<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/flg-insights" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>FLG Disability Insights</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/flg-insights</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>FLG Disability Insights from Feden Law Group delivers short, practical briefings on disability benefits, ERISA insurance disputes, and Social Security federal appeals. Nicholas Feden explains what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters. Explore the full case analyses at FedenLawGroup.com, and try FLG Case Analyst Beta for a full AI-generated report from an attorney-trained, cutting-edge model. General information, not individual legal advice.</description>
    <copyright>© 2026 Feden Law Group PLLC</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>bd827f1d-79d9-5f1a-8ef4-fa86b9d72b6e</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:00:14 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:01:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Education"/>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden — Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistorcdn.com/52Hyl1dL4L-5Gn1kukJIVR22FzJnO6IUcOG2RZSYKz4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83Njc0/MGQzMDNmZTM1ZjA3/NjJiNDdmNzRhZmY1/YjNjMS5wbmc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>FLG Disability Insights from Feden Law Group delivers short, practical briefings on disability benefits, ERISA insurance disputes, and Social Security federal appeals. Nicholas Feden explains what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters. Explore the full case analyses at FedenLawGroup.com, and try FLG Case Analyst Beta for a full AI-generated report from an attorney-trained, cutting-edge model. General information, not individual legal advice.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>FLG Disability Insights from Feden Law Group delivers short, practical briefings on disability benefits, ERISA insurance disputes, and Social Security federal appeals.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>ERISA,disability benefits,long-term disability,short-term disability,Social Security,insurance claims,Feden Law Group</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Feden Law Group PLLC</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>nfeden@fedenlawgroup.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>When Speaking Limits Define an ERISA Disability Dispute</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When Speaking Limits Define an ERISA Disability Dispute</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64e423e8-0def-4da6-bb6b-c395eae833d2</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/krambeck-unum-speaking-limits-erisa-disability/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A disability dispute turned on whether the claimant could speak for only a few minutes or for hours during a workday. Nick explains why the court denied summary judgment, how the policy’s history affected de novo review, and why functional evidence must match the work’s real speaking demands.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/krambeck-unum-speaking-limits-erisa-disability/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A disability dispute turned on whether the claimant could speak for only a few minutes or for hours during a workday. Nick explains why the court denied summary judgment, how the policy’s history affected de novo review, and why functional evidence must match the work’s real speaking demands.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/krambeck-unum-speaking-limits-erisa-disability/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/797f1155/afba76aa.mp3" length="2970065" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>184</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A disability dispute turned on whether the claimant could speak for only a few minutes or for hours during a workday. Nick explains why the court denied summary judgment, how the policy’s history affected de novo review, and why functional evidence must match the work’s real speaking demands.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A disability dispute turned on whether the claimant could speak for only a few minutes or for hours during a workday. Nick explains why the court denied summary judgment, how the policy’s history affected de novo review, and why functional evidence must m</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/797f1155/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a Partner’s Statement Can Change an SSDI Appeal</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why a Partner’s Statement Can Change an SSDI Appeal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5501cece-4cc1-4f0c-b57f-b2aa64c78783</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssdi-appeal-partner-statement-fain/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A partner described slow chores and severe limitations during fibromyalgia flares, but the administrative decision gave no reason for rejecting that account. Nick explains the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, the remand, and how firsthand observations can make lay evidence useful.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssdi-appeal-partner-statement-fain/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A partner described slow chores and severe limitations during fibromyalgia flares, but the administrative decision gave no reason for rejecting that account. Nick explains the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, the remand, and how firsthand observations can make lay evidence useful.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssdi-appeal-partner-statement-fain/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/aae5619f/24e287a0.mp3" length="2947127" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>183</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A partner described slow chores and severe limitations during fibromyalgia flares, but the administrative decision gave no reason for rejecting that account. Nick explains the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, the remand, and how firsthand observations can make lay evidence useful.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A partner described slow chores and severe limitations during fibromyalgia flares, but the administrative decision gave no reason for rejecting that account. Nick explains the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, the remand, and how firsthand observations can make lay</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/aae5619f/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a Later Diagnosis May Not Prove Past Work Limitations</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why a Later Diagnosis May Not Prove Past Work Limitations</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6a55fc1-3eb5-4748-8c15-3e58b0b44cc0</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/syed-unum-later-diagnosis-disability-work-limitations/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A corporate lawyer’s later diagnoses did not persuade the court that she was disabled when Unum ended her benefits. Nick explains the de novo ruling and why medical evidence must connect the condition to the disputed dates and the claimant’s actual occupational duties.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/syed-unum-later-diagnosis-disability-work-limitations/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A corporate lawyer’s later diagnoses did not persuade the court that she was disabled when Unum ended her benefits. Nick explains the de novo ruling and why medical evidence must connect the condition to the disputed dates and the claimant’s actual occupational duties.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/syed-unum-later-diagnosis-disability-work-limitations/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/073d771e/708438bb.mp3" length="3091692" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>192</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A corporate lawyer’s later diagnoses did not persuade the court that she was disabled when Unum ended her benefits. Nick explains the de novo ruling and why medical evidence must connect the condition to the disputed dates and the claimant’s actual occupational duties.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A corporate lawyer’s later diagnoses did not persuade the court that she was disabled when Unum ended her benefits. Nick explains the de novo ruling and why medical evidence must connect the condition to the disputed dates and the claimant’s actual occupa</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/073d771e/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When a Missing Hearing Transcript Undermines an SSDI Denial</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When a Missing Hearing Transcript Undermines an SSDI Denial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fec548c-d367-4a2b-a50a-353740614dff</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/missing-hearing-transcript-ssdi-denial-ball-bisignano/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A missing Social Security hearing recording left the reviewing court unable to assess testimony used in an SSDI denial. Nick explains why the court ordered further proceedings, what the agency must do next, and how claimants can connect an incomplete record to a specific functional finding.<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/missing-hearing-transcript-ssdi-denial-ball-bisignano/"></a></p><p>Read the article<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"></a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A missing Social Security hearing recording left the reviewing court unable to assess testimony used in an SSDI denial. Nick explains why the court ordered further proceedings, what the agency must do next, and how claimants can connect an incomplete record to a specific functional finding.<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/missing-hearing-transcript-ssdi-denial-ball-bisignano/"></a></p><p>Read the article<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"></a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/33fc2b20/ccf06858.mp3" length="2971322" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>184</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A missing Social Security hearing recording left the reviewing court unable to assess testimony used in an SSDI denial. Nick explains why the court ordered further proceedings, what the agency must do next, and how claimants can connect an incomplete record to a specific functional finding.<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/missing-hearing-transcript-ssdi-denial-ball-bisignano/"></a></p><p>Read the article<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"></a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,Social Security,disability benefits,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/33fc2b20/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hartford Any-Occupation Review: Deadlines, Job Demands, and the Appeal Record</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Hartford Any-Occupation Review: Deadlines, Job Demands, and the Appeal Record</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b2c7d7f-0e0e-43a1-b2db-c9c0a153a0bd</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/hartford-any-occupation-review-job-demands-appeal-records/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Hartford any-occupation ruling illustrates how appeal deadlines, preserved submission records, realistic training assumptions, and the fit between medical restrictions and proposed job demands can shape review.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/hartford-any-occupation-review-job-demands-appeal-records/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Hartford any-occupation ruling illustrates how appeal deadlines, preserved submission records, realistic training assumptions, and the fit between medical restrictions and proposed job demands can shape review.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/hartford-any-occupation-review-job-demands-appeal-records/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ef175af9/46f8ae68.mp3" length="2961309" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>184</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A Hartford any-occupation ruling illustrates how appeal deadlines, preserved submission records, realistic training assumptions, and the fit between medical restrictions and proposed job demands can shape review.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Hartford any-occupation ruling illustrates how appeal deadlines, preserved submission records, realistic training assumptions, and the fit between medical restrictions and proposed job demands can shape review.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ef175af9/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When an SSDI Work-Capacity Finding Lacks the Functional Evidence</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When an SSDI Work-Capacity Finding Lacks the Functional Evidence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2dc5c57-80ac-455e-9472-5cb1d01cc7d9</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssdi-remand-missing-functional-assessment-griffin/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A federal SSDI remand highlights the difference between medical findings and evidence that explains a claimant’s functional ability to meet the demands of sustained work.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssdi-remand-missing-functional-assessment-griffin/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A federal SSDI remand highlights the difference between medical findings and evidence that explains a claimant’s functional ability to meet the demands of sustained work.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssdi-remand-missing-functional-assessment-griffin/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6e49c765/09fe334a.mp3" length="2798710" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>174</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A federal SSDI remand highlights the difference between medical findings and evidence that explains a claimant’s functional ability to meet the demands of sustained work.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A federal SSDI remand highlights the difference between medical findings and evidence that explains a claimant’s functional ability to meet the demands of sustained work.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/6e49c765/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Lost Income Wasn’t Enough for Provident Partial Disability Benefits</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Lost Income Wasn’t Enough for Provident Partial Disability Benefits</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63d1c9b9-1498-4bd2-9c38-9f1a8341d08a</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/whitlock-provident-partial-disability-income-loss-occupational-evidence/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Provident partial-disability decision shows why a substantial income loss may still fall short when the record does not connect medical restrictions to the material duties and sustained demands of the insured occupation.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/whitlock-provident-partial-disability-income-loss-occupational-evidence/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Provident partial-disability decision shows why a substantial income loss may still fall short when the record does not connect medical restrictions to the material duties and sustained demands of the insured occupation.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/whitlock-provident-partial-disability-income-loss-occupational-evidence/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/041b431b/1fceba31.mp3" length="2706421" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>168</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A Provident partial-disability decision shows why a substantial income loss may still fall short when the record does not connect medical restrictions to the material duties and sustained demands of the insured occupation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Provident partial-disability decision shows why a substantial income loss may still fall short when the record does not connect medical restrictions to the material duties and sustained demands of the insured occupation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/041b431b/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Stable Mental Health Notes May Not Answer the Work Question</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Why Stable Mental Health Notes May Not Answer the Work Question</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93d75945-5ad1-4e32-ad69-10c72a3e05d7</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssi-appeal-stable-mental-health-workplace-function-charles-k/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A New Jersey SSI appeal examines why positive mental health observations still require a clear explanation of what a claimant can sustain under the specific demands of a workplace.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssi-appeal-stable-mental-health-workplace-function-charles-k/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A New Jersey SSI appeal examines why positive mental health observations still require a clear explanation of what a claimant can sustain under the specific demands of a workplace.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/ssi-appeal-stable-mental-health-workplace-function-charles-k/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/65c33558/575e762b.mp3" length="2891914" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>179</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A New Jersey SSI appeal examines why positive mental health observations still require a clear explanation of what a claimant can sustain under the specific demands of a workplace.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A New Jersey SSI appeal examines why positive mental health observations still require a clear explanation of what a claimant can sustain under the specific demands of a workplace.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/65c33558/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When an ERISA Claim Dispute Reaches Beyond the Claim File</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When an ERISA Claim Dispute Reaches Beyond the Claim File</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e00a53ac-d386-4a82-934e-00638fab28d0</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/gibson-unum-erisa-disability-fiduciary-duty-discovery/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Minnesota ERISA ruling allowed focused discovery on a separately pleaded fiduciary-duty claim involving an allegedly inaccurate account of a doctor conversation, while leaving the benefits record and merits unresolved.<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/gibson-unum-erisa-disability-fiduciary-duty-discovery/"></a></p><p>Read the article<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"></a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Minnesota ERISA ruling allowed focused discovery on a separately pleaded fiduciary-duty claim involving an allegedly inaccurate account of a doctor conversation, while leaving the benefits record and merits unresolved.<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/gibson-unum-erisa-disability-fiduciary-duty-discovery/"></a></p><p>Read the article<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"></a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0fc14d81/c698fb56.mp3" length="2888146" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>179</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Minnesota ERISA ruling allowed focused discovery on a separately pleaded fiduciary-duty claim involving an allegedly inaccurate account of a doctor conversation, while leaving the benefits record and merits unresolved.<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/gibson-unum-erisa-disability-fiduciary-duty-discovery/"></a></p><p>Read the article<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"></a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/0fc14d81/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When Simple Work Doesn’t Explain a Two-Step Task Limit</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>When Simple Work Doesn’t Explain a Two-Step Task Limit</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db7c8e1e-dcc5-4aa0-81f8-c2ca0c19bc0e</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/rayner-ssdi-ssi-one-two-step-limit-reasoning-level-two-remand/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Social Security court explains why labeling work simple did not resolve an omitted one- and two-step task restriction, and why the gap required a new hearing rather than an award of benefits.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/rayner-ssdi-ssi-one-two-step-limit-reasoning-level-two-remand/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A Social Security court explains why labeling work simple did not resolve an omitted one- and two-step task restriction, and why the gap required a new hearing rather than an award of benefits.</p><p><a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/rayner-ssdi-ssi-one-two-step-limit-reasoning-level-two-remand/">Read the article</a></p><p><a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/">Try FLG Case Analyst Beta</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:38:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/2c435238/7e02faca.mp3" length="2626975" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>163</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A Social Security court explains why labeling work simple did not resolve an omitted one- and two-step task restriction, and why the gap required a new hearing rather than an award of benefits.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Social Security court explains why labeling work simple did not resolve an omitted one- and two-step task restriction, and why the gap required a new hearing rather than an award of benefits.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,FLG Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/2c435238/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Signing an Employment Release? Protect Your Disability Claim</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Signing an Employment Release? Protect Your Disability Claim</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ccb69a57-31e7-4fa3-a5ef-cd41fefec8c5</guid>
      <link>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/cude-wells-fargo-short-term-disability-employment-release-2026/</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>An employment settlement and a disability appeal can overlap. Nick Feden explains what Cude v. Lincoln National teaches about release language and timing—and why the ruling did not award disability benefits.</p><p>Read the article:<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/cude-wells-fargo-short-term-disability-employment-release-2026/"><br>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/cude-wells-fargo-short-term-disability-employment-release-2026/</a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta:<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"><br>https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>An employment settlement and a disability appeal can overlap. Nick Feden explains what Cude v. Lincoln National teaches about release language and timing—and why the ruling did not award disability benefits.</p><p>Read the article:<a href="https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/cude-wells-fargo-short-term-disability-employment-release-2026/"><br>https://fedenlawgroup.com/insights/cude-wells-fargo-short-term-disability-employment-release-2026/</a></p><p>Try FLG Case Analyst Beta:<a href="https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/"><br>https://flg-case-analyst-intake.nfeden.workers.dev/</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:46:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ab2527bf/95a8ae21.mp3" length="2791183" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Nicholas Feden, Feden Law Group</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>173</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An employment settlement and a disability appeal can overlap. Nick Feden explains what Cude v. Lincoln National teaches about release language and timing—and why the ruling did not award disability benefits.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An employment settlement and a disability appeal can overlap. Nick Feden explains what Cude v. Lincoln National teaches about release language and timing—and why the ruling did not award disability benefits.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>Feden Law Group,FLG Disability Insights,ERISA,disability benefits,Social Security,FLG Case Analyst Beta</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://share.transistor.fm/s/ab2527bf/transcript.txt" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
