<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/for-that-matter" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>For That Matter</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/for-that-matter</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>For That Matter is a podcast from Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon featuring candid discussions between attorneys in the firm’s Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.
</description>
    <copyright>© 2026 Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>139caafe-897a-5960-87aa-a08d9b84d622</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:10:15 -0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:11:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:category text="Science"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/_ozcePTFrOjxJOr6yIwZ7WZ2PYGv0GXv6p_30uKZZJM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9iNjg2/NDBhNTVkMzM2NDc4/ZDhlZTA2ZDhlZjhl/MGM5Ni5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>For That Matter is a podcast from Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon featuring candid discussions between attorneys in the firm’s Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>For That Matter is a podcast from Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon featuring candid discussions between attorneys in the firm’s Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Unwrapping EPR: Packaging Laws, Producer Responsibility, and the Legal Fight Ahead</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Unwrapping EPR: Packaging Laws, Producer Responsibility, and the Legal Fight Ahead</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cb09aa74-eb35-495e-a2eb-2bfb69172d07</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a90eb2a0</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shook attorney Brandon Gilligan breaks down the packaging EPR laws sweeping across the states — who's covered, what producers owe, and the penalties for getting it wrong. Plus, a look at the first major legal challenge to these laws in Oregon, and what it could mean for the future of EPR nationwide.<br> <br><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/g/gilligan-brandon">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Brandon Gilligan</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services?type=practices&amp;service=environmental">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</p><p> </p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shook attorney Brandon Gilligan breaks down the packaging EPR laws sweeping across the states — who's covered, what producers owe, and the penalties for getting it wrong. Plus, a look at the first major legal challenge to these laws in Oregon, and what it could mean for the future of EPR nationwide.<br> <br><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/g/gilligan-brandon">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Brandon Gilligan</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services?type=practices&amp;service=environmental">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</p><p> </p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a90eb2a0/4f229dd2.mp3" length="11469604" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>714</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shook attorney Brandon Gilligan breaks down the packaging EPR laws sweeping across the states — who's covered, what producers owe, and the penalties for getting it wrong. Plus, a look at the first major legal challenge to these laws in Oregon, and what it could mean for the future of EPR nationwide.<br> <br><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/g/gilligan-brandon">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Brandon Gilligan</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services?type=practices&amp;service=environmental">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</p><p> </p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Removal or Remedial? CERCLA's Most Consequential Distinction</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Removal or Remedial? CERCLA's Most Consequential Distinction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d772ce8f-4c5a-4905-a0a1-58ed42ece339</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c850fbb3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Miss the statute of limitations, and your cost recovery claim is gone. In this episode, Shook attorney Hannah Hamblin digs into CERCLA's removal vs. remedial action framework — what separates a three-year window from a six-year one, where the circuits disagree, and why the answer almost always comes down to the specific facts on the ground.<br> <br><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/h/hamblin-hannah">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Hannah Hamblin.</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services?type=practices&amp;service=environmental">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</p><p> </p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Miss the statute of limitations, and your cost recovery claim is gone. In this episode, Shook attorney Hannah Hamblin digs into CERCLA's removal vs. remedial action framework — what separates a three-year window from a six-year one, where the circuits disagree, and why the answer almost always comes down to the specific facts on the ground.<br> <br><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/h/hamblin-hannah">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Hannah Hamblin.</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services?type=practices&amp;service=environmental">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</p><p> </p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 11:47:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c850fbb3/6f25fc87.mp3" length="16106335" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Shook, Hardy &amp; Bacon L.L.P.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/UWEiBXLdS6mX9MxoCvtVcs31yPzGts6PILpEMJkWup4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hNDI4/ZDdmNmM3MmEwYTE5/NTM4NTYyZjNkMzdi/YjFiOS5qcGc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>669</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Miss the statute of limitations, and your cost recovery claim is gone. In this episode, Shook attorney Hannah Hamblin digs into CERCLA's removal vs. remedial action framework — what separates a three-year window from a six-year one, where the circuits disagree, and why the answer almost always comes down to the specific facts on the ground.<br> <br><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/h/hamblin-hannah">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Hannah Hamblin.</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services?type=practices&amp;service=environmental">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Environmental and Toxic Tort practice.</p><p> </p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&amp;-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
