<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheet.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://feeds.transistor.fm/apply-degger" title="MP3 Audio"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
    <title>Apply-Degger</title>
    <generator>Transistor (https://transistor.fm)</generator>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.transistor.fm/apply-degger</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <description>Not another Ted talk. Apply-Degger is a podcast series by the Onassis Foundation made for people who are curious, serious and interested, but who simply don’t have the time to sit down and read the 437 densely-written pages of Heidegger’s philosophical book. Slow down, take your time, open your ears and think deeply. Hosted by Simon Critchley. 

New episodes every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. </description>
    <copyright>© 2020 Onassis Foundation</copyright>
    <podcast:guid>56068aaa-d7ea-549f-88a2-d9be167a3168</podcast:guid>
    <podcast:locked owner="m.grammatikou@onassis.org">no</podcast:locked>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 22:08:17 +0200</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 23:25:25 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <link>https://www.onassis.org/channel/apply-degger-podcast-simon-critchley</link>
    
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
    <itunes:type>serial</itunes:type>
    <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
    <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/PfL4b7lxAFTPXghDaqleTkzY6P6wg9ro3NEPfpr-csU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzEyMDUyLzE1OTM1/MDkwNjItYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.jpg"/>
    <itunes:summary>Not another Ted talk. Apply-Degger is a podcast series by the Onassis Foundation made for people who are curious, serious and interested, but who simply don’t have the time to sit down and read the 437 densely-written pages of Heidegger’s philosophical book. Slow down, take your time, open your ears and think deeply. Hosted by Simon Critchley. 

New episodes every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. </itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Not another Ted talk.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Margarita Grammatikou</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:complete>No</itunes:complete>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 2: World</title>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 2: World</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0580ca9b-f47f-4883-b347-58dbb55fe78f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/a2b8c6ad</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is the world and how does the world show up? – Avoiding all ideas of subjectivity – Against epistemology – There is no problem of perception – We are the worldhood of the world – Our inside is outside – Praxis not theory – Why nature and science do not describe the primary phenomenon of the world – Handiness and thrusting aside our interpretative tendencies – The pragmatics of stuff – The primacy of concern and environment – When the hammer breaks – Signs and Heidegger’s funny examples – Situation and the meaningfulness of the world – Wallace Stevens on the idea of order.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is the world and how does the world show up? – Avoiding all ideas of subjectivity – Against epistemology – There is no problem of perception – We are the worldhood of the world – Our inside is outside – Praxis not theory – Why nature and science do not describe the primary phenomenon of the world – Handiness and thrusting aside our interpretative tendencies – The pragmatics of stuff – The primacy of concern and environment – When the hammer breaks – Signs and Heidegger’s funny examples – Situation and the meaningfulness of the world – Wallace Stevens on the idea of order.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:30:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/a2b8c6ad/32e9e0ab.mp3" length="141884429" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/4tEJ8J7cvuYaV61N2KACmqka9dbKj2vlnePALvWsXSY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI4Njg4OS8x/NTkzNTEzNjU5LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3546</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is the world and how does the world show up? – Avoiding all ideas of subjectivity – Against epistemology – There is no problem of perception – We are the worldhood of the world – Our inside is outside – Praxis not theory – Why nature and science do not describe the primary phenomenon of the world – Handiness and thrusting aside our interpretative tendencies – The pragmatics of stuff – The primacy of concern and environment – When the hammer breaks – Signs and Heidegger’s funny examples – Situation and the meaningfulness of the world – Wallace Stevens on the idea of order.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is the world and how does the world show up? – Avoiding all ideas of subjectivity – Against epistemology – There is no problem of perception – We are the worldhood of the world – Our inside is outside – Praxis not theory – Why nature and science do n</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>onassis foundation, simon critchley, philosophy, heidegger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 1: Heidegger's Project in Being and Time</title>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 1: Heidegger's Project in Being and Time</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">184aa280-cd51-45b0-ba80-e4ed8fa934da</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/caeb8e51</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Making sense of Heidegger - Being is time and time is finite – We are a thrown open clearing – Hamlet’s question – Reawakening the taste for perplexity - Mineness – Authenticity – Average everydayness – Phenomenology – Dasein is Being-in-the-world – Ecstasy – Categories and existentials – Not seeing the world with philosopher’s spectacles – Facticity – Leaving the cabinet of consciousness – Having a fascination with the world, and not just staring at it. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Making sense of Heidegger - Being is time and time is finite – We are a thrown open clearing – Hamlet’s question – Reawakening the taste for perplexity - Mineness – Authenticity – Average everydayness – Phenomenology – Dasein is Being-in-the-world – Ecstasy – Categories and existentials – Not seeing the world with philosopher’s spectacles – Facticity – Leaving the cabinet of consciousness – Having a fascination with the world, and not just staring at it. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:30:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/caeb8e51/d60e83a3.mp3" length="118491064" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/pwz9wrp50KyYX-CHHa14vuWIwsF-s4hCwWTjKmkI7Eo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI4Njg4OC8x/NTkzNTEzMzIyLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2961</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Making sense of Heidegger - Being is time and time is finite – We are a thrown open clearing – Hamlet’s question – Reawakening the taste for perplexity - Mineness – Authenticity – Average everydayness – Phenomenology – Dasein is Being-in-the-world – Ecstasy – Categories and existentials – Not seeing the world with philosopher’s spectacles – Facticity – Leaving the cabinet of consciousness – Having a fascination with the world, and not just staring at it. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Making sense of Heidegger - Being is time and time is finite – We are a thrown open clearing – Hamlet’s question – Reawakening the taste for perplexity - Mineness – Authenticity – Average everydayness – Phenomenology – Dasein is Being-in-the-world – Ecsta</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>onassis foundation, philosophy, simon critchley, heidegger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 3: Space</title>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 3: Space</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc51315c-618d-43f5-ace2-c668aeb7af5c</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6d8d7f6</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is wrong with Descartes’ picture of the world – Extension renders the world invisible - Phenomenology and the destruction of the modern world picture – Why is this book not called Being and Space? – Space as room and roomliness – The unavoidable character of spatial metaphors – Nearness, place and neighborhood – Art and space – The sacred, temple and templum – The near, clearing away and bringing things close – Churches, graves, radios, telephones – In Dasein, there is a collapsing of distance – Heidegger’s theory of social media – Against the metrical measurement of space – Freeing place and why architects love Heidegger – Fernando Pessoa and lessons in unlearning.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is wrong with Descartes’ picture of the world – Extension renders the world invisible - Phenomenology and the destruction of the modern world picture – Why is this book not called Being and Space? – Space as room and roomliness – The unavoidable character of spatial metaphors – Nearness, place and neighborhood – Art and space – The sacred, temple and templum – The near, clearing away and bringing things close – Churches, graves, radios, telephones – In Dasein, there is a collapsing of distance – Heidegger’s theory of social media – Against the metrical measurement of space – Freeing place and why architects love Heidegger – Fernando Pessoa and lessons in unlearning.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c6d8d7f6/033baf52.mp3" length="121746299" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/LJyikTF717tCc07pz-YA8jZogUCxn7LRwW2cn3XuxQo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI4Njg5MS8x/NTkzNTEzNzUyLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3043</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is wrong with Descartes’ picture of the world – Extension renders the world invisible - Phenomenology and the destruction of the modern world picture – Why is this book not called Being and Space? – Space as room and roomliness – The unavoidable character of spatial metaphors – Nearness, place and neighborhood – Art and space – The sacred, temple and templum – The near, clearing away and bringing things close – Churches, graves, radios, telephones – In Dasein, there is a collapsing of distance – Heidegger’s theory of social media – Against the metrical measurement of space – Freeing place and why architects love Heidegger – Fernando Pessoa and lessons in unlearning.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is wrong with Descartes’ picture of the world – Extension renders the world invisible - Phenomenology and the destruction of the modern world picture – Why is this book not called Being and Space? – Space as room and roomliness – The unavoidable char</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>onassis foundation, simon critchley, philosophy, heidegger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 4: Being with Others</title>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 4: Being with Others</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dcf8a425-f6df-4ff3-a6a4-03b88268db83</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/60532110</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We are defined by a ‘who’ not a ‘what’ – Dasein is the with – Everyone is the other and no one is himself – I am Nobody (Emily Dickinson) – Networked being – “They think me” (Rimbaud) – Displacing the Cartesian starting point for philosophy, the ‘I’ – Moments in the precipitation of the Self in “Being and Time” (Anxiety, Death, Conscience, Resoluteness, The People) – How others show up in the workshop of the world – Being alone – Caring for, leaping in and leaping ahead of the other – Considerateness and forbearance – Do we really understand others? (Levinas) – An encoded social psychology of modernity (Sloterdijk) – The dictatorship of the They – Every secret loses its force – How to become authentic.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[We are defined by a ‘who’ not a ‘what’ – Dasein is the with – Everyone is the other and no one is himself – I am Nobody (Emily Dickinson) – Networked being – “They think me” (Rimbaud) – Displacing the Cartesian starting point for philosophy, the ‘I’ – Moments in the precipitation of the Self in “Being and Time” (Anxiety, Death, Conscience, Resoluteness, The People) – How others show up in the workshop of the world – Being alone – Caring for, leaping in and leaping ahead of the other – Considerateness and forbearance – Do we really understand others? (Levinas) – An encoded social psychology of modernity (Sloterdijk) – The dictatorship of the They – Every secret loses its force – How to become authentic.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/60532110/c237d81c.mp3" length="128437913" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/Lk_eb5btf40TVRM2CYzR076rU9LkSKssKYuM0lL17Q4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI4Nzg4Ni8x/NTkzNTk2NTg3LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3210</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We are defined by a ‘who’ not a ‘what’ – Dasein is the with – Everyone is the other and no one is himself – I am Nobody (Emily Dickinson) – Networked being – “They think me” (Rimbaud) – Displacing the Cartesian starting point for philosophy, the ‘I’ – Moments in the precipitation of the Self in “Being and Time” (Anxiety, Death, Conscience, Resoluteness, The People) – How others show up in the workshop of the world – Being alone – Caring for, leaping in and leaping ahead of the other – Considerateness and forbearance – Do we really understand others? (Levinas) – An encoded social psychology of modernity (Sloterdijk) – The dictatorship of the They – Every secret loses its force – How to become authentic.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We are defined by a ‘who’ not a ‘what’ – Dasein is the with – Everyone is the other and no one is himself – I am Nobody (Emily Dickinson) – Networked being – “They think me” (Rimbaud) – Displacing the Cartesian starting point for philosophy, the ‘I’ – Mom</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>onassis foundation, philosophy, simon critchley, heidegger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 5: Thrown Projection</title>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 5: Thrown Projection</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2fa274ff-7d79-42e2-8afb-06825c458ff9</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/81423986</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The difficulty of stating the obvious – Not splitting the phenomenon – We are ourselves the clearing – The movement of disclosure and closing over as learning the rhythm of existence – The music of “Being and Time” – The four key concept clusters – State of mind, always already finding oneself there – Mood, Heidegger on the passions – Into this world we’re thrown – Dasein exists factically – Projection, Understanding, Potentiality for being, freedom – Discourse is the condition of possibility for the articulation of the clearing that is us – Logos – We are the being that talks – Falling as horizontal, not vertical, not Satanic – Falling at the world – Authenticity as a modified way in which everydayness is seized upon – Fear – Giant bears and my mother – Interpretation as the layout out of understanding – Meaning is not deep, but a question of surfaces – Being is not the rabbit in the hat – Learning to see the hat without wanting the rabbit. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The difficulty of stating the obvious – Not splitting the phenomenon – We are ourselves the clearing – The movement of disclosure and closing over as learning the rhythm of existence – The music of “Being and Time” – The four key concept clusters – State of mind, always already finding oneself there – Mood, Heidegger on the passions – Into this world we’re thrown – Dasein exists factically – Projection, Understanding, Potentiality for being, freedom – Discourse is the condition of possibility for the articulation of the clearing that is us – Logos – We are the being that talks – Falling as horizontal, not vertical, not Satanic – Falling at the world – Authenticity as a modified way in which everydayness is seized upon – Fear – Giant bears and my mother – Interpretation as the layout out of understanding – Meaning is not deep, but a question of surfaces – Being is not the rabbit in the hat – Learning to see the hat without wanting the rabbit. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 13:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/81423986/daf6b3dc.mp3" length="140820444" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/HvgY-cAoqOHj8bW8uwr9_pG_6gniCNq5Q_glW5wedf4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI4Nzg4OS8x/NTkzNTk2NzA0LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3520</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The difficulty of stating the obvious – Not splitting the phenomenon – We are ourselves the clearing – The movement of disclosure and closing over as learning the rhythm of existence – The music of “Being and Time” – The four key concept clusters – State of mind, always already finding oneself there – Mood, Heidegger on the passions – Into this world we’re thrown – Dasein exists factically – Projection, Understanding, Potentiality for being, freedom – Discourse is the condition of possibility for the articulation of the clearing that is us – Logos – We are the being that talks – Falling as horizontal, not vertical, not Satanic – Falling at the world – Authenticity as a modified way in which everydayness is seized upon – Fear – Giant bears and my mother – Interpretation as the layout out of understanding – Meaning is not deep, but a question of surfaces – Being is not the rabbit in the hat – Learning to see the hat without wanting the rabbit. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The difficulty of stating the obvious – Not splitting the phenomenon – We are ourselves the clearing – The movement of disclosure and closing over as learning the rhythm of existence – The music of “Being and Time” – The four key concept clusters – State </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>onassis foundation, simon critchley, philosophy, heidegger</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 6: Language and Interpretation</title>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 6: Language and Interpretation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed3bfcda-07e0-4531-ae9a-f625fa809036</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/258eb0fe</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Interpretation as taking something as something prior to propositions – The hermeneutic circle – Virtuous and not vicious – Judgement is not the primary locus of truth – Cribbing Aristotle – Comparison with Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus” – Important nonsense and silence – Taking things hermeneutically – The distinction between discourse and language – Communication – Language is not inside the head, it is ecstatic – Dasein has to have clean ears – The voice of the friend – Hearing, hearkening, silence and reticence – Keeping quiet – Proposal for a reticence bar called Helsinki – The human being shows itself as a being that talks – non-human language – Excursus on the octopus. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Interpretation as taking something as something prior to propositions – The hermeneutic circle – Virtuous and not vicious – Judgement is not the primary locus of truth – Cribbing Aristotle – Comparison with Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus” – Important nonsense and silence – Taking things hermeneutically – The distinction between discourse and language – Communication – Language is not inside the head, it is ecstatic – Dasein has to have clean ears – The voice of the friend – Hearing, hearkening, silence and reticence – Keeping quiet – Proposal for a reticence bar called Helsinki – The human being shows itself as a being that talks – non-human language – Excursus on the octopus. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/258eb0fe/b1a56609.mp3" length="107225400" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/eexqubZMgd2oYa8Y91IwCqt50vrnMlBJ85KxpnV_0So/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5MDA1MC8x/NTk0MDI4ODg2LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2680</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Interpretation as taking something as something prior to propositions – The hermeneutic circle – Virtuous and not vicious – Judgement is not the primary locus of truth – Cribbing Aristotle – Comparison with Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus” – Important nonsense and silence – Taking things hermeneutically – The distinction between discourse and language – Communication – Language is not inside the head, it is ecstatic – Dasein has to have clean ears – The voice of the friend – Hearing, hearkening, silence and reticence – Keeping quiet – Proposal for a reticence bar called Helsinki – The human being shows itself as a being that talks – non-human language – Excursus on the octopus. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Interpretation as taking something as something prior to propositions – The hermeneutic circle – Virtuous and not vicious – Judgement is not the primary locus of truth – Cribbing Aristotle – Comparison with Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus” – Important nonsense </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 7: Inauthentic Life</title>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 7: Inauthentic Life</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e009fcb-2f22-4fcd-a444-c18c04c4c65f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/73a979be</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Back to everyday life – This is not a philosophy of culture – Idle talking, gossiping, scribbling, updating – Curiosity, the delight in sight - Concupiscence, eye-lust -  The horror of liveliness (Hedda Gabler) -  Flirting and the phenomenology of the sexy – Ambiguity, the speed of life – Everything means something else – Being against one another – Falling is not bad – Tempting – Tranquilizing (cultural exoticism, Western Buddhism) – Alienating (self-deception) – Entangling (the triumph of the therapeutic) – Turbulence (groundless floating) – The structure of thrownness – Not a night view of Dasein, but day-time. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Back to everyday life – This is not a philosophy of culture – Idle talking, gossiping, scribbling, updating – Curiosity, the delight in sight - Concupiscence, eye-lust -  The horror of liveliness (Hedda Gabler) -  Flirting and the phenomenology of the sexy – Ambiguity, the speed of life – Everything means something else – Being against one another – Falling is not bad – Tempting – Tranquilizing (cultural exoticism, Western Buddhism) – Alienating (self-deception) – Entangling (the triumph of the therapeutic) – Turbulence (groundless floating) – The structure of thrownness – Not a night view of Dasein, but day-time. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/73a979be/a132c66f.mp3" length="82580297" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/3QWi1bNQTBgsXMmHNeEzw8Bg6IhUjkfHssgcLgthT4s/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5MDA1MS8x/NTk0MDI4OTk3LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2064</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Back to everyday life – This is not a philosophy of culture – Idle talking, gossiping, scribbling, updating – Curiosity, the delight in sight - Concupiscence, eye-lust -  The horror of liveliness (Hedda Gabler) -  Flirting and the phenomenology of the sexy – Ambiguity, the speed of life – Everything means something else – Being against one another – Falling is not bad – Tempting – Tranquilizing (cultural exoticism, Western Buddhism) – Alienating (self-deception) – Entangling (the triumph of the therapeutic) – Turbulence (groundless floating) – The structure of thrownness – Not a night view of Dasein, but day-time. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back to everyday life – This is not a philosophy of culture – Idle talking, gossiping, scribbling, updating – Curiosity, the delight in sight - Concupiscence, eye-lust -  The horror of liveliness (Hedda Gabler) -  Flirting and the phenomenology of the sex</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 8: Anxiety and Care</title>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 8: Anxiety and Care</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5eab44e6-7854-4b50-8839-b2ae2da371d5</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/791aaa8e</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bringing the whole thing together - Anxiety is way in in which the whole of Dasein is disclosed – Defining the whole as Care – The 12 steps of the Care structure -  Articulated thrown projection – We are not simple - We are a hinge – We are a unified but multi-faceted stretch (future, past and present) – Temporality as the meaning of care – A stunning personal revelation about my anxiety – Why I do philosophy – Approaching Heidegger aquatically – Opening oneself to the tender indifference of the world – Anxiety as the mood of the novel (Crusoe) – Falling out of the homely – Party being -  Time and tide – Being alone with others – Excursus on Terrence Malick – Anxiety, calm and courage – Anxiety reveals the Nothing – Darkness can help -  The Christian background to anxiety (Kierkegaard) – Saint Paul and anxious waiting – Heidegger tells us a story and gives us a happy ending – Marrying Aristotle and Christianity within atheism. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Bringing the whole thing together - Anxiety is way in in which the whole of Dasein is disclosed – Defining the whole as Care – The 12 steps of the Care structure -  Articulated thrown projection – We are not simple - We are a hinge – We are a unified but multi-faceted stretch (future, past and present) – Temporality as the meaning of care – A stunning personal revelation about my anxiety – Why I do philosophy – Approaching Heidegger aquatically – Opening oneself to the tender indifference of the world – Anxiety as the mood of the novel (Crusoe) – Falling out of the homely – Party being -  Time and tide – Being alone with others – Excursus on Terrence Malick – Anxiety, calm and courage – Anxiety reveals the Nothing – Darkness can help -  The Christian background to anxiety (Kierkegaard) – Saint Paul and anxious waiting – Heidegger tells us a story and gives us a happy ending – Marrying Aristotle and Christianity within atheism. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/791aaa8e/26159e77.mp3" length="166917783" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/NpOZefjjittXHuejD98Cc6DBTmA3Z48eVbDBoFauQPQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5MDA1My8x/NTk0MDI5MDU2LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4172</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bringing the whole thing together - Anxiety is way in in which the whole of Dasein is disclosed – Defining the whole as Care – The 12 steps of the Care structure -  Articulated thrown projection – We are not simple - We are a hinge – We are a unified but multi-faceted stretch (future, past and present) – Temporality as the meaning of care – A stunning personal revelation about my anxiety – Why I do philosophy – Approaching Heidegger aquatically – Opening oneself to the tender indifference of the world – Anxiety as the mood of the novel (Crusoe) – Falling out of the homely – Party being -  Time and tide – Being alone with others – Excursus on Terrence Malick – Anxiety, calm and courage – Anxiety reveals the Nothing – Darkness can help -  The Christian background to anxiety (Kierkegaard) – Saint Paul and anxious waiting – Heidegger tells us a story and gives us a happy ending – Marrying Aristotle and Christianity within atheism. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bringing the whole thing together - Anxiety is way in in which the whole of Dasein is disclosed – Defining the whole as Care – The 12 steps of the Care structure -  Articulated thrown projection – We are not simple - We are a hinge – We are a unified but </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 9: Reality</title>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 9: Reality</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1fe92212-86af-435a-b307-16d972e8ca69</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/c27cdcc4</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Four incorrect theses on reality - Empirical idealism (Berkeley) - Transcendental realism (from Plato to Meillassoux) - Empirical realism (Samuel Johnson kicks a stone) - Transcendental idealism (Kant) – Why the question of reality is the wrong question – Why Kant is wrong (about the subject, representation, and the priority of the present-at-hand – Heidegger’s existential deepening of Kant – The scandal of philosophy is expecting that reality requires proof – Being-in-the-world is prior to both proof and faith – Epistemology is a symptom of Dasein’s falling – Both realism and idealism are consistent with being-in-the-world and both wrong – The wrinkle in the fabric of Heidegger’s argument: the Real – The hard core to reality: physical nature, matter, the earth – A possible dualism of reality and the Real: doesn’t this split the phenomenon? ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Four incorrect theses on reality - Empirical idealism (Berkeley) - Transcendental realism (from Plato to Meillassoux) - Empirical realism (Samuel Johnson kicks a stone) - Transcendental idealism (Kant) – Why the question of reality is the wrong question – Why Kant is wrong (about the subject, representation, and the priority of the present-at-hand – Heidegger’s existential deepening of Kant – The scandal of philosophy is expecting that reality requires proof – Being-in-the-world is prior to both proof and faith – Epistemology is a symptom of Dasein’s falling – Both realism and idealism are consistent with being-in-the-world and both wrong – The wrinkle in the fabric of Heidegger’s argument: the Real – The hard core to reality: physical nature, matter, the earth – A possible dualism of reality and the Real: doesn’t this split the phenomenon? ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/c27cdcc4/8284932f.mp3" length="100387892" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/sSwwNoWYIyVDp6-jJBJ4mAvSKyVac0gCmaFwJ3O1MYU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDg3OS8x/NTk0NzE1Nzg1LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2509</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Four incorrect theses on reality - Empirical idealism (Berkeley) - Transcendental realism (from Plato to Meillassoux) - Empirical realism (Samuel Johnson kicks a stone) - Transcendental idealism (Kant) – Why the question of reality is the wrong question – Why Kant is wrong (about the subject, representation, and the priority of the present-at-hand – Heidegger’s existential deepening of Kant – The scandal of philosophy is expecting that reality requires proof – Being-in-the-world is prior to both proof and faith – Epistemology is a symptom of Dasein’s falling – Both realism and idealism are consistent with being-in-the-world and both wrong – The wrinkle in the fabric of Heidegger’s argument: the Real – The hard core to reality: physical nature, matter, the earth – A possible dualism of reality and the Real: doesn’t this split the phenomenon? </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Four incorrect theses on reality - Empirical idealism (Berkeley) - Transcendental realism (from Plato to Meillassoux) - Empirical realism (Samuel Johnson kicks a stone) - Transcendental idealism (Kant) – Why the question of reality is the wrong question –</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 10: Truth</title>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 10: Truth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf5079f8-5541-40f8-a039-32a7dd97a769</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/64e36894</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Heidegger’s reefer moment – Ek-sistence – The history of truth – Deconstructing the traditional concept of truth – Getting beneath the theory of truth as correspondence – Being-uncovering – Aletheia as unconcealment  - Heracleitus on sleeping like sheep – Preserving the force of the most elemental words – We are in the truth -  How to live in a totalitarian lie (Havel) – Dasein is in the truth and the untruth, the two paths (Parmenides) – Truth is relative to Dasein – No Dasein, no truth – Newton’s laws – There are no eternal truths – Skepticism is unintelligible because a skeptic has never existed – Heidegger’s refutation of suicide -  Finishing Division One and why we need Division Two of Being and Time.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Heidegger’s reefer moment – Ek-sistence – The history of truth – Deconstructing the traditional concept of truth – Getting beneath the theory of truth as correspondence – Being-uncovering – Aletheia as unconcealment  - Heracleitus on sleeping like sheep – Preserving the force of the most elemental words – We are in the truth -  How to live in a totalitarian lie (Havel) – Dasein is in the truth and the untruth, the two paths (Parmenides) – Truth is relative to Dasein – No Dasein, no truth – Newton’s laws – There are no eternal truths – Skepticism is unintelligible because a skeptic has never existed – Heidegger’s refutation of suicide -  Finishing Division One and why we need Division Two of Being and Time.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/64e36894/f60ad420.mp3" length="100944546" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/hQFKiHO5GIRacOxP6H5ihAFw3BWC6vQfgyQWRMfkVTE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDg4Ni8x/NTk0NzE3MjMwLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2523</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Heidegger’s reefer moment – Ek-sistence – The history of truth – Deconstructing the traditional concept of truth – Getting beneath the theory of truth as correspondence – Being-uncovering – Aletheia as unconcealment  - Heracleitus on sleeping like sheep – Preserving the force of the most elemental words – We are in the truth -  How to live in a totalitarian lie (Havel) – Dasein is in the truth and the untruth, the two paths (Parmenides) – Truth is relative to Dasein – No Dasein, no truth – Newton’s laws – There are no eternal truths – Skepticism is unintelligible because a skeptic has never existed – Heidegger’s refutation of suicide -  Finishing Division One and why we need Division Two of Being and Time.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Heidegger’s reefer moment – Ek-sistence – The history of truth – Deconstructing the traditional concept of truth – Getting beneath the theory of truth as correspondence – Being-uncovering – Aletheia as unconcealment  - Heracleitus on sleeping like sheep –</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 11: Death</title>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 11: Death</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0065d01c-a31c-4d44-ba13-5cc5f85a9131</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/0ea6379a</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Full metal Heidegger in lockdown – Why you need to become an existential phenomenologist in the pandemic – Authentic being a whole, the themes of Division Two – Unfairness to Kierkegaard -  Death as one’s ownmost, non-relational and not to be outstripped – Virility and impotence in relation to death – How others die (Tolstoy) – The certainty and indeterminacy of death – I am my not-yet – Authenticity and inauthenticity spin around in Heidegger’s analysis – The difference between expecting and anticipating death – Anticipation as the possibility of the possible – Violent language - Shattering oneself against death as a wrenching away from the They – I am possibility – Enter Nietzsche – Enter Freedom (towards death) – Having death in your mouth – Fruit – Corpse – Mourning is secondary – Dying for the other (Levinas’s discretion) – Sacrifice, holocaust – Undermining Heidegger on death – The relational character of finitude – How I see being-towards-death – The ontology of weakness. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Full metal Heidegger in lockdown – Why you need to become an existential phenomenologist in the pandemic – Authentic being a whole, the themes of Division Two – Unfairness to Kierkegaard -  Death as one’s ownmost, non-relational and not to be outstripped – Virility and impotence in relation to death – How others die (Tolstoy) – The certainty and indeterminacy of death – I am my not-yet – Authenticity and inauthenticity spin around in Heidegger’s analysis – The difference between expecting and anticipating death – Anticipation as the possibility of the possible – Violent language - Shattering oneself against death as a wrenching away from the They – I am possibility – Enter Nietzsche – Enter Freedom (towards death) – Having death in your mouth – Fruit – Corpse – Mourning is secondary – Dying for the other (Levinas’s discretion) – Sacrifice, holocaust – Undermining Heidegger on death – The relational character of finitude – How I see being-towards-death – The ontology of weakness. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 20:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/0ea6379a/a02bb692.mp3" length="191970344" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/I0_OxUnqrr4Y5_dKTqOmKFwEOjEnLsFoj2H-99iaRfM/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDg4OC8x/NTk0NzE3NDEzLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4798</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Full metal Heidegger in lockdown – Why you need to become an existential phenomenologist in the pandemic – Authentic being a whole, the themes of Division Two – Unfairness to Kierkegaard -  Death as one’s ownmost, non-relational and not to be outstripped – Virility and impotence in relation to death – How others die (Tolstoy) – The certainty and indeterminacy of death – I am my not-yet – Authenticity and inauthenticity spin around in Heidegger’s analysis – The difference between expecting and anticipating death – Anticipation as the possibility of the possible – Violent language - Shattering oneself against death as a wrenching away from the They – I am possibility – Enter Nietzsche – Enter Freedom (towards death) – Having death in your mouth – Fruit – Corpse – Mourning is secondary – Dying for the other (Levinas’s discretion) – Sacrifice, holocaust – Undermining Heidegger on death – The relational character of finitude – How I see being-towards-death – The ontology of weakness. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Full metal Heidegger in lockdown – Why you need to become an existential phenomenologist in the pandemic – Authentic being a whole, the themes of Division Two – Unfairness to Kierkegaard -  Death as one’s ownmost, non-relational and not to be outstripped </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 12: Conscience</title>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 12: Conscience</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">032a874c-b131-4b70-bdb7-969747bb0f9f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/85c51705</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Exoteric and esoteric (Leo Strauss) – The 10-minute exoteric version of conscience – The much longer esoteric version: watching the ice-floe of Being and Time break up – The null basis-being of a nullity (the shape of the argument) – The peculiar character of the call of conscience – It says nothing (Cordelia in King Lear) – It is silent – Me, myself and I - The call comes from me and yet beyond me – Stranger voice (Nietzsche) – The nothing of the world – The self divided between two nothings – The three Rs: repetition, repetition, repetition (Mark E. Smith) – Guilty! – Heidegger’s genealogy of morals – Mortgage, death-pledge, money – Dasein is a nullity that does not have power over itself – Double impotence – Lagging behind one’s possibilities – An anti-heroic Heidegger (Beckett) – Dasein is a double nullity – The experience of freedom – Guilt is the pre-moral source for any morality (Kafka) – Double zero – Quasi-transcendental philosophy (Derrida) – Weakness is the brand (Maria Bamford) – Wanting to have a conscience – Action! – Resoluteness – Stillness (Stars of the Lid) – Situation as the seizing hold of space – Resoluteness as both taking action and the passivity of resistance.     ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Exoteric and esoteric (Leo Strauss) – The 10-minute exoteric version of conscience – The much longer esoteric version: watching the ice-floe of Being and Time break up – The null basis-being of a nullity (the shape of the argument) – The peculiar character of the call of conscience – It says nothing (Cordelia in King Lear) – It is silent – Me, myself and I - The call comes from me and yet beyond me – Stranger voice (Nietzsche) – The nothing of the world – The self divided between two nothings – The three Rs: repetition, repetition, repetition (Mark E. Smith) – Guilty! – Heidegger’s genealogy of morals – Mortgage, death-pledge, money – Dasein is a nullity that does not have power over itself – Double impotence – Lagging behind one’s possibilities – An anti-heroic Heidegger (Beckett) – Dasein is a double nullity – The experience of freedom – Guilt is the pre-moral source for any morality (Kafka) – Double zero – Quasi-transcendental philosophy (Derrida) – Weakness is the brand (Maria Bamford) – Wanting to have a conscience – Action! – Resoluteness – Stillness (Stars of the Lid) – Situation as the seizing hold of space – Resoluteness as both taking action and the passivity of resistance.     ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/85c51705/56cff519.mp3" length="210591907" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/NndWj6GFtjHMhT3gcKEdGu1FHro5FV_1PyAtWQxudD8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDg4OS8x/NTk0NzE3NzIyLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>5264</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Exoteric and esoteric (Leo Strauss) – The 10-minute exoteric version of conscience – The much longer esoteric version: watching the ice-floe of Being and Time break up – The null basis-being of a nullity (the shape of the argument) – The peculiar character of the call of conscience – It says nothing (Cordelia in King Lear) – It is silent – Me, myself and I - The call comes from me and yet beyond me – Stranger voice (Nietzsche) – The nothing of the world – The self divided between two nothings – The three Rs: repetition, repetition, repetition (Mark E. Smith) – Guilty! – Heidegger’s genealogy of morals – Mortgage, death-pledge, money – Dasein is a nullity that does not have power over itself – Double impotence – Lagging behind one’s possibilities – An anti-heroic Heidegger (Beckett) – Dasein is a double nullity – The experience of freedom – Guilt is the pre-moral source for any morality (Kafka) – Double zero – Quasi-transcendental philosophy (Derrida) – Weakness is the brand (Maria Bamford) – Wanting to have a conscience – Action! – Resoluteness – Stillness (Stars of the Lid) – Situation as the seizing hold of space – Resoluteness as both taking action and the passivity of resistance.     </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Exoteric and esoteric (Leo Strauss) – The 10-minute exoteric version of conscience – The much longer esoteric version: watching the ice-floe of Being and Time break up – The null basis-being of a nullity (the shape of the argument) – The peculiar characte</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 13: Anticipatory Resoluteness</title>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 13: Anticipatory Resoluteness</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">453b468b-64b6-4675-ab90-a9ec3812f0bd</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ca1cc12b</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What do death and the concrete situation of action have in common? – A puzzling footnote on sin – Holding-for-true as the certainty of conscience – Resoluteness is repetition – How death has power over Dasein’s illusions – Sober anxiety – The presence of Freud(e) in Being and Time – Joy - Discourse on the method – How we must do violence to ourselves in order to become authentic – Virtuous circularity – How do we conceive the unity of the self? – Heidegger’s relation to Kant’s ‘I think’ – How Kant is both right and wrong – Kant’s response to Hume on the self – Cogito without an ergo sum – Self as activity (Fichte) – Heidegger on the constancy of the self – Dasein is itself in the silent resoluteness of action in a situation – The constancy of the self consists in repetition – performance – Descartes’ dilemma with the cogito and Heidegger’s attempt to think self without ground – We are our acts, nothing more.  ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What do death and the concrete situation of action have in common? – A puzzling footnote on sin – Holding-for-true as the certainty of conscience – Resoluteness is repetition – How death has power over Dasein’s illusions – Sober anxiety – The presence of Freud(e) in Being and Time – Joy - Discourse on the method – How we must do violence to ourselves in order to become authentic – Virtuous circularity – How do we conceive the unity of the self? – Heidegger’s relation to Kant’s ‘I think’ – How Kant is both right and wrong – Kant’s response to Hume on the self – Cogito without an ergo sum – Self as activity (Fichte) – Heidegger on the constancy of the self – Dasein is itself in the silent resoluteness of action in a situation – The constancy of the self consists in repetition – performance – Descartes’ dilemma with the cogito and Heidegger’s attempt to think self without ground – We are our acts, nothing more.  ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ca1cc12b/b194302b.mp3" length="146123255" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/xe312QVIvV7WLEEtHV8S4dK6oO837Z8s9hpSUGoxGIE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDg5MS8x/NTk0NzE3OTMwLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>3652</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What do death and the concrete situation of action have in common? – A puzzling footnote on sin – Holding-for-true as the certainty of conscience – Resoluteness is repetition – How death has power over Dasein’s illusions – Sober anxiety – The presence of Freud(e) in Being and Time – Joy - Discourse on the method – How we must do violence to ourselves in order to become authentic – Virtuous circularity – How do we conceive the unity of the self? – Heidegger’s relation to Kant’s ‘I think’ – How Kant is both right and wrong – Kant’s response to Hume on the self – Cogito without an ergo sum – Self as activity (Fichte) – Heidegger on the constancy of the self – Dasein is itself in the silent resoluteness of action in a situation – The constancy of the self consists in repetition – performance – Descartes’ dilemma with the cogito and Heidegger’s attempt to think self without ground – We are our acts, nothing more.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What do death and the concrete situation of action have in common? – A puzzling footnote on sin – Holding-for-true as the certainty of conscience – Resoluteness is repetition – How death has power over Dasein’s illusions – Sober anxiety – The presence of </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 14: Ecstatic Temporality</title>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 14: Ecstatic Temporality</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc031b5f-f04c-430e-921b-b98d706f43db</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/af5bb361</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Unwavering discipline – Authentic Dasein is the unity of the three ecstases of time – The three-step rhythm of temporality – The future as coming towards itself – What comes out of the future is my having-been, the past –The past is null, but not annulled – The curtains lift on action – The future opens up the past and releases itself into the present – The moment of vision, the glance of the eye – Kairos as the fulfilment of time (without Christ) – How can time be said without metaphysics? – Verbalizing nouns, speaking in tautology - Temporality temporalizes itself – Dasein is the ecstatic one (Taminiaux’s story) – The meaning of finitude – End-ly time –Towards oneself! Existing as the nullity that I am - Sketch of a critique of Heidegger on time: the primacy of the past over the future.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Unwavering discipline – Authentic Dasein is the unity of the three ecstases of time – The three-step rhythm of temporality – The future as coming towards itself – What comes out of the future is my having-been, the past –The past is null, but not annulled – The curtains lift on action – The future opens up the past and releases itself into the present – The moment of vision, the glance of the eye – Kairos as the fulfilment of time (without Christ) – How can time be said without metaphysics? – Verbalizing nouns, speaking in tautology - Temporality temporalizes itself – Dasein is the ecstatic one (Taminiaux’s story) – The meaning of finitude – End-ly time –Towards oneself! Existing as the nullity that I am - Sketch of a critique of Heidegger on time: the primacy of the past over the future.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/af5bb361/9dd5a19f.mp3" length="100669936" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/ZzzM5QmpTfZA26qmq7MpYVcO4_GIL-iHrwqLta4GCZk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDg5Mi8x/NTk0NzE4MTE1LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2516</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Unwavering discipline – Authentic Dasein is the unity of the three ecstases of time – The three-step rhythm of temporality – The future as coming towards itself – What comes out of the future is my having-been, the past –The past is null, but not annulled – The curtains lift on action – The future opens up the past and releases itself into the present – The moment of vision, the glance of the eye – Kairos as the fulfilment of time (without Christ) – How can time be said without metaphysics? – Verbalizing nouns, speaking in tautology - Temporality temporalizes itself – Dasein is the ecstatic one (Taminiaux’s story) – The meaning of finitude – End-ly time –Towards oneself! Existing as the nullity that I am - Sketch of a critique of Heidegger on time: the primacy of the past over the future.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Unwavering discipline – Authentic Dasein is the unity of the three ecstases of time – The three-step rhythm of temporality – The future as coming towards itself – What comes out of the future is my having-been, the past –The past is null, but not annulled</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 15: The Time of the Everyday World</title>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 15: The Time of the Everyday World</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9cab630f-5e5d-46cf-af4c-fc23d771fcfe</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/01deca34</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The repetition of average everydayness from the standpoint of authentic temporality – Awaiting – Rapture – More unfairness to Kierkegaard – Making present – Forgetting – Repetition and memory – Bewildered fear, a burning house – Beckett – Resolute Dasein has no fear – Anxiety in the face of the nothing of the world – A taxonymy of moods – Hope comes in to tickle your feet – Equanimity – Being dragged along in thrownness – The authentic and inauthentic ecstases do not come in succession – The future is not later than the past – The genesis of the theoretical view of the world – An existential conception of science -  Life-world practices and science – Phenomenology as pre-science – Deliberation is not absent from Heidegger (Tugendhat) – Different ways of philosophizing with a hammer – The importance of place – How nature is seen by modern science – Mathematical projection, data, modelling – Dasein is its world existingly – How the transcendence of being-in-the-world gets covered over in subject/object dualism – Horizonal schemas defined (with Kant) – The time of spatiality – Taking space in, literally – Leeway, play-space -  Back to the everyday – The relation between authenticity and the everyday – There is no breakout from the cave – The enigma of everydayness – Philosophy and the enigmatic apriori. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The repetition of average everydayness from the standpoint of authentic temporality – Awaiting – Rapture – More unfairness to Kierkegaard – Making present – Forgetting – Repetition and memory – Bewildered fear, a burning house – Beckett – Resolute Dasein has no fear – Anxiety in the face of the nothing of the world – A taxonymy of moods – Hope comes in to tickle your feet – Equanimity – Being dragged along in thrownness – The authentic and inauthentic ecstases do not come in succession – The future is not later than the past – The genesis of the theoretical view of the world – An existential conception of science -  Life-world practices and science – Phenomenology as pre-science – Deliberation is not absent from Heidegger (Tugendhat) – Different ways of philosophizing with a hammer – The importance of place – How nature is seen by modern science – Mathematical projection, data, modelling – Dasein is its world existingly – How the transcendence of being-in-the-world gets covered over in subject/object dualism – Horizonal schemas defined (with Kant) – The time of spatiality – Taking space in, literally – Leeway, play-space -  Back to the everyday – The relation between authenticity and the everyday – There is no breakout from the cave – The enigma of everydayness – Philosophy and the enigmatic apriori. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/01deca34/8548e49c.mp3" length="238047915" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/DuNU7AyyOrW1u4JQRZGA62y3hwGis_SrZm03JqPdcRI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDkwMy8x/NTk0NzIxOTY2LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>5950</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The repetition of average everydayness from the standpoint of authentic temporality – Awaiting – Rapture – More unfairness to Kierkegaard – Making present – Forgetting – Repetition and memory – Bewildered fear, a burning house – Beckett – Resolute Dasein has no fear – Anxiety in the face of the nothing of the world – A taxonymy of moods – Hope comes in to tickle your feet – Equanimity – Being dragged along in thrownness – The authentic and inauthentic ecstases do not come in succession – The future is not later than the past – The genesis of the theoretical view of the world – An existential conception of science -  Life-world practices and science – Phenomenology as pre-science – Deliberation is not absent from Heidegger (Tugendhat) – Different ways of philosophizing with a hammer – The importance of place – How nature is seen by modern science – Mathematical projection, data, modelling – Dasein is its world existingly – How the transcendence of being-in-the-world gets covered over in subject/object dualism – Horizonal schemas defined (with Kant) – The time of spatiality – Taking space in, literally – Leeway, play-space -  Back to the everyday – The relation between authenticity and the everyday – There is no breakout from the cave – The enigma of everydayness – Philosophy and the enigmatic apriori. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The repetition of average everydayness from the standpoint of authentic temporality – Awaiting – Rapture – More unfairness to Kierkegaard – Making present – Forgetting – Repetition and memory – Bewildered fear, a burning house – Beckett – Resolute Dasein </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 16: Historicity and Politics</title>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 16: Historicity and Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">96a2b141-0002-4fd8-9182-5825b48c3b3d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/ae54a4b7</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Death-obsessed male philosophers and the question of birth (Arendt) – The power of beginning – Stretchedness, persistence, movedness – Historizing as happening – History is rare – World history (a Greek temple) – The past lies ahead of us – Natural history – The ring – The loyalty of existence – Inauthentic history and the craving for the new – Recurrence and the love of fate – How to approach the science of history on the basis of existence – Monumental, antiquarian and critical (Nietzsche on history) – Heidegger’s debt to Dilthey – Philosophy as a manifestation of life – Fatigue – Why paragraph 74 of Being and Time is so important – Heidegger’s reply to Löwith – ‘See you later, alligator’, excursus on Lacoue-Labarthe – Heidegger’s revolutionary conception of history – Fate as individual, Destiny as collective – My struggle - The People (Volk) – The inner truth and greatness of National Socialism – Young Habermas – Who are the Germans? – Heidegger’s thinking of the One (henology) – Against authenticity - Defusing the link between philosophy and politics – Radicalizing facticity – Tragic and comic Heidegger – powerlessness – Heritage as the counter-concept to tradition – History as repetition – A weird thought: we repeat from out of the future – History is not the past – History comes to be from out of the future (Sandinista).]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Death-obsessed male philosophers and the question of birth (Arendt) – The power of beginning – Stretchedness, persistence, movedness – Historizing as happening – History is rare – World history (a Greek temple) – The past lies ahead of us – Natural history – The ring – The loyalty of existence – Inauthentic history and the craving for the new – Recurrence and the love of fate – How to approach the science of history on the basis of existence – Monumental, antiquarian and critical (Nietzsche on history) – Heidegger’s debt to Dilthey – Philosophy as a manifestation of life – Fatigue – Why paragraph 74 of Being and Time is so important – Heidegger’s reply to Löwith – ‘See you later, alligator’, excursus on Lacoue-Labarthe – Heidegger’s revolutionary conception of history – Fate as individual, Destiny as collective – My struggle - The People (Volk) – The inner truth and greatness of National Socialism – Young Habermas – Who are the Germans? – Heidegger’s thinking of the One (henology) – Against authenticity - Defusing the link between philosophy and politics – Radicalizing facticity – Tragic and comic Heidegger – powerlessness – Heritage as the counter-concept to tradition – History as repetition – A weird thought: we repeat from out of the future – History is not the past – History comes to be from out of the future (Sandinista).]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/ae54a4b7/e436efa3.mp3" length="240732298" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/kpMlLJFJZlEvAFhy29AA2Ywa-bFjb3PhroUhN31VbNw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDkwNS8x/NTk0NzIyMTgyLWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>6017</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Death-obsessed male philosophers and the question of birth (Arendt) – The power of beginning – Stretchedness, persistence, movedness – Historizing as happening – History is rare – World history (a Greek temple) – The past lies ahead of us – Natural history – The ring – The loyalty of existence – Inauthentic history and the craving for the new – Recurrence and the love of fate – How to approach the science of history on the basis of existence – Monumental, antiquarian and critical (Nietzsche on history) – Heidegger’s debt to Dilthey – Philosophy as a manifestation of life – Fatigue – Why paragraph 74 of Being and Time is so important – Heidegger’s reply to Löwith – ‘See you later, alligator’, excursus on Lacoue-Labarthe – Heidegger’s revolutionary conception of history – Fate as individual, Destiny as collective – My struggle - The People (Volk) – The inner truth and greatness of National Socialism – Young Habermas – Who are the Germans? – Heidegger’s thinking of the One (henology) – Against authenticity - Defusing the link between philosophy and politics – Radicalizing facticity – Tragic and comic Heidegger – powerlessness – Heritage as the counter-concept to tradition – History as repetition – A weird thought: we repeat from out of the future – History is not the past – History comes to be from out of the future (Sandinista).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Death-obsessed male philosophers and the question of birth (Arendt) – The power of beginning – Stretchedness, persistence, movedness – Historizing as happening – History is rare – World history (a Greek temple) – The past lies ahead of us – Natural histor</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 17: Existential Time and Vulgar Time</title>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 17: Existential Time and Vulgar Time</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a9cf4a2-80f5-4e18-9127-b75f54f98d2f</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/b3a803bc</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Three conceptions of time: primordial time, world time and vulgar time – The genesis of the tyranny of the present – Time-reckoning – Datability – Duration or the span of world time – Inauthentic Dasein has no time – Authentic Dasein is its time and always has time – Take your time – Time first shows itself in the sky – Brightness, night – Tide – Heidegger is not a thinker of the sea – ‘Primitive’ Dasein, the peasant’s clock, shadow and the sundial - ‘Advanced’ Dasein and electricity – Footnote on the theory of relativity – Time and physis – The genesis of linear Now-time – Time in Aristotle’s Physics – Counted nows, the flow, the stream of time – What is wrong with eternity – Primordial time is finite, reversible, ecstatic and episodic – How time becomes leveled off – Time and the soul – Spirit falling into time (Hegel) – Why Hegel is wrong – The long, final footnote to Being and Time (Derrida) – The endurance of Aristotle’s conception of time in Bergson – Time-consciousness in Husserl.]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Three conceptions of time: primordial time, world time and vulgar time – The genesis of the tyranny of the present – Time-reckoning – Datability – Duration or the span of world time – Inauthentic Dasein has no time – Authentic Dasein is its time and always has time – Take your time – Time first shows itself in the sky – Brightness, night – Tide – Heidegger is not a thinker of the sea – ‘Primitive’ Dasein, the peasant’s clock, shadow and the sundial - ‘Advanced’ Dasein and electricity – Footnote on the theory of relativity – Time and physis – The genesis of linear Now-time – Time in Aristotle’s Physics – Counted nows, the flow, the stream of time – What is wrong with eternity – Primordial time is finite, reversible, ecstatic and episodic – How time becomes leveled off – Time and the soul – Spirit falling into time (Hegel) – Why Hegel is wrong – The long, final footnote to Being and Time (Derrida) – The endurance of Aristotle’s conception of time in Bergson – Time-consciousness in Husserl.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/b3a803bc/f9651369.mp3" length="173263606" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/Oi9gblfLoNbEy4OL5pCgYSr5uqMDmznD273PMIIG-pI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDkwNi8x/NTk0NzIyMzQ2LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>4331</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Three conceptions of time: primordial time, world time and vulgar time – The genesis of the tyranny of the present – Time-reckoning – Datability – Duration or the span of world time – Inauthentic Dasein has no time – Authentic Dasein is its time and always has time – Take your time – Time first shows itself in the sky – Brightness, night – Tide – Heidegger is not a thinker of the sea – ‘Primitive’ Dasein, the peasant’s clock, shadow and the sundial - ‘Advanced’ Dasein and electricity – Footnote on the theory of relativity – Time and physis – The genesis of linear Now-time – Time in Aristotle’s Physics – Counted nows, the flow, the stream of time – What is wrong with eternity – Primordial time is finite, reversible, ecstatic and episodic – How time becomes leveled off – Time and the soul – Spirit falling into time (Hegel) – Why Hegel is wrong – The long, final footnote to Being and Time (Derrida) – The endurance of Aristotle’s conception of time in Bergson – Time-consciousness in Husserl.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Three conceptions of time: primordial time, world time and vulgar time – The genesis of the tyranny of the present – Time-reckoning – Datability – Duration or the span of world time – Inauthentic Dasein has no time – Authentic Dasein is its time and alway</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 18: Coda: Opening and Presence</title>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Episode 18: Coda: Opening and Presence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d0cf9e4c-d224-4a23-87aa-cbf1c3e3b384</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/4651af08</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The relation between the construction and destruction in Being and Time – How the incompletion of Heidegger’s project has been exaggerated – The fetishization of failure and the provisional  Heidegger’s marginalia on his own book – What happens when we destroy the tradition - Presencing out of the source – The end of philosophy and the task for thinking – Being as opening, time as presence – The last words of Being and Time; or WTF Martin? - The risk of self-paralysis in false philosophical modesty – Against Towardism – Having the courage of your convictions – The massive amount that we have learned from Being and Time – Polemic: why this is the right path to be taken in philosophy – Finitude restated – Naming the experience of the appropriative event – There is no turning in Heidegger’s work, just a deepening – The importance of building castles in the air – All that there is, is air – How Being and Time changes one’s life and approach to philosophy – Leaving the climate of Heidegger’s thinking (Levinas).]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The relation between the construction and destruction in Being and Time – How the incompletion of Heidegger’s project has been exaggerated – The fetishization of failure and the provisional  Heidegger’s marginalia on his own book – What happens when we destroy the tradition - Presencing out of the source – The end of philosophy and the task for thinking – Being as opening, time as presence – The last words of Being and Time; or WTF Martin? - The risk of self-paralysis in false philosophical modesty – Against Towardism – Having the courage of your convictions – The massive amount that we have learned from Being and Time – Polemic: why this is the right path to be taken in philosophy – Finitude restated – Naming the experience of the appropriative event – There is no turning in Heidegger’s work, just a deepening – The importance of building castles in the air – All that there is, is air – How Being and Time changes one’s life and approach to philosophy – Leaving the climate of Heidegger’s thinking (Levinas).]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/4651af08/a511accd.mp3" length="107394311" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Onassis Foundation, Simon Critchley</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/rzjhcnyeFxcylhzvhYBGxyAqCAA962l9hFIxpdiH1_k/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzI5NDkxMC8x/NTk0NzIyOTE4LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>2684</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The relation between the construction and destruction in Being and Time – How the incompletion of Heidegger’s project has been exaggerated – The fetishization of failure and the provisional  Heidegger’s marginalia on his own book – What happens when we destroy the tradition - Presencing out of the source – The end of philosophy and the task for thinking – Being as opening, time as presence – The last words of Being and Time; or WTF Martin? - The risk of self-paralysis in false philosophical modesty – Against Towardism – Having the courage of your convictions – The massive amount that we have learned from Being and Time – Polemic: why this is the right path to be taken in philosophy – Finitude restated – Naming the experience of the appropriative event – There is no turning in Heidegger’s work, just a deepening – The importance of building castles in the air – All that there is, is air – How Being and Time changes one’s life and approach to philosophy – Leaving the climate of Heidegger’s thinking (Levinas).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The relation between the construction and destruction in Being and Time – How the incompletion of Heidegger’s project has been exaggerated – The fetishization of failure and the provisional  Heidegger’s marginalia on his own book – What happens when we de</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extra: Eat Your Funky Dasein</title>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:title>Extra: Eat Your Funky Dasein</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b3317c1-a5a9-477d-b0e2-eb71dd66fb8d</guid>
      <link>https://share.transistor.fm/s/13897deb</link>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Slow down, take your time, open your ears and enjoy the music. With Apply-Degger podcast series coming to an end, Simon Critchley teams up with musician, composer and sound designer, John Simmons to present a bonus track supported by the Onassis Foundation. In other words, this is the perfect season finale. ]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Slow down, take your time, open your ears and enjoy the music. With Apply-Degger podcast series coming to an end, Simon Critchley teams up with musician, composer and sound designer, John Simmons to present a bonus track supported by the Onassis Foundation. In other words, this is the perfect season finale. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <author>Simon Critchley &amp; John Simmons</author>
      <enclosure url="https://media.transistor.fm/13897deb/96f48a51.mp3" length="4192902" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:author>Simon Critchley &amp; John Simmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://img.transistor.fm/2ZpJOEnwD7DRRalOco9uSAtfOu62hufoaODeIJt6rAg/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzMwNzU5NS8x/NTk2MTAyNDk1LWFy/dHdvcmsuanBn.jpg"/>
      <itunes:duration>260</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Slow down, take your time, open your ears and enjoy the music. With Apply-Degger podcast series coming to an end, Simon Critchley teams up with musician, composer and sound designer, John Simmons to present a bonus track supported by the Onassis Foundation. In other words, this is the perfect season finale. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Slow down, take your time, open your ears and enjoy the music. With Apply-Degger podcast series coming to an end, Simon Critchley teams up with musician, composer and sound designer, John Simmons to present a bonus track supported by the Onassis Foundatio</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>philosophy, heidegger, simon critchley, onassis foundation</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
