<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/fomo-investing" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>FOMO Investing</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/fomo-investing</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Brian and Mik explore the world of investing through real-world examples and behavioral economics principles.  </description>
    <copyright>© 2026 Brian and Mik</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>7db922e4-0fd1-5428-b103-a923e554e1bc</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:24:05 -0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:24:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Investing"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/NTU9MQ0m-LhZlGCe1DmUl8UM-DJ214Wbm-L3805rvLc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yODg0/ZjlmYWY4ZGQyZDE3/ODQ2ZDk4M2NmNjZi/NTU2ZS5qcGVn.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Brian and Mik explore the world of investing through real-world examples and behavioral economics principles.  </itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Brian and Mik explore the world of investing through real-world examples and behavioral economics principles.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Brian and Mik</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Jeremy Raper goes for extra credit at the Humm Group</title>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>24</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy Raper goes for extra credit at the Humm Group</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b66deeda-d550-4f0a-b954-a65393a66ef1</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a823de88</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Brian and Mik unpack a live activist situation at <strong>Humm Group</strong>, a small Australian non-bank lender now facing public pressure from investor <strong>Jeremy Raper</strong>, who owns ~6% of the company and is pushing for a vote on board change ahead of a February shareholder meeting.</p><p><br>They walk through the competing narratives: a founder-led board defending its strategy versus an activist arguing the company is undervalued due to poor governance and capital allocation. Along the way, they discuss downside protection, third-party bids, and special situations.</p><p>Rather than a stock pitch, this is a case study in pattern recognition: how governance disputes, excess cash, and strategic activist pressure can create asymmetric outcomes. <br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Brian and Mik unpack a live activist situation at <strong>Humm Group</strong>, a small Australian non-bank lender now facing public pressure from investor <strong>Jeremy Raper</strong>, who owns ~6% of the company and is pushing for a vote on board change ahead of a February shareholder meeting.</p><p><br>They walk through the competing narratives: a founder-led board defending its strategy versus an activist arguing the company is undervalued due to poor governance and capital allocation. Along the way, they discuss downside protection, third-party bids, and special situations.</p><p>Rather than a stock pitch, this is a case study in pattern recognition: how governance disputes, excess cash, and strategic activist pressure can create asymmetric outcomes. <br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a823de88/44aa47d1.mp3" length="56860283" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/zdlz0mlhsLr0dSym7SiyQlTeIXDF54D8_wge4p4duNY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xNjYx/ZWNiYjQ3NTRiYmNm/MmZiOTc0YzE1Y2Q1/MjU3Zi5qcGVn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Brian and Mik unpack a live activist situation at <strong>Humm Group</strong>, a small Australian non-bank lender now facing public pressure from investor <strong>Jeremy Raper</strong>, who owns ~6% of the company and is pushing for a vote on board change ahead of a February shareholder meeting.</p><p><br>They walk through the competing narratives: a founder-led board defending its strategy versus an activist arguing the company is undervalued due to poor governance and capital allocation. Along the way, they discuss downside protection, third-party bids, and special situations.</p><p>Rather than a stock pitch, this is a case study in pattern recognition: how governance disputes, excess cash, and strategic activist pressure can create asymmetric outcomes. <br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🥂 2 More FOMO — Holiday Special 2025</title>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>23</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>🥂 2 More FOMO — Holiday Special 2025</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2dca17f6-f2bf-4932-b021-e0ec4bd9d0ff</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/7b88ef2d</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this year-end episode, Brian and Mik reflect on <em>FOMO Investing</em>—its origins, how the podcast has evolved, and where they hope to take it in 2026. They revisit key themes from the past year, including quantum computing and GLP-1 biotechs, and share plans for the year ahead. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this year-end episode, Brian and Mik reflect on <em>FOMO Investing</em>—its origins, how the podcast has evolved, and where they hope to take it in 2026. They revisit key themes from the past year, including quantum computing and GLP-1 biotechs, and share plans for the year ahead. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:12:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/7b88ef2d/9f3fa4db.mp3" length="20173664" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/Gcu8XuLlJss9zCnhoQ_kfEVBe8nApw4C09NUVjW6I74/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81Y2Zj/OTIzM2Y2YzM4OGU1/ZmI1OGY2MDU0MzUw/M2YyNS5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1258</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this year-end episode, Brian and Mik reflect on <em>FOMO Investing</em>—its origins, how the podcast has evolved, and where they hope to take it in 2026. They revisit key themes from the past year, including quantum computing and GLP-1 biotechs, and share plans for the year ahead. </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>R2 - Rivian Reset?</title>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>R2 - Rivian Reset?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0546a1e6-87a8-4619-a2de-188a2cf9fd59</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a75b99e1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>After the post-IPO drawdown,  we review whether Rivian is worth another look. Rivian's software-first design, the Volkswagen JV, the R2, as well as its own autonomous driver investments, seem to indicate it may be more than just another EV manufacturer.  </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>After the post-IPO drawdown,  we review whether Rivian is worth another look. Rivian's software-first design, the Volkswagen JV, the R2, as well as its own autonomous driver investments, seem to indicate it may be more than just another EV manufacturer.  </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 11:13:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a75b99e1/fbbe6956.mp3" length="16773212" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/9eVx-5gtSh-eXVilZR2ll7iP5FXRz-WEuYVYgZxuMLE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81NjJk/M2EwNzc1NmJmZTk2/NDdjYWIxZjJkM2Rl/NTAwOC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1046</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>After the post-IPO drawdown,  we review whether Rivian is worth another look. Rivian's software-first design, the Volkswagen JV, the R2, as well as its own autonomous driver investments, seem to indicate it may be more than just another EV manufacturer.  </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sweetgreen (SG), Mixed Greens</title>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Sweetgreen (SG), Mixed Greens</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32d238a3-ed61-43a8-8c69-1d95c5f439a4</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/826cc2f7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>$15 salads, a 90% drawdown, and a very confused stock market. We explore Sweetgreen as a potential turnaround—what’s broken, what might work, and why demand alone doesn’t save a business. Sometimes the hardest investments aren’t the complex ones—they’re the obvious ones. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>$15 salads, a 90% drawdown, and a very confused stock market. We explore Sweetgreen as a potential turnaround—what’s broken, what might work, and why demand alone doesn’t save a business. Sometimes the hardest investments aren’t the complex ones—they’re the obvious ones. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 18:29:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/826cc2f7/15dd3f15.mp3" length="12441788" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/kAa6_aIcH9aqYarDsKlKAZjojYYakAT3dg4TcFDOyH0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80Mzdk/YWJhOGM0ZTg0NDEy/ZDMyN2QwZGZjNTcw/MGU0Mi5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>$15 salads, a 90% drawdown, and a very confused stock market. We explore Sweetgreen as a potential turnaround—what’s broken, what might work, and why demand alone doesn’t save a business. Sometimes the hardest investments aren’t the complex ones—they’re the obvious ones. </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IonQ Update,  November 2025</title>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>20</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>IonQ Update,  November 2025</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0841ec2f-22dd-40d3-8bcb-8db7161bf20e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/2520103b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik revisit <strong>IonQ (IONQ)</strong>. </p><p>Building on our original <em>Theory of the Case</em> from November 2024 and our January 2025 update, we unpack recent developments, including:</p><ul><li>Management changes (CEO and CFO),</li><li>IonQ's competitive position in the broader quantum market.</li><li>Challenging valuation metrics ($15 -16 billion on $100 million of revenue)</li><li>IonQ's $2 billion in Equity financing at $93/share  (h/t to Andrew Walker's piece that has a great breakdown of this, link below)</li></ul><p><br>🔗 Links</p><ul><li>Theory of the Case — IonQ (Nov 2024): <a href="https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/theory-of-the-case-ionq">https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/theory-of-the-case-ionq</a></li><li>IonQ Update (Jan 2025): <a href="https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/ionq-january-2025">https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/ionq-january-2025</a></li><li>Andrew Walker on IonQ financing: <a href="https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/p/the-evolution-of-meme-stock-financing">https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/p/the-evolution-of-meme-stock-financing</a></li><li>Chris Monroe on quantum computing and IonQ <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&amp;t=6249s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&amp;t=6249s</a></li></ul><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik revisit <strong>IonQ (IONQ)</strong>. </p><p>Building on our original <em>Theory of the Case</em> from November 2024 and our January 2025 update, we unpack recent developments, including:</p><ul><li>Management changes (CEO and CFO),</li><li>IonQ's competitive position in the broader quantum market.</li><li>Challenging valuation metrics ($15 -16 billion on $100 million of revenue)</li><li>IonQ's $2 billion in Equity financing at $93/share  (h/t to Andrew Walker's piece that has a great breakdown of this, link below)</li></ul><p><br>🔗 Links</p><ul><li>Theory of the Case — IonQ (Nov 2024): <a href="https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/theory-of-the-case-ionq">https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/theory-of-the-case-ionq</a></li><li>IonQ Update (Jan 2025): <a href="https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/ionq-january-2025">https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/ionq-january-2025</a></li><li>Andrew Walker on IonQ financing: <a href="https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/p/the-evolution-of-meme-stock-financing">https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/p/the-evolution-of-meme-stock-financing</a></li><li>Chris Monroe on quantum computing and IonQ <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&amp;t=6249s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&amp;t=6249s</a></li></ul><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:22:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2520103b/9a8d8d8d.mp3" length="15840327" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>989</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik revisit <strong>IonQ (IONQ)</strong>. </p><p>Building on our original <em>Theory of the Case</em> from November 2024 and our January 2025 update, we unpack recent developments, including:</p><ul><li>Management changes (CEO and CFO),</li><li>IonQ's competitive position in the broader quantum market.</li><li>Challenging valuation metrics ($15 -16 billion on $100 million of revenue)</li><li>IonQ's $2 billion in Equity financing at $93/share  (h/t to Andrew Walker's piece that has a great breakdown of this, link below)</li></ul><p><br>🔗 Links</p><ul><li>Theory of the Case — IonQ (Nov 2024): <a href="https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/theory-of-the-case-ionq">https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/theory-of-the-case-ionq</a></li><li>IonQ Update (Jan 2025): <a href="https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/ionq-january-2025">https://fomo.transistor.fm/episodes/ionq-january-2025</a></li><li>Andrew Walker on IonQ financing: <a href="https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/p/the-evolution-of-meme-stock-financing">https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/p/the-evolution-of-meme-stock-financing</a></li><li>Chris Monroe on quantum computing and IonQ <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&amp;t=6249s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eo_VV0Z4aE&amp;t=6249s</a></li></ul><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dealable — Oct 31: Trillion-Dollar AI, Billion-Dollar Biotech</title>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Dealable — Oct 31: Trillion-Dollar AI, Billion-Dollar Biotech</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae738a4b-610c-412c-bfb1-193981a251af</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/9a2a341c</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>OpenAI is racing toward a trillion-dollar valuation while burning tens of billions on chips, data centers, and Azure commitments. We break down the new capital structure, Microsoft’s leverage, why Zuck is FOMO-building compute, and whether OpenAI should even <em>want</em> to be a public company. Also: the underrated bottlenecks—power, foundries, CUDA, China—and why this boom feels like 1999 with actual revenue.</p><p><br>Then we jump to biotech to cover the Pfizer and Novo bidding war for Metsera (Pfizer ultimately won with its $8 billion deal).  The bidding for Metesera  drew at least six bidders and may set-off a chain reaction in the GLP-1 space. We speculate on what this deal might mean for Viking (VKTX) and others in the GLP-1 / obesity space.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>OpenAI is racing toward a trillion-dollar valuation while burning tens of billions on chips, data centers, and Azure commitments. We break down the new capital structure, Microsoft’s leverage, why Zuck is FOMO-building compute, and whether OpenAI should even <em>want</em> to be a public company. Also: the underrated bottlenecks—power, foundries, CUDA, China—and why this boom feels like 1999 with actual revenue.</p><p><br>Then we jump to biotech to cover the Pfizer and Novo bidding war for Metsera (Pfizer ultimately won with its $8 billion deal).  The bidding for Metesera  drew at least six bidders and may set-off a chain reaction in the GLP-1 space. We speculate on what this deal might mean for Viking (VKTX) and others in the GLP-1 / obesity space.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:18:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/9a2a341c/d2671838.mp3" length="34715512" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/p8j7mYSCCCmxg_a43N1DKKXsytTrtSakgq61TvnwkS0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yZDNk/ZWNhZWEwMWQxY2Qy/MzIxNGFkOGMzNjFl/ZTM3NC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2168</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>OpenAI is racing toward a trillion-dollar valuation while burning tens of billions on chips, data centers, and Azure commitments. We break down the new capital structure, Microsoft’s leverage, why Zuck is FOMO-building compute, and whether OpenAI should even <em>want</em> to be a public company. Also: the underrated bottlenecks—power, foundries, CUDA, China—and why this boom feels like 1999 with actual revenue.</p><p><br>Then we jump to biotech to cover the Pfizer and Novo bidding war for Metsera (Pfizer ultimately won with its $8 billion deal).  The bidding for Metesera  drew at least six bidders and may set-off a chain reaction in the GLP-1 space. We speculate on what this deal might mean for Viking (VKTX) and others in the GLP-1 / obesity space.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI Eats Everything</title>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>AI Eats Everything</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2f653912-e33f-41c2-b612-11c68cf05db9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/93df25f5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The AI &amp; investing episode. Brian and Mik talk about whether AI will actually replace white-collar jobs or just transform them, how professionals can stay relevant by becoming AI-powered specialists, and where value might accrue across chips, power, “boring” traditional industries, and healthcare and drug discovery. They also explore whether giants like OpenAI will hoover up SaaS, how constraints in compute and electricity could shape the next decade, and why the biggest AI winners may come from unknown unknowns we can’t yet see. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The AI &amp; investing episode. Brian and Mik talk about whether AI will actually replace white-collar jobs or just transform them, how professionals can stay relevant by becoming AI-powered specialists, and where value might accrue across chips, power, “boring” traditional industries, and healthcare and drug discovery. They also explore whether giants like OpenAI will hoover up SaaS, how constraints in compute and electricity could shape the next decade, and why the biggest AI winners may come from unknown unknowns we can’t yet see. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 17:14:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/93df25f5/1747012d.mp3" length="52229082" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/lwrEj1negTfCdQBR8wgleJ9BgrXwFVPklMiB09t_AXU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xODFi/ODMyYzBmZTc2MDY5/ZGUxMDNkMWEzMDQy/MzM4OC5wbmc.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2610</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>The AI &amp; investing episode. Brian and Mik talk about whether AI will actually replace white-collar jobs or just transform them, how professionals can stay relevant by becoming AI-powered specialists, and where value might accrue across chips, power, “boring” traditional industries, and healthcare and drug discovery. They also explore whether giants like OpenAI will hoover up SaaS, how constraints in compute and electricity could shape the next decade, and why the biggest AI winners may come from unknown unknowns we can’t yet see. </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dealable, 15th August 2025</title>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Dealable, 15th August 2025</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">273547a7-84ed-4b7b-a946-0a93689ae251</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a834377a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Brian and Mik launch a new segment called “Dealable”—where they set aside strict analysis and let their imaginations run on mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, and spin-outs that should happen (even if they probably won’t).</p><p><br></p><p>The conversation kicks off with Apple’s AI dilemma—is Siri too far behind, and could Apple’s cash hoard finally push them into a big acquisition? Would buying Perplexity or Anthropic give them the AI-native layer their ecosystem needs? And what about the $20B Google search deal that DOJ scrutiny could upend?</p><p><br></p><p>From there, they turn to Alphabet/Google, exploring what a DOJ-mandated divestiture could look like. Could Waymo be spun out to unlock value? What happens if Chrome were ever separated from Google Search? And whether DOJ case may require a meaningful remedy from Google (and possibly Apple).</p><p><br></p><p>It’s an episode full of hot takes, half-baked speculation, and a few insights that might just age into real deals.</p><p><br></p><p>Disclaimer: The views expressed are for entertainment purposes only. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Brian and Mik launch a new segment called “Dealable”—where they set aside strict analysis and let their imaginations run on mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, and spin-outs that should happen (even if they probably won’t).</p><p><br></p><p>The conversation kicks off with Apple’s AI dilemma—is Siri too far behind, and could Apple’s cash hoard finally push them into a big acquisition? Would buying Perplexity or Anthropic give them the AI-native layer their ecosystem needs? And what about the $20B Google search deal that DOJ scrutiny could upend?</p><p><br></p><p>From there, they turn to Alphabet/Google, exploring what a DOJ-mandated divestiture could look like. Could Waymo be spun out to unlock value? What happens if Chrome were ever separated from Google Search? And whether DOJ case may require a meaningful remedy from Google (and possibly Apple).</p><p><br></p><p>It’s an episode full of hot takes, half-baked speculation, and a few insights that might just age into real deals.</p><p><br></p><p>Disclaimer: The views expressed are for entertainment purposes only. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 16:33:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a834377a/cf9846c4.mp3" length="39514370" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1975</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Brian and Mik launch a new segment called “Dealable”—where they set aside strict analysis and let their imaginations run on mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, and spin-outs that should happen (even if they probably won’t).</p><p><br></p><p>The conversation kicks off with Apple’s AI dilemma—is Siri too far behind, and could Apple’s cash hoard finally push them into a big acquisition? Would buying Perplexity or Anthropic give them the AI-native layer their ecosystem needs? And what about the $20B Google search deal that DOJ scrutiny could upend?</p><p><br></p><p>From there, they turn to Alphabet/Google, exploring what a DOJ-mandated divestiture could look like. Could Waymo be spun out to unlock value? What happens if Chrome were ever separated from Google Search? And whether DOJ case may require a meaningful remedy from Google (and possibly Apple).</p><p><br></p><p>It’s an episode full of hot takes, half-baked speculation, and a few insights that might just age into real deals.</p><p><br></p><p>Disclaimer: The views expressed are for entertainment purposes only. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Theory Check-In: ANSYS/Synopsys, Foundries, and VKTX</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Theory Check-In: ANSYS/Synopsys, Foundries, and VKTX</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47571b13-2409-46f1-a574-f2f61a7a37a3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a98dc96e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>(This show was recorded on 31st July 2025)</p><p>Brian and Mik catch up on a few investment ideas they have been following</p><p><strong><br>What we cover<br></strong><br></p><ul><li><strong>ANSYS × Synopsys</strong>: the deal closed; why a stock-and-cash structure gave us yield <em>and</em> long-term exposure, and how we’re thinking about integration risk and the opportunity ahead. (TLdR: We are still long Synosys)<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Semis &amp; the “foundry question”</strong>: Intel sentiment whiplash, a new CEO with a turnaround pedigree, and the reality of competing with TSMC scale. We speculate on Intel's potential outcome(s) and what second-order effects may be for the ecosystem, including TSMC.<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Viking Therapeutics (VKTX)</strong>: why a fast-follower with both subcutaneous and oral programs still looks interesting in a market dominated by Novo/Lilly; the real risks (short interest, dilution, timelines) and why patience, position sizing and buying well matters.<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Process over predictions</strong>: how we use updates like these to revisit assumptions without over-trading the noise.<p></p></li></ul><p>Disclaimer: The views expressed are for entertainment purposes only. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>(This show was recorded on 31st July 2025)</p><p>Brian and Mik catch up on a few investment ideas they have been following</p><p><strong><br>What we cover<br></strong><br></p><ul><li><strong>ANSYS × Synopsys</strong>: the deal closed; why a stock-and-cash structure gave us yield <em>and</em> long-term exposure, and how we’re thinking about integration risk and the opportunity ahead. (TLdR: We are still long Synosys)<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Semis &amp; the “foundry question”</strong>: Intel sentiment whiplash, a new CEO with a turnaround pedigree, and the reality of competing with TSMC scale. We speculate on Intel's potential outcome(s) and what second-order effects may be for the ecosystem, including TSMC.<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Viking Therapeutics (VKTX)</strong>: why a fast-follower with both subcutaneous and oral programs still looks interesting in a market dominated by Novo/Lilly; the real risks (short interest, dilution, timelines) and why patience, position sizing and buying well matters.<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Process over predictions</strong>: how we use updates like these to revisit assumptions without over-trading the noise.<p></p></li></ul><p>Disclaimer: The views expressed are for entertainment purposes only. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 16:31:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a98dc96e/f8142497.mp3" length="60761596" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3037</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>(This show was recorded on 31st July 2025)</p><p>Brian and Mik catch up on a few investment ideas they have been following</p><p><strong><br>What we cover<br></strong><br></p><ul><li><strong>ANSYS × Synopsys</strong>: the deal closed; why a stock-and-cash structure gave us yield <em>and</em> long-term exposure, and how we’re thinking about integration risk and the opportunity ahead. (TLdR: We are still long Synosys)<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Semis &amp; the “foundry question”</strong>: Intel sentiment whiplash, a new CEO with a turnaround pedigree, and the reality of competing with TSMC scale. We speculate on Intel's potential outcome(s) and what second-order effects may be for the ecosystem, including TSMC.<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Viking Therapeutics (VKTX)</strong>: why a fast-follower with both subcutaneous and oral programs still looks interesting in a market dominated by Novo/Lilly; the real risks (short interest, dilution, timelines) and why patience, position sizing and buying well matters.<p><br></p></li><li><strong>Process over predictions</strong>: how we use updates like these to revisit assumptions without over-trading the noise.<p></p></li></ul><p>Disclaimer: The views expressed are for entertainment purposes only. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thesis Grading a multi-year investment in TG Therapeutics (TGTX)</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Thesis Grading a multi-year investment in TG Therapeutics (TGTX)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9d0cd1f-d19f-409e-b1d7-3b1764048121</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c3f169df</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian O’Neill and Mikhail Bulchandani do a deep dive into one of Brian’s favorite stocks, TG Therapeutics (TGTX).  Brian outlines his multi-year investment thesis in TGTX, from its setbacks in oncology to its successful commercialization of Briumvi (ublituximab) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.</p><p><br><strong>What You’ll Learn:</strong></p><ul><li>TG Therapeutics’ evolution to a successful commercial-stage biotech. </li><li>Practical investment strategies for investing in biotech companies like TGTX.</li><li>Insights into the multiple sclerosis treatment landscape, and the growing market for anti-CD20 therapies, including Roche's Ocrevus, Novartis’s Kesimpta, and TG’s Briumvi.</li><li>How Briumvi has been able to gain market traction.</li><li>Upcoming catalysts for TG Therapeutics, including the potential for a label update to skip the initial dose, the potential to speed up infusions from 1 hour to 30-minutes, and the development of a subcutaneous formulation of Briumvi.</li><li>A discussion about Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi), a new class of disease modifying therapies in clinical trials for the treatment of MS.</li><li>How TG Therapeutics has positioned itself as a compelling acquisition target.</li><li>Brian revisits his February 8, 2024 article on TGTX, written when TG was at $14.32.  Recently shares have traded between $35 and $40.  </li><li>Brian updates his forecast for when TG will achieve a $1 billion net product sales run-rate, and notes that the company today is considerably de-risked with market traction and net positive cash flows.</li></ul><p><strong>Links</strong></p><ul><li><a href="https://flourishingcapital.beehiiv.com/p/tg-therapeutics-inferring-expectations">Brian’s February 8, 2024 article on TGTX</a></li><li><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40332733/">The Evolution of Anti‑CD20 Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis: Optimization of Antibody Characteristics and Function</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2503891">Progress toward Mitigating Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis</a></li></ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian O’Neill and Mikhail Bulchandani do a deep dive into one of Brian’s favorite stocks, TG Therapeutics (TGTX).  Brian outlines his multi-year investment thesis in TGTX, from its setbacks in oncology to its successful commercialization of Briumvi (ublituximab) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.</p><p><br><strong>What You’ll Learn:</strong></p><ul><li>TG Therapeutics’ evolution to a successful commercial-stage biotech. </li><li>Practical investment strategies for investing in biotech companies like TGTX.</li><li>Insights into the multiple sclerosis treatment landscape, and the growing market for anti-CD20 therapies, including Roche's Ocrevus, Novartis’s Kesimpta, and TG’s Briumvi.</li><li>How Briumvi has been able to gain market traction.</li><li>Upcoming catalysts for TG Therapeutics, including the potential for a label update to skip the initial dose, the potential to speed up infusions from 1 hour to 30-minutes, and the development of a subcutaneous formulation of Briumvi.</li><li>A discussion about Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi), a new class of disease modifying therapies in clinical trials for the treatment of MS.</li><li>How TG Therapeutics has positioned itself as a compelling acquisition target.</li><li>Brian revisits his February 8, 2024 article on TGTX, written when TG was at $14.32.  Recently shares have traded between $35 and $40.  </li><li>Brian updates his forecast for when TG will achieve a $1 billion net product sales run-rate, and notes that the company today is considerably de-risked with market traction and net positive cash flows.</li></ul><p><strong>Links</strong></p><ul><li><a href="https://flourishingcapital.beehiiv.com/p/tg-therapeutics-inferring-expectations">Brian’s February 8, 2024 article on TGTX</a></li><li><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40332733/">The Evolution of Anti‑CD20 Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis: Optimization of Antibody Characteristics and Function</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2503891">Progress toward Mitigating Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis</a></li></ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:27:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c3f169df/fedbf093.mp3" length="53949169" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2696</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian O’Neill and Mikhail Bulchandani do a deep dive into one of Brian’s favorite stocks, TG Therapeutics (TGTX).  Brian outlines his multi-year investment thesis in TGTX, from its setbacks in oncology to its successful commercialization of Briumvi (ublituximab) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.</p><p><br><strong>What You’ll Learn:</strong></p><ul><li>TG Therapeutics’ evolution to a successful commercial-stage biotech. </li><li>Practical investment strategies for investing in biotech companies like TGTX.</li><li>Insights into the multiple sclerosis treatment landscape, and the growing market for anti-CD20 therapies, including Roche's Ocrevus, Novartis’s Kesimpta, and TG’s Briumvi.</li><li>How Briumvi has been able to gain market traction.</li><li>Upcoming catalysts for TG Therapeutics, including the potential for a label update to skip the initial dose, the potential to speed up infusions from 1 hour to 30-minutes, and the development of a subcutaneous formulation of Briumvi.</li><li>A discussion about Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi), a new class of disease modifying therapies in clinical trials for the treatment of MS.</li><li>How TG Therapeutics has positioned itself as a compelling acquisition target.</li><li>Brian revisits his February 8, 2024 article on TGTX, written when TG was at $14.32.  Recently shares have traded between $35 and $40.  </li><li>Brian updates his forecast for when TG will achieve a $1 billion net product sales run-rate, and notes that the company today is considerably de-risked with market traction and net positive cash flows.</li></ul><p><strong>Links</strong></p><ul><li><a href="https://flourishingcapital.beehiiv.com/p/tg-therapeutics-inferring-expectations">Brian’s February 8, 2024 article on TGTX</a></li><li><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40332733/">The Evolution of Anti‑CD20 Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis: Optimization of Antibody Characteristics and Function</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2503891">Progress toward Mitigating Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis</a></li></ul>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Carvana: The Stock Has Been a Wild Ride.  Buckle Up for a Test Drive. 🚗</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Carvana: The Stock Has Been a Wild Ride.  Buckle Up for a Test Drive. 🚗</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9cfc3c04-7035-48ac-9965-470cd37c5079</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/50a431a5</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of FOMO Investing, Brian and Mik dive into the volatile world of Carvana, exploring its business model, recent stock performance, and the ongoing debate between short and long theses. Mik shares his personal experience selling cars to Carvana during the pandemic, leading into a discussion about the company's unique approach to the used car market. They analyze Carvana's operational efficiencies, the controversy surrounding related-party transactions, and the potential future of online car sales. <br><strong><br>Links Mentioned</strong></p><ul><li>Cliff Sosin,  <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cliff-sosin-from-cas-on-carvana-and-a-bunch-of/id1526149547?i=1000706848966">Yet Another Value Podcast</a></li><li>Recurve,  <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/recurve-capitals-aaron-chan-on-the-scalability/id1526149547?i=1000688933320">Yet Another Value Podcast</a></li><li>Recurve <a href="https://recurvecap.com/insights/carvana-recurves-response-to-hindenburgs-short-attack">Rebuttal</a></li><li>Cliff Sosin, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laBi8as1FrE">Invest Like The Best</a></li><li><a href="https://hindenburgresearch.com/carvana/">Hindenburg Short Theses<br></a><br></li></ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of FOMO Investing, Brian and Mik dive into the volatile world of Carvana, exploring its business model, recent stock performance, and the ongoing debate between short and long theses. Mik shares his personal experience selling cars to Carvana during the pandemic, leading into a discussion about the company's unique approach to the used car market. They analyze Carvana's operational efficiencies, the controversy surrounding related-party transactions, and the potential future of online car sales. <br><strong><br>Links Mentioned</strong></p><ul><li>Cliff Sosin,  <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cliff-sosin-from-cas-on-carvana-and-a-bunch-of/id1526149547?i=1000706848966">Yet Another Value Podcast</a></li><li>Recurve,  <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/recurve-capitals-aaron-chan-on-the-scalability/id1526149547?i=1000688933320">Yet Another Value Podcast</a></li><li>Recurve <a href="https://recurvecap.com/insights/carvana-recurves-response-to-hindenburgs-short-attack">Rebuttal</a></li><li>Cliff Sosin, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laBi8as1FrE">Invest Like The Best</a></li><li><a href="https://hindenburgresearch.com/carvana/">Hindenburg Short Theses<br></a><br></li></ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 16:33:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/50a431a5/b76eb82d.mp3" length="50754777" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2537</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of FOMO Investing, Brian and Mik dive into the volatile world of Carvana, exploring its business model, recent stock performance, and the ongoing debate between short and long theses. Mik shares his personal experience selling cars to Carvana during the pandemic, leading into a discussion about the company's unique approach to the used car market. They analyze Carvana's operational efficiencies, the controversy surrounding related-party transactions, and the potential future of online car sales. <br><strong><br>Links Mentioned</strong></p><ul><li>Cliff Sosin,  <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cliff-sosin-from-cas-on-carvana-and-a-bunch-of/id1526149547?i=1000706848966">Yet Another Value Podcast</a></li><li>Recurve,  <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/recurve-capitals-aaron-chan-on-the-scalability/id1526149547?i=1000688933320">Yet Another Value Podcast</a></li><li>Recurve <a href="https://recurvecap.com/insights/carvana-recurves-response-to-hindenburgs-short-attack">Rebuttal</a></li><li>Cliff Sosin, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laBi8as1FrE">Invest Like The Best</a></li><li><a href="https://hindenburgresearch.com/carvana/">Hindenburg Short Theses<br></a><br></li></ul>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is FOMO Investing?</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>What is FOMO Investing?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aa54c161-e695-4279-8e62-b715e86f697d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8246cf69</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the lucky no. 13 episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>,  we explore the powerful yet often misunderstood force of "Fear of Missing Out" (FOMO) in investing. We unpack the psychology behind why investors often feel compelled to act impulsively and discuss how some legendary investors harness this instinct to their advantage. We explore how to turn the urge to act into a structured process that maximizes your edge without succumbing to panic or peer pressure.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the lucky no. 13 episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>,  we explore the powerful yet often misunderstood force of "Fear of Missing Out" (FOMO) in investing. We unpack the psychology behind why investors often feel compelled to act impulsively and discuss how some legendary investors harness this instinct to their advantage. We explore how to turn the urge to act into a structured process that maximizes your edge without succumbing to panic or peer pressure.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 20:56:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8246cf69/e8af4eb4.mp3" length="56280804" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2813</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the lucky no. 13 episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>,  we explore the powerful yet often misunderstood force of "Fear of Missing Out" (FOMO) in investing. We unpack the psychology behind why investors often feel compelled to act impulsively and discuss how some legendary investors harness this instinct to their advantage. We explore how to turn the urge to act into a structured process that maximizes your edge without succumbing to panic or peer pressure.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ANSYS + Synopsys Merger - Theory Of The Case</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>ANSYS + Synopsys Merger - Theory Of The Case</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">469c9bea-0782-414f-8bf4-ffc2005df622</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/630a077f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on the <strong>ANSYS</strong> + <strong>Synopsys  </strong>merger. We cover the potential upside from the deal. Why  ANSYS + Synopsys could be the backbone of <em>Physics AI. </em>The merger arbitrage opportunity and lessons from past trades (hello, Rite Aid 👀)</p><p><strong>Key Topics Covered:</strong></p><ul><li>🧠 <strong>What ANSYS and Synopsys actually do</strong> and why they matter</li><li>💻 CAE + EDA: how the merger creates an end-to-end design environment</li><li>🤖 <em>Physics AI</em>: the untapped potential of generative models trained on physical simulation data</li><li>📈 Deep dive into the merger economics, risks, and timeline</li><li>💰 How to think about <strong>merger arbitrage</strong> as a strategy—when it works and when it burns</li></ul><p><strong><br>Links:</strong><br>🎧 ANSYS CTO Dr. Prith Banerjee talks about the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ic5xgJt6BQ&amp;t=2107s">future of AI in Physics and Simulation</a> on the Neil Ashton Podcast</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on the <strong>ANSYS</strong> + <strong>Synopsys  </strong>merger. We cover the potential upside from the deal. Why  ANSYS + Synopsys could be the backbone of <em>Physics AI. </em>The merger arbitrage opportunity and lessons from past trades (hello, Rite Aid 👀)</p><p><strong>Key Topics Covered:</strong></p><ul><li>🧠 <strong>What ANSYS and Synopsys actually do</strong> and why they matter</li><li>💻 CAE + EDA: how the merger creates an end-to-end design environment</li><li>🤖 <em>Physics AI</em>: the untapped potential of generative models trained on physical simulation data</li><li>📈 Deep dive into the merger economics, risks, and timeline</li><li>💰 How to think about <strong>merger arbitrage</strong> as a strategy—when it works and when it burns</li></ul><p><strong><br>Links:</strong><br>🎧 ANSYS CTO Dr. Prith Banerjee talks about the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ic5xgJt6BQ&amp;t=2107s">future of AI in Physics and Simulation</a> on the Neil Ashton Podcast</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:47:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/630a077f/b166a9f7.mp3" length="40213469" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2010</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on the <strong>ANSYS</strong> + <strong>Synopsys  </strong>merger. We cover the potential upside from the deal. Why  ANSYS + Synopsys could be the backbone of <em>Physics AI. </em>The merger arbitrage opportunity and lessons from past trades (hello, Rite Aid 👀)</p><p><strong>Key Topics Covered:</strong></p><ul><li>🧠 <strong>What ANSYS and Synopsys actually do</strong> and why they matter</li><li>💻 CAE + EDA: how the merger creates an end-to-end design environment</li><li>🤖 <em>Physics AI</em>: the untapped potential of generative models trained on physical simulation data</li><li>📈 Deep dive into the merger economics, risks, and timeline</li><li>💰 How to think about <strong>merger arbitrage</strong> as a strategy—when it works and when it burns</li></ul><p><strong><br>Links:</strong><br>🎧 ANSYS CTO Dr. Prith Banerjee talks about the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ic5xgJt6BQ&amp;t=2107s">future of AI in Physics and Simulation</a> on the Neil Ashton Podcast</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Checkpoint Therapeutics (CKPT)   - Theory Of The Trade</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Checkpoint Therapeutics (CKPT)   - Theory Of The Trade</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15689dd2-8562-4f09-acbd-c6e11383c98a</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/26941192</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we dive into the full story of <strong>Checkpoint Therapeutics</strong>, a microcap biotech that just entered into an agreement to be acquired by Sun Pharma. Brian walks us through his personal “theory of the case”—from early conviction to final outcome—including investor psychology, capital efficiency, clinical development hurdles, and what the CVRs (Contingent Value Rights) might still deliver post-deal.</p><p><br>We explore the science behind Checkpoint UNLOXCYT™.  How Checkpoint navigated FDA delays, dilution, and an unforgiving cash runway — all leading to an eventual <strong>$355 million acquisition</strong>.</p><p><br>Whether you're into biotech investing, thesis-driven trades, or just love a good underdog story, this one is packed with lessons on risk, timing, and what it takes to bring a new cancer therapy to market.</p><p><strong>💡 Key Topics Covered:</strong></p><ul><li>Why Checkpoint Therapeutics caught Brian’s eye in 2021</li><li>The cancer drug (cosibelimab) that made it all happen</li><li>Lessons in biotech cash burn, dilution, and timing</li><li>How to size positions in high-risk trades</li><li>What the 70¢ CVR could still mean for shareholders</li><li>The growing role of fast followers in immunotherapy</li><li>Emotional anchoring, stubbornness, and scorekeeping as an investor</li></ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we dive into the full story of <strong>Checkpoint Therapeutics</strong>, a microcap biotech that just entered into an agreement to be acquired by Sun Pharma. Brian walks us through his personal “theory of the case”—from early conviction to final outcome—including investor psychology, capital efficiency, clinical development hurdles, and what the CVRs (Contingent Value Rights) might still deliver post-deal.</p><p><br>We explore the science behind Checkpoint UNLOXCYT™.  How Checkpoint navigated FDA delays, dilution, and an unforgiving cash runway — all leading to an eventual <strong>$355 million acquisition</strong>.</p><p><br>Whether you're into biotech investing, thesis-driven trades, or just love a good underdog story, this one is packed with lessons on risk, timing, and what it takes to bring a new cancer therapy to market.</p><p><strong>💡 Key Topics Covered:</strong></p><ul><li>Why Checkpoint Therapeutics caught Brian’s eye in 2021</li><li>The cancer drug (cosibelimab) that made it all happen</li><li>Lessons in biotech cash burn, dilution, and timing</li><li>How to size positions in high-risk trades</li><li>What the 70¢ CVR could still mean for shareholders</li><li>The growing role of fast followers in immunotherapy</li><li>Emotional anchoring, stubbornness, and scorekeeping as an investor</li></ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:07:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/26941192/b7228835.mp3" length="47288199" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2363</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we dive into the full story of <strong>Checkpoint Therapeutics</strong>, a microcap biotech that just entered into an agreement to be acquired by Sun Pharma. Brian walks us through his personal “theory of the case”—from early conviction to final outcome—including investor psychology, capital efficiency, clinical development hurdles, and what the CVRs (Contingent Value Rights) might still deliver post-deal.</p><p><br>We explore the science behind Checkpoint UNLOXCYT™.  How Checkpoint navigated FDA delays, dilution, and an unforgiving cash runway — all leading to an eventual <strong>$355 million acquisition</strong>.</p><p><br>Whether you're into biotech investing, thesis-driven trades, or just love a good underdog story, this one is packed with lessons on risk, timing, and what it takes to bring a new cancer therapy to market.</p><p><strong>💡 Key Topics Covered:</strong></p><ul><li>Why Checkpoint Therapeutics caught Brian’s eye in 2021</li><li>The cancer drug (cosibelimab) that made it all happen</li><li>Lessons in biotech cash burn, dilution, and timing</li><li>How to size positions in high-risk trades</li><li>What the 70¢ CVR could still mean for shareholders</li><li>The growing role of fast followers in immunotherapy</li><li>Emotional anchoring, stubbornness, and scorekeeping as an investor</li></ul>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IonQ  ~ January 2025</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>IonQ  ~ January 2025</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7336688e-464e-40f3-bee8-5d03541cf463</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1eb593fb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>An update to our Theory of The Case (TOTC) on IonQ ~ mid-January 2025.  </p><p>We review Jensen Huang's and Mark Zuckerburg's claims about the timeline for useful quantum computing (being 15+ years out). We also include IonQ management responses, including the CFO's (Thomas Kramer) view. </p><p>We reflect on the current state of play of AI and the potential role for Quantum computing. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>An update to our Theory of The Case (TOTC) on IonQ ~ mid-January 2025.  </p><p>We review Jensen Huang's and Mark Zuckerburg's claims about the timeline for useful quantum computing (being 15+ years out). We also include IonQ management responses, including the CFO's (Thomas Kramer) view. </p><p>We reflect on the current state of play of AI and the potential role for Quantum computing. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:32:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1eb593fb/8952e900.mp3" length="47879058" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>An update to our Theory of The Case (TOTC) on IonQ ~ mid-January 2025.  </p><p>We review Jensen Huang's and Mark Zuckerburg's claims about the timeline for useful quantum computing (being 15+ years out). We also include IonQ management responses, including the CFO's (Thomas Kramer) view. </p><p>We reflect on the current state of play of AI and the potential role for Quantum computing. </p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bitcoin Deep Dive: Myth, Meme, or Mind-Virus?</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Bitcoin Deep Dive: Myth, Meme, or Mind-Virus?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2503681c-3905-40be-a046-c8889f1574ee</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c344c75f</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this end-of-year episode, Brian and Mik explore the evolution of Bitcoin—from its mysterious beginnings with Satoshi Nakamoto’s 2008 white paper to its current six-figure price. They discuss how Bitcoin’s role has shifted from “electronic cash” to a potential reserve asset, the concept of “digital real estate,” and whether it truly lives up to its promise of decentralization. They also discuss skepticism by prominent figures like Charlie Munger and Jamie Dimon, debate energy usage, and consider Bitcoin’s ongoing risk from governments and regulatory bodies. If you’re curious about how Bitcoin got here, and what the maximalists believe, this conversation is for you.</p><p><br>Disclaimer: The content in this podcast is for entertainment purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Always do your own research.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this end-of-year episode, Brian and Mik explore the evolution of Bitcoin—from its mysterious beginnings with Satoshi Nakamoto’s 2008 white paper to its current six-figure price. They discuss how Bitcoin’s role has shifted from “electronic cash” to a potential reserve asset, the concept of “digital real estate,” and whether it truly lives up to its promise of decentralization. They also discuss skepticism by prominent figures like Charlie Munger and Jamie Dimon, debate energy usage, and consider Bitcoin’s ongoing risk from governments and regulatory bodies. If you’re curious about how Bitcoin got here, and what the maximalists believe, this conversation is for you.</p><p><br>Disclaimer: The content in this podcast is for entertainment purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Always do your own research.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:53:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c344c75f/e6443221.mp3" length="58584825" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2928</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this end-of-year episode, Brian and Mik explore the evolution of Bitcoin—from its mysterious beginnings with Satoshi Nakamoto’s 2008 white paper to its current six-figure price. They discuss how Bitcoin’s role has shifted from “electronic cash” to a potential reserve asset, the concept of “digital real estate,” and whether it truly lives up to its promise of decentralization. They also discuss skepticism by prominent figures like Charlie Munger and Jamie Dimon, debate energy usage, and consider Bitcoin’s ongoing risk from governments and regulatory bodies. If you’re curious about how Bitcoin got here, and what the maximalists believe, this conversation is for you.</p><p><br>Disclaimer: The content in this podcast is for entertainment purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Always do your own research.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Outside</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Intel Outside</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1472c20-e158-482c-9c99-6f54b69ca4c7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/fa5117e3</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we unpack the latest developments at Intel following the sudden resignation of CEO Pat Gelsinger. </p><p><br>In this Theory Of The Trade (TOTT) episode, we recount why Mik initially started investing in Intel when Pat Gelsinger rejoined the company (~ February 2021) and why he is now cutting his exposure to the stock, given the uncertainty overhang after Pat’s departure. </p><p><br>We explore Intel’s storied past—from the 386/486 “glory days” to missed opportunities in mobile—and dissect whether Intel can reclaim its position as a leading-edge semiconductor manufacturer or if this is the beginning of the end of this legendary American Silicon Valley company.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we unpack the latest developments at Intel following the sudden resignation of CEO Pat Gelsinger. </p><p><br>In this Theory Of The Trade (TOTT) episode, we recount why Mik initially started investing in Intel when Pat Gelsinger rejoined the company (~ February 2021) and why he is now cutting his exposure to the stock, given the uncertainty overhang after Pat’s departure. </p><p><br>We explore Intel’s storied past—from the 386/486 “glory days” to missed opportunities in mobile—and dissect whether Intel can reclaim its position as a leading-edge semiconductor manufacturer or if this is the beginning of the end of this legendary American Silicon Valley company.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:29:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/fa5117e3/713f961a.mp3" length="40470965" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2023</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we unpack the latest developments at Intel following the sudden resignation of CEO Pat Gelsinger. </p><p><br>In this Theory Of The Trade (TOTT) episode, we recount why Mik initially started investing in Intel when Pat Gelsinger rejoined the company (~ February 2021) and why he is now cutting his exposure to the stock, given the uncertainty overhang after Pat’s departure. </p><p><br>We explore Intel’s storied past—from the 386/486 “glory days” to missed opportunities in mobile—and dissect whether Intel can reclaim its position as a leading-edge semiconductor manufacturer or if this is the beginning of the end of this legendary American Silicon Valley company.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Theory Of The Case:  IonQ</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Theory Of The Case:  IonQ</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29fdf4d2-b250-4cb9-aadb-2614b13a107e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/28e0a1e4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on IonQ (IONQ). </p><p><br></p><p>In TOTC episodes, we have an open-ended discussion on an investment that we are beginning to research. We dive into the fundamentals, the opportunity, and ultimately whether we believe there is a good investment thesis.  </p><p><br></p><p>IonQ is one of the few pure play quantum compute companies.  IonQ is working on developing and scaling general purpose quantum compute. In this episode we discuss what is quantum compute, potential use cases for quantum compute.   </p><p><br></p><p>We explore some parallels between quantum compute and GPU compute and Nvidia ~2009-2011.     We discuss some of IonQ’s promising partnerships, the Quibtek acquisition and some promising new quantum networking products that IonQ is looking to launch.</p><p><br></p><p>We recorded this episode on 15th November 2024 when IonQ was breaking through new all-time-highs and we discuss both the opportunities and risks involved in investing in IonQ at the current valuation.   </p><p><br></p><p> (<a href="https://youtu.be/Xn1EsFe7snQ?si=rJ37685N3qpEzCCO">This Jensen Huang talk </a>we reference, to draw out the GPU parallel in the episode is 13 years old and speaks to a vision of GPU Compute at ~40 minutes in)</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on IonQ (IONQ). </p><p><br></p><p>In TOTC episodes, we have an open-ended discussion on an investment that we are beginning to research. We dive into the fundamentals, the opportunity, and ultimately whether we believe there is a good investment thesis.  </p><p><br></p><p>IonQ is one of the few pure play quantum compute companies.  IonQ is working on developing and scaling general purpose quantum compute. In this episode we discuss what is quantum compute, potential use cases for quantum compute.   </p><p><br></p><p>We explore some parallels between quantum compute and GPU compute and Nvidia ~2009-2011.     We discuss some of IonQ’s promising partnerships, the Quibtek acquisition and some promising new quantum networking products that IonQ is looking to launch.</p><p><br></p><p>We recorded this episode on 15th November 2024 when IonQ was breaking through new all-time-highs and we discuss both the opportunities and risks involved in investing in IonQ at the current valuation.   </p><p><br></p><p> (<a href="https://youtu.be/Xn1EsFe7snQ?si=rJ37685N3qpEzCCO">This Jensen Huang talk </a>we reference, to draw out the GPU parallel in the episode is 13 years old and speaks to a vision of GPU Compute at ~40 minutes in)</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:53:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/28e0a1e4/b7b58008.mp3" length="44886716" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2243</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on IonQ (IONQ). </p><p><br></p><p>In TOTC episodes, we have an open-ended discussion on an investment that we are beginning to research. We dive into the fundamentals, the opportunity, and ultimately whether we believe there is a good investment thesis.  </p><p><br></p><p>IonQ is one of the few pure play quantum compute companies.  IonQ is working on developing and scaling general purpose quantum compute. In this episode we discuss what is quantum compute, potential use cases for quantum compute.   </p><p><br></p><p>We explore some parallels between quantum compute and GPU compute and Nvidia ~2009-2011.     We discuss some of IonQ’s promising partnerships, the Quibtek acquisition and some promising new quantum networking products that IonQ is looking to launch.</p><p><br></p><p>We recorded this episode on 15th November 2024 when IonQ was breaking through new all-time-highs and we discuss both the opportunities and risks involved in investing in IonQ at the current valuation.   </p><p><br></p><p> (<a href="https://youtu.be/Xn1EsFe7snQ?si=rJ37685N3qpEzCCO">This Jensen Huang talk </a>we reference, to draw out the GPU parallel in the episode is 13 years old and speaks to a vision of GPU Compute at ~40 minutes in)</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>IONQ, Peter Chapman, Quantum Compute, Quantum Networking, Qubit, GPU Compute</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Betting Markets, Polls and Bias from Elections 2024</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Betting Markets, Polls and Bias from Elections 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">96fa0f95-ca7b-4736-9555-afc35bef3c80</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3abccad8</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>,  we unpack the outcome of the 2024 elections from a betting market, polling data, and what biases might explain what made them get the odds on the outcome quite wrong.</p><p><br></p><p>We touch on topics like the wisdom of crowds, the efficient market hypothesis, and how these new betting markets could hedge traditional financial markets. We discuss whether betting on elections is a legitimate hedging tool or just a gamified gamble. </p><p><br>We discuss what may have driven poll bias. How analyst predictions for a very tight race may have impacted betting markets.  We also discuss how this led to a disconnect that resulted in betting market odds, which had 75/25 odds in favor of Kamala winning the popular vote.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>,  we unpack the outcome of the 2024 elections from a betting market, polling data, and what biases might explain what made them get the odds on the outcome quite wrong.</p><p><br></p><p>We touch on topics like the wisdom of crowds, the efficient market hypothesis, and how these new betting markets could hedge traditional financial markets. We discuss whether betting on elections is a legitimate hedging tool or just a gamified gamble. </p><p><br>We discuss what may have driven poll bias. How analyst predictions for a very tight race may have impacted betting markets.  We also discuss how this led to a disconnect that resulted in betting market odds, which had 75/25 odds in favor of Kamala winning the popular vote.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:15:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3abccad8/50976014.mp3" length="45129155" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2255</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>,  we unpack the outcome of the 2024 elections from a betting market, polling data, and what biases might explain what made them get the odds on the outcome quite wrong.</p><p><br></p><p>We touch on topics like the wisdom of crowds, the efficient market hypothesis, and how these new betting markets could hedge traditional financial markets. We discuss whether betting on elections is a legitimate hedging tool or just a gamified gamble. </p><p><br>We discuss what may have driven poll bias. How analyst predictions for a very tight race may have impacted betting markets.  We also discuss how this led to a disconnect that resulted in betting market odds, which had 75/25 odds in favor of Kamala winning the popular vote.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>betting market, polymarket, polygon,elections, polling data, efficient market hypothesis</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Theory Of The Case:  Viking Therapeutics VKTX</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Theory Of The Case:  Viking Therapeutics VKTX</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50f819fa-4291-4a40-a02d-55752d505b0c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/3c8540e6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on Viking Therapeutics (VKTX). </p><p>In TOTC episodes, we have an open-ended discussion on an investment that we are beginning to research. We dive into the fundamentals, the opportunity, and ultimately whether we believe there is a good investment thesis.  </p><p>Viking Therapeutics (VKTX) has become a fast follower in the rapidly growing GLP-1/obesity drug market. We discuss the current state of play of VK-2735 research and Phase 2/3 studies.  We discuss the potential addressable market for GLP-1 drugs in the obesity and diabetes markets.  We review why the delivery mechanism may be an important driver in the thesis to invest in VKTX (or its competitors).  We discuss the company's capitalization and how the CEO's stewardship (Brian Lian) may be well-positioned to take Viking to the next stage.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on Viking Therapeutics (VKTX). </p><p>In TOTC episodes, we have an open-ended discussion on an investment that we are beginning to research. We dive into the fundamentals, the opportunity, and ultimately whether we believe there is a good investment thesis.  </p><p>Viking Therapeutics (VKTX) has become a fast follower in the rapidly growing GLP-1/obesity drug market. We discuss the current state of play of VK-2735 research and Phase 2/3 studies.  We discuss the potential addressable market for GLP-1 drugs in the obesity and diabetes markets.  We review why the delivery mechanism may be an important driver in the thesis to invest in VKTX (or its competitors).  We discuss the company's capitalization and how the CEO's stewardship (Brian Lian) may be well-positioned to take Viking to the next stage.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:25:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/3c8540e6/0b85cbdd.mp3" length="55836221" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2791</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we develop our Theory Of The Case (TOTC) on Viking Therapeutics (VKTX). </p><p>In TOTC episodes, we have an open-ended discussion on an investment that we are beginning to research. We dive into the fundamentals, the opportunity, and ultimately whether we believe there is a good investment thesis.  </p><p>Viking Therapeutics (VKTX) has become a fast follower in the rapidly growing GLP-1/obesity drug market. We discuss the current state of play of VK-2735 research and Phase 2/3 studies.  We discuss the potential addressable market for GLP-1 drugs in the obesity and diabetes markets.  We review why the delivery mechanism may be an important driver in the thesis to invest in VKTX (or its competitors).  We discuss the company's capitalization and how the CEO's stewardship (Brian Lian) may be well-positioned to take Viking to the next stage.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>VKTX,  Viking Therapeutics,  VK-2735, GLP-1 Drugs,  Biotech,  Pharma</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Over-Indexing in Investing</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title> Over-Indexing in Investing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">483467ce-611b-4b00-aa35-4111fd5eaae6</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/029b953e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we kick off Q42024 with a chat about market indices and the pros and cons of index funds.  </p><p>We discuss index funds and how Vanguard / Jack Bogle started a trend toward low-cost index funds. We discuss active management as compared with passive index fund investing. We discuss the incentives in fund management that drive asset managers to end up with diversified asset allocations that are closely correlated with indices. We challenge the conventional wisdom of "set it and forget it" indexing and diversified portfolios and highlight the benefits of having a concentrated portfolio (a la Buffet / Munger) when you have high-conviction ideas.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we kick off Q42024 with a chat about market indices and the pros and cons of index funds.  </p><p>We discuss index funds and how Vanguard / Jack Bogle started a trend toward low-cost index funds. We discuss active management as compared with passive index fund investing. We discuss the incentives in fund management that drive asset managers to end up with diversified asset allocations that are closely correlated with indices. We challenge the conventional wisdom of "set it and forget it" indexing and diversified portfolios and highlight the benefits of having a concentrated portfolio (a la Buffet / Munger) when you have high-conviction ideas.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:10:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/029b953e/046384d4.mp3" length="38256840" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1912</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, we kick off Q42024 with a chat about market indices and the pros and cons of index funds.  </p><p>We discuss index funds and how Vanguard / Jack Bogle started a trend toward low-cost index funds. We discuss active management as compared with passive index fund investing. We discuss the incentives in fund management that drive asset managers to end up with diversified asset allocations that are closely correlated with indices. We challenge the conventional wisdom of "set it and forget it" indexing and diversified portfolios and highlight the benefits of having a concentrated portfolio (a la Buffet / Munger) when you have high-conviction ideas.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Index Funds,  Active Management, Diversification, Buffet, Munger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Risk and Position Sizing</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Risk and Position Sizing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42e9d42e-4c65-4308-a906-7adfdde0f142</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d4d85438</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik discuss the nuances of risk management in investing, the role of position sizing, and the pros and cons of using leverage. They share personal stories and frameworks for understanding risk, explore the balance between diversification and concentration, and provide practical tips on how to approach investments with a thoughtful mindset.  They draw from legendary investors like Charlie Munger/Warren Buffet and Nomad Capital (Nick Sleep).</p><p>References:<br><a href="https://igyfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Full_Collection_Nomad_Letters_.pdf"><br>Full Collection of Nomad Capital Letters</a> (Nick Sleep Letters)<br><a href="https://www.founderspodcast.com/episodes/365-nick-sleeps-letters-the-full-collection-of-the-nomad-investment-partnership-letters-to-partners">Founders Podcast - Nick Sleep Letters<br></a><a href="https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/charlie-munger">Acquired Podcast - Charlie Munger<br></a><br></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik discuss the nuances of risk management in investing, the role of position sizing, and the pros and cons of using leverage. They share personal stories and frameworks for understanding risk, explore the balance between diversification and concentration, and provide practical tips on how to approach investments with a thoughtful mindset.  They draw from legendary investors like Charlie Munger/Warren Buffet and Nomad Capital (Nick Sleep).</p><p>References:<br><a href="https://igyfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Full_Collection_Nomad_Letters_.pdf"><br>Full Collection of Nomad Capital Letters</a> (Nick Sleep Letters)<br><a href="https://www.founderspodcast.com/episodes/365-nick-sleeps-letters-the-full-collection-of-the-nomad-investment-partnership-letters-to-partners">Founders Podcast - Nick Sleep Letters<br></a><a href="https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/charlie-munger">Acquired Podcast - Charlie Munger<br></a><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:59:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d4d85438/42c3fab6.mp3" length="54075547" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2703</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik discuss the nuances of risk management in investing, the role of position sizing, and the pros and cons of using leverage. They share personal stories and frameworks for understanding risk, explore the balance between diversification and concentration, and provide practical tips on how to approach investments with a thoughtful mindset.  They draw from legendary investors like Charlie Munger/Warren Buffet and Nomad Capital (Nick Sleep).</p><p>References:<br><a href="https://igyfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Full_Collection_Nomad_Letters_.pdf"><br>Full Collection of Nomad Capital Letters</a> (Nick Sleep Letters)<br><a href="https://www.founderspodcast.com/episodes/365-nick-sleeps-letters-the-full-collection-of-the-nomad-investment-partnership-letters-to-partners">Founders Podcast - Nick Sleep Letters<br></a><a href="https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/charlie-munger">Acquired Podcast - Charlie Munger<br></a><br></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do CEOs matter?</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Do CEOs matter?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e137bbea-66ea-4c34-b901-306507dc76ef</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/1d05bc59</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Summary:</strong> In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik discuss the role of CEOs in determining the success of companies. They explore whether a CEO's leadership matters more than the industry's inherent economics. Drawing parallels with iconic leaders like Steve Jobs, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg, the discussion highlights how different leadership styles impact innovation, company culture, and strategic decision-making. The conversation also touches on investment strategies and the importance of understanding business fundamentals and leadership quality when evaluating potential investments.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Summary:</strong> In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik discuss the role of CEOs in determining the success of companies. They explore whether a CEO's leadership matters more than the industry's inherent economics. Drawing parallels with iconic leaders like Steve Jobs, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg, the discussion highlights how different leadership styles impact innovation, company culture, and strategic decision-making. The conversation also touches on investment strategies and the importance of understanding business fundamentals and leadership quality when evaluating potential investments.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/1d05bc59/b423a28a.mp3" length="40763538" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2037</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Summary:</strong> In this episode of <em>FOMO Investing</em>, Brian and Mik discuss the role of CEOs in determining the success of companies. They explore whether a CEO's leadership matters more than the industry's inherent economics. Drawing parallels with iconic leaders like Steve Jobs, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg, the discussion highlights how different leadership styles impact innovation, company culture, and strategic decision-making. The conversation also touches on investment strategies and the importance of understanding business fundamentals and leadership quality when evaluating potential investments.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FOMO Investing Intro</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>FOMO Investing Intro</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d359ff2-18d2-4cb1-9395-a7dbabcd1290</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/5456405b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Mik and Brian discuss the concept of FOMO investing and how to develop a principled approach to investing. They explore the current state of the market, the valuation of tech stocks, and the significance of Warren Buffett's decision to reduce his exposure to Apple. They also touch on the topics of AI, compute, and the potential opportunities and risks they present. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding one's edge as an investor, recognizing the difference between a great business and a great investment, and being comfortable with the ups and downs of the market.</p><p><strong>Takeaways</strong><br>Develop a principled approach to investing and know yourself as an investor.<br>Understand the difference between a great business and a great investment.<br>Recognize the potential opportunities and risks in emerging technologies like AI and compute.<br>Be comfortable with the ups and downs of the market and avoid chasing what's hot.<br>Consider your edge as an investor and focus on areas where you have knowledge and interest.</p><p><br><strong>Sound Bites</strong><br>"Should I cut some of my exposure to the market? Call it maybe a bit of FOMO."</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Mik and Brian discuss the concept of FOMO investing and how to develop a principled approach to investing. They explore the current state of the market, the valuation of tech stocks, and the significance of Warren Buffett's decision to reduce his exposure to Apple. They also touch on the topics of AI, compute, and the potential opportunities and risks they present. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding one's edge as an investor, recognizing the difference between a great business and a great investment, and being comfortable with the ups and downs of the market.</p><p><strong>Takeaways</strong><br>Develop a principled approach to investing and know yourself as an investor.<br>Understand the difference between a great business and a great investment.<br>Recognize the potential opportunities and risks in emerging technologies like AI and compute.<br>Be comfortable with the ups and downs of the market and avoid chasing what's hot.<br>Consider your edge as an investor and focus on areas where you have knowledge and interest.</p><p><br><strong>Sound Bites</strong><br>"Should I cut some of my exposure to the market? Call it maybe a bit of FOMO."</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 16:46:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian and Mik</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/5456405b/08455479.mp3" length="28757728" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Brian and Mik</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1796</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Mik and Brian discuss the concept of FOMO investing and how to develop a principled approach to investing. They explore the current state of the market, the valuation of tech stocks, and the significance of Warren Buffett's decision to reduce his exposure to Apple. They also touch on the topics of AI, compute, and the potential opportunities and risks they present. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding one's edge as an investor, recognizing the difference between a great business and a great investment, and being comfortable with the ups and downs of the market.</p><p><strong>Takeaways</strong><br>Develop a principled approach to investing and know yourself as an investor.<br>Understand the difference between a great business and a great investment.<br>Recognize the potential opportunities and risks in emerging technologies like AI and compute.<br>Be comfortable with the ups and downs of the market and avoid chasing what's hot.<br>Consider your edge as an investor and focus on areas where you have knowledge and interest.</p><p><br><strong>Sound Bites</strong><br>"Should I cut some of my exposure to the market? Call it maybe a bit of FOMO."</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>FOMO investing, market valuation, tech stocks, Warren Buffett, Apple, AI, compute, investment approach</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:chapters url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/5456405b/chapters.json" type="application/json+chapters"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
