<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/gatehousechambers-legal-podcast" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/gatehousechambers-legal-podcast</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Each Gatehouse Chambers Podcast episode gives an informal view of important legal issues impacting individuals as well as companies and other legal entities. They will be of interest particularly to legal practitioners, law students and those interested in joining the legal profession and also the general public. The Gatehouse Chambers Podcast series concentrates on topics arising from Chambers' key practice areas which are: commercial dispute resolution (including not only litigation in court but also all forms of ADR such arbitration, adjudication, expert determination, mediation and early neutral evaluation. The topics range across banking and finance, civil fraud and asset tracing, employment and executive disputes, shareholder and partnership disputes, franchising, intellectual property and private international law.); construction and engineering (including arbitration, adjudication, property damage, construction insurance, energy and renewables as well as construction insolvency); insolvency and restructuring (including personal and corporate insolvency/bankruptcy and directors’ disqualification); insurance (including insurance coverage disputes, construction insurance, indemnity insurance and litigation insurance); private client (including trusts, TOLATA, contentious probate, Inheritance Act claims, community care, Court of Protection and social welfare and benefits); professional liability in the fields of personal injury and clinical negligence, financial professionals, insolvency professionals, directors and officers, legal professionals, property professionals and construction professionals; property (including commercial landlord and tenant, development, planning, social housing, private rented accommodation, leasehold and leasehold management, real property, mortgages and trusts of land).</description>
    <copyright>© Gatehouse Chambers 2026</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>5a971a37-f215-5d44-9d32-e2a86b300305</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 16:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 16:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://gatehouselaw.co.uk/</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Management"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/StBFoc5Gj10ADPzvVyUgXBTk0CtbUx-2atB9mX4mDJ8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzM2NTAvMTYyNjQy/NjYwMi1hcnR3b3Jr/LmpwZw.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Each Gatehouse Chambers Podcast episode gives an informal view of important legal issues impacting individuals as well as companies and other legal entities. They will be of interest particularly to legal practitioners, law students and those interested in joining the legal profession and also the general public. The Gatehouse Chambers Podcast series concentrates on topics arising from Chambers' key practice areas which are: commercial dispute resolution (including not only litigation in court but also all forms of ADR such arbitration, adjudication, expert determination, mediation and early neutral evaluation. The topics range across banking and finance, civil fraud and asset tracing, employment and executive disputes, shareholder and partnership disputes, franchising, intellectual property and private international law.); construction and engineering (including arbitration, adjudication, property damage, construction insurance, energy and renewables as well as construction insolvency); insolvency and restructuring (including personal and corporate insolvency/bankruptcy and directors’ disqualification); insurance (including insurance coverage disputes, construction insurance, indemnity insurance and litigation insurance); private client (including trusts, TOLATA, contentious probate, Inheritance Act claims, community care, Court of Protection and social welfare and benefits); professional liability in the fields of personal injury and clinical negligence, financial professionals, insolvency professionals, directors and officers, legal professionals, property professionals and construction professionals; property (including commercial landlord and tenant, development, planning, social housing, private rented accommodation, leasehold and leasehold management, real property, mortgages and trusts of land).</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Each Gatehouse Chambers Podcast episode gives an informal view of important legal issues impacting individuals as well as companies and other legal entities.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>ashley.allen@gatehouselaw.co.uk</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Property Newsletter Feb 2026 Introduction</title>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>42</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Property Newsletter Feb 2026 Introduction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f8942f0-6cbb-464f-97bd-20a147ccf3cb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/906dd245</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/906dd245/1d526a72.mp3" length="2140532" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>88</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dwelling in the past?</title>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>41</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Dwelling in the past?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89c8648e-0b39-4b2f-ad8f-73fe0b8023b9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ee782f3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6ee782f3/6c502b51.mp3" length="10626114" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>442</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6ee782f3/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Signed, unsealed, undelivered? When is a claim ‘made’ under s.29A of the 1954 Act?</title>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>40</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Signed, unsealed, undelivered? When is a claim ‘made’ under s.29A of the 1954 Act?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca7b0c2f-588c-41a8-820e-a6aa3762eca4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5ac37e9d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5ac37e9d/ac1ac7e6.mp3" length="12651062" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>526</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5ac37e9d/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Property Newsletter February 2026 Full Version</title>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>39</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Property Newsletter February 2026 Full Version</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbf94899-2740-4abc-a12e-998a1b211718</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/17168721</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/17168721/5f2b38ee.mp3" length="24536543" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1021</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Winter Property Newsletter - Full Version</title>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>38</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Winter Property Newsletter - Full Version</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">022ede86-776a-4a23-afc8-72f8eb9745ed</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c31c12a2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David Peachey</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c31c12a2/d3324e63.mp3" length="27553747" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>David Peachey</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1147</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Planning permissions and restrictive covenants: Settion 84 and the decision in Hassan v Heath</title>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>37</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Planning permissions and restrictive covenants: Settion 84 and the decision in Hassan v Heath</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6ca3404-ea23-474d-a759-84805d8f923a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6771d1da</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 10:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Victoria Dacie-Lombardo</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6771d1da/15339c5c.mp3" length="13052454" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Victoria Dacie-Lombardo</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>543</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6771d1da/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Equity’s Escape Hatch – can Proprietary Estoppel outflank s2 LP(MP)A 1989?</title>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>36</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Equity’s Escape Hatch – can Proprietary Estoppel outflank s2 LP(MP)A 1989?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b86113a7-6ea2-4f2e-9e83-93c2b891960e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/009220f4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 10:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Cameron Stocks</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/009220f4/a069545f.mp3" length="11663757" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Cameron Stocks</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>485</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/009220f4/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Winter Property Newsletter 2025 - Introduction</title>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>35</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Winter Property Newsletter 2025 - Introduction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f3e6452-d873-420b-a71e-fc85e15a3e26</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b76c898f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 10:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David Peachey</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b76c898f/88cfc8e8.mp3" length="1617625" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>David Peachey</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>66</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.</em></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Women's Day 2022: Sarah Clarke interviews Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers</title>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>34</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>International Women's Day 2022: Sarah Clarke interviews Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">586c225c-009b-4e6e-b629-238494f012eb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/cfa4c1f4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[International Women's Day 2022: Sarah Clarke interviews Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[International Women's Day 2022: Sarah Clarke interviews Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/cfa4c1f4/3a279728.mp3" length="46392101" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1931</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International Women's Day 2022: Sarah Clarke interviews Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International Women's Day 2022: Sarah Clarke interviews Marcia Shekerdemian QC of Wilberforce Chambers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LGBTQIA+ History Month: ICC Judge Sally Barber</title>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>33</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LGBTQIA+ History Month: ICC Judge Sally Barber</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75f81441-c232-4c7f-80e7-ddb0edf5fb92</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a24bcc29</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In our final podcast for LGBTQIA+ History Month, Sarah Clarke and Zoe Mellor interview ICC Judge Sally Barber.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In our final podcast for LGBTQIA+ History Month, Sarah Clarke and Zoe Mellor interview ICC Judge Sally Barber.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 09:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a24bcc29/8501b9d6.mp3" length="25113511" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1044</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In our final podcast for LGBTQIA+ History Month, Sarah Clarke and Zoe Mellor interview ICC Judge Sally Barber.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In our final podcast for LGBTQIA+ History Month, Sarah Clarke and Zoe Mellor interview ICC Judge Sally Barber.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LGBTQIA+ History Month: Dr S Chelvan, 33 Bedford Row</title>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>31</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LGBTQIA+ History Month: Dr S Chelvan, 33 Bedford Row</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66250765-3466-403e-bd49-a18f05d0bfaf</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2d4e502e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cameron Stocks interviews Dr S Chelvan for the second podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Cameron Stocks interviews Dr S Chelvan for the second podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2d4e502e/8a65d177.mp3" length="31894076" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1327</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Cameron Stocks interviews Dr S Chelvan for the second podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cameron Stocks interviews Dr S Chelvan for the second podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LGBTQIA+ History Month: Dr Victoria McCloud, Master of the Senior Courts, Queen’s Bench Division</title>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>30</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LGBTQIA+ History Month: Dr Victoria McCloud, Master of the Senior Courts, Queen’s Bench Division</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">433e7e86-0c54-418f-8f2a-839bc6301816</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/80b1049b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and James Hall interview Master McCloud for the first podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and James Hall interview Master McCloud for the first podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/80b1049b/afa90e3e.mp3" length="29910567" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1244</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and James Hall interview Master McCloud for the first podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and James Hall interview Master McCloud for the first podcast in our series for LGBTQIA+ History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black History Month - #ProudToBe Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Anitha Bushiri</title>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>29</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Black History Month - #ProudToBe Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Anitha Bushiri</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e33ef13-f751-47a1-8162-16ba6adf2cbb</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8a25db62</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Morayo and Fagborun and Anitha Bushiri conclude our #ProudToBe series for Black History Month.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Morayo and Fagborun and Anitha Bushiri conclude our #ProudToBe series for Black History Month.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:50:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8a25db62/a8055c77.mp3" length="27983882" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1164</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Morayo and Fagborun and Anitha Bushiri conclude our #ProudToBe series for Black History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Morayo and Fagborun and Anitha Bushiri conclude our #ProudToBe series for Black History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black History Month - #ProudToBe Sally Penni MBE</title>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>28</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Black History Month - #ProudToBe Sally Penni MBE</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24b8b5ef-90e5-40dc-ae29-c280a80eacf7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0ad53895</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Anitha Bushiri speak to Sally Penni MBE for the fourth episode in our “Proud to Be” series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Anitha Bushiri speak to Sally Penni MBE for the fourth episode in our “Proud to Be” series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:29:44 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0ad53895/38018a02.mp3" length="20910074" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>869</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Anitha Bushiri speak to Sally Penni MBE for the fourth episode in our “Proud to Be” series for Black History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Anitha Bushiri speak to Sally Penni MBE for the fourth episode in our “Proud to Be” series for Black History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black History Month - "Proud to Be" Andrew Powell</title>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>27</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Black History Month - "Proud to Be" Andrew Powell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56802772-9a94-46cd-a6d0-548b76de9d24</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/25dbb20b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shazia Akhtar and Patrick Sarson interview Andrew Powell for the third episode in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shazia Akhtar and Patrick Sarson interview Andrew Powell for the third episode in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:25:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/25dbb20b/3684d992.mp3" length="47080032" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1959</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shazia Akhtar and Patrick Sarson interview Andrew Powell for the third episode in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shazia Akhtar and Patrick Sarson interview Andrew Powell for the third episode in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black History Month: "Proud to Be" an Ally</title>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>26</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Black History Month: "Proud to Be" an Ally</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">048dee6e-82c3-4872-88d6-6f06ffba5e65</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/bbe93986</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Emily Betts and Bryan Frimpong interview James Hall for the second podcast in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Emily Betts and Bryan Frimpong interview James Hall for the second podcast in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:32:31 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/bbe93986/3595d9db.mp3" length="35154020" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1462</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Emily Betts and Bryan Frimpong interview James Hall for the second podcast in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Emily Betts and Bryan Frimpong interview James Hall for the second podcast in our "Proud to Be" series for Black History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expert reports that fall short: the tactical trap in Griffiths v TUI and how to avoid it</title>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>25</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Expert reports that fall short: the tactical trap in Griffiths v TUI and how to avoid it</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45432d8b-2ddf-4010-a01f-a6dfb752a6ee</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b88ed0f2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Colm Nugent and Vanessa McKinlay discuss the implications of the decision in Griffiths v TUI (UK) Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 1442.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Colm Nugent and Vanessa McKinlay discuss the implications of the decision in Griffiths v TUI (UK) Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 1442.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:06:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b88ed0f2/55e7aa6f.mp3" length="42000444" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1748</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Colm Nugent and Vanessa McKinlay discuss the implications of the decision in Griffiths v TUI (UK) Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 1442.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Colm Nugent and Vanessa McKinlay discuss the implications of the decision in Griffiths v TUI (UK) Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 1442.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black History Month: "Proud to Be" Gemma de Cordova and Shey Ojedokun</title>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>24</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Black History Month: "Proud to Be" Gemma de Cordova and Shey Ojedokun</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1cba449-30c2-4699-95cd-61e3a3f4d65d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/865109ba</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Faisel Sadiq speaks to Gemma de Cordova and Shey Ojedokun for the first episode of our "Proud to Be" podcast series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Faisel Sadiq speaks to Gemma de Cordova and Shey Ojedokun for the first episode of our "Proud to Be" podcast series for Black History Month.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:34:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/865109ba/75e4c554.mp3" length="28068980" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1167</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Faisel Sadiq speaks to Gemma de Cordova and Shey Ojedokun for the first episode in our "Proud to Be" podcast series for Black History Month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Faisel Sadiq speaks to Gemma de Cordova and Shey Ojedokun for the first episode in our "Proud to Be" podcast series for Black History Month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Black History Month</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insider’s guide to applying for pupillage and being a pupil at Gatehouse Chambers</title>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>23</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Insider’s guide to applying for pupillage and being a pupil at Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07cdea11-6a42-4575-bf03-d121e2c03314</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b456f907</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Priya Gopal interviews William Golightly and Jaysen Sharpe.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Priya Gopal interviews William Golightly and Jaysen Sharpe.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:42:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b456f907/55cd0c60.mp3" length="15095437" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>627</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Priya Gopal interviews William Golightly and Jaysen Sharpe.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Priya Gopal interviews William Golightly and Jaysen Sharpe.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adjudication update</title>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Adjudication update</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13bb3a07-67cf-487b-aeac-0e9b995d506d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/80f3bf30</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Simon Kerry and George Eyre provide an update on recent case law relating to adjudication, covering hybrid contracts, costs and liquidated damages.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Simon Kerry and George Eyre provide an update on recent case law relating to adjudication, covering hybrid contracts, costs and liquidated damages.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/80f3bf30/9ccfea29.mp3" length="64106037" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2669</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Simon Kerry and George Eyre provide an update on recent case law relating to adjudication.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Simon Kerry and George Eyre provide an update on recent case law relating to adjudication.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aggregation in Solicitors' Professional Indemnity Insurance</title>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Aggregation in Solicitors' Professional Indemnity Insurance</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">822b9c5e-11d6-4ab1-83e3-0214dbac74de</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5ded05cb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[John de Waal QC and James Hall discuss the thorny issue of aggregation in solicitors' professional indemnity insurance, with particular reference to the case of AIG Europe Limited v Woodman and the recent case of Baines v Dixon Coles and Gill.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[John de Waal QC and James Hall discuss the thorny issue of aggregation in solicitors' professional indemnity insurance, with particular reference to the case of AIG Europe Limited v Woodman and the recent case of Baines v Dixon Coles and Gill.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:43:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5ded05cb/8c432cc4.mp3" length="41929996" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1744</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>John de Waal QC and James Hall discuss the thorny issue of aggregation in solicitors' professional indemnity insurance, with particular reference to the case of AIG Europe Limited v Woodman and the recent case of Baines v Dixon Coles and Gill.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>John de Waal QC and James Hall discuss the thorny issue of aggregation in solicitors' professional indemnity insurance, with particular reference to the case of AIG Europe Limited v Woodman and the recent case of Baines v Dixon Coles and Gill.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clinical Negligence Review 2020 - 2021</title>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>20</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Clinical Negligence Review 2020 - 2021</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a7f5167-73e1-418e-8eed-f54b147338dd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/73778917</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Aneurin Moloney and Helena Drage review a selection of the most significant decisions in the field of Clinical Negligence in 2020 and take a look at the hot topics for 2021.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Aneurin Moloney and Helena Drage review a selection of the most significant decisions in the field of Clinical Negligence in 2020 and take a look at the hot topics for 2021.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:10:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/73778917/043cf4c6.mp3" length="51971441" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2162</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Aneurin Moloney and Helena Drage review a selection of the most significant decisions in the field of Clinical Negligence in 2020 and take a look at the hot topics for 2021.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Aneurin Moloney and Helena Drage review a selection of the most significant decisions in the field of Clinical Negligence in 2020 and take a look at the hot topics for 2021.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Liability of Experts for Wasted Costs</title>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title> Liability of Experts for Wasted Costs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e81a31c-007e-4006-babc-38aa1ce52561</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/157bc8ed</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Cases covered: </p><ul><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/4650/AC5009967"><strong>Rubiera v Job</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/736/AC0154635"><strong>Topham v Ageas &amp; Kerali</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/120/AC0149348"><strong>Kennedy v Corida Services LLP</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Documents/AC0100290"><strong>Phillips v Symes</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/159/AC0149080"><strong>Deutsche Bank AG v (1) Sebastian Holdings Inc (2) Alexander Vik </strong>(</a>Defendant for costs purposes only) </li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/FullText/AC5006325FamDiv.pdf"><strong>Parent A v Parent B &amp; 5 Ors</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Documents/AC1605244"><strong>Symphony Group Plc v Hodgson</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Documents/AC1744072"><strong>Bahai v Rashidian (1985)</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/3416/AC5006332"><strong>LVI v Zafar and Others</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/324/AC5010368"><strong>Samantha Thimmaya (Claimant) v Lancashire NHS Foundation Trust (Defendant) &amp; Firas Jamil (Third Partys Costs) (2020)</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/352/AC1912456"><strong>Mainwaring v Goldtech Investments Limited</strong></a></li></ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Cases covered: </p><ul><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/4650/AC5009967"><strong>Rubiera v Job</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/736/AC0154635"><strong>Topham v Ageas &amp; Kerali</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/120/AC0149348"><strong>Kennedy v Corida Services LLP</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Documents/AC0100290"><strong>Phillips v Symes</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/159/AC0149080"><strong>Deutsche Bank AG v (1) Sebastian Holdings Inc (2) Alexander Vik </strong>(</a>Defendant for costs purposes only) </li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/FullText/AC5006325FamDiv.pdf"><strong>Parent A v Parent B &amp; 5 Ors</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Documents/AC1605244"><strong>Symphony Group Plc v Hodgson</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Documents/AC1744072"><strong>Bahai v Rashidian (1985)</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/3416/AC5006332"><strong>LVI v Zafar and Others</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/324/AC5010368"><strong>Samantha Thimmaya (Claimant) v Lancashire NHS Foundation Trust (Defendant) &amp; Firas Jamil (Third Partys Costs) (2020)</strong></a></li><li><a href="https://www.lawtel.com/UK/Searches/352/AC1912456"><strong>Mainwaring v Goldtech Investments Limited</strong></a></li></ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/157bc8ed/f668c14f.mp3" length="44807308" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1863</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Feautring Colm Nugent and Aneurin Moloney.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Feautring Colm Nugent and Aneurin Moloney.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hardwicke Celebrates International Women's Day 2021 with Sally Penni MBE, Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Amanda Illing</title>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Hardwicke Celebrates International Women's Day 2021 with Sally Penni MBE, Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Amanda Illing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51f2131a-0d40-416e-bd7c-49fe7f1369c5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3021625c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In conversation with Sally Penni MBE, Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Amanda Illing.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In conversation with Sally Penni MBE, Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Amanda Illing.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3021625c/2300169f.mp3" length="71822331" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2989</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In conversation with Sally Penni MBE, Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Amanda Illing.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In conversation with Sally Penni MBE, Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Morayo Fagborun Bennett and Amanda Illing.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hardwicke's review of the ten leading property cases from 2020</title>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Hardwicke's review of the ten leading property cases from 2020</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5369108-485d-41eb-b31e-3019a47f6609</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/63bad0d2</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland) </strong>[2020] UKSC 36<br><strong>Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 104<br><strong>Beaumont Business Centres Limited v Florala Properties Limited </strong>[2020] EWHC 550<br><strong>Capitol Park Leeds plc v Global Radio Services Limited </strong>[2020] EWHC 2750 (Ch)<br><strong>Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Limited v University of the Arts London </strong>[2020] UKUT 0248 (LC)</p><p><strong>Southwark LBC v Ludgate House Limited</strong> [2020] EWCA Civ 1637<br><strong>Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd </strong>[2020] UKSC 45<br><strong>Trecarrel House Limited v Rouncefield </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 760<br><strong>Rees v Windsor Clive </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 816<br><strong>89 Holland Park Management Ltd v Hicks </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 758</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland) </strong>[2020] UKSC 36<br><strong>Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 104<br><strong>Beaumont Business Centres Limited v Florala Properties Limited </strong>[2020] EWHC 550<br><strong>Capitol Park Leeds plc v Global Radio Services Limited </strong>[2020] EWHC 2750 (Ch)<br><strong>Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Limited v University of the Arts London </strong>[2020] UKUT 0248 (LC)</p><p><strong>Southwark LBC v Ludgate House Limited</strong> [2020] EWCA Civ 1637<br><strong>Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd </strong>[2020] UKSC 45<br><strong>Trecarrel House Limited v Rouncefield </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 760<br><strong>Rees v Windsor Clive </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 816<br><strong>89 Holland Park Management Ltd v Hicks </strong>[2020] EWCA Civ 758</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/63bad0d2/d4f439a7.mp3" length="64340681" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2677</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A review of the ten leading property cases from 2020. Featuring John de Waal QC, Faisel Sadiq and Katrina Mather.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A review of the ten leading property cases from 2020. Featuring John de Waal QC, Faisel Sadiq and Katrina Mather.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Property lawyers – take note of Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd regarding judicial evaluation of uncontroverted expert evidence</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Property lawyers – take note of Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd regarding judicial evaluation of uncontroverted expert evidence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">092dfe0b-1699-4a80-9d90-7d2f85592d02</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/93983119</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The High Court appeal in Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 handed down in August 2020 has been much remarked on by personal injury lawyers, but the decision is also of interest for cases in the business and property courts. Andy Creer and Emily Betts provide an overview.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The High Court appeal in Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 handed down in August 2020 has been much remarked on by personal injury lawyers, but the decision is also of interest for cases in the business and property courts. Andy Creer and Emily Betts provide an overview.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/93983119/324c7952.mp3" length="10207678" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>634</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The High Court appeal in Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 handed down in August 2020 has been much remarked on by personal injury lawyers, but the decision is also of interest for cases in the business and property courts. Andy Creer and Emily Betts provide an overview.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The High Court appeal in Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 handed down in August 2020 has been much remarked on by personal injury lawyers, but the decision is also of interest for cases in the business and property courts. Andy Creer and Emily Bett</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insider’s guide to applying for pupillage and being a pupil at Hardwicke</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Insider’s guide to applying for pupillage and being a pupil at Hardwicke</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b831d04-7d4f-4b09-854b-e947e344b824</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/cee6af93</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Priya Gopal interviews Michael Maris and Rob Hammond who recently completed their pupillage at Hardwicke.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Priya Gopal interviews Michael Maris and Rob Hammond who recently completed their pupillage at Hardwicke.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/cee6af93/c87abb9f.mp3" length="17115055" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>710</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Priya Gopal interviews Michael Maris and Rob Hammond who recently completed their pupillage at Hardwicke.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Priya Gopal interviews Michael Maris and Rob Hammond who recently completed their pupillage at Hardwicke.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To: the Office Assistant applications</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>How To: the Office Assistant applications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e09ae963-d570-4f5e-8f6c-c5c399d07e3e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ab41cec8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Amanda Illing and Linda McGivern explain the process behind hiring an Office Assistant and how to apply via our website. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Amanda Illing and Linda McGivern explain the process behind hiring an Office Assistant and how to apply via our website. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ab41cec8/738578fc.mp3" length="8052591" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>570</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Amanda Illing and Linda McGivern explain the process behind hiring an Office Assistant and how to apply via our website. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amanda Illing and Linda McGivern explain the process behind hiring an Office Assistant and how to apply via our website. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proportionality: Where are we now?</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Proportionality: Where are we now?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9470ad2c-31d2-4bfc-a9ad-63b2011cb26a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d11f14cf</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Martyn Griffiths considers the scope of and approach to the proportionality test in costs assessments in the light of two significant decisions. He addresses what the guidance in those authorities means for costs practitioners and litigators more generally, and considers the scope for future developments in this area]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Martyn Griffiths considers the scope of and approach to the proportionality test in costs assessments in the light of two significant decisions. He addresses what the guidance in those authorities means for costs practitioners and litigators more generally, and considers the scope for future developments in this area]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d11f14cf/06c3920d.mp3" length="19525105" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1216</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Martyn Griffiths considers the scope of and approach to the proportionality test in costs assessments in the light of two significant decisions. He addresses what the guidance in those authorities means for costs practitioners and litigators more generally, and considers the scope for future developments in this area</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Martyn Griffiths considers the scope of and approach to the proportionality test in costs assessments in the light of two significant decisions. He addresses what the guidance in those authorities means for costs practitioners and litigators more generall</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LGBTQ+ History Month</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>LGBTQ+ History Month</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c84023f5-8693-47ff-affa-90dbc8e95aa7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2721abf1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hardwicke barristers Brie Stevens-Hoare, Carl Brewin, Emma Hynes and Cameron Stock all discuss LGBT+ History and the effect it has had on them. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Hardwicke barristers Brie Stevens-Hoare, Carl Brewin, Emma Hynes and Cameron Stock all discuss LGBT+ History and the effect it has had on them. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2721abf1/623a3d61.mp3" length="21866299" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1352</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hardwicke barristers Brie Stevens-Hoare, Carl Brewin, Emma Hynes and Cameron Stock all discuss LGBT+ History and the effect it has had on them. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hardwicke barristers Brie Stevens-Hoare, Carl Brewin, Emma Hynes and Cameron Stock all discuss LGBT+ History and the effect it has had on them. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brushett v Hazeldean - A Summary </title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Brushett v Hazeldean - A Summary </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cd4a417d-d84e-4481-9d23-48b9e0e629e4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/dd1c7438</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Brushett v Hazeldean </em>(2019) </p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Brushett v Hazeldean </em>(2019) </p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/dd1c7438/b86ba2b1.mp3" length="12784495" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>795</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Colm Nugent and Aneurin Moloney summarise the interesting case of Brushett v Hazeldean. The case has been widely reported in the media and described by The Times as ‘the case that divided a nation’. Aneurin Moloney acted for the claimant, Gemma Brushett, who was knocked over and injured by a cyclist, Robert Hazeldean, as she crossed a road looking at her mobile phone. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Colm Nugent and Aneurin Moloney summarise the interesting case of Brushett v Hazeldean. The case has been widely reported in the media and described by The Times as ‘the case that divided a nation’. Aneurin Moloney acted for the claimant, Gemma Brushett, </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Hardwicke, Personal Injury, Cyclists, Road Traffic Accident,</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Costs: the 2019 trends</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Costs: the 2019 trends</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">730f54df-c999-41cd-abc1-0d6932e0a859</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7c7deb1f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Costs specialists PJ Kirby QC and Robin Dunne look back at some important cases of 2019 and consider what issues will arise in the world of costs in 2020</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Costs specialists PJ Kirby QC and Robin Dunne look back at some important cases of 2019 and consider what issues will arise in the world of costs in 2020</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7c7deb1f/a8bf6d4a.mp3" length="27647452" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1502</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Costs specialists PJ Kirby QC and Robin Dunne look back at some important cases of 2019 and consider what issues will arise in the world of costs in 2020</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Costs specialists PJ Kirby QC and Robin Dunne look back at some important cases of 2019 and consider what issues will arise in the world of costs in 2020</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Up High and Down Low: ownership of airspace and subsoil</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Up High and Down Low: ownership of airspace and subsoil</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12f7e976-dad3-434d-8119-4d9a8ab7266c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/432f3f77</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A podcast in which Daniel Gatty and Priya Gopal discuss the law regarding freehold and leasehold ownership of airspace above and subsoil below land and buildings.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A podcast in which Daniel Gatty and Priya Gopal discuss the law regarding freehold and leasehold ownership of airspace above and subsoil below land and buildings.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/432f3f77/464ff76e.mp3" length="19480419" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1276</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A podcast in which Daniel Gatty and Priya Gopal discuss the law regarding freehold and leasehold ownership of airspace above and subsoil below land and buildings.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A podcast in which Daniel Gatty and Priya Gopal discuss the law regarding freehold and leasehold ownership of airspace above and subsoil below land and buildings.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Gatehouse Chambers, chambers, law, legal, lawyers, barrister, london, Gray's Inn</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Third six pupils Interview </title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Third six pupils Interview </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">352ab14f-9e2c-402b-b1c7-ca51f2882784</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/02fb4223</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our third six pupils about how their first few weeks in chambers has been, what training they have received and their recent work including court appearances.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our third six pupils about how their first few weeks in chambers has been, what training they have received and their recent work including court appearances.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/02fb4223/73bcd6b6.mp3" length="3215288" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>197</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our third six pupils about how their first few weeks in chambers has been, what training they have received and their recent work including court appearances.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our third six pupils about how their first few weeks in chambers has been, what training they have received and their recent work including court appearances.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Hardwicke third-six pupils </itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pupils interviews</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Pupils interviews</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b76f1c0-7d4b-4efd-9756-3e131b95432d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/93af92a9</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our twelve month pupils, Rob and Michael, about how they have found their first few weeks in chambers, the type of work they have undertaken, and whether it has lived up to their expectations!]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our twelve month pupils, Rob and Michael, about how they have found their first few weeks in chambers, the type of work they have undertaken, and whether it has lived up to their expectations!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/93af92a9/b12ae8cc.mp3" length="4460460" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>274</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our twelve month pupils, Rob and Michael, about how they have found their first few weeks in chambers, the type of work they have undertaken, and whether it has lived up to their expectations!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this podcast Katrina Mather speaks to our twelve month pupils, Rob and Michael, about how they have found their first few weeks in chambers, the type of work they have undertaken, and whether it has lived up to their expectations!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Hardwicke pupillage </itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Covert recording of expert medical examinations</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Covert recording of expert medical examinations</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cb450451-686c-4917-a257-ea9af050ba8f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c02360ec</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Case citations: <br><em>Mustard v Flowers &amp; Ors</em> [2019] EWHC 2623 (QB)</p><p><em>Jones v Warwick University</em> [2003] EWCA Civ 151</p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Case citations: <br><em>Mustard v Flowers &amp; Ors</em> [2019] EWHC 2623 (QB)</p><p><em>Jones v Warwick University</em> [2003] EWCA Civ 151</p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke </author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c02360ec/fffe466e.mp3" length="17199214" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1070</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Charles Bagot QC and Colm Nugent discuss the covert recording of expert medical examinations.  Now that this issue has been confronted head-on by the courts - is it something that can be prevented – and, if not, shouldn’t it just be accepted and regulated?  

Charles and Colm examine the pros and cons of this developing topic.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Charles Bagot QC and Colm Nugent discuss the covert recording of expert medical examinations.  Now that this issue has been confronted head-on by the courts - is it something that can be prevented – and, if not, shouldn’t it just be accepted and regulated</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Hardwicke, chambes, legal, law, clinical neg, medical examinations, recording, expert medical examinations, covert recording, ethics</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recent Changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service </title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Recent Changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a16420a4-e162-4047-a8f9-beb0582cc3b5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7f84e28d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On 1 April 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enacted new rules that substantially expanded the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Whereas previously it was limited to awarding complainants redress of £150k, that figure is now £350k. In addition, the categories of eligible complainant will now include not only individuals and ‘micro enterprises’ but also SMEs (small to medium enterprises) whose turnover is below £6.5m and who have either less than 50 employees or a balance sheet total of less than £5m.

This podcast by James Hall and Tom Bell covers: 

• an explanation of the new rules,
• the practical impact of the changes,
• areas of contention,
• recent developments in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).

By listening to this podcast, you will gain:

• an understanding of the FOS’s new jurisdiction,
• an appreciation of the new rules’ practical significance and impact on your clients.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On 1 April 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enacted new rules that substantially expanded the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Whereas previously it was limited to awarding complainants redress of £150k, that figure is now £350k. In addition, the categories of eligible complainant will now include not only individuals and ‘micro enterprises’ but also SMEs (small to medium enterprises) whose turnover is below £6.5m and who have either less than 50 employees or a balance sheet total of less than £5m.

This podcast by James Hall and Tom Bell covers: 

• an explanation of the new rules,
• the practical impact of the changes,
• areas of contention,
• recent developments in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).

By listening to this podcast, you will gain:

• an understanding of the FOS’s new jurisdiction,
• an appreciation of the new rules’ practical significance and impact on your clients.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke </author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7f84e28d/3e02efba.mp3" length="33603815" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2096</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On 1 April 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enacted new rules that substantially expanded the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Whereas previously it was limited to awarding complainants redress of £150k, that figure is now £350k. In addition, the categories of eligible complainant will now include not only individuals and ‘micro enterprises’ but also SMEs (small to medium enterprises) whose turnover is below £6.5m and who have either less than 50 employees or a balance sheet total of less than £5m.

This podcast by James Hall and Tom Bell covers: 

• an explanation of the new rules,
• the practical impact of the changes,
• areas of contention,
• recent developments in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).

By listening to this podcast, you will gain:

• an understanding of the FOS’s new jurisdiction,
• an appreciation of the new rules’ practical significance and impact on your clients.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On 1 April 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enacted new rules that substantially expanded the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Whereas previously it was limited to awarding complainants redress of £150k, that figure is now</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Ombudsman Service, </itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adjudication of construction professional negligence claims </title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Adjudication of construction professional negligence claims </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2293e136-a26a-4f31-a960-0d1593106c71</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/015a0296</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Statutory provision </strong></p><p> </p><p>·       The Latham Report (1994)</p><p>·       Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 – s104, 105 and 108</p><p> </p><p><strong>Case citations</strong></p><p> </p><p>·       <em>AWG Construction Services Ltd v Rockingham Motor Speedway Limited</em> [2004] EWHC 888 (TCC)</p><p>·       <em>CIB Properties Ltd v Birse Construction Ltd</em> [2004] EWHC 2365 (TCC)</p><p>·       <em>Pantelli Associates Ltd v Corporate City Development</em> [2010] EWHC 3189 (TCC)</p><p>·       <em>ACD (Landscape Architects) Ltd v Overall</em> [2012] EWHC 100 (TCC) [2012] EWHC 100 (TCC) </p><p>·       <em>Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee</em> [1957] 1 WLR 582</p><p>·       <em>BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland</em> [2017] UKSC 21</p><p>·       <em>South Australia Asset Management Corpn v York Montague Ltd</em> [1997] AC 191</p><p>·       <em>Russell v Stone (t/a PSP Consultants)</em> [2019] EWHC 831 (TCC)</p><p> </p><p><strong>Professional Negligence Bar Association Adjudication Scheme </strong></p><p> </p><p>·       <a href="https://pnba.co.uk/pnba-adjudication-scheme">https://pnba.co.uk/pnba-adjudication-scheme</a>)</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Statutory provision </strong></p><p> </p><p>·       The Latham Report (1994)</p><p>·       Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 – s104, 105 and 108</p><p> </p><p><strong>Case citations</strong></p><p> </p><p>·       <em>AWG Construction Services Ltd v Rockingham Motor Speedway Limited</em> [2004] EWHC 888 (TCC)</p><p>·       <em>CIB Properties Ltd v Birse Construction Ltd</em> [2004] EWHC 2365 (TCC)</p><p>·       <em>Pantelli Associates Ltd v Corporate City Development</em> [2010] EWHC 3189 (TCC)</p><p>·       <em>ACD (Landscape Architects) Ltd v Overall</em> [2012] EWHC 100 (TCC) [2012] EWHC 100 (TCC) </p><p>·       <em>Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee</em> [1957] 1 WLR 582</p><p>·       <em>BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland</em> [2017] UKSC 21</p><p>·       <em>South Australia Asset Management Corpn v York Montague Ltd</em> [1997] AC 191</p><p>·       <em>Russell v Stone (t/a PSP Consultants)</em> [2019] EWHC 831 (TCC)</p><p> </p><p><strong>Professional Negligence Bar Association Adjudication Scheme </strong></p><p> </p><p>·       <a href="https://pnba.co.uk/pnba-adjudication-scheme">https://pnba.co.uk/pnba-adjudication-scheme</a>)</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/015a0296/eea54d1d.mp3" length="21107177" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1315</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ebony Alleyne and Sarah McCann explore the pros and cons of using statutory adjudication as a means of resolving such disputes and then consider the role and potential impact of the new Professional Negligence Bar Association’s adjudication scheme.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ebony Alleyne and Sarah McCann explore the pros and cons of using statutory adjudication as a means of resolving such disputes and then consider the role and potential impact of the new Professional Negligence Bar Association’s adjudication scheme.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Construction, Professional Negligence, </itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Summary of Recent Corporate Insolvency Cases</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>A Summary of Recent Corporate Insolvency Cases</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09b5757b-c3f5-485b-9e86-05a86b091a9f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9bc65004</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Statutory Provisions </strong></p><ul><li>Insolvency Act 1986, ss 212, 213, 214, 423, Sch B1 paras 29 - 31</li><li>Companies Act 1948, s 332</li><li>Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, r. 3.17, 3.20, 3.24 and 3.25</li><li>Companies Act 2006, ss 171 - 177</li></ul><p><strong>Case Citations </strong></p><ul><li><em>Re Pantiles Investments </em>[2019] EWHC 1298 (Ch)</li><li><em>Global Corporate Ltd v Dirk Stefan Hale </em>[2018] EWCA Civ 2618</li><li><em>BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA </em>[2019] EWCA Civ 112</li><li><em>Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) v Fielding </em>[2019] EWHC 1566 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re NJM Clothing Ltd </em>[2018] EWHC 2388 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re Towcester Racecourse Ltd </em>[2018] EWHC 2902 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re Spaces London Bridge Ltd </em>[2018] EWHC 3099 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re HMV Ecommerce Ltd </em>[2019] EWHC 903 (Ch)</li></ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Statutory Provisions </strong></p><ul><li>Insolvency Act 1986, ss 212, 213, 214, 423, Sch B1 paras 29 - 31</li><li>Companies Act 1948, s 332</li><li>Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, r. 3.17, 3.20, 3.24 and 3.25</li><li>Companies Act 2006, ss 171 - 177</li></ul><p><strong>Case Citations </strong></p><ul><li><em>Re Pantiles Investments </em>[2019] EWHC 1298 (Ch)</li><li><em>Global Corporate Ltd v Dirk Stefan Hale </em>[2018] EWCA Civ 2618</li><li><em>BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA </em>[2019] EWCA Civ 112</li><li><em>Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) v Fielding </em>[2019] EWHC 1566 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re NJM Clothing Ltd </em>[2018] EWHC 2388 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re Towcester Racecourse Ltd </em>[2018] EWHC 2902 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re Spaces London Bridge Ltd </em>[2018] EWHC 3099 (Ch)</li><li><em>Re HMV Ecommerce Ltd </em>[2019] EWHC 903 (Ch)</li></ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 07:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9bc65004/3784be3d.mp3" length="26456922" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1649</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Phillip Patterson provides a summary of recent corporate insolvency cases covering:

Fraudulent trading;
Misfeasance, transactions defrauding creditors and the duties of directors; and
The out of court appointment of administrators.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Phillip Patterson provides a summary of recent corporate insolvency cases covering:

Fraudulent trading;
Misfeasance, transactions defrauding creditors and the duties of directors; and
The out of court appointment of administrators.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Insolvency, Phillip Patterson, Fraudulent Trading, Misfeasance, Administrators, Duties of Directors,</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas &amp; Rusz case</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas &amp; Rusz case</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5fd4392f-25dc-43ff-9d95-856871c111c2</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/f41d8c79</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<ul><li>Wright v Troy Lucas &amp; George Rusz [2019] EWHC 1098 (QB)</li><li>Freeman v Marshall &amp; Co [1966] EGD 695</li></ul><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<ul><li>Wright v Troy Lucas &amp; George Rusz [2019] EWHC 1098 (QB)</li><li>Freeman v Marshall &amp; Co [1966] EGD 695</li></ul><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Gatehouse Chambers</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/f41d8c79/0a3db5b5.mp3" length="17207663" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Gatehouse Chambers</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1071</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Colm Nugent explains the background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas &amp;amp; Rusz case in discussion with Laurence Page. This podcast covers:

1. facts of the underlying case
2. role of a McKenzie friend
3. duties of McKenzie friends and the degree to which they are subject to scrutiny
4. what is being done to alter the legal position regarding McKenzie friends</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Colm Nugent explains the background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas &amp;amp; Rusz case in discussion with Laurence Page. This podcast covers:

1. facts of the underlying case
2. role of a McKenzie friend
3. duties of McKenzie friends and the </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Clinical Negligence, McKenzie friends, Colm Nugent, Laurence Page</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Injunctions against persons unknown</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Injunctions against persons unknown</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29e4080a-f030-4de5-b0fc-116450321b8d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/acc8254f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and Steven Woolf discuss injunctions against persons unknown/quia timet and in particular:</p><ul><li>The differences between applying for orders over public and private land</li><li>What evidence the court requires and whether there are differences for owners of private rather than public land</li><li>The development of the types of order which succeed at court</li><li>The making of an order against someone who is only becomes a defendant when they do a future act and the application of CPR Rule 40.9</li><li>The importance of giving notice of the order</li><li>The extent to which these applications and orders are increasing in volume</li></ul><p>Case citations:</p><ul><li><strong><em>Vastint Leeds BV v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without Consent of the Claimant on Land and Buildings Comprising Part of the Development Site Known as the Former Tetley Brewery Site, Leeds</em></strong> [2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch)</li><li><strong><em>Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd &amp; Ors</em></strong><strong> </strong>[2019] EWCA Civ 515</li><li><strong><em>Waltham Forest Borough Council –v- Persons Unknown</em></strong> [2018] EWHC 24</li></ul><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and Steven Woolf discuss injunctions against persons unknown/quia timet and in particular:</p><ul><li>The differences between applying for orders over public and private land</li><li>What evidence the court requires and whether there are differences for owners of private rather than public land</li><li>The development of the types of order which succeed at court</li><li>The making of an order against someone who is only becomes a defendant when they do a future act and the application of CPR Rule 40.9</li><li>The importance of giving notice of the order</li><li>The extent to which these applications and orders are increasing in volume</li></ul><p>Case citations:</p><ul><li><strong><em>Vastint Leeds BV v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without Consent of the Claimant on Land and Buildings Comprising Part of the Development Site Known as the Former Tetley Brewery Site, Leeds</em></strong> [2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch)</li><li><strong><em>Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd &amp; Ors</em></strong><strong> </strong>[2019] EWCA Civ 515</li><li><strong><em>Waltham Forest Borough Council –v- Persons Unknown</em></strong> [2018] EWHC 24</li></ul><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <author>Hardwicke</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/acc8254f/b94af879.mp3" length="24113400" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Hardwicke</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1506</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and Steven Woolf discuss injunctions against persons unknown/quia timet and in particular:

The differences between applying for orders over public and private land
What evidence the court requires and whether there are differences for owners of private rather than public land
The development of the types of order which succeed at court
The making of an order against someone who is only becomes a defendant when they do a future act and the application of CPR Rule 40.9
The importance of giving notice of the order
The extent to which these applications and orders are increasing in volume</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and Steven Woolf discuss injunctions against persons unknown/quia timet and in particular:

The differences between applying for orders over public and private land
What evidence the court requires and whether there are difference</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>public land, private land, court, land owners, CPR Rule 40.9, Injunctions</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
