<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/deakinstruction" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>Deakinstruction</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/deakinstruction</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Surprising, challenging, and provocative conversations from the Philosophy and History of Ideas research team at Deakin University, Australia</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2019 All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>7bca489c-2a6d-5423-ab58-9c6707add138</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked owner="patrick.stokes@deakin.edu.au">no</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:35:00 +1000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:59:43 +1100</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://deakinstruction.podbean.com</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/mE96O8-FHNF35WG5AQoaJGCObomjfHt6b75pbOzdeKU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQ2ODQzLzE2OTk4/NDY3MTktYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Surprising, challenging, and provocative conversations from the Philosophy and History of Ideas research team at Deakin University, Australia</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Surprising, challenging, and provocative conversations from the Philosophy and History of Ideas research team at Deakin University, Australia.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>patrick.stokes@deakin.edu.au</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 10: Deleuze, Digital Media &amp; Thought: A Conversation with Tim Deane-Freeman</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 10: Deleuze, Digital Media &amp; Thought: A Conversation with Tim Deane-Freeman</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dac30f7b-4f71-47c1-965c-b5157ce94d19</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/d0c61581</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tim Deane-Freeman talks to Meg McCamley and Tim Neal about his new book Deleuze, Digital Media &amp; Thought, which places Deleuze’s philosophy in dialogue with both cinema and the concept of information. In this context, they discuss philosophy, film, TV and social control, and the broader challenge of embracing a kind of thought which eschews recognition in order to confront the radically new. Tim Deane-Freeman is a sessional lecturer in philosophy at Deakin, and Meg McCamley and Tim Neal are both Deakin PhD candidates.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tim Deane-Freeman talks to Meg McCamley and Tim Neal about his new book Deleuze, Digital Media &amp; Thought, which places Deleuze’s philosophy in dialogue with both cinema and the concept of information. In this context, they discuss philosophy, film, TV and social control, and the broader challenge of embracing a kind of thought which eschews recognition in order to confront the radically new. Tim Deane-Freeman is a sessional lecturer in philosophy at Deakin, and Meg McCamley and Tim Neal are both Deakin PhD candidates.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:55:35 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/d0c61581/0d960c9d.mp3" length="61709884" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2568</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tim Deane-Freeman talks to Meg McCamley and Tim Neal about his new book Deleuze, Digital Media &amp; Thought, which places Deleuze’s philosophy in dialogue with both cinema and the concept of information. In this context, they discuss philosophy, film, TV and social control, and the broader challenge of embracing a kind of thought which eschews recognition in order to confront the radically new. Tim Deane-Freeman is a sessional lecturer in philosophy at Deakin, and Meg McCamley and Tim Neal are both Deakin PhD candidates.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Deleuze, philosophy, cinema, digital media, Tim Deane-Freeman, Meg McCamley, Tim Neal</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 9: AI and the Future of Philosophical Labour</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 9: AI and the Future of Philosophical Labour</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c095c0c9-f93a-44e6-baf6-0901d529e795</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b47d2071</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Where does the emergence of AI technology leave philosophers - as teachers, as researchers, and as practitioners of philosophy? This roundtable discussion held in May 2024 explores these key questions. Features Christopher Mayes (Deakin), Thomas Corbin (Macquarie), Marilyn Stendera (Wollongong), and Jean-Philippe Deranty (Macquarie).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Where does the emergence of AI technology leave philosophers - as teachers, as researchers, and as practitioners of philosophy? This roundtable discussion held in May 2024 explores these key questions. Features Christopher Mayes (Deakin), Thomas Corbin (Macquarie), Marilyn Stendera (Wollongong), and Jean-Philippe Deranty (Macquarie).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 16:06:29 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b47d2071/2c8dca9c.mp3" length="119892371" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>4994</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Where does the emergence of AI technology leave philosophers - as teachers, as researchers, and as practitioners of philosophy? This roundtable discussion held in May 2024 explores these key questions. Features Christopher Mayes (Deakin), Thomas Corbin (Macquarie), Marilyn Stendera (Wollongong), and Jean-Philippe Deranty (Macquarie).</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, AI</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 8: Hope as a Secular Virtue</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 8: Hope as a Secular Virtue</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/17096ef3-7fe7-58f1-a9b6-836bd4131b04</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/330e63b7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>At a time when we could all use a bit more hope, here's <a href="https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/philosophy/people/academic-staff/robert-stern">Prof. Robert Stern</a> (University of Sheffield) delivering last year's <a href="https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/events/2019-max-charlesworth-lecture">Max Charlesworth Lecture</a>: "Hope Without God: Is Hope a Secular Virtue?"</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>At a time when we could all use a bit more hope, here's <a href="https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/philosophy/people/academic-staff/robert-stern">Prof. Robert Stern</a> (University of Sheffield) delivering last year's <a href="https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/events/2019-max-charlesworth-lecture">Max Charlesworth Lecture</a>: "Hope Without God: Is Hope a Secular Virtue?"</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 17:44:39 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Philosophy @ Deakin</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/330e63b7/455601e5.mp3" length="72636129" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Philosophy @ Deakin</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3026</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At a time when we could all use a bit more hope, here's Prof. Robert Stern (University of Sheffield) delivering last year's Max Charlesworth Lecture: "Hope Without God: Is Hope a Secular Virtue?"</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At a time when we could all use a bit more hope, here's Prof. Robert Stern (University of Sheffield) delivering last year's Max Charlesworth Lecture: "Hope Without God: Is Hope a Secular Virtue?"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 7: What are Peoples?</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 7: What are Peoples?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/episode-5-what-are-peoples-6740242820ec9cf4ccea4f719566a5ea</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4c2b58e7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The role of 'peoples' in global affairs is more pervasive and contested than ever, from issues of indigenous sovereignty to Brexit. But as <a href="https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/people/john-morss">Dr John Morss</a>, Senior Lecturer in Law at Deakin tells A/Prof Patrick Stokes in this wide-ranging discussion, 'peoples' is itself a very contestable idea.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The role of 'peoples' in global affairs is more pervasive and contested than ever, from issues of indigenous sovereignty to Brexit. But as <a href="https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/people/john-morss">Dr John Morss</a>, Senior Lecturer in Law at Deakin tells A/Prof Patrick Stokes in this wide-ranging discussion, 'peoples' is itself a very contestable idea.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:08:59 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4c2b58e7/951baa21.mp3" length="56260600" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2344</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The role of 'peoples' in global affairs is more pervasive and contested than ever, from issues of indigenous sovereignty to Brexit. But as Dr John Morss, Senior Lecturer in Law at Deakin tells A/Prof Patrick Stokes in this wide-ranging discussion, 'peoples' is itself a very contestable idea.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The role of 'peoples' in global affairs is more pervasive and contested than ever, from issues of indigenous sovereignty to Brexit. But as Dr John Morss, Senior Lecturer in Law at Deakin tells A/Prof Patrick Stokes in this wide-ranging discussion, 'people</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 6: Mindfulness and Buddhism</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 6: Mindfulness and Buddhism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/episode-4-mindfulness-and-buddhism-3f8d7f9d2b052c647fbd5e2e159c1878</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b5a93204</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mindfulness is big business these days. But how did a Buddhist practice become so prevalent in contemporary Western life, and just how far has contemporary mindfulness strayed from its Buddhist origins? To find out, A/Prof Patrick Stokes chats with <a href="http://tiny.cc/97olcz">Dr Leesa Davis</a>, lecturer in philosophy at Deakin and author of <em><a href="http://tiny.cc/pcplcz">Advaita Vedanta and Zen Buddhism: Deconstructive Modes of Spiritual Inquiry</a> </em>(2010).</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mindfulness is big business these days. But how did a Buddhist practice become so prevalent in contemporary Western life, and just how far has contemporary mindfulness strayed from its Buddhist origins? To find out, A/Prof Patrick Stokes chats with <a href="http://tiny.cc/97olcz">Dr Leesa Davis</a>, lecturer in philosophy at Deakin and author of <em><a href="http://tiny.cc/pcplcz">Advaita Vedanta and Zen Buddhism: Deconstructive Modes of Spiritual Inquiry</a> </em>(2010).</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:22:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b5a93204/dfb4c9de.mp3" length="37184252" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/uPUVx4KoYYBVsq3DiH1lPY7Zyldv6lQAQFFPo0iVal0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE1OTY5NTUv/MTY5OTg0Njc0NS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1549</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mindfulness is big business these days. But how did a Buddhist practice become so prevalent in contemporary Western life, and just how far has contemporary mindfulness strayed from its Buddhist origins? To find out, A/Prof Patrick Stokes chats with Dr Leesa Davis, lecturer in philosophy at Deakin and author of Advaita Vedanta and Zen Buddhism: Deconstructive Modes of Spiritual Inquiry (2010).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mindfulness is big business these days. But how did a Buddhist practice become so prevalent in contemporary Western life, and just how far has contemporary mindfulness strayed from its Buddhist origins? To find out, A/Prof Patrick Stokes chats with Dr Lee</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deakinstruction special episode: Who Needs the Humanities?</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Deakinstruction special episode: Who Needs the Humanities?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/who-needs-the-humanities-c6cd4e51bd4ad4add83ddc843ed59205</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/144f9e77</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Moderated by Dr Sean Bowden. Speakers:</p>
<ul><li>Prof Aaron Russell, Deakin University</li>
<li>Prof Joy Damousi, University of Melbourne, President, Australian Academy of the Humanities</li>
<li>Prof David Lowe, Deakin University.</li>
<li>Prof Robert Stern, University of Sheffield, former President, British Philosophical Association.</li>
<li>Dr Miriam Bankovsky, La Trobe University.</li>
<li>Dr Emily Potter, Deakin University.</li>
</ul>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Moderated by Dr Sean Bowden. Speakers:</p>
<ul><li>Prof Aaron Russell, Deakin University</li>
<li>Prof Joy Damousi, University of Melbourne, President, Australian Academy of the Humanities</li>
<li>Prof David Lowe, Deakin University.</li>
<li>Prof Robert Stern, University of Sheffield, former President, British Philosophical Association.</li>
<li>Dr Miriam Bankovsky, La Trobe University.</li>
<li>Dr Emily Potter, Deakin University.</li>
</ul>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 18:08:19 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/144f9e77/547043f8.mp3" length="94905556" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>3955</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Moderated by Dr Sean Bowden. Speakers:
Prof Aaron Russell, Deakin University
Prof Joy Damousi, University of Melbourne, President, Australian Academy of the Humanities
Prof David Lowe, Deakin University.
Prof Robert Stern, University of Sheffield, former President, British Philosophical Association.
Dr Miriam Bankovsky, La Trobe University.
Dr Emily Potter, Deakin University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Moderated by Dr Sean Bowden. Speakers:
Prof Aaron Russell, Deakin University
Prof Joy Damousi, University of Melbourne, President, Australian Academy of the Humanities
Prof David Lowe, Deakin University.
Prof Robert Stern, University of Sheffield, former </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 4: Doing Public Philosophy</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 4: Doing Public Philosophy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/deakinstruction-episode-4-doing-public-philosophy-a3919469b23c92b29ec4fec762fc4ab3</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/699120d6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Philosophy has a bad reputation for being stuck in the ivory tower. But just how can you take philosophy down into the marketplace – and what will you find when you get there? On this episode, Dr Valery Vinogradovs shares his experience with public philosophy.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Philosophy has a bad reputation for being stuck in the ivory tower. But just how can you take philosophy down into the marketplace – and what will you find when you get there? On this episode, Dr Valery Vinogradovs shares his experience with public philosophy.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 09:28:20 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/699120d6/aa54b8f3.mp3" length="49025150" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2043</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Philosophy has a bad reputation for being stuck in the ivory tower. But just how can you take philosophy down into the marketplace – and what will you find when you get there? On this episode, Dr Valery Vinogradovs shares his experience with public philosophy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philosophy has a bad reputation for being stuck in the ivory tower. But just how can you take philosophy down into the marketplace – and what will you find when you get there? On this episode, Dr Valery Vinogradovs shares his experience with public philos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 3: The Ethics of Food Production</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 3: The Ethics of Food Production</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/deakinstruction-episode-3-the-ethics-of-food-production-e1d8ccdc3c307a3f5d58f6383118c2ce</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/8f4288b1</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>When we think about the ethics and politics of food we tend to think in terms of animal welfare or environmental degradation. But as Deakin’s Dr Christopher Mayes argues in his new book <a href="https://www.rowmaninternational.com/book/unsettling_food_politics/3-156-6e0251e8-0a2d-4a82-990e-f95d36e1c70e"><em>Unsettling Food Politics</em></a>, there's much more to the politics and ethics of agriculture and food production.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>When we think about the ethics and politics of food we tend to think in terms of animal welfare or environmental degradation. But as Deakin’s Dr Christopher Mayes argues in his new book <a href="https://www.rowmaninternational.com/book/unsettling_food_politics/3-156-6e0251e8-0a2d-4a82-990e-f95d36e1c70e"><em>Unsettling Food Politics</em></a>, there's much more to the politics and ethics of agriculture and food production.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:25:34 +1000</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/8f4288b1/6ef26657.mp3" length="33814728" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>1409</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When we think about the ethics and politics of food we tend to think in terms of animal welfare or environmental degradation. But as Deakin’s Dr Christopher Mayes argues in his new book Unsettling Food Politics, there's much more to the politics and ethics of agriculture and food production.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When we think about the ethics and politics of food we tend to think in terms of animal welfare or environmental degradation. But as Deakin’s Dr Christopher Mayes argues in his new book Unsettling Food Politics, there's much more to the politics and ethic</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 2: Recognition and Refusal</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 2: Recognition and Refusal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/deakinstruction-episode-2-recognition-and-refusal-b26752eb8120cbb90491015c6db5c1d7</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/80a5647b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, the issue of indigenous sovereignty has become more visible in Australian life. What role does 'recognition' play in these struggles for sovereignty? Should indigenous groups seek to be recognised by the states and societies they find themselves confronting? Or is seeking recognition itself a form of subjugation? Professor Yin Paradies spoke on this topic at a recent PHI seminar event. </p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, the issue of indigenous sovereignty has become more visible in Australian life. What role does 'recognition' play in these struggles for sovereignty? Should indigenous groups seek to be recognised by the states and societies they find themselves confronting? Or is seeking recognition itself a form of subjugation? Professor Yin Paradies spoke on this topic at a recent PHI seminar event. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:16:11 +1100</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/80a5647b/54d15a7a.mp3" length="62346052" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>2597</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the wake of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, the issue of indigenous sovereignty has become more visible in Australian life. What role does 'recognition' play in these struggles for sovereignty? Should indigenous groups seek to be recognised by the states and societies they find themselves confronting? Or is seeking recognition itself a form of subjugation? Professor Yin Paradies spoke on this topic at a recent PHI seminar event. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the wake of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, the issue of indigenous sovereignty has become more visible in Australian life. What role does 'recognition' play in these struggles for sovereignty? Should indigenous groups seek to be recognised by the </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 1: Post-Truth?</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 1: Post-Truth?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">deakinstruction.podbean.com/deakinstruction-episode-1-post-truth-0b23f14d9da9d89b5287321e8e8cb43e</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/6fb55d14</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We're told we now live in a 'post-truth' era. But are we? What does that mean? Is being 'post-truth' even possible? And if that's really where we are, how do we get out? Deakin's Dr Cathy Legg offers some pragmatist responses to the 'post-truth' era, as well as telling us what it's like working as a philosopher in the tech industry.</p>
<p><em>Read Cathy's paper "<a href="https://philarchive.org/archive/LEGTST">The Solution to Poor Opinions is More Opinions</a>"</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We're told we now live in a 'post-truth' era. But are we? What does that mean? Is being 'post-truth' even possible? And if that's really where we are, how do we get out? Deakin's Dr Cathy Legg offers some pragmatist responses to the 'post-truth' era, as well as telling us what it's like working as a philosopher in the tech industry.</p>
<p><em>Read Cathy's paper "<a href="https://philarchive.org/archive/LEGTST">The Solution to Poor Opinions is More Opinions</a>"</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:12:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <author>Deakin University</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/6fb55d14/46fd8c3a.mp3" length="40963274" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Deakin University</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/4mPkmfsNGCdgOBbcD7zQFvpjeQOodEmxe0Xm4-c2B1s/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE1OTY5NTAv/MTY5OTg0NjczNC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>1707</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We're told we now live in a 'post-truth' era. But are we? What does that mean? Is being 'post-truth' even possible? And if that's really where we are, how do we get out? Deakin's Dr Cathy Legg offers some pragmatist responses to the 'post-truth' era, as well as telling us what it's like working as a philosopher in the tech industry.
Read Cathy's paper "The Solution to Poor Opinions is More Opinions"</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We're told we now live in a 'post-truth' era. But are we? What does that mean? Is being 'post-truth' even possible? And if that's really where we are, how do we get out? Deakin's Dr Cathy Legg offers some pragmatist responses to the 'post-truth' era, as w</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
