or Sakura Pink flake glitter swirling in a clear pour like a pink margarita, where the shimmer stays visible in the glass. Statement bakes get Hot Pink — the loud one — on a pale canvas like white buttercream or a white chocolate strawberry. Formal occasions get Rose Gold, the warm metallic for weddings and anniversaries. The rule underneath all of it: contrast does the work. Pink glitter on pink frosting is decorating for no one.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The three pink jobs, mapped to the four pink shades in the 10 g drink-glitter line
- Why "get the hot pink for everything" backfires — the pinkest jar needs the palest stage
- Dana's winning round: one party, one signature drink, one jar — the mood board keeps the other pinks as a screenshot
- The math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar, roughly 15 cents a glass

Who should skip it: opaque pink drinks — strawberry milk, creamy blends — swallow shimmer whole; and if the dessert is already saturated pink, go contrast with a white shimmer instead of matching.

The MONÉGASQUE Baby Pink 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which pink edible glitter should you buy? Pink is the most-searched color in the category — and it's really three jobs, not one shade.

Drinks get the soft pinks: Baby Pink or Sakura Pink flake glitter swirling in a clear pour like a pink margarita, where the shimmer stays visible in the glass. Statement bakes get Hot Pink — the loud one — on a pale canvas like white buttercream or a white chocolate strawberry. Formal occasions get Rose Gold, the warm metallic for weddings and anniversaries. The rule underneath all of it: contrast does the work. Pink glitter on pink frosting is decorating for no one.

In this episode (an Ask the Table short):
- The three pink jobs, mapped to the four pink shades in the 10 g drink-glitter line
- Why "get the hot pink for everything" backfires — the pinkest jar needs the palest stage
- Dana's winning round: one party, one signature drink, one jar — the mood board keeps the other pinks as a screenshot
- The math: 0.1 grams a pinch, about 100 servings a jar, roughly 15 cents a glass

Who should skip it: opaque pink drinks — strawberry milk, creamy blends — swallow shimmer whole; and if the dessert is already saturated pink, go contrast with a white shimmer instead of matching.

The MONÉGASQUE Baby Pink 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/be7ebf99/dfeb4845.mp3" length="4323233" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>269</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The most-searched glitter color is really three jobs — soft pinks for clear pours, hot pink for pale bakes, rose gold for formal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The most-searched glitter color is really three jobs — soft pinks for clear pours, hot pink for pale bakes, rose gold for formal.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>pink edible glitter, edible glitter for drinks, bachelorette party drinks, pink cocktails, rose gold glitter, baby pink glitter, hot pink glitter, drink glitter, cake decorating, signature cocktails</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/be7ebf99/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Make Edible Glitter at Home — And When to Buy Instead</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>42</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How to Make Edible Glitter at Home — And When to Buy Instead</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">994befde-e690-4c44-8776-85a41b41f4c8</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/83c2e106</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you make edible glitter at home? It's a sugar craft: sugar or a food-safe gum like gum arabic, dissolved, tinted with food coloring, dried into a thin sheet, and broken into glittery flakes. Every ingredient is food — those are the same common ingredients the FDA lists for edible glitters — so the result is genuinely edible.

The honest part the videos skip: homemade glitter is candy, and it behaves like candy. It shines on dry surfaces — cookies, frosting, cupcake tops — but it dissolves into sweet nothing in a drink, melts in the oven, and never turns metallic, because the pearl-metal look comes from a layered mineral pigment (titanium dioxide deposited on mica) that a saucepan can't reproduce.

In this episode:
- The homemade method at a glance, and the one safety rail: everything in the pot must be food — the craft drawer stays closed
- Sparkle Lab: candy facets versus layered mineral wafers — why the two sparkles look different
- Dana's winning round: for a kid's cookie Saturday, homemade beats the jar outright
- The three jobs sugar can't take: liquid, heat, and metallic sheen
- The per-serving math on the store jar: about 15 cents a drink

Who should skip which: skip homemade for drinks, ovens, metallics, or three dozen consistent bake-sale cookies; skip the store jar if the making is the point and the target is cookie tops.

The MONÉGASQUE Magic Rainbow 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon — ingredient list one item long: mica-based pearlescent pigments. About $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you make edible glitter at home? It's a sugar craft: sugar or a food-safe gum like gum arabic, dissolved, tinted with food coloring, dried into a thin sheet, and broken into glittery flakes. Every ingredient is food — those are the same common ingredients the FDA lists for edible glitters — so the result is genuinely edible.

The honest part the videos skip: homemade glitter is candy, and it behaves like candy. It shines on dry surfaces — cookies, frosting, cupcake tops — but it dissolves into sweet nothing in a drink, melts in the oven, and never turns metallic, because the pearl-metal look comes from a layered mineral pigment (titanium dioxide deposited on mica) that a saucepan can't reproduce.

In this episode:
- The homemade method at a glance, and the one safety rail: everything in the pot must be food — the craft drawer stays closed
- Sparkle Lab: candy facets versus layered mineral wafers — why the two sparkles look different
- Dana's winning round: for a kid's cookie Saturday, homemade beats the jar outright
- The three jobs sugar can't take: liquid, heat, and metallic sheen
- The per-serving math on the store jar: about 15 cents a drink

Who should skip which: skip homemade for drinks, ovens, metallics, or three dozen consistent bake-sale cookies; skip the store jar if the making is the point and the target is cookie tops.

The MONÉGASQUE Magic Rainbow 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon — ingredient list one item long: mica-based pearlescent pigments. About $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/83c2e106/ed5fc9d8.mp3" length="7925692" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>494</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yes, you can make real edible glitter from pantry sugar. It just obeys candy physics — and candy can't do three of the jobs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yes, you can make real edible glitter from pantry sugar. It just obeys candy physics — and candy can't do three of the jobs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how to make edible glitter, homemade edible glitter, DIY edible glitter, edible glitter recipe, sugar glitter, edible glitter for drinks, luster dust, cake decorating, kids baking projects, mica-based pearlescent pigments</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/83c2e106/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter at Craft Stores: What to Check Before You Buy</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>41</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter at Craft Stores: What to Check Before You Buy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3ffe3b4-1a54-41c3-923a-bf1a013f2862</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fa524383</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you buy edible glitter at a craft store? Sometimes — but the aisle can't tell you which jar is food. Only the label can, and the test takes 10 seconds.

Companies that make edible glitter are required by law to print an ingredient list on the label. So flip the jar: ingredients listed, it's in the running. No ingredient list — or a label leaning on "non-toxic" or "for decorative purposes only" — and it is not food, no matter which aisle it's shelved in. That's the FDA's own advice to bakers, nearly word for word.

In this episode:
- Why "non-toxic" is a craft word, not a food word — and why the reassuring label is the warning
- The eight aliases sparkle travels under (disco dust, pearl dust, shimmer powder…) and why names prove nothing
- What a real edible label shows: the FDA's list of common edible glitter ingredients
- The documented 2018–2019 luster dust poisoning investigations that explain why the rules exist
- The price math that makes the $15 jar cost about 15 cents a drink

Who should skip it: wreath-and-display projects should buy craft glitter proudly — it's the right product for crafts. And if every jar in the aisle fails the label test, skip the purchase and order a labeled jar instead.

The MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you buy edible glitter at a craft store? Sometimes — but the aisle can't tell you which jar is food. Only the label can, and the test takes 10 seconds.

Companies that make edible glitter are required by law to print an ingredient list on the label. So flip the jar: ingredients listed, it's in the running. No ingredient list — or a label leaning on "non-toxic" or "for decorative purposes only" — and it is not food, no matter which aisle it's shelved in. That's the FDA's own advice to bakers, nearly word for word.

In this episode:
- Why "non-toxic" is a craft word, not a food word — and why the reassuring label is the warning
- The eight aliases sparkle travels under (disco dust, pearl dust, shimmer powder…) and why names prove nothing
- What a real edible label shows: the FDA's list of common edible glitter ingredients
- The documented 2018–2019 luster dust poisoning investigations that explain why the rules exist
- The price math that makes the $15 jar cost about 15 cents a drink

Who should skip it: wreath-and-display projects should buy craft glitter proudly — it's the right product for crafts. And if every jar in the aisle fails the label test, skip the purchase and order a labeled jar instead.

The MONÉGASQUE Iridescent Butterfly 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon with its full ingredient list printed on the jar — about $15; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fa524383/accebc5a.mp3" length="8626547" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>538</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The aisle can't tell you what's edible — the label can, in 10 seconds. And the reassuring word on the jar is the one to watch.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The aisle can't tell you what's edible — the label can, in 10 seconds. And the reassuring word on the jar is the one to watch.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter craft store, edible glitter near me, non-toxic vs edible glitter, luster dust, disco dust, edible glitter label, food safe glitter, cake decorating, edible glitter ingredients, where to buy edible glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/fa524383/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Are Glitter Drinks So Popular? Inside the Sparkle Wave</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>40</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Are Glitter Drinks So Popular? Inside the Sparkle Wave</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7593eb57-adb5-4cfa-b884-ddb3c96a20f5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/44938e2e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why are glitter drinks suddenly everywhere? Because the demand is real and measurable — and nobody is behind it.

Amazon search data shows over 2.4 million searches for this category in a single year, with drink-specific searches growing several times faster than general glitter terms — "edible glitter for drinks" grew more than eightfold year over year. The tell: more than 9 in 10 of those searches carry no brand name, and the category's one real Instagram hashtag has no verified owner. That's word of mouth — one sparkling New Year's glass at a time — not a campaign.

In this episode:
- The numbers behind the wave, and why "no brand in the searches" is the most telling one
- The party calendar that drives it: mid-December, late October, early February — every year
- Dana's winning round: by usage, this is still mostly a cake product, and the drinks are the fast-growing new job
- Why this one behaves differently from unicorn toast: repeating occasions plus one-pinch effort
- The honest math of joining: about 0.1 grams a glass, roughly 15 cents a pour

Who should skip it: opaque drinks (coffee, cola, milk punch) hide shimmer entirely; the powder is flavorless, so skip it if you want taste; and without a party on the calendar, wait — the jar isn't the magic, the party is.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon — flake-style, built to stay visible in the glass; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Why are glitter drinks suddenly everywhere? Because the demand is real and measurable — and nobody is behind it.

Amazon search data shows over 2.4 million searches for this category in a single year, with drink-specific searches growing several times faster than general glitter terms — "edible glitter for drinks" grew more than eightfold year over year. The tell: more than 9 in 10 of those searches carry no brand name, and the category's one real Instagram hashtag has no verified owner. That's word of mouth — one sparkling New Year's glass at a time — not a campaign.

In this episode:
- The numbers behind the wave, and why "no brand in the searches" is the most telling one
- The party calendar that drives it: mid-December, late October, early February — every year
- Dana's winning round: by usage, this is still mostly a cake product, and the drinks are the fast-growing new job
- Why this one behaves differently from unicorn toast: repeating occasions plus one-pinch effort
- The honest math of joining: about 0.1 grams a glass, roughly 15 cents a pour

Who should skip it: opaque drinks (coffee, cola, milk punch) hide shimmer entirely; the powder is flavorless, so skip it if you want taste; and without a party on the calendar, wait — the jar isn't the magic, the party is.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter is on Amazon — flake-style, built to stay visible in the glass; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/44938e2e/bcadb472.mp3" length="8101171" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>505</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Your feed isn't lying — the searches really did multiply. But nobody owns the wave, and that's the most interesting part.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Your feed isn't lying — the searches really did multiply. But nobody owns the wave, and that's the most interesting part.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>glitter drinks, edible glitter for drinks, drink glitter, shimmer drinks, cocktail glitter, edible glitter trend, sparkling cocktails, party drinks, edible glitter, drink trends</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/44938e2e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buying Edible Glitter in Bulk: Event Math and Discounts</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>39</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Buying Edible Glitter in Bulk: Event Math and Discounts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7029f27b-3466-4bac-846d-6b399f299a18</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/87a2d7b5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you buy edible glitter in bulk for an event — a wedding toast, a gala bar, a school fundraiser pouring 200 cups?

The answer is to buy by the serving, not the bag. One drink takes about 0.1 grams, so a 10 g jar carries about 100 servings and a 15 g jar about 150. Count your drinks, divide by the jar, add a spare for headroom. And the discounts aren't a negotiation: on Amazon, quantity pricing for business buyers is printed on the listing, from 5% off at 2 units up to 20% off at 50 or more. For almost every real event, "bulk" means a handful of jars — not a kilo bag.

In this episode:
- The 200-cup fundraiser budget, worked out loud — about 30 dollars of shimmer, roughly 15 cents a cup
- Why the giant mystery bag wins on price per gram and still loses the event
- The three questions to ask any supplier before buying sparkle at scale — ingredient list, safety data sheet, named color additives
- What happens when a venue, client, or health department asks "can you show me?"
- The published discount ladder, and who actually reaches the 20% tier

Who should skip it: events under 100 drinks need one jar, not a case. Display-only decor should use craft glitter at craft prices. And if the drink menu is opaque, move the sparkle budget to the dessert table.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g jar is on Amazon — about 150 drink servings, with quantity discounts from the second jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you buy edible glitter in bulk for an event — a wedding toast, a gala bar, a school fundraiser pouring 200 cups?

The answer is to buy by the serving, not the bag. One drink takes about 0.1 grams, so a 10 g jar carries about 100 servings and a 15 g jar about 150. Count your drinks, divide by the jar, add a spare for headroom. And the discounts aren't a negotiation: on Amazon, quantity pricing for business buyers is printed on the listing, from 5% off at 2 units up to 20% off at 50 or more. For almost every real event, "bulk" means a handful of jars — not a kilo bag.

In this episode:
- The 200-cup fundraiser budget, worked out loud — about 30 dollars of shimmer, roughly 15 cents a cup
- Why the giant mystery bag wins on price per gram and still loses the event
- The three questions to ask any supplier before buying sparkle at scale — ingredient list, safety data sheet, named color additives
- What happens when a venue, client, or health department asks "can you show me?"
- The published discount ladder, and who actually reaches the 20% tier

Who should skip it: events under 100 drinks need one jar, not a case. Display-only decor should use craft glitter at craft prices. And if the drink menu is opaque, move the sparkle budget to the dessert table.

The MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g jar is on Amazon — about 150 drink servings, with quantity discounts from the second jar; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/87a2d7b5/a707a7aa.mp3" length="9201236" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>574</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>"Bulk" sounds like a warehouse problem — until you count servings. Most events need a handful of jars, and the discounts are printed on the page.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>"Bulk" sounds like a warehouse problem — until you count servings. Most events need a handful of jars, and the discounts are printed on the page.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter bulk, edible glitter for events, wedding toast glitter, edible glitter wholesale, drink glitter, edible glitter for drinks, event planning, champagne toast, luster dust, quantity discounts</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/87a2d7b5/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Halloween Edible Glitter Guide: Drinks, Bakes, and Palettes</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>38</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Halloween Edible Glitter Guide: Drinks, Bakes, and Palettes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d165f643-371a-4afa-a7ac-2a0288b48044</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9f2a6442</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you plan a Halloween party with edible glitter? Three decisions, three weekends — and no October 30th panic-buy.

Pick the palette first: orange is the anchor, black is the contrast shade, purple joins for potion drinks, and green only if slime is on the menu. Then split the jobs — flaky drink glitter for the clear pours, fine luster dust for the bakes. The serving is 0.1 grams, so a 10 g jar pours about 100 servings: two jars cover a full party, with plenty left over for winter baking.

In this episode:
- The two-jar shopping list that runs a 24-person party — and the order to buy the other shades in
- Why opaque orange punch swallows shimmer, and the clear pours that read as witch's potions instead
- The oven rule for glittered bakes: what survives the heat, and where sparkle actually gets seen
- A three-weekend countdown — menu, rehearsal pour, bake day — that beats the late-October rush
- The porch-light rehearsal trick that checks your look before you commit three dozen cupcakes to it

Who should skip it: if your Halloween is a candy bowl and a porch light, you don't need any of this — and if you're decorating displays nobody will eat, cheaper craft glitter is the honest buy. All-opaque drink menus should skip the drink jar and put the shimmer on the dessert table.

The shades from this episode are on Amazon: MONÉGASQUE Orange Beach, Lavender Fields, Midnight Black, and Emerald Green drink glitter (10 g jars), plus Orange, Purple, Black, and Green in the luster dust line — about $15 a jar as of publish; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you plan a Halloween party with edible glitter? Three decisions, three weekends — and no October 30th panic-buy.

Pick the palette first: orange is the anchor, black is the contrast shade, purple joins for potion drinks, and green only if slime is on the menu. Then split the jobs — flaky drink glitter for the clear pours, fine luster dust for the bakes. The serving is 0.1 grams, so a 10 g jar pours about 100 servings: two jars cover a full party, with plenty left over for winter baking.

In this episode:
- The two-jar shopping list that runs a 24-person party — and the order to buy the other shades in
- Why opaque orange punch swallows shimmer, and the clear pours that read as witch's potions instead
- The oven rule for glittered bakes: what survives the heat, and where sparkle actually gets seen
- A three-weekend countdown — menu, rehearsal pour, bake day — that beats the late-October rush
- The porch-light rehearsal trick that checks your look before you commit three dozen cupcakes to it

Who should skip it: if your Halloween is a candy bowl and a porch light, you don't need any of this — and if you're decorating displays nobody will eat, cheaper craft glitter is the honest buy. All-opaque drink menus should skip the drink jar and put the shimmer on the dessert table.

The shades from this episode are on Amazon: MONÉGASQUE Orange Beach, Lavender Fields, Midnight Black, and Emerald Green drink glitter (10 g jars), plus Orange, Purple, Black, and Green in the luster dust line — about $15 a jar as of publish; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9f2a6442/1c9a2b36.mp3" length="16186592" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1011</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Orange, black, purple — and green only if slime made the menu. The three-decision plan that beats the October 30th panic-buy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Orange, black, purple — and green only if slime made the menu. The three-decision plan that beats the October 30th panic-buy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>halloween edible glitter, edible glitter for drinks, halloween party drinks, luster dust, halloween baking, edible glitter colors, halloween cupcakes, potion drinks, drink glitter, halloween treats</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/9f2a6442/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Edible Glitter Vegan? What Mineral Origin Means</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>37</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is Edible Glitter Vegan? What Mineral Origin Means</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61082f88-c950-41b4-843c-4b46fc165add</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/baa9bc84</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter vegan? Mineral-based sparkle contains no animal derivatives — but not every jar earns the word.

For mineral-based glitter like MONÉGASQUE's, yes. Per the technical data sheet it is made entirely from minerals — no animal derivatives — and is listed as suitable for vegans and vegetarians. The full palette is mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxides, titanium dioxide in some shades, and synthetic FD&amp;C colorants. But "vegan-suitable" is not "vegan-certified": no outside auditor has issued a certificate, so we don't use that word. For any other jar, the ingredient list is the check.

In this episode: the whole mineral recipe, read out loud — why the sparkle is a rock trick, with nothing animal-derived in it. The real difference between "vegan-suitable" and "vegan-certified," and why a spec sheet isn't an audit — Dana wins that round. The one-line label check that works on any brand, plus the silent-label red flag: the category's most common ingredient complaint is sellers listing no ingredients at all. And why "it's just a pinch" isn't an answer — vegan is an origin question, not a dose question.

Who should skip it: if your event or kitchen requires certified vegan with paper on file, we can't hand you that today — buy from a brand that can show you the certificate. And if you avoid synthetic dyes, check your shade first: some colors use FD&amp;C colorants, while a few are mica-based pigments only, per the spec sheet.

The jars from this episode: the MONÉGASQUE 7 g luster dust baking line, on Amazon — about $10 a jar at publish; check the listing for current pricing. Color additives, explained by the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter vegan? Mineral-based sparkle contains no animal derivatives — but not every jar earns the word.

For mineral-based glitter like MONÉGASQUE's, yes. Per the technical data sheet it is made entirely from minerals — no animal derivatives — and is listed as suitable for vegans and vegetarians. The full palette is mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxides, titanium dioxide in some shades, and synthetic FD&amp;C colorants. But "vegan-suitable" is not "vegan-certified": no outside auditor has issued a certificate, so we don't use that word. For any other jar, the ingredient list is the check.

In this episode: the whole mineral recipe, read out loud — why the sparkle is a rock trick, with nothing animal-derived in it. The real difference between "vegan-suitable" and "vegan-certified," and why a spec sheet isn't an audit — Dana wins that round. The one-line label check that works on any brand, plus the silent-label red flag: the category's most common ingredient complaint is sellers listing no ingredients at all. And why "it's just a pinch" isn't an answer — vegan is an origin question, not a dose question.

Who should skip it: if your event or kitchen requires certified vegan with paper on file, we can't hand you that today — buy from a brand that can show you the certificate. And if you avoid synthetic dyes, check your shade first: some colors use FD&amp;C colorants, while a few are mica-based pigments only, per the spec sheet.

The jars from this episode: the MONÉGASQUE 7 g luster dust baking line, on Amazon — about $10 a jar at publish; check the listing for current pricing. Color additives, explained by the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/baa9bc84/dc6058dd.mp3" length="4521342" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>282</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sparkle from rocks, not animals — but “vegan-suitable” and “vegan-certified” are different claims. The label tells you which one you got.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sparkle from rocks, not animals — but “vegan-suitable” and “vegan-certified” are different claims. The label tells you which one you got.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>vegan edible glitter, is edible glitter vegan, vegan cake decorations, vegan luster dust, edible glitter ingredients, dairy free edible glitter, vegan baking sparkle</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/baa9bc84/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Glitter Mocktails for Kids' Parties: Simple and Sparkly</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>36</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Glitter Mocktails for Kids' Parties: Simple and Sparkly</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf4b19c8-2501-4109-a653-4fd9fb4d2159</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a1f60547</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Glitter mocktails for a kids' party cost about 15 cents a cup — if you follow one rule: clear drinks, clear cups.

Pick a clear, fizzy base — sparkling lemonade is the workhorse — pour into clear plastic cups, add a pinch of edible glitter (about 0.1 grams), and stir right before serving so the sparkle is still swirling when small hands grab the cups. The glitter is flavorless and odorless, adds no sugar of its own, and runs roughly 15 cents a cup — about 30 if you double the pinch for drama.

In this episode: the three-step recipe you can run while the cake cools; the clear-cup rule that saves the whole effect (Dana's win); the party-budget math for a dozen cups; the review evidence that kitchens — not bars — are where drink glitter actually lives; and the ten-second label check every parent should do, because "edible" and "non-toxic" are not the same word.

Sticking with juice boxes and paper cups? Skip the jar — nobody will see the sparkle. And for display pieces nobody eats, cheaper craft glitter does that job.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter discussed is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Glitter mocktails for a kids' party cost about 15 cents a cup — if you follow one rule: clear drinks, clear cups.

Pick a clear, fizzy base — sparkling lemonade is the workhorse — pour into clear plastic cups, add a pinch of edible glitter (about 0.1 grams), and stir right before serving so the sparkle is still swirling when small hands grab the cups. The glitter is flavorless and odorless, adds no sugar of its own, and runs roughly 15 cents a cup — about 30 if you double the pinch for drama.

In this episode: the three-step recipe you can run while the cake cools; the clear-cup rule that saves the whole effect (Dana's win); the party-budget math for a dozen cups; the review evidence that kitchens — not bars — are where drink glitter actually lives; and the ten-second label check every parent should do, because "edible" and "non-toxic" are not the same word.

Sticking with juice boxes and paper cups? Skip the jar — nobody will see the sparkle. And for display pieces nobody eats, cheaper craft glitter does that job.

The MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter discussed is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a1f60547/f57992fa.mp3" length="8443894" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>527</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Clear base, clear cups, one pinch, stir at serving — about 15 cents a cup. The kids' party trick that's cheaper than the napkins.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Clear base, clear cups, one pinch, stir at serving — about 15 cents a cup. The kids' party trick that's cheaper than the napkins.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>glitter mocktails for kids, edible glitter for drinks, kids party drink ideas, sparkling lemonade party drinks, edible glitter safe for kids, glitter drinks for birthday party, how much edible glitter per drink</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/a1f60547/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Long Does Drink Glitter Stay Visible in a Glass?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>35</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How Long Does Drink Glitter Stay Visible in a Glass?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1bb1faa0-5574-47b4-a1c8-0c4a069dc83a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b5ba95a0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How long does drink glitter stay visible? It never fades — it just stops moving. And one stir starts the show again.

Drink glitter never stops being visible — it stops moving. The mineral flakes don't dissolve or fade, even in citrus or soda. In a bubbly drink, carbonation keeps the sparkle swirling as long as the fizz lasts, so pre-pouring is safe. In a still drink, the swirl slows within minutes and the flakes settle — and one stir brings the whole show back. Batch bubbly ahead; glitter still drinks at serving time.

In this episode: the suspension physics in 3 numbers — why 50-500 micron flakes are built to hang in liquid, why a mineral roughly 3 times heavier than water settles anyway, and why citrus and soda can't break the sparkle down. The pre-pour playbook for a batched party: what you can pour an hour ahead, the pinch-in-the-empty-glass trick that makes the pour do the stirring, and the pitcher stir that serves every glass mid-swirl. Dana's round, won outright: the honest answer isn't a time — it's whatever keeps the drink moving. And the 5-second rescue for a glass that's gone quiet, plus the reviewer wisdom on clear drinks — visibility is backdrop as much as motion.

Who should skip it: if your drinks are opaque — coffee, cola, anything milky — the shimmer disappears, and a still, self-serve pitcher nobody stirs will carpet its bottom in gold. Put the sparkle on the dessert instead, or glitter the empty cups.

The Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter from the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How long does drink glitter stay visible? It never fades — it just stops moving. And one stir starts the show again.

Drink glitter never stops being visible — it stops moving. The mineral flakes don't dissolve or fade, even in citrus or soda. In a bubbly drink, carbonation keeps the sparkle swirling as long as the fizz lasts, so pre-pouring is safe. In a still drink, the swirl slows within minutes and the flakes settle — and one stir brings the whole show back. Batch bubbly ahead; glitter still drinks at serving time.

In this episode: the suspension physics in 3 numbers — why 50-500 micron flakes are built to hang in liquid, why a mineral roughly 3 times heavier than water settles anyway, and why citrus and soda can't break the sparkle down. The pre-pour playbook for a batched party: what you can pour an hour ahead, the pinch-in-the-empty-glass trick that makes the pour do the stirring, and the pitcher stir that serves every glass mid-swirl. Dana's round, won outright: the honest answer isn't a time — it's whatever keeps the drink moving. And the 5-second rescue for a glass that's gone quiet, plus the reviewer wisdom on clear drinks — visibility is backdrop as much as motion.

Who should skip it: if your drinks are opaque — coffee, cola, anything milky — the shimmer disappears, and a still, self-serve pitcher nobody stirs will carpet its bottom in gold. Put the sparkle on the dessert instead, or glitter the empty cups.

The Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter from the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b5ba95a0/2039468e.mp3" length="4511313" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>281</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Glitter never fades in the glass — it just stops moving. Bubbles keep it dancing for hours; in a still drink, one stir restarts the show.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Glitter never fades in the glass — it just stops moving. Bubbles keep it dancing for hours; in a still drink, one stir restarts the show.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>drink glitter, edible glitter for drinks, glitter cocktails, how long does edible glitter last in a drink, batch cocktails with glitter, edible glitter for champagne, cocktail shimmer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b5ba95a0/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spooky Halloween Glitter Drinks: Black and Purple Potions</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>34</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Spooky Halloween Glitter Drinks: Black and Purple Potions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b664aa3f-8a36-45a6-9a75-00118ff5dbf4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b20f8398</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Spooky glitter drinks run backwards: the potion look comes from a clear base and a dark shade, not a black drink.

Build the drink on a clear base — sparkling lemonade, tonic, clear soda, or prosecco — and let a dark glitter shade do the spooky work. A black pour swallows light, so shimmer disappears; in a clear pour, dark flakes read like smoke. Use about 0.1 grams a glass, double it in a dim room, and add the pinch right before serving so the swirl happens in front of your guests.

In this episode: the 3-decision potion formula — clear base, dark shade, serve-time pinch; why black drinks hide glitter while clear pours turn it into smoke in a glass; the 4-color Halloween palette (orange, purple, black, green) and which jar does which job; the doubling math that keeps 50 party pours at fun-size-candy money; and the hot-cider round Dana wins outright.

Who should skip it: if your whole table is opaque pours — hot cider, cocoa, cream punch — or you're after actual glow-in-the-dark drinks, glitter can't beat that physics; put the budget into the treats instead.

The Halloween shades named in the episode — the Midnight Black, Lavender Fields, and Orange Beach 10g drink glitters — are on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Spooky glitter drinks run backwards: the potion look comes from a clear base and a dark shade, not a black drink.

Build the drink on a clear base — sparkling lemonade, tonic, clear soda, or prosecco — and let a dark glitter shade do the spooky work. A black pour swallows light, so shimmer disappears; in a clear pour, dark flakes read like smoke. Use about 0.1 grams a glass, double it in a dim room, and add the pinch right before serving so the swirl happens in front of your guests.

In this episode: the 3-decision potion formula — clear base, dark shade, serve-time pinch; why black drinks hide glitter while clear pours turn it into smoke in a glass; the 4-color Halloween palette (orange, purple, black, green) and which jar does which job; the doubling math that keeps 50 party pours at fun-size-candy money; and the hot-cider round Dana wins outright.

Who should skip it: if your whole table is opaque pours — hot cider, cocoa, cream punch — or you're after actual glow-in-the-dark drinks, glitter can't beat that physics; put the budget into the treats instead.

The Halloween shades named in the episode — the Midnight Black, Lavender Fields, and Orange Beach 10g drink glitters — are on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b20f8398/acedb7f5.mp3" length="8275459" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>516</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The spooky drink trick runs backwards: clear base, dark glitter. Black pours hide the shimmer - clear ones turn it into smoke.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The spooky drink trick runs backwards: clear base, dark glitter. Black pours hide the shimmer - clear ones turn it into smoke.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>halloween glitter drinks,spooky halloween drinks,edible glitter for drinks,black edible glitter,purple drink glitter,halloween party drinks,potion drinks for halloween</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b20f8398/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Starter Edible Glitter Colors: Build a Small Palette</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>33</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Best Starter Edible Glitter Colors: Build a Small Palette</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a6e1ec4-01f3-4348-a0ae-73c9fe9590a2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d9a1367d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter colors should you buy first? Gold, silver, then a celebration shade — the starter palette, solved.

Start with gold and silver: in every quarter of 2025, each was the most common add-on to the other, in the drinks line and the cakes line alike. Add one celebration shade third — an iridescent jar that flatters any theme. Going past three? The 12-color set works out to about $0.71 per gram versus roughly $1.43 for single 7g jars — real savings, but only if your calendar will open at least half the jars.

In this episode: the 3-jar starter palette real cart patterns support; why metallics outlast every party theme — and when pink jumps the line; the seasonal add-ons that finish the drawer (the Halloween and Christmas palettes); the per-gram math on the 12-color set and the 4-occasions test to run before you buy it.

Who should skip it: one-party, one-theme decorators (buy a single jar in your theme color), drinks-only households (the set is fine luster dust for cakes — pick flake-style drink glitter for the glass), and anyone who already owns the metallics.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color gift set (12 x 7g luster dust jars, 84g total, sifter caps) is on Amazon — $59.99 standard price as of July 2026; check the live listing for today's price.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter colors should you buy first? Gold, silver, then a celebration shade — the starter palette, solved.

Start with gold and silver: in every quarter of 2025, each was the most common add-on to the other, in the drinks line and the cakes line alike. Add one celebration shade third — an iridescent jar that flatters any theme. Going past three? The 12-color set works out to about $0.71 per gram versus roughly $1.43 for single 7g jars — real savings, but only if your calendar will open at least half the jars.

In this episode: the 3-jar starter palette real cart patterns support; why metallics outlast every party theme — and when pink jumps the line; the seasonal add-ons that finish the drawer (the Halloween and Christmas palettes); the per-gram math on the 12-color set and the 4-occasions test to run before you buy it.

Who should skip it: one-party, one-theme decorators (buy a single jar in your theme color), drinks-only households (the set is fine luster dust for cakes — pick flake-style drink glitter for the glass), and anyone who already owns the metallics.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color gift set (12 x 7g luster dust jars, 84g total, sifter caps) is on Amazon — $59.99 standard price as of July 2026; check the live listing for today's price.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d9a1367d/a1369dcc.mp3" length="8253725" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>515</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Gold first, silver second, one celebration shade third. The 12-color set halves the per-gram price — if your calendar earns it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gold first, silver second, one celebration shade third. The 12-color set halves the per-gram price — if your calendar earns it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>best edible glitter colors, edible glitter starter set, edible glitter colors for beginners, luster dust color set, edible glitter gift set, edible glitter for cakes, which edible glitter to buy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d9a1367d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Much Edible Glitter Is Too Much? A Serving-Size Answer</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>32</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How Much Edible Glitter Is Too Much? A Serving-Size Answer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33a15154-8e39-4919-af2a-7ce73310f64f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3182903a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter is too much? The serving is a 0.1-gram pinch, and the FDA already set the pigment ceiling.

Used as decoration, you run out of drink long before you hit a limit. The listed serving is 0.1 grams per drink — double it for a richer color — so a 10 g jar pours about 100 servings. FDA color-additive rules cap mica-based pearlescent pigments at 1.25% of a food's weight, and a decorating pinch sits far below that ceiling. The practical limit is visual: past a double pinch, drinks turn cloudy, not sparklier.

In this episode:
- The one-pinch serving — 0.1 grams — that stretches a 10 g jar to about 100 drinks.
- The FDA's 1.25% pigment cap (21 CFR 73.350), translated into plain kitchen logic.
- What the safety data sheets actually say about swallowing glitter — route-precise, no spin.
- The lab-test number some sites misuse as a "safe amount," and why this show won't repeat it.

Who should skip it: if your household avoids color additives — by choice or on a doctor's advice — the right amount of glitter is zero, and your desserts will taste exactly the same without it.

Try the serving math yourself: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g edible drink glitter, on Amazon — about $15 at publish; check the listing for today's price. The regulation quoted in this episode: FDA 21 CFR 73.350, mica-based pearlescent pigments — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-73/subpart-A/section-73.350

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter is too much? The serving is a 0.1-gram pinch, and the FDA already set the pigment ceiling.

Used as decoration, you run out of drink long before you hit a limit. The listed serving is 0.1 grams per drink — double it for a richer color — so a 10 g jar pours about 100 servings. FDA color-additive rules cap mica-based pearlescent pigments at 1.25% of a food's weight, and a decorating pinch sits far below that ceiling. The practical limit is visual: past a double pinch, drinks turn cloudy, not sparklier.

In this episode:
- The one-pinch serving — 0.1 grams — that stretches a 10 g jar to about 100 drinks.
- The FDA's 1.25% pigment cap (21 CFR 73.350), translated into plain kitchen logic.
- What the safety data sheets actually say about swallowing glitter — route-precise, no spin.
- The lab-test number some sites misuse as a "safe amount," and why this show won't repeat it.

Who should skip it: if your household avoids color additives — by choice or on a doctor's advice — the right amount of glitter is zero, and your desserts will taste exactly the same without it.

Try the serving math yourself: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g edible drink glitter, on Amazon — about $15 at publish; check the listing for today's price. The regulation quoted in this episode: FDA 21 CFR 73.350, mica-based pearlescent pigments — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-73/subpart-A/section-73.350

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3182903a/ade2e39b.mp3" length="4418950" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>275</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>You'll run out of drink before you hit a limit: the serving is a 0.1-gram pinch, and FDA rules cap the pigment at 1.25% of the food's weight.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>You'll run out of drink before you hit a limit: the serving is a 0.1-gram pinch, and FDA rules cap the pigment at 1.25% of the food's weight.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how much edible glitter is too much, edible glitter serving size, is edible glitter safe to eat, how much glitter per drink, edible glitter FDA rules, edible glitter for drinks</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/3182903a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Gold Dust vs Gold Leaf: Which Finish and When</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>31</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Gold Dust vs Gold Leaf: Which Finish and When</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e11e89c-5fe3-4911-9690-6469fa54aeb2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/350d4bd7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Edible gold dust has no gold in it — and it still does most of the work. When to use dust, when leaf, and when both.

Gold dust and gold leaf aren't two versions of one product — they're two tools. Dust is a fine mineral powder (mica, titanium dioxide, iron oxide) that brushes on as an allover metallic sheen across cakes, candy, chocolate, and sparkling drinks. Leaf is real 24K gold, placed as one solid accent where the eye should land. Coverage comes from dust at about a dollar a gram; the mirror focal point comes from leaf. Working decorators buy both.

In this episode:
- What gold dust is actually made of — and why "no gold" is exactly why the price works
- The math per job: about $15 for a 15 g jar, roughly a dollar a gram, cents of powder per cake or glass
- The one job dust can't fake — Dana's round, and she keeps it
- How pros stack dust and leaf on one dessert so it reads as a finish, not a nice try
- Who should skip the jar, and who should skip the leaf

Who should skip it: skip the jar if your whole gold plan is one accent on one cake, once — a small pack of leaf covers you. Skip leaf-only if the job is an allover gold tier or a party run of gold-rimmed glasses — that's dust work.

Try the coverage half: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g luster dust on Amazon — about $15 as of publish; check the listing for current pricing.
How color additives are regulated in the US: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-73

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Edible gold dust has no gold in it — and it still does most of the work. When to use dust, when leaf, and when both.

Gold dust and gold leaf aren't two versions of one product — they're two tools. Dust is a fine mineral powder (mica, titanium dioxide, iron oxide) that brushes on as an allover metallic sheen across cakes, candy, chocolate, and sparkling drinks. Leaf is real 24K gold, placed as one solid accent where the eye should land. Coverage comes from dust at about a dollar a gram; the mirror focal point comes from leaf. Working decorators buy both.

In this episode:
- What gold dust is actually made of — and why "no gold" is exactly why the price works
- The math per job: about $15 for a 15 g jar, roughly a dollar a gram, cents of powder per cake or glass
- The one job dust can't fake — Dana's round, and she keeps it
- How pros stack dust and leaf on one dessert so it reads as a finish, not a nice try
- Who should skip the jar, and who should skip the leaf

Who should skip it: skip the jar if your whole gold plan is one accent on one cake, once — a small pack of leaf covers you. Skip leaf-only if the job is an allover gold tier or a party run of gold-rimmed glasses — that's dust work.

Try the coverage half: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g luster dust on Amazon — about $15 as of publish; check the listing for current pricing.
How color additives are regulated in the US: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-73

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/350d4bd7/5a1131ed.mp3" length="7305788" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>456</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Gold dust has no gold in it — and still does most of the work. Dust for the allover sheen, real 24K leaf for the focal point. Pros finish with both.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gold dust has no gold in it — and still does most of the work. Dust for the allover sheen, real 24K leaf for the focal point. Pros finish with both.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible gold dust, edible gold leaf, gold dust vs gold leaf, gold luster dust for cakes, 24k edible gold leaf, edible gold for drinks, gold cake decorating</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/350d4bd7/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Halloween Baking With Edible Glitter: Easy Spooky Bakes</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>30</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Halloween Baking With Edible Glitter: Easy Spooky Bakes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e531490-f7ec-4734-9fe6-092a4f21a1fc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/77b58798</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pumpkin molds, skull pans, orange glitter — fall baskets tell a story. Here's how to make Halloween bakes sparkle.

Give shimmer a dark canvas — chocolate, black buttercream, or deep purple frosting — then brush one accent shade on dry at the very end, hitting only the raised details of molded cakes. Orange anchors the Halloween palette; real buyers pair it with purple, black, and green. Edible glitter is a heat-stable mineral pigment, so it can even go into the oven on cookies and breads. Start small: you can't un-glitter a cupcake.

In this episode:
- The dark-canvas rule that keeps orange glitter from vanishing on orange frosting.
- A dry-brush move that makes skull and pumpkin cakes look carved, not flat.
- What the safety data sheet says about heat — and why the oven can't hurt the shimmer.
- The one-word label check that keeps craft glitter off your cupcakes.
- A pinch-sized plan for a spooky drink the kids' table will talk about.

Who should skip it: if your Halloween is a costume and a bagged-candy bowl, you have nothing to dust — skip the jar. Same if you need bold color rather than shimmer; that's a job for gel food coloring.

The cake-sized jars: MONÉGASQUE 7g Baking Luster Dust line on Amazon — $9.99 per color as of July 2026 (orange, black, green, and violet cover the Halloween palette).
More on FDA color-additive rules: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Pumpkin molds, skull pans, orange glitter — fall baskets tell a story. Here's how to make Halloween bakes sparkle.

Give shimmer a dark canvas — chocolate, black buttercream, or deep purple frosting — then brush one accent shade on dry at the very end, hitting only the raised details of molded cakes. Orange anchors the Halloween palette; real buyers pair it with purple, black, and green. Edible glitter is a heat-stable mineral pigment, so it can even go into the oven on cookies and breads. Start small: you can't un-glitter a cupcake.

In this episode:
- The dark-canvas rule that keeps orange glitter from vanishing on orange frosting.
- A dry-brush move that makes skull and pumpkin cakes look carved, not flat.
- What the safety data sheet says about heat — and why the oven can't hurt the shimmer.
- The one-word label check that keeps craft glitter off your cupcakes.
- A pinch-sized plan for a spooky drink the kids' table will talk about.

Who should skip it: if your Halloween is a costume and a bagged-candy bowl, you have nothing to dust — skip the jar. Same if you need bold color rather than shimmer; that's a job for gel food coloring.

The cake-sized jars: MONÉGASQUE 7g Baking Luster Dust line on Amazon — $9.99 per color as of July 2026 (orange, black, green, and violet cover the Halloween palette).
More on FDA color-additive rules: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/77b58798/616e0abf.mp3" length="8806683" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>549</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dark canvas, one accent shade, a dry brush - and yes, it survives the oven. How real bakers make Halloween cakes and cookies sparkle.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dark canvas, one accent shade, a dry brush - and yes, it survives the oven. How real bakers make Halloween cakes and cookies sparkle.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>halloween edible glitter, halloween cake decorating, edible glitter for halloween treats, skull cake pan ideas, pumpkin mold cake, luster dust for cakes, halloween baking ideas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/77b58798/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Halloween Edible Glitter Colors: Orange, Purple, and Black</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>29</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Halloween Edible Glitter Colors: Orange, Purple, and Black</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c64c90f-234a-4135-a9fb-8fa1f2cb3f4c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7c7fc4e1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What are the best Halloween edible glitter colors? The fall shopping carts already voted: orange, purple, and black.

Orange, purple, and black are the core Halloween palette, with green as the optional fourth for slime and monster bakes. That ranking comes from real fall behavior: orange orders roughly quadruple into the season, and purple, black, and green ride along in the same carts. Start with orange if you're buying one jar, add black for contrast on light frosting, purple for potion drinks, and green only if your menu calls for it.

In this episode:
- Which jar to buy first if you only have one shopping trip left before the party
- Why black glitter vanishes on chocolate frosting — and where it actually shows up
- The serving math that keeps a Halloween jar useful long after November 1
- The four-color buying order, from anchor shade to optional extra

Who should skip it: if your Halloween is a candy bowl and store-bought treats, you don't need glitter at all — and if you're decorating displays nobody will eat, cheaper craft glitter is the honest buy.

The shades from this episode are on Amazon: MONÉGASQUE Orange Beach, Lavender Fields, and Midnight Black drink glitter (10 g jars), plus Orange, Purple, and Black luster dust (15 g jars) — about $15 a jar as of publish; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What are the best Halloween edible glitter colors? The fall shopping carts already voted: orange, purple, and black.

Orange, purple, and black are the core Halloween palette, with green as the optional fourth for slime and monster bakes. That ranking comes from real fall behavior: orange orders roughly quadruple into the season, and purple, black, and green ride along in the same carts. Start with orange if you're buying one jar, add black for contrast on light frosting, purple for potion drinks, and green only if your menu calls for it.

In this episode:
- Which jar to buy first if you only have one shopping trip left before the party
- Why black glitter vanishes on chocolate frosting — and where it actually shows up
- The serving math that keeps a Halloween jar useful long after November 1
- The four-color buying order, from anchor shade to optional extra

Who should skip it: if your Halloween is a candy bowl and store-bought treats, you don't need glitter at all — and if you're decorating displays nobody will eat, cheaper craft glitter is the honest buy.

The shades from this episode are on Amazon: MONÉGASQUE Orange Beach, Lavender Fields, and Midnight Black drink glitter (10 g jars), plus Orange, Purple, and Black luster dust (15 g jars) — about $15 a jar as of publish; check the listing for current pricing.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7c7fc4e1/2ecfcedb.mp3" length="4261380" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>265</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Orange, purple, and black — green off the bench. The Halloween glitter palette, straight from what fall shopping carts actually do.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Orange, purple, and black — green off the bench. The Halloween glitter palette, straight from what fall shopping carts actually do.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>halloween edible glitter, edible glitter colors, black edible glitter, orange edible glitter, halloween cupcake decorations, edible glitter for halloween drinks, halloween cake decorating</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7c7fc4e1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Glitter Cocktails for Bar Menus: Cost Per Pour and Technique</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>28</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Glitter Cocktails for Bar Menus: Cost Per Pour and Technique</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e3f3d54-2cb3-4095-89bc-751a6f315741</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7df075b1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do bars put glitter cocktails on the menu? The sparkle costs about 15 cents a pour — technique is the hard part.

A glitter cocktail costs a bar about 15 cents of shimmer per pour: the listed serving is 0.1 grams, so a 10 gram jar covers about 100 drinks. Build it on clear spirits, add the glitter at the glass or in a rolled batch bottle, and let bubbles or one swirl keep the flakes moving. Run it as one signature serve, and quantity discounts of 5-20% cover a season's stock.

In this episode:
- The per-pour math you can hand your bar manager — 15 cents on paper, booked at 30 because Friday nights exist
- A dosing method that survives a real rush, and the batch-bottle habit that replaces theatrical pinches
- Which builds actually show the sparkle — and why clear, bubbly serves win
- The Amazon Business quantity ladder for stocking a season (5-20% off by volume)
- An honest read on which rooms a glitter serve fits — and which it never will

Who should skip it: bars whose lists are built on opaque pours — espresso martinis, cream drinks, stouts — and rooms whose brand is quiet and brown. Glitter you can't see is invisible money, and no per-pour math makes sparkle fit a room that doesn't sell celebration.

The jar in this episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold edible drink glitter, 10 g, flake-style so it stays visible in the pour — on Amazon ($14.99 at publish; check the live listing for current pricing and quantity discounts).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do bars put glitter cocktails on the menu? The sparkle costs about 15 cents a pour — technique is the hard part.

A glitter cocktail costs a bar about 15 cents of shimmer per pour: the listed serving is 0.1 grams, so a 10 gram jar covers about 100 drinks. Build it on clear spirits, add the glitter at the glass or in a rolled batch bottle, and let bubbles or one swirl keep the flakes moving. Run it as one signature serve, and quantity discounts of 5-20% cover a season's stock.

In this episode:
- The per-pour math you can hand your bar manager — 15 cents on paper, booked at 30 because Friday nights exist
- A dosing method that survives a real rush, and the batch-bottle habit that replaces theatrical pinches
- Which builds actually show the sparkle — and why clear, bubbly serves win
- The Amazon Business quantity ladder for stocking a season (5-20% off by volume)
- An honest read on which rooms a glitter serve fits — and which it never will

Who should skip it: bars whose lists are built on opaque pours — espresso martinis, cream drinks, stouts — and rooms whose brand is quiet and brown. Glitter you can't see is invisible money, and no per-pour math makes sparkle fit a room that doesn't sell celebration.

The jar in this episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold edible drink glitter, 10 g, flake-style so it stays visible in the pour — on Amazon ($14.99 at publish; check the live listing for current pricing and quantity discounts).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7df075b1/42327f75.mp3" length="7821558" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>488</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The sparkle in a glitter cocktail costs a bar about 15 cents a pour. The real work is technique: clear builds, bubbles, and a batch-bottle habit.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The sparkle in a glitter cocktail costs a bar about 15 cents a pour. The real work is technique: clear builds, bubbles, and a batch-bottle habit.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>glitter cocktails, edible glitter for drinks, drink glitter for cocktails, glitter cocktail cost per pour, edible glitter bulk, cocktail glitter for bar menus</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7df075b1/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter in Coffee? Heat and Visibility, Explained</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>27</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter in Coffee? Heat and Visibility, Explained</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c5cd6a5d-f92c-456b-ba37-ae7284001312</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d52e93d0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in hot coffee? Heat isn't the problem — the color of your coffee is.

Yes — edible glitter handles hot drinks without trouble. The safety data sheet lists the powder as chemically stable and acid-resistant, and one mineral component doesn't melt until around 3,000 degrees Celsius, so a hot coffee doesn't faze it. It's odorless and flavorless, so the cup tastes the same. The real catch is visibility: coffee is opaque, and sparkle needs light. Stirred into the body of the drink, it disappears — the move is a pinch on top.

In this episode: why heat can't hurt a mineral powder — the 3,000-degree fact from the safety data sheet, plus what coffee's acidity does to it (nothing). The clear-drinks rule from an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews, and why coffee flunks it — Dana wins that round outright. The top-of-the-drink trick: whipped cream, milk foam, and marshmallows as the sparkle's stage, added right before you serve. And what a 0.1 g pinch does to taste — nothing at all.

Who should skip it: if you drink black coffee from a dark mug and want the swirling galaxy effect, save your pinch — that effect needs a clear drink. And if you're hoping glitter adds flavor, it won't; it's decoration, not syrup.

The jar from this episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g edible glitter, on Amazon — about $15 at publish; check the listing for current pricing. Color additives, explained by the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter in hot coffee? Heat isn't the problem — the color of your coffee is.

Yes — edible glitter handles hot drinks without trouble. The safety data sheet lists the powder as chemically stable and acid-resistant, and one mineral component doesn't melt until around 3,000 degrees Celsius, so a hot coffee doesn't faze it. It's odorless and flavorless, so the cup tastes the same. The real catch is visibility: coffee is opaque, and sparkle needs light. Stirred into the body of the drink, it disappears — the move is a pinch on top.

In this episode: why heat can't hurt a mineral powder — the 3,000-degree fact from the safety data sheet, plus what coffee's acidity does to it (nothing). The clear-drinks rule from an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews, and why coffee flunks it — Dana wins that round outright. The top-of-the-drink trick: whipped cream, milk foam, and marshmallows as the sparkle's stage, added right before you serve. And what a 0.1 g pinch does to taste — nothing at all.

Who should skip it: if you drink black coffee from a dark mug and want the swirling galaxy effect, save your pinch — that effect needs a clear drink. And if you're hoping glitter adds flavor, it won't; it's decoration, not syrup.

The jar from this episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g edible glitter, on Amazon — about $15 at publish; check the listing for current pricing. Color additives, explained by the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d52e93d0/ed78556e.mp3" length="4468685" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>278</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hot coffee won't hurt edible glitter — heat isn't the problem. Opacity is. Here's where sparkle actually shows in a hot drink.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hot coffee won't hurt edible glitter — heat isn't the problem. Opacity is. Here's where sparkle actually shows in a hot drink.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter in coffee, edible glitter hot drinks, can you put edible glitter in coffee, edible glitter hot chocolate, is edible glitter heat-stable, edible glitter for lattes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d52e93d0/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter for Weddings: How Much for Toasts and Cake</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>26</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter for Weddings: How Much for Toasts and Cake</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4149a558-e7ef-4726-82f0-f9caea7a59ee</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/69ec333a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter does a wedding need? One 10g jar covers 100 glasses on paper — weddings should plan for 2.

Plan 2 jars per 100 toast glasses. The label serving is 0.1 grams a glass — 100 servings from a 10 g jar, about 15 cents a pour — but wedding pours double the pinch so it reads in photos, which halves the jar. Champagne is the easiest drink in the room: clear enough to show the shimmer, carbonated enough to keep it moving. The jar count is easy; the pour plan is the real job.

In this episode: The jars-per-100-glasses formula — and the doubling rule that changes your order. Why champagne and sparkling cider beat any signature cocktail for glitter: the bubbles stir it for you. A pour plan that survives a real reception — a glitter captain, a sixty-fourth-teaspoon spoon, tray-by-tray dosing. The gold-and-ivory shopping list: the gold and silver duo, plus the 24K gold leaf upgrade for the head table. And what the 5%-to-20% quantity ladder means for planners versus one-wedding buyers.

Who should skip it: couples toasting with dark or opaque pours (shimmer nobody can see), venues that don't allow anything added to poured drinks, and 20-guest micro-weddings — 1 jar is genuinely all you need.

The jar in this episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter — $14.99 on Amazon (price as of publish).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter does a wedding need? One 10g jar covers 100 glasses on paper — weddings should plan for 2.

Plan 2 jars per 100 toast glasses. The label serving is 0.1 grams a glass — 100 servings from a 10 g jar, about 15 cents a pour — but wedding pours double the pinch so it reads in photos, which halves the jar. Champagne is the easiest drink in the room: clear enough to show the shimmer, carbonated enough to keep it moving. The jar count is easy; the pour plan is the real job.

In this episode: The jars-per-100-glasses formula — and the doubling rule that changes your order. Why champagne and sparkling cider beat any signature cocktail for glitter: the bubbles stir it for you. A pour plan that survives a real reception — a glitter captain, a sixty-fourth-teaspoon spoon, tray-by-tray dosing. The gold-and-ivory shopping list: the gold and silver duo, plus the 24K gold leaf upgrade for the head table. And what the 5%-to-20% quantity ladder means for planners versus one-wedding buyers.

Who should skip it: couples toasting with dark or opaque pours (shimmer nobody can see), venues that don't allow anything added to poured drinks, and 20-guest micro-weddings — 1 jar is genuinely all you need.

The jar in this episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter — $14.99 on Amazon (price as of publish).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/69ec333a/e01252fe.mp3" length="8634486" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>539</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One 10g jar covers a 100-glass toast on paper. Weddings pour double - plan 2 jars per 100 glasses, and put someone in charge of the pour.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One 10g jar covers a 100-glass toast on paper. Weddings pour double - plan 2 jars per 100 glasses, and put someone in charge of the pour.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for weddings, champagne toast glitter, edible glitter for champagne, wedding cake glitter, gold edible glitter for drinks, edible glitter bulk, wedding dessert table sparkle</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/69ec333a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Toxic vs Edible Glitter: The Label Difference That Matters</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>25</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Non-Toxic vs Edible Glitter: The Label Difference That Matters</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">afc2beff-a9c2-4bec-b0f2-c6304fe4f7b1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/cf41304a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What's the difference between non-toxic and edible glitter? One is food. The other just promises not to poison you.

Non-toxic means a product probably won't harm you if a little ends up in a mouth — the standard crayons meet. It is not a food claim. Edible means the product is food: made to be eaten, sold as food, with an ingredient list to prove it. If sparkle is going on anything people will eat or drink, the label needs the word edible and actual ingredients printed on it. Non-toxic alone is a no.

In this episode:
- Walk out able to sort any sparkle jar into "food" or "decor" in 10 seconds flat.
- The 4-line label checklist: the word, the ingredient list, the regulation-sounding names, and the one phrase that means walk away.
- Why "food grade" and "food safe" are not the same promise — and which one to trust.
- The real-buyer stories: in an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews, 9.5% of negative mentions came down to "it turned out not to be edible."
- What the FDA actually asks of decorating dust, in plain language.

Who should skip it: if nothing you're decorating goes near a mouth — display pieces, ornaments, craft projects — regular craft glitter is cheaper and made for exactly that job. And if your jar already says edible and lists its ingredients, you don't need to buy anything today.

The jar that does it right: MONÉGASQUE Gold Edible Glitter, 15 g — ingredient list on the jar, about $15 on Amazon (price as of publish; check the live listing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What's the difference between non-toxic and edible glitter? One is food. The other just promises not to poison you.

Non-toxic means a product probably won't harm you if a little ends up in a mouth — the standard crayons meet. It is not a food claim. Edible means the product is food: made to be eaten, sold as food, with an ingredient list to prove it. If sparkle is going on anything people will eat or drink, the label needs the word edible and actual ingredients printed on it. Non-toxic alone is a no.

In this episode:
- Walk out able to sort any sparkle jar into "food" or "decor" in 10 seconds flat.
- The 4-line label checklist: the word, the ingredient list, the regulation-sounding names, and the one phrase that means walk away.
- Why "food grade" and "food safe" are not the same promise — and which one to trust.
- The real-buyer stories: in an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews, 9.5% of negative mentions came down to "it turned out not to be edible."
- What the FDA actually asks of decorating dust, in plain language.

Who should skip it: if nothing you're decorating goes near a mouth — display pieces, ornaments, craft projects — regular craft glitter is cheaper and made for exactly that job. And if your jar already says edible and lists its ingredients, you don't need to buy anything today.

The jar that does it right: MONÉGASQUE Gold Edible Glitter, 15 g — ingredient list on the jar, about $15 on Amazon (price as of publish; check the live listing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/cf41304a/21787c37.mp3" length="14321243" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>894</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Non-toxic means it won't poison you — a crayon promise. Edible means food, with an ingredient list. That label line decides what goes on the cake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Non-toxic means it won't poison you — a crayon promise. Edible means food, with an ingredient list. That label line decides what goes on the cake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>non-toxic vs edible glitter, is edible glitter actually edible, edible glitter safety, craft glitter on cakes, edible glitter ingredients, food grade glitter, luster dust vs craft glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/cf41304a/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Apply Edible Glitter Without the Mess</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>24</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How to Apply Edible Glitter Without the Mess</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">03d383d5-ec5a-4768-99ce-521c7cb4505b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7a9f48d9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you apply edible glitter without making a mess? Fix the dose, not your technique — a serving is 0.1 grams.

The mess is a dose problem, not a skill problem. A serving of edible glitter is 0.1 grams — a pinch — while most kitchen tools are built for tablespoons. Close the gap with three moves: a precision spoon (down to 1/64 teaspoon) instead of fingers, parchment under your work to funnel strays back into the jar, and a sifter cap so you tap sparkle out instead of pouring it.

In this episode:
- The 0.1-gram rule: why one pinch is a full serving, and how far a 10 g jar really stretches (about 100 servings).
- The three-tool system — precision spoon, parchment catch-sheet, sifter cap — and the mess each one ends.
- The category's own confession: an analysis of about 2,400 reviews shows buyers asking for shaker lids and included spoons by name.
- The drink rule: when to add the pinch so the sparkle arrives with the glass, not 20 minutes before it.

Who should skip this: if you decorate once or twice a year, skip the gear — a pinch over a paper plate gets you most of the way, and paper is free. One-color households can skip multi-color sets too; a single jar covers you.

Try it at your table: the MONÉGASQUE 12-Color Gift Set — every color ships with its own built-in sifter cap — is on Amazon ($49.99 as of publish; check the listing for current pricing).
Why "edible" is the word that matters, from the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/food/alerts-advisories-safety-information/fda-advises-home-and-commercial-bakers-avoid-use-non-edible-food-decorative-products

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you apply edible glitter without making a mess? Fix the dose, not your technique — a serving is 0.1 grams.

The mess is a dose problem, not a skill problem. A serving of edible glitter is 0.1 grams — a pinch — while most kitchen tools are built for tablespoons. Close the gap with three moves: a precision spoon (down to 1/64 teaspoon) instead of fingers, parchment under your work to funnel strays back into the jar, and a sifter cap so you tap sparkle out instead of pouring it.

In this episode:
- The 0.1-gram rule: why one pinch is a full serving, and how far a 10 g jar really stretches (about 100 servings).
- The three-tool system — precision spoon, parchment catch-sheet, sifter cap — and the mess each one ends.
- The category's own confession: an analysis of about 2,400 reviews shows buyers asking for shaker lids and included spoons by name.
- The drink rule: when to add the pinch so the sparkle arrives with the glass, not 20 minutes before it.

Who should skip this: if you decorate once or twice a year, skip the gear — a pinch over a paper plate gets you most of the way, and paper is free. One-color households can skip multi-color sets too; a single jar covers you.

Try it at your table: the MONÉGASQUE 12-Color Gift Set — every color ships with its own built-in sifter cap — is on Amazon ($49.99 as of publish; check the listing for current pricing).
Why "edible" is the word that matters, from the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/food/alerts-advisories-safety-information/fda-advises-home-and-commercial-bakers-avoid-use-non-edible-food-decorative-products

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7a9f48d9/9417fb55.mp3" length="4329911" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>270</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The mess isn't your technique — it's the dose. A tiny spoon, a parchment catch, and a sifter cap put the sparkle where you aimed it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The mess isn't your technique — it's the dose. A tiny spoon, a parchment catch, and a sifter cap put the sparkle where you aimed it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how to apply edible glitter, edible glitter without mess, edible glitter sifter cap, how much edible glitter per serving, edible glitter for cupcakes, edible glitter gift set, edible glitter measuring spoon</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/7a9f48d9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Choose Edible Glitter for Cocktails: Five Criteria</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>23</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How to Choose Edible Glitter for Cocktails: Five Criteria</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e58e7071-0bf1-450a-842a-d2c6cf502114</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad39d64c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you choose edible glitter for cocktails? 5 checks beat any brand list — and you can run them in any store aisle.

Skip the rankings and run 5 checks on any jar: flakes, not fine dust — 50-500 microns is what stays visible in a drink; the word edible printed plainly, because non-toxic is not the same thing; a full ingredient list you can read before buying; price per drink, never per jar — about $0.15 at 0.1 grams per serving; and one jar that works on drinks and desserts both. Pass all 5, buy with confidence.

In this episode: the store-aisle shortcut for judging flake size without ever measuring a micron; the category's most telling number — in review data, over 66.6% of ingredient complaints are about information that's simply missing, and how to use that as your filter; the division that turns a 15-dollar sticker into about 15 cents a glass; and the round Dana wins outright — why per-serving math is only honest at your real usage, plus the two-job jar that fixes it.

Who should skip it: if your drinks are opaque (cola, creamy coffee cocktails, stouts), the sparkle is invisible — spend nothing; if you need shimmer for exactly one party, split a jar with a friend instead of buying your own; and if nobody's eating or drinking what you're decorating, decoration-only glitter is cheaper and made for that — it just never goes near food.

The jar from the episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing) — flake-style, built for the glass, with the full ingredient list on the label.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you choose edible glitter for cocktails? 5 checks beat any brand list — and you can run them in any store aisle.

Skip the rankings and run 5 checks on any jar: flakes, not fine dust — 50-500 microns is what stays visible in a drink; the word edible printed plainly, because non-toxic is not the same thing; a full ingredient list you can read before buying; price per drink, never per jar — about $0.15 at 0.1 grams per serving; and one jar that works on drinks and desserts both. Pass all 5, buy with confidence.

In this episode: the store-aisle shortcut for judging flake size without ever measuring a micron; the category's most telling number — in review data, over 66.6% of ingredient complaints are about information that's simply missing, and how to use that as your filter; the division that turns a 15-dollar sticker into about 15 cents a glass; and the round Dana wins outright — why per-serving math is only honest at your real usage, plus the two-job jar that fixes it.

Who should skip it: if your drinks are opaque (cola, creamy coffee cocktails, stouts), the sparkle is invisible — spend nothing; if you need shimmer for exactly one party, split a jar with a friend instead of buying your own; and if nobody's eating or drinking what you're decorating, decoration-only glitter is cheaper and made for that — it just never goes near food.

The jar from the episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing) — flake-style, built for the glass, with the full ingredient list on the label.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ad39d64c/4056736d.mp3" length="8246201" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>514</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Forget brand lists. 5 checks — flakes, the word edible, a real ingredient list, price per drink, one two-job jar — pick the right glitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Forget brand lists. 5 checks — flakes, the word edible, a real ingredient list, price per drink, one two-job jar — pick the right glitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for cocktails, how to choose edible glitter, drink glitter that won't clump, best edible glitter for drinks, food grade drink glitter, edible glitter cost per drink</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad39d64c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Plastic in Edible Glitter? Craft vs Food-Grade Facts</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Plastic in Edible Glitter? Craft vs Food-Grade Facts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0dca886-38e1-4690-a4f7-3f13dacfb780</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/aabacaff</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is there plastic in edible glitter? Real edible glitter is minerals and food dye — the plastic is one aisle over.

The verdict: genuinely edible glitter contains no plastic. Across our line, the full ingredient list is 7 items — mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and 4 FD&amp;C food dyes. Minerals and food colorants, nothing that can shed microplastic. But the worry is earned: craft glitter really is plastic, it sits one aisle over, and "non-toxic" on a label has never meant made to be eaten. The word to trust is "edible," backed by a printed ingredient list.

In this episode: the full 7-item ingredient list, read line by line in kitchen language; the 30-second jar flip that separates food-grade sparkle from craft glitter; why "non-toxic" is a crayon word, not a food word; where the FDA's real luster-dust contamination cases came from; and honest options for families avoiding synthetic dyes, including single-ingredient shimmer shades.

Decorating something nobody will eat — a display gingerbread house, ornaments, a photo prop? Skip edible entirely and buy craft glitter; it's cheaper and that's exactly what it's for.

The MONÉGASQUE 7g baking line is on Amazon — 13 colors, the full ingredient list printed on every jar, $9.99 a jar as of publish (check the live listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is there plastic in edible glitter? Real edible glitter is minerals and food dye — the plastic is one aisle over.

The verdict: genuinely edible glitter contains no plastic. Across our line, the full ingredient list is 7 items — mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and 4 FD&amp;C food dyes. Minerals and food colorants, nothing that can shed microplastic. But the worry is earned: craft glitter really is plastic, it sits one aisle over, and "non-toxic" on a label has never meant made to be eaten. The word to trust is "edible," backed by a printed ingredient list.

In this episode: the full 7-item ingredient list, read line by line in kitchen language; the 30-second jar flip that separates food-grade sparkle from craft glitter; why "non-toxic" is a crayon word, not a food word; where the FDA's real luster-dust contamination cases came from; and honest options for families avoiding synthetic dyes, including single-ingredient shimmer shades.

Decorating something nobody will eat — a display gingerbread house, ornaments, a photo prop? Skip edible entirely and buy craft glitter; it's cheaper and that's exactly what it's for.

The MONÉGASQUE 7g baking line is on Amazon — 13 colors, the full ingredient list printed on every jar, $9.99 a jar as of publish (check the live listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/aabacaff/d63a7f3a.mp3" length="8454340" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>527</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Real edible glitter is minerals and food dye — no plastic. The scare belongs to craft glitter one aisle over. One label check settles it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Real edible glitter is minerals and food dye — no plastic. The scare belongs to craft glitter one aisle over. One label check settles it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>plastic in edible glitter,is edible glitter safe,microplastics in food glitter,edible glitter ingredients,edible glitter vs craft glitter,food grade glitter,edible glitter for cakes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/aabacaff/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Most Popular Edible Glitter Colors, According to the Data</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Most Popular Edible Glitter Colors, According to the Data</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5a4119e-55f2-47da-b858-b80cd1d62395</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/13332e2b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter color do people actually buy? The data has a clear favorite — and one surprise everyone underestimates.

Quick answer from an Ask the Table short: gold anchors the category — it pairs with silver so reliably that the two are each other's most common add-on — while an iridescent shift shade is the quiet gateway color new buyers grab first. Seasonal palettes flip the board twice a year: orange-purple-black for Halloween, red-green for Christmas.

In this episode: the color popularity ranking real purchase patterns support; the Classic Metallics pairing; why iridescent converts first-timers; and the two seasonal windows when the "wrong" colors become the right ones.

The Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter is on Amazon — 4.6 stars across thousands of ratings (check the live listing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Which edible glitter color do people actually buy? The data has a clear favorite — and one surprise everyone underestimates.

Quick answer from an Ask the Table short: gold anchors the category — it pairs with silver so reliably that the two are each other's most common add-on — while an iridescent shift shade is the quiet gateway color new buyers grab first. Seasonal palettes flip the board twice a year: orange-purple-black for Halloween, red-green for Christmas.

In this episode: the color popularity ranking real purchase patterns support; the Classic Metallics pairing; why iridescent converts first-timers; and the two seasonal windows when the "wrong" colors become the right ones.

The Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter is on Amazon — 4.6 stars across thousands of ratings (check the live listing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/13332e2b/2e3239a0.mp3" length="4711521" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>294</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Which edible glitter color do people actually buy? The data has a clear favorite — and one surprise everyone underestimates.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Which edible glitter color do people actually buy? The data has a clear favorite — and one surprise everyone underestimates.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>most popular edible glitter colors, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/13332e2b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Makes Edible Glitter Shiny? The Mica Science</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>20</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>What Makes Edible Glitter Shiny? The Mica Science</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14b8d96c-b740-451e-b860-9bb6791b75e2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/67ce19df</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What makes edible glitter shiny? Not gold — layers. Mineral flakes stack reflections until your eye reads shimmer.

Edible glitter shines because of stacked layers, not metal. Every shade is built on mica, a mineral that splits into thin, flat flakes. Those flakes carry whisper-thin coats of mineral pigment — titanium dioxide and iron oxide in the gold — so light bounces off every layer and reaches your eye as shimmer. Fine 5-25 micron luster dust reads as a smooth sheen; 50-500 micron flakes twinkle one by one.

In this episode:
- The gold recipe, read straight from the safety data sheet — mica, titanium dioxide, iron oxide — and why there is no metallic gold in the jar.
- Why luster dust glows while drink glitter twinkles: the 5-25 vs 50-500 micron difference, minus the jargon.
- How single-ingredient shades like Iridescent Butterfly and Magic Rainbow shift color with zero added pigment.
- Dana's winning round: the room is an ingredient — how to stage sparkle so it actually shows.
- A sunny-window test that previews any jar's sparkle before you ever open it.

Honest skip list: if you want the mirror shine of real gold (that's edible gold leaf, a different product), if your event happens in low light, or if you're hoping it adds flavor — it's flavorless on purpose.

The reference jar from this episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold Edible Glitter (15 g luster dust) on Amazon — about $15 at the time of publish. Curious about the rules behind it? Mica-based pearlescent pigments are listed in the FDA's color-additive regulations at 21 CFR 73.350.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What makes edible glitter shiny? Not gold — layers. Mineral flakes stack reflections until your eye reads shimmer.

Edible glitter shines because of stacked layers, not metal. Every shade is built on mica, a mineral that splits into thin, flat flakes. Those flakes carry whisper-thin coats of mineral pigment — titanium dioxide and iron oxide in the gold — so light bounces off every layer and reaches your eye as shimmer. Fine 5-25 micron luster dust reads as a smooth sheen; 50-500 micron flakes twinkle one by one.

In this episode:
- The gold recipe, read straight from the safety data sheet — mica, titanium dioxide, iron oxide — and why there is no metallic gold in the jar.
- Why luster dust glows while drink glitter twinkles: the 5-25 vs 50-500 micron difference, minus the jargon.
- How single-ingredient shades like Iridescent Butterfly and Magic Rainbow shift color with zero added pigment.
- Dana's winning round: the room is an ingredient — how to stage sparkle so it actually shows.
- A sunny-window test that previews any jar's sparkle before you ever open it.

Honest skip list: if you want the mirror shine of real gold (that's edible gold leaf, a different product), if your event happens in low light, or if you're hoping it adds flavor — it's flavorless on purpose.

The reference jar from this episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold Edible Glitter (15 g luster dust) on Amazon — about $15 at the time of publish. Curious about the rules behind it? Mica-based pearlescent pigments are listed in the FDA's color-additive regulations at 21 CFR 73.350.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/67ce19df/dbc8d5d9.mp3" length="8734370" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>545</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There's no gold in gold glitter. The shine is stacked mineral layers bouncing light — mica, two pigments, and geometry.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There's no gold in gold glitter. The shine is stacked mineral layers bouncing light — mica, two pigments, and geometry.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>what makes edible glitter shiny, how does edible glitter work, edible glitter for drinks, gold edible glitter, luster dust vs glitter, mica edible glitter, iridescent edible glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/67ce19df/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Label Checklist: Five Things to Look For</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Label Checklist: Five Things to Look For</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd06d9ef-f5fd-4391-a032-e49192ca1b73</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bb6322f4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Two jars, same sparkle, same unicorn — one is food, one won't say. Five label checks settle it in 30 seconds.

You can tell if glitter is really edible from the label alone. Check five things: an ingredient list that actually exists; names you can look up — mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxide, FD&amp;C colors; the word edible stated plainly with the food named; no dodge words like non-toxic or for-decoration-only; and food-label basics such as a serving amount and a date. No ingredient list? No sale — that one check filters most of the category's trouble.

In this episode: the category's labeling gap, sized honestly — in an analysis of about 2,400 reviews, more than 66% of ingredient complaints were about missing information, not scary ingredients; the FDA's own tell for genuinely edible glitter, and where contamination stories actually trace back to; a Sparkle Lab decode of FD&amp;C color names, so you can verify a label from your phone in the aisle; the two dodge words that quietly mean "this is not food"; and Dana's one-glance shortcut for shopping with a kid on the cart.

Decorating something nobody will eat? Skip the checklist and the food price — craft glitter is cheaper and fine for display pieces, props, and school-fair showstoppers that live in a frame.

The 12-color gift set discussed is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Two jars, same sparkle, same unicorn — one is food, one won't say. Five label checks settle it in 30 seconds.

You can tell if glitter is really edible from the label alone. Check five things: an ingredient list that actually exists; names you can look up — mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxide, FD&amp;C colors; the word edible stated plainly with the food named; no dodge words like non-toxic or for-decoration-only; and food-label basics such as a serving amount and a date. No ingredient list? No sale — that one check filters most of the category's trouble.

In this episode: the category's labeling gap, sized honestly — in an analysis of about 2,400 reviews, more than 66% of ingredient complaints were about missing information, not scary ingredients; the FDA's own tell for genuinely edible glitter, and where contamination stories actually trace back to; a Sparkle Lab decode of FD&amp;C color names, so you can verify a label from your phone in the aisle; the two dodge words that quietly mean "this is not food"; and Dana's one-glance shortcut for shopping with a kid on the cart.

Decorating something nobody will eat? Skip the checklist and the food price — craft glitter is cheaper and fine for display pieces, props, and school-fair showstoppers that live in a frame.

The 12-color gift set discussed is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bb6322f4/fc7adf61.mp3" length="8914516" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>556</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Really edible glitter proves it on the label: a full ingredient list, look-up-able names, and the word edible — no 'decoration only' dodge.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Really edible glitter proves it on the label: a full ingredient list, look-up-able names, and the word edible — no 'decoration only' dodge.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter, is glitter really edible, edible glitter ingredients, food grade glitter, edible glitter label, non-toxic vs edible glitter, edible glitter for cakes</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/bb6322f4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Glitter Drinks Too Faint? The Double-Serving Fix</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Glitter Drinks Too Faint? The Double-Serving Fix</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e398eae7-1374-4afd-a2c1-3bab0fba15c4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/e3dc7341</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you make a glitter drink more vibrant? The fix is printed on the jar — and it costs about a dime a glass.

Use more — the serving guidance printed on the listing says you can achieve a richer color by doubling the serving. Even doubled, the glitter in one drink costs roughly 20 to 30 cents, and a 15 g jar still pours about 75 drinks. Before you spend the extra dime, take the free fixes: a clear, pale drink, a see-through glass, and light behind the table. Sparkle is light with somewhere to bounce.

In this episode: the label's own vibrancy fix, and the per-glass math that makes doubling painless. The order of operations — the free fixes to try before you pour more glitter. Why gold reads muddy in dark punch, and how to pick drinks that actually glow. An honest look at color complaints in category reviews, so you know what a jar can and can't promise.

Who should skip it: if your signature drink is dark or opaque — cola, red punch, hot chocolate — no serving size will read through it. Skip the glitter in that glass and put the sparkle on the dessert instead.

Try the fix: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g luster dust for drinks, on Amazon — about $15 at publish time (check the listing for today's price). Even doubling every pour, one jar covers about 75 drinks.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you make a glitter drink more vibrant? The fix is printed on the jar — and it costs about a dime a glass.

Use more — the serving guidance printed on the listing says you can achieve a richer color by doubling the serving. Even doubled, the glitter in one drink costs roughly 20 to 30 cents, and a 15 g jar still pours about 75 drinks. Before you spend the extra dime, take the free fixes: a clear, pale drink, a see-through glass, and light behind the table. Sparkle is light with somewhere to bounce.

In this episode: the label's own vibrancy fix, and the per-glass math that makes doubling painless. The order of operations — the free fixes to try before you pour more glitter. Why gold reads muddy in dark punch, and how to pick drinks that actually glow. An honest look at color complaints in category reviews, so you know what a jar can and can't promise.

Who should skip it: if your signature drink is dark or opaque — cola, red punch, hot chocolate — no serving size will read through it. Skip the glitter in that glass and put the sparkle on the dessert instead.

Try the fix: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g luster dust for drinks, on Amazon — about $15 at publish time (check the listing for today's price). Even doubling every pour, one jar covers about 75 drinks.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/e3dc7341/1913bd72.mp3" length="4297314" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>268</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do you make a glitter drink more vibrant? The fix is printed on the jar — and it costs about a dime a glass.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do you make a glitter drink more vibrant? The fix is printed on the jar — and it costs about a dime a glass.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how to make glitter drinks more vibrant, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/e3dc7341/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter on Chocolate and Strawberries: What Works</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter on Chocolate and Strawberries: What Works</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b632ac5-2e90-443f-8286-dda1b27e368d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ba562917</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter on chocolate and strawberries? Yes — but stir it into the melt and the chocolate eats it.

Yes. Chocolate and candy are listed uses on the product's own technical sheet, and chocolate-covered strawberries are one of the easiest wins in dessert. The one rule: sparkle goes on the chocolate, never in it. Sprinkle glitter flakes while the dip is still wet, or brush luster dust on once it sets. Stirred into melted chocolate, the powder soaks up cocoa butter and the shimmer disappears.

In this episode: why stirred-in shimmer vanishes — the oil-absorption number that explains the "chocolate ate my glitter" mystery. The two-method tray: flakes on wet chocolate for sparkle, luster dust on set chocolate for sheen — and which jar does which job. An honest answer on how far a jar goes on berries (the label's serving math is written for drinks, and we say so). And the chocolatier-box upgrade: gold glitter plus 24K edible gold leaf on the crown berry.

Who should skip it: bake sales and arm's-length crowds — regular sprinkles read fine from across a hallway and cost less — and anyone hoping to tint a whole batch of melted chocolate with shimmer, because the bowl always wins.

The jar in this episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter — $14.99 on Amazon (price as of publish).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you put edible glitter on chocolate and strawberries? Yes — but stir it into the melt and the chocolate eats it.

Yes. Chocolate and candy are listed uses on the product's own technical sheet, and chocolate-covered strawberries are one of the easiest wins in dessert. The one rule: sparkle goes on the chocolate, never in it. Sprinkle glitter flakes while the dip is still wet, or brush luster dust on once it sets. Stirred into melted chocolate, the powder soaks up cocoa butter and the shimmer disappears.

In this episode: why stirred-in shimmer vanishes — the oil-absorption number that explains the "chocolate ate my glitter" mystery. The two-method tray: flakes on wet chocolate for sparkle, luster dust on set chocolate for sheen — and which jar does which job. An honest answer on how far a jar goes on berries (the label's serving math is written for drinks, and we say so). And the chocolatier-box upgrade: gold glitter plus 24K edible gold leaf on the crown berry.

Who should skip it: bake sales and arm's-length crowds — regular sprinkles read fine from across a hallway and cost less — and anyone hoping to tint a whole batch of melted chocolate with shimmer, because the bowl always wins.

The jar in this episode: MONÉGASQUE Iconic Gold 10 g drink glitter — $14.99 on Amazon (price as of publish).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ba562917/721b9f63.mp3" length="7916431" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>494</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yes — chocolate is a listed use on the spec sheet. But stir shimmer into the melt and it vanishes. Sparkle goes on the chocolate, never in it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yes — chocolate is a listed use on the spec sheet. But stir shimmer into the melt and it vanishes. Sparkle goes on the chocolate, never in it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for chocolate covered strawberries, edible glitter for chocolate, how to apply edible glitter to chocolate, edible glitter strawberries, luster dust on chocolate, gold edible glitter for strawberries</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ba562917/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Drinks for Edible Glitter: Why Clear Pours Win</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Best Drinks for Edible Glitter: Why Clear Pours Win</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c191858-7344-4650-9eb8-644b8c3bf41f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b35f70b3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What drinks does edible glitter work best in? Clear pours — the same pinch that dazzles champagne dies in a cola.

Edible glitter works best in clear, see-through drinks: champagne, prosecco, a gin and tonic, sparkling lemonade, white sangria. Light has to pass through the liquid and bounce off the flakes — no light, no sparkle. And "clear" means see-through, not colorless: pink lemonade works, an espresso martini doesn't. Bubbles are a bonus, since carbonation keeps the shimmer swirling on its own. An analysis of about 2,400 category reviews says it plainly: it works best with clear drinks.

In this episode: the two-second see-through test that tells you whether any drink will sparkle before you waste a pinch; why champagne keeps winning — and what the search numbers say about wine, beer, and lemonade; the sleeper pick that covers the kids' table at the same party; and the timing move for drinks that are clear but not bubbly.

Who should skip it: if your whole menu is dark or creamy — colas, stouts, espresso martinis, hot chocolate — drink glitter will perform for no one. Save the sparkle for the dessert instead.

The Gold 15-gram jar from this episode is the MONÉGASQUE Gold 15g on Amazon (about $15 at publish — check the listing for today's price).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What drinks does edible glitter work best in? Clear pours — the same pinch that dazzles champagne dies in a cola.

Edible glitter works best in clear, see-through drinks: champagne, prosecco, a gin and tonic, sparkling lemonade, white sangria. Light has to pass through the liquid and bounce off the flakes — no light, no sparkle. And "clear" means see-through, not colorless: pink lemonade works, an espresso martini doesn't. Bubbles are a bonus, since carbonation keeps the shimmer swirling on its own. An analysis of about 2,400 category reviews says it plainly: it works best with clear drinks.

In this episode: the two-second see-through test that tells you whether any drink will sparkle before you waste a pinch; why champagne keeps winning — and what the search numbers say about wine, beer, and lemonade; the sleeper pick that covers the kids' table at the same party; and the timing move for drinks that are clear but not bubbly.

Who should skip it: if your whole menu is dark or creamy — colas, stouts, espresso martinis, hot chocolate — drink glitter will perform for no one. Save the sparkle for the dessert instead.

The Gold 15-gram jar from this episode is the MONÉGASQUE Gold 15g on Amazon (about $15 at publish — check the listing for today's price).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b35f70b3/71fd0eba.mp3" length="4407658" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>275</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Clear pours win. If light gets through the drink, glitter plays — champagne first, see-through anything second, dark pours never.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Clear pours win. If light gets through the drink, glitter plays — champagne first, see-through anything second, dark pours never.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for drinks, best drinks for edible glitter, edible glitter for champagne, drink glitter for cocktails, glitter drinks, edible glitter for wine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b35f70b3/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Edible Glitter Safe to Eat? What the Safety Data Shows</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is Edible Glitter Safe to Eat? What the Safety Data Shows</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d3ee61e4-b2ce-4252-8f50-1b476c551db6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2e9b3d0c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter safe to eat? Dana's daughter asked over lemonade — and the honest answer lives in the paperwork.

The verdict: genuinely edible glitter — made with FDA-listed color additives, sold as food with a full ingredient list — is a compliant food product; the danger in this category is decorative "non-toxic" glitter that was never meant to be swallowed. This episode reads the actual safety documents out loud and shows you the three things to check on any label before it touches food.

In this episode: what the safety data sheets really say, translated from chemistry into kitchen language; the FDA color-additive rules behind the word "edible"; the label checklist that takes fifteen seconds; and where the category's real horror stories come from (hint: not the edible products).

If you already trust your jar and just want technique, the drinks and cupcake episodes are waiting.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter safe to eat? Dana's daughter asked over lemonade — and the honest answer lives in the paperwork.

The verdict: genuinely edible glitter — made with FDA-listed color additives, sold as food with a full ingredient list — is a compliant food product; the danger in this category is decorative "non-toxic" glitter that was never meant to be swallowed. This episode reads the actual safety documents out loud and shows you the three things to check on any label before it touches food.

In this episode: what the safety data sheets really say, translated from chemistry into kitchen language; the FDA color-additive rules behind the word "edible"; the label checklist that takes fifteen seconds; and where the category's real horror stories come from (hint: not the edible products).

If you already trust your jar and just want technique, the drinks and cupcake episodes are waiting.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2e9b3d0c/a6b1ee50.mp3" length="15526215" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>969</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is edible glitter safe to eat? Dana's daughter asked over lemonade — and the honest answer lives in the paperwork.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is edible glitter safe to eat? Dana's daughter asked over lemonade — and the honest answer lives in the paperwork.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>is edible glitter safe to eat, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2e9b3d0c/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Does Drink Glitter Clump or Sink? Fixes That Work</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Does Drink Glitter Clump or Sink? Fixes That Work</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">505a5176-8a8d-4e5b-8250-9ba7328109a1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/477f4efc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why does drink glitter clump or sink? Usually it's not the jar — it's how the glitter went in. The fixes take seconds.

Clumping is a delivery problem, not a defect: too much powder, added too fast, in one spot. Sprinkle a 0.1-gram pinch thinly over a moving drink and it disperses clean. Sinking is physics — the shimmer is a mineral roughly 3 times heavier than water — so bubbles, a pre-serve swirl, or a pinch-in-the-cup pour keeps it dancing. And because it never dissolves, a settled drink comes back with one stir.

In this episode: the lily-pad autopsy — why a pinch poured in one spot builds a raft instead of a swirl, and the 3-part fix; the Sparkle Lab numbers behind sinking, including why 50-500 micron flakes are built to stay visible in liquid; the punch-bowl round Dana wins outright, plus the pre-toast stir and the glitter-the-cups rescue; and what doubling the serving really does, with the per-glass math that says the jar outlives the party.

Who should skip it: if your drinks are opaque, or your serve is a still, self-serve bowl nobody stirs, skip the glitter there — put the sparkle on the desserts or the rim instead.

The Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter mentioned in the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Why does drink glitter clump or sink? Usually it's not the jar — it's how the glitter went in. The fixes take seconds.

Clumping is a delivery problem, not a defect: too much powder, added too fast, in one spot. Sprinkle a 0.1-gram pinch thinly over a moving drink and it disperses clean. Sinking is physics — the shimmer is a mineral roughly 3 times heavier than water — so bubbles, a pre-serve swirl, or a pinch-in-the-cup pour keeps it dancing. And because it never dissolves, a settled drink comes back with one stir.

In this episode: the lily-pad autopsy — why a pinch poured in one spot builds a raft instead of a swirl, and the 3-part fix; the Sparkle Lab numbers behind sinking, including why 50-500 micron flakes are built to stay visible in liquid; the punch-bowl round Dana wins outright, plus the pre-toast stir and the glitter-the-cups rescue; and what doubling the serving really does, with the per-glass math that says the jar outlives the party.

Who should skip it: if your drinks are opaque, or your serve is a still, self-serve bowl nobody stirs, skip the glitter there — put the sparkle on the desserts or the rim instead.

The Iconic Gold 10g drink glitter mentioned in the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/477f4efc/d2a61a36.mp3" length="8564264" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>534</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Clumps mean the glitter went in wrong; sinking is just physics. A thinner pinch, a moving drink, and one well-timed stir fix nearly every fail.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Clumps mean the glitter went in wrong; sinking is just physics. A thinner pinch, a moving drink, and one well-timed stir fix nearly every fail.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter clumping, drink glitter sinks to bottom, how to keep glitter suspended in drinks, edible glitter that won't clump, how to use drink glitter, edible glitter for drinks</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/477f4efc/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Edible Glitter Sugar-Free? What the Ingredients Say</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is Edible Glitter Sugar-Free? What the Ingredients Say</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6c1ede47-80b8-4e8a-8bea-f95bed70f35b</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/60f1b3b4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter sugar-free? It looks like candy in a jar — the ingredient list says minerals. Here's how to read it.

Yes. Mineral-based edible glitter contains no sugar. The ingredient list across the MONÉGASQUE line is mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxides, titanium dioxide in some shades, and FD&amp;C food colorants — nothing sweet, nothing sweetened. The listing states it plainly: it adds sparkle and color without adding any sugar. And at 0.1 grams per drink, glitter adds shimmer to a glass, not flavor — your drink tastes exactly the same.

In this episode: the full ingredient palette, read out loud, so you know exactly what's in the jar. When a "sugar-free" label means something and when it's fat-free-water noise — Dana wins that round. The shelf trap that catches sugar-cutters: sweet sparkle like sanding sugar vs mineral glitter, and the one-line check that tells them apart. What glitter actually tastes like ("Tasteless" is the listed flavor attribute) and what a 0.1 g serving means in your glass. And the label habit that protects you from mystery shimmer — the category's most common ingredient complaint is sellers not listing ingredients at all.

Who should skip it: if you want sparkle you can taste, this is the wrong jar — sanding sugar is sweeter and cheaper. And if you avoid artificial color additives entirely, check your shade first: some colors use FD&amp;C colorants, while a few (Snow White and Liquid Gold among them, per the spec sheet) are mica-based pigments only.

The jar from this episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g edible glitter, on Amazon — about $15 at publish; check the listing for current pricing. Color additives, explained by the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is edible glitter sugar-free? It looks like candy in a jar — the ingredient list says minerals. Here's how to read it.

Yes. Mineral-based edible glitter contains no sugar. The ingredient list across the MONÉGASQUE line is mica-based pearlescent pigments, iron oxides, titanium dioxide in some shades, and FD&amp;C food colorants — nothing sweet, nothing sweetened. The listing states it plainly: it adds sparkle and color without adding any sugar. And at 0.1 grams per drink, glitter adds shimmer to a glass, not flavor — your drink tastes exactly the same.

In this episode: the full ingredient palette, read out loud, so you know exactly what's in the jar. When a "sugar-free" label means something and when it's fat-free-water noise — Dana wins that round. The shelf trap that catches sugar-cutters: sweet sparkle like sanding sugar vs mineral glitter, and the one-line check that tells them apart. What glitter actually tastes like ("Tasteless" is the listed flavor attribute) and what a 0.1 g serving means in your glass. And the label habit that protects you from mystery shimmer — the category's most common ingredient complaint is sellers not listing ingredients at all.

Who should skip it: if you want sparkle you can taste, this is the wrong jar — sanding sugar is sweeter and cheaper. And if you avoid artificial color additives entirely, check your shade first: some colors use FD&amp;C colorants, while a few (Snow White and Liquid Gold among them, per the spec sheet) are mica-based pigments only.

The jar from this episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15 g edible glitter, on Amazon — about $15 at publish; check the listing for current pricing. Color additives, explained by the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/60f1b3b4/1fe39d12.mp3" length="4491253" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>280</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is edible glitter sugar-free? It looks like candy in a jar — the ingredient list says minerals. Here's how to read it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is edible glitter sugar-free? It looks like candy in a jar — the ingredient list says minerals. Here's how to read it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>is edible glitter sugar free, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/60f1b3b4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter for Cupcakes and Cookies: An Easy How-To</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter for Cupcakes and Cookies: An Easy How-To</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1fb89a56-2eba-4938-a8fe-a8f0bf3d5bab</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/58a5b341</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[24 matte cupcakes taught Dana the lesson: on frosting, shimmer is a technique problem, not a quantity problem.

The short version: shake-and-pray fails because buttercream swallows loose glitter. The fix is dry-brush application on a set surface, timing the dusting after the crumb coat firms, and choosing fine luster dust for smooth sheen work — the 7-gram baking line exists for exactly this, $9.99 a jar across 13 colors.

In this episode: the Friday-night cupcake failure, reconstructed; brush, timing, and the frosting trick that keeps sparkle on top where eyes can see it; dust versus flakes for baked surfaces; and how one jar covers a class party with most of the jar left over.

If your project is drinks, not baking, skip back to the cocktail episodes — this one lives entirely on frosting.

The 7g luster dust baking line is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[24 matte cupcakes taught Dana the lesson: on frosting, shimmer is a technique problem, not a quantity problem.

The short version: shake-and-pray fails because buttercream swallows loose glitter. The fix is dry-brush application on a set surface, timing the dusting after the crumb coat firms, and choosing fine luster dust for smooth sheen work — the 7-gram baking line exists for exactly this, $9.99 a jar across 13 colors.

In this episode: the Friday-night cupcake failure, reconstructed; brush, timing, and the frosting trick that keeps sparkle on top where eyes can see it; dust versus flakes for baked surfaces; and how one jar covers a class party with most of the jar left over.

If your project is drinks, not baking, skip back to the cocktail episodes — this one lives entirely on frosting.

The 7g luster dust baking line is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/58a5b341/b92e8c6e.mp3" length="8533755" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>532</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>24 matte cupcakes taught Dana the lesson: on frosting, shimmer is a technique problem, not a quantity problem.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>24 matte cupcakes taught Dana the lesson: on frosting, shimmer is a technique problem, not a quantity problem.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter for cupcakes and cookies, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/58a5b341/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can You Bake Edible Glitter? Heat-Stable Facts for Bakers</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Can You Bake Edible Glitter? Heat-Stable Facts for Bakers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1eb8713-dd0c-4f6c-ab51-dd171a1ebfd4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d9b20cc6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can you bake edible glitter in the oven — or does the heat wreck the sparkle before the party even starts?

Yes — edible glitter bakes just fine. It's a mineral-based powder, and the spec sheet lists a melting point around 3,000 degrees Celsius for its key pigment, while a home oven tops out near 500 Fahrenheit. It won't dissolve, bleed, scorch, or change the flavor of your bake. The one mistake heat can't explain is mixing glitter into the batter, where the sparkle survives but nobody can ever see it.

In this episode: why a 3,000-degree melting point makes your oven irrelevant; the sprinkle problem glitter doesn't have — no bleeding, no color streaks; the unicorn-cake mistake, and why shimmer stirred into batter comes out invisible; the on-not-in rule for cookies, meringues, and fondant; and what more than a quarter of positive category reviews reveal about bakers and glitter.

Honest skip: if the dream is a glittery crumb — sparkle mixed through the inside of the cake — skip the jar. No glitter shines in the dark, ours included.

The jar from this episode is the MONÉGASQUE Gold 15g on Amazon (about $15 at publish; the 7g baking size runs $9.99 — prices as seen on publish day).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Can you bake edible glitter in the oven — or does the heat wreck the sparkle before the party even starts?

Yes — edible glitter bakes just fine. It's a mineral-based powder, and the spec sheet lists a melting point around 3,000 degrees Celsius for its key pigment, while a home oven tops out near 500 Fahrenheit. It won't dissolve, bleed, scorch, or change the flavor of your bake. The one mistake heat can't explain is mixing glitter into the batter, where the sparkle survives but nobody can ever see it.

In this episode: why a 3,000-degree melting point makes your oven irrelevant; the sprinkle problem glitter doesn't have — no bleeding, no color streaks; the unicorn-cake mistake, and why shimmer stirred into batter comes out invisible; the on-not-in rule for cookies, meringues, and fondant; and what more than a quarter of positive category reviews reveal about bakers and glitter.

Honest skip: if the dream is a glittery crumb — sparkle mixed through the inside of the cake — skip the jar. No glitter shines in the dark, ours included.

The jar from this episode is the MONÉGASQUE Gold 15g on Amazon (about $15 at publish; the 7g baking size runs $9.99 — prices as seen on publish day).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d9b20cc6/2547fa2f.mp3" length="4165666" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>259</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yes — the sparkle is mineral, with a melting point near 3,000 degrees. Your oven can't touch it. The real mistake is hiding it in the batter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yes — the sparkle is mineral, with a melting point near 3,000 degrees. Your oven can't touch it. The real mistake is hiding it in the batter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>can you bake edible glitter, edible glitter in the oven, heat stable edible glitter, baking with edible glitter, edible glitter for cookies, edible glitter for cupcakes, luster dust baking</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d9b20cc6/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter Uses: What Can You Actually Put It On?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter Uses: What Can You Actually Put It On?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cabe2481-4bfe-47e7-ba75-513511a33518</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/35f0df70</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What can you put edible glitter on? The label lists 5 uses — the honest answer is 2 questions.

The technical sheet names 5 homes for edible glitter: cake, candy, beverages, cocktails, and chocolate. The working rule is 2 questions — can you see it there, and will the surface hold it? Frosting, glaze, and melted chocolate grip the shimmer; clear drinks keep it swirling; dry cookies and opaque drinks waste it. In an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews, cake decoration is roughly half of all usage mentions, with holiday treats and cocktails covering most of the rest.

In this episode: the full application map with the numbers behind it — cakes, cupcakes, cookies, chocolate-covered strawberries, champagne, and a long tail that runs all the way to beer. Why glitter vanished on your buttercream, and the contrast trick that fixes it. Dana's bake-sale cookie disaster, and the one-step glaze fix that makes shimmer stay put. Plus the most beginner-proof starting point on the whole map (it isn't cake).

Who should skip it, honestly: households where every drink is opaque and every dessert is dark, anyone chasing crunch or flavor (buy sprinkles), and display-only projects nobody will eat.

The 12-color gift set mentioned at the end is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What can you put edible glitter on? The label lists 5 uses — the honest answer is 2 questions.

The technical sheet names 5 homes for edible glitter: cake, candy, beverages, cocktails, and chocolate. The working rule is 2 questions — can you see it there, and will the surface hold it? Frosting, glaze, and melted chocolate grip the shimmer; clear drinks keep it swirling; dry cookies and opaque drinks waste it. In an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews, cake decoration is roughly half of all usage mentions, with holiday treats and cocktails covering most of the rest.

In this episode: the full application map with the numbers behind it — cakes, cupcakes, cookies, chocolate-covered strawberries, champagne, and a long tail that runs all the way to beer. Why glitter vanished on your buttercream, and the contrast trick that fixes it. Dana's bake-sale cookie disaster, and the one-step glaze fix that makes shimmer stay put. Plus the most beginner-proof starting point on the whole map (it isn't cake).

Who should skip it, honestly: households where every drink is opaque and every dessert is dark, anyone chasing crunch or flavor (buy sprinkles), and display-only projects nobody will eat.

The 12-color gift set mentioned at the end is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/35f0df70/73debae9.mp3" length="8383287" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>523</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The label says 5 uses. The honest test is 2 questions — can you see it, and will it hold? A full map of what glitter belongs on, cake to champagne.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The label says 5 uses. The honest test is 2 questions — can you see it, and will it hold? A full map of what glitter belongs on, cake to champagne.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter uses, what can you put edible glitter on, edible glitter for cakes, edible glitter for drinks, edible glitter on cookies, edible glitter strawberries, edible glitter gift set</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/35f0df70/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Use Edible Glitter in Drinks, Step by Step</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How to Use Edible Glitter in Drinks, Step by Step</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6da9c659-6443-404b-8dd2-092beb6b08fc</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b43a9d75</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do you use edible glitter in drinks? Four easy steps — and one timing mistake that sinks almost every first try.

Pick a drink you can see through — see-through, not colorless, so red punch counts. Add a pinch per glass; the serving is 0.1 grams, and doubling it is optional drama. Give it one stir, or let carbonation do the stirring. Then serve it while it's still moving: glitter never dissolves, it rides the current, so the sparkle belongs at the handoff, not an hour before.

In this episode: the see-through test that tells you in five seconds whether any drink will sparkle; the pinch-and-pour method that makes the pour do the stirring; why punch bowls defeat glitter — and the glitter-the-cups trick that saves a party anyway; and the per-drink math (about 10 to 15 cents of glitter a glass) that makes doubling for a richer color a non-decision.

Skip it if your menu is opaque — cola, milk, hot cocoa — or if you're hoping it changes the taste: it's a flavorless shimmer, not a syrup.

The Iconic Gold 10-gram drink glitter mentioned in the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do you use edible glitter in drinks? Four easy steps — and one timing mistake that sinks almost every first try.

Pick a drink you can see through — see-through, not colorless, so red punch counts. Add a pinch per glass; the serving is 0.1 grams, and doubling it is optional drama. Give it one stir, or let carbonation do the stirring. Then serve it while it's still moving: glitter never dissolves, it rides the current, so the sparkle belongs at the handoff, not an hour before.

In this episode: the see-through test that tells you in five seconds whether any drink will sparkle; the pinch-and-pour method that makes the pour do the stirring; why punch bowls defeat glitter — and the glitter-the-cups trick that saves a party anyway; and the per-drink math (about 10 to 15 cents of glitter a glass) that makes doubling for a richer color a non-decision.

Skip it if your menu is opaque — cola, milk, hot cocoa — or if you're hoping it changes the taste: it's a flavorless shimmer, not a syrup.

The Iconic Gold 10-gram drink glitter mentioned in the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b43a9d75/a2ffe776.mp3" length="8591009" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>536</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A see-through drink, a pinch, one stir, served while it still moves. Glitter never dissolves — it rides the current, so timing is the whole trick.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A see-through drink, a pinch, one stir, served while it still moves. Glitter never dissolves — it rides the current, so timing is the whole trick.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how to use edible glitter in drinks, edible glitter for drinks, drink glitter, edible glitter for cocktails, glitter drinks, how much edible glitter per drink</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b43a9d75/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where to Buy Edible Glitter That Is Actually Edible</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Where to Buy Edible Glitter That Is Actually Edible</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f4eef65-d412-46c4-b971-8d49bcfc82f0</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4baf2598</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Where can you buy edible glitter that's actually edible? The store matters less than the label — here's the test.

Buy edible glitter wherever it is sold as food, not as a craft supply. Genuinely edible glitter carries the word "edible" on the label, a real ingredient list with named color additives, and — online — sits in the grocery category, next to frosting and icing. If a jar says "non-toxic" or "for decoration only," or lists no ingredients at all, it's decor, not dessert. Pass those checks and the store name barely matters.

In this episode: the three ten-second label checks that separate truly edible glitter from display-only shimmer; why "non-toxic" on a label never means food — and what to look for instead; the aisle trick — what a product's grocery category tells you before you read a single review; and what an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews shows about buyers who found out too late.

Who should skip it: if nobody is eating your project — a display cake, a photo shoot, craft night with the kids — you don't need edible glitter at all; cheaper craft glitter photographs the same.

The jar that passes every check: MONÉGASQUE Gold edible glitter, 15 g, on Amazon — about $15 at publish (check the listing for current pricing). For the official line on edible versus decorative glitter, see the FDA's consumer guidance on decorating foods with luster dust.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Where can you buy edible glitter that's actually edible? The store matters less than the label — here's the test.

Buy edible glitter wherever it is sold as food, not as a craft supply. Genuinely edible glitter carries the word "edible" on the label, a real ingredient list with named color additives, and — online — sits in the grocery category, next to frosting and icing. If a jar says "non-toxic" or "for decoration only," or lists no ingredients at all, it's decor, not dessert. Pass those checks and the store name barely matters.

In this episode: the three ten-second label checks that separate truly edible glitter from display-only shimmer; why "non-toxic" on a label never means food — and what to look for instead; the aisle trick — what a product's grocery category tells you before you read a single review; and what an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews shows about buyers who found out too late.

Who should skip it: if nobody is eating your project — a display cake, a photo shoot, craft night with the kids — you don't need edible glitter at all; cheaper craft glitter photographs the same.

The jar that passes every check: MONÉGASQUE Gold edible glitter, 15 g, on Amazon — about $15 at publish (check the listing for current pricing). For the official line on edible versus decorative glitter, see the FDA's consumer guidance on decorating foods with luster dust.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4baf2598/ef97dda1.mp3" length="4522596" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>282</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Where can you buy edible glitter that's actually edible? The store matters less than the label — here's the test.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Where can you buy edible glitter that's actually edible? The store matters less than the label — here's the test.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>where to buy edible glitter, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/4baf2598/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter and FDA Rules: What Approval Really Means</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter and FDA Rules: What Approval Really Means</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b40e693-3b7e-46be-a118-1f1d7e65749d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/73883931</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does the FDA approve edible glitter? No — and that's true for every brand. Here's what the rules actually cover.

The FDA doesn't approve edible glitter — or any everyday food product. Instead, it lists color additives with strict rules: mica-based pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350), iron oxides (73.200), and titanium dioxide (73.575), each with concentration caps. It also registers food facilities. Ingredients get listed, facilities get registered, products never get approved — so the honest phrasing is "made with FDA-listed color additives," and the real safety check is the ingredient list on the back of the jar.

In this episode: the three federal section numbers behind nearly every shimmer on the shelf, decoded in plain kitchen English — caps included. The 10-second aisle check: what an honest jar shows on the back, and the two label phrases that mean "not food." Why the FDA has investigated non-edible shimmer dust that ended up on real food — and how to keep it off your table. And Dana wins the round on real-world shopping: no federal reading required, just flip the jar.

Who should skip it: if nobody will eat your project — display cakes, ornaments, photo props — you don't need edible glitter at all. Craft glitter is cheaper and photographs the same; just keep it off the food.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color luster dust gift set is on Amazon — $49.99 at the time of publishing. For the color-additive rules themselves, see Title 21, Part 73 of the Code of Federal Regulations at ecfr.gov.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does the FDA approve edible glitter? No — and that's true for every brand. Here's what the rules actually cover.

The FDA doesn't approve edible glitter — or any everyday food product. Instead, it lists color additives with strict rules: mica-based pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350), iron oxides (73.200), and titanium dioxide (73.575), each with concentration caps. It also registers food facilities. Ingredients get listed, facilities get registered, products never get approved — so the honest phrasing is "made with FDA-listed color additives," and the real safety check is the ingredient list on the back of the jar.

In this episode: the three federal section numbers behind nearly every shimmer on the shelf, decoded in plain kitchen English — caps included. The 10-second aisle check: what an honest jar shows on the back, and the two label phrases that mean "not food." Why the FDA has investigated non-edible shimmer dust that ended up on real food — and how to keep it off your table. And Dana wins the round on real-world shopping: no federal reading required, just flip the jar.

Who should skip it: if nobody will eat your project — display cakes, ornaments, photo props — you don't need edible glitter at all. Craft glitter is cheaper and photographs the same; just keep it off the food.

The MONÉGASQUE 12-color luster dust gift set is on Amazon — $49.99 at the time of publishing. For the color-additive rules themselves, see Title 21, Part 73 of the Code of Federal Regulations at ecfr.gov.

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/73883931/2189fced.mp3" length="8381200" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>523</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Does the FDA approve edible glitter? No — and that's true for every brand. Here's what the rules actually cover.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Does the FDA approve edible glitter? No — and that's true for every brand. Here's what the rules actually cover.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter fda rules explained, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/73883931/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Does Edible Glitter Taste Like? A Flavor-Free Answer</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>What Does Edible Glitter Taste Like? A Flavor-Free Answer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d68998b3-eb4c-4fe1-8260-0717cea4fe52</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad9ac9d2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What does edible glitter taste like? Nothing at all — and "nothing" is exactly what you want on a birthday cupcake.

Edible glitter tastes like nothing — it's an odorless, flavorless mineral powder, not a sugar or a candy. It's almost insoluble in water, so it won't melt into frosting or steep into a drink; it just floats there and shines. It's heat-stable in the oven, and at a pinch — the drink guidance is 0.1 grams a glass — there's nothing to feel. Reviewers keep saying the same thing: no taste or smell.

In this episode: why a mineral can't flavor your frosting (the dissolve rule); what the safety sheet actually lists for smell; the pinch math that means there's no texture to notice; the surprising top taste complaint in an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews; and who should skip glitter entirely — if you want a topping that tastes like candy, buy sprinkles and be happy.

The 7-gram luster dust baking jars mentioned in the episode are on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What does edible glitter taste like? Nothing at all — and "nothing" is exactly what you want on a birthday cupcake.

Edible glitter tastes like nothing — it's an odorless, flavorless mineral powder, not a sugar or a candy. It's almost insoluble in water, so it won't melt into frosting or steep into a drink; it just floats there and shines. It's heat-stable in the oven, and at a pinch — the drink guidance is 0.1 grams a glass — there's nothing to feel. Reviewers keep saying the same thing: no taste or smell.

In this episode: why a mineral can't flavor your frosting (the dissolve rule); what the safety sheet actually lists for smell; the pinch math that means there's no texture to notice; the surprising top taste complaint in an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews; and who should skip glitter entirely — if you want a topping that tastes like candy, buy sprinkles and be happy.

The 7-gram luster dust baking jars mentioned in the episode are on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ad9ac9d2/c939dfb2.mp3" length="4570249" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>285</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does edible glitter taste like? Nothing at all — and "nothing" is exactly what you want on a birthday cupcake.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does edible glitter taste like? Nothing at all — and "nothing" is exactly what you want on a birthday cupcake.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>what does edible glitter taste like, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ad9ac9d2/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edible Glitter vs Luster Dust: Which One Do You Need?</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Edible Glitter vs Luster Dust: Which One Do You Need?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">519f6efb-192c-4c0b-8096-ea29d638abbb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b100bc26</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter or luster dust? Two gold jars, nearly the same price — and only one gives you sparkle in a glass.

Luster dust is an ultra-fine 5-to-25-micron powder that paints a smooth metallic sheen onto frosting, candy, and chocolate. Edible glitter is bigger flakes — 50 to 500 microns — that catch the light and stay visibly swirling in drinks. Same mineral family, different cut: dust paints, flakes sparkle. Judged per serving both cost dimes a glass, so buy for the job on your calendar and let one jar moonlight.

In this episode: the kitchen translation of particle size — powdered sugar versus sanding sugar — so you can pick the right jar in five seconds flat. Dana's price audit: $1.50 a gram versus a dollar, and why per-serving math flips that verdict. The round Dana wins outright: an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews shows half of "drink glitter" use is actually cake decorating — and what that means for your cart. Plus the one purchase that reliably disappoints (dust bought for drink sparkle) and how to avoid it.

Who should skip it: if everything you make is a frosted cake, you don't need the flakes; if you only want sparkling drinks, you don't need the dust; and if nobody's eating what you're decorating, skip both — craft glitter is made for display and costs less. It just never goes near food.

The jar from the episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15g Luster Dust on Amazon — $14.99 as of publish, roughly 150 servings per jar. More on the edible-vs-decorative distinction: the FDA's consumer guidance on decorative glitters and dusts (fda.gov).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Edible glitter or luster dust? Two gold jars, nearly the same price — and only one gives you sparkle in a glass.

Luster dust is an ultra-fine 5-to-25-micron powder that paints a smooth metallic sheen onto frosting, candy, and chocolate. Edible glitter is bigger flakes — 50 to 500 microns — that catch the light and stay visibly swirling in drinks. Same mineral family, different cut: dust paints, flakes sparkle. Judged per serving both cost dimes a glass, so buy for the job on your calendar and let one jar moonlight.

In this episode: the kitchen translation of particle size — powdered sugar versus sanding sugar — so you can pick the right jar in five seconds flat. Dana's price audit: $1.50 a gram versus a dollar, and why per-serving math flips that verdict. The round Dana wins outright: an analysis of about 2,400 category reviews shows half of "drink glitter" use is actually cake decorating — and what that means for your cart. Plus the one purchase that reliably disappoints (dust bought for drink sparkle) and how to avoid it.

Who should skip it: if everything you make is a frosted cake, you don't need the flakes; if you only want sparkling drinks, you don't need the dust; and if nobody's eating what you're decorating, skip both — craft glitter is made for display and costs less. It just never goes near food.

The jar from the episode: MONÉGASQUE Gold 15g Luster Dust on Amazon — $14.99 as of publish, roughly 150 servings per jar. More on the edible-vs-decorative distinction: the FDA's consumer guidance on decorative glitters and dusts (fda.gov).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b100bc26/f2727752.mp3" length="7693236" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>480</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Edible glitter or luster dust? Two gold jars, nearly the same price — and only one gives you sparkle in a glass.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Edible glitter or luster dust? Two gold jars, nearly the same price — and only one gives you sparkle in a glass.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter vs luster dust, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/b100bc26/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is Edible Glitter Made Of? The Full Ingredient List</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>What Is Edible Glitter Made Of? The Full Ingredient List</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16008609-6b94-448d-821b-21d638db72ec</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/db5dbb7e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is edible glitter actually made of? Mica — and the words next to it on the label matter more than the sparkle.

The real answer: edible glitter is built on mica-based pearlescent pigments listed in FDA color-additive regulations (21 CFR 73.350), colored with iron oxides and FD&amp;C colorants — the same additive families as commercial candy color. Craft glitter, by contrast, is cut plastic. Same shimmer in a photo; completely different object in your mouth.

In this episode: the mica story from mineral to jar; how to read a glitter ingredient list in under a minute; what "FDA-listed color additive" does and does not mean; why "non-toxic" is the most misleading word in the baking aisle; and the five-ingredient palette behind every color in the line.

Just want to know which color to buy? That's a different episode — this one is for label readers.

The jars discussed are on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is edible glitter actually made of? Mica — and the words next to it on the label matter more than the sparkle.

The real answer: edible glitter is built on mica-based pearlescent pigments listed in FDA color-additive regulations (21 CFR 73.350), colored with iron oxides and FD&amp;C colorants — the same additive families as commercial candy color. Craft glitter, by contrast, is cut plastic. Same shimmer in a photo; completely different object in your mouth.

In this episode: the mica story from mineral to jar; how to read a glitter ingredient list in under a minute; what "FDA-listed color additive" does and does not mean; why "non-toxic" is the most misleading word in the baking aisle; and the five-ingredient palette behind every color in the line.

Just want to know which color to buy? That's a different episode — this one is for label readers.

The jars discussed are on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/db5dbb7e/bef77c34.mp3" length="15496955" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>968</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is edible glitter actually made of? Mica — and the words next to it on the label matter more than the sparkle.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is edible glitter actually made of? Mica — and the words next to it on the label matter more than the sparkle.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>what is edible glitter made of, edible glitter, luster dust, cake decorating, drink glitter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/db5dbb7e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Much Edible Glitter Per Drink? The Pinch, Measured</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How Much Edible Glitter Per Drink? The Pinch, Measured</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6cc8ef86-abfb-4fa9-b792-f81df013e581</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2ba72bac</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter goes in one drink? Less than you think — and how you add it matters more than how much.

The listed serving is 0.1 grams per drink — a real pinch — and doubling it for a richer color still costs about twenty cents. A 15-gram jar pours roughly 150 drinks; a 10-gram jar about 100. Nobody weighs it: level the smallest spoon you own, start smaller than you think, and let bubbles or a swirl keep the shimmer moving.

In this episode: why your glitter "goes to sleep" at the bottom of the glass and the timing trick that fixes it; flakes vs fine dust — which swims and which paints; the tiny-spoon method bakers actually use; and when to skip glitter entirely (anything opaque — you'd be decorating for no one).

The Iconic Gold drink glitter mentioned in the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How much edible glitter goes in one drink? Less than you think — and how you add it matters more than how much.

The listed serving is 0.1 grams per drink — a real pinch — and doubling it for a richer color still costs about twenty cents. A 15-gram jar pours roughly 150 drinks; a 10-gram jar about 100. Nobody weighs it: level the smallest spoon you own, start smaller than you think, and let bubbles or a swirl keep the shimmer moving.

In this episode: why your glitter "goes to sleep" at the bottom of the glass and the timing trick that fixes it; flakes vs fine dust — which swims and which paints; the tiny-spoon method bakers actually use; and when to skip glitter entirely (anything opaque — you'd be decorating for no one).

The Iconic Gold drink glitter mentioned in the episode is on Amazon (check the listing for current pricing).

Produced with AI-crafted hosts. Full transcript on the episode page. New questions answered every week at The Monégasque Table.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2ba72bac/99091321.mp3" length="5524029" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>344</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A pinch, a spoon, or a scale? The real serving math — and the timing trick that keeps shimmer swirling to the last sip.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A pinch, a spoon, or a scale? The real serving math — and the timing trick that keeps shimmer swirling to the last sip.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>how much edible glitter,edible glitter for drinks,drink glitter,cocktail glitter,edible glitter champagne,luster dust</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2ba72bac/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Edible Glitter Worth It? What It Really Costs Per Drink and Per Cake</title>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Is Edible Glitter Worth It? What It Really Costs Per Drink and Per Cake</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67244372-13b8-417f-911d-a33efd26e60d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d2e23b28</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Is edible glitter worth the money? A 15-gram jar costs about fifteen dollars — steep next to craft-store glitter, until you do the per-serving math. In this episode, a budget-skeptical home baker and a numbers-minded co-host argue it out: the real price per gram across jar sizes, the ten-cents-a-drink serving math straight from the listing guidance, how the price compares with the category's typical five-gram bottles, and what the extra dollars actually buy — glitter genuinely made to be eaten, not display-only "non-toxic" dust (not the same thing). Plus: who should skip edible glitter entirely, and the surprising winner on cost per gram. By the end you'll be able to run the math yourself for any jar on the shelf.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Is edible glitter worth the money? A 15-gram jar costs about fifteen dollars — steep next to craft-store glitter, until you do the per-serving math. In this episode, a budget-skeptical home baker and a numbers-minded co-host argue it out: the real price per gram across jar sizes, the ten-cents-a-drink serving math straight from the listing guidance, how the price compares with the category's typical five-gram bottles, and what the extra dollars actually buy — glitter genuinely made to be eaten, not display-only "non-toxic" dust (not the same thing). Plus: who should skip edible glitter entirely, and the surprising winner on cost per gram. By the end you'll be able to run the math yourself for any jar on the shelf.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 06:35:39 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>MONÉGASQUE</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d2e23b28/906638ca.mp3" length="7228066" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>MONÉGASQUE</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>451</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is edible glitter worth the money? A 15-gram jar costs about fifteen dollars — steep next to craft-store glitter, until you do the per-serving math.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is edible glitter worth the money? A 15-gram jar costs about fifteen dollars — steep next to craft-store glitter, until you do the per-serving math.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>edible glitter,luster dust,edible glitter for drinks,cocktail glitter,cake decorating,edible glitter price</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/d2e23b28/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
